Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Why do socialists go bald? *MOD WARNING POST 70*

13»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,927 ✭✭✭kanuseeme


    Das Reich wrote: »
    Mussolini was bald and short but at the same time had 6 children and younger lovers.

    Mussolini was a socialist, don't know if he had hair at that time, maybe it was a second reason to kick him out.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOzezrUxAMk about 2 minutes in, most of his videos are entertaining.

    Lenin mentioned?


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,807 ✭✭✭ShatterAlan


    kanuseeme wrote: »
    Mussolini was a socialist, don't know if he had hair at that time, maybe it was a second reason to kick him out.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOzezrUxAMk about 2 minutes in, most of his videos are entertaining.

    Lenin mentioned?


    To get back to the inanity of the thread title....male baldness is a consequence of a genetic aberration passed on through the females of the bloodline. No medical or scientific studies have ever linked it to one's preference in economic modalities.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,927 ✭✭✭kanuseeme




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,509 ✭✭✭✭kowloon


    Dont know why the fck Mussolini is being brought up as an eg of a bald wingnut. He was born into Socialist Royalty, named afrer famed Mexican socialist leader Benito Juarez.

    He styled Fasci Italiani di Combettimento off the Italian Socialist Party. His father being heavily in left wing politics.


    None of their economic policies were right wing in nature, likewise the Germans.

    Have you seen Dinesh D'Souza's Death of a Nation or his videos on PragerU (Youtube Channel)?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,509 ✭✭✭✭kowloon


    To get back to the inanity of the thread title....male baldness is a consequence of a genetic aberration passed on through the females of the bloodline. No medical or scientific studies have ever linked it to one's preference in economic modalities.

    The thread is just a weak excuse to have a rant people who have hurt the OPs feelings, they don't really believe that baldness causes socialism. They got upset and called it childish when someone insulted capitalists.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,784 ✭✭✭✭padd b1975


    Cobalt17 wrote: »
    “Graduated from the school of hard knocks”
    “Works at full-time mad bastard”

    Works at Socialist World is another beauty.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,135 ✭✭✭Better Than Christ


    Cobalt17 wrote: »
    Varadkar was a Doctor at a hospital for several years, but don’t let that get in your way.

    A couple of years as a junior doctor before he became a TD, which is also a proper job. I don't think Simon Harris has ever had a job outside of politics, but that's fine because politics is a proper job.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,995 ✭✭✭Ipso


    kowloon wrote: »
    Have you seen Dinesh D'Souza's Death of a Nation or his videos on PragerU (Youtube Channel)?

    He thinks he’s a wit. He’s half right.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 135 ✭✭Cobalt17


    A couple of years as a junior doctor before he became a TD, which is also a proper job. I don't think Simon Harris has ever had a job outside of politics, but that's fine because politics is a proper job.

    Seven years is more than a couple.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,490 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    kowloon wrote: »
    Trump has no hair deficiency :D.

    It just isn't his hair.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,638 ✭✭✭✭Arghus


    They need extra cooling so their massive brains don't overheat.

    At least that's my excuse.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,639 ✭✭✭andekwarhola


    Cobalt17 wrote: »
    Are you short and bald?

    You're mixing me up with your aul wan.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,633 ✭✭✭✭Widdershins


    Testosterone deficiency?

    Being a bit tongue in cheek but that is the stereotyke Ive heard


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,202 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    Cobalt17 wrote: »
    Look at Paul Murphy, Boyd Barrett, Gino Kenny etc. All of them are suffering from some form of male pattern baldness.

    There also all under 6 ft. Do these people simply have weak genetics?

    Mod Note:

    Cobalt17 and ShatterAlan, quit the back and forth bickering. Any issues with a post and report it.
    I am not being mean ...but leo ..trump??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,717 ✭✭✭YFlyer


    Not a believer in Jesus.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,202 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    Testosterone deficiency?

    Being a bit tongue in cheek but that is the stereotyke Ive heard


    No. Its a gene that makes the receptors in the hair follicle of men highly sensitive to testosterone.

    Their testosterone levels used to be thought to be high. But actually they are just normal but the receptors in that area are overly sensitive to the hormone due to the gene. It's genetics. Altering the testosterone levels won't do anything.

    Men with low testosterone levels can go bald also. The gene or several just makes the receptors hyper sensitive to any level of testosterone.

    Its nothing to do with the amount of testosterone circulating.

    They don't fully understand why the receptors do this ...but an enzyme is produced that turns testosterone into another substance that kills off hair follicles.

    But receptors on the face etc ...act differently. And so are unaffected.

    Its why testosterone as a hormone acts differently on diff parts of the body. The receptors have different levels of sensitivity and act differently etc.

    Its why altering testosterone levels has never worked. Its also why follicle grafts etc ...in my lay person's opinion will only work for a short time also until the hair follicles are killed in the same way.

    But people don't realize this about a hair graft because the gene starts killing off the follicle years before you actually get baldness. It makes the growing cycle shorter. But men don't realize because they cut their hair ages before the growing cycle of that hair stops and falls out.

    China has the least male baldness. They realized that chinese women can grow their hair really long quickly and have long growing cycles. Its harder to measure on men because of the tradition of shorts cuts on men. But the longer the growing cycle and the faster the hair grows the healthier the hair follicle is. Its thought that this is genetic.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,135 ✭✭✭Better Than Christ


    Cobalt17 wrote: »
    Seven years is more than a couple.

    He must have been double-jobbing then, because he became a TD in 2007. Regardless, does the fact that he spent some time working as a junior doctor make him any better at his job than if he had more or less gone straight into politics like Simon Harris, Micheal Martin or Paul Murphy? I would say it's irrelevant.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,202 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    He must have been double-jobbing then, because he became a TD in 2007. Regardless, does the fact that he spent some time working as a junior doctor make him any better at his job than if he had more or less gone straight into politics like Simon Harris, Micheal Martin or Paul Murphy? I would say it's irrelevant.

    Yes it probably does make him better ..but you have to admit Simon Harris , Micheal Martin and Paul Murphy etc ...its a very very low bar.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,135 ✭✭✭Better Than Christ


    Yes it probably does make him better ..but you have to admit Simon Harris , Micheal Martin and Paul Murphy etc ...its a very very low bar.

    In what way does it make him better?

    They were just three examples - the Dáil is full of people who've never had careers outside of politics or political activism. Bertie Ahern - briefly worked as an accounts clerk before entering politics. Brian Cowen - may have worked as a solicitor for a year or two before inheriting his dead dad's seat. Enda Kenny - spent four years working as a primary school teacher before inheriting his dead dad's seat. Albert Reynolds is the only one I can think of who had any kind of meaningful career before politics (dance halls and dog food) and I don't think he was any better (or worse) than any of the other Taoisigh.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,202 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    In what way does it make him better?

    It would have definitely helped him for the current situation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,202 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    I realized Simon Harris is a college drop out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,033 ✭✭✭✭Richard Hillman


    Mao Zedong
    Slobodan Milosovic
    Vladimir Lenin

    The list goes on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,202 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    Putin.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,477 ✭✭✭AllForIt


    Because they're always pulling their hair out for never getting the ideologically fair society they want.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,995 ✭✭✭Ipso


    AllForIt wrote: »
    Because they're always pulling their hair out for never getting the ideologically fair society they want.

    Or because there’s never enough or the wrong kind implemented, or the state of Cuba and Venezuela.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,558 ✭✭✭Stacksofwacks


    Whats the point of threads like these, great minds discuss ideas, small minds talk about people


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,564 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    I realized Simon Harris is a college drop out.

    As is Pearse Doherty, what's your point?


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,639 ✭✭✭andekwarhola


    Both had unhappy stint in Health.
    It says a lot about both men, not able for lesser job but i want to be boss.
    Martin's stint was 20 years ago and he was not able to sort it.
    Varadker ducked out of it pretty quickly and i cannot remember the circumstances but the job wasn't done.

    Sorting out the health system has eluded far more ministers than one, to be fair.

    It's because no government had ever been ideologically inclined to risk dismantling the current byzantinesstructures and take on the unions and go back to the electorate.


Advertisement