Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Another bright idea from government

Options
«13

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 3,095 ✭✭✭ANXIOUS


    Wow, they've lost the plot.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭amcalester


    Another step closer to permanent tenancies.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,003 ✭✭✭handlemaster


    This is just ridiculous its like every new idea has to point a stick at the landlords. What is the point of this if not just to try and make it as difficult for landlords as possible. There is no point for this


  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    So they tell the tenancy board first who will then send a letter to the tenant advising them of what they should expect next ,

    Seems reasonable


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,245 ✭✭✭myshirt


    Gatling wrote: »
    So they tell the tenancy board first who will then send a letter to the tenant advising them of what they should expect next ,

    Seems reasonable

    Yes, as if the time you need them out by isn't long enough already. It's a transfer of a government problem onto the private landlord. It's wrong. It diminishes property rights. The government can sit around scratching their stones while the landlord loses more money. Yeah that makes sense.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    myshirt wrote: »
    Yes, as if the time you need them out by isn't long enough already. It's a transfer of a government problem onto the private landlord. It's wrong. It diminishes property rights. The government can sit around scratching their stones while the landlord loses more money. Yeah that makes sense.

    I think people are jumping the gun here , how will a letter from the tenancy board telling tenants what and how to proceed when they leaving going to cost you or others money ,


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,671 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sad Professor


    I don't see how this advocates over-holding or will hurt landlords, except maybe lazy ones. The idea is that the RTB can contact the soon-to-be evicted tenant offering "guidance". Maybe they'll get a "Welcome to homelessness" pack encouraging them to consider other options, like moving back home, moving to the west, or emigrating. :pac: But seriously, it's pretty pointless and is unlikely to have any effect except kill more time while Eoghan and Leo work on their spin machine.

    Indefinite and sitting tenancies are the norm in many European countries and even some North American cities and are going to happen here too. It's only a matter of time and will be necessary to pacify would-be homeowners who will be mighty pissed when the penny finally drops that they'll never own their own home and will be stuck in Ireland's stinking rental sector for the rest of their lives. But as with rent control, FG's ideology and/or paralysis means that it when it eventually comes it will probably be in the form of rushed emergency legislation that will make matters worse and be vulnerable to constitutional challenge.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,003 ✭✭✭handlemaster


    Gatling wrote: »
    myshirt wrote: »
    Yes, as if the time you need them out by isn't long enough already. It's a transfer of a government problem onto the private landlord. It's wrong. It diminishes property rights. The government can sit around scratching their stones while the landlord loses more money. Yeah that makes sense.

    I think people are jumping the gun here , how will a letter from the tenancy board telling tenants what and how to proceed when they leaving going to cost you or others money ,

    Dont worry their working on it


  • Registered Users Posts: 834 ✭✭✭GGTrek


    I went to the source of the news:
    http://www.housing.gov.ie/housing/homelessness/statement-minister-eoghan-murphy-following-housing-summit

    The relevant paragraphs for landlords:
    "Landlords, when issuing a Notice of Termination to a tenant will be required to notify the RTB. The RTB will write to each tenant providing them with advice and guidance, including the name and contact details of the relevant local authority officials to contact if they are having difficulty in accessing alternative accommodation. This will facilitate a risk-based targeting of tenancy sustainment efforts and early responses to prevent homelessness, and provide for the development of more proactive LA actions thanks to direct sharing of data.
    The new inter-agency group will roll-out and oversee a targeted national awareness campaign for homelessness prevention, promoting available services, including the Tenancy Protection Service. (This will include using online and digital channels to prevent homelessness for those who are not yet at a point of crisis that would require phone or face to face advice)
    Homeless HAP supports will continue to be used as an intervention and prevention tool to allow tenants to remain in their tenancies where possible. The HAP Place Finder Service is being rolled out nationally to each of the 31 local authorities to target HAP supported rental properties for households in emergency accommodation. Place Finders assist in finding suitable accommodation and assisting with the deposit and first month’s rent. Additional people are being allocated to the Place Finder Services in Dublin."

    RTB pre-notification means: more bureaucracy, more time and therefore more costs added. Unless I can do it online on the RTB portal. If it is the usual b....it paper format with solicitor countersigning statutory declaration then they are just taking the proverbial ....
    Tenancy Protection Service: more money for Threshold and the likes.
    Finally they are just going to put into law the recent judgement on HAP: tenant enters as working one, stops or reduces working, forces landlord to accept HAP (another one sided govvie scheme)

    My main worry is that once they open the feast again at the Oireachtas  (they will have to) all sorts of whackos TDs and interested parties will join the feast to screw even more the landlords hiding behind the homeless excuse but in reality pushing their communist/socialist agenda. Their main target will clearly be the removal of as many termination notices as possible especially the ones with no reasons given (first 6 months and section 34(b) exactly as AAA and Sinn Feinn tried in January. Will it help to reduce homelessness? The answer is a resounding NO, but it looks good on the sold out media.

    I hope to be wrong, but as usual hope for the best and prepare for the worst.


  • Registered Users Posts: 992 ✭✭✭jamesthepeach


    So is this notifying of revenue effective immediately or is it just a kite for now?
    There I was thinking maybe they have thought about things and maybe this announcement would be news that might make me even consider going back into rental again.
    But no.
    All the kite says to me is that they are intent on drowning landlords in red tape and piling on the sh!t even more. There is in no way any attempt or intention to improve the side of the landlord.
    If you were on the fence about getting out then get out now would be my advice. Its just more and more and more hassle coming your way the longer you wait.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,003 ✭✭✭handlemaster


    The government are just playing populist BS now. The putting tenants personal responsibility on the landlord is just pointless. More and more landlords will leave and more to the point new ones will not be attracted . Why is this important is the government are dependant on the private sector to house social tenants and tenants that work and pay the taxes it takes to run this country.


  • Registered Users Posts: 834 ✭✭✭GGTrek


    So is this notifying of revenue effective immediately or is it just a kite for now?
    It is not now, it is a proposal from the government and it is a notification to RTB, not revenue. To force landlords to perform this they will have to go through the Oireachtas in order to change (again and again) the Residential Tenancies Act. Problem of this process, as I have outlined it in my previous post: you open up again the pandora's box for all the various whackos/socialist/communists/interested parties TDs to put in amendments that will seriously curtail the whole list of termination notices from landlord (mostly Section 34) so the risk for unintended (or maybe fully intended) consequences is substantial. My mistrust for the govvie and the TDs is total.

    What many socialists/communists want is simply a removal of private property rights for non-PPR properties (if they could they would remove it also for PPR, but since the vast majority of Irish people own at least a property they know they would be seriously screwed if they even mentioned such an idea). This is their agenda according to their ideology, this is the paradise they hope for:  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2594170/Venezuelan-president-orders-landlords-sell-homes-60-days-face-fine-24-000-wild-bid-plug-housing-shortage.html


  • Registered Users Posts: 236 ✭✭SmallgirlBigcity


    Is this in effect now or as the last post suggested - just a proposal from the government? Thanks.


  • Registered Users Posts: 834 ✭✭✭GGTrek


    Is this in effect now or as the last post suggested - just a proposal from the government? Thanks.
    At the moment it is just a proposal from the government. But as it happened with the last two Christmas presents of 2015 and 2016, you can be almost sure they will try to get this into law (and maybe add something else as well) before end of 2017 to show the govvie is doing something. Maybe some of the proposal might even go into the budget (even more rushed in such case)


  • Registered Users Posts: 118 ✭✭rossmores


    It is already next to impossible to get rid of recession rentals the long notice offers no encouragement to leave and with dwindling supply seem many LLs are stuck with them...
    If the loony left get there way this xmas it will be the final nail in private LLs cant increase rent to a reasonable rate while all other costs can and are rising.


  • Registered Users Posts: 992 ✭✭✭jamesthepeach


    rossmores wrote: »
    It is already next to impossible to get rid of recession rentals the long notice offers no encouragement to leave and with dwindling supply seem many LLs are stuck with them...
    If the loony left get there way this xmas it will be the final nail in private LLs cant increase rent to a reasonable rate while all other costs can and are rising.

    Seems to be getting worse alright.
    Glad I got out while I could. I worry for those I know who are still in though.
    Before you know it when it becomes unviable it will be impossible to get out at all. You will be forced by govt to swallow losses and not even be able to end the investment.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,795 ✭✭✭mrslancaster


    Seems to be getting worse alright.
    Glad I got out while I could. I worry for those I know who are still in though.
    Before you know it when it becomes unviable it will be impossible to get out at all. You will be forced by govt to swallow losses and not even be able to end the investment.

    Some of the recommendations made by Threshold in their pre-budget submission would make a lot of landlords think about getting out.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,707 ✭✭✭✭Tigger




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,346 ✭✭✭Mrs Shuttleworth


    GGTrek wrote: »
    What many socialists/communists want is simply a removal of private property rights for non-PPR properties (if they could they would remove it also for PPR, but since the vast majority of Irish people own at least a property they know they would be seriously screwed if they even mentioned such an idea). This is their agenda according to their ideology, this is the paradise they hope for:  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2594170/Venezuelan-president-orders-landlords-sell-homes-60-days-face-fine-24-000-wild-bid-plug-housing-shortage.html

    I suspect it's a little bit more than that, and the elements of Bilderberg/EU allied to FG are now showing their metal.

