Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

MGTOW = “men going their own way”

1246

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,608 ✭✭✭worded


    nthclare wrote: »
    It's funny how women often ditch white knights and nice guys and go for bastard's like myself.

    Female friends of mine who split up with their men, went for more alpha guys the next time and prefer a manly man who's independent,has some hobbies and isn't following her around like a pleb.

    Myself and my girlfriend see each other now and again, and have plenty of space because we prefer that.

    Year's ago men would go to war or go hunting and gathering, fishing etc for day's on end and the women would be at home and enjoy their friends and have great banter and craic.
    Any man who'd stay at home would be either ill disabled or a priest or law man.

    This probably declined 300 year's ago + gradually.

    In fairness 300 year's isn't a long time in terms of evolution.


    There is nothing funny about this particularly for the first partner.

    I read studies about this years ago and will post links if I can find them.

    A lot of women choose partner number #1 to be a good provider, good career, someone who will get the nest together and provide the first one or two kids. He could have a more squarish head I don’t know why, a metro sexual perhaps.

    So with the home set up she gets the wandering eye and now choose some one with tattoos, rough and probably more masculine, a motor biker, a bad boy. He can run faster and jump higher than partner #1 and so will his kids. Earning power isn’t important as she has the house. She is looking for different seed. It’s good for evolution.

    If tried with reverse partners .... the kids may have ended up homeless and she may never met the nest builder. Wiser to get the nest built first with the safe bet partner #1

    She may not have set out with the ex convict in mind as partner #2, it wasn’t a master plan but now she has options ....


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    generalisations about men and women are worthless in this context

    negative generalisations about the opposite sex because you arent having the results youd like are worthless and ugly

    negative generalisations about the members of your own gender who are having results in this sphere that you arent are worthless, ugly and transparent

    very few fellas are of the calibre of "instantly attractive" where they dont need to tick other boxes to enjoy decent long term relationships

    conversely, very few fellas are so hideously ugly that other factors - well within their control- couldnt come into play that see them happy within a relationship

    everyone seems to have their own observations, and without being able to verify people's actual happiness/success in love its hard to know what value to attach to opinions in a thread like this, but aside from the above two things being true as far as i can see, id add a third crucial one:

    most fellas in relationships are punching above their weight in terms of attractiveness.

    if there is a gender that is generally shallow about physical attraction, its us.

    after that, there's little enough on the various complaints against women you see in the MGTOW philosophy that couldnt go under one of two headings, imo

    "unrealistic standards (that one chick youve been fixating on? probably best broaden your search, and maybe check yr criteria)"

    and

    "things about yourself you could work on (but probably dont)"

    idk tho. any time you see a person look at the world and say "hmm that's the problem here, not me" you are probably not going to change any minds.

    when you see it as a philosophy, and others in the thread happy to encourage it, personally i think its a very toxic thing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,676 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    Men have 4 general ways to be attractive to women , appearance, confidence, wealth and status and except at the extreme end there isnt one of those factors a man cant improve. If an 18 year old guy thinks mgtow is for him, im just going to suggest he is a lazy entitled bastad. A bit of red pilling is useful to understand he equation of life but it should be a motivation to help stack the deck in your particular favor not to give up

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,014 ✭✭✭tylercheribini



    if there is a gender that is generally shallow about physical attraction, its us.

    Hole and a heartbeat(optional)you mean?


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    id add a third crucial one:

    most fellas in relationships are punching above their weight in terms of attractiveness.

    I was with you until you wrote this. The problem is that you're reinforcing the social conditioning that we've all been subjected to. The perception of what is commonly considered attractive, and also that women, throughout history, have no impact on the drive of that social conditioning.

    What is considered attractive is conditioning, as much as it is biology. There are the magazines, TV shows, movies, etc all of which promote certain aspects of women to show their appearance as being more important than it actually is. Which places an inordinate amount of importance on physical appearance. A lot of that comes from male biological imperatives, but there's also the social conditioning, which promotes something that women can sell... ie. their appearance.. suggesting that a male's appearance is somehow less than a woman's.

    In a relationship, nobody is punching above their weight, because a relationship usually requires far more than just physical attraction, in order to continue successfully. Personality comes into play, and there both genders should be considered equal...
    if there is a gender that is generally shallow about physical attraction, its us.

    I disagree. All you have to do is listen to any group of women who are commenting on the appearance of another woman outside of that group. Or the appearance/behavior of a celeb that they have some interest in. Instagram, and other social media apps, are drowning in nasty comments by women, in describing the appearance of other women, and that of men.

    While men are generally very committed to physical appearance as a way of measuring attractiveness, and that's been acknowledged throughout history, social conditioning has suggested that women do not behave the same way. And yet, they do. It's just that their areas to critic are different, but even there, things are changing with women becoming far more outspoken in judging the physical appearance of a man.

    I'd say that both genders can be equally superficial in judging others based solely on their physical appearance... the difference is that men generally don't critic the appearance of other men. Women do it to both genders.
    after that, there's little enough on the various complaints against women you see in the MGTOW philosophy that couldnt go under one of two headings, imo

    "unrealistic standards (that one chick youve been fixating on? probably best broaden your search, and maybe check yr criteria)"

    and

    "things about yourself you could work on (but probably dont)"

    idk tho. any time you see a person look at the world and say "hmm that's the problem here, not me" you are probably not going to change any minds.

    when you see it as a philosophy, and others in the thread happy to encourage it, personally i think its a very toxic thing.

    And I'd agree, in part, although, again, I think you're being rather selective here. Women have their own culture based around beauty, and the importance of physical appearance, just as many have demands that men meet certain financial markers before being deemed "worthy".

    I find it far more toxic to give women a free pass on this. I agree with you about the males, and what they're saying. I don't like this victim culture that has emerged over the last few decades, with so many people looking to escape their own responsibility for how their lives have turned out... but it's important to apply such judgments equally.

    The problem with the women's lib movement was that it sought to bring about equality, while retaining all of the past protections and benefits that previously existed. So we still have all the past mechanisms that made women so valuable in society, which promotes women to have a greater importance in society than men..


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    silverharp wrote: »
    Men have 4 general ways to be attractive to women , appearance, confidence, wealth and status and except at the extreme end there isnt one of those factors a man cant improve. If an 18 year old guy thinks mgtow is for him, im just going to suggest he is a lazy entitled bastad. A bit of red pilling is useful to understand he equation of life but it should be a motivation to help stack the deck in your particular favor not to give up

    Location, and the population nearby is important too. Look, I grew up in a mid-sized town in the Midlands. Even having a relatively large population for a town, the numbers of girls my age or within the socially acceptable ages for dating were very limited, considering we typically have close to equal numbers of males/females in this country. If choice is limited, and those women are set against you, (for whatever reasons), or you don't find them attractive (which I didn't), it's easy to convince yourself that something is very wrong. I think it's probably worse now with the rise of social media, because you see all the beauty in the world, but find none of it available in your hometown.

    And when you're young (and older too), it's very easy to believe that your hometown and surrounding county is the whole world.

    I find one of the best ways for people to get away with the MGTOW, or similar crap, is to move to somewhere with a larger population. A larger population offers greater diversity and a greater chance of encountering someone who finds you attractive (especially now that migration is more common, and you're not totally reliant on Irish women, and Irish considerations about dating).

    In any case, boys/men can change all of the four factors listed above, and still be unsuccessful, if they're limiting themselves to a relatively small population pool.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,676 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    Location, and the population nearby is important too. Look, I grew up in a mid-sized town in the Midlands. Even having a relatively large population for a town, the numbers of girls my age or within the socially acceptable ages for dating were very limited, considering we typically have close to equal numbers of males/females in this country. If choice is limited, and those women are set against you, (for whatever reasons), or you don't find them attractive (which I didn't), it's easy to convince yourself that something is very wrong. I think it's probably worse now with the rise of social media, because you see all the beauty in the world, but find none of it available in your hometown.

    And when you're young (and older too), it's very easy to believe that your hometown and surrounding county is the whole world.

    I find one of the best ways for people to get away with the MGTOW, or similar crap, is to move to somewhere with a larger population. A larger population offers greater diversity and a greater chance of encountering someone who finds you attractive (especially now that migration is more common, and you're not totally reliant on Irish women, and Irish considerations about dating).

    In any case, boys/men can change all of the four factors listed above, and still be unsuccessful, if they're limiting themselves to a relatively small population pool.

    Im sure it can be tricky but given that its mostly an American thing and its based on some of the dynamics is US and Canadian cities , for instance I remember coming across something about dating in NY which attracts a lot of young women and on the surface it looks like they have the chance to date plenty of successful men , but there arent as many single men as they think so they end up losing the game of stools they are not aware they are playing , meanwhile the more average guys are getting blanked.
    I dont know how to solve the issue collectively but on an individual level there are always ways to make improvements or find out how and where to meet the more reasonable type of women who have normal expectations.

    I remember last year getting the train to work (in Dublin) so you would tend to see the same people get on each day. There must be a bunch of IT type companies in the same place because a lot of the guys had a similar vibe, dressed like they were in college, having constant inane conversations about netflix and other nerdy stuff :pac: . Me looking on was thinking yeah I bet they arent dating a lot but they aint helping themselves either. It just didnt sound like they had social lives. At their age their feet shouldnt be touching the floor

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    silverharp wrote: »
    Im sure it can be tricky but given that its mostly an American thing and its based on some of the dynamics is US and Canadian cities , for instance I remember coming across something about dating in NY which attracts a lot of young women and on the surface it looks like they have the chance to date plenty of successful men , but there arent as many single men as they think so they end up losing the game of stools they are not aware they are playing , meanwhile the more average guys are getting blanked.

    You're focusing on the cities. The US has a wide range of small-medium sized towns with populations under 10-20k people. A lot of people head to the cities for a while, find out it didn't make them happy, and return to the small towns. MGTOW is far more than a city phenomenon.

    I spent some time in NY working as a consultant, and as part of networking, I was brought to the bars, many of whom had the reputation as single bars. Pickup joints. And yes, there was a lot of sex floating around, but it was sex with a price tag, since the women typically were looking for someone earning a decent salary. Not so much that they wanted the money themselves, but it was connected with status.. and peer reputation.

    If you ever spend more than a few weeks going to a singles bar, you quickly realise that the core population are regulars, with a few strays brought in as fresh blood. It was a lot of fun when I used to take dating seriously.. but it's an incredibly superficial environment.
    I dont know how to solve the issue collectively but on an individual level there are always ways to make improvements or find out how and where to meet the more reasonable type of women who have normal expectations.

    Not always. I was bitter for a very long time over my experiences with dating in Ireland. I have a shaking disorder which can't be "managed", and I received all manner of nastiness from women who thought I was nervous or shy, or simply broken. Women can be very cruel.. either intentionally or unintentionally. It doesn't matter though. I've met many guys over the years (I did a lot of speed seduction work at one time), who were treated horribly by women, and had the emotional scars. It stays with a guy, and takes a lot of work to remove. I think a lot of guys are far too dismissive of the impact that negative experiences while growing up, and again, when entering adult dating, can have.

    I'm, now, very good with women. I've been single most of my life, and I've studied interpersonal communication, along with psychology. Not the PUA BS but the useful stuff that really helps to understand, appreciate, and work with women. And I've had a lot of success in dating or just for sex. I'm single because I don't really want a serious relationship, nor do I want marriage. But the scars that I received as a teen... they're still there. My distrust of women I meet on any dating circuit are connected to those scars. So... while I agree that guys can change a lot about themselves, which can help them to succeed... at the same time, I think many here are far too flippant about the difficulties involved.

    As for how to change it collectively, it's like any habit. Break the cycle, by changing your environment completely. If guys are seriously wanting to change their lives and meet women, then they need to get away from the culture they were brought up in. The negative associations they have in their culture connected with the way, women of that culture behave, encourages the cycle to continue. Get some positive experiences away, and then return later, with a vastly different perspective. I know this works, because I did it, and I've had a wide variety of friends/students who have done the same.
    I remember last year getting the train to work (in Dublin) so you would tend to see the same people get on each day. There must be a bunch of IT type companies in the same place because a lot of the guys had a similar vibe, dressed like they were in college, having constant inane conversations about netflix and other nerdy stuff :pac: . Me looking on was thinking yeah I bet they arent dating a lot but they aint helping themselves either. It just didnt sound like they had social lives. At their age their feet shouldnt be touching the floor

    Times change. I know a variety of guys in IT who would traditionally have been called absolute geeks, and yet, they're all in relatively stable relationships with quite good looking women. Being a nerd or geek is attractive to some women. The internet changed a lot of the way that some women perceive men, especially those women who want a guy who is unlikely to cheat on her. Besides which, these guys also tend to get paid well, and be employable throughout their lives.


  • Registered Users Posts: 43 Jimmy Twotimes


    Just saw the girl I'm in love with holding hands with another guy. That's it, **** it. I seriously can't do this **** anymore. All this heartache and disappointment.

    I give up.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Just saw the girl I'm in love with holding hands with another guy. That's it, **** it. I seriously can't do this **** anymore. All this heartache and disappointment.

    I give up.

    You might want to grow up first, and put all the romantic movies away.

    Love? You were "in love" with someone who wasn't already your partner? How did you develop this love?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 43 Jimmy Twotimes


    You might want to grow up first, and put all the romantic movies away.

    Love? You were "in love" with someone who wasn't already your partner? How did you develop this love?

    Eh, I found her attractive and enjoyed her company? You don't start going out with someone and then decide 'oh yeah I love her'.

    Anyway fuk it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,495 ✭✭✭✭eviltwin


    Eh, I found her attractive and enjoyed her company? You don't start going out with someone and then decide 'oh yeah I love her'.

    Anyway fuk it.

    Yeah you do

    Anyway what you describe happens to most of us. You accept it with maturity and you move on.


  • Registered Users Posts: 43 Jimmy Twotimes


    eviltwin wrote: »
    Yeah you do

    Anyway what you describe happens to most of us. You accept it with maturity and you move on.

    Oh I'm ready to accept it alright


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Unrealistic expectations. Blame society for MTGOW because posters like the above want to equate love with attraction.


  • Registered Users Posts: 43 Jimmy Twotimes


    Unrealistic expectations. Blame society for MTGOW because posters like the above want to equate love with attraction.

    What does that even mean?


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    What does that even mean?

    Never mind. It doesn't matter.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,887 ✭✭✭iptba


    Are kids for me? New podcast hears from women choosing a child-free life
    Author Emilie Pine and other women speak about their decision not to have children in a new podcast. Host Margaret O’Connor explains why she created ‘Are Kids For Me?’
    https://www.irishexaminer.com/lifestyle/relationships/arid-40051217.html

    I imagine there would be quite a number of men who would prefer not have kids.


  • Registered Users Posts: 43 Jimmy Twotimes


    **** it no more mr nice guy. I'm gonna be a cruel heartless bastard and treat women like utter **** because the asshole types always get the girl

    This game is rigged boys


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 9,078 ✭✭✭IAMAMORON


    **** it no more mr nice guy. I'm gonna be a cruel heartless bastard and treat women like utter **** because the asshole types always get the girl

    This game is rigged boys

    This only works under 2 criteria.

    1) You are attractive
    2) You are loaded.

    Don't make the chronic mistake of pretending to be the hard lad, or even worse, deliberately being rude or nasty to women in an attempt to gain attention.

    The golden rule is that women will tolerate attractive or rich men who are rude, uncouth or treat them like chrap. It does not really bother them as long as their children are safe and that they are having a comfortable sex life and a comfortable living.

    Any attempt by losers or ugly men to try any chrap on will result in a dumping. No matter how far up or down the ladder you are on.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,495 ✭✭✭✭eviltwin


    **** it no more mr nice guy. I'm gonna be a cruel heartless bastard and treat women like utter **** because the asshole types always get the girl

    This game is rigged boys

    All because some girl you fancy doesn't like you back?

    Grow up.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 43 Jimmy Twotimes


    IAMAMORON wrote: »
    This only works under 2 criteria.

    1) You are attractive
    2) You are loaded.

    Don't make the chronic mistake of pretending to be the hard lad, or even worse, deliberately being rude or nasty to women in an attempt to gain attention.

    The golden rule is that women will tolerate attractive or rich men who are rude, uncouth or treat them like chrap. It does not really bother them as long as their children are safe and that they are having a comfortable sex life and a comfortable living.

    Any attempt by losers or ugly men to try any chrap on will result in a dumping. No matter how far up or down the ladder you are on.

    You are right of course. I just feel dead on the inside. I'm never going to open up to a woman again, never give her my heart. Unless it's casual sex, I'm not interested.

    Actually feels liberating. I'm going to get wasted and read Charles Bukowski. I believe he's the closest any man has got to understanding the nature of women.


  • Registered Users Posts: 43 Jimmy Twotimes


    eviltwin wrote: »
    All because some girl you fancy doesn't like you back?

    Grow up.

    **** off

    I'm just fed up with life and women in general

    Sorry shouldn't have said that

    My head is just ****ed right now


  • Registered Users Posts: 422 ✭✭john123470


    Why all this fussin and the chasin. Feminism this, mgtow
    that, Lesbian lives matter ..

    Who cares ..

    Why not invest 10-15 grand on a top shelf,
    silicon Japanese made doll ..

    Your costs will be minimal after the initial outlay ..

    Sling her over the shoulder at wkends and head
    to the car wash to hose her out ...
    = your social outing

    And she speaks 4 languages (Irish, optional)..

    I mean with that out of the way, you'd be able
    to focus on the stuff that really matters ..

    Just sayin ..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,147 ✭✭✭Mister Vain


    john123470 wrote: »
    Why all this fussin and the chasin. Feminism this, mgtow
    that, Lesbian lives matter ..

    Who cares ..

    Why not invest 10-15 grand on a top shelf,
    silicon Japanese made doll ..


    Your costs will be minimal after the initial outlay ..

    Sling her over the shoulder at wkends and head
    to the car wash to hose her out ...
    = your social outing

    And she speaks 4 languages (Irish, optional)..

    I mean with that out of the way, you'd be able
    to focus on the stuff that really matters ..

    Just sayin ..
    Fook that. A flesh light would be a much cheaper alternative. Spend the 10 grand on a car.
    Post edited by Boards.ie: Niamh on


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 9,078 ✭✭✭IAMAMORON


    Fook that. A fleshlight would be a much cheaper alternative. Spend the 10 grand on a car.

    Most decent birds would run a mile if they thought you were a cheapskate :pac::pac: ......( sorry )


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    **** it no more mr nice guy. I'm gonna be a cruel heartless bastard and treat women like utter **** because the asshole types always get the girl

    This game is rigged boys

    Okay. Tell me something. What kind of relationship did you have with the girl?

    You were friends, and you shared your feelings with her? Did anything physical ever happen with her? Did you ask her out, show your interest in her, or do anything to peak her interest in you?

    Where is this love supposed to have evolved from? As being her friend? Purely physical attraction?

    You get, what you put in. If you behave as a friend, most times all you'll get is friendship back.

    As for being a cruel heartless bastard, it's overrated, although i suppose it's worth doing a few times in your life, because it'll teach you a lot about yourself. All the same, two things will likely happen. You'll end up with fragile, clingy, damaged women.. or you'll leave damaged women behind you. Neither is healthy, and frankly, should be avoided.


  • Registered Users Posts: 422 ✭✭john123470


    Fook that. A flesh light would be a much cheaper alternative. Spend the 10 grand on a car.

    Ah man, you gotta treat yourself to the best there is. You deserve better than some liver in a jam jar dildo from Eurogiant or Dealz ..

    These floppy silicone babes are as good as it gets. Every nook and cranny (down there) reproduced to perfection

    You can buy her a nice little outfit every now and then ..

    You'll be leavin work early to be with her

    You'll lose weight ..


    You'll feel less needy / clingy with women

    She can whisper .. you can feel her 'breath' in your ear ..

    I get excited just writing this .. so i'll stop for now ..

    10 grand, like i say with the optional Irish thrown in - you'd be set for life .. She'll never grow old on you, take sick days, argue back ... an all round decent skin.

    And if you have a friend with a floppy woman, ye can get together with the dolls .. flop around ..maybe do a bit of swopping ..

    Endless possibilities ..
    Post edited by Boards.ie: Niamh on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,147 ✭✭✭Mister Vain


    john123470 wrote: »
    Ah man, you gotta treat yourself to the best there is. You deserve better than some liver in a jam jar dildo from Eurogiant or Dealz ..

    These floppy silicone babes are as good as it gets. Every nook and cranny (down there) reproduced to perfection

    You can buy her a nice little outfit every now and then ..

    You'll be leavin work early to be with her

    You'll lose weight ..


    You'll feel less needy / clingy with women

    She can whisper .. you can feel her 'breath' in your ear ..

    I get excited just writing this .. so i'll stop for now ..

    10 grand, like i say with the optional Irish thrown in - you'd be set for life .. She'll never grow old on you, take sick days, argue back ... an all round decent skin.

    And if you have a friend with a floppy woman, ye can get together with the dolls .. flop around ..maybe do a bit of swopping ..

    Endless possibilities ..
    hookaay... that's enough internet for today.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    john123470 wrote: »
    She can whisper .. you can feel her 'breath' in your ear ..

    I get excited just writing this .. so i'll stop for now ..
    .

    Nah. it's creepy, and I can't imagine it as being healthy from a psychological perspective. A flesh light, fine. Not my thing but understandable. This doll thing.. ugh.

    Personally, I prefer to go without. I can last until I'm with a woman again.
    Post edited by Boards.ie: Niamh on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,608 ✭✭✭worded


    Nah. it's creepy, and I can't imagine it as being healthy from a psychological perspective. A fleshlight, fine. Not my thing but understandable. This doll thing.. ugh.

    Personally, I prefer to go without. I can last until I'm with a woman again.

    Put Nail varnish on one hand and when it dries put that hand in the freezer for one or two mins. Feels and looks like someone else’s hand then


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 9,078 ✭✭✭IAMAMORON


    worded wrote: »
    Put Nail varnish on one hand and when it dries put that hand in the freezer for one or two mins. Feels and looks like someone else’s hand then

    If you are used to Alaskan hand jobs actioned with a blind fold.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,676 ✭✭✭✭silverharp



    Times change. I know a variety of guys in IT who would traditionally have been called absolute geeks, and yet, they're all in relatively stable relationships with quite good looking women. Being a nerd or geek is attractive to some women. The internet changed a lot of the way that some women perceive men, especially those women who want a guy who is unlikely to cheat on her. Besides which, these guys also tend to get paid well, and be employable throughout their lives.

    I'm not writing off a whole sector, Im sure Im talking about a minority, it would depend on they would answer a survey about how happy they are with their social lives and do they view the dating/relationship scene as largely a good one or am overly frustrating one.

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,608 ✭✭✭worded


    silverharp wrote: »
    Men have 4 general ways to be attractive to women , appearance, confidence, wealth and status and except at the extreme end there isnt one of those factors a man cant improve. If an 18 year old guy thinks mgtow is for him, im just going to suggest he is a lazy entitled bastad. A bit of red pilling is useful to understand he equation of life but it should be a motivation to help stack the deck in your particular favor not to give up

    Two examples of wealth - see attached.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,448 ✭✭✭BrianD3


    Discussion on MGTOW often seems to revolve around women and (avoiding) marriage, women are only interested in you as a sperm and money donor etc. My take on MGTOW is that there is much more to it than that. As I said in an earlier post, it has common ground with the FIRE movement. Also involves resilience and independence and not being a good little worker drone whose efforts benefit other people.

    I'm in my 40s and it is finally dawning on me that most of my friendships have been transactional/situational, that I cannot rely on other people to give a crap about me or on "friends" to make any effort to keep friendships alive.

    As an aside, my mother has dementia and I am her sole carer - even though the dementia is not too bad yet, the few remaining "friends" that she had have disappeared, this isn't a coincidence. The so called health service is also completely useless, no home help to assist me/my mother. Also, not even one f*cking physiotherapy session to help her rehab after she fell a few months ago. Again, you can't rely on anyone.

    I've also been shafted in the workplace by people who claimed to be mates beforehand - and even now, post shafting, are still using the phrase "as a friend...". :rolleyes:

    I think the red pill idea of "frame" when dealing with women is also applicable to other areas of a man's life.

    Save your money, lift weights, don't take any sh*t, don't rely on the state, treat everybody you meet with suspicion unless they prove otherwise. And even then, realise that any relationship that you form with anyone is probably going to be transactional unless you are very fortunate.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 9,078 ✭✭✭IAMAMORON


    @BrianD3 , I understand the frustration, but part of MGTOW is finding a suitable vacuum to insulate yourself from mental torture. Yes, it is frustrating when you realise that you were just an element of a shallow friends mental design, but you cannot get bitter at this realisation.

    The world is full of solid, decent people. This is the truth. Stop wasting your time wallowing in self pity, you seem smart, pick your pain up and own it. Once you have done this categorise in the " shít I am not doing again and have no more time for going forward " section of your priorities. Only do and share stuff, things and your life with people who are worth it. They are everywhere. Do not wallow in bitterness, it will not help.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,014 ✭✭✭tylercheribini


    There are journalists linking MGTOW with Trump and white supremacy, never witnessed it meself, what I take from it is lads just not arsed getting married, which I felt like anyway before I even knew what MGTOW was.


  • Registered Users Posts: 422 ✭✭john123470


    BrianD3 wrote: »

    Save your money, lift weights, don't take any sh*t, don't rely on the state, treat everybody you meet with suspicion unless they prove otherwise. And even then, realise that any relationship that you form with anyone is probably going to be transactional unless you are very fortunate.

    Exactly this ^^. Pity its not on the curriculum in schools.

    And its not 'bitterness' as someone described the above. It seems to be a practical common sense take on how he sees things. He's not threatening anyone. Hes trying to deal with his reality

    Good luck with your mother. Kudos for taking care of her


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    BrianD3 wrote: »
    Save your money, lift weights, don't take any sh*t, don't rely on the state, treat everybody you meet with suspicion unless they prove otherwise. And even then, realise that any relationship that you form with anyone is probably going to be transactional unless you are very fortunate.

    All relationships are transactional to one extent or another. There's always a give and take involved. Sometimes the exchange is obvious, and others less so.

    I think it's just easier to see it this way because we're single in our 40s. I find people in loving relationships trick themselves into believing that there's nothing being transacted, but the truth is that trust is being exchanged, along with security or any number of other reasons to stay together.

    Still, none of that is a negative. If anything, recognising the transactional aspect of relationships is a positive because you can judge what's needed to create or maintain the relationship.
    There are journalists linking MGTOW with Trump and white supremacy, never witnessed it meself, what I take from it is lads just not arsed getting married, which I felt like anyway before I even knew what MGTOW was.

    As with any large movement, it attracts all sorts. Journalists want to find the sticky dramatic angles to report on. There's nothing interesting about a group of guys supporting each other... but linking them to extreme woman haters? That's going to sell well.

    I know a variety of people who describe themselves as part of MTGOW. Most are normal guys who have decided to simplify their lives, but reducing the impact that women can influence... There's no hatred, anger, or bitterness. Whereas I am a moderator on a number of male support groups, and you'll often see such bitterness/hate, and yet, these guys wouldn't ever consider themselves as MTGOW.

    It's like feminists. Some are complete nutters, many as ignorant asshats, some pursue agendas of their own, and many others have very pure/positive intentions... MTGOW is similar. People and journalists (especially Americans) feel the need to simplify everything, removing the shades of complexity... trying to find the drama.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,887 ✭✭✭iptba


    I think a lot of men can get frustrated by the rules of the transaction: they can feel they are sticking to their side of the bargain but still aren’t benefiting e.g. with sex. So it’s different to many simpler transactions.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    iptba wrote: »
    I think a lot of men can get frustrated by the rules of the transaction: they can feel they are sticking to their side of the bargain but still aren’t benefiting e.g. with sex. So it’s different to many simpler transactions.

    I think the problem is the pedestal that many boys/men put women on. They consider the woman to have greater value than they would place on themselves, not that they ever consider their own value, but place an inordinate amount of importance on the women in their sight. It could be sex, beauty, a meeting of minds, whatever, but even as a gender, women tend to placed on a special kind of pedestal, with high expectations included, but fail to meet those expectations.... because they're still human and flawed.

    The rules are what you make of them. It's really that simple. However, many guys will accept perceived common rules coming from society, as if they need to follow them religiously... In most areas of society where men are involved, they negotiate, argue, push for their own needs to be covered. It's one of the main drivers behind male success vs female success in society/work. Men, typically, pursue their professional aims with greater determination, making up the rules that suit them best.

    However, when it comes to women, they no longer do that. Instead, they accept the boundaries that women set, and then get frustrated when women move those boundaries or simply pick someone else. If you're honest with yourself, virtually all of your successful relationships happened because you didn't accept her frame about the relationship, instead, you put your own rules/objectives into play.

    This is not about being a bastard, or an evil prick. It's about being a man. Which is why we see so many attacks on being a man by feminists, because men won't accept the BS rules that they put into play. Whereas, a needy guy will. Thus passing all power/influence over to the female gender. So... be a man. Take control over your life. Don't get bitter because in all likelihood, the mistakes happened because you stopped guiding the relationship... you allowed the woman to take control somewhere along the way. And once that happens, she will, invariably lose respect for you, and try to find someone else who will challenge her.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 545 ✭✭✭CageWager


    iptba wrote: »
    I think a lot of men can get frustrated by the rules of the transaction: they can feel they are sticking to their side of the bargain but still aren’t benefiting e.g. with sex. So it’s different to many simpler transactions.

    This is very true.

    If a women wants to withhold sex after a certain length of time in a relationship it is deemed perfectly ok - in fact a husband would be demonised for seeking sex from her or someone else, i.e not just accepting her diktat (pun intended) :D

    On the flip side - if I get into a relationship with a women and one of the main attractions from her POV is my above average income and resulting lifestyle, I can't turn around after 10 years and say "hey babe, I just don't feel like earning $250k per year any more so I am going to unilaterally quit my job, sell the house, give all my money to charity, and take a part time job in the local spar.

    I'd image the man withholding money would get a very different reaction to the women withholding sex. With her its "her body, her choice". With him its "you earn it, I am entitled to it in perpetuity".

    Another delightful double standard that gets absolutely no media coverage.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 9,078 ✭✭✭IAMAMORON


    iptba wrote: »
    I think a lot of men can get frustrated by the rules of the transaction: they can feel they are sticking to their side of the bargain but still aren’t benefiting e.g. with sex. So it’s different to many simpler transactions.

    I know plenty of married men who shrug their shoulders at this. Some of them have had flings and almost all of them have engaged a sex worker. I say almost all because I cannot be sure in 2 cases and I would not like to insinuate.

    But by the by, any men I know who are living in a sexless marriage are actively seeking nookie elsewhere. I don't blame them either.

    In saying all that, I also know of two married women who not only turned off the matrimonial taps, but also played the field elsewhere. That also happens.

    Which leads inevitably to the divorce argument and its' inequalities. As I said most men that I am friendly with have engaged a sex worker and lived with the guilt as opposed to the detriment of splitting their family and exposing them to heartache. I would imagine there are a few wives out there that might be shrugging their shoulders ( albeit disconcertingly) at this fact also.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,887 ✭✭✭iptba


    IAMAMORON wrote: »
    I know plenty of married men who shrug their shoulders at this. Some of them have had flings and almost all of them have engaged a sex worker. I say almost all because I cannot be sure in 2 cases and I would not like to insinuate.

    But by the by, any men I know who are living in a sexless marriage are actively seeking nookie elsewhere. I don't blame them either.

    In saying all that, I also know of two married women who not only turned off the matrimonial taps, but also played the field elsewhere. That also happens.

    Which leads inevitably to the divorce argument and its' inequalities. As I said most men that I am friendly with have engaged a sex worker and lived with the guilt as opposed to the detriment of splitting their family and exposing them to heartache. I would imagine there are a few wives out there that might be shrugging their shoulders ( albeit disconcertingly) at this fact also.
    It is now against the law to use a sex worker in Ireland (though not to provide the service) meaning it’s a bigger gamble than in the past to use one


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 9,078 ✭✭✭IAMAMORON


    iptba wrote: »
    It is now against the law to use a sex worker in Ireland (though not to provide the service) meaning it’s a bigger gamble than in the past to use one

    You are spot on and I understand and respect the nature of your response.


  • Registered Users Posts: 545 ✭✭✭CageWager


    iptba wrote: »
    It is now against the law to use a sex worker in Ireland (though not to provide the service) meaning it’s a bigger gamble than in the past to use one


    That's why god invented golf trips to Portugal and Spain, right? ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,853 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    I find lots of this interestimg. But at the end of the day, isnt it all human.nature? Is it mens fault we are attracted to usually younger, good looking females?

    So can you really blame them being attracted to status, hierarchy etc? I mean we are only highly evolved animals at the end of the day...

    Women can have sex on tap. Men would love that. Many men can get it with women, even when they are poor. Lots of men dont struggle with attracting women. I get its a bit of a lottery, your looks, personalify etc... some are just luckier than others. But I found in my younger days, mid thirties now. The average lads did bloody well , if they had the confidence to approach...

    Was on few tinder dates over last few months, the women said, what they wouldnt give to be approached in a bar these days!


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,992 ✭✭✭Mongfinder General


    I think that any man who finds himself in a loveless, sexless marriage has to be smart and try to get along with his wife. In effect, play the long game. If a man slings his hook, storms out and finds an abode elsewhere, he will get slaughtered in the family law court. He will be on the hook for tens of thousands Euro.

    This is easier said than done. It involves an extreme level of persistence and patience. You will need to be mentally and physically strong. You have to be able to take the **** you hate for a prolonged period of time and pretty much agree to your wife controlling your life, relationship and family home. You will need to watch every penny and try to get as much money offside as possible without it showing up in a bank account. And without your wife noticing. It can be done. You'll then need to choose a time that facilitates an exit that benefits you (hopefully when kids have grown up). When you do decide to do this, the reaction of your wife can range from total shock to incandescent rage.

    Chances are, she'll be extremely resentful to begin with. Bitterness will grow when the cost hits home - no help with tv and broadband bills, car insurance, car payments, electricity, gas, health insurance, home or life insurance etc. None of this is your concern unless a judge says so. Plus all the chores and work you do in helping maintain the family home now falls on her.

    Be strategic. Action can be the enemy of thought. Do not rush things. That's what probably got you into the mess in the first place.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,887 ✭✭✭iptba


    I think that any man who finds himself in a loveless, sexless marriage has to be smart and try to get along with his wife. In effect, play the long game. If a man slings his hook, storms out and finds an abode elsewhere, he will get slaughtered in the family law court. He will be on the hook for tens of thousands Euro.

    This is easier said than done. It involves an extreme level of persistence and patience. You will need to be mentally and physically strong. You have to be able to take the **** you hate for a prolonged period of time and pretty much agree to your wife controlling your life, relationship and family home. You will need to watch every penny and try to get as much money offside as possible without it showing up in a bank account. And without your wife noticing. It can be done. You'll then need to choose a time that facilitates an exit that benefits you (hopefully when kids have grown up). When you do decide to do this, the reaction of your wife can range from total shock to incandescent rage.

    Chances are, she'll be extremely resentful to begin with. Bitterness will grow when the cost hits home - no help with tv and broadband bills, car insurance, car payments, electricity, gas, health insurance, home or life insurance etc. None of this is your concern unless a judge says so. Plus all the chores and work you do in helping maintain the family home now falls on her.

    Be strategic. Action can be the enemy of thought. Do not rush things. That's what probably got you into the mess in the first place.
    Interesting. Though there is a reasonable chance she might push for a divorce before that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,268 ✭✭✭✭Sleepy


    I think it's pretty standard advice for any man facing a divorce to take out a loan to upgrade the car, make regular cash withdrawals to be "frittered away in the pub/bookies" and generally use any means at their disposal to limit what the court sees as your "disposable" income in order to minimise the financial impact of a divorce. The sad reality for many is no matter what they do, they simply can't afford to leave a marriage: one decent income can be stretched to support a household, it can't cover two. And in most households where there's only one income, or only one substantial income, it's the man who'll be earning it. I'm fortunate in that we have a happy marriage but I'm under no illusions that were things to go wrong, I'd be destitute.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 9,078 ✭✭✭IAMAMORON


    In fairness to all concerned, marriage is a life long contract. Everyone heading in there need to check themselves before entering. The fact remains that the law remains on the side of the family, rightly so.

    Any man getting married needs to be aware of the contract and if he is planning on children he is looking at at least a 20-25 year sentence. The law may appear unfair, but no man can crib once he has taken the vows.

    I am not picking sides here either, but men need to know the consequences of marriage.

    It is a leap of faith and it is the responsibility of both partners to enable a successful marriage, this may not work, but men need to make firm decisions before they go there.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement