Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Flightradar24 Thread Part III

12467192

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,227 ✭✭✭✭JCX BXC


    Growler!!! wrote: »
    As far as I can see the 2 new Stobart ATR's are the only flights to depart ORK this morning (FMJ and FMK).

    Can't find the FR902 has it left yet?

    Stobarts left from RWY25, no jet aircraft have departed due to crosswind limits of RWY16/35 being exceeded.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,980 ✭✭✭Growler!!!


    Carnacalla wrote: »
    Stobarts left from RWY25, no jet aircraft have departed due to crosswind limits of RWY16/35 being exceeded.

    Rwy 17?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,980 ✭✭✭Growler!!!


    Any idea what the RJ's X wind limit is? It's a type I never really looked at much?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,227 ✭✭✭✭JCX BXC


    Growler!!! wrote: »
    Rwy 17?

    Stuck in limbo between the new and old runway numbers :)

    Yes RWY17/35.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,980 ✭✭✭Growler!!!


    Carnacalla wrote: »
    Stuck in limbo between the new and old runway numbers :)

    Yes RWY17/35.

    Ha ha you can't use that excuse yet. Not until after April:D then we'll all be confused for a bit!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 581 ✭✭✭pepe the prawn


    Growler!!! wrote: »
    Any idea what the RJ's X wind limit is? It's a type I never really looked at much?

    The attached brochure (no I'm not thinking of buying one but may have to if there's no other jobs available for me in 10 months time :D) says 35kts being the maximum demonstrated crosswind but I have seen in an accident report that it's 33 knots, which may be operator specific..

    http://www.aviation-broker.com/uploads/media/RJ_Tech_data_at_a_glance__April_2004.pdf




    Accident report, RJ almost went off-roading...

    https://assets.digital.cabinet-office.gov.uk/media/5422fceced915d13710008fd/dft_avsafety_pdf_501191.pdf


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 581 ✭✭✭pepe the prawn


    For anyone who may be wondering where exactly a waypoint is when traffic is routed towards one, this is a handy website that gives the coordinates and a map of the any waypoint.

    http://opennav.com

    You can make a good guess-timate from looking at FR24 but this site may prove useful for some. Just be careful with the spelling, and if you can't exactly make it out, remember many waypoint names contain five letters, two of which are vowels, so even if you can't hear it properly, it's possible that if you do a quick mental comprehension and juggling of sorts you'll end up with the right answer. Others may contain a mixture of letters and numbers.

    (Of course, on the flight deck if unsure you will ask for the name to be spelt phonetically to avoid any confusion to avoid ending up somewhere you're not meant to be :pac:)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,980 ✭✭✭Growler!!!


    First wave Stobarts returning now to ORK. 1 go around and 1 landed. Pressures on!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,980 ✭✭✭Growler!!!


    The attached brochure (no I'm not thinking of buying one but may have to if there's no other jobs available for me in 10 months time :D) says 35kts being the maximum demonstrated crosswind but I have seen in an accident report that it's 33 knots, which may be operator specific..

    http://www.aviation-broker.com/uploads/media/RJ_Tech_data_at_a_glance__April_2004.pdf




    Accident report, RJ almost went off-roading...

    https://assets.digital.cabinet-office.gov.uk/media/5422fceced915d13710008fd/dft_avsafety_pdf_501191.pdf

    Nice brochure with lots of good info. The JAR fuel policy is nicely explained and should be stickied here for the journo info re " have they got enough fuel":D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25 doodahump


    bhx flew directly over runway and went around, aborted second attempt and going around again. Watched Manchester flight land - looked scary


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,980 ✭✭✭Growler!!!


    doodahump wrote: »
    bhx flew directly over runway and went around

    Text book explaination of a go around right there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,980 ✭✭✭Growler!!!


    doodahump wrote: »
    Watched Manchester flight land - looked scary

    Pics or it didn't happen:D:D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25 doodahump


    wow looks like its down but would not have liked to have been in that aeroplane!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25 doodahump


    Growler!!! wrote: »
    Text book explaination of a go around right there.

    dude I just happen to work in the airport business park and noticed the flight as I have a view of the ballygarvan approach here. no text book anything from me as im not an aviation buff,just noticed the thread on boards and as id seen the thing popped a comment in. apologies if im unqualified for this forum


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,980 ✭✭✭Growler!!!


    doodahump wrote: »
    dude I just happen to work in the airport business park and noticed the flight as I have a view of the ballygarvan approach here. no text book anything from me as im not an aviation buff,just noticed the thread on boards and as id seen the thing popped a comment in. apologies if im unqualified for this forum

    You entirely misunderstood! It was a compliment.

    For someone who is not an aviation buff you have described exactly what a go around is. You fly over the runway and climb away from the ground.

    No need for apologies either, everyone on here started with 0 posts and learned from the other posters. It's refreshing to get new blood on the forum.

    Can I suggest listening to Liveatc.com Cork feed and you'll hear the atc and pilot transmissions also.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 581 ✭✭✭pepe the prawn


    Vlm12lw from Luton to Waterford diverting to Dublin, didn't even attempt an approach, I wouldn't blame them, trying to land that thing in Waterford with this wind and sea spray would be a real underpants changer! :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 279 ✭✭paulhardman


    Growler!!! wrote: »
    Can't find the FR902 has it left yet?

    Looks like it went out to the runway, had a look, turned around and headed back to gate...

    LEbJjWG.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 581 ✭✭✭pepe the prawn


    EI822 looking to give departure a go at ORK now, currently holding on runway 25 nose into wind, waiting for their opportunity.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25 doodahump


    Ah sorry - I guess you cant detect tone from a board message lol- had just downloaded the flightradar app and when I saw the bhx abort I had to check it out - amazing stuff really. Will check out the ATC - amazing you can actually listen in also! I remember back in the 80's a cousin of mine had some sort of a scanner to listen into the pilots. Used to amaze me as a kid. chances of getting any work done are zero now lol

    Growler!!! wrote: »
    You entirely misunderstood! It was a compliment.

    For someone who is not an aviation buff you have described exactly what a go around is. You fly over the runway and climb away from the ground.

    No need for apologies either, everyone on here started with 0 posts and learned from the other posters. It's refreshing to get new blood on the forum.

    Can I suggest listening to Liveatc.com Cork feed and you'll hear the atc and pilot transmissions also.


  • Registered Users Posts: 194 ✭✭daelight


    RYR5554 appears diverting to LPL from Cardiff?

    OzM5hwP

    Looks like MAN .. but wonder why they didn't try BRS as much closer to destination, or even BHX?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,903 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    doodahump wrote: »
    Ah sorry - I guess you cant detect tone from a board message lol- had just downloaded the flightradar app and when I saw the bhx abort I had to check it out - amazing stuff really. Will check out the ATC - amazing you can actually listen in also! I remember back in the 80's a cousin of mine had some sort of a scanner to listen into the pilots. Used to amaze me as a kid. chances of getting any work done are zero now lol

    welcome to the forum. still have an old scanner stored away. no longer use it though as liveatc does the job. the new tech is fantastic. enjoy listening and learning


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,858 ✭✭✭Bigcheeze


    EI-EDY A330-300 just arriving back to Dublin now from maintenance in Bordeaux


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,227 ✭✭✭✭JCX BXC


    daelight wrote: »
    RYR5554 appears diverting to LPL from Cardiff?



    Looks like MAN .. but wonder why they didn't try BRS as much closer to destination, or even BHX?

    BRS has the same wind, BHX has an awkward runway angle. Pilots select their alternative before every takeoff, influenced by weather conditions, distance, runway, company preference and operational logistics to name a few. Why do ORK flights so often divert to SNN and not KIR?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 581 ✭✭✭pepe the prawn


    Carnacalla wrote: »
    Why do ORK flights so often divert to SNN and not KIR?

    I'd imagine that in SNN airlines have good ground crews and a good availability of alternative transport for pax etc. KIR, whilst having a perfectly long runway, ILS, and runway orientation favouring the prevailing winds in Ireland, has very limited ground operations for more than one commercial aircraft at a time. Also, KIR closes every night at 20:15, so if a flight does divert in there late in the evening, it's staying there until 0600 the following morning until the airport opens again.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,227 ✭✭✭✭JCX BXC


    I'd imagine that in SNN airlines have good ground crews and a good availability of alternative transport for pax etc. KIR, whilst having a perfectly long runway, ILS, and runway orientation favouring the prevailing winds in Ireland, has very limited ground operations for more than one commercial aircraft at a time. Also, KIR closes every night at 20:15, so if a flight does divert in there late in the evening, it's staying there until 0600 the following morning until the airport opens again.

    It was a rhetorical question.
    But you did fulfil it perfectly, all the reasons above are examples of why certain airports are picked as alternates, and others not.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,980 ✭✭✭Growler!!!


    Another thing worth considering during a weather event is that you are usually not the only aircraft affected. Therefore your ideal planned alternate can be full of already diverted aircraft and there will simply not be enough room for you.

    Time to check your second alternate!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,847 ✭✭✭✭Shannon757


    http://www.flightradar24.com/N212AZ/8c2464f
    Private ATR 42 into Shannon.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,847 ✭✭✭✭Shannon757


    http://www.flightradar24.com/N212AZ/8c2464f
    Private ATR 42 into Shannon.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 758 ✭✭✭Lustrum


    30kts max crosswind for take off for the whisper jet (RJ), 35 is the landing limit


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,504 ✭✭✭Jack1985


    Haven't seen a Lufty classic in a while :)
    http://www.flightradar24.com/DLH980/8c2a1c9


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,847 ✭✭✭✭Shannon757


    Can't be many left.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,227 ✭✭✭✭JCX BXC


    Shannon757 wrote: »
    Can't be many left.

    Modern aircraft, old livery, same as the Aer Lingus Retro plane :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,197 ✭✭✭arubex


    Cello Aviation B734 inbound to Dublin on a sub for Wow Air. Not many of those old birds still in passenger service around here.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 738 ✭✭✭AndyP


    Carnacalla wrote: »
    Modern aircraft, old livery, same as the Aer Lingus Retro plane :D

    It was a 737-300, not terribly modern


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,209 ✭✭✭✭Grandeeod


    AndyP wrote: »
    It was a 737-300, not terribly modern

    When was that one built?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 738 ✭✭✭AndyP


    Grandeeod wrote: »
    When was that one built?

    1991


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,847 ✭✭✭✭Shannon757


    AndyP wrote: »
    1991

    And the Aer Lingus retro jet was built in 2011 so not really the same.


  • Registered Users Posts: 194 ✭✭daelight


    Carnacalla wrote: »
    BRS has the same wind, BHX has an awkward runway angle. Pilots select their alternative before every takeoff, influenced by weather conditions, distance, runway, company preference and operational logistics to name a few. Why do ORK flights so often divert to SNN and not KIR?

    Was really hoping for an answer from the crew but thanks anyway!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,227 ✭✭✭✭JCX BXC


    daelight wrote: »
    Was really hoping for an answer from the crew but thanks anyway!

    The crew of that aircraft? Good luck!

    If you mean someone more qualified, maybe try the Ask an airline pilot thread? They will likely tell you something similar to what I said.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 581 ✭✭✭pepe the prawn


    Shannon757 wrote: »
    http://www.flightradar24.com/N212AZ/8c2464f
    Private ATR 42 into Shannon.

    For those among us who are tinfoil hat wearing curtain twitchers :pac:

    http://allnewspipeline.com/Strange_Surveillance_Plane_Over_MD_And_WV.php


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,504 ✭✭✭Jack1985


    daelight wrote: »
    Was really hoping for an answer from the crew but thanks anyway!

    There's a lot goes into this. For example signing in for work pilots will collect their OFP (Operating Flight Plan) before briefing.

    Detailed in the OFP is 4 alternates in terms of priority e.g. from a Cork flight today; C1 EINN (Shannon) C2 EIDW (Dublin) C3 EGAA (Belfast Aldergrove) C4 EGGD (Bristol). Detailed in these 4 alternates will be the proposed routing, the estimated time, the estimated fuel burn, estimated distance, the calculated flight level etc.

    Now it won't always be 4 alternates either, although where possible it usually will be. Included in the OFP will be en-route alternates on the actual proposed flight route, and as well as that forecast METARs for all these alternates, so the crew will discuss the weather, the proposed threats, and review the calculated fuel for the trip make adjustments where and if necessary prior to even leaving the crew room. Obviously this can also change again later down the line.

    A scenario for example with the Ryanair flight that diverted today from Cardiff to Manchester and not to Bristol (BRS) could be;

    1) Whats the latest wx, will we actually land if we divert to e.g. BRS
    2) Will their be a further delay in arrival to the proposed diversion point
    3) Are the resources their to look after us when we land (Even if the airline already flies to e.g. BRS, lack of stands and local crewing of ground handlers at the particular time can actually see diversions not suitable)

    The majority of crews into Cork will nearly 99% of the time go for Shannon; Kerry is nearly all the time unsuitable you have about 2 stands available, and restricted operational hours a nightmare for crew planners.

    Here's a good little reminder of how quick the preferred alternate can disappear very quickly, and how fuel planning during forecast bad weather is absolutely crucial. You'll hear in this how both Aer Lingus and Ryanair crews engage with their company to discuss the current preferred alternates taking into account points 1 to 3.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,356 ✭✭✭jimbis


    Must be nice to have your own 767.

    2qwg8bm.jpg


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 6,522 Mod ✭✭✭✭Irish Steve


    And before someone else comments, FR24 had the destination wrong, it landed in EWR (Newark) at 07:43

    Shore, if it was easy, everybody would be doin it.😁



  • Registered Users Posts: 73 ✭✭reforger


    BA 69 diverting to Dublin.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,227 ✭✭✭✭JCX BXC


    reforger wrote: »
    BA 69 diverting to Dublin.

    Hmm, unusual considering the usual diversion point is SNN.

    Anyone have any idea about the nature of the emergency?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,179 ✭✭✭✭fr336


    Carnacalla wrote: »
    Hmm, unusual considering the usual diversion point is SNN.

    Anyone have any idea about the nature of the emergency?

    They're not squawking an emergency callsign. Am keeping a listen out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,179 ✭✭✭✭fr336


    Medical emergency, were you the Ryanair who just asked the nature of the emergency for "planning purposes", Carnacalla? :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,817 ✭✭✭Comhrá


    According toTwitter it says "the needs of a passenger" I'm surmising it's medical?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,179 ✭✭✭✭fr336


    tippman1 wrote: »
    According toTwitter it says "the needs of a passenger" I'm surmising it's medical?

    Affirm.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,227 ✭✭✭✭JCX BXC


    On the android Flight radar app on my phone they have done this awful thing with the altitudes where they have tried to do a blended drop, so basically listing all the numbers between eg 2000ft and 1500ft rather than just the single drop, but its awful. Very inconsistent and quite annoying.

    Anyone else have any it?


  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement