Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Irish Championship 2020

124

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 262 ✭✭RooksPawn


    Round 4 draw below, in score order, though there are only a few people seated out of the normal order. "Top" board is again board 9 and likely to remain so if Sam retains the lead. The way the scoring has gone means there are only two "floated" pairings.

    Unless Nepo' can hit back against Magnus, tomorrow will be the last day the Legends of Chess compete for attention with the Irish Championship.

    In score order:
    Sam Collins (3) v Colm Daly (2.5)
    Tom O'Gorman (2.5) v Tarun K (2.5)

    Trisha K (2.5) v Conor O'Donnell (2);

    Darragh Moran v David Fitzsimons; Shane Melaugh v Paul Wallace; Killian Delaney v Jonathan O'Connor (all 2pts);

    Stephen Brady (1.5) v Peter Carroll (1.5); David Murray v Brendan Lyons; Adam Collins v Jacob Flynn; Kavin Venkatesan v Carl Jackson (also all on 50%);

    Gerry O'Connell (1) v Eoghan Casey (1); Gavin Melaugh v Leon Putar; Alex Byrne v Jonathan Peoples; Peter Cafolla v Gerry MacElligott (also all on 1/3);

    Kevin McHugh v Lara Putar (both on half a point);

    Diana Mirza v Alice O'Gorman (both 0/3).

    Good luck to everyone and hoping for some lively games again tomorrow.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 627 ✭✭✭Retd.LoyolaCpt


    Commentary on the Irish starts today at 6.30pm with FM Henry Li joined by former Irish Champion, FM Stephen Jessel on Henry's twitch account: https://www.twitch.tv/theyellowdragoon


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,300 ✭✭✭sodacat11


    cdeb wrote: »
    Any feedback from anyone playing on how the playing conditions are?
    I had my first game on the two board set up today and I must say that I found it very weird. It is hard to see the clock and also hard to see which sides long arm is pressed down so if you are away from the board it is hard to see whose move it is. I also didnt enjoy having to verbalise the moves and I was constantly checking to make sure that I hadnt forgotten to make my opponents move on my board. I think that the people who are playing on the two boards and are used to them certainly have a competitive advantage.The one board set up is brilliant!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 479 ✭✭Joedryan


    sodacat11 wrote: »
    I had my first game on the two board set up today and I must say that I found it very weird. It is hard to see the clock and also hard to see which sides long arm is pressed down so if you are away from the board it is hard to see whose move it is. I also didnt enjoy having to verbalise the moves and I was constantly checking to make sure that I hadnt forgotten to make my opponents move on my board. I think that the people who are playing on the two boards and are used to them certainly have a competitive advantage.The one board set up is brilliant!!

    seemed to work out ok for you results wise, nice win!


  • Registered Users Posts: 31 FutureCM


    sodacat11 wrote: »
    I had my first game on the two board set up today and I must say that I found it very weird. It is hard to see the clock and also hard to see which sides long arm is pressed down so if you are away from the board it is hard to see whose move it is. I also didnt enjoy having to verbalise the moves and I was constantly checking to make sure that I hadnt forgotten to make my opponents move on my board. I think that the people who are playing on the two boards and are used to them certainly have a competitive advantage.The one board set up is brilliant!!
    I found the very same in my 2 board debut yesterday


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 262 ✭✭RooksPawn


    Magnus wiped out Nepomniachtchi today so now there is nothing to distract us from the Irish Championship as it reaches the half-way stage.
    Here are tomorrow's pairings in order of scores:

    Tarun K (3) v Sam Collins (3.5)
    Conor O'Donnell (3) v Tom O'Gorman (3); David Fitzsimons (3) v Colm Daly 93)
    Shane Melaugh (2.5) v Killian Delaney (2.5); David Murray v Trisha K; Paul Wallace v Kavin Venkatesan; Jonathan O'Connor v Stephen Brady (also all 2.5)
    Jacob Flynn (2) v Peter Cafolla (2); Darragh Moran v Gavin Melaugh; Jonathan Peoples v Adam Collins (also all 2pts)
    Brendan Lyons (1.5) v Gerry O'Connell (1.5); Carl Jackson v Eoghan Casey; Peter Carroll v Lara Putar (also all 1.5)
    Leon Putar (1) v Alex Byrne (1); Alice O'Gorman (0.5) v Gerry MacElligott (1); Diana Mirza (0.5) v Kevin McHugh (0.5)

    All 64 games so far played are available to download from
    https://chess-results.com/PartieSuche.aspx?lan=1&id=50023&tnr=531394&art=3


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 627 ✭✭✭Retd.LoyolaCpt


    Fiona Steil Antoni commentating on the Irish today, right now here: https://www.twitch.tv/fionchetta


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 262 ✭✭RooksPawn


    Quite a good day for the ladies: although Trisha lost the others won, making it 3/4.

