Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

N8/N25/N40 - Dunkettle Interchange [open to traffic]

1235787

Comments

  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,145 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    Shame that the provision for cyclists is gone, it would be great to have a cycle lane from the city to midelton. Im sure there a good few in little island and carrigtwohill working there that would enjoy the challenge of a cycle.
    They would be better off using the local road network. I presume this'll be possible, but it's a bit hard to see on the renders.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,963 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    you got me thinking of just how much has already been achieved....

    At the moment from the end of the Ballincollig By-Pass to north of Ballymena half ways to Coleraine theres a continuous stretch of 492km of motorway and Dual Carraigeway with only Dunkettle and Newlands cross being potential sources of delays!
    http://goo.gl/maps/AOcs3

    Afraid not :D Hillsborough Roundabout and the disgraceful mess that is Sprucefield knock that one!

    Ballincollig bypass to Hillsborough will be DC/motorway once Newlands and Dunkettle are both done.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,516 ✭✭✭Outkast_IRE


    spacetweek wrote: »
    They would be better off using the local road network. I presume this'll be possible, but it's a bit hard to see on the renders.
    There is a small private road between the glanmire roundabout and the dunkettle, heading in the little island direction, it can bring you under the motorway, and onwards towards little island etc, they should look at developing that properly perhaps.

    http://maps.google.ie/maps?hl=en&ll=51.907558,-8.391044&spn=0.005408,0.011619&t=h&z=17


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,907 ✭✭✭munchkin_utd


    MYOB wrote: »
    And at least 4 roundabouts in the north
    I didnt say free flow, just dual carraigeway.
    Roundabouts and even the odd traffic light is grand so long as it doesnt cause bad delays as the main thing is that your journey isnt made hell by yaris or underpowered (cheap to tax) pre 2008 saloons like say going from Cork to Sligo, as on a dual carraigeway you can overtake them.
    Well, the ones that arent sitting in the overtaking lane the whole time anyhow.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,551 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Sprucefield, the lights at yorkgate and the roundabout before Ballymena can all causes serious delays, as can poor merging on the A12 westlink


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,561 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    Any ideas on when this scheme may commence or how long the build might take ?

    Wonder will they redesignate the Glanmire bypass as the M40 ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 997 ✭✭✭Colm R


    Any ideas on when this scheme may commence or how long the build might take ?

    Wonder will they redesignate the Glanmire bypass as the M40 ?

    The Glanmire bypass as the M40 would make sense if it eventually becomes part of the Northern Ring Road. But going west from north of Glanmire to the N20 Limerick road somewhere near Blarney is a hilly and tricky build, and from there to the N22 is a lot more difficult probably involving a tunnel, so I wouldn't bet on it for a long time. Until then its probably best to leave it as the M8.

    As for construction starting, I suspect there is too much building as it is on the N40, so finances aside, after the Bandon and Sarsfield road roundabout are completed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 247 ✭✭bg07


    Colm R wrote: »
    As for construction starting, I suspect there is too much building as it is on the N40, so finances aside, after the Bandon and Sarsfield road roundabout are completed.

    The Bandon and Sarsfield Road roundabouts will be completed in the next few months. Even if they decided to give the go ahead to build this today with the required tendering and detailed design process they'd be doing well to get started by Christmas. I'd be impressed given the current finances if there were diggers on the ground here by the end of 2014.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,963 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    The current list is basically as follows, that we know of, for the PPP process.

    N11/Newlands
    M17/18 Gort to Tuam
    N25 New Ross
    N11 Enniscorthy.
    N6 Galway bypass (whenever it clears the courts).

    They are looking for new schemes to put in the pipeline. I would GUESS, and this is JUST ME GUESSING, that a good combination of schemes for another PPP would be N22 Ballyvourney - Macroom coupled with M8/25 Dunkettle.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,006 ✭✭✭xabi


    Alan Healy ‏@alanhealy 54m

    The NRA has begun acquiring the necessary lands from 20 property owners to upgrade the Dunkettle Interchange.

    Bl5npbVCYAAeWTd.jpg

    Looks a bit messy coming from the tunnel going to M8.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,561 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    Outstanding news. Anyone like to guess when we'll see ground broken at the sight and how long construction will take ?

    N40 to M8 movement is quite straight forward once the junction is finished. The only messy movement will be to continue from the M8/N8 from the Dunkettle Interchange to the Dunkettle Roundabout. Have to go through the dumbbell interchange as shown in the drawings.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 549 ✭✭✭vince


    I cant see how you get from m8 coming from dublin into the city centre.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 138 ✭✭corkoian


    Any one have the evening echo? I seen a article on the front page with the above picture. Just wondering if there was anything interesting in that article? :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,561 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    vince wrote: »
    I cant see how you get from m8 coming from dublin into the city centre.

    You'll have to use the dumbbell to the right of this render.

    M85.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 549 ✭✭✭vince


    Thats a long way round but no other solution I suppose. Looks great I wonder when this gets moving.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 55 ✭✭phatmanwc


    vince wrote: »
    Thats a long way round but no other solution I suppose. Looks great I wonder when this gets moving.

    Yes, I would have thought that particular traffic movement would have taken priority, i.e., it being the main access point to the city upon arrival. It's a little cumbersome to be expecting people to dog-leg out to Little Island, and then back-track into town. The last thing that we would want to see happening would be for traffic to shoot straight through the tunnel, and use the KR Interchange to get into town instead, applying even more pressure here.

    Anyway, moan aside, it is absolutely fantastic to see this being 'fast-tracked', and they have done a great job otherwise in what is admittedly a very tight amount of space. Let's hope this move along quickly, and that it opens up development to the south, at the Port/Ringaskiddy etc., considering the existing planning precedent that has seemingly been set.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,561 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    I was initially very much against the M8 to Lower Glanmire Road movement.

    However, in the grand scheme of things, this movement will probably take up less than 10% of the total movements at this junction. The dumbbell which this movement will entail will be perfectly capable of taking the traffic load for this movement even at rush hour I suspect.

    Considering this is the only mainline movements which will be required to go through the dumbbell, that's not bad at all.


    In the grand scheme of things though, the Kinsale Roundabout should have had this treatment done also. There was plenty of room out there to do a slip road style setup which would have sorted a lot of problems. As it is, the queue down airport hill can be terrible at rush hour


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 991 ✭✭✭MrDerp


    I was initially very much against the M8 to Lower Glanmire Road movement.

    However, in the grand scheme of things, this movement will probably take up less than 10% of the total movements at this junction. The dumbbell which this movement will entail will be perfectly capable of taking the traffic load for this movement even at rush hour I suspect.

    Considering this is the only mainline movements which will be required to go through the dumbbell, that's not bad at all.


    In the grand scheme of things though, the Kinsale Roundabout should have had this treatment done also. There was plenty of room out there to do a slip road style setup which would have sorted a lot of problems. As it is, the queue down airport hill can be terrible at rush hour

    The light sequencing is terrible at the Kinsale Roundabout. The green from both the airport hill and grange road doesn't necessarily coincide with a green to get onto the roundabout. Then there is only a 4 car turn at the light to get onto the roundabout. So traffic is just being put into a holding pattern between the two lights (Grange rd, and roundabout).

    I can see where they are coming from, as it's clearly to prevent traffic backing up onto the N40 in either direction but it really is a mess.

    The first thing I'd do, however, would be to make the exit for Old Kinsale Road to be exit only. Traffic trying to push across 4 lanes here and get to the N40 West causes a lot of problems at any time of the day, and is downright dangerous as they regularly
    1. Get into the N40 East only lane and force their way around the roundabout in the outside lane (I get cut off on my way to Frankfield all the time), then
    2. Stop dead in that lane trying to force there way across the airport lanes to get to N40 West

    It's incredibly frustrating and if it's a truck/bus pulling this stunt the roundabout can get clogged even with low traffic volumes.

    It's not outlandish for traffic to head towards the P&R and join the south link to access the roundabout. I do this myself to get to Grange Rd, regularly, as trying to push across 4 lanes of the roundabout is tricky unless its quiet and you can time it between light changes.


  • Registered Users Posts: 55 ✭✭phatmanwc


    xabi wrote: »
    Looks a bit messy coming from the tunnel going to M8.

    It does, but looking at the schematic posted by AM, I'd imagine they were trying to work with the alignment of the existing roundabout/overbridges, and to incorporate these into the upgrade plans, which would also vastly contribute to traffic management during construction. Hence the 'wavy' nature of the N40/M8 northbound/southbound connections...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,963 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    They also, I would imagine, want to leave the Lower Glanmire Road for traffic coming from the east, and encourage traffic going down the M8 continue along the South Ring and access via the N27.

    Edit: My design was still far, far better though.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,561 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    They also, I would imagine, want to leave the Lower Glanmire Road for traffic coming from the east, and encourage traffic going down the M8 continue along the South Ring and access via the N27.

    Edit: My design was still far, far better though.

    Wouldn't think that at all. The Kinsale Roundabout is bad enough as it is without adding Dublin to City Centre traffic for no reason. That Dumbbell is fine to handle the expected levels of Dublin to Cork City Centre traffic, even at peak hours. Of the traffic going through the dumbbell, upwards of 70% will be for that one movements.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 822 ✭✭✭zetalambda


    From another angle:

    M84.jpg
    xabi wrote: »
    Alan Healy ‏@alanhealy 54m

    The NRA has begun acquiring the necessary lands from 20 property owners to upgrade the Dunkettle Interchange.



    Looks a bit messy coming from the tunnel going to M8.

    Tunnel to M8 is pretty straight forward. M8 to city center is a bit messy. You'll have to come off the motorway before the tunnel, swing left up to a small roundabout, over the overpass and swing right at another roundabout to get back on to the N25 towards the city. Page 10 & 15 on this PDF:

    http://n8n25dunkettle.jacobs.com/docs/32102066%20Dunkettle%20EIS%20VOL%203%20Figures%20-%20Fig%201.1.1%20to%20Fig%202.4.1.PDF


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,561 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    Might as well throw up all the renders.

    2vjzoeb.png
    2uogirq.png
    imt0gp.png
    kcjv9s.png
    25tw1me.png
    2i1oxg5.png
    16hw0wh.png
    2z7pqg6.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,561 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    Junction Movements

    2z843rk.png
    25rlgya.png
    2199yq8.png
    2mp0wwg.png
    25a51km.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,216 ✭✭✭cargo


    Is the fact that you need to go through 2 RA's to get from M8 to City not going to be a huge drawback to those designs? I'm not from the area but I do travel through this junction from time to time and its normally this movement I take. Or am I just overly worrying. Will this detour be fine once all the other traffic is taken off this movement?Will these RA's have slip for left turns at least?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,561 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    cargo wrote: »
    Is the fact that you need to go through 2 RA's to get from M8 to City not going to be a huge drawback to those designs? I'm not from the area but I do travel through this junction from time to time and its normally this movement I take. Or am I just overly worrying. Will this detour be fine once all the other traffic is taken off this movement?Will these RA's have slip for left turns at least?

    I wouldn't worry too much. All of the other mainline movements will be done via slip roads.

    The only mainline movement not being done by slip road is the M8 to Lower Glanmire Road. The way I think about it, is those 2 roundabouts are facilitate that one movement and exit and entry to and from Glounthaune and Little island.

    Traffic going into and out of Glounthaune and Little Island won't be big. For the most part, people going from M8 to Lower Glanmire Road won't have to stop very often at those roundabouts as traffic on them will be so low. Even at rush hour I suspect.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,561 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    Anyone like to guess btw when we'll see construction start on this. Would late 2014 be too soon ?


  • Registered Users Posts: 55 ✭✭phatmanwc


    Anyone like to guess btw when we'll see construction start on this. Would late 2014 be too soon ?

    I would say so, between finalizing CPO, progressing the tender process etc. Assuming funding were to come through immediately (wishful), I'd say the best we could hope for would be preliminary works contracts maybe in the second half of next year; fencing, siting investigation etc...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,106 ✭✭✭antoobrien


    Anyone like to guess btw when we'll see construction start on this. Would late 2014 be too soon ?

    Not likely to happen this year, the tender process will probably take at least 12 months. Your best bet for a realistic timeline is to look at the N25 New Ross bypass project to see how long it takes them to go from tender to financial close. For reference the tender process for the New Ross bypass started in March 2013.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,963 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    The more I look at their design, the more that the M8S - N25W (Dublin to Cork) movement is irritating me. A simple third level on the design and they could plop this movement in. Whether they are trying to keep the whole thing to two levels I'm not sure but looking at it, there is plenty of room. It really is beginning to seem to me to be a very stupid idea.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 260 ✭✭csd


    The more I look at their design, the more that the M8S - N25W (Dublin to Cork) movement is irritating me. A simple third level on the design and they could plop this movement in. Whether they are trying to keep the whole thing to two levels I'm not sure but looking at it, there is plenty of room. It really is beginning to seem to me to be a very stupid idea.

    I'm guessing that they want to send city-bound traffic via the South Link rather than the existing route via the Glanmire Road. It's the only plausible explanation I can think of.

    /csd


  • Registered Users Posts: 55 ✭✭phatmanwc


    csd wrote: »
    I'm guessing that they want to send city-bound traffic via the South Link rather than the existing route via the Glanmire Road. It's the only plausible explanation I can think of.

    /csd

    This has been discussed in the previous pages; I really don't think that's the reasoning, considering the LGR is the much shorter, existing and most obvious entry route to the city from the M8, although I can see why you would suggest it. The South Ring is already under pressure, roundabout aside, and in particular the Kinsale Road Interchange, which would be part of the alternative route, so I don't think the plan is to exacerbate this.

    I think it's really down to cost-benefit considerations, and working within a very onerous site, both topographically and area-wise. Simply, it seems like something had to give without incorporating a third tier, which would have vastly increased the cost, and probably isn't feasible anyway when the plan is to utilise the existing overbridges.

    I have to admit that I was a little perturbed when I saw this movement myself, but it remains to be seen whether it actually is an issue for drivers. It might turn out to be less of an inconvenience than it seems right now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,561 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    IMO, they clearly do not want traffic entering into the city via the South Link. Would cause excessive traffic at both the Kinsale Roundabout and the end of the South Link Road at Eglington Street.

    As others have said, an extra grade separation may have increased costs dramatically. The way I view the junction is that there are 12 main movements and a number of other movements in regards to Little Island and Glounthaune.

    Of the 12 main movements, 11 will freeflow. So 1/12 main movements will have to go through both roundabouts. In addition, another 1/12 may use the roundabouts to access Little Island and Glounthaune.

    All in all, I would think about 10% of the traffic will be using those roundabouts. Even at peak traffic, I doubt there will be more than 3 or 4 cars queueing at each one.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,058 ✭✭✭niloc1951


    IMO, they clearly do not want traffic entering into the city via the South Link. Would cause excessive traffic at both the Kinsale Roundabout and the end of the South Link Road at Eglington Street.

    As others have said, an extra grade separation may have increased costs dramatically. The way I view the junction is that there are 12 main movements and a number of other movements in regards to Little Island and Glounthaune.

    Of the 12 main movements, 11 will freeflow. So 1/12 main movements will have to go through both roundabouts. In addition, another 1/12 may use the roundabouts to access Little Island and Glounthaune.

    All in all, I would think about 10% of the traffic will be using those roundabouts. Even at peak traffic, I doubt there will be more than 3 or 4 cars queueing at each one.

    If a the commuter populations develop further in the Watergrasshill/Rathcormac/Fermoy area and the two roundabouts do cause issues during morning peak time then the residents of Sallybrook and Glanmire better get ready deal with their villages becoming part of a 'rat-run'


  • Registered Users Posts: 55 ✭✭phatmanwc


    niloc1951 wrote: »
    If a the commuter populations develop further in the Watergrasshill/Rathcormac/Fermoy area and the two roundabouts do cause issues during morning peak time then the residents of Sallybrook and Glanmire better get ready deal with their villages becoming part of a 'rat-run'

    Even if the population/traffic volumes do grow significantly, I wouldn't expect this to happen, since tailbacks certainly shouldn't be as bad as they are now, with the Little Island and South Ring movements now being freeflow. Furthermore, the only other significant traffic movements on these roundabouts will be from Glanmire (northside) and exiting the N25 for Little Island (southside); the M8-Lower Glanmire Road movement will have priority over these movements on both roundabouts, and shouldn't be affected by them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,561 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    phatmanwc wrote: »
    the M8-Lower Glanmire Road movement will have priority over these movements on both roundabouts, and shouldn't be affected by them.

    This is the key point. M8 to Lower Glanmire has priority over all others movements at the roundabouts and so traffic should still flow well through them.

    On this basis, I really don't think there should be an issue here. I'd imagine the junction was designed to ensure this movement was given priority on both roundabouts.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 797 ✭✭✭mydiscworld


    I'm guess the NRA have been, or soon will be, allocated the money to finalise these CPOs they began last month.

    Upon completition of that stage, has the money been allocated to commence construction, or is that a whole other issue?


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,145 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    I'm guess the NRA have been, or soon will be, allocated the money to finalise these CPOs they began last month.

    Upon completition of that stage, has the money been allocated to commence construction, or is that a whole other issue?
    There's no money allocated to this yet, and no announcement of how this will happen. Due to cost, this might need to be a PPP.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 797 ✭✭✭mydiscworld


    spacetweek wrote: »
    There's no money allocated to this yet, and no announcement of how this will happen. Due to cost, this might need to be a PPP.

    Cheers.

    It's 'only' going to cost 100m. Not worth a PPP for that, unless bundled with another job, like the Cork to Ringaskiddy project.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,779 ✭✭✭Carawaystick


    Considering irish ten year paper is <2.5% today,
    its hard to see how a ppp could provide better value for money.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,561 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    Cheers.

    It's 'only' going to cost 100m. Not worth a PPP for that, unless bundled with another job, like the Cork to Ringaskiddy project.

    Cork to Ringaskiddy would be considered quite a cheap project too. Prob no more than 150 to 200m.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,561 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    Anyone hoping for funding to be announced today. It is by far the most needed project in Cork and I would think it also has the highest payoff/cost ratio of any project currently on the table. Its relatively low cost is also an attraction.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,145 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    Anyone hoping for funding to be announced today. It is by far the most needed project in Cork and I would think it also has the highest payoff/cost ratio of any project currently on the table. Its relatively low cost is also an attraction.
    We're hoping for a lot of stuff to be funded today :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,241 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    niloc1951 wrote: »
    If a the commuter populations develop further in the Watergrasshill/Rathcormac/Fermoy area and the two roundabouts do cause issues during morning peak time then the residents of Sallybrook and Glanmire better get ready deal with their villages becoming part of a 'rat-run'


    Just posting to update this thread to say that it appears that tailbacks on the M8 and N25 have caused people to use alternative routes. Over the past 2-4 months the "rat-run" through Glanmire (and though we didn't predict it on here, Glounthaune) now sees long tailbacks each morning.

    The longest tailbacks at the interchange itself appear to be M8-Tunnel, N25-Tunnel (from East and West), Tunnel-N25 (Mostly Eastbound) and at the N25-Little Island interchange.

    The N25-Little Island interchange has been backing up for a few km at peak hours. I really can't see how the current Little Island traffic and Dublin-Cork traffic can coexist at this junction, especially when the Tunnel traffic will free-flow to the junction.

    On the face of it, it looks like the proposed design will just move the existing traffic jams to a few km East of their current location.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,561 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    Just posting to update this thread to say that it appears that tailbacks on the M8 and N25 have caused people to use alternative routes. Over the past 2-4 months the "rat-run" through Glanmire (and though we didn't predict it on here, Glounthaune) now sees long tailbacks each morning.

    The longest tailbacks at the interchange itself appear to be M8-Tunnel, N25-Tunnel (from East and West), Tunnel-N25 (Mostly Eastbound) and at the N25-Little Island interchange.

    The N25-Little Island interchange has been backing up for a few km at peak hours. I really can't see how the current Little Island traffic and Dublin-Cork traffic can coexist at this junction, especially when the Tunnel traffic will free-flow to the junction.

    On the face of it, it looks like the proposed design will just move the existing traffic jams to a few km East of their current location.

    The scheme overall should improve access to Little Island as it will provide an easy avenue at the junction itself into the west most side of Little Island.

    Should take a lot of pressure off the other junction hopefully.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 708 ✭✭✭cork_south


    Any news on how far into the planning stage this project is?
    I have not heard much in the media, but the traffic is steadily getting worse around this junction and particularly the South Ring eastbound.


  • Registered Users Posts: 573 ✭✭✭rebs23


    The traffic around the Dunkettle Interchange is just getting worse and worse with each passing week. Any news of movement on this planned upgrade?


  • Registered Users Posts: 708 ✭✭✭cork_south


    This pic shows how badly the interchange needs to be upgraded.

    http://imgur.com/YIqquBv


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,544 ✭✭✭Hogzy


    cork_south wrote: »
    This pic shows how badly the interchange needs to be upgraded.

    http://imgur.com/YIqquBv

    Oh my god, that looks as though its back as far as Ballincollig.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,142 ✭✭✭Middle Man


    cork_south wrote: »
    This pic shows how badly the interchange needs to be upgraded.

    http://imgur.com/YIqquBv

    ...and we think the M50 is bad!

    OMG!


  • Advertisement
Advertisement