OJ Simpson 'admits' to murder in new book.

ferdi · 23-10-2006 3:17pm

nordberg, nordberg, nordberg...sign

23-10-2006 3:41pm

Well..

If the glove fits.

Maximilian · 23-10-2006 5:12pm

Sounds as blatently retrospectively opportunistic as Hitlers lesser known work, "Ich liebe Juden"

Sofaspud · 23-10-2006 5:21pm

Goodshape wrote:

That's right. Back to bed everybody, your government has figured out how it all transpired.. no need for independent thought here, everything is under control.

What time's Gladiators on at?

You see, uhh, what happened was, uhh, the sound of the gunshots, uhh, ricoched off the, uhh, building, so he was, uhh, leaning back to ask what that sound was.

strassenwolf · 23-10-2006 6:37pm

But I don't understand where he can find the time to get involved in writing books.

He said after the trial that he was going to devote the rest of his life to finding the "real" killers. That must be a very time-consuming task.

But, keep at it OJ. I'm sure we all wish you every success.:p

lomb · 23-10-2006 6:44pm

i dont think he feels alot of remorse for killing them which is very sad. even if he killed them in the heat of the moment 'accidentally' he wouldnt be doing all these distasteful things.
i dont think he will admit to it even though there is the double jeopardy rule. if they changed the law like they did in the uk, he would be screwed.
but he definately killed them, any fool looking at the evidence would conclude that, he literally got away with double murder. where is columbo when u need him

Dave! · 23-10-2006 6:50pm

strassenwolf wrote:

But I don't understand where he can find the time to get involved in writing books.

He said after the trial that he was going to devote the rest of his life to finding the "real" killers. That must be a very time-consuming task.

But, keep at it OJ. I'm sure we all wish you every success.:p

Indeed, chasing one's tail is surely a tiresome task!

Mossy Monk · 24-10-2006 12:25am

lomb wrote:

any fool looking at the evidence would conclude that, he literally got away with double murder

who needs a jury when the world has you

MrJoeSoap · 24-10-2006 12:31am

http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/Simpson/OJFIND2.jpg

monkeyfudge · 24-10-2006 12:38am

Ruu wrote:

MSNBC for starters. Sure, he'll probably drop into Eason signing copies of the book then we can all have a look at him.

Actually wasn't it Denis Penis or someone like that who got him to sign an autograph and then they walked away from him towards the camera and unfolded to paper to show 'I DID IT' with OJ's signature at the bottom.

Dave! · 24-10-2006 8:30am

monkeyfudge wrote:

Actually wasn't it Denis Penis or someone like that who got him to sign an autograph and then they walked away from him towards the camera and unfolded to paper to show 'I DID IT' with OJ's signature at the bottom.

ROFL! Quality.

\m/_(>_<)_\m/ · 24-10-2006 8:39am

lomb wrote:

but he definately killed them, any fool looking at the evidence would conclude that,

its a pitty the police didn't think that before they started planting more "evidence" to make doubly sure he wouldn't walk...

and as soon as the planted evidence was discovered and exposed, sure he could not be convicted. who was to know what evidance was real and what evidence was planted by police.

Capt'n Midnight · 16-11-2006 1:43am

The family sued him and win a $33.5 million award from a wrongful death suit.

How can he earn any money till he has paid off that ?

TBH
OJ vowed to find the real killer.

MFJ · 16-11-2006 5:32am

Feral Mutant wrote:

He doesn't really need ro write it from a "hypothetical" point of view. In the US you can't be charged with the same murder twice so he can literally dance on Nicole Brown and Ronald Goldman's graves singing "I killed them" and nothing would happen, afaik anyway.

yeah its called "double Jeoparody" and it goes for any crime.....once you have been found innocent they can not be tried for the same crime, but hypotheticly if he was only charged with nicole's murder, then wrote the book, he could then be tried for Ron Goldman's murder and the book would be uesd as evidence against him.

Our man in Havana · 16-11-2006 8:11am

He was charged with both murders actually.

Heisenberg. · 16-11-2006 11:51am

This post has been deleted.

CountryWise · 16-11-2006 12:38pm

the thing i find funny was he was done for nothing, surely a high speed police chase along a major road should have some kind of penalty in itself without even bringing murder into it!

Sp@rtacus · 16-11-2006 12:47pm

He's been at this sort of caper for years. He has a show in the States called "Juiced" (as in OJ, Orange Juiced... :rolleyes:) which is kind of like "Punk'd" only it's AAaaawful :eek: (well even more awful than Punkd

) Apart from the total cringeworthy not-even-slightly-amusing nature of it, he has sketches which include him trying to sell a pair of leather gloves to random passers-by with the lines "they're great for getting a good strong grip on things, see how well these fit me etc" and trying to sell the white Bronco that he fled in, pointing out bullet holes and other such things. Sickening.

\m/_(>_<)_\m/ · 16-11-2006 12:48pm

CountryWise wrote:

the thing i find funny was he was done for nothing, surely a high speed police chase along a major road should have some kind of penalty in itself without even bringing murder into it!

high speed...HIGHSPEED,
did you see the footage of the " high speed " chase.
in one clip you can see an old woman power walking past the OJ's jeep as he is been perused you the whole of the police force.

CountryWise · 16-11-2006 3:35pm

ok fair enough i may be wrong it wasnt high speed but still he didnt stop for the police......

claire-g · 21-11-2006 3:30pm

Just heard on the news that:

Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation and Fox television have abandoned plans to publish a book by, and television interview with, OJ Simpson in which he describes how he would have killed his ex-wife.

Best decision they ever made!!!!