    Because the leaders have already played there are several downfloats – notably on boards 1 and 9.
    Also Gerry MacElligott is not paired – perhaps withdrawn or unwell?
    Alex Goss kindly plays on the bottom board as a filler to avoid a bye.

    Pairings in score order are:

    Sam Collins (4.5) v Tom O'Gorman (3.5)
    Colm Daly (4) v David Murray (3.5)
    Killian Delaney (3.5) v Conor O'Donnell (3.5)

    Stephen Brady (3.5) v David Fitzsimons (3)
    Kavin Venkatesan (3) v Tarun K (3); Jonathon Peoples v Paul Wallace; Gavin Melaugh v Jacob Flynn (also all on 3)

    Trisha K (2.5) v Jonathan O'Connor (2.5); Lara Putar (2.5) v Shane Melaugh (2.5)
    Peter Cafolla (2) v Brendan Lyons (2.5)

    Adam Collins (2) v Darragh Moran (2); Eoghan Casey v Leon Putar (2)
    Alice O'Gorman (1.5) v Carl Jackson (2)
    Gerry O'Connell (1.5) v Peter Carroll (1.5)
    Alex Byrne (1) v Diana Mirza (1.5);
    Kevin McHugh (0.5) v Alex Goss.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 383 ✭✭macelligott


    RooksPawn wrote: »
    Also Gerry MacElligott is not paired – perhaps withdrawn or unwell?
    Alex Goss kindly plays on the bottom board as a filler to avoid a bye.

    Reason: Family funeral


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 627 ✭✭✭Retd.LoyolaCpt


    Gerry back on Friday. He gave advanced notice.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 262 ✭✭RooksPawn


    Reason: Family funeral

    My commiserations. It was somewhat evident your mind was not on the game today. Good luck in the remaining rounds.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 479 ✭✭Joedryan


    Very nice game today by Killian Delaney, I am guessing this is crashing through now after 27.Rxf6!

    If not I'll eat my words but the game was played very nicely.

    Edit - there was a lot more roller coaster stuff after that!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 383 ✭✭macelligott


    RooksPawn wrote: »
    My commiserations. It was somewhat evident your mind was not on the game today. Good luck in the remaining rounds.

    I was beaten fair and square R6
    No valid excuse :-(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 262 ✭✭RooksPawn


    What a colossal day of chess today. A few comments while I wait for tomorrow's draw to be posted.
    First to finish was Gerry O'Connell whose unsound attack was crowned with success when Peter Carroll made an horrendous blunder.

    The highlight was the epic game between Killian and Conor today where all three results were possible more than once. It seems that Killian's determination and Conor's clock were the decisive factors.

    Now the question is no longer who can stop Sam but who can stop Colm? Tom O'Gorman, Killian and Sam are half a point behind him and, with three rounds to go, probably the new champion will be one of those four. There are three players on 4/6 who could still take the title but they would need to win their last three games like Conor Murphy (if I recall aright) did last year.
    Conor must be out of it now.

    Tom seems to have played most of his game very well until he faffed about in the bishop endgame (possibly very short of time?). Instead of 57...Ke4 (or other moves too) Tom played Bf3 putting his B on a square his king needed. Then 58 Bf1 would have been a tablebase draw, though probably very hard to see, coming down to a drawn QvQ+B ending in the main line. Once Sam missed that it was soon over.
    Some other games went against rating too.

    The September FIDE and ICU rating lists are going to see some big changes. After a few months where nobody played rated games, there could suddenly be major alterations in the pecking order.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 479 ✭✭Joedryan


    Early days, anything could happen yet


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,300 ✭✭✭sodacat11


    It would be funny if Spidersweb ends up winning the tournament after saying
    "This is certainly not an Irish Championships, except in name only, let alone a serious chess tournament. More like an endurance and sadomasochistic torture test".
    I think we can take it from that that should he go on to finish first that he will be Irish Champion "in name only".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 262 ✭✭RooksPawn


    sodacat11 wrote: »
    It would be funny if Spidersweb ends up winning the tournament after saying
    "This is certainly not an Irish Championships, except in name only, let alone a serious chess tournament. More like an endurance and sadomasochistic torture test".
    I think we can take it from that that should he go on to finish first that he will be Irish Champion "in name only".

    Very funny! But surely we are not supposed to guess (out loud) the identities of the anonymous posters?...

    The draw took a while to check, it seems. Sam had already played Colm and Tom, while Colm had to play one of those in the 4.5 point score group so there are several floats. This does give a chance to those on 4 and 3.5 to influence the outcome, especially if Daly does not win in round 7.

    Incidentally the young ladies made a plus score again today, which is good to see.

    Pairings for round 7 in score order.

    Daly (5) v Delaney (4.5)

    Tom O'Gorman (4.5) v Brady (4); Flynn (4) v Sam Collins (4.5)

    Tarun K (4) v O'Donnell (3.5)

    Fitzsimons (3.5) v Peoples (3.5); Wallace (3.5) v Murray (3.5);

    S. Melaugh (3.5) v Trisha K (3)

    Lyons (3) v G. Melaugh (3); Leon Putar v Venkatesan (3); O'Connor (3) v Adam Collins (3)

    Mirza (2.5) v O'Connell (2/5); Cafolla (2.5) v Alice O'Gorman (2/5)

    Jackson (2) v Lara Putar (2/5)

    Moran (2) v Casey (2);
    MacElligott (1.5) v Carroll (1.5)
    McHugh (1) v Byrne (1)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 627 ✭✭✭Retd.LoyolaCpt


    Commentary on the Irish starts today at 6.30pm with FM Henry Li joined by former Irish Champion, FM Stephen Jessel on Henry's twitch account: https://www.twitch.tv/theyellowdragoon


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 627 ✭✭✭Retd.LoyolaCpt


    Henry is live now with several games at critical points and some potentially huge results incoming - including board 1 which could change the entire tournament dynamic: https://www.twitch.tv/theyellowdragoon


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 262 ✭✭RooksPawn


    Do any of the competitors reside in Counties Kildare, Laois or Offaly?

    If so, because of the regional lockdown announced an hour ago, they will have to withdraw and not play the last two rounds (unless they are staying in Dublin until the event is over).

    Ivan had better check before making the draw for tomorrow...

    EDIT: Has there just been a one-point swing on top board?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 627 ✭✭✭Retd.LoyolaCpt


    RooksPawn wrote: »

    EDIT: Has there just been a one-point swing on top board?

    certainly looks like it


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,300 ✭✭✭sodacat11


    Lockdown here in Kildare so I will miss the final two rounds. There are roadblocks set up and I didn't want to say I'd play only to be turned back at some checkpoint. It was great to be back playing chess again in such an enjoyable tournament. Colaiste Eanna is a fantastic venue so thanks to Dave Grant and all his volunteer helpers. While I was ultimately disappointed with my result after a decent start I will take some positives from my play and spend the lockdown time between now and the City of Dublin doing some badly needed work on my openings.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 262 ✭✭RooksPawn


    Too bad four players have had to drop out. SO only 14 games today, four of them absolutely critical.

    In score order:

    Brady (4.5) v Daly (6)
    Tom O'Gorman (5) v Wallace (4.5)
    Sam Collins (4.5) V Fitzsimons (4)
    O'Donnell (4.5) v Venkatesan (4)
    Gavin Melaugh v Tarun K (both 4)
    Trisha K v Flynn (both 4)
    Alice O'Gorman (3.5) v Shane Melaugh (3.5)

    Murray (3.5) v Lara Putar (3.5)
    O'Connell v Peoples (both 3.5)
    Casey (3) v Adam Collins (3.5)
    Leon Putar (3) v Lyons (3)
    Carroll (2.5) v Diana Mirza (2.5)
    Moran (2) v McHugh (1.5)
    MacElligott (1.5) v Byrne (1.5)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,300 ✭✭✭sodacat11


    I think now with all the withdrawals for the final two rounds it just adds to what Spidersweb said about it not being a true Irish Championship.

    Quote "In other words, we want our best players to be trying to show and produce their best. This simply cannot happen under the conditions currently being suggested, just a couple of amendments would overcome that.

    Having a less than ideal Irish ch and playing conditions from what we would all like and is more usual, with most of these guideline changes,is manageable and would still retain the prestige and authenticity of a proper championship. As is, it is hard to understand any self respecting player being willing to endure this ordeal".Unquote

    In light of his comments and the ensuing Covid disruption it is only right and proper that we continue to acclaim Conor Murphy (who couldn't defend his title) as the true champion and whoever wins it this year as just someone who benefited from the absence of all the self respecting players and the attendance of some (who as Spidersweb points out) simply couldn't produce their best under the trying conditions.


  • Registered Users Posts: 31 FutureCM


    I think Conor Murphy won last year?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 262 ✭✭RooksPawn


    sodacat11 wrote: »
    I think now with all the withdrawals for the final two rounds it just adds to what Spidersweb said about it not being a true Irish Championship.

    Quote "In other words, we want our best players to be trying to show and produce their best. This simply cannot happen under the conditions currently being suggested, just a couple of amendments would overcome that.

    Having a less than ideal Irish ch and playing conditions from what we would all like and is more usual, with most of these guideline changes,is manageable and would still retain the prestige and authenticity of a proper championship. As is, it is hard to understand any self respecting player being willing to endure this ordeal".Unquote

    In light of his comments and the ensuing Covid disruption it is only right and proper that we continue to acclaim Conor Murphy (who couldn't defend his title) as the true champion and whoever wins it this year as just someone who benefited from the absence of all the self respecting players and the attendance of some (who as Spidersweb points out) simply couldn't produce their best under the trying conditions.

    Yes, Conor Murphy is the real champion and moreover I don't think the winner of this year's event should have an automatic place in an olympiad team.

    Maybe a motion to that effect should be submitted for the just-announced ICU agm to prevent future arguments on this point?

    The 2021 team is already selected but there could be a withdrawal. And, if not, the 2022/2023 olympiad is a long way from now and form could radically change.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 277 ✭✭EnPassant


    Surely the question would be "Who is the real over-50s champion?" if a player aged over 50 wins the Irish Championship?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 479 ✭✭Joedryan


    RooksPawn wrote: »
    Too bad four players have had to drop out. SO only 14 games today, four of them absolutely critical.

    In score order:

    Brady (4.5) v Daly (6)
    Tom O'Gorman (5) v Wallace (4.5)
    Sam Collins (4.5) V Fitzsimons (4)
    O'Donnell (4.5) v Venkatesan (4)
    Gavin Melaugh v Tarun K (both 4)
    Trisha K v Flynn (both 4)
    Alice O'Gorman (3.5) v Shane Melaugh (3.5)

    Murray (3.5) v Lara Putar (3.5)
    O'Connell v Peoples (both 3.5)
    Casey (3) v Adam Collins (3.5)
    Leon Putar (3) v Lyons (3)
    Carroll (2.5) v Diana Mirza (2.5)
    Moran (2) v McHugh (1.5)
    MacElligott (1.5) v Byrne (1.5)

    On chess results it says Sam is on 5.5

    What is he on?


  • Registered Users Posts: 31 FutureCM


    Joedryan wrote: »
    On chess results it says Sam is on 5.5

    What is he on?

    5.5


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 262 ✭✭RooksPawn


    Joedryan wrote: »
    On chess results it says Sam is on 5.5

    What is he on?

    Yes Sam is on 5.5, it was just a typo, writing in haste.

    Looking forward, the last round will probably see Daly playing O'Donnell and Sam playing Stephen (if Stephen doesn't lose today), given that Killian is no longer in the event and who has already met.

    Should Stephen lose, Sam could meet one of the 4-pt group if they win today to overtake Stephen. But Sam has already played Tarun and Flynn. Venkat, Gavin and Trisha would be available if they were to win but the first of those has a very tough game today and probably won't win.

    Then Tom O'Gorman needs an opponent for the last round and Fitzsimons is the most likely.
    However if Paul Wallace beats Tom today then some of these predictions will change.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 479 ✭✭Joedryan


    I would have gone for the benko reversed instead of the modern benoni reversed if i was stephen but just a personal preference i suppose. All depends how the middlegame develops.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,300 ✭✭✭sodacat11


    Looks like Stephen missed his good chance of a win with Rxe8, not quite as bad a let off as Killian's blunder yesterday. I think it must be the masks that is causing this uncharacteristic play by such good players.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 262 ✭✭RooksPawn


    Final round pairings see Sam O'Collins for once not playing on board 9; I suppose this means he has agreed to play this must-win game on a single board? If so maybe he thinks the double-board system affected his performance?
    So in board order, with cumulative scores:

    Daly (6.5) v O'Donnell (5.5)
    Brady (5) v Sam Collins (6.5)
    S. Melaugh (4.5) v Tom O'Gorman (6)
    Tarun K (5) v Murray (4.5)
    Fitzsimons (4.5) v Flynn (4.5)
    Adam COllins (4.5) v Trisha K (4.5)
    Wallace (4.5) v O'Connell (4.5)
    Venkatesan (4) v G. Melaugh (4)
    Peoples (3.5) v Leon Putar (4)
    Lara Putar (3.5) v Alice O'Gorman (3.5)
    Lyons (3) v Carroll (3.5)
    Byrne (2.5) v Casey (3)
    Mirza (2.5) v Moran (3)
    Jackson (2.5) v MacElligott (1.5/7)

    So there are four players who could win or share the title.
    Odds somewhat favour Daly as he is the only one of them to have the White pieces and luck seems to be on his side.
    He has scored 1.5 points from two probably lost positions in the last two rounds, though today White probably missed only one clear-cut chance. At move 24, according to the engine, Brady should have played 24 Rxe8+! Kxe8 25 Bxf7+ forcing Kd7 and then 26 Bxg6 with two pawns and a very strong position for the exchange.
    Tom O'Gorman, though, has a sporting chance of being joint champion since on paper he has an easier pairing than his rivals.

    The round should make exciting viewing and remember the games start at 1230.


  • Registered Users Posts: 271 ✭✭zeitnot


    RooksPawn wrote: »
    So there are four players who could win or share the title.
    ...
    Tom O'Gorman, though, has a sporting chance of being joint champion

    Nobody can share the title or be joint champion--change in system starting with the 2018 championship. See https://www.icu.ie/articles/670, fourth section down.

    The title goes by the head-to-head results, and if those don't decide, then a 2-game rapid playoff match between two players, chosen via the head-to-head results.

    In the present case, the possible ties and outcomes are (I think!--corrections welcome):

    Collins, Daly tie -> playoff
    Collins, O'Gorman tie -> O'Gorman champion
    Collins, Daly, O'Gorman tie -> O'Gorman champion
    Collins, Daly, O'Donnell tie -> Collins champion
    Daly, O'Gorman tie -> playoff

    One implication is that while Conor O'Donnell has a chance of finishing equal first, he is out of the running for the title, even via a playoff.


  • Registered Users Posts: 271 ✭✭zeitnot


    ... and one more possibility

    Collins, Daly, O'Donnell, O'Gorman tie -> O'Gorman champion


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 479 ✭✭Joedryan


    zeitnot wrote: »
    Nobody can share the title or be joint champion--change in system starting with the 2018 championship. See https://www.icu.ie/articles/670, fourth section down.

    The title goes by the head-to-head results, and if those don't decide, then a 2-game rapid playoff match between two players, chosen via the head-to-head results.

    In the present case, the possible ties and outcomes are (I think!--corrections welcome):

    Collins, Daly tie -> playoff
    Collins, O'Gorman tie -> O'Gorman champion
    Collins, Daly, O'Gorman tie -> O'Gorman champion
    Collins, Daly, O'Donnell tie -> Collins champion
    Daly, O'Gorman tie -> playoff

    One implication is that while Conor O'Donnell has a chance of finishing equal first, he is out of the running for the title, even via a playoff.

    Interesting. It was always the case that two players shared the title.

    When was this changed?

    My own opinion if it aint broke dont try to fix it.

    Edit . Well obviously 2018. But was this approved by the membership?

    Seems a strange and unnecessary addition


  • Registered Users Posts: 271 ✭✭zeitnot


    Joedryan wrote: »
    Interesting. It was always the case that two players shared the title.

    When was this changed?

    My own opinion if it aint broke dont try to fix it.

    2018. In place for the 2018 championship, made permanent at the 2018 AGM for all Irish championships.

    Like the open versus closed debate, and the debate over minimum rating requirements, it's one of those things that has no right or wrong answer. For myself, having a shared title was a bit broken.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 479 ✭✭Joedryan


    zeitnot wrote: »
    2018. In place for the 2018 championship, made permanent at the 2018 AGM for all Irish championships.

    Like the open versus closed debate, and the debate over minimum rating requirements, it's one of those things that has no right or wrong answer. For myself, having a shared title was a bit broken.

    Shared title was perfect imo. It never happened with me as it happened but there was the year i won with 8.5 out of 9 and fully expected Stephen to also get 8.5 but as it happened Tony Fox held him to a draw. To expect either of us to go to a playoff in those circumstances would be ludicrous imo.

    The system has stood the test of time. Leave it be

    Edit . But apparently its been changed. First I heard of it. Sounds very dodgy to my point of view


  • Registered Users Posts: 271 ✭✭zeitnot


    Joedryan wrote: »
    Shared title was perfect imo. It never happened with me as it happened but there was the year i won with 8.5 out of 9 and fully expected Stephen to also get 8.5 but as it happened Tony Fox held him to a draw. To expect either of us to go to a playoff in those circumstances would be ludicrous imo.

    The system has stood the test of time. Leave it be

    Edit . But apparently its been changed. First I heard of it. Sounds very dodgy to my point of view

    Ah, now, Joe, this system was in place last year! You're surely not suggesting you took part in the championship last year without reading the terms and conditions fully? I refuse to believe that.

    As to the merits, shared championships are the minority even in chess events, and are almost unknown in other competitive endeavours. We don't have shared English Premier Leagues, world snooker championships, Wimbledons, or All-Ireland hurling Championships. And we don't have joint world chess champions, ever. Not even joint world correspondence chess champions.

    Even the Irish championship didn't allow that originally. (And only got into it by accident.) It's not a bit dodgy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 479 ✭✭Joedryan


    zeitnot wrote: »
    Ah, now, Joe, this system was in place last year! You're surely not suggesting you took part in the championship last year without reading the terms and conditions fully? I refuse to believe that.

    As to the merits, shared championships are the minority even in chess events, and are almost unknown in other competitive endeavours. We don't have shared English Premier Leagues, world snooker championships, Wimbledons, or All-Ireland hurling Championships. And we don't have joint world chess champions, ever. Not even joint world correspondence chess champions.

    Even the Irish championship didn't allow that originally. (And only got into it by accident.) It's not a bit dodgy.

    You may be right. I certainly was unaware last year. A playoff is all very unsatisfactory in my view. A tie break even more so. Might as well toss a coin. I stand by my opinion! Aint broke dont fix.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,300 ✭✭✭sodacat11


    Joedryan wrote: »
    You may be right. I certainly was unaware last year. A playoff is all very unsatisfactory in my view. A tie break even more so. Might as well toss a coin. I stand by my opinion! Aint broke dont fix.

    I agree about play offs and tie breaks. Blitz is no way to decide a classical chess tournament and with tie breaks it is just down to luck because a player has no control over who he/she plays or how his opponents score in other games. Deciding a tie on the individual result is also unfair as it favours the player with the white pieces. Also one player may have had five whites in the tournament compared to their rivals having five blacks.
    In 2012 I was joint leader going into the last round with four others. I made it perfectly clear before the final game that in the event of me tying for the title I would not be taking part in any play offs. I would have tied the title on merit had I won so why should I have jeopardized that by playing blitz when I never play in any blitz or rapid tournaments? Also blitz greatly favours the younger players.
    I don't see what is wrong with the title being shared by any amount of people. It wouldn't diminish the title in the least for the people involved and really it has feck all to do with anyone else.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,300 ✭✭✭sodacat11


    zeitnot wrote: »
    Ah, now, Joe, this system was in place last year! You're surely not suggesting you took part in the championship last year without reading the terms and conditions fully? I refuse to believe that.

    As to the merits, shared championships are the minority even in chess events, and are almost unknown in other competitive endeavours. We don't have shared English Premier Leagues, world snooker championships, Wimbledons, or All-Ireland hurling Championships. And we don't have joint world chess champions, ever. Not even joint world correspondence chess champions.

    Even the Irish championship didn't allow that originally. (And only got into it by accident.) It's not a bit dodgy.
    You also don't have draws in snooker or tennis . Mostly the need for "A champion" is for commercial reasons and to satisfy the public. If after a long gruelling event a few players are tied then it is only right that they should share the honour and the title. If two or three players dead heated in the Olympic marathon would you have them play off in a fifty metre sprint or decide who the winner is on who covered the last five kilometres in the quickest time? It would be ridiculous that if Conor O'Donnell beats Daly today with Black and ties first that he cannot win the title.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 80 ✭✭corkcitychess


    I make Colm slight favourite to be Irish champion going into the last round. He has White against O'Donnell....very good chance of winning whereas Brady has white against Collins.

    forget the ratings...Collins has the much more difficult pairing with the black pieces.

    Highly likely that his game will be a c3 Sicilian where Brady has masses of experience. I actually predict Brady will draw but maybe win (not lose).


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 7,265 Mod ✭✭✭✭cdeb


    sodacat11 wrote: »
    I don't see what is wrong with the title being shared by any amount of people. It wouldn't diminish the title in the least for the people involved and really it has feck all to do with anyone else.
    I'd echo this alright.

    Though if it was passed at AGM, I guess at least it's clear and above-board where everyone stands today.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29 DancingSpaniel


    I predict neither Colm nor Stephen will win.

    I'd predict Conor to win and Stephen-Sam to be a draw.

    One other prediction: I probably have it wrong ��


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 277 ✭✭EnPassant


    An armageddon blitz play-off using the 2-board system might be interesting ...

    It doesn't apply this year, but if 3 players tied for first, with all 3 having drawn against each other, then the rules say that the 2 players to play in the play-off can be chosen by drawing lots. This makes absolutely no sense - what is the point of randomly selecting 2 out of 3 players for a playoff?

    Is the purpose of the playoff to determine who gets the Olympiad place? If so, why not have the Championship shared, and have a playoff specifically for any non-monetary benefits of being champion.

    Or why not have a simple tie-break based on the rating performance of the players in the tournament? This would at least have the benefit of being based on the players' performance during the event and would avoid using any quicker time-controls.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,300 ✭✭✭sodacat11


    Even in a strange year like this one (where, according to Spidersweb no self respecting players are playing, players cannot possibly give their best and it is a championship in name only) the Irish Championship with its generous time control, excellent playing conditions, limited entry, prestige and great history is a very special and unique tournament on our calendar and one which participants take very seriously. It is nine long days of attrition, no opponent is a pushover and most are very well prepared for each game. Every half point has to be earned and winning games is not easy even for the very best. Anyone who emerges at the end of the nine days as clear or even shared leader then fully deserves to be Irish Champion. If a three or four way tie proves to be an insurmountable task for the trophy engraver then tough.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 262 ✭✭RooksPawn


    I see Sam is playing on double boards (board 9) after all, though his game was originally listed as board 2.

    AND it isn't a 2 c3 Sicilian. Stephen opened 1 Nf3 so it's a sort of King's Indian Attack.
    Daly-O'Donnell opened 1 d4 e6 and Daly seems to be taking his time on move 2 (or else the feed isn't working).
    Tom O'Gorman's game is a symmetrical English.

    Long dour battles in prospect.

    If you want some early action to watch, Peoples v Leon Putar looks a good candidate.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 7,265 Mod ✭✭✭✭cdeb


    Tom doing his side of the bargain anyway.

    Stephen with a decent edge over Sam, but a long way to go before it's decisive. Conor v Colm still quite level, but you can imagine neither will be thinking of draw offers for a while yet.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 7,265 Mod ✭✭✭✭cdeb


    And Tom has just won in fact. So he takes the lead on 7/9 and will win outright if Conor and Stephen both win. Computer now giving Stephen a big lead over Sam (+4 after move 25), but the chess24 computer is notoriously crap, so wouldn't necessarily trust that. Must have a look at the position.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement