Logic Test

Jesus Wept

Question: Your woman is at the front door, whining to be let in, the dog is at the back door, whining to be let in.

Which do you let in, and (more importantly) why?

(I'll post the answer in spoilers after 10 responses).

smashey

Easy.

The dog. At least he'll shut up when he gets in.

admiralofthefleet

smashey wrote:

Easy.

The dog. At least he'll shut up when he gets in.

agreed,

plus dogs do things with gravy that my missus wouldnt

Jesus Wept

smashey wrote:

Easy.

The dog. At least he'll shut up when he gets in.

The force is strong in you

admiralofthefleet wrote:

agreed,

plus dogs do things with gravy that my missus wouldnt

I'm afraid to enquire further into that....

galwayrush

smashey wrote:

Easy.

The dog. At least he'll shut up when he gets in.

lol, Beat us all to it.:D

AlmightyCushion

All right, here's another. I had six cans of beer and I drink six cans of beer. What do I have left?

Duggy747

Another 4 cans of beer because by the time you got to your 3rd can you realised you needed to buy more beer!

AlmightyCushion

Duggy747 wrote:

Another 4 cans of beer because by the time you got to your 3rd can you realised you needed to buy more beer!

Good answer but not the one I'm thinking of.

TerrorFirmer

AlmightyCushion wrote:

All right, here's another. I had six cans of beer and I drink six cans of beer. What do I have left?

A nagging wife

smashey

Duggy747 wrote:

Another 4 cans of beer because by the time you got to your 3rd can you realised you needed to buy more beer!

I like this answer.

Slow Motion

Six cans and a beergut !

Zaph

Six empty cans, a barely quenched raging thirst and a sudden longing for a kebab.

WindSock

AlmightyCushion wrote:

All right, here's another. I had six cans of beer and I drink six cans of beer. What do I have left?

Genital Herpes.

The Bollox

AlmightyCushion wrote:

All right, here's another. I had six cans of beer and I drink six cans of beer. What do I have left?

YORE MA!






oh wait... this isn't AH

ansionnachclist

AlmightyCushion wrote:

All right, here's another. I had six cans of beer and I drink six cans of beer. What do I have left?

12 empty cans of beer.

jester77

**** it, just turn up the TV and say you never heard the bell. When the pizza guy arrives he can use his key to let her in and she can open the back door to let in the dog and while she's passing the fridge she can bring you a fresh beer!

The Bollox

jester77 wrote:

**** it, just turn up the TV and say you never heard the bell. When the pizza guy arrives he can use his key to let her in and she can open the back door to let in the dog and while she's passing the fridge she can bring you a fresh beer!

and she should be grateful we think about these things so much

Tar.Aldarion

I let either in, so we can have fantastic sex.

Kazobel

AlmightyCushion wrote:

All right, here's another. I had six cans of beer and I drink six cans of beer. What do I have left?

12 cans of beer left because you had the sense to buy a whole 24 can tray?

Jesus Wept

as my aussie friend used to say

'24 hours in a day, 24 cans in a tray'

Though, that would imply drinking 1 per hour for 24 hours, where as we brothers know that the optimum is to drink 3 - 6 CPH (cans per hour) over the course of 8 or 4 hours, and pass out.

Kazobel

The-Rigger wrote:

Though, that would suggest drinking 1 per hour for 24 hours, where as we brothers know that the optimum is to drink 3 - 6 over the course 8 to 4 hours, and pass out.

Wuss

Jesus Wept

6 CPH (cans per hour) or 1 can per 10 minutes, for 4 hours?

I think this is an acceptable level within the BGRH. It also doesn't account for eating & snacking, which is implied, as we are drinking, nay as we are breathing.



;)

Kazobel

The-Rigger wrote:

6 CPH (cans per hour) or 1 can per 10 minutes, for 4 hours?

I think this is an acceptable level within the BGRH. It also doesn't account for eating & snacking, which is implied, as we are drinking, nay as we are breathing.


;)

But you said drink 3 - 6 over 8 - 4 hours, you never said 6 an hour, maybe you meant that though so I'll let you away with it and assume it was a typo and retract my previous "wuss" and give you thumbs up

Jesus Wept

Kazobel wrote:

But you said drink 3 - 6 over 8 - 4 hours, you never said 6 an hour, maybe you meant that though so I'll let you away with it and assume it was a typo and retract my previous "wuss" and give you thumbs up

I meant exactly what I said woman!

You have even quoted me saying the exact thing you claim I didn't say?!

Between 3 and 6 cans per hour, depending on your mood.

There are 24 cans in the pack. Are you assuming that some of these cans would be left untouched?! If so, you need to read the stickies to get an idea of the forum you are in!

3 cans per hour would take 8 hours, 6 per hour would take 4 hours.

It's not rocket science, maybe you should take the impending BGRH logic class with the other gurlies, bless yiz.

Kazobel

The-Rigger wrote:

I meant exactly what I said woman!

You have even quoted me saying the exact thing you claim I didn't say?!

Between 3 and 6 cans per hour, depending on your mood.

There are 24 cans in the pack. Are you assuming that some of these cans would be left untouched?! If so, you need to read the stickies to get an idea of the forum you are in!

3 cans per hour would take 8 hours, 6 per hour would take 4 hours.

It's not rocket science, maybe you should take the impending BGRH logic class with the other gurlies, bless yiz.

But at no point does this:

The-Rigger wrote:

Though, that would suggest drinking 1 per hour for 24 hours, where as we brothers know that the optimum is to drink 3 - 6 over the course 8 to 4 hours, and pass out.

say "per hour", now I may be a woman but I don't know any gender that would see "3 - 6 over the course 8 to 4 hours" as " 3 - 6 per hour over the course of 8 hours or 6 per 4 hours" so lets just call it a typo and leave it at that honey or maybe the next logic test should be on how you get from your post to my translation and assume everybody should know what you mean

Jesus Wept

Kazobel wrote:

But at no point does this:



say "per hour", now I may be a woman but I don't know any gender that would see "3 - 6 over the course 8 to 4 hours" as " 3 - 6 per hour over the course of 8 hours or 6 per 4 hours" so lets just call it a typo and leave it at that honey or maybe the next logic test should be on how you get from your post to my translation and assume everybody should know what you mean

IT WOULDN'T BE 'CANS PER HOUR' IF IT WAS OVER 4 HOURS WOULD IT?! Do you know what per hour means?!

There is no typo.
I've tried to be nice, but my patience has run out, your stupidity knows no bounds, I hope your good at pouring beers, or you won't last around here.

Can you even read?!

My first post on the matter, READ SLOWWWLLYYYY

I hope your good looking, because when they were handing out brains.... good god


Can a brother step in and help this Kazobel imbecile out?

Question: Are you trolling now? Or are you really really really thick? It's one or the other.

Jesus Wept

Kazobel wrote:

But at no point does this:

Kazobel wrote:

Originally Posted by The-Rigger
Though, that would suggest drinking 1 per hour for 24 hours, where as we brothers know that the optimum is to drink 3 - 6 over the course 8 to 4 hours, and pass out.

say "per hour", now I may be a woman but I don't know any gender that would see "3 - 6 over the course 8 to 4 hours" as " 3 - 6 per hour over the course of 8 hours or 6 per 4 hours" so lets just call it a typo and leave it at that honey or maybe the next logic test should be on how you get from your post to my translation and assume everybody should know what you mean

Actual quote:

The-Rigger wrote:

Though, that would imply drinking 1 per hour for 24 hours, where as we brothers know that the optimum is to drink 3 - 6 CPH
(cans per hour) over the course of 8 or 4 hours, and pass out.

Do NOT edit quotes of people and then say they didn't what they did. I was being lighthearted upto a few posts ago, but this is bullsh1t, you can't edit words out and present it as a quote, I don't care what the subject matter.

Kazobel

The-Rigger wrote:

Actual quote:



Do NOT edit quotes of people and then say they didn't what they did. I was being lighthearted upto a few posts ago, but this is bullsh1t, you can't edit words out and present it as a quote, I don't care what the subject matter.

Kazobels Quote and answer to your first post on this thread 21:20, The- Riggers edit of said post 21.23 hahahahaha sad git, you edited your own post after I corrected you I would just die, die! die! die! how embarrassing, all you had to do was admit a typo

Kazobel

The-Rigger wrote:

Question: Are you trolling now? Or are you really really really thick? It's one or the other.

I think you really should ask yourself that question hon, I mean like it says when it's edited right at the bottom, did you think no-one would notice? lol

Jesus Wept

Kazobel wrote:

Kazobels Quote and answer to your first post on this thread 21:20, The- Riggers edit of said post 21.23 hahahahaha sad git, you edited your own post after I corrected you I would just die, die! die! die! how embarrassing, all you had to do was admit a typo

You are talking absoulte bull****.

I edited it 5 mins after posting to change/add a word, yes, I did this, and I didn't do it to try and put you off, the only
response you had made was lighthearted, I made the slight change because I felt it added something to my post.



Your post with your bullsh1t attempt at quoting was at 22:20


Clearly you copy and pasted your own quoting of my quote at this time, and not from my post (with slight modification I included at 21:23)

Kazobel

The-Rigger wrote:

You are talking absoulte bull****.

I edited it 5 mins after posting to change/add a word, yes, I did this, and I didn't do it to try and put you off, the only
response you had made was lighthearted, I made the slight change because I felt it added something to my post.



Your post with your bullsh1t attempt at quoting was at 22:20


Clearly you copy and pasted your own quoting of my quote at this time, and not the original (with slight modification I included at 21:23)

No, look at my post directly after your first one, that was never edited by me so I used that to get the original wording, ie the one before you edited yours, wanna a new shovel? that one's starting to look a bit blunt honey :D:D

The only thing your edit added to your post was correct grammer and proof I'm not lying :rolleyes:

Kazobel

The-Rigger wrote:

You are talking absoulte bull****.

I edited it 5 mins after posting to change/add a word, yes, I did this, and I didn't do it to try and put you off, the only
response you had made was lighthearted, I made the slight change because I felt it added something to my post.



Your post with your bullsh1t attempt at quoting was at 22:20


Clearly you copy and pasted your own quoting of my quote at this time, and not from my post (with slight modification I included at 21:23)

futher proof, I replied to your op at 21:20, you edited at 21:23 and then replied to me at 21:25 with your new "CPH" cr*p hahahaha just admit it, you were caught



:D:D

Jesus Wept

//sigh

You are missing every point.

I didn't make the edit to my post to trip you up, I wasn't 'caught', why the fúck do you think there is an 'edit' button.

In this post by you
http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=53914001&postcount=25

you have misquoted me, you made this post after my edit, this shows that you clearly copy and pasted the quote from your post, rather than going back to the source, edits occur, so you should always quote the source, not your own post. End of story.


You seem to of known what was going on for the last 20 posts, I've been constantly repeating myself and asking do you not understand what I'm saying, why didn't you just tell me what the issue was?

You're wasting my fúcking time, and we both look like total retards, so let's just fúcking drop it.

Kazobel wrote:

futher proof, I replied to your op at 21:20, you edited at 21:23 and then replied to me at 21:25 with your new "CPH" cr*p hahahaha just admit it, you were caught

You are still missing the point, I didn't realise this is what the fúck you were talking about till about 3 posts ago, if you just fúcking stated it we could of avoided all this bullsh1t.

Seriously, we both have come off as complete tards, I've being asking you for 25 posts to explain why you were confused, you argued for 20 posts before telling me, you're a fúcking clown.

Kazobel

The-Rigger wrote:

//sigh

You are missing every point.

I didn't make the edit to my post to trip you up, I wasn't 'caught', why the fúck do you think there is an 'edit' button.

In this post by you
http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=53914001&postcount=25

you have misquoted me, you made this post after my edit, this shows that you clearly copy and pasted the quote from your post, rather than going back to the source, edits occur, so you should always quote the source, not your own post. End of story.

But I made this post http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=53913606&postcount=21 before your edit so yeah I did copy and paste from my post which was quoted from your source before you edited it to suit your next reply 2 minutes later. I would have quoted the source if it wasn't changed to suit your lie which I have more than pointed out was a lie. Not end of story, I'm by no means finished yet.

The-Rigger wrote:

You seem to of known what was going on for the last 20 posts, I've been constantly repeating myself and asking do you not understand what I'm saying, why didn't you just tell me what the issue was?

But I did, you changed your original post to suit you after I called you a wuss because you made a typo and I read it wrong so then when you clarified I retracted the wuss comment and gave you a thumbs up BUT NO you wanted more so tough ****, you did it not me, you could have left this at any time fcuk knows I gave you enough outs and still you're like a dog with a bone, grant it a well buried bone (since thats how deep you dug yourself on this thread) but a bone none the less

The-Rigger wrote:

You're wasting my fúcking time, and we both look like total retards, so let's just fúcking drop it.

No, you look like a retard, I look like I'm having fun since I'm right and have proved it like...what... 5 times so far?

The-Rigger wrote:

You are still missing the point, I didn't realise this is what the fúck you were talking about till about 3 posts ago, if you just fúcking stated it we could of avoided all this bullsh1t.

What are you talking about here, you editing your post to try make it look like I was lying when actually you just wasted a thread denying that you edited it to suit you just so you wouldn't be seen as beaten by a girl? all you had to do was admit the typo and instead turned it into this :rolleyes:

The-Rigger wrote:

Seriously, we both have come off as complete tards, I've being asking you for 25 posts to explain why you were confused, you argued for 20 posts before telling me, you're a fúcking clown.

No seriously, the only one that came off as a "tard" or a "f*cking clown" really is you and the fact you have no better comeback now but to resort to insults proves it since you know I'm right, I was very explanatory in all my posts and you know it

This is tedious and has no place in BGRH. Rounds on me at the bar Rigger.

Dr. Loon

Kazobel wrote:

But I made this post http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=53913606&postcount=21 before your edit so yeah I did copy and paste from my post which was quoted from your source before you edited it to suit your next reply 2 minutes later. I would have quoted the source if it wasn't changed to suit your lie which I have more than pointed out was a lie. Not end of story, I'm by no means finished yet.




But I did, you changed your original post to suit you after I called you a wuss because you made a typo and I read it wrong so then when you clarified I retracted the wuss comment and gave you a thumbs up BUT NO you wanted more so tough ****, you did it not me, you could have left this at any time fcuk knows I gave you enough outs and still you're like a dog with a bone, grant it a well buried bone (since thats how deep you dug yourself on this thread) but a bone none the less



No, you look like a retard, I look like I'm having fun since I'm right and have proved it like...what... 5 times so far?





What are you talking about here, you editing your post to try make it look like I was lying when actually you just wasted a thread denying that you edited it to suit you just so you wouldn't be seen as beaten by a girl? all you had to do was admit the typo and instead turned it into this :rolleyes:



No seriously, the only one that came off as a "tard" or a "f*cking clown" really is you and the fact you have no better comeback now but to resort to insults proves it since you know I'm right, I was very explanatory in all my posts and you know it

Gentlemen. I've never posted here before but have enjoyed reading your insightful commentary. May I suggest that these two bitches be banned? Fúckin idiots.

Jesus Wept

Read this, s l o w l y

Kazobel wrote:

But I made this post http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showp...6&postcount=21 before your edit so yeah I did copy and paste from my post which was quoted from your source before you edited it to suit your next reply 2 minutes later. I would have quoted the source if it wasn't changed to suit your lie which I have more than pointed out was a lie. Not end of story, I'm by no means finished yet.

I did not change my post because of a thing you said, don't get ahead of yourself. I hadn't even refreshed the page and/or noted your response was 3 minutes prior to my edit to my post. (some of us
are doing other **** while using boards in the background

You seem to think that I took offense to your 'wuss' post and having 'lieing' :rolleyes:.

You decided that there was some understanding between us that I was trying to decieve you.

I've being asking you from the get-go what the fúck was confusing you.
How many times did I ask you before you told me that the edit was the confusion between us?!
If you had stated it once we could of avoided this bullsh1t that has made us both more dumb for the experience.



I would suggest you go to The Thunderdome, it's a forum where people can argue and attempt to piss each other off to their hearts content.

That is not the purpose of this forum, read the stickies, you have no clue what forum you are in.

There are next to zero arguments in this forum, we get along, we have fun, it is not for the purpose that you seem to think it is.

Jesus Wept

Dr. Loon wrote:

Gentlemen. I've never posted here before but have enjoyed reading your insightful commentary. May I suggest that these two bitches be banned? Fúckin idiots.

May I suggest I meet you outside YORE MA's where I will pummel the bejaysais out of you, then take YORE MA into the snug of YORE MA'S and pummell her with my penis?

Kazobel

Dr. Loon wrote:

Gentlemen. I've never posted here before but have enjoyed reading your insightful commentary. May I suggest that these two bitches be banned? Fúckin idiots.

Hell I enjoy it on here too and although you are all sexist, chubby ****ers I still like the banter and have proved it on other threads where I can be as rude as any of you but that **** was just irritating. I'll leave it now because it's not worth a banning for, I'm off to Yore Ma's then maybe Yore Sisters if I'm not bolloxed after Yore Ma

HAPPYGIRL

Rigg we're in the bar if you want to join us. Or just need a break from needlessly defending yourself all night. your round mr

Kazobel

The-Rigger wrote:

Read this, s l o w l y





I did not change my post because of a thing you said, don't get ahead of yourself. I hadn't even refreshed the page and/or noted your response was 3 minutes prior to my edit to my post. (some of us
are doing other **** while using boards in the background

You seem to think that I took offense to your 'wuss' post and having 'lieing' :rolleyes:.

You decided that there was some understanding between us that I was trying to decieve you.

I've being asking you from the get-go what the fúck was confusing you.
How many times did I ask you before you told me that the edit was the confusion between us?!
If you had stated it once we could of avoided this bullsh1t that has made us both more dumb for the experience.



I would suggest you go to The Thunderdome, it's a forum where people can argue and attempt to piss each other off to their hearts content.

That is not the purpose of this forum, read the stickies, you have no clue what forum you are in.

There are next to zero arguments in this forum, we get along, we have fun, it is not for the purpose that you seem to think it is.

Look as far as I'm concerned I proved my point, let it go :rolleyes:

We should rally the strike team on these clowns:D

Jesus Wept

Kazobel wrote:

Hell I enjoy it on here too and although you are all sexist, chubby ****ers I still like the banter and have proved it on other threads where I can be as rude as any of you but that **** was just irritating. I'll leave it now because it's not worth a banning for, I'm off to Yore Ma's then maybe Yore Sisters if I'm not bolloxed after Yore Ma

you should try YORE A HEAD WRECKING CúNT's it's near YORE MA's, you'd enjoy it.

Kazobel

Kazobel wrote:

Look as far as I'm concerned I proved my point, let it go :rolleyes:

Riggers right. Take it to the thunderdrome. BGRH is not a place for arguments. We drink copious amounts of alcohol and make fun of metrosexual gimps.

Kazobel

The-Rigger wrote:

you should try YORE A HEAD WRECKING CúNT's it's near YORE MA's, you'd enjoy it.

You should try kissing my ass but I'm pretty sure you couldn't reach that high :rolleyes:

Jesus Wept

Kazobel wrote:

You should try kissing my ass but I'm pretty sure you couldn't reach that high :rolleyes:

I'm 5'11, are you insinuating that you are monstrously tall?

I wouldn't go near YORE SMELLY FAT OLD RANCID ARSE, it's a terrible establishment.

Kazobel

The-Rigger wrote:

I'm 5'11, are you insinuating that you are monstrously tall?

I wouldn't go near YORE SMELLY FAT OLD RANCID ARSE, it's a terrible establishment.

No, that you're irrelevantly small,

I'd never go near YORE SMELLY FAT OLD RANCID ARSE either because I heard it was one of the cheapier, tackier holes the people that own Yore Ma owns, actually now that I think about it maybe they were talking about Yore Ma

Jesus Wept

Kazobel wrote:

No, that you're irrelevantly small,

I'd never go near YORE SMELLY FAT OLD RANCID ARSE because I heard it was one of the cheapier, tackier holes Yore Ma owns

I'm 5'11, as stated.

Try reading.

Kazobel

The-Rigger wrote:

I'm 5'11, as stated.

Try reading.

And what's your point? you're still irrelevant

Jesus Wept

Kazobel wrote:

And what's your point? you're still irrelevant

How about this, a poll is started here in BGRH for BGRH members to vote on, and one of us shall be kicked out?

A vote by our peers? (they would probably happily boot us both out after this thread, but their option shall be one of us to go)


Is that relevant enough??

HAPPYGIRL

no way.
this thread was too pathetic rigger you are a bgrh member all the way.
wimmin backing you but i'm sure on this occasion the men will rally too.
no worries pet and do not post a poll.