Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

BusConnects Dublin - Bus Network Changes Discussion

1910121415257

Comments

  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,986 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Stephen15 wrote: »
    Yes but there are 2xx routes in Dublin such as the 220 or the 270.

    Sorry, I totally forgot that, you are absolutely right. Cork city services most be using 201 to 219 or something like that.

    The point is though that the NTA are now using a nationwide system with unique numbering, so some of your suggested numbers are already taken.

    Perhaps they could use a different numbering range for your orbital routes. Or perhaps shift all Dublin Buses up to the 1xxx range.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,342 ✭✭✭markpb


    devnull wrote: »
    The Leap 90 product is much better than Travel 90 in my opinion and a far larger number of customers are availing of it compared to the Travel 90, because the Travel 90 required you to constantly keep buying new tickets whereas the Leap 90 product is built in to the leap card and at least with my fellow colleagues over the past few years, far more of them use a mix of transport modes than two buses.

    Travel 90 could have been implemented on the Leap Card. I'm not sure why that decided to change it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,491 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    bk wrote: »
    The 2xx range is used for buses in Cork. I believe that the NTA are now operating a consistent route numbering system through the whole country now.
    There has been shenanigans - when Sligo town services were re-cast, they became S1 and S2.
    It was only two years ago or so that they shifted the bus numbers in Cork from example 5 to 205, 8 to 208, etc.
    No, 2XX has been used for more than a decade.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,686 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    markpb wrote: »
    Travel 90 could have been implemented on the Leap Card. I'm not sure why that decided to change it.

    Presumably because they believed that an integrated product that didn't penalize people for changing modes was a better option rather than one which uses just one mode?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,907 ✭✭✭Stephen15


    bk wrote: »
    The point is though that the NTA are now using a nationwide system with unique numbering, so some of your suggested numbers are already taken.

    Perhaps they could use a different numbering range for your orbital routes. Or perhaps shift all Dublin Buses up to the 1xxx range.

    Yes but as an OP mentioned Dublin Bus are currently exempt from the nationwide numbering system.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,986 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Victor wrote: »
    No, 2XX has been used for more than a decade.

    I meant that the city buses in Cork were only moved from 3, 8, etc. to 203, 208 in the last few years.
    Stephen15 wrote: »
    Yes but as an OP mentioned Dublin Bus are currently exempt from the nationwide numbering system.

    I don't think they are "exempt", more of a case that the NTA seemed to have been focusing on making the changes to the rest of the country first, before tackling DB route numbering. Or perhaps more just of a case of Dublin Buses having the 1 to 199 range, as that what they traditionally had and they are the largest operator.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,031 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    You don't understand what I was saying.

    The old system db had was you travel on as many db services as you wished in the 90 minutes and also worked on xpresso services which made it very cheap at the time.

    Obviously it was only db but it was better then the nta leap €1 off.

    But that alas is changing so no need to be worrying about it with all the new changes coming.
    Ah ok yes I misunderstood, the "old" T90 was indeed better than the discount and much closer to integrated fares (but as you rightly point out, only for DB). What we are getting appears to finally be integrated fares, the most overdue development in Irish public transport history (yes, above even metro or DART upgrades!)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,973 ✭✭✭RayM


    Bambi wrote: »
    The old CIE cream and navy was probably the most aesthetically pleasing combination

    I'm not sure how well it would look on today's buses. Although that old CIE logo was a fantastic design. Can't understand why they got rid of it.

    418937.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,924 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    bk wrote: »
    I meant that the city buses in Cork were only moved from 3, 8, etc. to 203, 208 in the last few years.



    I don't think they are "exempt", more of a case that the NTA seemed to have been focusing on making the changes to the rest of the country first, before tackling DB route numbering. Or perhaps more just of a case of Dublin Buses having the 1 to 199 range, as that what they traditionally had and they are the largest operator.

    Read my post again above bk - the Dublin City bus routes are in a completely independent numbering sequence. They bear no relation to the national numbering which gives the route numbers below 100 to Expressway. It all reverts to who operated the services originally - CIE Dublin City Services or CIE Provincial Services.

    Indeed the Dublin City numbering is based initially on the tram routes, and from 30 upwards goes in an anti-clockwise sequence across the north city and then clockwise across the south city until it becomes completely random - look at a bus timetable from the 1960s or 1970s and this will become obvious!

    Outside of Dublin the route numbering follows the BE numbering system more or less. If you go back through old CIE provincial bus timetables you'll see that while routes didn't display numbers, the timetables did have table numbers, which correspond to today's route numbers.

    There was always a gap from 200 to 220, which was for the Cork City Services which like those in Limerick, Galway and Waterford used numbers from 1 to 20 rather the 2xx, 3xx, 4xx and 6xx numbers reserved for them.

    It's more of a quirk of history than anything else.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,694 Mod ✭✭✭✭dfx-


    lxflyer wrote: »
    Probably either a staffing issue (no driver to take over in the city centre) or running time issue (bus is running late due to traffic).


    If the latter - it needs new rosters (as has been introduced on the 1 and 75) to deal with it.

    Absolutely no doubt it could be any number of key structural issues, but it sort of says it all about where the problems lie, rather than the BusConnects solutions. It is a regular problem, so it's not a particular driver or type of bus or how many doors it has (last night my bus was SG270, newest in the fleet, may as well have been an AV).

    I know drivers who drive the 13 as overtime in Harristown and hate it above all other routes (slightly more than the 4 and 15) mostly being too long and too busy. God help the regular drivers.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,907 ✭✭✭Stephen15


    So decided that since I have too much time on my hands I would make out how current and future DB routes would under my proposal. Im only including all day DB routes and no peak time only services or xpresso routes.

    BRT Routes
    1- Blanch to UCD
    2- Tallaght to Clongriffin
    3- Swords to CC

    Routes serving CC
    10- Santry to Sandymount
    11- Sandyford to Wadelai Park
    12- Harristown to Monkstown
    13- Harristown to Grangecastle
    14- Beaumont to Dundrum
    15- Clongriffin to Ballycullen Road
    16- Ballinteer to The Airport
    17- Mountjoy Square to Cherrywood
    18- Mountjoy Square to Loughlinstown
    19- Harristown to Kimmage
    20- Parnell Street to Ashtown
    21- Driminagh to Ashington
    22- Ringsend to Citywest
    23- Kilnamanagh to Marino
    24- Aston Quay to Park West
    25- Merrion Square to Dodsboro
    26- Merrion Square to Palmerstown
    27- Clarehall to Jobstown
    28- Eden Quay to Harristown
    29- Abbey Street to Baldoyle
    30- Abbey Street to Castle Avenue
    31- Talbot Street to Howth (31)
    32- Talbot Street to Malahide
    33- Abbey Street to Balbriggan
    34- Hawkins Street to Rathcoole
    35- Aston Quay to Spiddal Park
    36- Harristown to Kimmage
    37- Baggot Street to Blanchardstown Centre
    38- Burlington Road to Damastown (38)
    39- Burlington Road to Ongar
    40- Charlestown to Liffey Valley
    41- Abbey Street to Rolestown
    42- Talbot Street to Portmarnock
    43- Talbot to Swords Buisness Pk.
    44- Larkill to Enniskerry
    45- Ballywaltrim to Hueston
    46- Dun Laoghaire to Phoenix Pk.
    47- Belarmine to Fleet Street
    48- Burlington Road to Damastown (38a)
    49- Pearse Street to The Square
    50- Fleet Street to Rossmore
    51- Docklands to Foxborough
    52- Eden Quay to Blunden Drive
    53- Abbey Street to Ferryport
    54- Pearse to Kiltipper Way
    55- Burlington Road to Damastown (38a)
    56- Ringsend to The Square
    57- Burlington Road to Damastown (38a)
    58- Parnell Street to Toberburr
    59- Parnell Street to Tyrellstown
    60- Talbot Street to Howth (31b)
    61- Eden Quay to Whitechurch
    62- Merrion Square to Leixlip (Captains Hill)
    63- Merrion Square to Leixlip (Castletown)
    64- Poolbeg Street to Citywest
    65- Poolbeg Stret to Blessington
    66- Merrion Square to Maynooth (66)
    67- Merrion Square to Maynooth (67)
    68- Fleet Street to Newcastle
    69- Fleet Street to Rathcoole
    70- Burlington Road to Dunboyne

    Orbital Routes
    101- Dun Laoghaire to Baldoyle
    102- Sutton to The Airport
    103- Ranelagh to Drumcondra
    104- UCD to Blanchardstown
    105- Dun Laoghaire to The Square
    106- Chapelizod to The Square
    107- Rialto to Blackrock
    108- Palmerstown to Sandymount
    109- Blanchardstown Centre to Kilbarrack

    Local routes
    201- Dun Laoghaire to Kilmacanogue
    202- Dun Laoghaire to Killiney
    203- Dun Laoghaire to Kilternan
    204- Clontarf to DCU
    205- Brides Glen to Dun Laoghaire
    206- Ticknock to Blackrock
    207- Blackrock to Newcastle
    208- Bray to Newtownmountkennedy
    209- Bray to Enniskerry
    210- Ballymun to Ladyswell Road
    211- Blanchardstown to Damastown
    212- Tyrellstown to Ladyswell Road
    213- Blanchardstown to Liffey Valley
    214- Blanchardstown to Dunboyne

    I probably missed a few routes in there. Anyway thats how I would go about renumbering DB routes. I have not included routes which will be pointless after BRT is introduced such the 39a and the 41.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,907 ✭✭✭Stephen15


    RayM wrote: »
    I'm not sure how well it would look on today's buses. Although that old CIE logo was a fantastic design. Can't understand why they got rid of it.

    418937.png

    I think it looks quite well tbh altough I'm not mad about the flying snail. I think theyd be better off using the current TFI logo. I reckon a touch of green would look well and help modernise it a bit


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,002 ✭✭✭✭Spanish Eyes


    Just another thing, timetables. Yes the timings on them are weird sometimes. I though ND was to iron them out.

    You know what I mean, leaving at 08.03, 08.17 etc. as an example. why not on the hour and every five ten fifteen minutes afterwards for consistency. Maybe if all the buses have the same timetable they will crash bang wallop into each other every morning and evening though!

    Just being a little lighthearted on this Bank Holiday Friday.

    I agree that the bus numbers need to be sorted. All Northside originators that cross CC should have odd numbers like the post code, opposite on the South side.

    BRT different sequence.

    Orbital another. and so on.

    I get that the tram system was the originator of many of DB's numbers, but the trams have been gone since 1949 or thereabouts! Shame really.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,644 ✭✭✭✭punisher5112


    So is the colour going to be the one I've seen on private coaches with tfi and circles in blue and green??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,924 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    dfx- wrote: »
    Absolutely no doubt it could be any number of key structural issues, but it sort of says it all about where the problems lie, rather than the BusConnects solutions. It is a regular problem, so it's not a particular driver or type of bus or how many doors it has (last night my bus was SG270, newest in the fleet, may as well have been an AV).

    I know drivers who drive the 13 as overtime in Harristown and hate it above all other routes (slightly more than the 4 and 15) mostly being too long and too busy. God help the regular drivers.

    Being honest many of the issues that arise with the Dublin Bus service are not macro ones (I accept that stuff like ticketing and consequently dwell time is a serious macro issue), but rather more micro ones like:
    * getting the running times on the rosters that support the timetable wrong, and not correcting them in a timely period,
    * poorly designed timetables that don't give proper headways mid-route,
    * not marrying the driver Boards with the AVLC timetables (driver changes or official waiting times mid-route not reflected correctly in the latter),
    * not dealing with route variations correctly on AVLC, etc

    These are things that, while detailed in nature, are the very things that make the service look bad and which DB have a very poor history of getting right.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,924 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    So is the colour going to be the one I've seen on private coaches with tfi and circles in blue and green??

    As Victor posted above, nothing has been decided yet.

    Liveries, routes, fares - final decisions after consultations.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,924 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Just another thing, timetables. Yes the timings on them are weird sometimes. I though ND was to iron them out.

    You know what I mean, leaving at 08.03, 08.17 etc. as an example. why not on the hour and every five ten fifteen minutes afterwards for consistency. Maybe if all the buses have the same timetable they will crash bang wallop into each other every morning and evening though!

    Just being a little lighthearted on this Bank Holiday Friday.

    I agree that the bus numbers need to be sorted. All Northside originators that cross CC should have odd numbers like the post code, opposite on the South side.

    BRT different sequence.

    Orbital another. and so on.

    I get that the tram system was the originator of many of DB's numbers, but the trams have been gone since 1949 or thereabouts! Shame really.

    Bear in mind that on some corridors there are integrated timetables so oddities like you raise above will happen.

    The 26, 66/a/b and 67 timetables outbound are integrated to give 8 buses an hour as far as Palmerstown (that's a bus every 7-8 minutes)(26 & 67 every 30 mins and 66/a/b combined every 15 mins). Some other corridors are similar and that's where you'll get oddball times.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,907 ✭✭✭Stephen15


    Just another thing, timetables. Yes the timings on them are weird sometimes. I though ND was to iron them out.

    You know what I mean, leaving at 08.03, 08.17 etc. as an example. why not on the hour and every five ten fifteen minutes afterwards for consistency. Maybe if all the buses have the same timetable they will crash bang wallop into each other every morning and evening though!

    Just being a little lighthearted on this Bank Holiday Friday.

    I agree that the bus numbers need to be sorted. All Northside originators that cross CC should have odd numbers like the post code, opposite on the South side.

    BRT different sequence.

    Orbital another. and so on.

    I get that the tram system was the originator of many of DB's numbers, but the trams have been gone since 1949 or thereabouts! Shame really.

    See my post. I actually believe similar routes that have numbers that are less in common are better as then people wont get confused as easily


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,644 ✭✭✭✭punisher5112


    lxflyer wrote: »
    As Victor posted above, nothing has been decided yet.

    Liveries, routes, fares - final decisions after consultations.

    Ah right I thought I had missed something. Thanks.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,924 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Ah right I thought I had missed something. Thanks.

    Everything in the brochure is purely indicative of what *may* happen - what the final outcome is may be different.

    Time will tell, as will the consultations!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,491 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    You know what I mean, leaving at 08.03, 08.17 etc. as an example. why not on the hour and every five ten fifteen minutes afterwards for consistency.
    Yes, consistency is useful, but service needs to match demand and funding.
    I agree that the bus numbers need to be sorted. All Northside originators that cross CC should have odd numbers like the post code, opposite on the South side.
    And cross city routes?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,342 ✭✭✭markpb


    devnull wrote: »
    Presumably because they believed that an integrated product that didn't penalize people for changing modes was a better option rather than one which uses just one mode?

    Travel 90, as a product, suited DB users who make up the vast majority of public transport users in Dublin.

    What we've ended up with is worse for DB customers and slightly better for everyone else. travel 90 could have been moved to Leap and extended to cover more/all operators. That would have been amazing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,644 ✭✭✭✭punisher5112


    markpb wrote: »
    Travel 90, as a product, suited DB users who make up the vast majority of public transport users in Dublin.

    What we've ended up with is worse for DB customers and slightly better for everyone else. travel 90 could have been moved to Leap and extended to cover more/all operators. That would have been amazing.


    They have been slow to change but it is coming so no stress.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,986 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    markpb wrote: »
    Travel 90, as a product, suited DB users who make up the vast majority of public transport users in Dublin.

    What we've ended up with is worse for DB customers and slightly better for everyone else. travel 90 could have been moved to Leap and extended to cover more/all operators. That would have been amazing.

    Travel 90 was better for the small number of DB users who actually knew about it and actually went to the bother to buy tickets for it.

    Leap 90 and fare capping are better because they not only apply to DB, but also because they apply automatically to all Leap card users even if they don't know it!

    I have no proof of it, but I suspect more people benefit from Leap 90 and fare capping then people who benefited from Travel 90.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,686 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    markpb wrote: »
    Travel 90 could have been moved to Leap and extended to cover more/all operators. That would have been amazing.

    That would not have been possible without a massive impact on farebox revenue for multiple companies as the fare is having to be split across multiple operators which apparently was one of the reasons why it wasn't extended.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,644 ✭✭✭✭punisher5112


    bk wrote: »
    Travel 90 was better for the small number of DB users who actually knew about it and actually went to the bother to buy tickets for it.

    Leap 90 and fare capping are better because they not only apply to DB, but also because they apply automatically to all Leap card users even if they don't know it!

    I have no proof of it, but I suspect more people benefit from Leap 90 and fare capping then people who benefited from Travel 90.

    More would benefit of course but many still don't even understand or know it actually does it all auto and many know nothing about any of it.

    People always complained about huge fares and there were always them other options that could make a good saving.
    Well for many years.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,907 ✭✭✭Stephen15


    People always complained about huge fares and there were always them other options that could make a good saving.
    Well for many years.

    Well compared to other countries fares our fares are high when when T90 was scrapped it was what €2.90 for an unlimited ticket for 90 mins and it was only valid on buses. Compare that to a city I visited recently Rome where an unlimited 90 minute ticket valid all buses, trams, metro and suburban rail cost €1.50.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 6,522 Mod ✭✭✭✭Irish Steve


    Slightly sad, I've skimmed through nearly 600 messages, and what's missing for me in most of it is the bigger picture, in that nothing's been said about issues like the interaction between Dublin Bus and Bus Eireann, which for people in places like Ashbourne, Dunshaughlin and other places around Dublin is a major issue, in that for most of those areas, there's one , or if they are lucky 2 routes, and they only serve Busaras, which makes working in vast swathes of Dublin impossible, because of the time involved in going into the centre and out again.

    For me, the lack of any integrated rail in much of the city centre is a massive issue, we spent a long weekend recently in Hamburg, which is not dissimilar in size or population to Dublin, but they have a much bigger rail network, both above and below ground, and in some areas both, with a very impressive service quality, the most evident aspect of that being the airport, which has a train to the city centre every 10 minutes, 8 coach train, so significant capacity, and it links with a significant number of other areas on the way in, and runs for 20 of the 24 hours in the day.

    What I think is going to have to happen in the longer term is that the city inside of the canals will need to have a much higher LUAS style service, with the buses providing a feed into the LUAS that will serve the centre, simply because one LUAS style tram can carry a massive number of people when compared to a bus, and at peak periods, the critical issue to to move a lot of people quickly, and a LUAS style system, or an orbital underground can do that, but multiple buses cannot, because the dwell time is just too long in comparison to the time needed for the train equivalent.

    In the same vein, there needs to be oribital feeder systems that link places like Clare Hall, the Airport, Blanchardstown, Liffey Valley, Red Cow, Dundrum, Sandyford and Dun Laoghaire, or similar, with high frequency feeds from the areas around the interchanges. At one time, there was a plan to do this with a rail service, but that seems to have been killed off, but it's going to have to be revisited at some stage, for all sorts of reasons, the biggest being the inability to upgrade the M50 to the size that is now needed, an acceptable, reliable and fast alternative is going to be needed sooner rather than later.

    The ticketing systems need to allow for any service to be used within a zone without issue, in Hamburg they have rail, bus and ferry services that are all part of an integrated ticketing system, with options for zone travel, or day travel, or commuter season tickets for longer distances, and there is no issue about changing from one to the other, or using different routes, if you are in a zone and have paid to travel in it, then that's what you can do, and it works very well indeed.

    The key issue for me is if the right questions are being asked in this review, and if the brief of the people who will be producing the final report gives them the scope to address all of the issues related to public transport, or if the review will only focus on dealing with the bus services in Dublin to the exclusion of all other transport options.

    Time will tell, but 25 years of watching the snail's pace of transport reform in Dublin does not fill me with optimism.

    Shore, if it was easy, everybody would be doin it.😁



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr



    For me, the lack of any integrated rail in much of the city centre is a massive issue, we spent a long weekend recently in Hamburg, which is not dissimilar in size or population to Dublin, but they have a much bigger rail network, both above and below ground, and in some areas both, with a very impressive service quality, the most evident aspect of that being the airport, which has a train to the city centre every 10 minutes, 8 coach train, so significant capacity, and it links with a significant number of other areas on the way in, and runs for 20 of the 24 hours in the day. .

    We don't have metro systems because every rural TD and Minister can't stand the idea of investing in one unless every village in their county gets a bypass first.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,946 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    bk wrote: »
    Travel 90 was better for the small number of DB users who actually knew about it and actually went to the bother to buy tickets for it.

    Leap 90 and fare capping are better because they not only apply to DB, but also because they apply automatically to all Leap card users even if they don't know it!

    I have no proof of it, but I suspect more people benefit from Leap 90 and fare capping then people who benefited from Travel 90.

    Travel90 was fantastic when it first came out. The book of ten tickets. :) It was like DB were forced into the concept but didn't want anyone to know about it!

    The fact that it's now automatic as you say is great as well as the fact that it's not just restricted to DB.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,670 ✭✭✭IE 222


    The country needs to invest in tunnel boring machines for rail and some road tunnels. We need to quit this messing about of spending MILLIONS on upgrading and adding extra bus stops, ticketing systems and repainting buses thinking this is going to resolve Dublins transport issues.

    Even with a reduction in private cars bus travel will remain slow. The addition of more stops and worst of all the ever increasing amount of traffic lights popping up anywhere and everywhere is out of control. For example from the end of the Finglas Rd at Hearts corner to the quays (roughly 1 mile) there is no less than 16 sets of traffic lights with a second Luas crossing soon to be added.

    Money needs to put into rail or removing / bypassing junctions. It's the same with the M50. Half of users use the junction to junction Lane as a mile long slip road the other half wait till the last min to change lanes leading to others having to slow down or even stop.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,907 ✭✭✭Stephen15


    Slightly sad, I've skimmed through nearly 600 messages, and what's missing for me in most of it is the bigger picture, in that nothing's been said about issues like the interaction between Dublin Bus and Bus Eireann, which for people in places like Ashbourne, Dunshaughlin and other places around Dublin is a major issue, in that for most of those areas, there's one , or if they are lucky 2 routes, and they only serve Busaras, which makes working in vast swathes of Dublin impossible, because of the time involved in going into the centre and out again.

    For me, the lack of any integrated rail in much of the city centre is a massive issue, we spent a long weekend recently in Hamburg, which is not dissimilar in size or population to Dublin, but they have a much bigger rail network, both above and below ground, and in some areas both, with a very impressive service quality, the most evident aspect of that being the airport, which has a train to the city centre every 10 minutes, 8 coach train, so significant capacity, and it links with a significant number of other areas on the way in, and runs for 20 of the 24 hours in the day.

    What I think is going to have to happen in the longer term is that the city inside of the canals will need to have a much higher LUAS style service, with the buses providing a feed into the LUAS that will serve the centre, simply because one LUAS style tram can carry a massive number of people when compared to a bus, and at peak periods, the critical issue to to move a lot of people quickly, and a LUAS style system, or an orbital underground can do that, but multiple buses cannot, because the dwell time is just too long in comparison to the time needed for the train equivalent.

    In the same vein, there needs to be oribital feeder systems that link places like Clare Hall, the Airport, Blanchardstown, Liffey Valley, Red Cow, Dundrum, Sandyford and Dun Laoghaire, or similar, with high frequency feeds from the areas around the interchanges. At one time, there was a plan to do this with a rail service, but that seems to have been killed off, but it's going to have to be revisited at some stage, for all sorts of reasons, the biggest being the inability to upgrade the M50 to the size that is now needed, an acceptable, reliable and fast alternative is going to be needed sooner rather than later.

    The ticketing systems need to allow for any service to be used within a zone without issue, in Hamburg they have rail, bus and ferry services that are all part of an integrated ticketing system, with options for zone travel, or day travel, or commuter season tickets for longer distances, and there is no issue about changing from one to the other, or using different routes, if you are in a zone and have paid to travel in it, then that's what you can do, and it works very well indeed.

    The key issue for me is if the right questions are being asked in this review, and if the brief of the people who will be producing the final report gives them the scope to address all of the issues related to public transport, or if the review will only focus on dealing with the bus services in Dublin to the exclusion of all other transport options.

    Time will tell, but 25 years of watching the snail's pace of transport reform in Dublin does not fill me with optimism.

    Firstly Fair play for going to the trouble of taking to write up a good well constructed post.

    I can see where your coming from about Bus Eireann and DB but that is changing with the the increasing amount of NTA control over the two companies although this is being blocked by unions if your a BE user I can be sure your well to fimilar with the misery they've caused you as of late anyway differant argument for a different time. The thing is many DB only commuters have to do the exact same thing to go to certain parts of the city for example I live in Dun Laoghaire and want to go to Swords impossible without having to first go into the CC first.

    In fairness Hamburg is a fair bit bigger than Dublin. Hamburg Metro Population: 5 million, Dublin Metro Population: 1.9 million. So a considerable difference really. I think there are better comparisions.

    On the subject of orbital transport my belief is that we really need to get rid of private vehicles from the cc and encourage them to use the M50 and Port Tunnel or use public transport to get into the cc. We should be looking to ban cars from the cc.

    There should be more rail really speaking. My belief is that overground heavy rail solutions would work better for Dublin than a metro as Dublin is quite a sprawling city. We should expanding our Dart network out to places like Maynooth, Drogheda, Navan, Newbridge and Wicklow Town. The Luas does a good job and it'll be great when the cross city section is fully complete.

    The ticketing system has improved with the introduction of Leap but I agree there is room for improvement.

    BRT is good cheaper solution to rail it might not have the same capacity but it dosen't get caught in traffic or have riddiculous dwell times like current buses.

    I wouldn't change over the last 25 years has been at a snails pace. We now two Luas lines with one soon to be finished expanding. Dart extensions to Malahide and Greystones. A new intagrated ticketing system. Some improvements to the bus network such as Rtpi and despite what some may tell network direct did improve some routes. Improvements to commuter rail which was nearly non- existant 25 years ago with the reopening of Phoenix Park Tunnel, introduction of 8 car trains, double tracking of Maynooth line, new trains, new lines like the M3 Parkway line, improvements to stations and the opening of new station. So to suggest that pt in Dublin has more or less stayed the same in the last 25 years is a little rich. Just because there haven't been flashy new Metros or Dart Undergrounds built dosen't mean things haven't in 25 years.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,694 Mod ✭✭✭✭dfx-


    lxflyer wrote: »
    Being honest many of the issues that arise with the Dublin Bus service are not macro ones (I accept that stuff like ticketing and consequently dwell time is a serious macro issue), but rather more micro ones like:
    * getting the running times on the rosters that support the timetable wrong, and not correcting them in a timely period,
    * poorly designed timetables that don't give proper headways mid-route,
    * not marrying the driver Boards with the AVLC timetables (driver changes or official waiting times mid-route not reflected correctly in the latter),
    * not dealing with route variations correctly on AVLC, etc

    These are things that, while detailed in nature, are the very things that make the service look bad and which DB have a very poor history of getting right.

    If they could sort out the Network Direct cuts and 30 minute frequencies on major routes, that would be a major help above all else.

    Trying to service a network created by Network Direct in order to cut services and make other routes 'cover' the gaping holes left behind is a battle you can never win.

    Tonight, a 27 and 77A (10pm, 30 minute frequencies) both inbound together in Tallaght Village both busy after the match. The 77A route is ten minutes longer than the 27, yet it got to the city first. That should not happen and does not get resolved by tickets or doors or BRTs or new liveries or corridors.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,235 ✭✭✭lucernarian


    Stephen15 wrote: »

    I wouldn't change over the last 25 years has been at a snails pace. We now two Luas lines with one soon to be finished expanding. Dart extensions to Malahide and Greystones. A new intagrated ticketing system. Some improvements to the bus network such as Rtpi and despite what some may tell network direct did improve some routes. Improvements to commuter rail which was nearly non- existant 25 years ago with the reopening of Phoenix Park Tunnel, introduction of 8 car trains, double tracking of Maynooth line, new trains, new lines like the M3 Parkway line, improvements to stations and the opening of new station. So to suggest that pt in Dublin has more or less stayed the same in the last 25 years is a little rich. Just because there haven't been flashy new Metros or Dart Undergrounds built dosen't mean things haven't in 25 years.
    The double tracking of Maynooth was only from Clonsilla to Maynooth, and only one level crossing has been removed in recent times. The M3 parkway line was not exactly new as it was on an existing alignment, which the recently-built M3 itself actually more or less destroyed further towards Navan. That and Meath County Council's water pipe.

    The integrated ticketing system is a do-minimum effort which is actually resulting in slower interactions with passengers on dublin buses, than the old ticketing and cash it has tried to replace.

    The 8-Car stations, particularly in the case of DART, were a consequence of foolish cutbacks to proper plans, by FF around 1980, I thought.

    The opening of Clontarf Road is more a tragedy considering the slowly rusting and unfit-for-purpose station that was built in the boom times. And at a location far enough away from everything to be almost pointless, compared to the original Clontarf Station.

    Adamstown station has a lot of potential but again it's located far away from existing housing.

    Clongriffin was a decent enough job, but its potential remains untapped and a passing loop on the eastern side has still been left out.

    So almost despite ourselves, there have been modest improvements.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,551 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    only one level crossing has been removed in recent times.

    One could be removed in the morning if the Taoiseach-elect didn't feel so worried about his seat as to protect it due to a few moaning mammies who don't want 200m added to their morning and evening drive to drop their sugar babies to school.

    Clontarf Road's Eastpoint purpose could be easily replaced by northbound exits from Connolly and allow moving the station further north. Having south-facing exits only and keeping the commuter entrance closed really hurts Connolly's catchment area. Forcing the gates on Sheriff Street to the side to be opened would even help a bit there (but not for Eastpoint)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,439 ✭✭✭StreetLight


    The Jarrett Walker consultation on the Dublin Bus network is due to be launched this morning.

    (from BreakingNews.ie) : http://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/public-asked-for-views-on-re-design-of-dublins-bus-network-792518.html

    "A consultation on the re-design of Dublin's bus network will be launched this morning.
    Dublin's public transport network is facing a number of challenges as the population in the city continues to rise and more people face long commutes.
    People will be able to have their say during the process with a detailed online survey launching later."


    More from the Jarrett Walker blog: http://humantransit.org/2017/06/dublin-imagine-a-better-bus-network-design.html


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,686 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,031 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    If this all comes to fruition then it slots nicely into any future underground lines we might build (yeah yeah, I know). You could "simply" replace a bus spine with an underground line.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,834 ✭✭✭thomasj




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,002 ✭✭✭✭Spanish Eyes


    There's a lot of reading in all that. Seems to be well researched. Will give me hours of pleasant reading later on ha ha.

    Just having skimmed it I wonder about bus connectivity to Luas Rail and DART. But maybe I missed that for now!

    At last a plan anyway.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,680 ✭✭✭TheChrisD


    I always scoffed at those people who were all "rabble rabble our local service will be cut with these plans" by not thinking of the bigger picture; but Page 51 and the suggestions of my 70 are making me rabble a bit inside 😔


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,387 ✭✭✭brokenarms


    Looks like the 24 hour thing is in the bin. Little demand for a bus after 11pm by their charts.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,907 ✭✭✭munchkin_utd


    TheChrisD wrote: »
    I always scoffed at those people who were all "rabble rabble our local service will be cut with these plans" by not thinking of the bigger picture; but Page 51 and the suggestions of my 70 are making me rabble a bit inside 😔
    Yea, but you're going from a direct service from Dunboyne to town every 60minutes compared to one every 10 minutes, with a change.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    thomasj wrote: »

    Appparently nearly all of dublin has a bus frequency of 9 minutes or better at midday on weekdays

    Sure why do we need a review at all if thats the case :rolleyes:

    Which begs the question was this report based on stats provided by dublin bus rather than old fashioned field work

    They're goosed from the get go if it was :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,229 ✭✭✭LeinsterDub


    brokenarms wrote: »
    Looks like the 24 hour thing is in the bin. Little demand for a bus after 11pm by their charts.

    Like there was little demand for a bus every hour to Cork?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,387 ✭✭✭brokenarms


    Like there was little demand for a bus every hour to Cork?

    I know from driving the last buses. I usually pick up no more than 1 or 2 peeps after 11.30 midweek. Waste of diesel TBH. Survey seems right .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,342 ✭✭✭markpb


    Like there was little demand for a bus every hour to Cork?

    Or on the Luas which is wedged at 00:30.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,229 ✭✭✭LeinsterDub


    brokenarms wrote: »
    I know from driving the last buses. I usually pick up no more than 1 or 2 peeps after 11.30 midweek. Waste of diesel TBH. Survey seems right .

    I'll either avoid town or say **** it I'm having a good time ill just get a taxi. I know a lot of people think the same way


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,085 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


    But there's a need for buses after 1130 alright... Just not on every single route. I don't get why this is ever in doubt.

    Has anyone seen the Lucan Road and N3 routes at that hour?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,491 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    Note that Nitelinks are now PSO services. I wonder if even a select few routes would get some late service during the week, e.g. 145, 16, 27, 13.


Advertisement