Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Ireland at the 41st World Chess Olympiad Tromsø 2014

1356714

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 278 ✭✭EnPassant


    cdeb wrote: »
    Poormina goes badly wrong in time trouble; those rooks are nasty, and the bishop is cutting off the only escape square.

    So close to an overall draw against a very strong Mongolian team.

    Poormina was actually winning at about move 33-34.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 7,265 Mod ✭✭✭✭cdeb


    I know. I meant we were close to a 2-2 team draw. Diana missed a (tricky) tactic to pick up a piece earlier on in her game.


  • Registered Users Posts: 411 ✭✭brianhere


    If the clocks are right Colm only has about 2.30 minutes left while his opponent has 1 hour and 14 and its a difficult position so we are staring at a possible whitewash here!

    http://www.orwellianireland.com



  • Registered Users Posts: 411 ✭✭brianhere


    he is moving within the increment, 30 seconds, and i think it will come down to two pawns versus a pawn and a knight so not over yet..

    http://www.orwellianireland.com



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,034 ✭✭✭Ficheall


    Seems Colm's opponent has mate in 23! Wonder will he spot it...


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 7,265 Mod ✭✭✭✭cdeb


    Computer calls mate in 23 now.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 7,265 Mod ✭✭✭✭cdeb


    WTF?

    Mate in 23
    +10
    Mate in 22
    Mate in 22
    LEVEL!!
    +77
    +8

    All in successive half-moves

    This is a weird game. But it's great to see titled players' games fluctuate wildly. Makes me feel better about my own. :)


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 7,265 Mod ✭✭✭✭cdeb


    Can anyone explain the problem with 69. Nxe4?? f5! 70. fe (the move I don't understand why the computer ignores)?

    The threat otherwise is just to swap off white's too pawns and leave a dead minor piece v king ending.

    Edit - I presume it's 70. ... Re1, and then black has both white pawns under control?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 918 ✭✭✭Ciaran


    cdeb wrote: »
    Can anyone explain the problem with 69. Nxe4?? f5! 70. fe (the move I don't understand why the computer ignores)?

    The threat otherwise is just to swap off white's too pawns and leave a dead minor piece v king ending.
    There's a fun stalemate after 70...Rb1 71.Kc6 Rxb6


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 7,265 Mod ✭✭✭✭cdeb


    That is very nice!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 278 ✭✭EnPassant


    cdeb wrote: »
    Can anyone explain the problem with 69. Nxe4?? f5! 70. fe (the move I don't understand why the computer ignores)?

    The threat otherwise is just to swap off white's too pawns and leave a dead minor piece v king ending.

    Edit - I presume it's 70. ... Re1, and then black has both white pawns under control?
    Rb1+ and Rxb6, Kxb6 is stalemate ?


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 7,265 Mod ✭✭✭✭cdeb


    4-0; result confirmed.

    Guess for once, Colm's blog later may be a useful source of info on just what happened there!


  • Registered Users Posts: 411 ✭✭brianhere


    The computer says its over and Colm lost, probably ran out of time. I think he was aiming to sacrifice his rook for that free pawn and see can he get stalemate/draw with his king against the other pawn (and presuming his opponent doesn't know how to checkmate with a knight and bishop alone).

    http://www.orwellianireland.com



  • Registered Users Posts: 411 ✭✭brianhere


    Yes I guess with the time the way it was it was hopeless anyway...

    http://www.orwellianireland.com



  • Registered Users Posts: 5 Astaneh


    Hi. Alex Lopez here. The live boards are completely wrong, and seem to be showing games from some other teams. We are currently down 1-0 (I lost) with the remaining three games to go. Board 1 is under a little bit of pressure, but the other two have good positions. Hopefully we will be able to win the match.


  • Registered Users Posts: 411 ✭✭brianhere


    Thanks Alex, that is good news for sure, I wonder what game we were watching!

    http://www.orwellianireland.com



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,034 ✭✭✭Ficheall


    Perhaps you could give us a few hints about the current positions and we can try to find out what teams have Ireland's games showing? :pac:


  • Registered Users Posts: 5 Astaneh


    Not such great news unfortunately. Baburin just lost (turns out his position was worse than I thought when I glanced at it after my game) and Daly only drew. Sam is a pawn up and I would expect him to win, but the best we can expect is 1.5-2.5. Our games are the ones being shown as Mozambique-Zimbabwe.


  • Registered Users Posts: 411 ✭✭brianhere


    Well I might as well set the ball rolling, Sam I take it is Wilton Calicoca and I wonder why didn't he put the bishop on f5 , going to h7, when he had the chance there?

    http://www.orwellianireland.com



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 411 ✭✭brianhere


    I was only wondering,I'm sure he is going to win anyway!

    http://www.orwellianireland.com



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,034 ✭✭✭Ficheall


    brianhere wrote: »
    Well I might as well set the ball rolling, Sam I take it is Wilton Calicoca and I wonder why didn't he put the bishop on f5 , going to h7, when he had the chance there?

    Because he grabbed a pawn instead?


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 7,265 Mod ✭✭✭✭cdeb


    So who missed that lovely stalemate trick, I wonder?


  • Registered Users Posts: 411 ✭✭brianhere


    I'm sorry the board updates erractically on this computer, I'm very sorry it didn't even show he was killing a pawn...it's crashing regularly on me! He is flying for sure...

    http://www.orwellianireland.com



  • Registered Users Posts: 411 ✭✭brianhere


    Anyway I was right that he would want to get his bishop on h7, now he can swing down with the king if he wants ..

    http://www.orwellianireland.com



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,034 ✭✭✭Ficheall


    cdeb wrote: »
    So who missed that lovely stalemate trick, I wonder?
    Eh? In this game with the bishops? Or the previous (reasonably obvious :P) stalemate which you were asking about earlier?


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 7,265 Mod ✭✭✭✭cdeb


    The one in the game that had a stalemate! :)

    As in, I wonder what game we all spent our afternoon watching?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    cdeb wrote: »
    Colm's blog later may be a useful source of info
    And pigs might fly out of my butt :D
    I'd check Jonathon O'Connor's facebook feed instead or wait to hear back from Sam or Alex.

    edit: Or just read all of the thread here I guess :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 411 ✭✭brianhere


    I think he will race the pawn to c2, back it up with the white square bishop, then hit c1 with the other bishop. It's all over anyway...

    http://www.orwellianireland.com



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 7,265 Mod ✭✭✭✭cdeb


    The site has kind of fixed itself, though now it shows Ireland 2-2 Sudan, with Mozambique and Zimbabwean flags underneath, while it's showing Mozambique 3½-½ Zimbabwe, with Irish and Sudanese flags underneath. And the individual games add up to a 2½-1½ defeat.

    Was it just the boards were programmed incorrectly then?


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 7,265 Mod ✭✭✭✭cdeb


    So we have Uganda in round 4. An IM and a CM top two boards. Might be one to give Sam a rest in as his norm chances can't really take too many low-rated players? Hope for a win and higher-rated opposition in round 5.

    The women have Chile, who had a bad result against Malaysia today, losing 3-1 where a 3-1 win was the expected score.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 883 ✭✭✭eclipsechaser


    cdeb wrote: »
    So we have Uganda in round 4. An IM and a CM top two boards. Might be one to give Sam a rest in as his norm chances can't really take too many low-rated players? Hope for a win and higher-rated opposition in round 5.

    The women have Chile, who had a bad result against Malaysia today, losing 3-1 where a 3-1 win was the expected score.

    What was the result for both teams? Did Sam win and against whom? Thanks!


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 7,265 Mod ✭✭✭✭cdeb


    Women's team lost 4-0. Bit unlucky.

    Main team lost 2.5-1.5. Sam beat 2150 or so. Colm drew; Alex and Alex lost.


  • Registered Users Posts: 411 ✭✭brianhere


    Well all the games are there now and we can see what happened. In my - distinctly unexpert! - opinion I think what has happened is that they got caught up in all this talk about going for open and unusual lines in order to take apart a weaker player who is otherwise trying to keep things tight and go for a draw. But its still the Olympiad and they should be still somewhat cautious?

    So for example Baburin sacrificed a pawn each on moves 27 and 28 which destroyed his pawn defences and opened it up for the opposition. It was to launch an attack that yielded a rook/knight exchange but then his opponent swapped queens and so that attack petered out. I think Baburin was sure he would come out on top once it opened up but he was letting down such a phalanx of pawns that with a good player it was always going to spell trouble?

    Alex Lopez played, I think anyways, way too open and gung-ho throughout and again I think underestimated his opponent.

    Sam also seemed to go for a more open, and hence leaking looking, defence originally but after a while he reverted to his more usual game and we got a bit of solidity e.g. he carefully defended with pawns both his bishops before he launched his attack and then won very well from what was a bad enough position originally.

    Colm bucked the trend and played an ordinary game and seemed to be winning by quite a bit in development at move 15 say. Then about 20 he got the prevailing fever and went gung-ho as well! (Correctly as it happens!) At move 25 he was -2.98 to the good then went a pawn up and could have gone another maybe? Anyway at about move 35 he looked very consolidated with his pawn up and maybe going onto win. (Just a query I wonder could he go f4 on move 53? edit: I see now, he was afraid to lose his pawn on e5 to a rook bishop combination). Anyway he definitely let his opponent get back at him with a passed pawn that Colm could have killed but possibly underestimated again? Then maybe in time trouble blundered a piece at which point it looked dire (move 60 ish). But then Colm worked out the pawn ending brilliantly to scrape the draw. Overall he was in control most of the time, playing well, and I guess was unlucky.

    Again this is just my, extremely, humble opinion and anyhow there is all to play for yet!

    http://www.orwellianireland.com



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 918 ✭✭✭Ciaran


    cdeb wrote: »
    So we have Uganda in round 4. An IM and a CM top two boards. Might be one to give Sam a rest in as his norm chances can't really take too many low-rated players?

    Norm chances are pretty much shot anyway I'd say. Performance of under 2400 at the moment, it'd need a massive finish to get it up to 2600.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,862 ✭✭✭mikhail


    I doubt they're making the teams to give Sam white. With Alex and Colm taking a break, that's just the way it has fallen. Unless it happens again, I'd just presume it's coincidence. Next round should tell us anyway.
    The pattern in the past has been that if he's close to the norm with a few round left, they'll start giving him whites then.
    Ciaran wrote: »
    Are the board orders not set in stone at the start, or am I thinking of some other competition?
    Yes, all they can do is choose which four play, so Sam can only play 1 (if Baburin is rested) or 2.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    Today's games up on the site here. Allegedly.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 7,265 Mod ✭✭✭✭cdeb


    The team captain, Jonathan O'Connor, has a diary on the ICU site here.

    Gary O'Grady has a diary on the women's team here

    And Noel Keating, captain of the Glorney teams, has a diary here (or maybe it's more of an intro)


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 7,265 Mod ✭✭✭✭cdeb


    Wonder what happened here?

    Can't imagine a 1900 wasn't aware of Fool's Mate.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    What the...?


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 2,165 Mod ✭✭✭✭L1m1tless


    Must be a joke, or maybe a bribe :D


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 7,265 Mod ✭✭✭✭cdeb


    If it's match fixing, you might want to make it a little bit less obvious!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    Why isn't the other player's rating listed?


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 7,265 Mod ✭✭✭✭cdeb


    Doesn't have one. Not all the players in the weaker teams - particularly in the women's section - have FIDE ratings.

    National ratings aren't used for this.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    That makes even less sense - an unrated FIDE player getting a fool's mate on a 1900 rated FIDE player?!?!?! Someone check if the leads on that board are all plugged in :D


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 7,265 Mod ✭✭✭✭cdeb


    An unrated FIDE player could still be 1900/2000 or higher, especially if they're from a country (like Togo) which presumably wouldn't have that many FIDE-rated chess tournaments. Most of the players in the Heidenfeld would have no FIDE rating, for example, but there's a fair few around 1600-1800.

    It's likely they're not quite that high, but it's not the same as being unrated at national level.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,862 ✭✭✭mikhail


    Sparks wrote: »
    That makes even less sense - an unrated FIDE player getting a fool's mate on a 1900 rated FIDE player?!?!?! Someone check if the leads on that board are all plugged in :D
    Lack of access to FIDE-rated tournaments can mean some players can be pretty strong without having a FIDE rating. Not that you have to be all that strong to pull off fool's mate.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 7,265 Mod ✭✭✭✭cdeb


    Looks like the black side of all the boards in the women's game is broken.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    It's getting some comment on the live stream now... they have no more idea than we do :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 411 ✭✭brianhere


    Anyway we are doing well now (if this is really us!). Baburin is beginning to bully his opponent, Sam feels strong enough to concede a pawn to open things up. Colm looks comfortable and is dominating a bit while Mark sacrificed a knight for an early queen attack. It might work but the computer doesn't like it.

    http://www.orwellianireland.com



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 411 ✭✭brianhere


    Sam's opponent is now in some trouble, dont think this will be a long game...

    http://www.orwellianireland.com



Advertisement