Friend or foe?

Tom Dunne

So ladies, if the man in your life wanted you to bring a friend to join you for a threesome, would it have to be somebody you know incredibly well, or would it have to be somebody you know nothing about?

And why?

Jules

Someone i know nothing about but i would have to vet them before allowing it. There would be many many rules....


Can't have a woman as good looking as me there, plus i would have to find her attractive too.

smashey

Why don't you just ask Lucy?

Tom Dunne

Jules wrote: »

Can't have a woman as good looking as me there, plus i would have to find her attractive too.

All women find all women attractive.

At least they do in my head.

smashey wrote: »

Why don't you just ask Lucy?

Her friends are a little weird. I would prefer some "hired help".

pow wow

Someone I knew zero about and was guaranteed never to see again (I'd also need a guarantee himself wouldn't see her again too....with or without me :cool:)

Don't really mind if she's better looking than me tbh.

LadyJ

Someone I knew nothing about definitely!

I'd just get jealous if it was one of my friends. I'd always be wondering afterwards whether my boyfriend was checking her out on the sly or something like that. At least with a stranger you can just cut them out immediately after the whole thing.

smashey

Tom Dunne wrote: »

Her friends are a little weird. I would prefer some "hired help".

That's where Tanya went to.

Lucy Lu

Tom Dunne wrote: »

Her friends are a little weird. I would prefer some "hired help".

What about a certain blonde you regard as "perky"

LadyJ

Tom, didn't you start that other thread about threesomes in AH a while back?
Are you and Lucy looking for someone to join in with your sexy adventures?

Tom Dunne

Lucy Lu wrote: »

What about a certain blonde you regard as "perky"

I asked her that time you were in France and she was keen. Then she went into rehab and I've heard nothing since.

Lucy Lu

LadyJ wrote: »

Tom, didn't you start that other thread about threesomes in AH a while back?
Are you and Lucy looking for someone to join in with your sexy adventures?

NO! I think Tom is going mad, I am even starting to get worried now :eek:

ztoical

Tom Dunne wrote: »

So ladies, if the man in your life wanted you to bring a friend to join you for a threesome, would it have to be somebody you know incredibly well, or would it have to be somebody you know nothing about?

And why?

I would prefer a guy I don't know as friend but I do know is clean [actually test results would need to be shown no "trust me I'm clean" rubbish] My really close male friends are like brothers to me so it would be weird if it was one of them.

Tom Dunne

LadyJ wrote: »

Tom, didn't you start that other thread about threesomes in AH a while back?
Are you and Lucy looking for someone to join in with your sexy adventures?

Damn. You are on to me.

The bar in BGRH is actually a front for a swingers community.

smashey

Tom Dunne wrote: »

The bar in BGRH is actually a front for a swingers community.

Shhhhhh.

LadyJ

Tom Dunne wrote: »

Damn. You are on to me.

The bar in BGRH is actually a front for a swingers community.

Sh*t! Now I'm sad, no one's ever propositioned me!
I'm sure the boyf would be delighted to swap me for a night!
I'll have to bring him to the bar sometime!

Jules

What about the men, how would they feel if the wimmens ask for another man to join in?

Tom Dunne

Jules wrote: »

What about the men, how would they feel if the wimmens ask for another man to join in?

Not a friggin' hope in hell. No way, Jose. Negative. Non. Nyet. Nooooooo. Nein.

That would be just weird.

Jules

Why is it ok for two women and a man but not visa versa!

Zaph

Tom Dunne wrote: »

Not a friggin' hope in hell. No way, Jose. Negative. Non. Nyet. Nooooooo. Nein.

That would be just weird.

You forgot sick and perverted, Brother Tom

ztoical

Tom Dunne wrote: »

That would be just weird.

but it wouldn't be weird to bring another woman? feck off, bloody double standards - hubby wants threesome hubby had better be offering me something I want [like naked christopher maloni]

ztoical

honestly don't get guys obession with threesomes - you can't find the g-spot on one girl but if theres two those are better odds?

Tom Dunne

Jules wrote: »

Why is it ok for two women and a man but not visa versa!

We all know that women actually would enjoy the attention of another woman, but men would certainly not enjoy the attention of another man.

Zaph wrote: »

You forgot sick and perverted, Brother Tom

I was restraining myself, Brother Zaph. I have manners when I am in the Ladies Lounge.

ztoical wrote: »

but it wouldn't be weird to bring another woman? feck off, bloody double standards - hubby wants threesome hubby had better be offering me something I want [like naked christopher maloni]

No, no, no, it's not double standards. It's natural law.

Anti

Tom Dunne wrote: »

Not a friggin' hope in hell. No way, Jose. Negative. Non. Nyet. Nooooooo. Nein.

That would be just weird.

Amen brother ! Wouldnt want to cross swords !

ztoical

Tom Dunne wrote: »

No, no, no, it's not double standards. It's natural law.

O grow up

Might get myself banned for saying this but for fecks sake could a mod please lock this - isn't this what the after hours forum is for? Whats the point of having a "the ladies lounge" if its going to a bunch of posts from blokes trying to prove the stupid notion that all women will sleep with other women and men. There's no such things as lesbians only a women who havn't been ****ed properly mentality. Honestly its so backwards and childish.

Anti

ztoical wrote: »

O grow up

Might get myself banned for saying this but for fecks sake could a mod please lock this - isn't this what the after hours forum is for? Whats the point of having a "the ladies lounge" if its going to a bunch of posts from blokes trying to prove the stupid notion that all women will sleep with other women and men. There's no such things as lesbians only a women who havn't been ****ed properly mentality. Honestly its so backwards and childish.

But its ammusingly hilarious to read.

Jules

But maybe we can help to educate them.

You should not rise tot hem so easily that is what they want, give your point and be done with it.

And personally i do find it fuuny to read, and also would like to get some other ladies views on the subject.

Tom Dunne

ztoical wrote: »

Might get myself banned for saying this but for fecks sake could a mod please lock this - isn't this what the after hours forum is for?

This is a legitimate debate. Yes, there is the odd opinion that might be better suited to the Sunday World problem page, but in general I feel it is a matter that is suited to this forum, especially the large percentage of ladies that frequent here.

ztoical wrote: »

There's no such things as lesbians

Now you are talking silly. Of course there are such things as lesbians. All women have an inner lesbian. A curious inner lesbian that is willing to experiment.

Jules

Tom Dunne wrote: »

Now you are talking silly. Of course there are such things as lesbians. All women have an inner lesbian. A curious inner lesbian that is willing to experiment.

So is it the same for men, do you all have a little gay inside of you... pardon the pun, willing to experiment?

ztoical

Tom Dunne wrote: »

Now you are talking silly. Of course there are such things as lesbians. All women have an inner lesbian. A curious inner lesbian that is willing to experiment.

And while others might think that is amusing, I find it yawn and shall wander back to the comics forum, have a good evening honey.

Jules

Wow comics forum that must be so exciting...

Tom Dunne

Jules wrote: »

So is it the same for men, do you all have a little gay inside of you... pardon the pun, willing to experiment?

I am always willing to experiment.

However, biologically, it is not the same for men. The number one goal for men is to sow their wild oats far and wide. That is why men can continue fathering children well into their latter years (assuming they can get it up). The primary goal is to set the little soldiers free to work their magic, with no emotion, no strings attached.

Women, however, seek the emotional attachment. A caring, loving relationship and an emotional attachment that perhaps, another woman can provide. Hence there hidden predisposition to seek intimacy with other women.

Hence why women are more likely to part-take in a threesome than men. And enjoy it.

Jules

Tom Dunne wrote: »

Women, however, seek the emotional attachment. A caring, loving relationship and an emotional attachment that perhaps, another woman can provide. Hence there hidden predisposition to seek intimacy with other women.

Hence why women are more likely to part-take in a threesome than men. And enjoy it.

DOUBLE STANDARD... why can't women have unemotional unloving uncaring relationships?

Tom Dunne

Jules wrote: »

DOUBLE STANDARD... why can't women have unemotional unloving uncaring relationships?

That's not double standard, that's nature. Women want an emotional, secure, caring relationship, it's in their biology. It's hard-wired into their brain.

Yes, there are occasions where they may want a fling, but deep down, they want something more.

Don't fight it, Jules, you know you want to.

Jules

At this time in my life yes that is what i want, but its not natural for a woman to just want what you stated.......

SO THERE!

Tom Dunne

Jules wrote: »

but its not natural for a woman to just want what you stated.......

The biological evidence states otherwise.

SO NA!

Jules

Tom Dunne wrote: »

The biological evidence states otherwise.

SO NA!

What evidence... ya big ninny!

jellie

whatever about "willingness to experiment" i could just never watch another girl near my bf.

Tom Dunne

Jules wrote: »

What evidence... ya big ninny!

The evidence I have already presented, your honour.

Tom Dunne wrote: »

Women, however, seek the emotional attachment. A caring, loving relationship and an emotional attachment that perhaps, another woman can provide. Hence there hidden predisposition to seek intimacy with other women.

Hence why women are more likely to part-take in a threesome than men. And enjoy it.

DJ_Spider

I know a lot of men fantasise about this, but realistically think about it. If another girl joins you and your BF, who is she going to be more interested in? OK if she plays for both sides then both of you, but if she is 'lesbian; she will only be interested in your GF. So you might as well just watch HBO!

I had a ex GF who wanted a 3some, never did it though cos I didn't want to have someone with a bigger piece than me! (Even though they wouldn't.....yeah right!)

Just my 2c!

WindSock

Here come the worms ....this thread has the potential for gurlz r hot lezbos n shud perform for me type replies, so lets not go there please? Keep the replies civil, witty if you may. Or get thee to AH. Ta

Jesus Wept

WindSock wrote:

gurlz r hot lezbos n shud perform for me

AND ME, OMG QFT+ELVENTY BILLIONZ :eek::D

Rattlehead_ie

There you go another one to add to the double standards thread.

So I just added it to my post why is it that guys get freaked out at thought of MMF threesomes while FFM is fine.

Tom Dunne

It's not double standards, it's nature.

Maple

nope, couldn't watch another girl with a guy i was in love with.

maybe i could do it if it was for experimentation and i was feeling a bit wild but not with someone i'm emotionally involved with.

Carlito78

I agree with ya Maple but you should try MMF... its pretty cool. Had a recent experience- the attention is great. Not many guys will agree to it tho!:mad:

Kazobel

I was the extra participent in a few of them in my younger, wilder days and it was pretty fun at the time. They were with friends and it never really had any bad effect on our friendships or their relationships. I wouldn't have been what any of them would have wanted as a full time partner so jealousy or paranoia of wether one or the other were checking me out afterwards was really never an issue. As for now if I was asked I honestly don't know if I'd do it again but if I was in a relationship I don't think I could bring someone else into it, in the end I know it would eat away at me on some level wether I knew them or not.

Slow Motion

I have to say, my other half is more than enough woman for me! I wouldn't have the energy for her + 1. 1 good woman is enough for anyone;)

Will

mff - no bother
fmm - i dont know, itd have to be a guy i know quite well and no shenanigans between us.
i think the main reason guys dont wanna do threesomes with other guys is because theyre afraid the other guy coming in will have a bigger tool.
threesomes are over-rated, someone always gets left out *sobs*

Rattlehead_ie

I dont know about most women but the women I have talked to about this before all are of the opinion that they would like to try MMF, but where the 2 guys are not with each other, more that the 2 guys JUST pay attention to the girl. So its not like the girls expect you too well......whatever you do in a threesome. Although Im sure there is exception.

Susannahmia

Tom Dunne wrote: »

We all know that women actually would enjoy the attention of another woman, but men would certainly not enjoy the attention of another man

That's not true the thought of being with another woman turns my stomach! Just because you want it to be true doesn't mean it is. Men:rolleyes:. Imo this thread has no place in the ladies lounge and is explicitly sexist.

Slow Motion

Susannahmia wrote: »

That's not true the thought of being with another woman turns my stomach! Just because you want it to be true doesn't mean it is. Men:rolleyes:.

It's in Toms head, and nothing, repeat nothing will ever get it out! Just play along and he will be happy!