Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Green Bay Packers Thread

1646567697093

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,731 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Yeah no need to draft for the future when you have a declining old te

    I didn’t say that, dude, I said we have a BBTE who I think can still do some business.

    Our record in drafting TEs is not stellar.

    Mark Chmura and JMike being the exceptions.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,768 ✭✭✭raze_them_all_


    I didn’t say that, dude, I said we have a BBTE who I think can still do some business.

    Our record in drafting TEs is not stellar.

    Mark Chmura and JMike being the exceptions.

    Jmiich was awesome it was so disappointing whe. He was injured. Though I remember a lot of frustration with him as his hands weren't the best


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,768 ✭✭✭raze_them_all_


    Well d. K. Metcalf had himself a combine.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,658 ✭✭✭✭OldMrBrennan83


    Could easily be a workout warrior. Doesn't look like a hugely talented football player on videos.

    That said, NFL teams never care about the latter so he's going top 10.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,768 ✭✭✭raze_them_all_


    Could easily be a workout warrior. Doesn't look like a hugely talented football player on videos.

    That said, NFL teams never care about the latter so he's going top 10.

    He's a freak athlete, he has had a lot of injuries would be my concern


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,731 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Ooooh..... some big moolah being spent by the Packers.

    What’s the opinion of you folk out there........


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,658 ✭✭✭✭OldMrBrennan83


    Ooooh..... some big moolah being spent by the Packers.

    What’s the opinion of you folk out there........

    Fairly average players but all bar the lineman is still a big upgrade. Way overspent on the face of it but then again when every team is overspending then it doesn't count.

    Needed to do something anyway so it's nice to see a different strategy for once. The old one hasn't worked for a long time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,731 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Fairly average players but all bar the lineman is still a big upgrade. Way overspent on the face of it but then again when every team is overspending then it doesn't count.

    Needed to do something anyway so it's nice to see a different strategy for once. The old one hasn't worked for a long time.

    Yeah... we’ll wait for the fallout though.

    I’d wait for the ‘experts’ to give us a steer on this lot.

    Interesting.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,074 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Some details here:

    http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000001022114/article/packers-add-trio-of-highpriced-free-agent-defenders
    NFL Network Insider Ian Rapoport reported Tuesday morning that the Packers are expected to sign former Baltimore Ravens edge rusher Za'Darius Smith and ex-Bears safety Adrian Amos, per sources informed of the deals. Amos' deal, Rapoport added, will be for four years worth $37 million, $21 million coming in the first two seasons. Smith's contract comes in the form of four years for $66 million with $34.5 million across the initial two seasons.

    Green Bay is also expected to get a deal done with former Washington Redskins edge rusher Preston Smith, per Rapoport. RapSheet adds Smith's deal is for four years with a base value of $52 million.

    And the spending wasn't done there, as the Packers added a piece the the offensive puzzle with Rapoport reporting they will sign former Broncos offensive lineman Billy Turner, a versatile get who can play guard or tackle. Turner's deal is for four years with a maximum value of $29.5 million.

    Its very exciting news I think. A nice change from previous conservative years. Should make the draft a lot more interesting now too, that some of the "needs" are less pressing and some of the "wants" can be focused on.

    Can anyone speculate as to how much cap space this leaves the team with?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,731 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Blut2 wrote: »
    Some details here:

    http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000001022114/article/packers-add-trio-of-highpriced-free-agent-defenders



    Its very exciting news I think. A nice change from previous conservative years. Should make the draft a lot more interesting now too, that some of the "needs" are less pressing and some of the "wants" can be focused on.

    Can anyone speculate as to how much cap space this leaves the team with?

    Too early to say until the fine details of the contract come out but the word is that the signings were good value at good spots for the Packers.

    Dude on Packers Pod. Reckons about $5 million which could be increased with cuts.
    :D
    Jimmy G... Hi


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,658 ✭✭✭✭OldMrBrennan83


    He has to go for the money he's on.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,731 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    He has to go for the money he's on.

    Yes or take a good cut.... Really frustrates me when I see other TEs on other teams coming up good on usually vital third downs whereas the Packers recently anyway have struggled big time to keep the O on the field.

    Still think he wants to prove himself in GB as injuries blighted his first season.

    Jays we had a stud in Jarrod Cooke and we got rid of him after a year.

    With relatively good QBs on the other NFC N division teams, we can't let them stand around in the pocket, have a cigarette , and toss one untouched 30 yards downfield.

    The two Smiths should at least ensure we have pressure there.

    The secret next season will probably the ability to keep the O on the field and for the D to get it back quickly if it is lost.

    As Mike used to say..."fundamental" but it wasn't happening no matter how "fundamental" is obviously was.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,127 ✭✭✭cosatron


    With Jake Ryan going to jax Thus closing the book on Ted Thompson's Failed 2015 draft. A bad draft really can make a fcuk of things

    1. Damarious Randall, CB (30th overall pick)

    2. Quinten Rollins, CB (62)

    3. Ty Montgomery, WR (94)

    4. Jake Ryan, LB (129)

    5. Brett Hundley, QB (147)

    6. Aaron Ripkowski, FB, (206)

    6. Christian Ringo, DE (210)

    6. Kennard Backman, TE (213)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    That was some bad draft alright, though Randall seems to have found his old self in Cleveland somewhat (still seems a bit of a locker room cancer, mind). Montgomery was a bit meh but a handy utility player we never used right who seemed to lose his attitude too with some others at the end of the McCarthy reign. Hundley we almost got the pick back on from Seattle (6th rather than 5th if I recall?) but him being on the roster that long and being that underprepared was inexcusable. Ripkowski I felt got a bit of a raw deal, FB is a peripheral position but I thought he was quite handy. Jake Ryan is going to have a solid career for another 4-6 years I reckon - poor in pass coverage, lacks blitz abilities, but is very good against the run for goalline and 3rd/4th and short situations. I think his injury last year is a little underplayed in our going from being good against the run to woeful last year (though it lies largely on the OLBs, so hopefully the Smiths fix that up a bit this season).

    So definitely a poor draft for selections, but also poorly managed in terms of how they were used and evaluated for progression. Let's hope for much better next month!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,768 ✭✭✭raze_them_all_


    Billy86 wrote: »
    That was some bad draft alright, though Randall seems to have found his old self in Cleveland somewhat (still seems a bit of a locker room cancer, mind). Montgomery was a bit meh but a handy utility player we never used right who seemed to lose his attitude too with some others at the end of the McCarthy reign. Hundley we almost got the pick back on from Seattle (6th rather than 5th if I recall?) but him being on the roster that long and being that underprepared was inexcusable. Ripkowski I felt got a bit of a raw deal, FB is a peripheral position but I thought he was quite handy. Jake Ryan is going to have a solid career for another 4-6 years I reckon - poor in pass coverage, lacks blitz abilities, but is very good against the run for goalline and 3rd/4th and short situations. I think his injury last year is a little underplayed in our going from being good against the run to woeful last year (though it lies largely on the OLBs, so hopefully the Smiths fix that up a bit this season).

    So definitely a poor draft for selections, but also poorly managed in terms of how they were used and evaluated for progression. Let's hope for much better next month!
    Would agree about ripkowski but you can literally make any big bodied rb and fb these days. They just need less talent ha


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,768 ✭✭✭raze_them_all_


    Clay Matthews off to the rams after a decade in gb and all time leading sack leader for us. Personally outside of being a great locker room guy I feel like he has been working off his name the last few seasons and not his work on the field, good luck to him out there though


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,731 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Yes, despite falls in performance sad to see Randall Cobb and Clay leave the Packers.

    Looks like #12 #69 and #75 would be the senior men now in terms of Packer experience.

