Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Journalism and Cycling 2: the difficult second album

13334363839162

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,484 ✭✭✭Macy0161


    I'd say they were somewhat unlucky in that they were caught in the first period of the extra enforcement policy, where the gardaí are setting the precedent, particularly ahead of the weekend. However, the rules are clear.

    I was stopped in the car yesterday (valid reason), and was quite surprised at the questioning I got when I hit a check point. Definitely wasn't just a token stop and wave through anyway!


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 25,176 Mod ✭✭✭✭CramCycle




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,478 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    It's really ridiculous that the authorities lose their sh*t if you make something self propelling, be it a bike or a scooter or something.
    We should be encouraging things like this, and motorbikes and vespa type scooters in my opinion. Anything that isn't a car.
    The Garda seem to take things like this far more seriously than considerably worse "crimes" that you'd see regularly.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    CramCycle wrote: »

    I loved this bit
    Garda Lynch said that a seized vehicle which is not claimed back, might be destroyed. That was in response to a question from Judge Kelleher who laughed when he asked the guard: “Where is the bike now? Are you driving it yourself?”


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,747 ✭✭✭MojoMaker


    It's really ridiculous that the authorities lose their sh*t if you make something self propelling, be it a bike or a scooter or something.
    We should be encouraging things like this, and motorbikes and vespa type scooters in my opinion. Anything that isn't a car.
    The Garda seem to take things like this far more seriously than considerably worse "crimes" that you'd see regularly.

    We're asking the wrong questions. Surely the core of this should be "was Mr Dos Santos wearing a helmet and hi-viz clothing??"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,478 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    I think there's eScooter legislation being passed today in the Dail. I said this in one of my whatsapp groups with friends and they're all saying "ban them get them off the roads they're dangerous", yes because they cause so much mayhem on the roads. Idiots!
    Some people wouldn't be happy unless there were no bikes or scooters and everyone was driving a Qashqai or Suzuki Vitaras, they're ever so safe.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,084 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    I think there's eScooter legislation being passed today in the Dail. I said this in one of my whatsapp groups with friends and they're all saying "ban them get them off the roads they're dangerous", yes because they cause so much mayhem on the roads. Idiots!
    Some people wouldn't be happy unless there were no bikes or scooters and everyone was driving a Qashqai or Suzuki Vitaras, they're ever so safe.

    What makes them look dangerous is they are mostly ridden by kids.
    There are a few round my estate who hop off paths onto the road without looking or drive up the wrong side of the road but they are no more dangerous than all the kids running across the road or playing soccer on the road really


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,709 ✭✭✭Tombo2001


    breezy1985 wrote: »
    What makes them look dangerous is they are mostly ridden by kids.
    There are a few round my estate who hop off paths onto the road without looking or drive up the wrong side of the road but they are no more dangerous than all the kids running across the road or playing soccer on the road really

    This.

    I've a big bugbear around the fact that people see kids in scooters, and think scooters are dangerous, they see kids on bikes and think cyclists are dangerous.

    But they never never see teenagers in cars and think cars are dangerous.

    Its prime double think.

    And the tragic irony here is that cars are phenomenally more dangerous when driven by teenagers, compared with bikes or scooters.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,084 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Tombo2001 wrote: »
    This.

    I've a big bugbear around the fact that people see kids in scooters, and think scooters are dangerous, they see kids on bikes and think cyclists are dangerous.

    But they never never see teenagers in cars and think cars are dangerous.

    Its prime double think.

    And the tragic irony here is that cars are phenomenally more dangerous when driven by teenagers, compared with bikes or scooters.

    Insurance companies certainly see teenagers as high risk in a car given the premium they charge.

    Difference is there are very young kids on bikes and scooters but because people who don't like bikes see what they want to see they refuse to make the distinction between a 12yo and a commuter on a bike but are happy to make the distinction between a car commuter and lads re enacting the circuit of Ireland rally on country roads or doing 60 in a 30 residental zone


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,478 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    Tombo2001 wrote: »
    This.

    I've a big bugbear around the fact that people see kids in scooters, and think scooters are dangerous, they see kids on bikes and think cyclists are dangerous.

