Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

UFC Fight Night Events Thread - Spoilers Within

1679111233

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,386 ✭✭✭Wrongway1985


    Woodley did well to hang in after the difficult first but since all he's done is hang on as the rounds slip away.

    Doubtful now he'll come out particularly after nearly getting dropped there but he obviously needs to.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,649 ✭✭✭Whelo79


    What happened Woodley? From the guy who ran through Robbie Lawlor to the one we have seen over the last 3-4 fights, it's a completely different fighter.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,762 ✭✭✭bmcc10


    50-44 Woodley should call it a day lost 10 rounds in a row now it's a mental thing with him.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,949 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    I hope Tyron retires now.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,588 ✭✭✭derfderf


    38 years old in a kind of young man's division. As mentioned above, lost 10 rounds in a row. I doubt the hunger is there, he looks a shell of himself.
    He never struck me as someone that particularly liked fighting, so it might be time to bow out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,493 ✭✭✭✭martyos121


    derfderf wrote: »
    38 years old in a kind of young man's division. As mentioned above, lost 10 rounds in a row. I doubt the hunger is there, he looks a shell of himself.
    He never struck me as someone that particularly liked fighting, so it might be time to bow out.

    Sounds like he should hang up the gloves alright based on this:

    https://twitter.com/arielhelwani/status/1266954967455346688?s=21

    His heart just isn’t in the sport anymore it seems. He’ll still go down as one of the greatest welterweights of all time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,930 ✭✭✭✭mailburner


    would love to know how woodley would have got on if burns, colby and usman were in the div when he started his reign.
    I think all 3 would have taken him quite handy tbh

    so he beat robbie then wonderboy twice maia and till
    I just think he around at the right time against fighters that suited
    his style but like so many you can only beat what's there at the time.

    maia always struggles against the like woodley, burns colby
    robbie has barely won a fight since
    wonderboy...well at least we won't get to see that one again but razor thin decisions
    Till wasn't ready and had no ground game anyway

    before all that he was outclassed by rory and somehow managed to lose to jake shiels (watch that one:confused:)
    The win against Gastelum and condit were good

    That might sound disrestpectful and I'm sure comparisons can be made with other past champions but woodley right now at his best would be behind those three I mentioned
    I guess he can take some solace in not having had a loss against colby


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,891 ✭✭✭SlowBlowin


    mailburner wrote: »
    would love to know how woodley would have got on if burns, colby and usman were in the div when he started his reign.
    I think all 3 would have taken him quite handy tbh

    so he beat robbie then wonderboy twice maia and till
    I just think he around at the right time against fighters that suited
    his style but like so many you can only beat what's there at the time.

    maia always struggles against the like woodley, burns colby
    robbie has barely won a fight since
    wonderboy...well at least we won't get to see that one again but razor thin decisions
    Till wasn't ready and had no ground game anyway

    before all that he was outclassed by rory and somehow managed to lose to jake shiels (watch that one:confused:)
    The win against Gastelum and condit were good

    That might sound disrestpectful and I'm sure comparisons can be made with other past champions but woodley right now at his best would be behind those three I mentioned
    I guess he can take some solace in not having had a loss against colby

    Couldn't agree more...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,949 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Well I'll disagree, he was a class act and is one of the best welterweightsvof all time. He best all the best and now because he loses two fights poorly in his late thirties everybody suddenly has this weird hindsight?
    The guy is clearly finished but he went the distance despite taking lots of damage.
    I don't think any of them outside of Usman would have been a threat to him in his prime.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 18,217 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatFromHue


    It was a majority draw in the first Wonderboy fight and in his win over Condit Condit picked up a freak knee injury. Whether Woodley was the cause I don't really know.

    His record is good but one of the best ever I don't know about that. Him even getting the title shot in the first place was based on very weak reasons. A split decision over Gasteleum and then 18 months later beats Lawlor.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,930 ✭✭✭✭mailburner


    eagle eye wrote: »
    Well I'll disagree, he was a class act and is one of the best welterweightsvof all time. He best all the best and now because he loses two fights poorly in his late thirties everybody suddenly has this weird hindsight?
    The guy is clearly finished but he went the distance despite taking lots of damage.
    I don't think any of them outside of Usman would have been a threat to him in his prime.

    not sure that really matters, there's better fighters out there now and I'm not sure if he declined that much in the space of 6 months between till and usman or from maia to usman even
    It's not an age thing for me anyway, just better competition.

    colby imo would have taken his soul the same way usman did but at least for now it means colby won't be wearing that strap


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,949 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    mailburner wrote:
    not sure that really matters, there's better fighters out there now and I'm not sure if he declined that much in the space of 6 months between till and usman or from maia to usman even It's not an age thing for me anyway, just better competition.

    colby imo would have taken his soul the same way usman did but at least for now it means colby won't be wearing that strap
    How many Champions can you name in their late thirties? You'll find its a short list. Age does matter
    Colby was ripped apart by Usman, you've nothing only your own opinion on what way a fight between have m and Woodley would go. A prime Woodley Vs Usman would be a great fight, a prime Woodley would ko Covington imo.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,930 ✭✭✭✭mailburner


    eagle eye wrote: »
    How many Champions can you name in their late thirties? You'll find its a short list. Age does matter
    Colby was ripped apart by Usman, you've nothing only your own opinion on what way a fight between have m and Woodley would go. A prime Woodley Vs Usman would be a great fight, a prime Woodley would ko Covington imo.


    He was 36 when usman beat him, not that old, there's been a few...silva 38, randy, chuck bisping all older


    That fight was even going into the last, one judge even had colby 3-1 up so it was actually a close fight, wouldn't call that being ripped apart

    we'll agree to disagree on the woodley colby match up ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,949 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    mailburner wrote:
    He was 36 when usman beat him, not that old, there's been a few...silva 38, randy, chuck bisping all older
    So you admit it's uncommon which means age is a major factor.
    mailburner wrote:
    That fight was even going into the last, one judge even had colby 3-1 up so it was actually a close fight, wouldn't call that being ripped apart
    I don't know what those judges were on, Usman clearly won every round.
    mailburner wrote:
    we'll agree to disagree on the woodley colby match up
    That's fine so long as you realise your opinion is just that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,930 ✭✭✭✭mailburner


    eagle eye wrote: »

    I don't know what those judges were on, Usman clearly won every round.


    .

    plenty would disagree including experts who know a lot more about the game than I do at least

    I think colby won at least a round, maybe 2...again just my opinion if I'm allowed one


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,949 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    mailburner wrote:
    you really do love tyron, apologies if my opinion of him offended you which it looks like it did He's still in the top 10 ww of all time (in my opinon of course)
    I don't love Tyron, I just hate poor revisionism.
    You have decided after he loses a fight at 38 years of age to question his whole legacy. Not only that but you are also dismissing Robbie Lawler and Damien Maia.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,930 ✭✭✭✭mailburner


    eagle eye wrote: »
    I don't love Tyron, I just hate poor revisionism.
    You have decided after he loses a fight at 38 years of age to question his whole legacy. Not only that but you are also dismissing Robbie Lawler and Damien Maia.

    sure maia is an old man and robbie has won 1 fight in 4 years

    nope, I'm only saying that colby or usman (and burns possibly) would have
    beaten tyron in his prime

    It's only my opinion of course

    woodley wasn't bad though :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,949 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    mailburner wrote:
    sure maia is an old man and robbie has won 1 fight in 4 years

    nope, I'm only saying that colby or usman (and burns possibly) would have beaten tyron in his prime

    It's only my opinion of course

    woodley wasn't bad though

    You dissed his wins over Lawler and Maia. Then you go on about Covington, whose biggest wins were over an older Lawler and older Maia over the distance, as better than Woodley who beat both of them when they were younger better fighters and ko'd Lawler.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,891 ✭✭✭SlowBlowin


    eagle eye wrote: »
    Well I'll disagree, he was a class act and is one of the best welterweightsvof all time. He best all the best and now because he loses two fights poorly in his late thirties everybody suddenly has this weird hindsight?
    The guy is clearly finished but he went the distance despite taking lots of damage.
    I don't think any of them outside of Usman would have been a threat to him in his prime.

    Its just my opinion, I think he was good, as for being the best of all time, we would disagree on that point.

    When he was training Floyd and they made a point about telling the world he (Tyrone) was the best of all time I gave it some serious thought and decided in my view no, that was not the case.

    He was a great fighter when he could dictate the pace, but his hunger for a win seemed to ebb away when faced with serious opposition.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,949 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    SlowBlowin wrote:
    He was a great fighter when he could dictate the pace, but his hunger for a win seemed to ebb away when faced with serious opposition.
    What fights are you alluding to where his hunger ebbed away?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,930 ✭✭✭✭mailburner


    eagle eye wrote: »
    You dissed his wins over Lawler and Maia. Then you go on about Covington, whose biggest wins were over an older Lawler and older Maia over the distance, as better than Woodley who beat both of them when they were younger better fighters and ko'd Lawler.

    you're right about colby in that he's not really beaten much and he had a nice soft run up to the title fight against a past it robbie, maia and rda

    wood lost to rory and beat kim and gastelum and got a shot, possibly jumping the queue there
    He's still achieved a lot more than cc or usman and in such a stacked div I think anyone of cc, usman burns might beat each other on any given night.





    His performance against usman surprised me a little as I thought usman would beat him handy so maybe I'm giving colby too much credit for performance against usman


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,891 ✭✭✭SlowBlowin


    eagle eye wrote: »
    What fights are you alluding to where his hunger ebbed away?

    In my opinion he has not displayed any hunger since the Lawler fight. Till was a forgone conclusion so I ignore that. Other than Till he only ever did just enough to get a close decision, or indeed lost.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,949 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    SlowBlowin wrote: »
    In my opinion he has not displayed any hunger since the Lawler fight. Till was a forgone conclusion so I ignore that. Other than Till he only ever did just enough to get a close decision, or indeed lost.
    So basically we are back to his last two fights again.

    Everything you are basing his whole career on is in his last two fights. Do you not see how ridiculous that is?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,891 ✭✭✭SlowBlowin


    eagle eye wrote: »
    So basically we are back to his last two fights again.

    Everything you are basing his whole career on is in his last two fights. Do you not see how ridiculous that is?

    No, count again, thats 6 fights which is 25% of his professional fights, so not at all ridiculous.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,949 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    SlowBlowin wrote:
    No, count again, thats 6 fights which is 25% of his professional fights, so not at all ridiculous.

    Name the fights.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,891 ✭✭✭SlowBlowin


    Why don't you do it, look at his record online, google Tyron Woodley and count from burns backwards to Lawler. You will have to use both hands because its 6 (unless by some chance you have 6 fingers on one hand)..

    Its just my opinion, there is no right and wrong, its an opinion, I have gardening to do now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,949 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    SlowBlowin wrote:
    Why don't you do it, look at his record online, google Tyron Woodley and count from burns backwards to Lawler. You will have to use both hands because its 6 (unless by some chance you have 6 fingers on one hand)..
    He won all those fights up until Usman. I've seen most of his fights. I've no idea what you are on about. You are saying he had no hunger, he beat Lawler, beat Maia, beat Till, drew and beat Wonderboy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,891 ✭✭✭SlowBlowin


    Yes I know the results, I am saying he never looked like the GOAT.

    The GOAT would have put away Thompson, look how Burns handled Demian Maia, Woodley did a great job but didn't seem hungry/able to finish.

    As I said, hes been a great fighter and champion, just not the GOAT in my opinion.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,949 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    I never called him the GOAT, I called him one of the best welterweights of all time. GSP is the greatest welterweight ever.

    Now you are comparing 39 year old Maia with 42 year old Maia. How about Usman vs Maia the year after he fought Woodley? Better comparison maybe?
    Thompson had been put away once in his life, early in his career, when he met Woodley. Burns fought a 37 year old Thompson, again three years older than when he fought Woodley

    He's certainly in the conversation for welterweight's greatest.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,930 ✭✭✭✭mailburner


    eagle eye wrote: »
    I

    Thompson had been put away once in his life, early in his career, when he met Woodley. Burns fought a 37 year old Thompson, again three years older than when he fought Woodley

    :confused::confused::confused:

    Thomson was put away once....by pettis last year unless you mean losing to matt brown on pts

    burns never fought thompson


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,949 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    mailburner wrote:
    Thomson was put away once....by pettis last year unless you mean losing to matt brown on pts

    burns never fought thompson
    I wrote that wrong. Maia is who I was referring to as being 39 when he fought Woodley, 40 when he fought Usman and 42 when he fought Burns.

    Thompson was never stopped before he met Woodley but you are criticising him for not knocking out Wonderboy?

    Seems you privately dislike Woodley for some reason because he is one of the greatest welterweight's of all time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,930 ✭✭✭✭mailburner


    eagle eye wrote: »
    I wrote that wrong. Maia is who I was referring to as being 39 when he fought Woodley, 40 when he fought Usman and 42 when he fought Burns.

    Thompson was never stopped before he met Woodley but you are criticising him for not knocking out Wonderboy?

    :confused::confused: you're making this up, never said it :confused:
    There's few harder to knock out than wonderboy, pettis got lucky in doing so.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,949 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    SlowBlowin wrote:
    The GOAT would have put away Thompson, look how Burns handled Demian Maia, Woodley did a great job but didn't seem hungry/able to finish.

    mailburner wrote:
    you're making this up, never said it There's few harder to knock out than wonderboy, pettis got lucky in doing so.

    There you go.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,930 ✭✭✭✭mailburner


    eagle eye wrote: »
    There you go.

    you're getting me mixed up with somene else :pac::D

    it's ok you made a simple mistake....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,949 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    mailburner wrote:
    you're getting me mixed up with somene else

    it's ok you made a simple mistake....
    My apologies.
    :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,436 ✭✭✭Homelander


    Shevchenko got annihilated in there in embarrassing fashion....I really don't get why she was a heavy favorite to begin with?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,603 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    Homelander wrote: »
    Shevchenko got annihilated in there in embarrassing fashion....I really don't get why she was a heavy favorite to begin with?

    Possibly confusion Shevchenko that smashed Chookagian in her previous fight.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,649 ✭✭✭Whelo79


    The fighters are in a hurry tonight for some reason. 3 fights so far and all done inside the first minute!


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,588 ✭✭✭derfderf


    Whelo79 wrote: »
    The fighters are in a hurry tonight for some reason. 3 fights so far and all done inside the first minute!

    I tuned in late and there were no fights on for ages. Realised they had about 40 minutes to kill.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,257 ✭✭✭✭MrStuffins


    That Kazakh lady is amped up and very scary. Great performance!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,649 ✭✭✭Whelo79


    MrStuffins wrote: »
    That Kazakh lady is amped up and very scary. Great performance!

    Yeah she was impressive alright. She's so long too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 988 ✭✭✭brendanwalsh


    Incredible card so far. These hungry dogs are desperate to make a name for themselves.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,438 ✭✭✭Still Ill


    Gotta love these names 'Air' Jordain and 'Touchy' Fili :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,649 ✭✭✭Whelo79


    Incredible card so far. These hungry dogs are desperate to make a name for themselves.

    Small cage action. Burn the big cage down!


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,438 ✭✭✭Still Ill


    That's some aggressive coaching from Eye's corner.:eek:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,841 ✭✭✭✭callaway92


    What a disgusting 'Main Event'.

    Fili vs Jourdain was a great fight though


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,397 ✭✭✭xtal191


    Delighted Eye lost, shes very unlikable


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,739 ✭✭✭ASOT


    That card was great, it's always the bad cards on paper that do end up being really good.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,649 ✭✭✭Whelo79


    Not a bad card tonight to be fair. Much better than it came across on paper. Some decent scraps so far, and the much earlier start really helps.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,891 ✭✭✭SlowBlowin


    Whelo79 wrote: »
    Not a bad card tonight to be fair. Much better than it came across on paper. Some decent scraps so far, and the much earlier start really helps.

    My thoughts exactly, really enjoying it so far..


Advertisement