Microwave Interfacing With Humans

Fionn1952 wrote: »

I thought I'd give a hand to move the narrative along in here.

Ok, I'll bite.

Fionn1952 wrote: »

Going through the first link, there are absolutely no links to scientific papers. The author of the blog repeatedly refers to research, but does not link to it, and makes it clear that it's his own research. It's circular logic to use your own non peer-reviewed, 'research' to support an argument in favour of what you set out to prove with said research.

I would agree with you if it were not for the fact that this first article was written in response to attacks on diplomatic staff in Cuba and China, prior to any released reported. The article was the first to publicly identify the sound as a result of microwave interfacing.


As you will learn, if you read up on the latest research, even those professionals not privy to the nature of the weapon have since concluded that it was microwave-based and that the sound was a product of that.


So, that would place DeepThought more than a year ahead of the public investigation and, perhaps, ahead of the FBI who were still claiming it was an absurd device called a sonic weapon.


So, anyone reading that would be ahead of the pack.

Fionn1952 wrote: »

Even ignoring that, his research seems to consist entirely of anecdotal evidence from unnamed sources, and his own extrapolations as to what that means. Clearly below the standard of research Spooner has implied was contained within the material.

Its par for the course when dealing with many things in the world of intelligence. What you're more interested in is, given the tech, do these things sound plausible? If so, its a given someone will be trying this. The military applications are obvious.

Fionn1952 wrote: »

For example he makes the claim, "However, after nearly a decade of research alongside input by various specialists, former government agents, whistleblowers spanning the entire world the rather disturbing conclusion that we were looking at some form of microwave weapon".....with no reference to the actual research carried out, or a single one of his sources.

DeepThought is very well known, as his investigation series, having started on Newsvine in 2010. The comments are littered with conversations and information about the system, spanning many years. There is no doubt he did exactly what he claimed. The articles are probably more geared towards those that dig into things, rather than those that need spoon fed like a baby and every claim proved.

Fionn1952 wrote: »

He claims, 'It took many years, but I eventually developed a range of workable theories on the transceiver technology.' without providing any schematics on his theoretical designs or even the most basic information beyond his claim.

He does discuss the technology and principles of operation later in the series. This was a large portion of the work begun around 2010. It has been iterated over many times in the last decade in light of new information and his own improved understanding. The current speculated design he has is quite functional.

Fionn1952 wrote: »

He follows up with, "From clear localised heating, to RF interference in SDR equipment, from RF burns to clear beams passing through rooms, I got to see it all. Rather than being timid, withdrawing and maintaining cover, I observed a system that was blatant and aggressive." once more failing to give actual results or data.

Over the years, he has uploaded everything from photographs of RF burns, to raw IQ data on intercepted signals, as well as waterfall plots, etc. Much of that was done prior to 2013 though. He seems to have focused more on the AGI, theory of mind and psyops after that. I think its all about making AGI less gullible. But he still keeps tabs on the microwave stuff.

Fionn1952 wrote: »

I could literally write a blog tomorrow, with all the scientific accuracy and authority of this blog, I'll claim that Spooner is actually a covert government agent, posting easily discredited nonsense about microwave weaponry to distract us from the REAL truth about them, which I've researched since 2006, I worked with COUNTLESS microwave physics researchers, government researchers and a highly prestigious US university, who have turned double agent just to provide me this information, and we have concluded that they're using these microwave beams to make me, personally put on weight. I can only conclude that I am incredibly special, and that's why I'm being targeted.

I doubt it. I don't need to take his work on faith like yourself. I can validate if the interface is functional, the rest is just human nature, isn't it?

Fionn1952 wrote: »

You've possibly been taken in by a veneer of scientific language, but there's precisely zero actual science in this blog post. It doesn't inspire much faith that the remaining links will contain much in the ways of proper research.

The science comes later. I think these descriptions are more for people who get it and need to understand what mentality they are dealing with, as well as operational use cases. I suppose how it is used, or how it is to be used as well as understanding the depths these people will go to, is a good guide.


I suppose he doesn't waste time with people trying to prove the interface, he just says, there it is. If you can't understand it, or don't want to understand it, that's your problem. Obviously, there are people out there who are paid to both get it and not get it.

Fionn1952 wrote: »

Perhaps if you could narrow it down for me and let me know which of the blog posts contain actual research, I could have a look at some actual data before going back to read the author's conclusions? If you're very familiar with the author's work, it should be almost no effort whatsoever for you to tell me one or two of the blog posts which focus on hard data. When I've had a read through these, then we can move on to the conclusionary side of the discussion?

You seem to have the same reading disability. Is it contagious in these forums? You can't debate something you have no read. Don't be daft. If you want to join in, take some time out and read.

Fionn1952 wrote: »

So essentially it's just appeal to authority, a gish gallop and ad hominem?

Perhaps you're familiar with the concept of the burden of proof?

Perhaps those using the microwave weapons are also familiar with the term?