The Funny Side of Religion

recedite

These subtle links I remember when they all started with http and were typed in blue ink!

Pushtrak

One for those who watch youtube atheist videos, and those who like amusing songs.

keppler

you've all probably seen this one before

Pushtrak

keppler wrote: »

you've all probably seen this one before
http://www.project-reason.org/images/gallery3/bc_2.jpg

I hadn't, anyway.

Galvasean

Never seen that before. is there a way of seeing it in full size? (planet size)

Pushtrak

Here. Not going to post it direct for obvious reasons.

Delirium

Galvasean wrote: »

Never seen that before. is there a way of seeing it in full size? (planet size)

only able to find a segment of it that's readable.

Galvasean

Pushtrak wrote: »

Here. Not going to post it direct for obvious reasons.

That's amazing. I mean, even if 99% could be debunked* that's stillan awful lot of contracdictions!

*I'm not necessarily saying they can, just hypothetically

seamus

The fact that the diagram is pleasing to the eye is the ultimate proof that God must have purposely engineered those contradictions to appear in the bible. How else can it be explained?

recedite

I think it signifies fire and brimstone raining down on the smartarse heretics. Its a warning from God not to ask too many awkward questions, or He roasts your ass.

ColmDawson

A couple of segments from Ricky Gervais' new show, Science.

Skip to 1:18

sponsoredwalk

If anyone gets a humongous version of that contradictions picture please
post it! It just reminds me of that huge deadly evolution tree poster that is
in the JC thread :P Imagine a billboard covered in those two posters only,
do you think A&A should put in a pool of money & buy advertising space
to put them up, half & half, on a billboard beside each other? :pac:



&



on a billboard side by side, I'm sure it's cheap enough & is right in
accord with Irish family values :pac:

mewso

While the Conradictions picture is "Interesting Stuff" it's not what I would call "Funny". Hint hint.

keppler

Galvasean wrote: »

That's amazing. I mean, even if 99% could be debunked* that's stillan awful lot of contracdictions!

*I'm not necessarily saying they can, just hypothetically

Without mentioning any names, we all know theres a few from the christianity forum that will give it a good go!

Pushtrak

sponsoredwalk wrote: »

If anyone gets a humongous version of that contradictions picture please

I posted a link to a huge version of it (post #2827), but because of its size, I decided against posting it here.

http://www.thealmightyguru.com/Atheism/Images/BibleContradictions-ReasonProject.png

The Mad Hatter

Pope Invokes Papal Infallibility to win Vatican Pub Quiz

The Pope has enraged Vatican theologians, after invoking his own powers of infallibility in order to win the most recent Vatican pub quiz.

The row began after the Pope insisted that the Amazon is the longest river in the world in answer to a tie-break question, which was needed after he and his aides tied with a group of priests from Spain.

Despite insistence from the Spanish team that the Nile is the longest river on earth, a position backed up with evidence from books, encyclopedias, the Internet, and even satellite imagery, the quiz-master was left with little choice but to declare the Pope the winner.

sponsoredwalk

http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2010/11/30/dueling-billboards-face-off-in-christmas-controversy/
(Watch the video).

coffee_cake

vibe666

keppler

sponsoredwalk wrote: »

http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2010/11/30/dueling-billboards-face-off-in-christmas-controversy/
(Watch the video).

Hah..... president of the catholic league says evolution is a fairytale......'the king kong theory' :rolleyes:

keppler

robindch

Ken Ham, owner of "Answers In Genesis", the main creodrivel site in the USA and who opened up the notorious "Creation Museum" a few years back, announced yesterday that he wants to build a replica of Noah's Ark costing $25 million dollars. The press release is here:

http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/2010/12/01/ark-encounter-news-release

The project's website is here and there's a "dove's eye view" of the current plan is available here.

So what after the ark? A model of the universe complete with flat earth and suspended water canopy, a la Genesis 1:6–8, I hope.

Galvasean

I think we are missing an important point. How many dollars did Noah spend on his Ark?

Galvasean

keppler wrote: »

Without mentioning any names, we all know theres a few from the christianity forum that will give it a good go!

Something for them to do while we're away on the 17th.

ColmDawson

robindch wrote: »

Ken Ham, owner of "Answers In Genesis", the main creodrivel site in the USA and who opened up the notorious "Creation Museum" a few years back, announced yesterday that he wants to build a replica of Noah's Ark costing $25 million dollars. The press release is here:

http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/2010/12/01/ark-encounter-news-release

The project's website is here and there's a "dove's eye view" of the current plan is available here.

So what after the ark? A model of the universe complete with flat earth and suspended water canopy, a la Genesis 1:6–8, I hope.

According to the site, a $1,000 dollar donation will provide a plank for the Ark. I would've thought the creationist community has enough planks already.

GO_Bear

ColmDawson wrote: »

According to the site, a $1,000 dollar donation will provide a plank for the Ark. I would've thought the creationist community has enough planks already.

1000 for one plank ?

Genghiz Cohen

GO_Bear wrote: »

1000 for one plank ?

100 for a peg!

philologos

Galvasean wrote: »

That's amazing. I mean, even if 99% could be debunked* that's stillan awful lot of contracdictions!

*I'm not necessarily saying they can, just hypothetically

One of them was the one posted by robindch a few days ago which Wicknight is still latching on to despite others giving an explanation. There are numerous other passages there that are listed as contradictions which could be gone through.

Although, when you are dealing with "The Reason Project" it isn't worth the effort going through them one by one when there is another site that probably goes through them already. I guess I value original work if I am to contribute original work of my own! :pac:

Galvasean

Jakkass wrote: »

One of them was the one posted by robindch a few days ago which Wicknight is still latching on to despite others giving an explanation. There are numerous other passages there that are listed as contradictions which could be gone through.

Although, when you are dealing with "The Reason Project" it isn't worth the effort going through them one by one when there is another site that probably goes through them already. I guess I value original work if I am to contribute original work of my own! :pac:

Chicken... BUWWWAAAWWWWKKK!!!!!!

do it! go through them all! :pac:

philologos

My effort has value. This is why I only give original work for original work! I like to think those who I discuss with put the same effort into their posts as I do