Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

The Links Thread

1246765

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 492 ✭✭TrapperChamonix


    geeksauce wrote: »
    Yes and your point.

    That is my opinion, I feel that links is a true test, and yes I prefer it to walking around a parklands course (or glorified field) again my opinion.

    If you are a parkland course you might be upset by me saying that but someone who plays a parkland course shouldn't be. This is a thread about links golf, so chances are the posters here would have an affinity for it and would prefer it to Parklands Golf, if that upsets you maybe this isn't the thread for you.

    Perhaps I should have left it to Benny Cake to answer your question, but on reading your post I would have agreed with all but the 2 quotes I highlighted. I didn't think it was necessary to put down parkland courses in order to sing the praises of links golf. That is why I thought it was a bit condescending. Maybe I'm wrong but hey that's just my opinion.
    I take your point that it is a thread called Links, but I don't think that excludes anyone else from becoming involved in the discussion. In particular I would hope that people would read this thread and be encouraged to try more links golf as it is so unique.
    Anyway that's my 2 cents


    p.s. I play all ( 95%+) of my golf on a links.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,854 ✭✭✭alxmorgan


    geeksauce wrote: »
    Yes and your point.

    That is my opinion, I feel that links is a true test, and yes I prefer it to walking around a parklands course (or glorified field) again my opinion.

    If you are a parkland course you might be upset by me saying that but someone who plays a parkland course shouldn't be. This is a thread about links golf, so chances are the posters here would have an affinity for it and would prefer it to Parklands Golf, if that upsets you maybe this isn't the thread for you.

    The use of the term glorified field does not help your case. Adare, Mount Juliet = glorified fields ? I don't think so

    It's the equivalent of someone calling a links a glorified beach


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 826 ✭✭✭geeksauce


    Perhaps I should have left it to Benny Cake to answer your question, but on reading your post I would have agreed with all but the 2 quotes I highlighted. I didn't think it was necessary to put down parkland courses in order to sing the praises of links golf. That is why I thought it was a bit condescending. Maybe I'm wrong but hey that's just my opinion.
    I take your point that it is a thread called Links, but I don't think that excludes anyone else from becoming involved in the discussion. In particular I would hope that people would read this thread and be encouraged to try more links golf as it is so unique.
    Anyway that's my 2 cents


    p.s. I play all ( 95%+) of my golf on a links.

    Maybe I am a bit too biased when it comes to Links courses and therefore was a bit OTT in my assessment of Parklands courses. It's not that I don't like them I just much prefer the links courses.

    I also don't think anyone should be excluded from the thread I simply meant that given the nature of thread chances are there will be the odd post declaring links courses to be far superior than parkland courses and if this is likely to cause offence then reading the thread on the greatness of links courses may not be the best idea.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 826 ✭✭✭geeksauce


    alxmorgan wrote: »
    The use of the term glorified field does not help your case. Adare, Mount Juliet = glorified fields ? I don't think so

    It's the equivalent of someone calling a links a glorified beach

    Well if someone decides to call a links a glorified beach then that's fine by me I don't find it to be condescending in any way shape or form, I accept that this is simply their opinion of links courses.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,034 ✭✭✭Loire


    That last stretch - invariably into the wind - is to remind you that at 1 and towards 10 you felt this course is easy.

    But a very hard finish.

    Never a truer word spoken! I remember playing a driver, some-sort-of-wood and a 4 iron to a par 5...was a little short but got up&down for Battle of the Somme-like par.

    A rake of balls with my mark on them still out there I'd imagine


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,333 ✭✭✭✭PARlance


    Should I set up a Glorified Field Thread? :D

    I actually though Geeks post was a good one but I hadn't noticed the glorified field bit. The bit about the parkland guy struggling is a bit harsh too.
    (Some links guys say they struggle to hit off soggy fairways, or that they struggle to get pin high as they are so used to getting a bit of bounce)

    But apart from those two things that might cause offence, I thought it was a good post :P

    I always loved links and preferred it over parkland, but I have played mostly links since Jan and I have to say the divide is getting greater.
    Completely enjoyed Portunma the last day but there's just something special about links, there always has been, and it's getting better every time I play them.

    Comparing a links to a parkland at this time of year is a bit unfair, I'll be playing a lot more fields in the summer hopefully ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,958 ✭✭✭✭FixdePitchmark


    Ahh lads - we said that this is not the Links versus Parkland Thread :)

    Love Glorified Beach. :p:D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,144 ✭✭✭Benny Cake


    geeksauce wrote: »
    What is condescending about it, or is that a question, I see the question mark but am confused whether you are making a statement or asking a question?:confused:
    "Links is the true test, ........"
    ".............Beats walking round a glorified field any day."

    Not to forget the following "gem"....
    geeksauce wrote: »
    . I can go to a parkland course and compete with members that play them week in week out, get the same members onto a links course and watch them try flop shots from 2 yards off the green, cracks me up every time.
    .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,421 ✭✭✭✭Rikand


    That was the line that really got me Benny!

    Thanks for that.


    (goes back to staying out of the thread)


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,076 ✭✭✭bustercherry


    Benny Cake wrote: »
    Not to forget the following "gem"....

    Agreed, certainly ludicrous coming from an 18 handicapper ;)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 54 ✭✭NorfolkEnchants


    That picture from Kevin of Enniscrone is just epic, love that course.

    Will be home soon to play Carne, Strandhill, Enniscrone and The European, all in the space of a week, with another round in Mt Juliet thrown in for good measure. That Enniscrone picture has me excited, I seriously can't wait.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,958 ✭✭✭✭FixdePitchmark


    Lads played Portmarnock Links today.

    A great course.

    It starts uncertain - not sure if it is a links at all. But once you hit 7-8-9 , you hit a true links.
    The holes have great variety and club demand.

    The greens are often raised and a club less can hit before green and roll on. An argument could be madef that is is too reliant on chance.

    At 18 you hear the sea , but never see it.

    A great course - a Royal Dublin - with more to it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 826 ✭✭✭geeksauce


    Benny Cake wrote: »
    Not to forget the following "gem"....

    And what is wrong with saying that, I have a friend who I play with on a Parkland course and we are usually pretty close score wise, when he comes to the links he tries the shots he uses on the parkland around the greens which have no chance of working and we laugh about it. He laughs about it too, like I said cracks me up.

    I am glad you thought it was a gem nice to be appreciated, cheers Benny.:pac:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 826 ✭✭✭geeksauce


    Agreed, certainly ludicrous coming from an 18 handicapper ;)

    Who is an 18 handicapper now?

    Oh and to quote Benny "condescending much"!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,331 ✭✭✭mike12


    That picture from Kevin of Enniscrone is just epic, love that course.

    Will be home soon to play Carne, Strandhill, Enniscrone and The European, all in the space of a week, with another round in Mt Juliet thrown in for good measure. That Enniscrone picture has me excited, I seriously can't wait.
    It is a roller coaster of Fun, lots of Dunes at the start 5 flat holes in the middle before the par 3 then the 2 short par 4's play to where you can see for both, actually that goes for almost all of the course you will do fine around it playing to where you can see.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,331 ✭✭✭the lawman


    Played The Island today and man that's some test of golf. Long and true.

    Need to really plan your shots. No flops or you're toast. Course is in great shape and love to play it on a warm sunny day. One of the finest courses you'll play in Dublin I'd say.

    87% FIR and finished with same ball started with so that was pleasing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,958 ✭✭✭✭FixdePitchmark


    the lawman wrote: »
    Played The Island today and man that's some test of golf. Long and true.

    Need to really plan your shots. No flops or you're toast. Course is in great shape and love to play it on a warm sunny day. One of the finest courses you'll play in Dublin I'd say.

    87% FIR and finished with same ball started with so that was pleasing.

    The is fantastic going for your first time there - well done. Was wild enough early this morning. Was next door practising looking in - with envy.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 492 ✭✭TrapperChamonix


    the lawman wrote: »
    87% FIR and finished with same ball started with so that was pleasing.

    Anytime you finish with the same ball you started is a good day


  • Registered Users Posts: 249 ✭✭dwd


    Was down in the European Club myself this morning for the first time. It's a fantastic track, definitely the best links course I've yet to play and probably the best course I've played full stop. I really have to get down there during the summer to see it at it's best, it was in really good nick today but there was a few bits of casual water from the heavy rain over the last couple of days. There are just so many good holes on it, loved the stretch along the coast and the 2 extra holes are a nice touch as well, the second extra par 3 being my favorite. Also, I really have to mention the guy in the pro shop, I didn't get his name but he was a true gent and really looked after me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,034 ✭✭✭Loire


    the lawman wrote: »
    87% FIR

    Fair play:cool: Don't think I'd manage that with a 7 iron off every tee :p


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 661 ✭✭✭Norfolk Enchants_


    Loire wrote: »
    Fair play:cool: Don't think I'd manage that with a 7 iron off every tee :p
    FIR on it's own is a pointless stat, GIR is a much better indicator of how you have actually played tee to green (which is the object of the game), e.g you could have 0% FIR and still have 100% GIR, but if you are hitting 87% FIR and not getting a return of better than 72% GIR then you need to look at your game because something is wrong.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,331 ✭✭✭the lawman


    FIR on it's own is a pointless stat, GIR is a much better indicator of how you have actually played tee to green (which is the object of the game), e.g you could have 0% FIR and still have 100% GIR, but if you are hitting 87% FIR and not getting a return of better than 72% GIR then you need to look at your game because something is wrong.

    Haha. Can you be my coach?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 661 ✭✭✭Norfolk Enchants_


    the lawman wrote: »
    Haha. Can you be my coach?
    Haha, thanks but no thanks, there wouldn't be much point.
    Quick question for you though which would you prefer to have, a 100% FIR and 0% GIR or vice versa?, I'll guess you'd prefer the former.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,331 ✭✭✭the lawman


    Haha, thanks but no thanks, there wouldn't be much point.
    Quick question for you though which would you prefer to have, a 100% FIR and 0% GIR or vice versa?, I'll guess you'd prefer the former.

    As much as this conversation sounds really constructive and positive I think I might just leave it. Best of luck though fella.


  • Registered Users Posts: 233 ✭✭yettie1701


    Played Arklow today. It was my first time playing here and was really looking forward to it. I have to say I was a little dissapointed. I was expecting more. The par 3s were great except one new looking hole over a lake on the back nine. Not really linksy at all. But the rest didn't do it for me. The quarry and industrial estate are not what you would expect around a links either. The overall condition of the place was poor enough I thought. Wouldn't be in a hurry to play it again. I must say the staff there in the office are some of the friendliest welcoming people I've come across and a huge thumbs up for that. Sorry if I offend anybody by my comments but its just my opinion


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 589 ✭✭✭Dealerz


    Arklow gc reminds me of rush gc for some reason.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,695 ✭✭✭ForeRight


    What's laytown like lads?

    Playing it in a couple of weeks


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,958 ✭✭✭✭FixdePitchmark


    ForeRight wrote: »
    What's laytown like lads?

    Playing it in a couple of weeks

    I've only 2 to do on east coast This above and Royaler.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,695 ✭✭✭ForeRight


    I've only 2 to do on east coast This above and Royaler.



    Royaler county down?

    It's no European


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,958 ✭✭✭✭FixdePitchmark


    ForeRight wrote: »
    Royaler county down?

    It's no European

    No Dublin.

    I think - I'd put County Down ahead of European.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,695 ✭✭✭ForeRight


    No Dublin.

    I think - I'd put County Down ahead of European.



    I've never played royal Dublin myself.

    I'd prefer the European purely on the basis that there are so little blind shots in the European compared to RCD


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,958 ✭✭✭✭FixdePitchmark


    ForeRight wrote: »
    I've never played royal Dublin myself.

    I'd prefer the European purely on the basis that there are so little blind shots in the European compared to RCD

    I like blind holes - a bit odd like that.

    Also not a fan of the sleepers - but maybe another go needed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,695 ✭✭✭ForeRight


    I like blind holes - a bit odd like that.

    Also not a fan of the sleepers - but maybe another go needed.



    The sleepers are a killer no doubt but just stay away from them and you're grand ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,958 ✭✭✭✭FixdePitchmark


    ForeRight wrote: »
    The sleepers are a killer no doubt but just stay away from them and you're grand ;)

    but for me - if you look at most bunkers - they have a slope that makes the ball roll a fair bit - it makes it go to a reasonable position - that you may have to play a good bunker shot to get out. But on some of the bunkers in The European - you fall straight down along a piece of wood - you end up at the piece of wood. A bunker shot becomes unplayable - that to me is not golf.

    Maybe I was unlucky and it happened to be the first bunker I went into. I was going well killed my momentum.

    A piece of wood to me is not a natural piece of a golf course - ok if it is supporting a drain - but to me it goes against my idea of a bunker, a golf club can not swing into a sleeper.

    It is a nice feature visually - but - there are too many of them and a bunker shot , should be a bunker shot.

    Saying don't go into a bunker in a links - is not on. Bunkers are the defence system of a links - I can get out of most bunkers - would have been a good bunker player in the past - but I haven't the ability to swing at something designed to support rolling stock .

    Will review after a few visits.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,034 ✭✭✭Loire


    FIR on it's own is a pointless stat.

    Tell that to Fred Funk..


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,695 ✭✭✭ForeRight


    I won't disagree, they are not ideal that's for sure.

    I've never been unfortunate enough to be sitting against one although I have been close to them where by I haven't been able to complete a swing. The times I was close to them I just punched the ball against them at anagle that it wouldn't bounce back against me and the angie of the sleeper has taken the ball out no problem for me.
    Obviously no chance of going at a green if in a fairway one.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,958 ✭✭✭✭FixdePitchmark


    ForeRight wrote: »
    I won't disagree, they are not ideal that's for sure.

    I've never been unfortunate enough to be sitting against one although I have been close to them where by I haven't been able to complete a swing. The times I was close to them I just punched the ball against them at anagle that it wouldn't bounce back against me and the angie of the sleeper has taken the ball out no problem for me.
    Obviously no chance of going at a green if in a fairway one.

    I think I was maybe unlucky - but said to the lads - that the last time I had 4 shots in a bunker - I was about 8 on a pitch and putt course.

    In saying that - my bunker shots were poor at the time - had totally forgotten how to play bunker shots - but that is sorted now - all in the bounce.


  • Registered Users Posts: 233 ✭✭yettie1701


    ForeRight wrote: »
    What's laytown like lads?

    Playing it in a couple of weeks

    I played it only once and thought it was average enough. Couple of fairways cross which I don't like some might think its quirky. For me it's well worth playing but wouldn't be in a mad rush back to it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 492 ✭✭TrapperChamonix


    ForeRight wrote: »
    What's laytown like lads?

    Playing it in a couple of weeks

    On the face of it, suffers in comparison to its near neighbour across the river. Not as long and a bit cramped. However it's always hard to score on it. Small greens and penal (summer) rough pose a tough challenge. It'll certainly test your up and down skills.
    When Jean van der Veldt was asked about the penal rough in Carnoustie ( where there were accusations that the R&A had used fertiliser on it) he replied that he had spent the previous week practicing in Bettystown where it was even worse. Had he not blown it at the last he would have credited his win to his preparation to that week in Bettystown.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 661 ✭✭✭Norfolk Enchants_


    the lawman wrote: »
    As much as this conversation sounds really constructive and positive I think I might just leave it. Best of luck though fella.
    That's grand so, glad you agree with me. All good hear fella.
    Loire wrote: »
    Tell that to Fred Funk..
    Why? I'm sure he's already aware of the relevance of GIR over FIR.
    but for me - if you look at most bunkers - they have a slope that makes the ball roll a fair bit - it makes it go to a reasonable position - that you may have to play a good bunker shot to get out. But on some of the bunkers in The European - you fall straight down along a piece of wood - you end up at the piece of wood. A bunker shot becomes unplayable - that to me is not golf.

    Maybe I was unlucky and it happened to be the first bunker I went into. I was going well killed my momentum.

    A piece of wood to me is not a natural piece of a golf course - ok if it is supporting a drain - but to me it goes against my idea of a bunker, a golf club can not swing into a sleeper.

    It is a nice feature visually - but - there are too many of them and a bunker shot , should be a bunker shot.

    Saying don't go into a bunker in a links - is not on. Bunkers are the defence system of a links - I can get out of most bunkers - would have been a good bunker player in the past - but I haven't the ability to swing at something designed to support rolling stock .

    Will review after a few visits.
    Spot on Fix have to agree with there, very unlike Ruddy to get it so wrong in relation to the sleepers in bunkers especially when he seems to have got everything else so right.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,331 ✭✭✭the lawman


    It's actually 'here'.


  • Registered Users Posts: 249 ✭✭dwd


    Regarding the bunkers in the European Club, I actually though they looked good and even though I was in enough of them and had no problems, I really think I would preferred it if they were traditional sod walls, especially on the fairway bunkers, I was always half scared I would thin one and kill myself with the rebound :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,331 ✭✭✭the lawman


    Gonna try attach some pics of the Island because, why not.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,331 ✭✭✭the lawman


    Another


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,695 ✭✭✭ForeRight


    I'd love to play that place. It looks fabulous


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,331 ✭✭✭the lawman


    Last one


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,331 ✭✭✭mike12


    Played Corballis on Saturday they had a open on scored 30 points so one of my better rounds around there. Greens were in good condition but lots of divots in the areas where the ball gathers but overall in good condition.
    If i never played a comp in Corballis i'd be 13 .1's better off handicap wise. Funny thing i have played the same amount of comps in Portmarnock and am -.5 for those.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 589 ✭✭✭Dealerz


    What is it about Corballis? It's short, it has a heap of par 3s but people struggle to score (except fix!)?


  • Registered Users Posts: 176 ✭✭Carpo86


    Dealerz wrote: »
    What is it about Corballis? It's short, it has a heap of par 3s but people struggle to score (except fix!)?

    Missing the fairway/green= never seeing your ball again.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,958 ✭✭✭✭FixdePitchmark


    Yes divots a disaster. You will be in 3 on a round. (on average). It is to do with the bumps and landing zones.

    It is just my home course (sort of) and know what club to hit off a tee. That is all - just requires experience there. But it is almost impossible to play the place without a blow up - examples are 2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9. 11-12-13-14-17.
    All the holes there can end up in 6-7-8-9.
    How many course have that many holes that can do that , and some are only 100 yards.
    I've never had a round without a treble or more. I will one day. Hope to par it one day.

    It is just hard to convince people to hit a 9 iron on 2.
    A 6 or 7 on 5
    A 7 or 8 on 7

    That 7 and 8 are disasters waiting to happen

    That you do not go for any of the holes that you think you should.

    It just takes incredible discipline - that I don't have , but I have been tortured into submission.

    The only hole I make a mistake on now is 3. I go for it every time - make it 1 in 4.
    Ends in par , birdie or 7 - 8.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement