Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

24567716

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,641 ✭✭✭Dog Botherer


    perhaps Farrell has mistaken having the required “big personality” with simply being big? at 6”8 he is taller than most other captains and could assuredly defeat them in single combat, if required.

    except Matera. everyone’s afraid of Matera.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,553 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Bazzo wrote: »
    He captained probably our most successful u20 side of all time.

    Do you think he looked suited to it in the last couple of games?


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I think there is something in the idea that the players just aren’t as good as the ones before them. Lots of 6or7/10 players to choose from but not many players who will challenge for Lions places.

    Also, why do we think Ryan is the next captain? He shown no outward signs of being a big personality. He’s a very good player, no doubt about that, but why captain? He seems like more of an introvert who will do his job all day long, but I haven’t seen any signs that he’s suited to captaincy.

    He has a history of captaincy at age grade and seems to have the respect of the squad. Considered measured.

    He's a guaranteed starter for the foreseeable future unless his form goes off a cliff completely

    He's Irish (not likely to appoint a project player captain or even one of the others with an Irish granny)

    More of the "lead-by-example" captains but so is someone say like Owen Farrell at England. Both are fairly quiet off-the-pitch.

    Who else is there that meets all those requirements?


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,098 ✭✭✭UAEguy2020


    I think there is something in the idea that the players just aren’t as good as the ones before them. Lots of 6or7/10 players to choose from but not many players who will challenge for Lions places.

    Also, why do we think Ryan is the next captain? He shown no outward signs of being a big personality. He’s a very good player, no doubt about that, but why captain? He seems like more of an introvert who will do his job all day long, but I haven’t seen any signs that he’s suited to captaincy.

    The ones we have got us to number one in the world not that long ago, it’s another convenient excuse to hide over the fact that they just aren’t playing well enough, I don’t know what happened but something must have happened between the autumn international and the start of the 6N because the Irish players aggression and intensity went down the gutter in such a short space of time, the exact players who would get into a world 15 wouldn’t even get close within afew months.

    He’s more of a leader in what he does than what he says, his issue I think is he is too ambitious for his own good at times, too many times when he makes the captains call he wants to go to touch with a penalty instead of taking the kick at goal, was a big turning point in the France and England match.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 458 ✭✭stellenbosch


    glasso wrote: »
    He has a history of captaincy at age grade and seems to have the respect of the squad. Considered measured.

    He's a guaranteed starter for the foreseeable future unless his form goes off a cliff completely

    He's Irish (not likely to appoint a project player captain or even one of the others with an Irish granny)

    More of the "lead-by-example" captains but so is someone say like Owen Farrell at England. Both are fairly quiet off-the-pitch.

    Who else is there that meets all those requirements?

    Ringrose is the best candidate for Captain for me


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,626 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Also, why do we think Ryan is the next captain? He shown no outward signs of being a big personality. He’s a very good player, no doubt about that, but why captain? He seems like more of an introvert who will do his job all day long, but I haven’t seen any signs that he’s suited to captaincy.

    I think the same could've been said of Drico when he was first appointed captain. (Continuing the comparisons, they're the last 2 players to get capped for Ireland before getting capped for their province). Fully expect him to be the long-term captain following Sexton.

    If you have your doubts, who would be prefer to see get the captaincy?


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    UAEguy2020 wrote: »
    The ones we have got us to number one in the world not that long ago, it’s another convenient excuse to hide over the fact that they just aren’t playing well enough, I don’t know what happened but something must have happened between the autumn international and the start of the 6N because the Irish players aggression and intensity went down the gutter in such a short space of time, the exact players who would get into a world 15 wouldn’t even get close within afew months.

    this is late 2020

    no point in being stuck in early 2019



    old players got older

    a couple retired

    some new ones came in

    one coach gone, an assistant coach with zero head-coach experience now in charge and assistants looking poor. head coach needs help

    uncertainty in the camp now about contracts to be renewed

    other nations have gotten better while Ireland have gone backwards


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,553 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    aloooof wrote: »
    I think the same could've been said of Drico when he was first appointed captain. (Continuing the comparisons, they're the last 2 players to get capped for Ireland before getting capped for their province). Fully expect him to be the long-term captain following Sexton.

    If you have your doubts, who would be prefer to see get the captaincy?

    I’m not suggesting anyone. I’m questioning the assumption that he’s the “natural” next captain.

    I think it shows a big problem as there are very few players who are nailed on to start. At the moment (apart from
    Front rows) there is Ryan, Stander and sexton. The rest are not guaranteed to start, sexton is too old for any medium term plan and Stander is a foreigner.

    Ringrose is a good choice right now but he was rightly dropped ahead of the World Cup and played his way back into great form since then. He’s be a good choice for captain right now. But we can’t have the situs with Best where the captain was playing poorly but they painted themselves into a corner by always playing him up to that point - because he’s the captain so he has to play.

    I think they should have a different approach to captaincy. For example have a captaincy group and nominate a player each week to be the captain on the pitch and take the media duties. Being a good player doesn’t mean they easily handle the pressure of the media work. Under 20s captain isn’t really the same as senior international in that regard.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,805 ✭✭✭accensi0n


    Next you'll be telling me the 10 doesn't have to be the kicker. :rolleyes: :pac:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,223 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    Watching 'Against the Head' on RTE. They're highlighting the lack of vision in the backs. The centres especially come out of it badly. Farrell and McCloskey ignored overlaps in favour of kicking in behind. Which is bad enough to begin with it, but compounded by the fact they were poorly executed kicks too.

    It looks like we tried to incorporate the lessons we learned from the England game against a side that defends nothing like them. We knew we didn't kick enough a week ago so kicked too often, ignoring the better attacking opportunities our wings had.


  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭✭ Everleigh Freezing Oasis


    Clegg wrote: »
    Watching 'Against the Head' on RTE. They're highlighting the lack of vision in the backs. The centres especially come out of it badly. Farrell and McCloskey ignored overlaps in favour of kicking in behind. Which is bad enough to begin with it, but compounded by the fact they were poorly executed kicks too.

    It looks like we tried to incorporate the lessons we learned from the England game against a side that defends nothing like them. We knew we didn't kick enough a week ago so kicked too often, ignoring the better attacking opportunities our wings had.

    I've far more problem with us just shovelling poor quality passes along the backline without fixing any defenders. It's so easy to defend.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,978 ✭✭✭✭irishbucsfan


    All of that is bad, but even worse, I’ve just seen a photo of Nuciforas hair and it’s so bad it’s turned me into an Ulster fan


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,552 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Clegg wrote: »
    Watching 'Against the Head' on RTE. They're highlighting the lack of vision in the backs. The centres especially come out of it badly. Farrell and McCloskey ignored overlaps in favour of kicking in behind. Which is bad enough to begin with it, but compounded by the fact they were poorly executed kicks too.

    It looks like we tried to incorporate the lessons we learned from the England game against a side that defends nothing like them. We knew we didn't kick enough a week ago so kicked too often, ignoring the better attacking opportunities our wings had.

    It might just be me, but I feel Irish teams are terrible at exploiting overlaps. We never seem to manufacture the space that NZ or other good attacking teams do.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,553 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    accensi0n wrote: »
    Next you'll be telling me the 10 doesn't have to be the kicker. :rolleyes: :pac:

    No, next I’ll be telling you that hooker doesn’t have to throw into the lineout.

    One funeral at a time, eh?


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,098 ✭✭✭UAEguy2020


    Clegg wrote: »
    Watching 'Against the Head' on RTE. They're highlighting the lack of vision in the backs. The centres especially come out of it badly. Farrell and McCloskey ignored overlaps in favour of kicking in behind. Which is bad enough to begin with it, but compounded by the fact they were poorly executed kicks too.

