Nosebleed stakes discussion thread!

phantom_lord

IHAVEACAT wrote:

well then 1 tread shud be enuf for 3 bettng or final table tourny hands. etc etc. its not clogging up the forum.

don't be silly. the forum is here for that type of dicussion.

dont read it if u dont want to. when a thread says Full Tilt High Stakes Action you cant open it and be angry when you dont find sum1 asking for advice on if they shud fold js in this spot u should say i have no interest in reading that so i wont look at it. but all the people who have no interest in it seem to read it and kick up a fuss bout it therefore taking a interest in the thread irrevelant of its content

It's the fact that the forum is filling up more and more with low content drivel, and is a shadow of what it used to be, a lot of the old good posters have stopped posting, and we're left with noobs posting about pointless stuff like this!

If you want to read about high stakes hands go here, it's far more interesting. or even here if the previous one makes your head hurt.

Ste05

People can we please get over it, FFS, it's one thread, Get over it!

The place isn't getting like some sort of concentration camp the way some people are going on.

These games don't run all the time, and I miss them so often, I would love to have watched the IDOJ v PA/Aba/Durrr but missed it. e.g. Right now there's no High Stakes games going on, except for one table with Mark Vos and CTS sitting in a couple of 100/200 tables waiting for action.

Seriously is you don't like this thread, think it's worthless, whatever, if that's the case, DON'T OPEN THE THREAD!! It's clearly marked so everyone has been warned what is contained in here.

If I see a thread about how some random (to me) person won some tournament or satellite, I couldn't care less and don't open the thread, similarly if I see a thread about some tournament running somewhere, if I didn't have to check it complies with the charter, I wouldn't open it. So can everyone else please do the same.

Hopefully this is the end of this discussion, and now the rest of us can go back to indulging our selfish enjoyment of "Hello magazine" type poker discussion.

Thank you.

Ste

Also there's no need to clog up the stickies with this, as it is low content and the BBV thread is always there, if this discussion can end, this thread might just die naturally as alot of people would like.

MrPillowTalk

Ste05 wrote:

People can we please get over it, FFS, it's one thread, Get over it!

The place isn't getting like some sort of concentration camp the way some people are going on.

These games don't run all the time, and I miss them so often, I would love to have watched the IDOJ v PA/Aba/Durrr but missed it. e.g. Right now there's no High Stakes games going on, except for one table with Mark Vos and CTS sitting in a couple of 100/200 tables waiting for action.

Seriously is you don't like this thread, think it's worthless, whatever, if that's the case, DON'T OPEN THE THREAD!! It's clearly marked so everyone has been warned what is contained in here.

If I see a thread about how some random (to me) person won some tournament or satellite, I couldn't care less and don't open the thread, similarly if I see a thread about some tournament running somewhere, if I didn't have to check it complies with the charter, I wouldn't open it. So can everyone else please do the same.

Hopefully this is the end of this discussion, and now the rest of us can go back to indulging our selfish enjoyment of "Hello magazine" type poker discussion.

Thank you.

Ste

I never said it should be baned lol Im just illustrating how the forum has taken a dive quality wise, I dont know how you miss the high stakes games ste the 200/400 been running every night for months

Imposter

phantom_lord wrote:

because people don't want to see pointless boring ot threads clogging up the forum and removing the space for threads with content. one thread is enough for this stuff, we hardly need a thread everytime PA wins a pot.

anyway, these guys play everyday of the week, it's super standard.

Well I find most hand history threads boring. You want to discuss situations in poker fine but there is so much information not provided and so many "it depends" answers that can be given to every HH thread that they are also clogging up the forum imo.

Granted this FT stuff should be in the same thread as it pretty much was the same match but that doesn't mean that next weeks should be moved into this thread.

IHAVEACAT

MrPillowTalk wrote:

Do you have anything constructive to add to this forum? Havent seen a post from you yet that isnt pure noise the above one is the best I think, railbirding ft > theory threads, why dont you just open the tv guide and see what time the poker is on tv rather than blocking up the forum with this drivel.

i doubt any leaks or problems in my game, any hands im having trouble with could be helped by you. i get something out of this forum and so do u. if you try not to ruin what i get out of it ill try not to ruin what u get out of it. but if people want to talk about high stakes action why is it such a problem.i didnt make a personal attack on you but yet you seem to feel your justified in yours on me.

Ste05

MrPillowTalk wrote:

I never said it should be baned lol Im just illustrating how the forum has taken a dive quality wise, I dont know how you miss the high stakes games ste the 200/400 been running every night for months

Yeah, I know I completely agree with the quality angle and if we get the High Content forum hopefully that will end that problem or at least alleviate it somewhat.

I miss the action because most of the time I'm not bothered TBH, it's just when certain players are playing that I have a morbid curiosity. Similarly to only watching certain sport teams etc....

MrPillowTalk

IHAVEACAT wrote:

i doubt any leaks or problems in my game, any hands im having trouble with could be helped by you. i get something out of this forum and so do u. if you try not to ruin what i get out of it ill try not to ruin what u get out of it. but if people want to talk about high stakes action why is it such a problem.i didnt make a personal attack on you but yet you seem to feel your justified in yours on me.

Its not a personal attack, its an observation, you never add anything but noise to the forum.

Im sure I could helo you with leaks and problems in your game, if I chose to, however thats not the point.

IHAVEACAT

MrPillowTalk wrote:

Its not a personal attack, its an observation, you never add anything but noise to the forum.

Im sure I could helo you with leaks and problems in your game, if I chose to, however thats not the point.

doubtful but anyway mpt didnt you notice what this thread is for.

oh and i found these in your previous threads. very high content mpt

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055009927&referrerid=&highlight=

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2054924935&referrerid=&highlight=




mark vos has about 120k vs a hoffman in some 200 400 action. ship it holla

Chucky the tree

My dads bigger then your dad.

IHAVEACAT

Chucky the tree wrote:

My dads bigger then your dad.

i know i feel so dirty getting into tit for tat crap but jeezzzzz just let people talk bout what tey want

MrPillowTalk

IHAVEACAT wrote:

doubtful but anyway mpt didnt you notice what this thread is for.

oh and i found these in your previous threads. very high content mpt

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055009927&referrerid=&highlight=

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2054924935&referrerid=&highlight=




mark vos has about 120k vs a hoffman in some 200 400 action. ship it holla

I dont recall ever saying Ive never made a low content post, Ive made plenty. I was talking about the overall quality of the forum taking a dive.

I have 1500 posts in the forum and you found 2 low content posts, both not even from this year, and one of which was actually showing a savage bluff I think its stretching it a bit to imply Im in the habit of making low content posts.

I never made any sort of personal attack on you I merely passed an observation on the FACT that you contribute nothing here.

You are a tard Im not sure why Im even responding to this you quite obviously dont have the required grey matter to achieve any level of understanding, allthough on the plus side at least youll have plenty of room in that empty skull of yours for remembering the names of all the famous players and writing stuff like "X pwns Y omg he won a pot umhuh" while no doubt masturbating in front of the pc screen, Id say it worries your mother that she finds pics of sbrugby and durr saved on your harddrive as opposed to playboy et al.

Rb

phantom_lord wrote:

If you want to read about high stakes hands go here, it's far more interesting. or even here if the previous one makes your head hurt.

In fairness, one could just as easily turn around and say "If you want to read about strategy, go here, its far more interesting and there's probably a lot more solid advice."

I suppose its about achieving a balance between high and low content threads.

Fully agree with Ste05, if you don't like the sounds of it, then don't open the thread. Same goes for every thread, on every forum on this website.

MrPillowTalk wrote:

You are a tard Im not sure why Im even responding to this you quite obviously dont have the required grey matter to achieve any level of understanding, allthough on the plus side at least youll have plenty of room in that empty skull of yours for remembering the names of all the famous players and writing stuff like "X pwns Y omg he won a pot umhuh" while no doubt masturbating in front of the pc screen, Id say it worries your mother that she finds pics of sbrugby and durr saved on your harddrive as opposed to playboy et al.

Lol.

phantom_lord

rb_ie wrote:

In fairness, one could just as easily turn around and say "If you want to read about strategy, go here, its far more interesting and there's probably a lot more solid advice.

i do go there and for that reason. and I can't wait til I start beating 2/4+ so I can start posting in msnl.

IHAVEACAT

MrPillowTalk wrote:

I dont recall ever saying Ive never made a low content post, Ive made plenty. I was talking about the overall quality of the forum taking a dive.

I have 1500 posts in the forum and you found 2 low content posts, both not even from this year, and one of which was actually showing a savage bluff I think its stretching it a bit to imply Im in the habit of making low content posts.

I never made any sort of personal attack on you I merely passed an observation on the FACT that you contribute nothing here.

You are a tard Im not sure why Im even responding to this you quite obviously dont have the required grey matter to achieve any level of understanding, allthough on the plus side at least youll have plenty of room in that empty skull of yours for remembering the names of all the famous players and writing stuff like "X pwns Y omg he won a pot umhuh" while no doubt masturbating in front of the pc screen, Id say it worries your mother that she finds pics of sbrugby and durr saved on your harddrive as opposed to playboy et al.

this is getting pathetic. ill pm u

Solksjaer

the other thread is locked. :mad: ...congrats to roy the boy. who is now bankrolled for the 300 600 on Fulltilt....

IHAVEACAT - the poor moggy :-)
Mr pillowtalk - the poor pillow :-)

FYI Pwn'd means to sell personal items so you can play poker.....


Now for my question....Are any of the pros who play online sponsored to play...(excuse the silly question I'm wondering)

thread will probably self-lock in 5 minutes....

Ste05

I'm going to lock this thread, if and when there is another interesting session the likes of the last week with this IDreamofJenna or an interesting HU battle between aba/durrr/PA/grim/CTS/etc. that someone wants to discuss, it will be allowed and that will then become the official FT Nose Bleed thread. And there shouldn't be a need for a repeat of this.



Mr. PillowTalk,

Consider this a formal warning for personal abuse, a second offence will be dealt with by a 1 week ban.