Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Social contradiction on how we treat animals

1356789

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,996 ✭✭✭✭gozunda


    Tilikum17 wrote: »
    Edinburgh

    Scribbles on a wall are an argument for ?

    I think you will find that hospitals admit all types of people - including vegans suffering from cancer, diabetes (type 1 & 2), heart disease etc etc

    As for Kwashiorkor (protein deficiency) it's not really a condition for joking around or for the purpose of agenda pushing is it?

    See: https://www.healthline.com/health/kwashiorkor


  • Registered Users Posts: 755 ✭✭✭davidjtaylor


    What exactly have these to do with the thread title?

    It's another failure of logic, perhaps, another contradiction of logic.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,996 ✭✭✭✭gozunda


    It's another failure of logic, perhaps, another contradiction of logic.

    Whose 'failure / contradiction of logic?

    One is a bizarre reference to illness & hospital and the other is a rather bizarre graph showing a foodstuff (bacon) compared with a diet / lifestyle (vegan)

    From the thread title - I think we are discussing whether there are any 'social contradictions' how people treat animals' and whether or not - some graph shows something or other in terms of search results is neither here nor there

    So nope don't see any relevance there tbh...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,748 ✭✭✭ganmo


    It's another failure of logic, perhaps, another contradiction of logic.

    right lets go through the claim and how they relate to society's treatment of animals

    Heart disease - Age, Sex Genetics, Smoking
    Diabetes - Type 1 purely genetic, type 2 sugar intake
    Obesity - calorie intake vs exercise
    Cancer - genetics, sun exposure, smoking, radiation, viruses, bacteria, alcohol

    where diet does come into the listed diseases(except diabetes) its excessive intake of everything.

    now tell me again how that post relates to the thread?


  • Registered Users Posts: 755 ✭✭✭davidjtaylor


    ganmo wrote: »
    right lets go through the claim and how they relate to society's treatment of animals

    Heart disease - Age, Sex Genetics, Smoking
    Diabetes - Type 1 purely genetic, type 2 sugar intake
    Obesity - calorie intake vs exercise
    Cancer - genetics, sun exposure, smoking, radiation, viruses, bacteria, alcohol

    where diet does come into the listed diseases(except diabetes) its excessive intake of everything.

    now tell me again how that post relates to the thread?

    Hang on, you seem to be saying that meat and dairy consumption have nothing to do with hospitals filled with people with the above ailments.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,203 ✭✭✭emaherx


    Tilikum17 wrote: »
    Google trends

    Most people who eat bacon don't Google it

    https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?geo=US&q=McDonalds,Vegan


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,748 ✭✭✭ganmo


    Hang on, you seem to be saying that meat and dairy consumption have nothing to do with hospitals filled with people with the above ailments.

    compared to other risk factors yes

    take diabetes for example. an addition 150 calories from all sources rose the risk 0.1% where the 150 came from sugar it rose the risk 1%

    I've actually never heard of meat being a factor in diabetes


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,996 ✭✭✭✭gozunda


    Hang on, you seem to be saying that meat and dairy consumption have nothing to do with hospitals filled with people with the above ailments.

    I think you are going waaaay of topic there....

    Are you saying that the small percentage of vegans that exist don't get cancer, diabetes, heart disease etc or or that those that do - arn't being treated in hospital??

    Vegans can have unhealthy diets - A junkfood diet of doughnuts and coke etc could be vegan but wouldn't be good for you either ..


  • Registered Users Posts: 755 ✭✭✭davidjtaylor


    ganmo wrote: »
    compared to other risk factors yes

    take diabetes for example. an addition 150 calories from all sources rose the risk 0.1% where the 150 came from sugar it rose the risk 1%

    I've actually never heard of meat being a factor in diabetes

    Yes, diabetes is primarily associated with excessive glucose consumption. But you seem to be saying that meat and dairy has nothing to do with all the other leading causes of death. Apologies if I've misunderstood you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,996 ✭✭✭✭gozunda


    Yes, diabetes is primarily associated with excessive glucose consumption. But you seem to be saying that meat and dairy has nothing to do with all the other leading causes of death. Apologies if I've misunderstood you.

    Wrong. type 1 and type 2 diabetes are not the same condition and are not linked by 'excessive glucose consumption' (sic)

    Just because a person goes to hospital does not mean they at deaths door either ... I think you are
    conflabulating your opinions on things being bad, treatment in hospital and dying.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,203 ✭✭✭emaherx


    Hang on, you seem to be saying that meat and dairy consumption have nothing to do with hospitals filled with people with the above ailments.

    Hmm hospitals full of sick people who eat meat, because most people eat meat?

    An unhealthy Vegan Diet can also lead to heart disease just like an unhealthy diet which has meat/dairy.

    https://www.nhs.uk/news/food-and-diet/some-types-of-vegetarian-diet-can-raise-heart-disease-risk/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,748 ✭✭✭ganmo


    Yes, diabetes is primarily associated with excessive glucose consumption. But you seem to be saying that meat and dairy has nothing to do with all the other leading causes of death. Apologies if I've misunderstood you.
    ganmo wrote: »
    compared to other risk factors yes

    take diabetes for example. an addition 150 calories from all sources rose the risk 0.1% where the 150 came from sugar it rose the risk 1%

    I've actually never heard of meat being a factor in diabetes

    how much of an impact do you say meat has on diabetes ?

    Google "risk factors" and any of the diseases come back when you found a ranked list that says meat on it


  • Registered Users Posts: 755 ✭✭✭davidjtaylor


    ganmo wrote: »
    how much of an impact do you say meat has on diabetes ?

    I'm not a statistician or medical researcher, so I can't say. Why do you ask?


  • Registered Users Posts: 755 ✭✭✭davidjtaylor


    emaherx wrote: »
    An unhealthy Vegan Diet can also lead to heart disease just like an unhealthy diet which has meat/dairy.

    I agree entirely.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,748 ✭✭✭ganmo


    I'm not a statistician or medical researcher, so I can't say. Why do you ask?

    because you seem to think there is a link and I say there isn't

    btw I'm not a medical researcher either but i know how to use google scholar


  • Registered Users Posts: 755 ✭✭✭davidjtaylor


    ganmo wrote: »
    because you seem to think there is a link and I say there isn't

    I've never stated there is a link between meat and diabetes, though I'd have an open mind about it. Where did I say it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,996 ✭✭✭✭gozunda


    I agree entirely.

    So you agree that vegans can and do end up in hospitals for treatment of various conditions- lifestyle and otherwise?

    This makes for an interesting read ...

    https://www.nutritionadvance.com/vegan-propaganda-and-meat/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,748 ✭✭✭ganmo


    I've never stated there is a link between meat and diabetes, though I'd have an open mind about it. Where did I say it?

    I didn't say you said it, i said you seem to think...

    why I think this? you thanked post #97
    and
    Yes, diabetes is primarily associated with excessive glucose consumption. But you seem to be saying that meat and dairy has nothing to do with all the other leading causes of death. Apologies if I've misunderstood you.


  • Registered Users Posts: 755 ✭✭✭davidjtaylor


    I've never stated there is a link between meat and diabetes, though I'd have an open mind about it. Where did I say it?
    ganmo wrote: »
    I didn't say you said it, i said you seem to think...

    why I think this? you thanked post #97

    Gosh, you're reading a hell of a lot in a simple thanked post.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 755 ✭✭✭davidjtaylor


    Yes, diabetes is primarily associated with excessive glucose consumption.

    Just my usual cautious self.
    But you seem to be saying that meat and dairy has nothing to do with all the other leading causes of death.

    I might be reading too much in your posts but you never answered that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,748 ✭✭✭ganmo


    Gosh, you're reading a hell of a lot in a simple thanked post.

    it wasn't too long ago a mod on this forum warned against thanking posts, might even be on this thread


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,748 ✭✭✭ganmo


    Just my usual cautious self.



    I might be reading too much in your posts but you never answered that.

    for the third time
    ganmo wrote: »
    compared to other risk factors yes

    take diabetes for example. an addition 150 calories from all sources rose the risk 0.1% where the 150 came from sugar it rose the risk 1%

    I've actually never heard of meat being a factor in diabetes


  • Registered Users Posts: 755 ✭✭✭davidjtaylor


    ganmo wrote: »
    it wasn't too long ago a mod on this forum warned against thanking posts, might even be on this thread

    I didn't see that, sorry. I was just thanking a poster for linking to an image relevant to veganism.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,219 ✭✭✭✭Nekarsulm


    I didn't see that, sorry. I was just thanking a poster for linking to an image relevant to veganism.

    I fail to see what grafitti on a Scottish wall has to do with keeping a pet, versus rausing an animal for food.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,219 ✭✭✭✭Nekarsulm


    I didn't see that, sorry. I was just thanking a poster for linking to an image relevant to veganism.

    I fail to see what a photo of grafitti on a Scottish wall has to do with keeping a pet, versus rausing an animal for food.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I suppose this is the kind of contradiction that we see many examples of yearly -

    Dog rescued after plunging 80ft down mineshaft in Ceredigion http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-45402874


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,996 ✭✭✭✭gozunda


    I suppose this is the kind of contradiction that we see many examples of yearly -

    Dog rescued after plunging 80ft down mineshaft in Ceredigion http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-45402874

    What would you like - for the animal to be left there? Really? Even livestock are rescued from such situations.

    https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/cows-plunge-30ft-down-mine-8464182

    No contradiction except that which is in your mind imo.

    Tbh it's an old hoary chestnut and a failed argument at this stage ...


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I didn't see that, sorry. I was just thanking a poster for linking to an image relevant to veganism.

    No need to apologise.

    I think I remember it was about people thanking posts that were recipes containing meat or something similar as an ingredient.

    So I think it was about thanking posts that were obviously trolling.

    It was along those lines anyway iirc.


  • Registered Users Posts: 755 ✭✭✭davidjtaylor


    No need to apologise.

    I think I remember it was about people thanking posts that were recipes containing meat or something similar as an ingredient.

    So I think it was about thanking posts that were obviously trolling.

    It was along those lines anyway iirc.

    Right. I suppose even trolls like a bit of backscratching!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,498 ✭✭✭BrokenArrows


    From the social aspect of what we kill for food compared to keep for a pet its all down to what we consider to be beautiful.

    Dog, Cat, Horse etc = Cute or Beautiful = Pet
    Pig, Cow, Fish etc = Animal/unattractive = Food.
    Rats, Mice etc = Dirty, ugly = kill it for no particular purpose.

    The majority of Vegetarians are happy to eat Fish because they see them as ugly, not cute, stupid and strangely they are killed in the worst most inhumane way possible, by slow suffocation by the millions.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    From the social aspect of what we kill for food compared to keep for a pet its all down to what we consider to be beautiful.

    Dog, Cat, Horse etc = Cute or Beautiful = Pet
    Pig, Cow, Fish etc = Animal/unattractive = Food.
    Rats, Mice etc = Dirty, ugly = kill it for no particular purpose.

    The majority of Vegetarians are happy to eat Fish because they see them as ugly, not cute, stupid and strangely they are killed in the worst most inhumane way possible, by slow suffocation by the millions.

    Horse is eaten without a second thought in plenty of countries - Poland, Belgium, Germany, Switzerland, Japan, Indonesia and China to name a few.

    Cow is not eaten by Hindus so large parts of India don’t consume cow.

    Pork is prohibited by Islamic law so that’s a lot in the Middle East that don’t consume pig.

    Jews don’t eat pig either so that’s quite a few people too.

    Cats and dogs are seen as food in China, South Korea, Vietnam, Laos and a few other countries I can’t remember.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,203 ✭✭✭emaherx


    From the social aspect of what we kill for food compared to keep for a pet its all down to what we consider to be beautiful.

    Dog, Cat, Horse etc = Cute or Beautiful = Pet
    Pig, Cow, Fish etc = Animal/unattractive = Food.
    Rats, Mice etc = Dirty, ugly = kill it for no particular purpose.

    The majority of Vegetarians are happy to eat Fish because they see them as ugly, not cute, stupid and strangely they are killed in the worst most inhumane way possible, by slow suffocation by the millions.

    Horse is often eaten. Quite widely worldwide, only reason most don't make it to food chain after there life in recreational use is the use of bute. Only reason there was a horse meat scandal was untraceablity of source and blatent false advertisement.

    Rats/mice spread disease by peeing on your food, maybe you would like a world where they are not controlled?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,618 ✭✭✭✭_Brian


    From the social aspect of what we kill for food compared to keep for a pet its all down to what we consider to be beautiful.

    Dog, Cat, Horse etc = Cute or Beautiful = Pet
    Pig, Cow, Fish etc = Animal/unattractive = Food.
    Rats, Mice etc = Dirty, ugly = kill it for no particular purpose.

    The majority of Vegetarians are happy to eat Fish because they see them as ugly, not cute, stupid and strangely they are killed in the worst most inhumane way possible, by slow suffocation by the millions.


    I'd have to disagree with much of that..
    We keep cattle and farmers can really appreciate the proper breeding in an animal, its conformation and stature, but still consider it both a good specimen of an animal and food.. Farmers like their animals, some still name them, but keep the objective view of their eventual purpose.


    Our pigs which we keep for the table are cute as hell when they arrive 10-12 weeks old, less cute now that they are 50kg but good fun to be around and each has its own charactor, but there's no doubt even with our kids that they are destined for the table..


    My youngest daughter spends plenty of time with her chickens, naming them and knows each from the other, what age they are etc, but the are accepted as both pet and food source..


    Take dogs, some are horrid looking some are nice, the only reason I don't consider them food is after eating it I'd consider it low grade meat and no way satisfactory feeding..


    I love the look of a nice white piece fo fish, battered and golden on the outside, but I hate the taste and so don't ever eat it..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,996 ✭✭✭✭gozunda


    From the social aspect of what we kill for food compared to keep for a pet its all down to what we consider to be beautiful.

    Dog, Cat, Horse etc = Cute or Beautiful = Pet
    Pig, Cow, Fish etc = Animal/unattractive = Food.
    Rats, Mice etc = Dirty, ugly = kill it for no particular purpose.

    The majority of Vegetarians are happy to eat Fish because they see them as ugly, not cute, stupid and strangely they are killed in the worst most inhumane way possible, by slow suffocation by the millions.

    I would disagree with that summary

    Dog, Cat, Horse etc = animals which have unique qualities and abilities which historically have made valuable contribributions to human society. e.g. dogs for hunting. Cats for vermin control horses for transport. Also companion animals such as dogs and cats easily house trained etc

    Pig, Cow, Fish etc - traditional hunted species which formed part of human diet going back two million years long before agriculture ..

    Rats, Mice etc = animals which cause significant danger to human based foodstuffs and are known vectors of communicable diseases.

    Tbh there a lots of "pretty' cows, pigs and and even even rats which could be called cute. So the level of attractiveness has very little to do with what humans eat or dont eat.

    Making sweeping statements that vegetarians eat something such as fish because they not 'cute' is farcical.

    Vegetarians dont eat fish - pescatarians do!

    Edit: _Brian you bet me to it ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,618 ✭✭✭✭_Brian


    gozunda wrote: »
    pescatarians


    i had to google that :o


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,498 ✭✭✭BrokenArrows


    Horse is eaten without a second thought in plenty of countries - Poland, Belgium, Germany, Switzerland, Japan, Indonesia and China to name a few.

    Cow is not eaten by Hindus so large parts of India don’t consume cow.

    Pork is prohibited by Islamic law so that’s a lot in the Middle East that don’t consume pig.

    Jews don’t eat pig either so that’s quite a few people too.

    Cats and dogs are seen as food in China, South Korea, Vietnam, Laos and a few other countries I can’t remember.

    Yes of course there are diet variations around the world, in Asia insects can be eaten without a second thought.

    Im talking about it from an Irish perspective.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,618 ✭✭✭✭_Brian


    Yes of course there are diet variations around the world, in Asia insects can be eaten without a second thought.

    Im talking about it from an Irish perspective.

    Can’t accept that cows = ugly = this justifies eating them.

    Here’s an Irish Moiled heifer, nothing short of a stunning looking animal, these spectacular animals produce marvellous beef.

    http://blog.agriimages.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/cv14mol-3142.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,498 ✭✭✭BrokenArrows


    _Brian wrote: »
    Can’t accept that cows = ugly = this justifies eating them.

    Here’s an Irish Moiled heifer, nothing short of a stunning looking animal, these spectacular animals produce marvellous beef.

    http://blog.agriimages.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/cv14mol-3142.jpg

    Agree to disagree on that one.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,748 ✭✭✭ganmo


    Agree to disagree on that one.

    beauty is in the eye of the beholder


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    More pretend outrage from the public -

    Australia emu video investigated for 'horrific cruelty' http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-australia-45596870


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,996 ✭✭✭✭gozunda


    More pretend outrage from the public -

    Australia emu video investigated for 'horrific cruelty' http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-australia-45596870

    Don't see what's 'pretend' about tbh.

    The police and the RSPCA dont make it 'public' btw. And if by 'pretend outrage - do you mean are in agreement / following the law? Yes they are - but then that's not pretend outrage either ...

    You can't legislate for some crazy. Australians.

    Seriously I hope the guy is dealt with properly ...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,996 ✭✭✭✭gozunda


    Came across these two lovely news stories of a cow and a dog being rescued in seperate incidents after falling from cliffs in Devon and Cornwall. Just more examples of parity of rescue efforts for both farm and domestic pets ...

    https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-devon-45357436

    https://www.piratefm.co.uk/news/latest-news/2676829/dog-survives-fall-from-highest-cliffs-in-cornwall/

    :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,573 ✭✭✭JeffKenna



    Do the people who get enraged by a woman throwing a cat into a bin - https://www.google.com.au/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/world/2010/oct/19/cat-bin-woman-mary-bale - not understand what happens to animals for the provision of their meat and dairy ?

    I think its you that doesn't understand what happens to animals for the provision of meat and dairy.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    JeffKenna wrote: »
    I think its you that doesn't understand what happens to animals for the provision of meat and dairy.

    I understand it perfectly well and that’s why I advocate cruelty free food.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,305 ✭✭✭✭the_syco


    Yes of course there are diet variations around the world, in Asia insects can be eaten without a second thought.

    Im talking about it from an Irish perspective.
    I'm noticing a few places are bringing in eating insects as a healthier option.


  • Registered Users Posts: 755 ✭✭✭davidjtaylor


    JeffKenna wrote: »
    I think its you that doesn't understand what happens to animals for the provision of meat and dairy.
    I understand it perfectly well and that’s why I advocate cruelty free food.

    JeffKenna's post comes across as a bit strange for one posted on an veg*n forum. :D:D


  • Registered Users Posts: 755 ✭✭✭davidjtaylor


    the_syco wrote: »
    I'm noticing a few places are bringing in eating insects as a healthier option.

    In Ireland?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,996 ✭✭✭✭gozunda


    JeffKenna's post comes across as a bit strange for one posted on an veg*n forum.

    I don't think that's correct - strangely there's probably more threads with comments here about meat, dairy and animal farming than most other forums.

    Plus 'cruelty free food' is an oxymoron - where 'cruelty' defined by some includes the death of animals and organisms. It remains all food producion involves the death of other organisms and animals. A lot of it is deliberate as well such as the spraying of pesticides. It matters little to the dead bunny or whatever which is killed during cultivation that its death might or might not have been 'unintentional'. All that needs to be recognised tbh.

    If anything that's the single biggest glaring contradiction - whether anyone acknowledges it or otherwise imo.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,996 ✭✭✭✭gozunda


    In Ireland?

    Two that I've came across are popup restaurant and a company set up in the last couple of years

    http://www.thejournal.ie/hexafly-alvan-hunt-2-3726027-Nov2017/

    https://www.rentokil.ie/pestaurant/.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,573 ✭✭✭JeffKenna


    I understand it perfectly well and that’s why I advocate cruelty free food.

    Do you also feel as strongly about cruelty free clothing? I presume you don't purchase anything from primark, Nike etc considering the quality of life of animals in Ireland is far superior to that of the 6 year old child making those clothes.


Advertisement