    Google Luigi Fogli.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,382 ✭✭✭JillyQ


    Why in God's name would anyone want to become a landlord, after reading those two links. The government appear to be hell bent on getting private out of the property market.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 314 ✭✭Stephen Hawkins football boots


    Excellent news for vunerable tenants .well done Mr Murphy


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Another joke of a move. Some serious discrimination against LLs going on with all these new measures. Why is no one getting in the media to fight the corner for LLs, making points like the higher deposit is needed to cover potential damage or lost rental on the property worth hundreds of thousands rented to tenants who have far too much rights over the property and thus could costs the LL 10's of thousands.

    That article is full of digs at LLs and then you have threashold in there too, a total rouge entity.


  • Registered Users Posts: 834 ✭✭✭GGTrek


    Excellent news for vunerable tenants .well done Mr Murphy
    Be careful what you wish for. The measure of capping deposits will basically exclude every tenant that does not have a decent salary since landlords in Ireland only have deposit to go to in case of a non-rent paying tenant or a tenant that causes damage or does not pay last month rent (last one is very common). Tenants with good salary are the only ones worth keeping since they have something to loose if they break leases or damage property, attachment of earnings is possible only in these cases.

    Remember that the biggest issue in Ireland is not rent increases or deposit retention (just media spin and Threshold spin), but rent arrears and overholding (look at the 2017 RTB adjudications). The media spin and Threshold spin is screwing the market. Expect number of available properties for rent to fall even further given the utter stupidity of this government. Who is going to supply residential tenancies if the risk as usual is put all on the landlords' shoulders, think about what effect the stupid proposals will have on supply: reduction.

    I cannot even digest the lies of this government like “We are undertaking a review of the Rebuilding Ireland plan and we will look at any option open to Government which are affordable and which will increase the supply of housing,” They are doing the exact opposite with their measures, they are reducing supply in the name of the socialist ideology (or better: be seen in a good light in the mostly socialist media)


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,346 ✭✭✭Mrs Shuttleworth


    Another joke of a move. Some serious discrimination against LLs going on with all these new measure. Why is no one getting in the media to fight the corner for LLs, making points like the higher deposit is needed to cover potential damage or lost rental on the property worth hundreds of thousands rented to tenants who have far too much rights over the property and thus could costs the LL 10's of thousands.

    That article is full of digs at LLs and then you have threashold in there too, a total rouge entity.

    Landlords really should "turn into the slide" with all these new measures and engage in all lawful activity to generate income from the property without letting under the provisions of the Residential Tenancies Act.

    It's been happening organically but a conscious effort to cripple/paralyze the sector might generate enough anger from potential tenants in the medium term to level the playing pitch.


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,381 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    Tigger wrote: »
    Daft, completely daft. Where else would you hand over an asset worth over a million for only 3.5k deposit


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,381 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    Excellent news for vunerable tenants .well done Mr Murphy
    What about vulnerable landlords? I will certainly never again let to someone who may be considered to be vulnerable, only to someone with a solid job


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,255 ✭✭✭sk8board


    as a LL with multiple tenancies, I don't have any issue with this RTB notification as such, as long as it doesn't affect the timeline for removal.
    As long as I'm removing the tenants in good faith, then I'd have no problem notifying the RTB to ensure they get whatever supports they need in the current.

    That said, if this is a tenant issue (breaking the lease for whatever reason), I wouldn't want this notification process slowing things down - which TBH I don't think is the case.

    I'm only looking fwd to the budget to see if they allow LPT against tax, or allow (non-accidental) LL's to professionalise and form companies.


  • Registered Users Posts: 846 ✭✭✭April 73


    This government seem to be intent on legislating against private landlords.
    We are getting close to a situation where you will be forced to rent your property with virtually no rights over who you can rent to, how much you can rent for & how long that tenant can live in your property.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,719 ✭✭✭JaMarcusHustle


    Re: the RTB notice of terminations. Is there any information on timelines? i.e. will landlords have to wait until the tenant receives their information pack before they can issue termination notice or can you just (i) sent notification to RTB by registered post (ii) wait 1 day until post has been signed for, thus RTB have been notified, and (iii) straight away notify your tenant of termination....? If so, then it's not that big of a deal, but just more stupid, pointless hoops landlords have to jump through.

    Part of me thinks there is a concerted effort to make remaining a landlord in this country unprofitable, unfeasible, a massive pain in the arse or all of the above, just so landlords sell up and increase the housing supply.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,075 ✭✭✭DubCount


    I know that there have been many measures that have been called "the last straw", but in a market which is seeing reductions in the number of private landlords we have various laws "protecting vulnerable tenants".

    We have 2 year gaps between rent increases, RPZ's, and now the only issues the government/media want to address is deposit levels, deposit holding schemes, notification of evictions to RTB.....

    Soon we wont have to worry about "protecting vulnerable tenants", there will be no tenants left - vulnerable or otherwise.


Advertisement