Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Fake watch busters

18911131435

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 651 ✭✭✭2shea




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 832 ✭✭✭funkyouup


    Check out his feedback, It all looks to be feedback from sellers rather than buyers. I wouldnt buy form him based on that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,357 ✭✭✭✭Birneybau


    That bracelet looks like the one I got with my €60 amphibia. Right arm hair puller. And left arm hair before some clever git makes the obvious joke! :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 32 Mike.GTI


    Can anyone verify this one for me please?

    Omega De ville

    Thanks


    https://photos.app.goo.gl/zeiB9yahEzdKF4Bc8


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 738 ✭✭✭AndyP


    Mike.GTI wrote: »
    Can anyone verify this one for me please?

    Omega De ville

    Thanks


    https://photos.app.goo.gl/zeiB9yahEzdKF4Bc8

    Look at the capital S in Seamaster, looks totally wrong (aswell as the rest of the fonts).


  • Registered Users Posts: 32 Mike.GTI


    Yes the S looked odd as did the omega emblem. Seller has a long history of watch sales though and 100% feedback.

    Serial number indicates a 1966 model.


  • Registered Users Posts: 651 ✭✭✭2shea


    Mike.GTI wrote: »
    Can anyone verify this one for me please?

    Omega De ville

    Thanks


    https://photos.app.goo.gl/zeiB9yahEzdKF4Bc8

    No that looks off.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,932 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    The quality of some of the fakes out there at the moment, down to even case depth and weights is actually frightening!
    I'd hate to be spending money on a watch these days without a check in an AD or trusted watch smiths 1st.


  • Registered Users Posts: 651 ✭✭✭2shea


    banie01 wrote: »
    The quality of some of the fakes out there at the moment, down to even case depth and weights is actually frightening!
    I'd hate to be spending money on a watch these days without a check in an AD or trusted watch smiths 1st.

    What's the story with that. Will an AD actually check for you and if so who does it and do they charge? Iv been to a few ADs for Rolex and Tudor and the sales person hadn't a clue.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 105 ✭✭theheavyhitter


    2shea wrote: »
    What's the story with that. Will an AD actually check for you and if so who does it and do they charge? Iv been to a few ADs for Rolex and Tudor and the sales person hadn't a clue.

    Agreed, they sometimes get it wrong too. Declaring a correct piece as incorrect, when the reality is they just don't know. Personally I would never buy a used piece without seeing it with the caseback off. If a seller is willing to advertise with pictures of the caseback off showing its markings, and the movement; then generally speaking, they; and the piece are genuine. Its something fake sellers will never do, remove the caseback for a prospective buyer. I always think its a good test, if they are confident in removing the caseback to prove a pieces provenance.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,149 ✭✭✭893bet


    Agreed, they sometimes get it wrong too. Declaring a correct piece as incorrect, when the reality is they just don't know. Personally I would never buy a used piece without seeing it with the caseback off. If a seller is willing to advertise with pictures of the caseback off showing its markings, and the movement; then generally speaking, they; and the piece are genuine. Its something fake sellers will never do, remove the caseback for a prospective buyer. I always think its a good test, if they are confident in removing the caseback to prove a pieces provenance.

    Agreed. Things are not always as they seem. Lots of untrustworthy sorts about.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,932 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    Agreed, they sometimes get it wrong too. Declaring a correct piece as incorrect, when the reality is they just don't know. Personally I would never buy a used piece without seeing it with the caseback off. If a seller is willing to advertise with pictures of the caseback off showing its markings, and the movement; then generally speaking, they; and the piece are genuine. Its something fake sellers will never do, remove the caseback for a prospective buyer. I always think its a good test, if they are confident in removing the caseback to prove a pieces provenance.

    Even case back off in some cases isn't a great help unless the buyer is hugely experienced.
    Some pieces are available with fully cloned movements.
    Others have a decorated rotor and enough "dressing up" to pass even that cursory test if not very experienced.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 105 ✭✭theheavyhitter


    893bet wrote: »
    Agreed. Things are not always as they seem. Lots of untrustworthy sorts about.

    A big problem with vintage is Frankenwatches. I have seen some really convincing ones that are a mixture of genuine old parts, and made to look old dials and hands. The markings, movements, engravings, etc were all correct.
    But the dial and hands weren't original, the lume was stained to patina it, and dial oven baked most probably to give it the right vintage look.
    Archie did a good video on a Redline Submariner he was brokering, and found out it had the wrong (genuine Rolex) caseback from a 5513.
    This is why I avoid vintage as its a minefield, unless one takes the piece to a watchmaker who really knows what he is looking at.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,310 ✭✭✭✭Cienciano


    OmegaGene wrote: »
    Luckily the community in Ireland is small enough to eliminate the untrustworthy characters

    Maybe not eliminate, but they're certainly obvious when they show up.

    With regards to watches, it's easy enough to google a good quality photo of a watch with the back off to compare with a fake.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,357 ✭✭✭✭Birneybau




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,157 ✭✭✭✭Alanstrainor


    Birneybau wrote: »
    Quartz watch, states automatic on the caseback

    And 300Meters water resistant on the front, whereas it's 200M on the back. But all the detail aside, it looks horrendous...


  • Registered Users Posts: 211 ✭✭Graham1978


    Speaking of Fake watches, has anyone seen intime04 website ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 832 ✭✭✭funkyouup


    Jaysus, they actually sell Rolex papers to go along with the watches.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,310 ✭✭✭✭Cienciano


    Graham1978 wrote: »
    Speaking of Fake watches, has anyone seen ****website ?

    Rep watch websites is against the charter.

    But some sites sell lots of fake designer gear and even give fake receipts from shops! :eek:
    Fake rolex box, rolex bag and papers can be had for €25. The top quality watches could fool someone, but the box and papers aren't as good quality imho.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,149 ✭✭✭893bet




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,775 ✭✭✭Lorddrakul


    893bet wrote: »

    Dodgy with a capital DODGE!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,357 ✭✭✭✭Birneybau


    893bet wrote: »

    The seller seems a bit off


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,149 ✭✭✭893bet


    https://www.adverts.ie/17662872

    Date window looks dodge. 5 very far left


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 832 ✭✭✭funkyouup


    Purchased from Trotters in Bethnal Green lol

    edit - place actually exists


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,149 ✭✭✭893bet


    OmegaGene wrote: »
    It’s a customised pvd thing with third party bits and pieces and the blue date wheel is one of them which is not aligned for the watch
    Horrid looking thing imo

    Didn’t realise they had replaced the date wheel. Total franken aside from the pvd.

    Agree it looks a total mess.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,357 ✭✭✭✭Birneybau


    OmegaGene wrote: »
    It’s a customised pvd thing with third party bits and pieces and the blue date wheel is one of them which is not aligned for the watch
    Horrid looking thing imo

    Why on Earth would you mod a Rolex?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,257 ✭✭✭✭Eoin




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 832 ✭✭✭funkyouup


    Eoin wrote: »

    i wonder does Juan pablo know he is collaborating with that site:pac:


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 262 ✭✭TomasMacR


    stumbled across this thread, has me wondering now...bought a watch for my old man off Chrono24. Omega, paid a good bit for it. Anyone care to take a look at pics and give their tuppence worth on its authenticity? thanks


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 993 ✭✭✭Time


    TomasMacR wrote: »
    stumbled across this thread, has me wondering now...bought a watch for my old man off Chrono24. Omega, paid a good bit for it. Anyone care to take a look at pics and give their tuppence worth on its authenticity? thanks

    Put up some good quality pics (use macro mode if your camera has it) and someone here will be able to give you an idea of whether its real or fake


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 262 ✭✭TomasMacR


    Time wrote: »
    Put up some good quality pics (use macro mode if your camera has it) and someone here will be able to give you an idea of whether its real or fake

    tLN9bNf.jpg

    DGAZPDK.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,149 ✭✭✭893bet


    What’s the reference number?

    Also it looks like a serial number is printed on one of the lugs. I can just about see it.

    Googling this will often reveal a lot about a watch (less hits the better).


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 262 ✭✭TomasMacR


    893bet wrote: »
    What’s the reference number?

    Also it looks like a serial number is printed on one of the mugs. I can just about see it.

    Googling this will often reveal a lot about a watch (less hits the better).

    Ref is 48323132.

    I don't understand what you mean by serial number printed on one of the mugs?


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,170 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Probably got "lugs" turned into "mugs" by spellcheck T.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,149 ✭✭✭893bet


    TomasMacR wrote: »
    Ref is 48323132.

    I don't understand what you mean by serial number printed on one of the mugs?

    Sorry meant on the lugs. Typo. Number printed in tiny print on back of watch.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 262 ✭✭TomasMacR


    ah ok...I wouldn't have understood lugs either being honest :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,325 ✭✭✭scott1974




  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 262 ✭✭TomasMacR


    893bet wrote: »
    Sorry meant on the lugs. Typo. Number printed in tiny print on back of watch.

    christ...no idea how you spotted that:eek:. had it right up to my face and thought it was a scratch until I took a photo and zoomed in. fair play. I take it this is a good sign?

    38gllEN.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,149 ✭✭✭893bet


    TomasMacR wrote: »
    christ...no idea how you spotted that:eek:. had it right up to my face and thought it was a scratch until I took a photo and zoomed in. fair play. I take it this is a good sign?

    No hits when you google it is good!

    Watch looks ok but not familiar with the model.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 993 ✭✭✭Time


    893bet wrote: »
    No hits when you google it is good!

    Watch looks ok but not familiar with the model.

    It’s an omega deville prestige, but I’m not sure of what the reference it is. Most of them have Roman numerals rather than just indices


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 993 ✭✭✭Time


    OmegaGene wrote: »
    Indices are quite common
    Nice watch enjoy :-)

    The reference is 4832.31.32. I can’t see anything obviously wrong with it anyway. I’m not a Roman numerals guy personally, maybe in 10 years when I’m in my 40s but I feel like they’re too old looking


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 262 ✭✭TomasMacR


    Many thanks to all of you for verification which would’ve cost me. I bought it off a Dutch guy on Chrono24 who seemed very genuine (yes I know). He had no box but had the papers/cards with the wallet. Sent me scans of his passport and utility bills before buying. One thing he said which was interesting was, the cut that Chrono24 take for the secure purchase is meaningless. Basically, if you organise the secure sale where the recipient has to sign for the item, it amounts to nothing as the seller can choose the shipment method, so basically the seller can send a box through UPS etc with a plastic swatch watch inside for what you think is your new Rolex...once you’ve signed without opening Chrono24 are off the hook. As far as they are concerned, you’ve signed and are happy with the goods and if you go back to them you’ve no comeback...so we went through PayPal, no charge additional charge with Chrono24.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 993 ✭✭✭Time


    TomasMacR wrote: »
    Many thanks to all of you for verification which would’ve cost me. I bought it off a Dutch guy on Chrono24 who seemed very genuine (yes I know). He had no box but had the papers/cards with the wallet. Sent me scans of his passport and utility bills before buying. One thing he said which was interesting was, the cut that Chrono24 take for the secure purchase is meaningless. Basically, if you organise the secure sale where the recipient has to sign for the item, it amounts to nothing as the seller can choose the shipment method, so basically the seller can send a box through UPS etc with a plastic swatch watch inside for what you think is your new Rolex...once you’ve signed without opening Chrono24 are off the hook. As far as they are concerned, you’ve signed and are happy with the goods and if you go back to them you’ve no comeback...so we went through PayPal, no charge additional charge with Chrono24.

    As they say “buy the seller”. The whole C24 guaranteed thing is well known to be useless but there’s a ton of reputable sellers on there. Boxes and papers can be faked too so not having them in reality means very little


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 262 ✭✭TomasMacR


    OmegaGene wrote: »
    As far as I’m aware chrono24 hold the funds until the buyer is happy and then the funds are released, otherwise empty boxes would be turning up left right and centre

    It’s held in escrow which is automated when you sign for it, it goes. It’s happening a lot, he warned me of it...he flips watches and had good feedback and I took a risky punt on it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 456 ✭✭oxocube




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,149 ✭✭✭893bet


    https://www.adverts.ie/17539814

    Possible it’s real. No hits from the serial number.

    But the feedback coupled with the fake omega in the withdrawn adds.....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 993 ✭✭✭Time


    893bet wrote: »
    https://www.adverts.ie/17539814

    Possible it’s real. No hits from the serial number.

    But the feedback coupled with the fake omega in the withdrawn adds.....

    All that guy sells is fakes, no way would i touch this. I notice that a lot of the fakes are listed with addresses in more working class areas, and usually the sellers are selling . So for me any luxury watch listed with an address in finglas etc.. is immediately suspicious. The reality is in areas like that people generally can't afford a rolex, never mind a rolex, several pairs of high end shoes, and two or three canada goose jackets.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,808 ✭✭✭micks_address


    OmegaGene wrote: »
    wow thats a bold sweeping statement, fair enough the watch is a shi55ter and the seller is a scum bag trying to con people but to say an entire working class areas residents cant afford a rolex etc is absolute crap

    Id agree with you but I do wonder sometimes when I see expensive items listed in area's that might have bad rep re crime etc. Another thing I've noticed is seller's listing watches in area's they don't live in which I find odd. I'll message them for an item listed in eg swords and they will say they are based in dundrum..


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 262 ✭✭TomasMacR


    Time wrote: »
    All that guy sells is fakes, no way would i touch this. I notice that a lot of the fakes are listed with addresses in more working class areas, and usually the sellers are selling . So for me any luxury watch listed with an address in finglas etc.. is immediately suspicious. The reality is in areas like that people generally can't afford a rolex, never mind a rolex, several pairs of high end shoes, and two or three canada goose jackets.

    Wtf. Plenty of people in Finglas who are cash rich and have a lot more disposable income than those that live in affluent areas. Not to mention, seeing as you are generalising, all those peasants in Finglas are more than likely involved in crime and expensive goods which are small such as jewellery and watches are often purchased and used to launder cash ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 993 ✭✭✭Time


    TomasMacR wrote: »
    Wtf. Plenty of people in Finglas who are cash rich and have a lot more disposable income than those that live in affluent areas. Not to mention, seeing as you are generalising, all those peasants in Finglas are more than likely involved in crime and expensive goods which are small such as jewellery and watches are often purchased and used to launder cash ;)

    Look i wouldn't assume that nobody in those areas is able to afford luxury watches but the fact is its far far less likely that they can. Thats not a generalisation its a fact that can be verified by looking at income distribution on the CSO maps. Couple that with profiles that have large amounts of luxury goods that are regularly counterfeited and its reasonable to have suspicions.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement