Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Extreme hate preacher banned from all Europe to visit Ireland

«1

Comments

  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,063 CMod ✭✭✭✭Ten of Swords


    In this video he is talking about the Pulse nightclub shooting where 49 patrons of a gay bar were murdered. If you don't watch the whole thing at least skip ahead and listen to 2.05 - 2.20. I have no words.

    This is what he stands for;



    His planned meeting point (if he is allowed to land) is McDonalds on the Corballis Road (just next to the airport) at 9am. He details his itinerary in the below video starting at 6.30



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,104 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,802 ✭✭✭✭suicide_circus


    he even hates the Rosary rattlers!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,305 ✭✭✭✭branie2


    And rightly so


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,104 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    branie2 wrote: »
    And rightly so

    Rightly so to?

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,070 ✭✭✭Franz Von Peppercorn


    Rightly so to?

    Hating catholics. I assume.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,305 ✭✭✭✭branie2


    That the hate preacher was banned


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,188 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    He should be banned but his views would not be outline in many centres of worship here or in Britain or Europe.


  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 12,898 Mod ✭✭✭✭JupiterKid


    It wouldn’t surprise me in the least if this piece of dog excrement is an extreme closet case...


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    JupiterKid wrote:
    It wouldn’t surprise me in the least if this piece of dog excrement is an extreme closet case...

    FFS. This trope is ridiculous


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,104 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    FFS. This trope is ridiculous

    It happens regularly

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Registered Users Posts: 36 declantm


    I'm so gonna get banned but I'm in two minds when it comes to free speech. Should we let people like Anderson and Westboro Baptist Church into Ireland to spout they're hate filled diatribe and let people see how horrible and nasty they are or should we just ban them outright?


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,063 CMod ✭✭✭✭Ten of Swords


    Free speech should not, and does not, include hate speech. Dutch minister for Justice Mark Harbers summed it up perfectly last week I thought
    There is no place in a democratic nation like ours for discrimination, incitement to hatred or intolerance and violence on any grounds...

    Civil liberties are not a license for intolerant behaviour that limits the freedoms of others...

    The government is committed to taking strong action against extremist speakers who, by spreading their beliefs. restrict the freedoms of others or incite people to hatred or violence.

    The Dutch ban has meant he is banned from the entire Schengen area and the UK previously banned him. I think Ireland is the only EU nation he is not banned from (open to correction). It is a pity Ireland is too spineless to take a stand and ban this preacher.


  • Registered Users Posts: 36 declantm


    In the USA hate speech is allowed, so people like Anderson are allowed to constantly spread their vitriol and hatred but in Europe we're on the fence. We have several general policy recommendations but nothing outright banning hate speech. I agree that Ireland should ban him, but I would like to see what the post reaction to his obscene ramblings would show. I would expect most people wouldn't even notice he was here. In fairness, at most he's a blip on the radar.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,589 ✭✭✭✭cj maxx


    In this video he is talking about the Pulse nightclub shooting where 49 patrons of a gay bar were murdered. If you don't watch the whole thing at least skip ahead and listen to 2.05 - 2.20. I have no words.

    This is what he stands for;



    His planned meeting point (if he is allowed to land) is McDonalds on the Corballis Road (just next to the airport) at 9am. He details his itinerary in the below video starting at 6.30


    Forced myself to finish watching one of the videos . Pure unadulterated shyte!
    I hope he gets lynched if he sets foot in Ireland


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,165 ✭✭✭lottpaul


    Glad to say he has been banned - the first person to be excluded from the country under laws introduced in 1999.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,063 CMod ✭✭✭✭Ten of Swords


    Remarkable, I honestly thought Ireland didn't have the bottle to issue a ban order.

    The cynical part of me genuinely wonders if this is in any part influenced by the local elections.

    In any case I'm glad he won't be bringing his vitriol to Ireland and even if his event does still go ahead (he has previously said he lined up alternate speakers if he is banned) it sends a clear message to those who would come to Ireland and preach intolerance.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/anti-gay-preacher-is-first-ever-banned-from-ireland-under-exclusion-powers-1.3889848


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,188 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    The only message it sends is don't have those views and be a preaching Pastor.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    In any case I'm glad he won't be bringing his vitriol to Ireland and even if his event does still go ahead (he has previously said he lined up alternate speakers if he is banned) it sends a clear message to those who would come to Ireland and preach intolerance.

    Can you not see any irony in that statement?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,488 ✭✭✭Goodshape


    Can you not see any irony in that statement?

    Intolerance of extreme hate preachers is, I think, something we can live with.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Goodshape wrote:
    Intolerance of extreme hate preachers is, I think, something we can live with.

    I can't. I don't like the idea that we can shut down people's right to say what they believe in just because we don't agree with it.

    I'd prefer to be able to hear what my opponents have to say rather than give them credence by making their words unspeakable.

    But sure, as long as you don't hear anything that offends you, life is good.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,412 ✭✭✭✭salmocab


    I can't. I don't like the idea that we can shut down people's right to say what they believe in just because we don't agree with it.

    I'd prefer to be able to hear what my opponents have to say rather than give them credence by making their words unspeakable.

    But sure, as long as you don't hear anything that offends you, life is good.

    Nobody is shutting down his right to say what he believes just where he can be when he says it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,495 ✭✭✭✭eviltwin


    What venue was due to host him does anyone know?


  • Registered Users Posts: 489 ✭✭Edgarfrndly


    I can't. I don't like the idea that we can shut down people's right to say what they believe in just because we don't agree with it.

    I'd prefer to be able to hear what my opponents have to say rather than give them credence by making their words unspeakable.

    But sure, as long as you don't hear anything that offends you, life is good.

    He can say whatever he wants. He is not a citizen of this state and as such does not have a right to be here. Entry into Ireland is a privilege and that privilege can be revoked. His intention was to come here to preach hate.

    How many times does this have to be said so people like you understand it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,193 ✭✭✭✭RobbingBandit


    Who do I contact about background checks on unverified immigration flowing into this country on a weekly basis.


  • Registered Users Posts: 489 ✭✭Edgarfrndly


    Who do I contact about background checks on unverified immigration flowing into this country on a weekly basis.

    If you think someone is here illegally, you can always report them. EU citizens don't require background checks as they have a legal right to be here.

    Anything else?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,966 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    I'm tempted to contact him and read out what he wants said.
    I wouldn't agree with anything he has to say and it would be very tough for me to read it out but I don't like people being prevented from airing their opinions.
    Banning him from coming into the country because you disagree with his beliefs is ludicrous.
    Nanny state mentality like we can't look after ourselves.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,193 ✭✭✭✭RobbingBandit


    A whole lot of effort has gone into investigating this guy yet thousands come through the borders here unchecked whom ever did the checking on this guy why aren't they using that shrewd sense for more productive means


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,312 ✭✭✭paw patrol


    I can't. I don't like the idea that we can shut down people's right to say what they believe in just because we don't agree with it.

    I'd prefer to be able to hear what my opponents have to say rather than give them credence by making their words unspeakable.

    But sure, as long as you don't hear anything that offends you, life is good.

    its clearly a case of ban the people I don't like
    a worrying development


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,175 ✭✭✭tritriagain


    Banning him only gives him more publicity. If you agree with what he says this will not change your mind. You should be able to listen to these people and then just say" aw would u ever rev up and fu## off."


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,263 ✭✭✭robyntmorton


    A whole lot of effort has gone into investigating this guy yet thousands come through the borders here unchecked whom ever did the checking on this guy why aren't they using that shrewd sense for more productive means

    Yeah, thats a completely separate topic...

    And for those going on about surpressing freedom of speech, think about this:

    Freedom of speech is a right, yes. With any right though, comes a responsibility. In this case the responsibility is to not use that free speech to incite hatred against others. If the authorities have reasonable belief that the main purpose of the visit is to abuse that right, they do have the right and responsibility to say no, as numerous authorities have.

    It neither is nor was a way to silence an opinion that is just not liked.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,488 ✭✭✭Goodshape


    You should be able to listen to these people and then just say" aw would u ever rev up and fu## off."

    Effectively, isn't this exactly what has happened? We're not so isolated that we can't find out what this guy has to say. Google and YouTube and Wikipedia exist. It's perfectly well known what he wants to say, and he has been perfectly well told to rev up and **** off.

    Can he think and say whatever he wants? Sure he can.

    Should we grant him entry to our country to say those things to an audience here? I don't see why we would.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,175 ✭✭✭tritriagain


    Goodshape wrote: »
    Effectively, isn't this exactly what has happened? We're not so isolated that we can't find out what this guy has to say. Google and YouTube and Wikipedia exist. It's perfectly well known what he wants to say, and he has been perfectly well told to rev up and **** off.

    Can he think and say whatever he wants? Sure he can.

    Should we grant him entry to our country to say those things to an audience here? I don't see why we would.


    Fair enough. But where is the actual line for banning people. If he was a high profile Muslim with the same views I don't think he would be banned for fear of the country being labelled rascist


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,488 ✭✭✭Goodshape


    If he was a high profile Muslim with the same views I don't think he would be banned for fear of the country being labelled rascist

    Well that's simply due to our Government's policy of actively suppressing the thoughts and views of rich white American males while kowtowing to anything the Quran has to say. Obviously.

    I mean, the signs are all there if you just close your eyes and imagine them.

    #WakeUpSheeple!


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,063 CMod ✭✭✭✭Ten of Swords


    eagle eye wrote: »
    I'm tempted to contact him and read out what he wants said.
    I wouldn't agree with anything he has to say and it would be very tough for me to read it out

    Let us know how you get on

    :rolleyes:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,175 ✭✭✭tritriagain


    Goodshape wrote: »
    Well that's simply due to our Government's policy of actively suppressing the thoughts and views of rich white American males while kowtowing to anything the Quran has to say. Obviously.

    I mean, the signs are all there if you just close your eyes and imagine them.

    #WakeUpSheeple!
    Oh so I'm imagining homophobic views by certain sections of Islam. Ok. At least I know now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,488 ✭✭✭Goodshape


    Oh so I'm imagining homophobic views by certain sections of Islam. Ok. At least I know now.

    That's nothing at all like what I said.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,175 ✭✭✭tritriagain


    Goodshape wrote: »
    That's nothing at all like what I said.

    I must have picked you up wrong then.i apologise.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    How many times does this have to be said so people like you understand it?

    People like me?

    People who believe that it is ok to speak their mind? It's ok for people to have horrific thoughts once they don't verbalise them?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,104 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    I can't. I don't like the idea that we can shut down people's right to say what they believe in just because we don't agree with it.

    I'd prefer to be able to hear what my opponents have to say rather than give them credence by making their words unspeakable.

    But sure, as long as you don't hear anything that offends you, life is good.

    This isnt about mere offence. This is about someone who is more or less calling for us all to be slaughtered becsuse of our sexual orientation or gender identity. There is a reason over 30 European countries have banned him.

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,104 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    People like me?

    People who believe that it is ok to speak their mind? It's ok for people to have horrific thoughts once they don't verbalise them?

    Incitement to hatred is not ok

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,412 ✭✭✭✭salmocab



    People who believe that it is ok to speak their mind? It's ok for people to have horrific thoughts once they don't verbalise them?

    He has verbalized them so now people know his horrific thoughts. Your argument here is if he had those thoughts but didn’t speak them then we’d be okay with it, when really if he didn’t speak them then we wouldn’t know he had them so couldn’t be okay with them.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I've no interest in hearing what this Pastor has to say, but I fear that banning people from entering the country, because we they inspire hate is wrong.

    As previous posters have mentioned, banning him wont make much difference to people who believe in what he has to say. There is an internet out there, where I'm sure you can find all of his videos/speeches/etc.
    We should probably ban the internet, so that his speeches can't be accessed

    What we really should be focusing on, is why people listen to him, and follow his ideas. Lets figure that out, and see if we can help the people who might be filled with hate. Banning the pastor wont change these peoples thoughts, and has just brought further attention to him.
    I have never heard of this man before, and now I have.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,951 ✭✭✭B0jangles


    Letting people like this in to spread hate has real-world consequences.

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/how-uganda-was-seduced-by-anti-gay-conservative-evangelicals-9193593.html
    One of the first to investigate links between American conservatives and the African anti-gay movement was Kipya Kaoma, a Zambian clergyman living in Boston. Homosexuality was illegal in Uganda under existing colonial laws, he explained, “But nobody was ever arrested or prosecuted based on those old laws. People turned a blind eye to it. Homosexuality was not a political issue.”

    That changed in 2009, Rev Kaoma said, when a group of American evangelicals led by Pastor Scott Lively, a self-proclaimed expert on the “gay movement”, held a series of talks in Uganda. Mr Lively warned audiences that the “evil institution” of homosexuality sought to “prey upon” and recruit Ugandan children in a bid to “defeat the marriage-based society”.

    Dr Frank Mugisha, director of the LGBT rights organisation, Sexual Minorities Uganda (Smug), recently told The Independent on Sunday, “[The idea] of a gay agenda, of recruiting people to homosexuality – that language wasn't used in Uganda pre-2009. [Lively] made my work very difficult and was conspiring with my legislators, but [to Ugandans] he was like God himself. People were worshipping him as if he was from heaven.”

    It's extremely easy to be all 'let them speak and let their arguments be debunked with RATIONALITY' when it's not you they want to exterminate. They don't have rational arguments or rational postions - all they have is bigotry and hatred.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,412 ✭✭✭✭salmocab


    I've no interest in hearing what this Pastor has to say, but I fear that banning people from entering the country, because we they inspire hate is wrong.

    As previous posters have mentioned, banning him wont make much difference to people who believe in what he has to say. There is an internet out there, where I'm sure you can find all of his videos/speeches/etc.
    We should probably ban the internet, so that his speeches can't be accessed

    What we really should be focusing on, is why people listen to him, and follow his ideas. Lets figure that out, and see if we can help the people who might be filled with hate. Banning the pastor wont change these peoples thoughts, and has just brought further attention to him.
    I have never heard of this man before, and now I have.

    But you would have heard of him regardless once he was here, this thread was started before there was an inkling of the government stopping him coming. He would have made all the papers wherever he ended up preaching.
    Banning people from entering the country because they inspire hate seems like a very good idea to me.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    salmocab wrote: »
    But you would have heard of him regardless once he was here, this thread was started before there was an inkling of the government stopping him coming. He would have made all the papers wherever he ended up preaching.
    Banning people from entering the country because they inspire hate seems like a very good idea to me.

    Just to clarify, this pastor sounds like an idiot, and I would seriously judge anyone who went to listen to him speak.
    My concern is, that determining what equates to inspiring hate is not binary.
    I fear that one banning leads to another, and then another.
    If this guy becomes the precedence for who should be banned, and then next year, someone who is 99% as hateful tries to come to Ireland, and he gets banned, then he becomes the precedence, and so on, and so on. Eventually we get to the situation, where someone who doesn't like your football team gets banned, as he speaks badly of their fans.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,412 ✭✭✭✭salmocab


    Just to clarify, this pastor sounds like an idiot, and I would seriously judge anyone who went to listen to him speak.
    My concern is, that determining what equates to inspiring hate is not binary.
    I fear that one banning leads to another, and then another.
    If this guy becomes the precedence for who should be banned, and then next year, someone who is 99% as hateful tries to come to Ireland, and he gets banned, then he becomes the precedence, and so on, and so on. Eventually we get to the situation, where someone who doesn't like your football team gets banned, as he speaks badly of their fans.

    We’ve had one person banned in 20 years, I don’t think there is any danger of ministers going off banning supporters of Real Madrid on a whim.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,104 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    I've no interest in hearing what this Pastor has to say, but I fear that banning people from entering the country, because we they inspire hate is wrong.

    As previous posters have mentioned, banning him wont make much difference to people who believe in what he has to say. There is an internet out there, where I'm sure you can find all of his videos/speeches/etc.
    We should probably ban the internet, so that his speeches can't be accessed

    What we really should be focusing on, is why people listen to him, and follow his ideas. Lets figure that out, and see if we can help the people who might be filled with hate. Banning the pastor wont change these peoples thoughts, and has just brought further attention to him.
    I have never heard of this man before, and now I have.

    Why is incitement to hatred ok? Why do you think its ok to actually call for lgbt people to be murdered because they are lgbt?

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,412 ✭✭✭✭salmocab


    Why is incitement to hatred ok? Why do you think its ok to actually call for lgbt people to be murdered because they are lgbt?

    Ah In fairness he wasn’t making that point at all.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    salmocab and joeytheparrot I think this deserves a good debate. Something I dont have the time for at the moment.
    I hope you dont think I'm defending this pastor, or what he believes in. That's not the case at all.

    My fear is we go down a slippery slope of banning more and more people because they upset the majority, and we go down the route of over policing.

    If I have time this evening, I will return, and hopefully join in the debate again


  • Advertisement
Advertisement