Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Oscars 2018

24

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,971 ✭✭✭_Dara_


    No, only nine up for Best Film.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,680 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sad Professor


    JP Liz V1 wrote: »
    Did Mudbound get a cinema release?

    Just a 1 week Oscar-qualifying run in NY and LA.


  • Administrators, Computer Games Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 32,395 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Mickeroo


    I was about to give out stink that The Red Turtle and my Life as a Courgette were beaten to a best animated feature nomination by The boss Baby and Ferdinand then I saw they were nominated last year :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,060 ✭✭✭Sexual Chocolate


    Meryl Streep again ?

    As great as an actor he is, part of me thinks Christopher Plummer nomination is just as much of a dig at Kevin Spacey from the academy.

    Get Out was a big surprise for any nomination let alone Best Picture. Good film but Oscar worthy didnt enter my mind at all when I went to see it !


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,337 ✭✭✭Wombatman


    _Dara_ wrote: »
    No, only nine up for Best Film.

    I wonder will La La Land win it again.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,971 ✭✭✭_Dara_


    Meryl Streep again ?

    As great as an actor he is, part of me thinks Christopher Plummer nomination is just as much of a dig at Kevin Spacey from the academy.

    Get Out was a big surprise for any nomination let alone Best Picture. Good film but Oscar worthy didnt enter my mind at all when I went to see it !

    On that note, I'm surprised at Daniel Kaluuya getting nominated. Maybe it's just because 'Get Out' was overall a disappointment to me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 87,504 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    Meryl Streep again ?

    As great as an actor he is, part of me thinks Christopher Plummer nomination is just as much of a dig at Kevin Spacey from the academy.

    Get Out was a big surprise for any nomination let alone Best Picture. Good film but Oscar worthy didnt enter my mind at all when I went to see it !

    I think Streep could pick her nose in a one scene cameo and still get nominated :P

    Did Armie Hammer calling out Casey Affleck ruin his nomination chance?


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 23,213 Mod ✭✭✭✭Kiith


    Wombatman wrote: »
    Visual Effects
    Blade Runner 2049
    Guardians of the Galway
    Kong: Skull Island
    War for the planet of the Apes

    The clear front runner :P


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,680 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sad Professor


    JP Liz V1 wrote: »
    I think Streep could pick her nose in a one scene cameo and still get nominated :P

    Did Armie Hammer calling out Casey Affleck ruin his nomination chance?

    Doubtful. I'm pretty sure he apologised to Affleck for that anyway. Chalamet threw Woody Allen under a bus and said he'd do it again and it didn't hurt him (yet).


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,480 ✭✭✭MfMan


    To reiterate, bit disappointed for Jeremy Renner (Wind River), and the film in general. Very skillful. Denzel Washington, who tends to auto-pilot through every movie, seems to be the male Streep.


  • Registered Users Posts: 890 ✭✭✭El Duda


    No surprises that Detroit, a film about how awful white people are, is getting overlooked in all areas.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,680 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sad Professor


    A few firsts:

    - Nolan's first nomination
    - Johnny Greenwood's first nomination
    - First woman nominated for Best Cinematographer
    - First screenplay nomination for a superhero film?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,973 ✭✭✭ShagNastii


    Get Out and Greta Gerwig are big prices on Paddy Power.

    Would it be an idea to throw on a bet? I have a feeling the GGs was only the start of Hollywood's back patting love in.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,236 ✭✭✭Decuc500


    Get Out was a big surprise for any nomination let alone Best Picture. Good film but Oscar worthy didnt enter my mind at all when I went to see it !

    It's a well written horror movie, clever and fun and nicely played by the cast. I really liked it. I also saw 3 or 4 other horror films at that high standard last year.

    But it's also a timely and topical movie for American audiences so that's the reason for the fuss. The cynical part of me says Oscar has to be seen to do the right thing here.


  • Administrators, Computer Games Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 32,395 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Mickeroo


    A few firsts:

    - Nolan's first nomination
    - Johnny Greenwood's first nomination
    - First woman nominated for Best Cinematographer
    - First screenplay nomination for a superhero film?

    This is Nolan's first? Hadn't realised that at all. Knew about Logan being the first super hero screenplay nom alright, delighted to see it.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,971 ✭✭✭_Dara_


    A few firsts:

    - Nolan's first nomination

    For Best Director, you mean? He's been nominated for Screenplay twice before.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 87,504 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    Mickeroo wrote: »
    This is Nolan's first? Hadn't realised that at all. Knew about Logan being the first super hero screenplay nom alright, delighted to see it.

    It is his first for directing, he was nominated for screenplay before


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,323 ✭✭✭p to the e


    MfMan wrote: »
    Denzel Washington, who tends to auto-pilot through every movie, seems to be the male Streep.
    61788038.jpg


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,611 ✭✭✭david75


    13 nominations for the Shape of water...including the big ones. That’s really weird. I mean it’s good but not brilliant.
    I can see Get Out claiming everything it’s uo for cos yknow, politics.

    But I hope against hope that Call me by your name takes it. Such a beautiful film.

    Can’t see anyone touching Oldman in best actor. Be a real shocker if he didn’t win it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,974 ✭✭✭Chris_Heilong


    There is no way Get Out should be nominated, it was a total B movie with a silly scifi ending, for me it was good(for a B movie) but not oscar worthy.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 87,504 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    I think after Portman and Streisand's comment on female directors at the Globes that may help Gerwig with the nomination and potential win


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,045 ✭✭✭Ohmeha


    I haven't see all of the oscar nominated movies but I really don't get this oscar love in for Get Out. I liked the movie and Daniel Kaluuya gave a good breakthrough performance but neither are nomination worthy think it smacks a bit of ticking the diversity box.

    I think The Disaster Artist and Franco were always going to get snubbed by 'The Academy' for a comedy movie like that irrespective of his 'allegations'

    Armie Hammer's performance in Call Me by Your Name was as important and exceptional as Timothée Chalamet in making that wonderful movie what it was so that's a serious snub for not receiving a Best Supporting Actor nomination. I liked Christopher Plummer performance but that nomination appears to a pat on the back for taking Spacey's role at short notice.

    The Florida Project should have got a best picture nomination that's another snub I don't understand when Darkest Hour and Lady Bird are receiving questionable reviews


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,611 ✭✭✭david75


    if I was involved with Get Out and we won, I’d be pissed off. It literally is tokenism to suit the current political climate. It’s a really interesting movie. It is not best picture worthy in any way. It would be a hollow victory.

    Same for Saoirse. She’s been in far better films and way more worthy roles. If she wins for this (she won’t but..) I think she’ll be bummed out. .


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,971 ✭✭✭_Dara_


    david75 wrote: »
    if I was involved with Get Out and we won, I’d be pissed off. It literally is tokenism to suit the current political climate. It’s a really interesting movie. It is not best picture worthy in any way. It would be a hollow victory.

    Same for Saoirse. She’s been in far better films and way more worthy roles. If she wins for this (she won’t but..) I think she’ll be bummed out. .

    It’s not Saoirse’s year to win. She’s grand, I see her having a great career. She’ll get one eventually.

    As for ‘Get Out’, I was a tad disappointed by it but it is very highly regarded. I don’t think it’s fair to suggest that it’s only doing well because of the current political climate. It certainly makes a statement but the quality is there to back it up. Nice to see a not totally earnest, worthy film be nominated in the Best Film category. And a horror to boot.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,971 ✭✭✭_Dara_


    Having said that, I didn’t think that Daniel Kalauuya’s performance was that strong and certainly not worthy of a Best Actor nomination.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,971 ✭✭✭_Dara_


    And lastly, the Oscars have always been a byword for mediocrity. Why are people surprised at great films being snubbed? Sometimes great films are nominated, sometimes they win. Sometimes. Usually not though. The Academy generally can’t past earnest, stodgy fare. It was literally ever thus. Pick five years at random since the awards were given out. Check out the nominations for those years. I bet there will be mostly long-forgotten films.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,611 ✭✭✭david75


    _Dara_ wrote: »
    And lastly, the Oscars have always been a byword for mediocrity. Why are people surprised at great films being snubbed? Sometimes great films are nominated, sometimes they win. Sometimes. Usually not though. The Academy generally can’t past earnest, stodgy fare. It was literally ever thus. Pick five years at random since the awards were given out. Check out the nominations for those years. I bet there will be mostly long-forgotten films.


    I can’t remember which films but Shakespeare in love’s best picture win was over a raft of far more deserving films. Certain movie podcasts I listen to are still up in arms about it.
    Wouldn’t call them them byword for mediocrity. I know someone that won an Oscar and it literally changed their entire life and gave them a massively successful career.
    They do matter in public and movie land minds regardless of the academy being middle of the road quite often. Nothing really matters more in that arena.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,971 ✭✭✭_Dara_


    david75 wrote: »
    I can’t remember which films but Shakespeare in love’s best picture win was over a raft of far more deserving films. Certain movie podcasts I listen to are still up in arms about it.
    Wouldn’t call them them byword for mediocrity. I know someone that won an Oscar and it literally changed their entire life and gave them a massively successful career.
    They do matter in public and movie land minds regardless of the academy being middle of the road quite often. Nothing really matters more in that arena.

    I mean that the films picked are rarely the best of the year. Shakespeare In Love being a great example. Forrest fecking Gump beating Pulp Fiction and The Shawshank Redemption (which wouldn’t be for me but is still a classic). Ordinary People beating Raging Bull. The fact that comedies generally aren’t considered worthy (Annie Hall and Dog Day Afternoon being notable exceptions) The Oscars has had this reputation for a long time. I’m sure it IS life-changing for people who win one. It holds a lot of cachet for whatever reason. But that doesn’t change its reputation.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,680 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sad Professor


    6 new rules to prevent repeat of Moonlight/La La Land Oscars envelope gaffe:
    — The addition of a third balloting partner, who will sit with Oscar producers in the show’s control room. Just like the balloting partners stationed on either side of the Dolby Theatre stage, this person will have a complete set of winners’ envelopes and commit the winners to memory. “Think of it as a safety control,” Ryan said.

    — The two partners who worked on last year’s Academy Awards have been replaced, though Ryan confirms that both still work for PwC. The new stage-side partners overseeing the envelopes will include Rick Rosas, who previously worked in that post for 14 years, and colleague Kimberly Bourdon from the company’s Los Angeles office.

    — A new formal procedure is in place for when envelopes are handed over. Both the celebrity presenter and a stage manager will confirm that they’ve been given the correct envelope for the category they are about to present. (Last year’s gaffe occurred when the PwC representative accidentally gave presenters the envelope for best actress rather than best picture.)

    — All three balloting partners will attend show rehearsals and practice what to do if something goes wrong. “Because, as you’re well aware, it took a long time to respond last year when there was a mistake that we made,” Ryan said. “So we’re formally practicing the what-ifs.”

    – The final change is one the academy immediately instituted last year: PwC partners are prohibited from using cellphones or social media during the show.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,480 ✭✭✭MfMan


    _Dara_ wrote: »
    I mean that the films picked are rarely the best of the year. Shakespeare In Love being a great example. Forrest fecking Gump beating Pulp Fiction and The Shawshank Redemption (which wouldn’t be for me but is still a classic). Ordinary People beating Raging Bull. The fact that comedies generally aren’t considered worthy (Annie Hall and Dog Day Afternoon being notable exceptions) The Oscars has had this reputation for a long time. I’m sure it IS life-changing for people who win one. It holds a lot of cachet for whatever reason. But that doesn’t change its reputation.

    Everyone looks at things differently; 'Shakepeare..' wasn't everyone's favourite but I thought it was well done and great fun. For me, 'Saving Private Ryan' was tedious for stretches and begged the question why would anyone go to such trouble to save the awful Matt Damon? The greatest travesty in recent times was surely that twee teeny romance Titanic beating the quite brilliant LA Confidential. Unconscionable.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,061 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    Really is time to end gender awards. When there were two categories for cinematography, set design and costume design (colour and B&W) it made sense as there are distinct technical and artistic differences but acting is acting is acting.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,971 ✭✭✭_Dara_


    MfMan wrote: »
    Everyone looks at things differently; 'Shakepeare..' wasn't everyone's favourite but I thought it was well done and great fun. For me, 'Saving Private Ryan' was tedious for stretches and begged the question why would anyone go to such trouble to save the awful Matt Damon? The greatest travesty in recent times was surely that twee teeny romance Titanic beating the quite brilliant LA Confidential. Unconscionable.

    But, see, somebody else could say “I thought Titanic was well done.”! :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,635 ✭✭✭spacecoyote




  • Administrators, Computer Games Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 32,395 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Mickeroo


    There is no way Get Out should be nominated, it was a total B movie with a silly scifi ending, for me it was good(for a B movie) but not oscar worthy.

    This is the reason I want it to win (though I think it's a smarter film than you're making out). The academy are pretty snobby towards genre movies, would be nice for a horror movie to steal some of the gongs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10 MatthewCurtis


    [font=arial, sans-serif][font=arial, sans-serif]According to rumors, I learned that "Wonder Woman" will not be nominated for an Oscar, it seems the film academy is waiting for trouble from the fans[/font]

    [/font]


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    _Dara_ wrote: »
    I mean that the films picked are rarely the best of the year. Shakespeare In Love being a great example. Forrest fecking Gump beating Pulp Fiction and The Shawshank Redemption (which wouldn’t be for me but is still a classic). Ordinary People beating Raging Bull. The fact that comedies generally aren’t considered worthy (Annie Hall and Dog Day Afternoon being notable exceptions) The Oscars has had this reputation for a long time. I’m sure it IS life-changing for people who win one. It holds a lot of cachet for whatever reason. But that doesn’t change its reputation.

    Forrest Gump is a hilarious film, a brilliant original piece of work. Ordinary people is also a brilliant film for other reasons. Pulp and Shawshank and RB were also exceptional but there is certainly no chasm or lack of quality in the ones that won.

    If you go back to the 60's and 70's you often had 5 incredible films going up against each other, and it comes down to taste, not really lack of quality.
    The only crime I thought in best film was last year, as I had turned off Moonlight after and hour because it was a cliche. Apparently it becomes great after that, but I think given the first hours mediocrity it won for political reasons only.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,514 ✭✭✭valoren


    Really is time to end gender awards. When there were two categories for cinematography, set design and costume design (colour and B&W) it made sense as there are distinct technical and artistic differences but acting is acting is acting.

    Good point. Should be 3 acting awards.

    Lead Actor.
    Supporting Actor.
    Ensemble Cast (where the Casting Director get's the Oscar itself).


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,680 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sad Professor




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,134 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    valoren wrote: »
    Good point. Should be 3 acting awards.

    Lead Actor.
    Supporting Actor.
    Ensemble Cast (where the Casting Director get's the Oscar itself).

    That would cause huge problems.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,461 ✭✭✭✭Zeek12



    If you go back to the 60's and 70's you often had 5 incredible films going up against each other, and it comes down to taste, not really lack of quality.
    The only crime I thought in best film was last year, as I had turned off Moonlight after and hour because it was a cliche. Apparently it becomes great after that, but I think given the first hours mediocrity it won for political reasons only.

    The 70s was a real golden era of American film IMO. But even then there were some questionable Best Picture decisions on Oscar night....
    Rocky beating out Taxi Driver, Network and All the President's Men comes to mind. Rocky is entertaining stuff, but hardly that great....

    Kramer v Kramer chosen ahead of Apocalypse Now and All that Jazz was another odd one.

    To me the Oscars are more about momentum and how well you're liked within the business - rather than a true selection of the best films in a given year


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,971 ✭✭✭_Dara_


    Zeek12 wrote: »
    The 70s was a real golden era of American film IMO. But even then there were some questionable Best Picture decisions on Oscar night....
    Rocky beating out Taxi Driver, Network and All the President's Men comes to mind. Rocky is entertaining stuff, but hardly that great...

    Taxi Driver should win best film every year. Every single goddamn year.

    And you're right. The Oscars has for a long time been about who canvassed the best. The bould Harvey was adept at it apparently.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,638 ✭✭✭✭Arghus


    The Oscars are the culmination of a many months death march. The dizzying, endless, array of other awards whose main purpose seems to be furthering the Oscar campaigns of all involved. If you come out on top after all that you probably do deserve the award - just for sheer effort.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,306 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    Ohmeha wrote: »
    The Florida Project should have got a best picture nomination that's another snub I don't understand when Darkest Hour and Lady Bird are receiving questionable reviews
    I think get out is really overrated tbh and shocked it is in the conversation at all. I would be far more inclined to give a nom to the Florida project (even though I wasn't a huge fan of it but I did admire the cinematography and the acting)
    However Lady bird questionable reviews?!? It has had pretty much universally positive reviews (99% on rotten tomatoes, 94 on metacritic)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,971 ✭✭✭_Dara_


    I think I thought ‘Get Out’ would be really clever based on the rave reviews but it just seemed like a pretty bogstandard horror to me. It truly is a critical darling though.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Zeek12 wrote: »
    The 70s was a real golden era of American film IMO. But even then there were some questionable Best Picture decisions on Oscar night....
    Rocky beating out Taxi Driver, Network and All the President's Men comes to mind. Rocky is entertaining stuff, but hardly that great....

    Kramer v Kramer chosen ahead of Apocalypse Now and All that Jazz was another odd one.

    To me the Oscars are more about momentum and how well you're liked within the business - rather than a true selection of the best films in a given year

    I'd argue that Rocky is a pretty exceptional film at that time. The same thing has been done to death since, but Rocky is the Dirty Harry of Boxing films, and had so many things going for it that have been copied ad nauseam. Its not like Stallone was considered a genius in the industry ever, always thought of as a guy who couldn't act and a meathead. But he managed to come up with a brilliant screenplay, amazing characters. The direction, score, everything about that film was really good - and it was one that can be loved by everyone. I know people (foolish people) who don't like network, or All the presidents men. I can see how Rocky can get the nod with its mass appeal.
    Kramer Vs Kramer, now you definitely have a point with that one. Probably something political with Coppola with the studios having a bunch of issues with him. Or maybe Meryl Streep has secretly been the overlord deity of hollywood forever....


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 7,533 Mod ✭✭✭✭yerwanthere123


    Couple of thoughts..

    The acclaim of Get Out continues to baffle me, and I do believe that it's mostly in response to the American political climate inside the last year. I thought it was very average, but who knows, I may rewatch some time and see what everyone else saw?

    Octavia Spencer getting a nomination is surprising to me too. I mean there was nothing bad about her performance, but I didn't think it was particularly memorable either.

    Sad The Big Sick didn't get the nomination for best picture, even if it never stood a hope of winning anyway. It's one of the best movies I've seen inside the last year or so. Certainly better than fúcking Get Out anyway.

    It's quite impressive how far the Skins alumni have come, Daniel Kaluuya and Dev Patel both now Oscar nominees. Even Jack O' Connell has had a pretty impressive career too.

    Hope Three Billboards wins best picture!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 87,504 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    Casey Affleck has withdrawn from presenting the best actress award


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,306 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    JP Liz V1 wrote: »
    Casey Affleck has withdrawn from presenting the best actress award
    Good...sleazebag!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,323 ✭✭✭p to the e


    gmisk wrote: »
    Good...sleazebag!

    Don't call "JP Liz V1" a sleazebag


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,480 ✭✭✭MfMan


    MfMan wrote: »
    To reiterate, bit disappointed for Jeremy Renner (Wind River), and the film in general. Very skillful. Denzel Washington, who tends to auto-pilot through every movie, seems to be the male Streep.

    The estimable Clarke agrees with me :D

    https://www.irishtimes.com/culture/film/roman-j-israel-esq-colin-farrell-is-fine-the-film-is-a-total-mess-1.3375256


  • Advertisement
Advertisement