    End of an era methinks.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    I wouldn't have minded either back on the cheap - we kind of lack a real slot guy that I am aware of, and Cobb on a $5mn or less 'prove it' deal could have been useful there. Matthews, though way way past his best, would have been amazing to have as the primary backup across the LB corps.

    Cobb was had a $5mn so probably could have been brought back, though Matthews' deal is worth $16.75mn over two years... it's likely top heavy as the Rams if I recall still have a good bit of cap space for this coming season, but it is way more than he is worth at this point.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,074 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Totally agree on both points. Its obviously sad to see Matthews go, but at that price the Rams are welcome to him.

    Shame Cobb couldn't have been kept for under $5mn. I'm sure he would have preferred to avoid to move so would have taken slightly under that to stay.

    I wonder if there are plans afoot to get Nelson back to fulfill that role at an even lower cost.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,658 ✭✭✭✭OldMrBrennan83


    It's the NFL and they haven't performed in a while so time for a change.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,096 ✭✭✭Jofspring


    Does Matthews going free up some money to bring someone else in or would the signings so far be eating that up?


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,127 ✭✭✭cosatron


    both Matthews and cobb were free agents so no cap saving. At present we are 13m under the cap and I say Crosby could be getting cut as his 4.5m against the cap, which is allot for a kicker. Delighted to see Matthews and cobb get contracts else where as there production was will down and they weren't healthy. It looks like we will be going olb, o-line, wr, ilb and safety in draft.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    I would also not at all be surprised to see Tramon Williams cut to save another $4.8mn. Great locker room guy and all, but he looked past it last year and turned 36 a few days ago; that's a good bit of money to be spending on a no.5 or no.6 CB/backup safety.

    Beyond that, any other cuts are really hard to identify. Jimmy Graham was decent last year but nowhere near worth the $12mn he is getting this season, but even if we draft Fant or Hockenson I think we still need Jimmy to be safe (esp with so many young pass catchers - I love their upside, but right now Geronimo Allison is basically our third most experienced 'skill position' player, not including Marcedes Lewis who will be doing well to get into double digits this year for passes caught.

    I also see we retained Marcedes Lewis on a cheap one year deal. Very happy with that, he is one of the peripheral players I really wanted to see us keep since he is still a quality blocker, and assuming we do draft a TE, having them learn to block from one of the best blocking TE's of the last 10-20 years, and learning in the passing game from one of the top receiving TE's of the last 10-20 years, with well over 20 years experience betwen them, would be a huge benefit.

    Lance Kendricks has also been released outright, which is certainly a good thing. I thought he could be a great fit at TE2/3 having had 30-40-50 catch seasons before, but the guy just isn't an NFL level player beyond an emergency stopgap for injuries during the year.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,127 ✭✭✭cosatron


    allot of talk about drafting a tightend with one of our first round picks, I would prefer if we drafted an OLB and right tackle with those picks. I don't think tightend is worth a first round pick.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,768 ✭✭✭raze_them_all_


    cosatron wrote: »
    allot of talk about drafting a tightend with one of our first round picks, I would prefer if we drafted an OLB and right tackle with those picks. I don't think tightend is worth a first round pick.

    gronk, kelce,kittle would beg to differ


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,127 ✭✭✭cosatron


    gronk, kelce,kittle would beg to differ

    gronk was a second round pick, Kelce was a third round pick and kittle was a fifth round pick.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,768 ✭✭✭raze_them_all_


    cosatron wrote: »
    gronk was a second round pick, Kelce was a third round pick and kittle was a fifth round pick.

    pie.face.me.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    cosatron wrote: »
    gronk was a second round pick, Kelce was a third round pick and kittle was a fifth round pick.

    This is true, but we're any taken in the first they would still have proven excellent value. A truly game changing TE I would argue is even bigger than a game changing WR, and plenty of those get taken first. The hit rate on first round TEs isn't great though, if I recall. That is a concern.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,658 ✭✭✭✭OldMrBrennan83


    Bubba Franks was a first rounder too, so we all know how much luck is involved in the draft.

    Really unhappy to see them shell out that much to keep a passenger like Graham around for next year though, regardless of who they draft.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,731 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Bubba Franks was a first rounder too, so we all know how much luck is involved in the draft.

    Really unhappy to see them shell out that much to keep a passenger like Graham around for next year though, regardless of who they draft.

    #88 Bubba Franks was a top class blocking TE. A fcuking stud.

    I would hold fire on JimmyG.... jeez man we have had so many no name TEs working for us, since Bubba, at least Jimmy is a name.;)

    Clutching at straws:cool:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,731 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Uhmmmm lot of chaff blowing around the organisation recently.

    Most unusual for the Packers....seems a Rogers McCarthy rift has been going back a while.

    Jermichael 88 and Greg Jennings seem to have ‘piled on’ with heavy criticism on #12.

    Alleging Rogers ‘froze out’ receivers who followed McCarthys play call instead of his,at the LOS.

    Packers organisation need to get a handle on this schidt quanto rapido.

    Big schidt going on which is unusual.

    All not good.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,127 ✭✭✭cosatron


    the article doesn't reflect well on the packers at all. Rodgers is no angel and to be honest seems a bit of a prick but his our prick. My biggest worry is, will lefluer be able to manage him.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,731 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    cosatron wrote: »
    the article doesn't reflect well on the packers at all. Rodgers is no angel and to be honest seems a bit of a prick but his our prick. My biggest worry is, will lefluer be able to manage him.

    Yes, that’s a problem.

    Rogers needs to ‘connect’ with the team.Like if your receivers don’t like you and think you a a prick earning huge money on their effort...... only one outcome.

    La Fleur needs to establish his authority early, if he doesn’t, it’s bad news.

    Hopefully the shake up will have a good outcome, I’m hopeful of a good season but any crap amongst the team and and players will not enhance their prospects.


  • Registered Users Posts: 920 ✭✭✭Ron Burgundy II




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,731 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar



    If half of this shíte is true then Gutekunst and Murphy and LaFleur need to get a handle on it pronto.

    Packers always were able to avoid these kind of situations,and their results proved the value of a united team.

    Let’s hope that this crud is sorted as soon as possible.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,768 ✭✭✭raze_them_all_


    The 12th pick am not impressed with at all, 21.....grand but hardly worth moving up for imo


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,658 ✭✭✭✭OldMrBrennan83


    They can't keep ignoring the offense. Taylor and Ford will probably be gone by 44 but they'd at least need to add to the receivers at that stage.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,768 ✭✭✭raze_them_all_


    They can't keep ignoring the offense. Taylor and Ford will probably be gone by 44 but they'd at least need to add to the receivers at that stage.
    This is where you sack up as the gm. Should of taken the te from iowa at 7 should of traded up. Balls out and take metclaffe or however its spelt


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,731 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Ssssteady up now lads.... I would never think I know better than an experienced GM and a battery of advisors around him.

    Let’s calm down a bit...... and consider that there will be O men later on.

    I wouldn’t panic just now, let’s wait till it all pans out.

    We don’t want any more Tony Mandarichs........


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,768 ✭✭✭raze_them_all_


    Ssssteady up now lads.... I would never think I know better than an experienced GM and a battery of advisors around him.

    Let’s calm down a bit...... and consider that there will be O men later on.

    I wouldn’t panic just now, let’s wait till it all pans out.

    We don’t want any more Tony Mandarichs........
    The problem is the last 7 years all the offensive players have been later rounds except I think Eddie lacey. Outside of him I genuinely can't think of our last first round offensive player.

    Just checked. 2010+2011 both offensive tackles


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,731 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    The problem is the last 7 years all the offensive players have been later rounds except I think Eddie lacey. Outside of him I genuinely can't think of our last first round offensive player.

    Just checked. 2010+2011 both offensive tackles

    Maybe that’s because it was the defense was the problem

    I’m happy with the Offense,add a few astute picks and it’s a good one.

    I think the Packers are depending on MVS,ESB,J’Mon, Jake Kumero to take the step add Geronimo and expect #17 to be the stud he is to continue.

    OLine at RT and RG is dependable on injury, but should be able to be bolstered by later picks.

    I think this strategy is good, make Lambeau a fortress as it was, and if you win there, it will be hard earned.

    I’m well aware the Packers are an ‘offensive team’ but we need steel in the D too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,768 ✭✭✭raze_them_all_


    Maybe that’s because it was the defense was the problem

    I’m happy with the Offense,add a few astute picks and it’s a good one.

    I think the Packers are depending on MVS,ESB,J’Mon, Jake Kumero to take the step add Geronimo and expect #17 to be the stud he is to continue.

    OLine at RT and RG is dependable on injury, but should be able to be bolstered by later picks.

    I think this strategy is good, make Lambeau a fortress as it was, and if you win there, it will be hard earned.

    I’m well aware the Packers are an ‘offensive team’ but we need steel in the D too.
    8 years of defensive first round picks. If that can't sort a teams defence the team really needs to look at their scouts/draft guidelines


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    8 years of defensive first round picks. If that can't sort a teams defence the team really needs to look at their scouts/draft guidelines
    The problem there is, when your opponents best weapon and your defenses biggest weakness is often your own defensive coordinator, you can literally draft a secondary full of all pros and watch them look average... which is exactly what happened to us. I'm not saying the talent was perfect by any means, but it didn't really matter who the talent was when having our plays called by a dinosaur where the opposing QB knew better than our own players what they were going to be doing on any given play (kind of inevitable when you give a different formation/look to seemingly every play).


    I'm... pretty happy with the draft so far.

    First of all, I was very happy to see us not take a WR in the first two rounds - initially I pretty much stopped reading as soon as a mock had us taking one early, but for the last month or so just about every mock seems to have had this, which is irritatingly lazy. Davante Adams is a top 8 WR in the league easily (half a yard more pace and he would be up there with Julio and Antonio Brown imo, and Brown is the best WR I've ever seen - above Megatron, Fitz, Owens and Moss even). Beyond that, Allison is a serviceable no. 2 and nothing more... but MVS and St. Brown showed quite a lot last year, and I'm more than happy for those three to fight it out for the other spot. Kumerow is also in there to add some competition, and I think he could be a late bloomer who turns into a 40-60 catch, 13-15 yard per catch, kind of guy. J'Mon Moore showed absolutely nothing, but that's not too uncommon for rookie WRs. To me, the boundaries are solid... but we really have nobody in the slot, unless one of the aformentioned guys goes there, which brings me to my next point. LaFleur also seems to prefer to run the ball more, which might mean more two-TE sets and less slot guys... and hopefully, less running the ball 6 times in our opening drive of each half, and 4-5 times for the entire remainder of the game.

    We didn't need to trade up to get Savage - he almost definitely would have still been there at no. 30, while Adderley was there until 5-6 picks from the end of the 2nd round, while Deionte Thompson is still there at the start of round 4. That said, I guess it points to Pettine knowing exactly what he wanted and Gutekunst being willing to go to bat for him - having someone with such incredible range in the backfield should free up Pettine do mess around with all 11 other guys on the defense (maybe 10; Kevin King seems more of a pure coverage guy from what I've seen), which is what his system is all about.

    It's because of that that I get the Gary pick, though I'm still quite split on it and wonder how much we were banking on Hockenson or Oliver falling. Guys who struggled to produce in college in my guesstimation bust far more often than they boom in the NFL, but the guy is an absolute physical freak and can play DE or OLB, which will allow us to shift formations, looks and play calls at the LOS even more, and having picked up the two Smiths, plus having guys like Martinez, Fackrell, Daniels and Clark (and hopefully Mo Wilk on another cheap 1yr deal!) adding to the sack count, means that Gary should not have much pressure on him this year and can develop.