    But they never never see teenagers in cars and think cars are dangerous.

    Its prime double think.

    And the tragic irony here is that cars are phenomenally more dangerous when driven by teenagers, compared with bikes or scooters.

    There were a few teenagers killed in cars last year that spring to mind, but they prefer to focus on scooters and tiny engines on bicycles.
    When are they going to put speed limiters on cars?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,804 ✭✭✭✭tomasrojo


    Tombo2001 wrote: »

    And the tragic irony here is that cars are phenomenally more dangerous when driven by teenagers, compared with bikes or scooters.

    There was some research done in the UK that suggested that cars were more dangerous to the teenagers driving the car as well as those outside the car, compared with teenagers getting around by other transport modes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,709 ✭✭✭Tombo2001




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,478 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    God that's horrific. It has been proven time and time again that if you want to murder someone here, use a car and you'll get off lightly.

    https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/courtandcrime/arid-40191264.html

    This wan didn't even do any time at all for trying to run over 2 teenage girls.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,999 ✭✭✭Tenzor07


    God that's horrific. It has been proven time and time again that if you want to murder someone here, use a car and you'll get off lightly.

    https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/courtandcrime/arid-40191264.html

    This wan didn't even do any time at all for trying to run over 2 teenage girls.

    Ah sure 'tis a bit of history with that particular one boss: https://www.sundayworld.com/crime/courts/five-before-court-over-alleged-hit-and-run-car-park-feud-incident-39498616.html


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,210 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    i don't remember reading *that* enid blyton book when i was a kid.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,051 ✭✭✭cletus


    https://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/kerry-co-council-express-concerns-over-any-delays-to-greenway-plan-1064614.html

    At least it looks like Kerry Co Co are eager to push on with the development


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 25,176 Mod ✭✭✭✭CramCycle


    Tombo2001 wrote: »
    To this day, I still can't get around people driving off after an accident. It's so bizarre, the complete lack of what I would define as basic morality is astounding. I've seen both sides of it myself but thankfully not on any incident this serious, witnessed drivers go round a body on the road and continue on. I mean, where did we go wrong.

    A friend postulated that its basic survivor mentality. You stay, you definitely get in trouble, and there appears to be no extra leniency unlike other countries given for doing the right thing. Whereas if you run, you might not get caught but so long as you apologise and seem contrite, you will almost certainly receive the same sentence or less than you would have for doing the right thing. This led me down the path that we have a lot of higher functioning sociopaths in society and also that we should adjust our legal system to encourage some sense of morality in those who are incapable of it. Personally I couldn't run, maybe I am the idiot though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,472 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    God that's horrific. It has been proven time and time again that if you want to murder someone here, use a car and you'll get off lightly.

    https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/courtandcrime/arid-40191264.html

    This wan didn't even do any time at all for trying to run over 2 teenage girls.

    Shame that the judge didn't take her up on her offer; "I’ll go to jail for you."


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,472 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Tenzor07 wrote: »

    The link showed up this interesting headline, which is the kind of driving I could probably get behind.

    539627.jpg


    https://www.sundayworld.com/crime/courts/soldier-charged-with-carless-driving-said-gardai-pulled-gun-on-him-39975057.html


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 25,176 Mod ✭✭✭✭CramCycle


    Does that mean he's out of the Army, I have vague recollection that getting a conviction would lead to dismissal.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,084 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Theft is just seen by many as an unavoidable risk you take when you cycle.

    Sick to death too having to defend myself when I'm not elated and grateful when those stupid wheel locks get installed somewhere


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,318 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle




  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,210 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    to be fair, the cyclists are probably living longer by cycling, even with the NO2.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,474 ✭✭✭TheChizler


    breezy1985 wrote: »
    Theft is just seen by many as an unavoidable risk you take when you cycle.

    Sick to death too having to defend myself when I'm not elated and grateful when those stupid wheel locks get installed somewhere
    Some of them aren't too bad if they're high enough to get a u-lock around the frame by the rear wheel, too many people just lock their quick-release wheel to them.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,804 ✭✭✭✭tomasrojo


    TheChizler wrote: »
    Some of them aren't too bad if they're high enough to get a u-lock around the frame by the rear wheel, too many people just lock their quick-release wheel to them.
    The wheel grabbers/toast racks have the additional problem that you can cut through them with bolt cutters.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,035 ✭✭✭✭Stark


    to be fair, the cyclists are probably living longer by cycling, even with the NO2.

    Also apparently it's worse if you're sitting in a car as the air intake is lower to the ground.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,804 ✭✭✭✭tomasrojo


    Stark wrote: »
    Also apparently it's worse if you're sitting in a car as the air intake is lower to the ground.

    Well, this seems to have been a pretty famous article about that, and seems to agree with you:
    “Children sitting in the backseat of vehicles are likely to be exposed to dangerous levels [of air pollution],” said King. “You may be driving a cleaner vehicle but your children are sitting in a box collecting toxic gases from all the vehicles around you.”
    A range of experiments, some as far back as 2001, have shown that drivers inside vehicles are exposed to far higher levels of air pollution than those walking or cycling along the same urban routes.
    “It is nine to 12 times higher inside the car than outside,” he said. “Children are in the back of the car and often the car has the fans on, just sucking the fresh exhaust coming out of the car or lorry in front of them straight into the back of the car.”
    https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/jun/12/children-risk-air-pollution-cars-former-uk-chief-scientist-warns


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,484 ✭✭✭Macy0161


    tomasrojo wrote: »
    The wheel grabbers/toast racks have the additional problem that you can cut through them with bolt cutters.
    Yes, I continue to point this out in my workplace - I had a motorbike chain long enough to loop through the frame, but you'd go through the rack quicker than most of the locks.

    I keep asking for sheffield stands, but apparently, we're getting a cage and wheel racks. :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,474 ✭✭✭TheChizler


    tomasrojo wrote: »
    The wheel grabbers/toast racks have the additional problem that you can cut through them with bolt cutters.
    Same as the u lock no? Or are they normally harder steel?


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,210 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    Macy0161 wrote: »
    I keep asking for sheffield stands, but apparently, we're getting a cage and wheel racks. :rolleyes:
    i suspect a cage - depending on where it's situated - could be the most secure option of all.
    in our place, many people didn't even bother locking their bikes, it was a cage only cyclists had access to; you had to register for your swipe to allow you access.


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,318 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    @Macy0161 - it could be worse - you could have gotten this...

    https://twitter.com/commuteroo/status/1350789123783725057


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,004 ✭✭✭what_traffic


    Keep fighting Macy0161
    Still need good Sheffield stands within a cage.
    Know of a workplace that had a cage(going back 6/7 years ago), thieves cut out the lock around the section around the cage lock with a snips). Was very poor design.
    Had two wheel gripper toaster stands within the cage, + demand was way higher + cage was big, which resulted in a no of bikes been stolen as they were unlocked (those using the wheel grippers had bikes stolen as only thing they could lock was the front wheel) plus these type of stands are a pain to use anyhow. Quick release and away they went. They installed proper galvanized steel panel around the door lock after that and added Sheffield stands within the cage.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,484 ✭✭✭Macy0161


    TheChizler wrote: »
    Same as the u lock no? Or are they normally harder steel?
    Not the ones in my place anyway. I reckon my weak af cycling upper body would get through them with bolt cutters of decent length/ leverage.

    I've been arguing for a cage too, but I still think it should have sheffield stands within it. Cage with wheel stands will still mean personally I'll be compromising on the bike I'll use rather than my preferred.


  • Posts: 2,799 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    God that's horrific. It has been proven time and time again that if you want to murder someone here, use a car and you'll get off lightly.

    https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/courtandcrime/arid-40191264.html

    This wan didn't even do any time at all for trying to run over 2 teenage girls.

    That's outrageous, but she wasn't treated lightly because she was in a car. Because of what she is.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,804 ✭✭✭✭tomasrojo


    TheChizler wrote: »
    Same as the u lock no? Or are they normally harder steel?

    Depends on the u-lock, but good u-locks are hardened steel. The wheel-grabber racks arent't made out of hardened steel (it's expensive), and they're quite thin compared to a good u-lock. It's on the extreme end, but a Fahgettaboudit mini u-lock is 18mm of hardened steel.

    You also can get a u-lock far away from the ground with a Sheffield stand, where it's hard to use the ground for extra leverage, which is the standard technique for busting good u-locks with bolt cutters. Your lock usually ends up much closer to the ground with wheel-grabbers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,804 ✭✭✭✭tomasrojo


    I have to say that, as far as I'm aware, the usual style of stealing bikes from wheel-grabbers, as already mentioned, is to uncouple the front wheel and replace it with the front wheel of another bike.

    Which obviously is a technique that can be deployed against Sheffield stands, in the right circumstances. I was very taken by this two-act play in one picture I saw in UCD one day:
    539875.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,709 ✭✭✭Tombo2001



    A Dublin Cycling survey showed that many people who had bikes stolen had locked their bikes at the time of theft.

    And yet the survey would indicate it was somehow the bike owners fault that their bikes were stolen.

    A Dublin Cycling survey would do well to look at what happens to bikes when they are stolen; why it is so easy to sell a stolen bike.

    Or why insurance companies like to sponsor cycling 'be safe be seen' initiatives, and use cyclists as a feel good in their advertising, but wont offer bike theft insurance.

    Or why nobody is ever punished for stealing a bike.

    Nobody steals a bike. They steal 'near cash'.

    The hi viz wasnt bright enough, they werent far enough to the left of the road, the lock was strong enough (or dont you know you actually need 6 U Locks on your bike and they all need to made from fortified platinum).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,804 ✭✭✭✭tomasrojo


    Tombo2001 wrote: »
    A Dublin Cycling survey showed that many people who had bikes stolen had locked their bikes at the time of theft.

    And yet the survey would indicate it was somehow their fault.

    A Dublin Cycling survey would do well to look at what happens to bikes when they are stolen; why it is so easy to sell a stolen bike.

    Nobody steals a bike. They steal 'near cash'.


    I think they found that a lot of the locked bikes were locked with cable locks though. You also get people with a decent enough Kryptonite lock and the cable, and they secure the bike with the cable, and treat the lock itself like a padlock on the cable, not securing the frame.

    It's not the fault of the victim, but it is something everyone can make much less likely.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,709 ✭✭✭Tombo2001


    tomasrojo wrote: »
    I think they found that a lot of the locked bikes were locked with cable locks though. You also get people with a decent enough Kryptonite lock and the cable, and they secure the bike with the cable, and treat the lock itself like a padlock on the cable, not securing the frame.

    It's not the fault of the victim, but it is something everyone can make much less likely.

    Sorry, but its firmly pointing the finger in the direction of the victim.

    Same as the gardai always banging on about how cyclists dont know their (stolen) bike's registration number, when the reality is if they did it wouldnt make a blind bit of difference to them getting their bike back.

    And given that bike theives can cut through a U lock in less than a minute using axle grinders from Lidl.....no I dont think it makes anything far less likely.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,804 ✭✭✭✭tomasrojo


    Tombo2001 wrote: »
    Sorry, but its firmly pointing the finger in the direction of the victim.

    Same as the gardai always banging on about how cyclists dont know their (stolen) bike's registration number, when the reality is if they did it wouldnt make a blind bit of difference to them getting their bike back.

    I strongly disagree. If anything, it's pointing the finger at the person who sold the the bike and the cable lock.

    And whatever about having the serial number, having something better than a cable lock *does* make your bike far less likely to be stolen. You can defeat a cable lock with your bare hands. Nobody should let somebody leave a bike shop with a new bike and just a cable lock.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,709 ✭✭✭Tombo2001


    tomasrojo wrote: »
    I strongly disagree. If anything, it's pointing the finger at the person who sold the the bike and the cable lock.

    And whatever about having the serial number, having something better than a cable lock *does* make your bike far less likely to be stolen. You can defeat a cable lock with your bare hands. Nobody should let somebody leave a bike shop with a new bike and just a cable lock.

    Disagree, anyone who spends any way decent amount of money on a bike gets a U Lock. Nobody spends decent money on a bike and gets a cheap cable lock. Any bike theif prefers to steal a good bike, hence their dexterity with U Locks.


    The only exception is kids bikes, because a 12 year is likely to lose the key to a good U Lock. There is a clear market here for good, secure locks that a child can use, the market place does not cater for this at all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,035 ✭✭✭✭Stark


    I see it as a bit of an arms race at times. My kryptonite new york lock has worked well in the time I have it but sometimes I wonder if the main reason for that is the bikes with cable locks parked next to mine are easier pickings. I'm sure if everyone used good locks, the scumbags would just up their game and start carrying better tools around.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,804 ✭✭✭✭tomasrojo


    Tombo2001 wrote: »

    And given that bike theives can cut through a U lock in less than a minute using axle grinders from Lidl.....no I dont think it makes anything far less likely.

    Yes, it does. Angle grinders aren't used by most thieves. What you're arguing is that it's impossible to make your bike unstealable, which is a different argument.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,804 ✭✭✭✭tomasrojo


    Tombo2001 wrote: »
    Disagree, anyone who spends any way decent amount of money on a bike gets a U Lock. Any bike theif prefers to steal a good bike, hence their dexterity with U Locks.

    I know plenty of people who bought a modest bike and a cable lock. Mostly had the bike stolen within a few weeks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,709 ✭✭✭Tombo2001


    tomasrojo wrote: »
    Yes, it does. Angle grinders aren't used by most thieves. What you're arguing is that it's impossible to make your bike unstealable, which is a different argument.

    I would argue that if you lock your bike at particular sheffield stands in the city, if its a decent bike then no matter how good the u-lock then it will be gone in a matter of days.

    I would also argue that it would be far far more effective to target bike theives and in particular their ability to sell bikes easily. Make it mandatory to display serial number in every on line ad, and every time a bike shop buys or sells a second hand bike.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,804 ✭✭✭✭tomasrojo


    Stark wrote: »
    I see it as a bit of an arms race at times. My kryptonite new york lock has worked well in the time I have it but sometimes I wonder if the main reason for that is the bikes with cable locks parked next to mine are easier pickings. I'm sure if everyone used good locks, the scumbags would just up their game and start carrying better tools around.

    A lot of thieves are just teenagers wandering around looking for something to steal. They steal the bikes with cable locks, or bronze/silver-rated u-locks that can be broken by rotating the bike and using it as a lever

    There are better prepared thieves who are opportunistic and use bolt cutters that can be hung around their neck or hidden in a bag, or use snips or metal bars.

    And then there are people who are determined and use angle grinders, who are looking for expensive bikes/e-bikes.

    You can't do much about the last group, but they're not the biggest group.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,804 ✭✭✭✭tomasrojo


    Tombo2001 wrote: »
    I would argue that if you lock your bike at particular sheffield stands in the city, if its a decent bike then no matter how good the u-lock then it will be gone in a matter of days.

    I've been locking bikes in the city centre for decades and never had one stolen. Because I have good locks. One will be stolen eventually. But I'll have had decades of happy, relatively care-free cycling, rather than waiting for the gardaí to care.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,210 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    Tombo2001 wrote: »
    A Dublin Cycling survey would do well to look at what happens to bikes when they are stolen; why it is so easy to sell a stolen bike.
    i think this is outside the remit/expertise/capability of DCC, to be fair.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,747 ✭✭✭MojoMaker


    tomasrojo wrote: »
    I've been locking bikes in the city centre for decades and never had one stolen. Because I have good locks. One will be stolen eventually. But I'll have had decades of happy, relatively care-free cycling, rather than waiting for the gardaí to care.

    Interested in what you use? Have been lucky enough to always be able to bring a bike inside with me or park it at fairly private locations in the suburbs and thus never had to really think about expensive bike security. Have a few decent locks for a motorcycle, made somewhat easy by underseat storage of course - a 5kg chain is no issue when it's being transported as part of the bike etc.

    What's the best pound-for-pound solution for bike security in relatively unsecured locations?


Advertisement