Wokeism of the day *Revised Mod Note in OP and threadbanned users*

You may not even understand what a stereotype is if you think men being physically stronger and faster is a stereotype. And what that article is supposed to prove, apart from your desperation, I don't know.

Well like I said earlier, based upon my personal preferences, I’ll go with the one who has the nice pair of tits… good sense of humour is also a plus.

(if I’m going to die, I’d like a glimpse of Heaven before I go, cos I’m pretty sure I’m destined to go the opposite direction when I die 😒)

Scientific facts are now stereotypes lol. Jesus wept.

You’ve got that arseways - stereotypes, are not scientific facts. Applying broad generalisations to specific situations, assuming a foregone conclusion, selecting only the criteria which support your already foregone conclusion, does not constitute scientific evidence, let alone any idea that it is a scientific fact. That’s the sort of idiocy that led to phrenology being regarded as a legitimate scientific fact which justified ill treatment of other groups of human beings. It has nothing to do with science, and everything to do with morality.

It’s why the other poster presented the false dilemma of having to choose between being rescued from a burning building by either a woman who’s a dwarf, or a man who’s built like an absolute unit. The whole hypothetical question is predicated upon false assumptions.

One doesn’t get to pick their rescuer for a start, and if I were to reverse that conundrum, I’d have to choose between dragging a dwarf out of a burning building, or the absolute unit. I know which one is immediately more practical from my perspective, but that’s me being pragmatic. You may well make a different decision in those hypothetical circumstances, all of which would be rendered irrelevant by the fact that firefighters work in teams, they don’t operate like some people imagine they would, or should. Much of the basics they learn in training are to avoid injuries to themselves, and avoid further injury to the general public.

The ‘have-a-go hero’ types are a danger to themselves, and more so to the general public. They’ll carry you out of a burning building over their shoulders without thinking about it first, but you may well end up in a wheelchair for the rest of your life, and that’s if he doesn’t bounce his 6ft frame off a sagging overhead beam due to low visibility, or isn’t overcome by smoke. There’s so many variables to your hypothetical scenario that whether men are faster, stronger or whatever else you think suits your ideal stereotype in that situation, are rendered irrelevant, because your ideal circumstances just don’t map to reality.

By your standards then, declaring that women being encouraged to be firefighters is is discrimination against men, must be woke as fcuk, cos it sure as hell has nothing to do with biology, scientific fact, or reality -

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_in_firefighting

Science

Bill Clinton was very sexist yes.

I do think upper body strength is important for moving heavy fire equipment, breaking into houses with an axe etc.

how did Scotland become so woke?

Jesus Christ !

At this stage I am convinced it's the left just being stubborn and thinking "This will really piss those conservatives off" ...

🤡🤡🤡

The Guardian need to be careful when its women vs trans as to criticize either group goes against the woke mindset. Which is their entire platform.

Ah come on, come on. Come on, come on. Come on, come on, come on.

Seriously though it's pure insanity.

Can't wait for the wokeys here standing up for paedo rights in the next few months.