    It stung a little watching some of the other OL men coming off the board right before our second rounder, and Jawaan Taylor in particular was of interest to me (fight for a G spot this year, take over for Bulaga/Spriggs at RT next year kind of thing), but the talk on Jenkins is pretty positive and he gives us an option to replace Linsley or Taylor moving forward (or Turner if he doesn't work out at RG). I am actually a little higher on our O-line than most (we also got Cole Madison reporting back a few days ago, and he was seen as one of the bigger steals of all of last year's draft, plus Turner of course) and think we might have used it for other areas, but good value on good linemen should never be seen as a bad thing.

    And we picked up a TE, which is good. Hock or Fant would have been great but each were ridiculously expensive, and while I don't know a tonne about Sternberger I've seen his style compared to Zach Ertz - a good athlete but not great, fluid but not explosive, shifty and smart to catch passes in the seams, and a potentially great guy to 'keep the chains moving'. He's going ot be learning pass catching techniques from one of the very best pass catching TEs over the last decade, and blocking from one of the very best blocking TEs, of the last decade too, which is a major plus.

    I really think the two fourth rounders we gave up for Savage are a bit of a missed opportunity for us to go pick up a quality slot guy, and possibly a 3rd RB as well, or even another DB. On that note though, I'm also relieved we have not yet taken a RB as we had far, far bigger needs and Aaron Jones has the potential to be a top 5-8 RB in the entire league. I just feel like this is an area of the draft where we typically draft among the very best in the league, and it's a shame to be missing out on it. We have a fifth, two sixths and a 7th rounder left... imo beyond round 4 it really becomes much more about BPA, but I ideally would like to see a RB, slot WR, and DB amongst them.

    Christ, we're mid-way through round 4 now and I'm wondering if it's worth seeing if we can do a small trade to snag Thompson at S to go with Amos, Savage, and Jones (also playing some ILB) and Tramon (also playing CB further down the depth chart).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,723 ✭✭✭MightyMandarin


    Very happy with the draft overall tbh. Going by some analysts, we had one of the best drafts overall and I care to agree really. Gary @ 12 was interesting but I see the value from what he adds to the pass rush overall, rather than individually. Brett Kollman reckoned he's like a Clowney in that his individual stats aren't WOW, but his versatility means offenses have no idea where he can line up which makes them fearful and allows them to focus on him more than other players instead. According to him, Gary's a large part of the reason Devin Bush was so good at LB and having seen some film, I can see why tbh. He just makes the space to allow someone like Bush get to the QB, and since he can line up anywhere pretty much, OC's will watch him closely. Considering the players who were left at 12, I think Gary was a solid pick.

    Savage @ 21 was also solid and really gets that DB group sorted tbh. Considering it's been a mess the past few years, it looks so much better now and I really think Savage compliments Amos back there. He's easily one of the top DB's in this class and I like to think this Defense really has to deliver now that it's received so much investment in the draft and FA.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,658 ✭✭✭✭OldMrBrennan83




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,339 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    Just saw the news. An absolute legend of the game.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,512 ✭✭✭baby and crumble




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,731 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar



    Got too expensive..


  • Registered Users Posts: 950 ✭✭✭nasty_crash


    saving 8.3 mill against the cap is too much not to let him go! there obviously happen with the group there with lowry, clark, adams, keke and the lbs they have....

    Surprising it happened so quick.... does this mean that we are targetting other positions now? WR maybe.... couldnt make a bid for Dez right?


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,672 ✭✭✭ScummyMan


    saving 8.3 mill against the cap is too much not to let him go! there obviously happen with the group there with lowry, clark, adams, keke and the lbs they have....

    Surprising it happened so quick.... does this mean that we are targetting other positions now? WR maybe.... couldnt make a bid for Dez right?

    I could see a move for Mason Foster or Michael Crabtree


  • Advertisement
Advertisement