Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Dash cam videos thread 3.4 (embedded car dash-cams only)

1424345474871

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    And the same idiot submits the video to a dashcam channel for everyone to see :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,655 ✭✭✭i57dwun4yb1pt8


    the van boat was magical


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 8,061 Mod ✭✭✭✭liamog


    I wonder why the van didn't use the bridge, the way he set's up the phone on the dash makes me think he was doing it to make a cool video as he fords the stream!


  • Posts: 31,118 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    liamog wrote: »
    I wonder why the van didn't use the bridge, the way he set's up the phone on the dash makes me think he was doing it to make a cool video as he fords the stream!
    My thoughts exactly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,499 ✭✭✭cml387


    liamog wrote: »
    I wonder why the van didn't use the bridge, the way he set's up the phone on the dash makes me think he was doing it to make a cool video as he fords the stream!

    I would suspect it's a bridge for walkers only.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,967 ✭✭✭✭Thargor


    McGrath5 wrote: »
    Nothing behind me but they had to make a dart for it...

    Is that in the Glencree area heading back Enniskerry direction from the Sally Gap? Used to love flying it home back to Bray on the bike downhill all the way from the Gap along there but you used to meet some real arseholes there too, theres more people driving on the wrong side of the road there than anywhere else Ive ever seen.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,370 ✭✭✭bladespin


    MasteryDarts Ireland - Master your game!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,883 ✭✭✭chooseusername


    I like where the mobile lane closure truck was positioned


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,729 ✭✭✭✭AndyBoBandy


    I've never seen vans that or any size on a transporter top deck like that!!

    I'm guessing a capsize due to a strong gust!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,370 ✭✭✭bladespin


    I like where the mobile lane closure truck was positioned

    There were incident trucks etc a fair bit back just didn't want a very long vid etc.

    MasteryDarts Ireland - Master your game!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,467 ✭✭✭jimmynokia


    Can you feel for the food delivery lads at all?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,818 ✭✭✭donvito99


    jimmynokia wrote: »
    Can you feel for the food delivery lads at all?

    What's the issue? I see a green light for both, if you want to turn across him expedite the turn.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 8,061 Mod ✭✭✭✭liamog


    I feel for the deliveroo rider, looks like the cam car tried to cut him off in his straight ahead lane.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,818 ✭✭✭donvito99


    I think they're on strike tomorrow so he'll have to find another excuse for slowing thru traffic on the quays.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,467 ✭✭✭jimmynokia


    donvito99 wrote: »
    What's the issue? I see a green light for both, if you want to turn across him expedite the turn.

    SEE NOTE 11

    http://www.cyclingireland.ie/downloads/ci%20ride%20leader%20-%20guide%20to%20cycling%20on%20the%20road.pdf


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,685 ✭✭✭✭wonski


    No idea what's wrong there...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,374 ✭✭✭iwillhtfu


    jimmynokia wrote: »

    What's your point as it has zero bearing on that clip.

    The clip is a non issue created by someone that thought they caught a deliveroo driver doing something terrible :eek:. I'm also well aware that some deliveroo drivers are an absolute disaster with zero fecks given, same could be said for those bicycle tuck tuck drivers and god forbid some motorists.

    Had a pedestrian walked out there you can be sure that clip wouldn't have gotten any air time. :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,818 ✭✭✭donvito99


    jimmynokia wrote: »

    Note 11?
    11.Cyclists should always apply a “leave no trace” ethos when
    cycling and should keep any food wrappers, gel packaging or
    empty bottles etc. until they can be disposed of.

    If he's abeam your car he has the right of way. Accelerate and make the turn otherwise.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,292 ✭✭✭DaveyDave


    wonski wrote: »
    No idea what's wrong there...

    He wanted to cut off another vehicle and cross an active lane of traffic to make a turn?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,685 ✭✭✭✭wonski


    DaveyDave wrote: »
    He wanted to cut off another vehicle and cross an active lane of traffic to make a turn?

    Well he didn't.

    I meant I have no idea what's wrong with cyclist there ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,374 ✭✭✭iwillhtfu


    DaveyDave wrote: »
    He wanted to cut off another vehicle and cross an active lane of traffic to make a turn?

    but but but he's entitled to I mean road tax yada yada yada

    I'd say someone got a new dash cam to play with.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,292 ✭✭✭DaveyDave


    Even if the cyclist was wrong, you can see him up ahead, best just let him pass and make the turn safely.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 8,061 Mod ✭✭✭✭liamog


    DaveyDave wrote: »
    Even if the cyclist was wrong, you can see him up ahead, best just let him pass and make the turn safely.

    Cyclist isn't in the wrong though, he's proceeding straight across a junction in his lane on a green light, this is no different than a driver passing a slower driver on the left and then trying to turn across them at the junction.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 38 Haraldkare


    jimmynokia wrote: »

    11 A cyclist should NEVER go up the path side of a large
    vehicle (bus or lorry) even if there is a bike lane there – wait
    until it turns or drives away.


    I find it funny that you apply this advice to the scenario shown.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,292 ✭✭✭DaveyDave


    liamog wrote: »
    Cyclist isn't in the wrong though, he's proceeding straight across a junction in his lane on a green light, this is no different than a driver passing a slower driver on the left and then trying to turn across them at the junction.

    Oh I know, the cyclist is in an active lane. It's a bit like going from the middle lane to exit a motorway across someone. I was just saying *if* they were wrong, even if the driver was in the right, it's not smart to try cut across them. When you're arriving at the junction at the same time it's a fairly predictable situation and easily avoided.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 8,061 Mod ✭✭✭✭liamog


    DaveyDave wrote: »
    Oh I know, the cyclist is in an active lane. It's a bit like going from the middle lane to exit a motorway across someone. I was just saying *if* they were wrong, even if the driver was in the right, it's not smart to try cut across them. When you're arriving at the junction at the same time it's a fairly predictable situation and easily avoided.

    Ahh I get you, I was thinking the best analogy for people who don't see the issues is turning long left over a bus lane.

    If you had to make the left turn and there was a bus coming up your inside then you'd hold off to allow the bus to proceed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,644 ✭✭✭✭punisher5112


    Wtf is going on...

    Absolutely nothing to see in that clip


  • Posts: 7,712 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    DaveyDave wrote: »
    Even if the cyclist was wrong, you can see him up ahead, best just let him pass and make the turn safely.

    Yep this. Going by the footage he was easily seen and not signalling right, so best for everyone to just keep an eye out and let him go on before turning.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,070 ✭✭✭✭Seve OB


    Jimmy Nokia feeling the unlove and realised he was barking up the wrong tree so now gone underground


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,644 ✭✭✭✭punisher5112


    4 people liked the video on YouTube!!!

    What the actual fluck......


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,467 ✭✭✭jimmynokia


    Seve OB wrote: »
    Jimmy Nokia feeling the unlove and realised he was barking up the wrong tree so now gone underground

    Sadly not. Point here is because of a stupid design and in darker hours it's dangerous so if an accident did occur who's at fault


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,818 ✭✭✭donvito99


    jimmynokia wrote: »
    Sadly not. Point here is because of a stupid design and in darker hours it's dangerous so if an accident did occur who's at fault

    It's actually a surprisingly good design IMO. The problem is you my friend.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,467 ✭✭✭jimmynokia


    donvito99 wrote: »
    It's actually a surprisingly good design IMO. The problem is you my friend.

    Don't think so. Let's see how long before something happens and the outcome. Judging by the cycle brigade here they've the right just to carry on. The speed some of them cycle and on dark nights this will be a problem that's all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,644 ✭✭✭✭punisher5112


    jimmynokia wrote: »
    Sadly not. Point here is because of a stupid design and in darker hours it's dangerous so if an accident did occur who's at fault

    Either way car insurance pays as cyclists haven't any unless personal insurance taken out.

    The deliveroo gear reflects at night, street lights a plenty in the city and use mirror....

    If you are ahead and indicated to turn them no cyclists should pass unless you don't have a turn arrow or full green(circle)
    The onus is on the driver to check it's safe.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,795 ✭✭✭Isambard


    jimmynokia wrote: »
    Don't think so. Let's see how long before something happens and the outcome. Judging by the cycle brigade here they've the right just to carry on. The speed some of them cycle and on dark nights this will be a problem that's all.

    speeding cyclists? i doubt they exceed the limit too often.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,903 ✭✭✭micar


    I take it Jimmy that's you driving.

    Another motorist who lacks any forward thinking.

    Where did you think cyclist was going to go?

    Why do you think it's acceptable to start turning right across into the cycle lane knowing there was a cyclist coming on your right.

    Perhaps you did it deliberately thinking you do have right of way (Which you don't) to see what the cyclist would do. If that's the case shame on you for risking a potential serious injury on the cyclist.

    It's motorists like you who need to be given a bike told to cycle around the city. You will experience crap driving like that. May be due to that experience, you're driving might improve.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,467 ✭✭✭jimmynokia


    micar wrote: »
    I take it Jimmy that's you driving.

    Another motorist who lacks any forward thinking.

    Where did you think cyclist was going to go?

    Why do you think it's acceptable to start turning right across into the cycle lane knowing there was a cyclist coming on your right.

    Perhaps you did it deliberately thinking you do have right of way (Which you don't) to see what the cyclist would do. If that's the case shame on you for risking a potential serious injury on the cyclist.

    It's motorists like you who need to be given a bike told to cycle around the city. You will experience crap driving like that. May be due to that experience, you're driving might improve.

    If you look once more driver stopped second how did anyone know where he was going. And lastly I do cycle in fact.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,903 ✭✭✭micar


    jimmynokia wrote: »
    If you look once more driver stopped second how did anyone know where he was going. And lastly I do cycle in fact.

    The driver began to turn right before the cyclist passed.

    The cyclist is in the left hand cycle lane which has an arrow pointing straight.....there's your clue.

    The effect of the driver starting to turn right meant the cyclist cyclist ended up having the move to the right as their safe space was removed.

    Were you the driver?

    If you are the driver and also a cyclist then you are an absolute disgrace.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,059 ✭✭✭kirving


    micar wrote: »
    It's motorists like you who need to be given a bike told to cycle around the city. You will experience crap driving like that. May be due to that experience, you're driving might improve.

    100% should be on the driving test.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,644 ✭✭✭✭punisher5112


    Right I'll say it... If this clip is as it is and the driver came up and passed the cyclist then car driver definitely needs Togo get some lessons.


    I actually can't believe this is getting such a discussion....


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,903 ✭✭✭micar


    Right I'll say it... If this clip is as it is and the driver came up and passed the cyclist then car driver definitely needs Togo get some lessons.


    I actually can't believe this is getting such a discussion....

    Cos it's a fine example of a motorist who believes he/she did nothing wrong and if an accident did occur it would be the cyclists fault.

    There will be others who see this and think the same thing


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,100 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    jimmynokia wrote: »
    Sadly not. Point here is because of a stupid design and in darker hours it's dangerous so if an accident did occur who's at fault

    Very good design. If that is dangerous then so is every 2 lane one way road in the country


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,232 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    jimmynokia wrote: »
    Sadly not. Point here is because of a stupid design and in darker hours it's dangerous so if an accident did occur who's at fault
    no, the point you explicitly made was that you don't feel sorry for food delivery cyclists - you were blaming him, not the road design. put down the goalposts. *and* stop digging, doing both must be tiring.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,795 ✭✭✭Isambard


    and the video has gone....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,903 ✭✭✭micar


    Isambard wrote: »
    and the video has gone....

    Jimmy didnt get the support he thought he'd get.

    To be fair, motorits should see clips like that. They might actually learn something.


  • Posts: 7,712 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    micar wrote: »
    Jimmy didnt get the support he thought he'd get.

    To be fair, motorits should see clips like that. They might actually learn something.

    I don’t think most people who replied need to learn anything. The cyclist brigade wading in tarring everyone with the same brush probably doesn’t really help, especially when most would agree with you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,903 ✭✭✭micar


    The cyclist brigade wading in tarring everyone with the same brush probably doesn’t really help

    Those same cyclists like me are also drivers.

    "Tarring everyone with the same brush" is exactly what motorists do against cyclists all the time.

    You'd be surprised how many motorists who feel it's ok to go past a cyclist to take an immediate left turn.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,795 ✭✭✭Isambard


    micar wrote: »
    Those same cyclists like me are also drivers.

    "Tarring everyone with the same brush" is exactly what motorists do against cyclists all the time.

    You'd be surprised how many motorists who feel it's ok to go past a cyclist to take an immediate left turn.

    yes but the point being made is that you can't tar all cyclists with the same brush and yet you seem to be tarring all motorists.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,903 ✭✭✭micar


    Isambard wrote: »
    yes but the point being made is that you can't tar all cyclists with the same brush and yet you seem to be tarring all motorists.

    And I'm sure that really pisses you off.

    Don't worry the converse also applies.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 7,712 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You don’t make it easy.


Advertisement