Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

DNA Analysis

1356722

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,691 ✭✭✭Lia_lia


    dubhthach wrote: »
    What part ofEngland is your father from? Many of British samples are going to have "Scandinavian" show up as a component.

    https://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2015/06/23/ancestrydna-the-viking-in-the-room/

    With regards to the genetic communities they will give you a percentage on how accurate they think they are, do the Irish ones match up with your mother's known ancestry?

    That's interesting. My Father's family are from Lancashire (north west England). My Mother is actually half English, I should have mentioned that. Her Mother is from London. Her father's family are from Kerry. So the Munster connection makes sense. Although it was 20% for each one. Not a huge chance but it does make sense!

    I have an Irish surname (from my Dad's side) and they do have Irish ancestry.

    My cousin in England was actually making a family tree of my Dad's side, so I really should get onto him about it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,777 ✭✭✭BowWow


    Lia_lia wrote: »
    Got my Ancestry results today. My test was received on March 27th, results today.
    Interesting enough!
    Ireland 53%
    Great Britain 21%
    Scandinavia 15%
    Italy/Greece 3%
    Iberian peninsula 2%
    Finland 2%
    Europe East <1%
    Middle East 2%
    Caucasus <1%
    For genetic communities I got: North Connacht, Munster Irish, Northern England, Southern Enland, English in West Midlands.

    My Mother is Irish and Father is English. I want to do one with another company now..

    Thanks for sharing - interesting they received your test on the 27th. March and its completed, mine is in since 24th March so hopefully I'll have it soon.

    Instead of doing another test why don't you log your Gedcom file?


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 27,264 CMod ✭✭✭✭spurious


    Hope all the folks here getting the DNA tests for genealogical reasons (no matter which company) are uploading them to GEDmatch and filling out a tree.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,691 ✭✭✭Lia_lia


    Just uploaded to GEDmatch there.

    Some good tests on it. Much more information.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,629 ✭✭✭googled eyes


    So my test arrived with Ancestry on the 23rd of March, processing started on the 8th of May. Really hoping that the results come in soon.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,953 ✭✭✭JamboMac


    What would you do if you found a brother or sister you didn't know about before this?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,900 ✭✭✭InTheTrees


    Lia_lia wrote: »
    Just uploaded to GEDmatch there.

    Some good tests on it. Much more information.

    What is "gedmatch" and how do I upload my results to it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 683 ✭✭✭KildareFan


    my results arrived at last - 78% Irish, 15% English, 2% Europe, 1% West Asia... so someone was traipsing around Turkey and Asia minor.

    I'm surprised that most of the DNA matches from Ancestry are on my mother's side. I was getting a bit worried, but then found a match with a descendant of my dad's mother's line [phew!]. That was a woman born in the 1850s, ended up in West Virginia. So it does work...


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 27,264 CMod ✭✭✭✭spurious


    InTheTrees wrote: »
    What is "gedmatch" and how do I upload my results to it?

    It's a free site https://www.gedmatch.com/login1.php where you can compare your DNA results with others, even if they did not take the same test as you.

    I was tested under Family Tree DNA Autosomal tests, so I can only speak of it, but I would imagine the others have a similar procedure.

    First you register and account on GEDMatch - it's free.
    The next page you see will have an option 'Raw DNA file uploads'. They have detailed instructions on what to do for Ancestry, FTDNA, WeGene, MyHeritage results and another for 'generic' results.

    When you upoload your results, give it a couple of days and it will match you to those already uploaded. The numbers are much larger than any of the individual companies databases, so you will get more results.

    GEDMatch has a number of useful tools you can use, some at a small cost.

    Their eye color prediction was scarily accurate in my case.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,691 ✭✭✭Lia_lia


    spurious wrote: »

    Their eye color prediction was scarily accurate in my case.

    Same. Just logged in there and data has already been uploaded. Lots more matches. Thanks to the posters in this thread for making me aware of this..

    Great info here about GEDmatch: Tip for using GEDmatch.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,900 ✭✭✭InTheTrees


    Yes. GEDmatch looks great, I uploaded my Ancestry results last night.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,995 ✭✭✭Ipso


    Also kits are assigned a prefix: A for uploads from Ancestry, M for 23and me and F or T from Family Tree DNA.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,162 ✭✭✭Wyldwood


    For anyone who did Ancestry testing, as well as uploading the raw DNA data to Gedmatch, it's also worth uploading the results to FTDNA (Family Tree) in order to get as many matches as possible. It's free to upload the DNA results and you can upgrade fro $19 to unlock your ethnicity.

    My big gripe is all those matches who don't bother to upload even a basic tree with family names. No hope of finding common ancestors if there are no clues given. Also, the number of people who don't reply to queries is frustrating, makes me wonder why they bother doing the DNA test.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,953 ✭✭✭JamboMac


    Got my DNA 92% Irish
    4% Europe west
    2% Great Britain
    1% Finland/north west Russia
    Less than 1% Scandinavia.

    Really wish I had a better definition for Europe west.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,204 ✭✭✭jos28


    Posted mine off on 2nd April and just got the results.
    Ethnicity Estimate
    69% Ireland
    29% Great Britain
    2% Other regions

    They've only listed one genetic community which is Munster (no surprise there). Do you have to have a full Ancestry subscription to make the most of the results. I've started messaging the suggested connections - got one back already. She's based in Montreal and I know exactly where she fits into my tree. I've also uploaded my results and tree up to Gedcom. Any advice would be much appreciated.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,777 ✭✭✭BowWow


    jos28 wrote: »
    Posted mine off on 2nd April and just got the results.
    Ethnicity Estimate
    69% Ireland
    29% Great Britain
    2% Other regions

    They've only listed one genetic community which is Munster (no surprise there). Do you have to have a full Ancestry subscription to make the most of the results. I've started messaging the suggested connections - got one back already. She's based in Montreal and I know exactly where she fits into my tree. I've also uploaded my results and tree up to Gedcom. Any advice would be much appreciated.

    Did your results arrive on a sunday?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,204 ✭✭✭jos28


    I'm not sure when they updated my profile with my results. I didn't get an email from Ancestry. I got back from holidays last night and just logged on today to check and there they were.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,953 ✭✭✭JamboMac


    JamboMac wrote: »
    Got my DNA 92% Irish
    4% Europe west
    2% Great Britain
    1% Finland/north west Russia
    Less than 1% Scandinavia.

    Really wish I had a better definition for Europe west.

    Had some fun with GedMatch, but don't understand some of it or what its telling me.

    West european = 57.05
    east european = 9.82
    mediteranian = 24.29
    west asia = 6.69
    northeast asian = .32
    south asian = 1.82

    Anybody understand some of the gedmatch tools could explain what they are telling me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,264 ✭✭✭✭Alicat


    Mine came through at 4 o'clock this morning! They must be working all hours.

    Anyway, I'm pretty Irish. But I found the DNA connection for my poor orphaned, abandoned Nanny! Well worth the money already.

    417997.JPG


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,204 ✭✭✭jos28


    Forgive me if sounds like a stupid question but I've only used Ancestry during 'free' offer times or briefly when I started researching. As I mentioned previously I have my DNA results, I've been messaging the suggested connections. I suppose I really need to see their trees to make the most of this. Can some kind person recommend which subscription would be best. I'll probably only subscribe for a month just to get what I need. Suggestions would be much appreciated.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,900 ✭✭✭InTheTrees


    jos28 wrote: »
    Forgive me if sounds like a stupid question but I've only used Ancestry during 'free' offer times or briefly when I started researching. As I mentioned previously I have my DNA results, I've been messaging the suggested connections. I suppose I really need to see their trees to make the most of this. Can some kind person recommend which subscription would be best. I'll probably only subscribe for a month just to get what I need. Suggestions would be much appreciated.

    If you have your results I'd recommend giving GEDmatch a try.

    I only heard about it from this thread so I'm only a novice but it's free so give it a try before paying at ancestry.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,162 ✭✭✭Wyldwood


    jos28 wrote: »
    Forgive me if sounds like a stupid question but I've only used Ancestry during 'free' offer times or briefly when I started researching. As I mentioned previously I have my DNA results, I've been messaging the suggested connections. I suppose I really need to see their trees to make the most of this. Can some kind person recommend which subscription would be best. I'll probably only subscribe for a month just to get what I need. Suggestions would be much appreciated.

    If you're going for a subscription to Ancestry I'd recommend the Worldwide one as it gives you access to all the records across the globe. I'd also recommend uploading your raw DNA data to FTDNA, with a tree, for more hits.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,204 ✭✭✭jos28


    Cheers, I followed Gedcom instructions here yesterday so here's hoping something shows up there .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,204 ✭✭✭jos28


    Wyldwood wrote: »
    If you're going for a subscription to Ancestry I'd recommend the Worldwide one as it gives you access to all the records across the globe. I'd also recommend uploading your raw DNA data to FTDNA, with a tree, for more hits.

    Thanks Wyldwood, I'll definitely do that. Cheers


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,672 Mod ✭✭✭✭pinkypinky


    Just make sure that you remember to cancel within the month so that you don't get into a rolling subscription. You're right, though, I hadn't considered that I wouldn't be able to make connections with the DNA results. I just sent in my sample yesterday so we'll see how long it takes. I suspect August based on what other people are reporting.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,204 ✭✭✭jos28


    Thanks Pinky, I've set the Google calendar to remind me to unsubscribe :D
    Not having much luck ploughing through the connections yet but here's hoping.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,736 ✭✭✭pawrick


    Got my ancestry results back last night

    Ireland 83%
    Great Britain 15%

    Low Confidence Region
    Iberian Peninsula 1%
    Europe West 1%

    Surprised Italian didn't show up seeing how I have a lot of Italians in my family tree but they are a good bit back in it so I assume have been diluted out on my side of the family.

    Matched with the Irish in Galway DNA community which ties in with the Irish side alright and it found a coupe of 3rd cousins and lots of people further out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 484 ✭✭RGM


    JamboMac wrote: »
    Had some fun with GedMatch, but don't understand some of it or what its telling me.

    West european = 57.05
    east european = 9.82
    mediteranian = 24.29
    west asia = 6.69
    northeast asian = .32
    south asian = 1.82

    Anybody understand some of the gedmatch tools could explain what they are telling me.

    These numbers are meant to be ancient, as in all Europeans will turn up with some Asian in there. They're not meant to be taken at face value.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 484 ✭✭RGM


    Wyldwood wrote: »
    My big gripe is all those matches who don't bother to upload even a basic tree with family names. No hope of finding common ancestors if there are no clues given. Also, the number of people who don't reply to queries is frustrating, makes me wonder why they bother doing the DNA test.

    The vast majority of people testing at this point are doing it purely for the ethnicity percentages.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,953 ✭✭✭JamboMac


    RGM wrote: »
    These numbers are meant to be ancient, as in all Europeans will turn up with some Asian in there. They're not meant to be taken at face value.

    No i understand this one, but not some of the tools as their is zero explanation from it. Like in one it's telling me Amerindian at 1, I would assume that this couldn't be from all European settlers. If it's designed to point out Native American genes somewhere.

    Maybe 1000 of years ago somehow or the tests are pretty much bull.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 14 MAGZERFLOOD




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 311 ✭✭srmf5


    jos28 wrote: »
    Forgive me if sounds like a stupid question but I've only used Ancestry during 'free' offer times or briefly when I started researching. As I mentioned previously I have my DNA results, I've been messaging the suggested connections. I suppose I really need to see their trees to make the most of this. Can some kind person recommend which subscription would be best. I'll probably only subscribe for a month just to get what I need. Suggestions would be much appreciated.

    I'm currently just using the essentials subscription at about £10 per month so I can see trees and contact people. It's the cheapest subscription. I personally don't find Ancestry very good for Irish records. I don't want to pay extra for a worldwide subscription when I might never use it or just look at the odd record. My subscription is purely for use with my DNA results.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,777 ✭✭✭BowWow


    Ireland 64%
    Great Britain 25%
    Scandinavia 5%
    Low Confidence Region
    Finland/Northwest Russia 3%
    Europe East 2%
    Europe West <1%

    Ulster Irish Community - spot on with other research.

    61 days from acknowledgement to results.

    Now for GedMatch...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 311 ✭✭srmf5


    I got my results months ago but I might as well post what I got.

    Ethnicity Estimate
    Ireland 96%
    Great Britain 2%
    Finland/Northwest Russia 1%
    Scandinavia <1%

    Genetic Community
    Connacht Irish (Very Likely 95%) broken down to:
    • North Connacht (Likely 60%)
    • Galway (Possible 20%)

    My paternal aunt didn't have Finland or Scandinavia so that must come from my mum's side. The results are as expected. My family are all from Connacht.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,264 ✭✭✭✭Alicat


    The frustration at having so many DNA matches... with no Family Tree....

    I think the advertising push for the DNA testing (certainly from Ancestry) has brought a new wave of people who are obviously interested in genealogy but didn't realise that they would have to do some ground work too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 683 ✭✭✭KildareFan


    Mine is much as expected:
    78% Irish
    15% British
    6% European
    1% West asian [Turkey, Armenia etc] - that's the bit I want to know more about.

    My genetic community is north midlands, not surprising as 3 out of 4 grandparents came from Dublin/Meath/Westmeath. But no mention of the great granny who came from Inishbofin.

    As with others, feeling frustrated with those who are linked, but no family tree put up, or family tree private or who use initials or aliases so you can't even guess where the relationship is. One very odd second cousin match with a V.H. who is linked with a tree managed by someone else. Someone else hasn't a clue who this VH is and how he/she came to be linked with their tree.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 484 ✭✭RGM


    srmf5 wrote: »
    I got my results months ago but I might as well post what I got.

    Ethnicity Estimate
    Ireland 96%
    Great Britain 2%
    Finland/Northwest Russia 1%
    Scandinavia <1%

    Genetic Community
    Connacht Irish (Very Likely 95%) broken down to:
    • North Connacht (Likely 60%)
    • Galway (Possible 20%)

    My paternal aunt didn't have Finland or Scandinavia so that must come from my mum's side. The results are as expected. My family are all from Connacht.

    It's common for anyone of Irish heritage to show small amounts of Scandinavian. It doesn't necessarily indicate a Scandinavian ancestor within a meaningful time frame. This goes for most small percentages that pop up.

    If you have Irish heritage, you have Viking heritage as well. It's a certainty.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,284 ✭✭✭dubhthach


    There's also fact that trace regions might actually be noise. If you click on any component it will give you a range. So for example I have 89% Ireland, but the range is 77-100% -- they select the middle of the band.

    Trace regions particulary those with >1% are often just noise.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 484 ✭✭RGM


    dubhthach wrote: »
    There's also fact that trace regions might actually be noise. If you click on any component it will give you a range. So for example I have 89% Ireland, but the range is 77-100% -- they select the middle of the band.

    Trace regions particulary those with >1% are often just noise.

    Fair point. In the case of Scandinavian traces in the Irish population though, I tend to think it's not a coincidence.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 760 ✭✭✭p15574


    Ancestry.com denies exploiting users' DNA
    A leading genealogy service, Ancestry.com, has denied exploiting users' DNA following criticism of its terms and conditions.
    http://www.bbc.com/news/business-40045942


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 311 ✭✭srmf5


    RGM wrote: »
    It's common for anyone of Irish heritage to show small amounts of Scandinavian. It doesn't necessarily indicate a Scandinavian ancestor within a meaningful time frame. This goes for most small percentages that pop up.

    If you have Irish heritage, you have Viking heritage as well. It's a certainty.

    I'm well aware that it's probably from Viking times or that it's just noise but I just found it interesting that my aunt didn't have it. Especially since there's a Knott on my mum's side with the surname supposed to be Scandinavian in origin. It's not proof of it or anything. It's just interesting.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,691 ✭✭✭Lia_lia


    RGM wrote: »
    Fair point. In the case of Scandinavian traces in the Irish population though, I tend to think it's not a coincidence.

    I'm guessing my 2% Middle East is noise...haven't an iota where that would have come from!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 484 ✭✭RGM


    If groups of close relatives and groups administered by a particular person were to only count as one each, I now have 18 matches through Ancestry with whom I can document the relation. Like most of you, I can't go back all that far with my tree, so these are all fourth cousins or closer (with a couple exceptions). I think that's wild. The number of people taking these tests now, particularly in America, is crazy.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,953 ✭✭✭JamboMac


    RGM wrote: »
    If groups of close relatives and groups administered by a particular person were to only count as one each, I now have 18 matches through Ancestry with whom I can document the relation. Like most of you, I can't go back all that far with my tree, so these are all fourth cousins or closer (with a couple exceptions). I think that's wild. The number of people taking these tests now, particularly in America, is crazy.

    I have about 118 from 1 3rd cousin to mainly 4th cousins, if you click on those people it will say their ethnicity and how you are linked.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 484 ✭✭RGM


    JamboMac wrote: »
    I have about 118 from 1 3rd cousin to mainly 4th cousins, if you click on those people it will say their ethnicity and how you are linked.

    No, it will estimate the relation (which is often wrong) and if both of you happen to have a tree it may show a hint if a connection is apparent. But most people don't have trees, or have very bad ones. I'm talking about documented connections, as in I know exactly how we are related.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,953 ✭✭✭JamboMac


    RGM wrote: »
    No, it will estimate the relation (which is often wrong) and if both of you happen to have a tree it may show a hint if a connection is apparent. But most people don't have trees, or have very bad ones. I'm talking about documented connections, as in I know exactly how we are related.

    I think that's ancestrys hope lots of up-selling although one potential 3rd cousin has over 1,000+ on his tree. But many haven't logged in 2 years. I think if you where adopted the DNA and tree thing is more important then for the rest of us.

    Also can't do a lot since previous generations didn't keep any history.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 484 ✭✭RGM


    JamboMac wrote: »
    I think if you where adopted the DNA and tree thing is more important then for the rest of us.

    Also can't do a lot since previous generations didn't keep any history.

    What? The "tree thing" is the entire point of this board.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,953 ✭✭✭JamboMac


    RGM wrote: »
    What? The "tree thing" is the entire point of this board.

    Some people's trees have black holes, some family trees can't be fully built, if the paperwork is no longer their or the person who knows is gone. Genealogy isn't 100% about trees.

    So some links may not be able to be fully defined for whatever reason. I come from a massive family I didn't go searching for more cousins and many others do the same. I got back 4 generations with the limited knowledge that I and my parents had.

    But documentation after this is difficult as things could have been destroyed and some information isn't online and you need to travel to these locations.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,629 ✭✭✭googled eyes


    Just got my results earlier. Kind of as I expected. Irish with a sprinkling on British and Viking. ( You'll grab that 1% viking from my cold dead hands!)

    Europe 99%

    Ireland 94%
    Great Britain 2%
    Finland/Northwest Russia 1%
    Iberian Peninsula 1%
    Scandinavia 1%

    West Asia < 1%
    Low Confidence Region
    Caucasus


    Genetic Communities

    Kerry
    Ulster Irish

    Ancestry has given me 84 4th cousins and 1 possible ancestor link

    How long does Gedmatch take to complete?


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,672 Mod ✭✭✭✭pinkypinky


    Gedmatch: usually overnight or 2 days at most.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



Advertisement