Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Anomalies at the WTC and the Hutchison Effect
Options
-
13-01-2008 11:07pm#1
Comments
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Zipply please learn to use the quote function properly.
1. You claim that pentagon had "defenses" what were these defenses.
2. You claim passengers were coerced, into making calls, do you stand over this claim still?
3. The "nose out" story is nonsense. Thousands of eye witnesses saw the planes crash into the WTC. Claims that the footage has been altered come from people watching poorly compressed internet videos, with artifacting. I'm someone who regularly worked with uncompressed archived copies of the sept 11th footage, and I'm one of thousands of media workers who have access to the same footage, are we all "in on it"?
The US have claimed for years that anyone goes within protected airspace they can scramble fighter jets in a matter of minutes which will 'intercept' possible threats. What happened on this day?
Mossad claims they warned the US a threat was going to happen, which was ignored.
The planes appear in different colours within the different various 'amateur recordings', strange.
Im not saying your in on it, your probably not high enough up within the industry to know any of this happened. Just like with a political party, only the top people need to be under the control of the enemy, the rest follow orders like they are instructed.
How could a man in a cave mastermind all this??
0 -
-
-
Advertisement
-
The US have claimed for years that anyone goes within protected airspace they can scramble fighter jets in a matter of minutes which will 'intercept' possible threats. What happened on this day?
Really where did they make these claims? The best example of an intercept in US airspace was the payne stewart death. The plane traveling on a steady course with transponder on , and it took 80 minutes for an intercept to occur.
You've also explicitly mentioned the pentagon's defenses, so I'll ask again, what where theyMossad claims they warned the US a threat was going to happen, which was ignored.
Can you prove they were intentionally ignored, or just lost in the chatter about many other bogus or non existant threats?The planes appear in different colours within the different various 'amateur recordings', strange.
Im not saying your in on it, your probably not high enough up within the industry to know any of this happened. Just like with a political party, only the top people need to be under the control of the enemy, the rest follow orders like they are instructed.
zippy do you not see the paradox here?
You're suggesting that the video fakery was so amateurish anyone could spot it, but thousands of news and media workers, who regularly come in contact with the footage, are just worker ants who blindly ignore what is obvious to you, and CB_Brooklyn?
The different colours can be explained by incorrect colour balance on domestic video cameras.
You're also ignoring all the eye witnesses, thousands of them, how could the NWO ensure one of them wasn't videoing and captured the "missile"
hitting the WTC
How could a man in a cave mastermind all this??
Whats so difficult to mastermind, this was an extremely low tech affair?0 -
-
Really where did they make these claims? The best example of an intercept in US airspace was the payne stewart death. The plane traveling on a steady course with transponder on , and it took 80 minutes for an intercept to occur.
You've also explicitly mentioned the pentagon's defenses, so I'll ask again, what where they
Can you prove they were intentionally ignored, or just lost in the chatter about many other bogus or non existant threats?
zippy do you not see the paradox here?
You're suggesting that the video fakery was so amateurish anyone could spot it, but thousands of news and media workers, who regularly come in contact with the footage, are just worker ants who blindly ignore what is obvious to you, and CB_Brooklyn?
The different colours can be explained by incorrect colour balance on domestic video cameras.
You're also ignoring all the eye witnesses, thousands of them, how could the NWO ensure one of them wasn't videoing and captured the "missile"
hitting the WTC
Whats so difficult to mastermind, this was an extremely low tech affair?
Low tech affair?? The mind boggles with this statement.
Go try reinacting this, I'll pay the rent on your cave if you get away with it.
Most of the eyewitnesses interviewed worked for the broadcast companies, fact.
Many didnt know that a plane hit until hours later, some were sure it was a bomb, other heard a missile.
But, of course it was two planes, flown by amateurs, sure I saw it on TV.
0 -
-
Low tech affair?? The mind boggles with this statement.
Go try reinacting this, I'll pay the rent on your cave if you get away with it.
What was so hi tech? It required 19 zealots willing to die, small knifes, and an exploitive hole in the US air security.Most of the eyewitnesses interviewed worked for the broadcast companies, fact.
I'll assume you can support this with links and evidence.Many didnt know that a plane hit until hours later, some were sure it was a bomb, other heard a missile.
But, of course it was two planes, flown by amateurs, sure I saw it on TV.
And thousands more saw two planes with their own eyes.
But I'll not leave you on two points you seem eager to drop.
Thousands of people, with expertise in editing and special effects have access to uncompressed masters of the 911 footage, why haven't these people come forward to support your claims.
You made a specific claim about the pentagon's "defenses" I ask again, what were they?0 -
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
Advertisement