Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Grace Park Wood Development, Drumcondra

  • 19-05-2017 3:30pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 14


    Hi,

    Did anybody else bought there home in the last weekend's launch of Grace Park Wood Development, Drumcondra.

    How are you finding the development?

    I booked a Ash Type 3 bed house, it seems a little small for the price and doesn't seems to have enough storage space.

    How are you finding the finish of the house?

    Thanks
    Timelapse


«13456

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 5 Househunter30


    Hi,

    I too have booking deposit on a house in Grace Park Woods. Savilles confirmed today that there will be social housing in the development as referenced in a Sunday Times article yesterday. We were not aware of this until yesterday.

    Best of luck


  • Registered Users Posts: 32 IronSteve


    Hi,

    I too have booking deposit on a house in Grace Park Woods. Savilles confirmed today that there will be social housing in the development as referenced in a Sunday Times article yesterday. We were not aware of this until yesterday.

    Best of luck
    What percentage social housing? Would assume 10% is standard in all new developments?


  • Registered Users Posts: 5 Househunter30


    Yes, 10 percent social housing apparently is now standard for any new development that was granted planning after September 2015. It seems that Grace Park woods was granted planning in October 2015.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,609 ✭✭✭dubrov


    Hi,

    I too have booking deposit on a house in Grace Park Woods. Savilles confirmed today that there will be social housing in the development as referenced in a Sunday Times article yesterday. We were not aware of this until yesterday.

    Best of luck

    Strange as I was told the day before they went on sale that there would be no social housing due to the timing of the planning application.

    Surely they must have known at that stage.


  • Registered Users Posts: 32 IronSteve


    They definitely knew.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5 Househunter30


    dubrov wrote: »
    Strange as I was told the day before they went on sale that there would be no social housing due to the timing of the planning application.

    Surely they must have known at that stage.

    Sunday Times article by Valerie Flynn yesterday indicated the developer was in negotiations with the council to finalise costs and agreements for social housing. I rang Savilles today and they confirmed this was the case. They couldn't tell me where in the development the social houses would be yet?!


  • Registered Users Posts: 6 ohcrap


    I've a deposit down too- bit worried- surely they must have known and do know the amount now? Will we know before we get to contract stage?

    Is there a link to the article? Thanks


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,420 ✭✭✭✭athtrasna


    10% is the legal requirement and social housing these days tends to be scattered around a development rather than a block of homes, for many reasons.


  • Registered Users Posts: 286 ✭✭Here we go


    I know 10% is the legal amount but how exactly does that work. You build an estate of 700 k houses you have to build 10% equal quality houses.Or can they build lower cost houses in the estate. If it's a mixed value estate 3/4/5 beds are the 10% taken from the 3 beds or mixed. I'd have no issue with it in the long term it's creating better communities and stops putting all people who need in the one area creating gettos. I would be worried of the councils buying up extra. Iv heard of them buying up to more then 50% in some areas because of the houseing crises.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,782 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    Yes, 10 percent social housing apparently is now standard for any new development that was granted planning after September 2015. It seems that Grace Park woods was granted planning in October 2015.

    10% now, it used to be 20%. So social housing inclusion was always planned for this estate. Phase approaching completion, with the following phases to commence straight away.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,782 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    Here we go wrote: »
    I know 10% is the legal amount but how exactly does that work. You build an estate of 700 k houses you have to build 10% equal quality houses.Or can they build lower cost houses in the estate. If it's a mixed value estate 3/4/5 beds are the 10% taken from the 3 beds or mixed. I'd have no issue with it in the long term it's creating better communities and stops putting all people who need in the one area creating gettos. I would be worried of the councils buying up extra. Iv heard of them buying up to more then 50% in some areas because of the houseing crises.

    A broad mixture of 2, 3 and 4 bed units.
    Scattered throughout the development.


  • Registered Users Posts: 14 Timelapse


    Hi Househunter30,

    Do you have the link to that article from Sunday Times?

    Thanks!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,609 ✭✭✭dubrov


    Here you go:

    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/builders-sell-homes-despite-lack-of-deals-over-social-housing-qrmp3fls7

    If you register without subscription, you can view 2 articles per week on the Times website


  • Registered Users Posts: 14 Timelapse


    Hi,

    Is any body been offered Attic Conversion by the builder for there house in GPW?

    Thanks!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,609 ✭✭✭dubrov


    Estate agent on site said that the roof would be too low to do an attic conversion. I think it was specifically in relation to the Elm.
    I thought that was strange given the planning suggests it is possible.


  • Registered Users Posts: 14 Timelapse


    dubrov wrote: »
    Estate agent on site said that the roof would be too low to do an attic conversion. I think it was specifically in relation to the Elm.
    I thought that was strange given the planning suggests it is possible.

    I thought that the height for Ash is not enough for Attic but Elm, Hazel & other are fine....Which reference you have that suggest that Attic is possible??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,609 ✭✭✭dubrov


    Timelapse wrote: »
    I thought that the height for Ash is not enough for Attic but Elm, Hazel & other are fine....Which reference you have that suggest that Attic is possible??

    You can find it in the full planning application here
    http://www.dublincity.ie/swiftlg/apas/run/WPHAPPDETAIL.DisplayUrl?theApnID=2991/15&SearchID=2


  • Registered Users Posts: 14 Timelapse


    Hi Dubrov,

    Yes I can see the planning permission is already approved for 3 Bed Deep Type (Elm) house for Attic Conversion and Extension. That includes putting in Dormer Window in front.

    For Hazel there is no planning permission taken but elevation on Hazel (9.643) is more than Elm(9.131) from plans and seems to follow the same deep type house structure.

    Wonder why the the estate agent then said that Elm cannot be converted??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,609 ✭✭✭dubrov


    The estate agents may have made a mistake. I would check directly with them.

    I also don't understand why they wouldn't offer the attic conversion (even at a high price) as an option on any of the houses.
    I would be cheaper to do during the initial build rather than trying to convert afterwards.


  • Registered Users Posts: 14 Timelapse


    Also there is planning permission granted for Extension at back of Ash Type houses.

    But I haven't heard a single things about it!!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 14 Timelapse


    dubrov wrote: »
    The estate agents may have made a mistake. I would check directly with them.

    I also don't understand why they wouldn't offer the attic conversion (even at a high price) as an option on any of the houses.
    I would be cheaper to do during the initial build rather than trying to convert afterwards.

    Hi Dubrov,

    If they don't offer Attic conversion on Hazel or Elm type house would the ceiling of 1st floor be made strong enough to support Attic??

    Cause if the ceiling is not made strong enough then it would be a problem?

    As the houses are timber frame you can't add steel beams to support Attic Conversion??

    Thanks


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,609 ✭✭✭dubrov


    Timelapse wrote: »
    Hi Dubrov,

    If they don't offer Attic conversion on Hazel or Elm type house would the ceiling of 1st floor be made strong enough to support Attic??

    Cause if the ceiling is not made strong enough then it would be a problem?

    As the houses are timber frame you can't add steel beams to support Attic Conversion??

    Thanks

    I have no idea I am afraid. I asked before the sale date about extensions and attic conversions and was told the family room extension was only available on the Elm to make it the same as the Blackthorn. Attic conversions were not being offered by the builder.

    I had a nose on the Saturday and was told the attic could not have been converted on the Elm due to the roof height.

    I had already decided not to buy before the initial viewing on the Friday as although the 3 beds looked nice on the plans, they were a bit too small for us. An attic conversion and family room extension would probably have been sufficient space-wise internally but it would have decimated the already tiny garden.

    I think the 3 beds will all still close fairly quickly though.


  • Registered Users Posts: 14 Timelapse


    dubrov wrote: »
    I have no idea I am afraid. I asked before the sale date about extensions and attic conversions and was told the family room extension was only available on the Elm to make it the same as the Blackthorn. Attic conversions were not being offered by the builder.

    I had a nose on the Saturday and was told the attic could not have been converted on the Elm due to the roof height.

    I had already decided not to buy before the initial viewing on the Friday as although the 3 beds looked nice on the plans, they were a bit too small for us. An attic conversion and family room extension would probably have been sufficient space-wise internally but it would have decimated the already tiny garden.

    I think the 3 beds will all still close fairly quickly though.

    So you haven't booked anyone from the Prelaunch?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,609 ✭✭✭dubrov


    Yes. I didn't book any.

    I knew the prices and viewed the plans so knew what I'd be getting beforehand


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,782 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    dubrov wrote: »
    The estate agents may have made a mistake. I would check directly with them.

    I also don't understand why they wouldn't offer the attic conversion (even at a high price) as an option on any of the houses.
    I would be cheaper to do during the initial build rather than trying to convert afterwards.

    It's all got to do with plot ratios, number of bed spaces and private open spaces. If they convert the attic then they add a double. We space to that dwelling which means that the private open space for that dwelling increases which in turn means the occupation level of the estate increases which in turn means the public open spaces in the development increases.

    Everything has a knock on effect.
    Then you have the development standards for the city which ensures a mix of 2,3 and 4 bed houses. If every house in the estate had the extra bedroom the average house price increases and in turn excludes many buyers from the scheme.
    This ensures a mixed development.

    Then you have the building regulations for a 3 storey dwelling which are strictor than a 2 storey and bottom line here is that it increases the cost to the developer.


  • Registered Users Posts: 21 Fada70


    I was also told that attics cannot be modified (trussed roof structure, etc.). 
    Any update re social housing location? 
    Is anyone going for Help to Buy rebate? The developer is listed as qualifying constructor.
    Scary news re emerging housing bubble last week...


  • Registered Users Posts: 6 BCunn


    Fada70 wrote: »
    I was also told that attics cannot be modified (trussed roof structure, etc.). 
    Any update re social housing location? 
    Is anyone going for Help to Buy rebate? The developer is listed as qualifying constructor.
    Scary news re emerging housing bubble last week...

    Hi, Deposit down on an Elm and saw this thread so thought I would join.
    Having asked the EA I was told there was no attic conversions on offer, that's not to say the attic cannot be converted, but that it isn't on offer as part of the sale (in the same way the kitchen extension is). I think this is because the trussed roofs are a cheaper method (prefabbed and stuck on the house) for development, but are more complex to convert into a living space as a result.
    I would be interested in an attic conversion in the future so had also come across similar threads while researching, cant link them :(


  • Registered Users Posts: 21 Fada70


    You are one of the six lucky ones :). 
    Elms were taken, so I put a deposit on a Hazel hoping for a future attic conversion - the planning permission docs indicate sufficient roof height. The kitchen looks smaller every time I view it :(. 
    Worried a bit that the 5-beds are not selling...


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,348 ✭✭✭GhostyMcGhost


    Fada70 wrote: »
    Worried a bit that the 5-beds are not selling...

    At 735k a pop I wouldn't be surprised


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5 Househunter30


    Have been told by council that 2 apartment blocks will consist of social housing and not the houses.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,825 ✭✭✭LirW


    As far as I'm aware it's the same in the Kilternan development: They have 2 apartment blocks in the front that are for social housing purposes.
    10% of every new development will be bought by the council for social housing, Grace Park is no exception.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 434 ✭✭AsianDub


    In Grace Park would it be the entire block(s) as was Hazelbrook Square in Churchtown?


  • Registered Users Posts: 364 ✭✭LincolnHawk


    LirW wrote: »
    10% of every new development will be bought by the council for social housing, Grace Park is no exception.
    The mandatory 10% isn't bought by the council is it?
    The developer has to provide it right? So the working people pay for it really, its factored into the price of your house


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,825 ✭✭✭LirW


    Honestly I'm not 100% sure but no matter how it is, in every new development in Dublin there must be social housing units provided, at least 10% of the stock.


  • Registered Users Posts: 70 ✭✭sphinx501


    Any development granted planning after Sept 2015 over 10 units must provide 10% social housing for use of the local council. Before this date the developer had the option to buy out of providing social housing.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,782 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    The mandatory 10% isn't bought by the council is it?
    The developer has to provide it right? So the working people pay for it really, its factored into the price of your house

    Yes, they are bought by the council for cost price plus a very low margin of profit for the developer.

    I've been involved in the hand over of part 5 housing allocations but at that time it was 20% of the units. Now it's only 10%.

    So no. Not factored into the working people, they are paid,for by the council.


  • Registered Users Posts: 364 ✭✭LincolnHawk


    Lol, of course that still pushes up the price for the working Joe. Having to sell 10% close to cost means the developer will need a bigger margin on the rest. Back to economics school.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,782 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    Lol, of course that still pushes up the price for the working Joe. Having to sell 10% close to cost means the developer will need a bigger margin on the rest. Back to economics school.

    LOL
    deal with it. Social integration will be part of this development, and every other development. Just because they are priced as if they are clontarf doesn't mean social units won't be present. This is still a large development, density maxed out to development plan standards and built for a profit by the builder.
    I've been in every house in Grace Park, before, during and on completion so I know which one is buy (if any).

    Your comment about the developer have to hand over the units for free was incorrect. I addressed that false statement, that is all. Now back to charm school for you.


  • Registered Users Posts: 21 Fada70


    I've been house-hunting for 3 years, went thru numerous bidding and "bidding" wars, spent years searching about the area/building/locality. Now, I paid the deposit (knowing there were no ghost bidders, rising damp, non-existing sinking funds, fire-traps, strange cracks in the walls, etc.). I know the house is overvalued for cca 200K (I am still sourcing funds and negotiating with banks) and that Richmond Rd is a far cry from the sea views of Clontarf. I am 100% pro social integration, a bit worried that the allocated units are not distributed (we all know the history of isolated pockets of social housing)... I am too aware of the OECD opinion, problems in the construction industry, warnings we read in the papers... A further year of renting while waiting for the house does not help....
    The people who put deposits on 3-beds and whom I met at the viewings subsequently seemed to share my experiences/worries.  
    I know nothing about the building quality of the houses. If you do kceire, please share.


  • Registered Users Posts: 364 ✭✭LincolnHawk


    kceire wrote: »
    Your comment about the developer have to hand over the units for free was incorrect. I addressed that false statement, that is all. Now back to charm school for you.
    That's why I didn't state it as fact but asked the question. It was an incorrect assumption I'll admit.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,100 ✭✭✭Browney7


    How do the council decide who on the list gets to live in the "nicer" stock? Political connections or just those who make a tonne of noise? Let's face it, a social house here versus some of the less salubrious parts of town are not one of the same.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10 Carey8123


    I signed up for a house at the launch - I wasn't considering an attic conversion but had noted the option for an extension to the rear.  As for social housing, I was told by Savills that the allocation hadn't been determined but they said none of the houses in the first phase were to be allocated to that purpose.  I agree with the earlier comment that a spread through the development would be good - it would be annoying to have paid the 35k extra for end of terrace near to the apartment block and now find that they are all to be allocated in that way.
    Separately, for anyone else who has bought, what has your experience been with the Developer/Savills?  Any questions/requests I made are being either ignored (manhole cover in the backgarden?) or dismissed (changing to a shower in the main bathroom).  I can appreciate all builders want to minimise changes and it is a sellers market but the utter inflexibility is still amazing.  I have friends in other countries (equally hot prices) buying new houses/apartments and the builders are willing to make some changes for free (location of power supply, tv point, etc.) and others for additional cost (additional tiling / light fixtures).  For any other buyers, what has been your experience with the developer/agent?


  • Registered Users Posts: 21 Fada70


    I asked for a few changes, offering to cover full cost, all requests refused point-blank.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 837 ✭✭✭CFC007


    I've a bought house from the same builder in a different development and absolutely no modifications were allowed. Pretty annoying all the same. Still waiting for the house to be finished so can't comment on the quality of finish.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,782 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    Fada70 wrote: »
    I asked for a few changes, offering to cover full cost, all requests refused point-blank.
    CFC007 wrote: »
    I've a bought house from the same builder in a different development and absolutely no modifications were allowed. Pretty annoying all the same. Still waiting for the house to be finished so can't comment on the quality of finish.

    things have tightened up with the new Building Control Amendment Regulations. If the builder makes changes, the Assigned certifier doesn't sign off as compliant.

    Changes can be made by the home owner after hand over is the only option. Its pretty much like this on most sites now a days.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5 Househunter30


    I too asked about putting a shower in main bathroom and was told no. I assumed there'd be some way round this but to be paying a large amount for a house with a shower head only in bathroom seems crazy. Have asked Savills several times to provide information about social housing and they have yet to get back to me. Don't like the idea of social housing lumped together in 2 apartment blocks either!!!


  • Registered Users Posts: 10 Carey8123


    @kceire: Would the building regulations also mean that they could not leave the bathroom un-tiled / unfinished?  Bad enough having to organise someone to instal a shower, I really don't want to have to pay to rip out a bath which has just been installed.  Separately, I was told that with the seals on a high energy efficient house, adding plugs and moving TV points afterwards would (without alot of work) breach the seals and reduce the rating.  If that is the case, the developer's refusal is particularly egregious. 

    @ Househunter30: I agree re the shower head.  You can't even use the bath as a shower given the central location of the taps and the sloped sides on the bath.


  • Registered Users Posts: 21 Fada70


    Does anyone know anything about the imposed management company? Any indication re the management fees? I viewed a house in a similar development, the mgm fee was 1980 Euro/year.


  • Registered Users Posts: 21 Fada70


    Does anyone know anything about the imposed management company? Any indication re the management fees? I viewed a house in a similar development, the mgm fee was 1980 Euro/year.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,609 ✭✭✭dubrov


    Fada70 wrote:
    Does anyone know anything about the imposed management company? Any indication re the management fees? I viewed a house in a similar development, the mgm fee was 1980 Euro/year.


    Savills estimate was 450/550/650 for a 3/4/5 bed house.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement