Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Baldonnell as a freight hub?

  • 14-10-2020 3:53pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 438 ✭✭


    I am aware that this one has been picked over more than a few times, with Ryanair digging it up every so often to try and hammer the DAA on pricing.

    My question is could Baldonnel end up as a 2nd airport for Dublin, handling freight rather than Pax on a limited basis.. for Amazon

    A few talking points on this:

    1)Amazon have opened their first Irish warehouse in the past few weeks in Greenogue business park, not more than 50m from the boundary of Baldonnel. As we all know, they are expanding their in house logistics offering, including Amazon Air with aircraft chartered from various ACMI providers(including ASL). In a post Brexit world, could the have the volume to fill a daily rotation to mainland Europe using at 737F?
    2) Extra revenue for DOD through landing fees, that could be used to provide 24hr coverage on Fire and ATC


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,538 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    The DOD likely have zero interest in this, which is the important thing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 438 ✭✭andrewfaulk


    L1011 wrote: »
    The DOD likely have zero interest in this, which is the important thing.

    If it meant a few €m a year in landing fees would that still be the case I wonder?

    Maybe a separate(west) Apron for freight ops would smooth things over a little.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,796 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    The investment required from the DOD would be probative. Also the investment needed from a ground handler
    ....For starters

    You’d need a ground handling agent who’d need to invest cash in...

    Staff -

    Ramp agents, loadmasters, operations, flight dispatchers, GSE maintenance, managers etc..

    Ground handling equipment -

    High loaders, low loaders, belt loaders, pushback tugs, ground power units, tow tractors for transfer of freight, dollys. trucks with roller beds.

    All at least x2... that stuff costs BIG time. The air corps won’t be lending their gear or staff to a civilian operator.

    A lot less hassle to say to DHL, UPS and their competition at DUB that they want to pre book, xx number of positions on their aircraft, build freight on pallets / ulds. Might need to bring in a bigger aircraft but the extra volume will pay the extra cost,

    Office space -

    Folks doing flight paperwork, weight and balance, dangerous goods manifest, all that needs to be considered and ALL that paperwork needs filing for xx days... DOD won’t be building office space.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,750 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tabnabs


    Oslo Airport, Gardermoen is a joint civilian and military location and Frankfurt Airport was home to the USAF Rhein-Main Air Base until 2005.

    Where there's a will, there's a way.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,186 ✭✭✭✭jmayo


    Chania in Crete is joint civilian and military.

    US Navy in Souda base uses it.

    Hence why the whole area is pixelated in Google maps.

    I am not allowed discuss …



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 438 ✭✭andrewfaulk


    Strumms wrote: »
    The investment required from the DOD would be probative. Also the investment needed from a ground handler
    ....For starters

    You’d need a ground handling agent who’d need to invest cash in...

    Staff -

    Ramp agents, loadmasters, operations, flight dispatchers, GSE maintenance, managers etc..

    Ground handling equipment -

    High loaders, low loaders, belt loaders, pushback tugs, ground power units, tow tractors for transfer of freight, dollys. trucks with roller beds.

    All at least x2... that stuff costs BIG time. The air corps won’t be lending their gear or staff to a civilian operator.

    A lot less hassle to say to DHL, UPS and their competition at DUB that they want to pre book, xx number of positions on their aircraft, build freight on pallets / ulds. Might need to bring in a bigger aircraft but the extra volume will pay the extra cost,

    Office space -

    Folks doing flight paperwork, weight and balance, dangerous goods manifest, all that needs to be considered and ALL that paperwork needs filing for xx days... DOD won’t be building office space.

    I don't think anyone is suggesting DOD invest in anything, other than maybe some extra staff training and a new fire tender. The private operator would look after all handling ops, on their own apron away from Mil ops..

    And yes the investment would be large up front, but interest rates are in the -%.. Also bear in mind, 6 years ago there was no Amazon air, now it has ~70 aircraft operating for it.. That is some rate of growth by any measure. They are actively building an in house logistics network, and minimising their use of the big consolidators(UPS,DHL, Fedex).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,349 ✭✭✭basill


    Baldonnel is not an all weather airport. Cargo operators want to be able to land all year round and not face the prospect of having to divert to Dublin. The funds needed to upgrade BAL would far outweigh the financial benefits to the State.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 645 ✭✭✭faoiarvok


    Cargo ops are more complicated than flying a few planes in from somewhere and out to somewhere. A huge amount of cargo travels in the hold of passenger flights, and this needs to be integrated with packages going in and out on cargo only flights. This obviously happens at hubs with plenty of passenger ops also.

    I don’t think the convenience of a field right next to your warehouse outweighs the convenience of a large hub just down the road with movements from all over (in normal times...) and presence of all the other logistics companies.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,796 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    Space will be a huge issue airside, you’ll need space for parking of at least two widebody / narrow body jets.

    You’ll need storage for 50 plus or so Ulds / pallets and nets.

    Parking space and maintenance for ALL the extra GSE ... two highloaders, two low loaders ( depending on aircraft types maybe more ) and multiple mulags, dollys, spill kits...

    Looking at the google maps view of baldonnel...I’d say a non starter unless there would be a serious redesign of the ramp, taxiways and added infrastructure.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,404 ✭✭✭dogmatix


    There is also the security aspect. Baldonnel is a military establishment so there would have to be a secure level of separation between the commercial area and the rest of the airbase. A separate entrance would be needed for the cargo area and I would imagine the air corps would have to monitor the commercial area 24/7 to prevent any access to the military area (both unintended and intended).


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,712 ✭✭✭roundymac


    You can be sure if it were to go ahead DOD won't see a penny of it.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 9,927 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    Tabnabs wrote: »
    Oslo Airport, Gardermoen is a joint civilian and military location and Frankfurt Airport was home to the USAF Rhein-Main Air Base until 2005.

    Where there's a will, there's a way.

    Thats true, but it needs "a will" to even contemplate planning such a project.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,984 ✭✭✭Stovepipe


    It's far too small. Strumms is exactly right. When you see how much of Dublin Airport is consumed by cargo facilities/storage/parking, even before you consider the size of ramp space freighters need,then Baldonnel is too small, it's taxiways and probably the short runway inadequate for anything bigger than an ATR. A loaded 737 cargo aircraft would have trouble getting in and out of there and the late night noise effect on local housing would be immense. At best, limited ATR or equivalent turbo prop operations.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 716 ✭✭✭POBox19


    A huge investment would be required to upgrade Casement Aerodrome so it could handle commercial aircraft operations. It would be a lot less costly to move Amazon's warehouse closer to Dublin Airport.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Not to mention SNN two hours drive down the road with the only runway long enough for the biggest cargo planes...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 893 ✭✭✭HTCOne


    BAL is a tiny airfield with small taxiways and runways unsuitable for fully loaded cargo jets, and I can only imagine the wind shear that close to the mountains in a southerly gale. As said earlier, MO’L talking it up occasionally as an alternative to DUB is just publicity and to try to exert pressure on the DAA. It was like years ago during an industrial dispute when he called for Air Corps controllers to take over ops for DUB, conveniently forgetting to mention there were only about 4 of them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,074 ✭✭✭xper


    If you want another nail in the coffin, also consider that freight is, in normal times, concentrated in night time ops and the approach to rwy 28 which would be the most commonly used, is over a large swathe of the city suburbs.

    If Baldonnel was ever going to develop into a joint commercial/military airport, it would have required building the civil apron and terminal facilities on the opposite side from the military base but the industrial estate is there now. The only thing I could possibly see as feasible in the future is a small operation to facilitate private jet traffic and other specialist GA operators. That could possibly be a little earner for the DoD that wouldn’t interfere with military ops and might be desirable if Weston finally turns into houses. This wouldn’t likely extend to accommodating flight schools and other light aircraft tootling around the pattern all day, though


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,984 ✭✭✭Stovepipe


    I agree. I suspect Weston will be housing in a year or two, if it even lasts that long as an airfield. It would be relatively simple to install an FBO like Signature into Baldonnel with it's own terminal and ramp space. Every municipal airport in America does it, as second nature, on airfileds often smaller than Baldonnel. You offer them cheaper parking and handling than Dublin Airport and they'd be there like a shot and the DAA would be glad to be rid of them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,796 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    Not to mention SNN two hours drive down the road with the only runway long enough for the biggest cargo planes...

    Two hours is an awful long time in terms of express cargo whose delivery commitments at the destination are enshrined in contracts whereby failure if not covered by the Warsaw Convention means shipping is free unless tech / weather intervenes which IS covered.

    No cargo of an express nature is going to be going Leinster - SNN.

    Cargo arrives at SNN, you may have the need to X-Ray it, ETD it, containerize it in ULDs / on pallets. Two and a bit hours driving to SNN, offloading, transit through handling agent. Freight getting airside, loaded, checked. Minimum four hours to the truck leaving Dublin and the first ULD on the aircraft in SNN. That’s a generous guesstimate but from experience.

    IF DG it needs checks, loading, tie down, possible halon bottles hooked up, manifest entry, completion, crew checks...

    The cost too of daily 40ft trucks shunting tones of freight DUB - SNN would be humongous, thousands a week. When you’ve got DUB at a fraction of the cost, better cargo handling facilities. Yearly savings would be huge.

    Runway in DUB isn’t an issue. I’ve been loadmaster on aircraft landing with 41/42 tonnes, departing with 30+. BAL might need some work I don’t know, cheaper than not doing it.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 146 ✭✭salamiii


    airports need large runways for large cargo planes


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,490 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    It's all about hubs. Baldonnel isn't and likely can't become a hub. Dublin Airport is a hub and will likely expand. Using a forklift to take a container off one plane and putting it on another is a lot simpler and cheaper than adding a truck an a second forklift into the mix.
    Stovepipe wrote: »
    I agree. I suspect Weston will be housing in a year or two, if it even lasts that long as an airfield. It would be relatively simple to install an FBO like Signature into Baldonnel with it's own terminal and ramp space. Every municipal airport in America does it, as second nature, on airfileds often smaller than Baldonnel. You offer them cheaper parking and handling than Dublin Airport and they'd be there like a shot and the DAA would be glad to be rid of them.
    I'm not so sure that DAA will be turning its nose up at any business in the short term. In the medium term, the second runway means that light(er) aircraft aren't a burden on slots.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Strumms wrote: »
    Two hours is an awful long time in terms of express cargo whose delivery commitments at the destination are enshrined in contracts whereby ...

    Hang on, I’m not on about shutting DUB, I’m just saying there’s a second airport that would take up a prospective BAL’s freight business that is already operating without the capital cost of all the work that’d need doing in BAL.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,427 ✭✭✭✭Marcusm


    I am aware that this one has been picked over more than a few times, with Ryanair digging it up every so often to try and hammer the DAA on pricing.

    My question is could Baldonnel end up as a 2nd airport for Dublin, handling freight rather than Pax on a limited basis.. for Amazon

    A few talking points on this:

    1)Amazon have opened their first Irish warehouse in the past few weeks in Greenogue business park, not more than 50m from the boundary of Baldonnel. As we all know, they are expanding their in house logistics offering, including Amazon Air with aircraft chartered from various ACMI providers(including ASL). In a post Brexit world, could the have the volume to fill a daily rotation to mainland Europe using at 737F?
    2) Extra revenue for DOD through landing fees, that could be used to provide 24hr coverage on Fire and ATC

    Unless Amazon changes its business model, I would expect that the Dublin warehouse will store the most commonly sold goods which will likely be delivered to the warehouse/fulfilment centre by land transport (trucks). We’ll still see a lot of Amazon packages delivered via air but those will have been handed off to the delivery system at the originating warehouse rather than be delivered from an air service provider to an Amazon warehouse and then onwards to a ground service provider.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,496 ✭✭✭donkey balls


    As mentioned above trucking a large amount of freight is costly,, Take a aircraft like an MD11 F as an example.
    The main deck can hold over 26 full size pallets/ULD you can fit 4 onto a 45ft trailer, The belly can take a mix of about 5 main deck pallets and about 12 AKE.
    You can fit 8 AKE/LD3 on a 45ft trailer that's a lot of trucks needed for just one aircraft.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,357 ✭✭✭Negative_G


    There are so many reasons why this will never be a runner in any format that I won't waste any time listing them. Most have been mentioned already.

    The only prospect of civilian ops at Baldonnel would be in the form of bizjet traffic.

    Northolt are in a similar, yet not quite full comparable situation. They offer a certain amount of slots every day to civil traffic between set hours. They maintain the authority to shut the airfield down to civil ops without any notification whatsoever. Hours of operation are strict so not always conducive to business travel.

    Northolt, unlike Casement is a purely operational airfield. There is almost little to no training on site, and certainly no ab-initio flight training.

    Given the limited approach procedures, limited ATC, limited (current) ground services, limited runway length, limited opening hours, and little to know difference in time to time to the city, its not going to be a runner.

    If you have enough money to fund a business jet, you'll dance to your own tune, not to someone else's, even if it costs a couple of grand more to have full flexibility, which is the whole point of a business jet in the first place.

    Casement Cargo Ops - zero probability
    Casement Bizjet Ops - almost zero probability

    Put it this way, if you are a big shot (google, FB, LinkedIn) executive traveling to visit your Dublin operation (not sure if the top mgmt travel by bicycle but let's assume they do).

    Would you rather operate into an airfield with existing FBO's, long runways, 24hr ops, multiple ILS/RNAV/VOR approaches.

    Or operate into an airfield with the longest runway being 6000ft, (the other about 5000ft), limited hours of operation, only one precision approach to a runway which is the opposite side of the prevailing wind the majority of the time.

    Maybe the latter might, depending on the set up, offer a fractionally more flexibility due to it being less busy.

    I imagine it'll be a hard pill to swallow when a bizjet misses a slot because there was a Cadet doing local VFR circuits at the same time.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,984 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Plus I don't think it is really a warehouse in the traditional sense that Amazon have set up there, it is what they call a "delivery station".

    I don't think they keep any stock there, they still have the stock in their UK warehouses, it gets loaded onto trucks in the UK and then shipped to this "delivery station" every day, where it gets broken down and shipped out by their delivery partners.

    Amazon don't offer any next day delivery in Ireland, it is max 2 day delivery, so the above setup works well for them, with no need for expensive airfreight.

    Of course this might change with Brexit or if they decide to offer next day/same day delivery.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,006 ✭✭✭EICVD


    salamiii wrote: »
    airports need large runways for large cargo planes

    Haha we’re not talking about fully laden Antonovs here


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 893 ✭✭✭HTCOne


    No, but anything larger than an ATP or ATR is going to struggle.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,847 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    bk wrote: »
    Plus I don't think it is really a warehouse in the traditional sense that Amazon have set up there, it is what they call a "delivery station".

    I don't think they keep any stock there, they still have the stock in their UK warehouses, it gets loaded onto trucks in the UK and then shipped to this "delivery station" every day, where it gets broken down and shipped out by their delivery partners.

    Amazon don't offer any next day delivery in Ireland, it is max 2 day delivery, so the above setup works well for them, with no need for expensive airfreight.

    Of course this might change with Brexit or if they decide to offer next day/same day delivery.

    Have amazon not bought a large tract of land near Dublin Airport for warehouses,?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,496 ✭✭✭donkey balls


    roadmaster wrote: »
    Have amazon not bought a large tract of land near Dublin Airport for warehouses,?

    They are building a Data center in Blanchardstown at first people thought it was going be a warehouse.
    .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,349 ✭✭✭basill


    With todays news of the planned fulfillment centre going in beside Baldonnel perhaps this thread isn't so far fetched afterall. US inward investment upgrading a military airport to modern all weather standards for mixed use would certainly present a good news story for local TDs and government to hang their hats on. Small change for Amazon. Time will tell.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,847 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    basill wrote: »
    With todays news of the planned fulfillment centre going in beside Baldonnel perhaps this thread isn't so far fetched afterall. US inward investment upgrading a military airport to modern all weather standards for mixed use would certainly present a good news story for local TDs and government to hang their hats on. Small change for Amazon. Time will tell.

    I dont think it will be case of upgrading more a case of bye bye casement aerodrome hello Amazon Aerodrome in the long term . Like you say it would be small change for amazon an easy for them to buy out casement from the government. i know people have mentioned runway length but even at that they could use ATRs like that cargo one that fly's Shannon to Paris every night. An amazon have already started to buy aircraft

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-01-05/amazon-makes-first-aircraft-purchase-to-expand-delivery-network


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,236 ✭✭✭deandean


    I reckon the 2nd runway at DUB will cater for all these cargo needs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,357 ✭✭✭Negative_G


    deandean wrote: »
    I reckon the 2nd runway at DUB will cater for all these cargo needs.

    Don't let common sense get in the way.

    Amazon Aerodrome all the way.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,847 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Negative_G wrote: »
    Don't let common sense get in the way.

    Amazon Aerodrome all the way.

    The government would not think twice of selling Casement if it came down to it. 100s of extra jobs and corporate tax is all that matters


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 506 ✭✭✭Teebor15


    Sell Casement and move the Aer Corps to Shannon. Keep a small base at DUB for the Garda Heli and Gov Learjet, maybe next to the CHC base.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 172 ✭✭jeepcj


    Teebor15 wrote: »
    Sell Casement and move the Aer Corps to Shannon. Keep a small base at DUB for the Garda Heli and Gov Learjet, maybe next to the CHC base.

    Operating a police heli out of a international airport would never work, too many restrictons


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 506 ✭✭✭Teebor15


    Of course it would work, R116, the CHC rescue helicopter operates just fine.


  • Registered Users Posts: 112 ✭✭a/tel


    Teebor15 wrote: »
    Of course it would work, R116, the CHC rescue helicopter operates just fine.

    The security provided by Casement cannot be replicated in DUB unless a secure compound, hanger and associated maintenance facility is built. Basing AC pilots outside a military establishment could be a logistical issue also.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 6,522 Mod ✭✭✭✭Irish Steve


    Teebor15 wrote: »
    Of course it would work, R116, the CHC rescue helicopter operates just fine.

    It works well at the moment because the majority of the time the active runway is 28, so the separation from the CHC base is sufficient to allow almost parallel operation, but when the new runway comes into use, that will make things a bit more complex, as the CHC base won't have adequate separation from 28R in the same way, so the coordination of operations will be more complex, albeit still achievable. The same would be true for police operations.

    Shore, if it was easy, everybody would be doin it.😁



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,490 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    It works well at the moment because the majority of the time the active runway is 28, so the separation from the CHC base is sufficient to allow almost parallel operation, but when the new runway comes into use, that will make things a bit more complex, as the CHC base won't have adequate separation from 28R in the same way, so the coordination of operations will be more complex, albeit still achievable. The same would be true for police operations.
    With two runways in operation, frequency of use of an individual runway will drop.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 6,522 Mod ✭✭✭✭Irish Steve


    Victor wrote: »
    With two runways in operation, frequency of use of an individual runway will drop.

    True, but bear in mind that anything below 1000 Ft and within 5 miles will potentially inhibit activity from the SAR base, which is not the case with the operations on 28(L) at present, due to the horizontal separation distance that exists. Occasional issues can arise now if 16/34 is active, but that's relatively rare. 28R/10L becoming active will change how CHC can get in and out, their operation won't be prevented, but could be delayed on occasions, and if for some reason 28L/10R were to be out of service, then the activity on the northern runway would have an effect on the CHC base operations.

    Shore, if it was easy, everybody would be doin it.😁



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,847 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    True, but bear in mind that anything below 1000 Ft and within 5 miles will potentially inhibit activity from the SAR base, which is not the case with the operations on 28(L) at present, due to the horizontal separation distance that exists. Occasional issues can arise now if 16/34 is active, but that's relatively rare. 28R/10L becoming active will change how CHC can get in and out, their operation won't be prevented, but could be delayed on occasions, and if for some reason 28L/10R were to be out of service, then the activity on the northern runway would have an effect on the CHC base operations.

    If there is going to be potential issues why did they let them build a new base where it is


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,490 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    True, but bear in mind that anything below 1000 Ft and within 5 miles will potentially inhibit activity from the SAR base, which is not the case with the operations on 28(L) at present, due to the horizontal separation distance that exists. Occasional issues can arise now if 16/34 is active, but that's relatively rare. 28R/10L becoming active will change how CHC can get in and out, their operation won't be prevented, but could be delayed on occasions, and if for some reason 28L/10R were to be out of service, then the activity on the northern runway would have an effect on the CHC base operations.
    Surely there is a few minutes between CHC receiving the call and take-off and that a slot can be opened up?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 893 ✭✭✭HTCOne


    Shannon in talks with Amazon about a possible distribution facility, which makes more sense than Casement to put it mildly....

    https://www.independent.ie/business/irish/amazon-in-talks-over-key-facility-at-shannon-airport-40033977.html


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,918 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    I hate to burst a few bubbles here.

    The elephant in the room here is the flightpath of the runway and the housing underneath and around it.

    I find it extraordinary that over the three and bit pages here, some of the proponents of the notion don't even seem to realise that.

    I really cannot see the local communities across south Dublin accepting the idea of Baldonnel's conversion to a cargo airport with a consequent uplift in activity and aircraft size and noise .

    The approach to the main runway is across Tallaght, Templeogue, Knocklyon, Rathfarnham, Ballinteer and Dundrum.

    At present there are limited flight operations at the airfield, that cause minimal noise disruption to those residents.

    The idea that people are going to suddenly accept much greater activity and noise, and at night, is to me farcical.

    I cannot see that ever being acceptable to the residents, and politically it could be suicidal for a party that pushed for it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,847 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    LXFlyer wrote: »
    I hate to burst a few bubbles here.

    The elephant in the room here is the flightpath of the runway and the housing underneath and around it.

    I find it extraordinary that over the three and bit pages here, some of the proponents of the notion don't even seem to realise that.

    I really cannot see the local communities across south Dublin accepting the idea of Baldonnel's conversion to a cargo airport with a consequent uplift in activity and aircraft size and noise .

    The approach to the main runway is across Tallaght, Templeogue, Knocklyon, Rathfarnham, Ballinteer and Dundrum.

    At present there are limited flight operations at the airfield, that cause minimal noise disruption to those residents.

    The idea that people are going to suddenly accept much greater activity and noise, and at night, is to me farcical.

    I cannot see that ever being acceptable to the residents, and politically it could be suicidal for a party that pushed for it.

    What are the locals going to do with the noise from the A400Ms, F18's and AW101s that the department of defence are buying for the air corps

    On a serious note if the government decided to act like a proper grown up country and actually bought the air corps heavy lift transport aircraft or even some sort of interceptor they would make a lot more noise so would there be trouble down the road with residents?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,918 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    roadmaster wrote: »
    What are the locals going to do with the noise from the A400Ms, F18's and AW101s that the department of defence are buying for the air corps

    On a serious note if the government decided to act like a proper grown up country and actually bought the air corps heavy lift transport aircraft or even some sort of interceptor they would make a lot more noise so would there be trouble down the road with residents?

    There’s a huge difference between Baldonnel being operated as an Air Corps base with relatively infrequent flight operations (even with noisier aircraft), and turning the airport into a cargo base which would have much greater numbers of daily flight ops and at night over heavily populated areas.

    I could never see the latter taking off for that reason.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,963 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    roadmaster wrote: »
    What are the locals going to do with the noise from the A400Ms, F18's and AW101s that the department of defence are buying for the air corps

    On a serious note if the government decided to act like a proper grown up country and actually bought the air corps heavy lift transport aircraft or even some sort of interceptor they would make a lot more noise so would there be trouble down the road with residents?


    I, for one, would completely support the odd F18 doing touch-and-gos at Baldonnel. I would actively encourage it, actually.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 645 ✭✭✭faoiarvok


    roadmaster wrote: »
    What are the locals going to do with the noise from the A400Ms, F18's and AW101s that the department of defence are buying for the air corps

    It’s the understated, off-hand tone that raises this to really top quality trolling.

    *chef’s kiss* Bravo


  • Advertisement
Advertisement