    It looks like we tried to incorporate the lessons we learned from the England game against a side that defends nothing like them. We knew we didn't kick enough a week ago so kicked too often, ignoring the better attacking opportunities our wings had.

    Which again is why we need that second set of eyes like Ringrose.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,098 ✭✭✭UAEguy2020


    I've far more problem with us just shovelling poor quality passes along the backline without fixing any defenders. It's so easy to defend.

    It’s like we are trying to get the ball to the wing as soon as possible without achieving the main aim of the attack, to draw players, and by the time it gets to the end of the line they just boot it because there is no space as no defenders were drawn...Leinster do it right,Munster,Ulster,Connacht can do it yet for Ireland they forget everything, this is the pure basics of back play, it shouldn’t have to be coached into them...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,616 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    Maybe the players are not top quality? I have no idea what the problem is. But, we look kind of headless.
    I thought Keenan was our best player from Saturday. None of the forwards impressed me.
    Anyway... on to Scotland


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,978 ✭✭✭✭irishbucsfan


    UAEguy2020 wrote: »
    Which again is why we need that second set of eyes like Ringrose.

    I'm not sure Ringrose creates all that many line breaks himself and I don't think he turns up at first receiver often enough to solve any of those problems. I think the answer is likely a different type of player at 15, purely because we don't produce that many 2 5/8th style midfielders who are up to standard.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,098 ✭✭✭UAEguy2020


    I'm not sure Ringrose creates all that many line breaks himself and I don't think he turns up at first receiver often enough to solve any of those problems. I think the answer is likely a different type of player at 15, purely because we don't produce that many 2 5/8th style midfielders who are up to standard.

    It’s not necessarily the line break it’s just him not being a Bosch player and having excellent feet, it gives defenses something else to think about. One player I definitely would like to see in there at 15 if he brings his form to Europe and the interpros is Jimmy O’Brien, feel he is exactly what we are crying out for.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,098 ✭✭✭UAEguy2020


    Dubinusa wrote: »
    Maybe the players are not top quality? I have no idea what the problem is. But, we look kind of headless.
    I thought Keenan was our best player from Saturday. None of the forwards impressed me.
    Anyway... on to Scotland

    We’re playing Georgia...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,967 ✭✭✭✭The Lost Sheep


    UAEguy2020 wrote: »
    We’re playing Georgia...
    we're not. they play fiji


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,098 ✭✭✭UAEguy2020


    we're not. they play fiji

    .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,814 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    I'm not sure Ringrose creates all that many line breaks himself and I don't think he turns up at first receiver often enough to solve any of those problems. I think the answer is likely a different type of player at 15, purely because we don't produce that many 2 5/8th style midfielders who are up to standard.

    Mike Lowry may be the player you're looking for. I suspect Ulster will stick Stockdale at 11 and Lowry at 15 for Europe, but we will see.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,223 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    BOD wants Frawley in the squad. Think it's too soon for that myself, but he's played well at 12 over the last month. Could be the distributing option we're looking for.

    Need to see him play in bigger games to get the full picture.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    I thought Matt Gallagher might have been a potential bolter in 2021 but he's gone off tonight with a serious looking arm/shoulder injury.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,498 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    bilston wrote: »
    Mike Lowry may be the player you're looking for. I suspect Ulster will stick Stockdale at 11 and Lowry at 15 for Europe, but we will see.

    I've said before, I was sceptical of him getting a crack at international level because of his size, but he's been in fantastic form, and has done it at inter-pro and European level. If you're going by form, if you want a skilled, distributing FB, he should get a crack. Ahead of JOB or anyone else.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,066 ✭✭✭Richie_Rich89


    I've said before, I was sceptical of him getting a crack at international level because of his size, but he's been in fantastic form, and has done it at inter-pro and European level. If you're going by form, if you want a skilled, distributing FB, he should get a crack. Ahead of JOB or anyone else.

    Haven't seen too much of Ulster lately, Has Lowry been that good? JOB's been pretty tidy. I'd like to see him get a shot. The ex-7s players have good accuracy of execution of skills and technique.

    The creative axis of the centres and fullback needs something new anyway. Hopefully Stewart Moore can improve his defence up to a good level cos he's already a brilliant attacker. He seems to read and understand the game so well.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,498 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    Haven't seen too much of Ulster lately, Has Lowry been that good? JOB's been pretty tidy. I'd like to see him get a shot. The ex-7s players have good accuracy of execution of skills and technique.

    The creative axis of the centres and fullback needs something new anyway. Hopefully Stewart Moore can improve his defence up to a good level cos he's already a brilliant attacker. He seems to read and understand the game so well.

    Yeah. Lowry has been genuinely excellent. JOB's been very good, but as a 10, the way Lowry plays, brings others in and turns defence into attack is a key strength for Ulster. He has also has some amazing dancing feet on him.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,626 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Clegg wrote: »
    BOD wants Frawley in the squad. Think it's too soon for that myself, but he's played well at 12 over the last month. Could be the distributing option we're looking for.

    Need to see him play in bigger games to get the full picture.

    Was this from Off The Ball, Clegg? I don’t think he was calling for his inclusion in the squad, tbh. Was it not more about his development with Leinster this season and potentially being an option in he more medium to long term?


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,558 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    The players vs coach vs systems debate always rears it’s head when we are doing badly. What is the best way to figure out the relative contribution of each to our current malaise? I’m not convinced our players are that great. Could the Leinster management get more out of them? *Runs away quickly*


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,952 ✭✭✭TRC10


    Any update on Henshaw? He's been our best player in 2020 and we badly need his distribution and footwork in midfield.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,616 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    Our performance was very flat this past weekend. I thought we were going to put up a big score, but fair play to Georgia. They competed very well. The try they scored was brilliant.
    Shane Daly getting in was very well deserved. He's another lad who I think will be pushing his way into the reckoning.
    If EOS gets capped this week, that will be 11 new caps this autumn, iirc. That's great to see. Although we really have not played well. Overall though, the make up of the squad is going to look different over the next few months/ year.
    Understandably, a lot of lads were injured and will probably come back in when healthy, but the dynamics of the play and the squad are shifting. I think Farrell has done ok thus far. By no means are we playing to our potential and the drop in form is frustrating but, given time, I believe we could be a very good side.
    The players need to step up and play more physically imo. Georgia made us look sloppy at times and I think we might have underestimated them. I still think that the loose head issue could be very damning. If nobody can step in and replace Healy... we are fecked. The man has played all theses matches this month. He's getting flogged. Bealham, is not the answer either. It could be Wycherly in Munster in time or maybe EOS will get a shot and take his opportunity. I didn't realize the Kilcoyne is 32. I thought he was 29 or 30. He probably is not the answer either. He's going to be 35 for the next world cup.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,287 ✭✭✭Niallof9


    Farrell has a simple out here. He needs to be bolder. If he had against Georgia people cut him slack. He can go down the excuse route and talk of building. The reason he can't is because he picked a hugely experienced spine against Georgia. A loss to Scotland and its already entering last chance saloon. To take such a punt on the coach but not selections is typically Irish. I'd cut our losses now if i was the IRFU. Injuries, long camp, covid and now the contract situation all taking their toll. But so too is an inexpeienced head coach and three awful ly overrated assistants. The contract situation was always a danger. In its very nature the central contract system and its pecking order, often unjust, must be destabilising much of the time when things go wrong.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,429 ✭✭✭nigeldaniel


    I am afraid I do not agree with the IRFU and their 'players must stay in Ireland if they wish to play for Ireland' idea. I think it is going to backfire on Rugby as a whole. I understand the idea of having strong clubs but would the provinces weaken all that much if 3 or 4 or so players left every now and again. Take injuries for an example. Look what happened to Munster in the last 2 years. Take out a few key players and they still found replacements. I just think there is too much fear about what will happen to clubs if a number of players leave. It's not as though we would see busloads heading overseas.
    Just my two pennies worth on the subject.

    Dan.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    I understand the idea of having strong clubs but would the provinces weaken all that much if 3 or 4 or so players left every now and again.

    Yes they would and there would be a lot more consternation about that than about one or two players electing to make themselves ineligible for Ireland.

    The only time the policy is ever brought up us when Ireland are struggling. There was hardly a peep about it in 2018.


  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭✭ Everleigh Freezing Oasis


    Ardillaun wrote: »
    The players vs coach vs systems debate always rears it’s head when we are doing badly. What is the best way to figure out the relative contribution of each to our current malaise? I’m not convinced our players are that great. Could the Leinster management get more out of them? *Runs away quickly*

    Do you reckon the side the Leinster side that was meant to play Scarlets at the weekend, prepped/coached/etc as usual by the Leinster coaching staff, would have done any worse against Georgia than Ireland did? I certainly don't.


  • Subscribers Posts: 41,837 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    I am afraid I do not agree with the IRFU and their 'players must stay in Ireland if they wish to play for Ireland' idea. I think it is going to backfire on Rugby as a whole. I understand the idea of having strong clubs but would the provinces weaken all that much if 3 or 4 or so players left every now and again. Take injuries for an example. Look what happened to Munster in the last 2 years. Take out a few key players and they still found replacements. I just think there is too much fear about what will happen to clubs if a number of players leave. It's not as though we would see busloads heading overseas.
    Just my two pennies worth on the subject.

    3 or 4 players leave all the time.

    Off the top of my head (with a little Google help) , within the last 10 years, Conor gilsenan, noel Reid, Jack regan, Conan o donnell, oli jager, Bryan Byrne, Niall anett, Brett herron, callum Black, paddy Jackson, Sean o brien, Ian Madigan, Ian keatley, Ian Nagle, mick kearney, Jerry Sexton, Michael heaney, brendan macken, Peter lydon, David Johnson, Ryan foley, des merry, Conor Joyce, Mark Flanagan, tadgh mcelroy, James lennon, paddy Ryan, Rory parata, Sean scanlan, Jordan coughlan, oisin Heffernan, Shane buckley , Shane o leary, gearoid lyons, Craig teanor, donnacha Ryan, Simon Zebo, paddy butler, Dave Ryan, Denis coulson, Duncan casey, Frank Ryan, Stuart olding, Jamie hagan, Dan touhy, eamon Sheridan, Steve mcmahon, Justin fitzpatrick, Dylan fawsitt, cathal Marsh, James Rochford, paddy Ryan, Ross deacon, will Leonard, Mark o keeffe, Marcus Walsh, Jamie dever, Charlie Connolly, Conor Murphy, Sam Windsor, all left the Irish provincal systems to play abroad


    I think that's about 60 ish


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,287 ✭✭✭Niallof9


    well i think the picture is becoming clearer now and it would make more sense as to why we are seeing such tripe at the moment. there has to be real fears now from the players. With that many out of contract, there will be blood. In no way should some of these guys continue on the top tier bracket. And at this stage the bluff of moving abroad should be called. I was never a fan of the ringfenced contracts, nor the ban on players abroad. An Aussie style cap system and more IRFU top up deals to certain provincial contracts would possibly be a fix. Cause either way if say Murray on his near 600k is given a paycut or an extension on that contract, it will be a negative. You'll have either an unhappy player or a player and an organisation living in denial. the chickens are finally coming home to roost on all this and i think people who argued the central contract thing and the players abroad thing are only a positive, and calling out anybody who saids otherwise as a wum, crazy, non conforming is finally being proven wrong. 90 players out of contract? we're in **** creek. Covid will just make the blind see. Central contracts for 3 years for a tiny minority was a mugs game when all is taken into consideration.

    It was of its time, it worked. Now they need to come up with something else. Its all funded by the IRFU i don't see why they can't move to in house provincial deals with nobody egged as a special star. All contracted provincially, with some paid more if they perform and are of that elite status. More performance related clauses like Liverpool apparently do(https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/liverpool-fc-change-player-contracts-3325019). But we don;t have to make a song and dance about how 12 players out of about 200 are the best of the best, and nearly certain of their spots and better sponsorship/opportunities due to big contracts splashed across the papers. The repeated failures in the World Cup should really take away some of the players bargaining chips, and now you can reset with a largely youngish squad. Players who have over 50 caps could be in consideration if they move abroad or on a case by case basis. There's always been an issue here in the way unlike football or other team sports we can't sell or release some of these guys easily. Therefore perfomances from individuals can be all over the shop when theres no real disincentive to not perform. And we can't afford to have players like O'Brien and Zebo not playing for Ireland. we aren't good enough to be in that position.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 458 ✭✭stellenbosch


    Niallof9 wrote: »
    well i think the picture is becoming clearer now and it would make more sense as to why we are seeing such tripe at the moment. there has to be real fears now from the players. With that many out of contract, there will be blood. In no way should some of these guys continue on the top tier bracket. And at this stage the bluff of moving abroad should be called. I was never a fan of the ringfenced contracts, nor the ban on players abroad. An Aussie style cap system and more IRFU top up deals to certain provincial contracts would possibly be a fix. Cause either way if say Murray on his near 600k is given a paycut or an extension on that contract, it will be a negative. You'll have either an unhappy player or a player and an organisation living in denial. the chickens are finally coming home to roost on all this and i think people who argued the central contract thing and the players abroad thing are only a positive, and calling out anybody who saids otherwise as a wum, crazy, non conforming is finally being proven wrong. 90 players out of contract? we're in **** creek. Covid will just make the blind see. Central contracts for 3 years for a tiny minority was a mugs game when all is taken into consideration.

    It was of its time, it worked. Now they need to come up with something else. Its all funded by the IRFU i don't see why they can't move to in house provincial deals with nobody egged as a special star. All contracted provincially, with some paid more if they perform. More performance related clauses like Liverpool apparently do(https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/liverpool-fc-change-player-contracts-3325019). The repeated failures in the World Cup should really take away some of the players bargaining chips, and now you can reset with a largely youngish squad. Players who have over 50 caps could be in consideration if they move abroad.

    Very very valid comments there


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,231 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    sydthebeat wrote: »
    3 or 4 players leave all the time.

    Off the top of my head (with a little Google help) , within the last 10 years, Conor gilsenan, noel Reid, Jack regan, Conan o donnell, oli jager, Bryan Byrne, Niall anett, Brett herron, callum Black, paddy Jackson, Sean o brien, Ian Madigan, Ian keatley, Ian Nagle, mick kearney, Jerry Sexton, Michael heaney, brendan macken, Peter lydon, David Johnson, Ryan foley, des merry, Conor Joyce, Mark Flanagan, tadgh mcelroy, James lennon, paddy Ryan, Rory parata, Sean scanlan, Jordan coughlan, oisin Heffernan, Shane buckley , Shane o leary, gearoid lyons, Craig teanor, donnacha Ryan, Simon Zebo, paddy butler, Dave Ryan, Denis coulson, Duncan casey, Frank Ryan, Stuart olding, Jamie hagan, Dan touhy, eamon Sheridan, Steve mcmahon, Justin fitzpatrick, Dylan fawsitt, cathal Marsh, James Rochford, paddy Ryan, Ross deacon, will Leonard, Mark o keeffe, Marcus Walsh, Jamie dever, Charlie Connolly, Conor Murphy, Sam Windsor, all left the Irish provincal systems to play abroad


    I think that's about 60 ish

    In fairness, very few of them are relevant to the national team, the vast majority left because they had to if they wanted to play pro rugby. TBH, there's a few in there I'd never even heard of.

    The only people who really left while still wanted here have been Johnny Sexton (you forgot him), D Ryan, Madigan and Zebo - and really only Sexton was crucial, D Ryan not far behind but Madigan and Zebo were not huge losses. The likes of O'Brien and Paul O'Connell were winding down and looking for a final payday.

    The big losers of an exodus abroad would be the provinces. The national team might have to swallow its pride and start picking the exiles but the provinces would be screwed.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Niallof9 wrote: »
    well i think the picture is becoming clearer now and it would make more sense as to why we are seeing such tripe at the moment. there has to be real fears now from the players. With that many out of contract, there will be blood. In no way should some of these guys continue on the top tier bracket. And at this stage the bluff of moving abroad should be called. I was never a fan of the ringfenced contracts, nor the ban on players abroad. An Aussie style cap system and more IRFU top up deals to certain provincial contracts would possibly be a fix. Cause either way if say Murray on his near 600k is given a paycut or an extension on that contract, it will be a negative. You'll have either an unhappy player or a player and an organisation living in denial. the chickens are finally coming home to roost on all this and i think people who argued the central contract thing and the players abroad thing are only a positive, and calling out anybody who saids otherwise as a wum, crazy, non conforming is finally being proven wrong. 90 players out of contract? we're in **** creek. Covid will just make the blind see. Central contracts for 3 years for a tiny minority was a mugs game when all is taken into consideration.

    It was of its time, it worked. Now they need to come up with something else. Its all funded by the IRFU i don't see why they can't move to in house provincial deals with nobody egged as a special star. All contracted provincially, with some paid more if they perform and are of that elite status. More performance related clauses like Liverpool apparently do(https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/liverpool-fc-change-player-contracts-3325019). But we don;t have to make a song and dance about how 12 players out of about 200 are the best of the best, and nearly certain of their spots and better sponsorship/opportunities due to big contracts. The repeated failures in the World Cup should really take away some of the players bargaining chips, and now you can reset with a largely youngish squad. Players who have over 50 caps could be in consideration if they move abroad. There's always been an issue here in the way unlike football or other team sports we can't sell or release some of these guys easily. Therefore perfomances from individuals can be all over the shop when theres no real disincentive to not perform.

    When are you going to get it into your head that centrally contracted players are not guaranteed their spot.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,287 ✭✭✭Niallof9


    When are you going to get it into your head that centrally contracted players are not guaranteed their spot.

    when will you get into your head that its a highly likely scenario. McGrath had Healy coming back and was waning himself, and Toner was in freefall. The latter is a real example of how central deals don't work. Even if its not a selection thing I have no evidence, and your rebuttal probably using these two is flimsy at best , how is that good for anybody? The player himself, the squad, the finances, the competing player. Its not and we've been living off the idea that we're the smartest guys in the room when it comes to this stuff. We ain't and Nuciforas comments highlight it. Even without Covid this would still be the scenario. Earls, Sexton, POM,MUrray would all still face huge cuts like SOB. An unhappy squad group, a pecking order being reshuffled. Central deals whatever the selection issue, should be retired. And when i say selection i'm talking about the squad selections. And if player A in squad on 2 year central deal gets dropped but is on 400k and is just holding bags, but player B is on 200k and now starting but has to wait another 2 years, to me this is a daft system. There's a tonne of other stuff probably involved with rights and sponsorship and exposure and match bonuses. we have no idea.


  • Subscribers Posts: 41,837 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Best players get centrally contracted

    Best players more likely to be selected in squad

    Conspiracy theory abounds......


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,287 ✭✭✭Niallof9


    sydthebeat wrote: »
    Best players get centrally contracted

    Best players more likely to be selected in squad

    Conspiracy theory abounds......

    Yeah thats what i said great reply. I suppose what else do i expect from people who throw personal insults around. There's no argument to be had that the best players get deals.

    Do the best players perform consistently? going by Japan last year, the highest level, the answer has to be a no. what part of that do you not understand? SOB is the example of it in reality. We will have to see what happens with these deals. But its a busted flush if these lads get central deals.

    I am arguing to do away with central deals and the like. make of that what you will but try to argue the point rather than with cheap replies.


  • Registered Users Posts: 195 ✭✭EachSmallChime


    In fairness, very few of them are relevant to the national team, the vast majority left because they had to if they wanted to play pro rugby. TBH, there's a few in there I'd never even heard of.

    The only people who really left while still wanted here have been Johnny Sexton (you forgot him), D Ryan, Madigan and Zebo - and really only Sexton was crucial, D Ryan not far behind but Madigan and Zebo were not huge losses. The likes of O'Brien and Paul O'Connell were winding down and looking for a final payday.

    The big losers of an exodus abroad would be the provinces. The national team might have to swallow its pride and start picking the exiles but the provinces would be screwed.

    Which in turn means Thomond and the RDS stop selling out because of poor Euro performances, ticket prices for international games drops and there's less money to spread around the provinces promoting the game. This in turn means, there's less interest in rugby and you could potentially have a smaller pool to pick from.

    Sounds a bit dramatic but there are long term knock on effects to weakening provinces. Rugby's popularity in Ireland shouldn't be taken for granted.


  • Advertisement
  • Subscribers Posts: 41,837 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    In fairness, very few of them are relevant to the national team, the vast majority left because they had to if they wanted to play pro rugby. TBH, there's a few in there I'd never even heard of.

    The only people who really left while still wanted here have been Johnny Sexton (you forgot him), D Ryan, Madigan and Zebo - and really only Sexton was crucial, D Ryan not far behind but Madigan and Zebo were not huge losses. The likes of O'Brien and Paul O'Connell were winding down and looking for a final payday.

    The big losers of an exodus abroad would be the provinces. The national team might have to swallow its pride and start picking the exiles but the provinces would be screwed.

    in fairness, relevance to the national team was not at all what was being discussed.

    i replied to
    I understand the idea of having strong clubs but would the provinces weaken all that much if 3 or 4 or so players left every now and again. Take injuries for an example. Look what happened to Munster in the last 2 years. Take out a few key players and they still found replacements. I just think there is too much fear about what will happen to clubs if a number of players leave. It's not as though we would see busloads heading overseas.

    busloads have already headed abroad from the provinces over the last 10 years. it happens.

    Is it within the IRFUs interest to hold onto as many top class players as they can, on this island, of course it is.


  • Subscribers Posts: 41,837 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Niallof9 wrote: »
    Yeah thats what i said great reply. I suppose what else do i expect from people who throw personal insults around.

    sorry, cant hear you over the hyperbole... :rolleyes::rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 678 ✭✭✭Solutionking


    Honestly, the biggest change required in the next few years is for the fans to accept that the current batch of players might not be as good as their predecessors.

    I think the biggest shock will be when people figure out how great a coach Schmidt was. The treatment that man got when he left was a disgrace.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,626 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Niallof9 wrote: »
    the chickens are finally coming home to roost on all this and i think people who argued the central contract thing and the players abroad thing are only a positive, and calling out anybody who saids otherwise as a wum, crazy, non conforming is finally being proven wrong.

    I don't understand why you can't make your points in a reasoned manner instead of leaning towards inflammatory / emotive stuff like this. It seems pretty unnecessary. Anyways, I'm gonna leave it there...


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,287 ✭✭✭Niallof9


    sydthebeat wrote: »
    sorry, cant hear you over the hyperbole... :rolleyes::rolleyes:

    Funny i can barely hear you given how many times you've been proven wrong down the years. Its a surprise you're still going on here. but yeah i know 2018 was a great year so lets just live on that.

    I mean if simply questioning the system is hyperbole then Irish rugby is absolutely goosed. Jesus Christ. Are you in denial or something? Nucifora has said 90 contracts are up. The big contracts cost about 2 million. This is a perfect chance to discuss it. There's no point cutting these lads and just replacing them with say Connors or whomever. Either you have 30 central deals or none imo.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement