Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Rainbow Cup 2021

145679

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,499 ✭✭✭Sabre0001


    Some probably even more vocally :D

    🤪



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,142 ✭✭✭OldRio


    VayNiice wrote: »
    I wonder would the same people be calling it a farce of a competition if Munster had made it to the final?

    I'm delighted for the Italians. You can only play what's in front of you so they deserve to be in this final.

    In all honesty most have been calling it a farce since its inception.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    OldRio wrote: »
    In all honesty most have been calling it a farce since its inception.

    I'm not saying the Rainbow Cup wasn't a farce but the Pro14 was also a farce and if you look back at the season thread from 4-5 weeks in we were all saying it.

    In isolation, the RC from a sporting pov was not good but there seems to be some short memories on here on how uncompetitive the Pro14 was.


  • Subscribers Posts: 41,831 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    im actually happy they cut the Pro14 short for the rainbow cup

    the pro14 this season was a disgrace. The Irish teams scored more and conceded less than the other 8 teams combined. it simply wasnt a competitive competition.
    at least with the rainbow cup there was still, what, 4 teams which could have reached the NH spot going into the last round... and 2 of the 4 bokke sides topping the SA conference going into their last round.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,808 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    Roll on next season is all I can say, but not before provincial rugby is put in the deep freeze for a couple of months. There's been too much of it and very little variety. It's been too much like Groundhog Day this season (much like life in general). The powers that be have done the best they can, we play in international tournaments and which isn't easy in the midst of a global pandemic. It also hasn't helped that the sport is becoming unwatchable with stoppages even five minutes while the officials run over to a small TV monitor to review if something vaguely illegal has happened or not. Keith Wood made a good point on OTB this morning that next season spectators in the grounds will not tolerate that....expect lots of slow handclaps!

    Hopefully the Lions tour brings a bit of enjoyment and something original to our screens and even the two Ireland matches as well. Then there's the Rugby Championship (what channel will it be on?). So lots to look forward to, but please...no more endless provincial matches against the same teams week after week in competitions made up on the fly, where teams play other teams at random...not until the Autumn anyway.

    Good luck to Benetton in the final though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,056 ✭✭✭Digifriendly


    Absolutely spot on post. My views exactly. Rainbow Cup well intentioned as it may have been has been a bit farcical and I stopped watching matches live a couple of weeks into the competition. Youtube highlights have been sufficient.
    Roll on the Lions.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,361 ✭✭✭✭phog


    The RC was due to have 42 Pool games with teams from 5 countries, 13 games were scheduled between teams from different countries yet only two were cancelled due to Covid. It brought in much needed funds to the club yet the competition seems to be getting a lot of unwarranted flak.


  • Registered Users Posts: 24,767 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    phog wrote: »
    The RC was due to have 42 Pool games with teams from 5 countries, 13 games were scheduled between teams from different countries yet only two were cancelled due to Covid. It brought in much needed funds to the club yet the competition seems to be getting a lot of unwarranted flak.

    It was a makey uppy competition that had its first round the week before European SFs which in itself damaged the tournament as both Leinster and Ulster fielded weakened teams. With so few games most teams were out of it after 1 or 2 rounds because it was clear they weren't going to catch teams that won both of their games. So that meant a lot of dead rubbers. It was dominated by local derbies, something we've all seen more than enough of already this season so was just more of the same for the most part. We were geared up to see SA teams playing against P14 teams. That didn't happen.

    Theres loads of reasons why the tournament was crap from a spectator perspective. I think the tournament was the right idea, but I also think it was completely s**t, pointless and uninteresting. It wasn't there for supporters, but that's okay. We'll all be better off for it next season so that makes it worthwhile.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,153 ✭✭✭PMC83


    phog wrote: »
    The RC was due to have 42 Pool games with teams from 5 countries, 13 games were scheduled between teams from different countries yet only two were cancelled due to Covid. It brought in much needed funds to the club yet the competition seems to be getting a lot of unwarranted flak.


    I've enjoyed it. Yeah I'm a little tired of the interpros but theres been some quality games.


    Mun V Blues
    Mun v Con
    Lein V Glasgow
    Ben V Con


    All very entertaining games that were hard to call.


  • Administrators Posts: 54,091 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    It was just an unwanted extension of an incredibly dull Pro14 IMO.

    I think I watched 1 game. Can't even remember what it was.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,361 ✭✭✭✭phog


    molloyjh wrote: »
    It was a makey uppy competition that had its first round the week before European SFs which in itself damaged the tournament as both Leinster and Ulster fielded weakened teams. With so few games most teams were out of it after 1 or 2 rounds because it was clear they weren't going to catch teams that won both of their games. So that meant a lot of dead rubbers. It was dominated by local derbies, something we've all seen more than enough of already this season so was just more of the same for the most part. We were geared up to see SA teams playing against P14 teams. That didn't happen.

    Theres loads of reasons why the tournament was crap from a spectator perspective. I think the tournament was the right idea, but I also think it was completely s**t, pointless and uninteresting. It wasn't there for supporters, but that's okay. We'll all be better off for it next season so that makes it worthwhile.


    Obviously it was a makey up competition, it was to get the SA into a competition that they couldn't do with the Pro14. The RC was based on the Pro14 so we were always going to have more local derbies again, I think I read the IRFU wanted the InterPros to be kept in the format.

    Was the RC any more crap than what was served up as the Pro14 this year - just look at the final pool tables the 4 Irish provinces miles out ahead of the rest and that after we played each other twice.

    I really don't know what people expected from the RC.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,797 ✭✭✭irelandrover


    I think a lot of people decided at the start it was going to be a terrible tournament.

    However I've enjoyed it. There's been some exciting games that could have went either way. We haven't seen any complete demolitions. Benneton have topped the Northern league, its annoying the way it finished but they were 4 from 4.

    The pro14 itself was a worse league this year with the irish teams dominating.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,153 ✭✭✭PMC83


    awec wrote: »
    It was just an unwanted extension of an incredibly dull Pro14 IMO.

    I think I watched 1 game. Can't even remember what it was.


    If you haven't watched it I'll take your opinions on it with a pinch of salt.



    People bitched and moaned about the PRO14 being long and boring. They cut it short and added in the Saffa teams (a pretty speculative punt) thinking they could spice things up. Teams lost out of playoff spots and the saffa thing fell through due to covid. BUT teams got much needed revenue, and many of those who actually watched it found there were some decent games played at high intensity. But People still not happy.


    A lot of people just don't like the pro14 full stop, but those who do seem to have enjoyed it more of recent. The final will be an interesting watch.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    phog wrote: »
    Obviously it was a makey up competition, it was to get the SA into a competition that they couldn't do with the Pro14. The RC was based on the Pro14 so we were always going to have more local derbies again, I think I read the IRFU wanted the InterPros to be kept in the format.

    Was the RC any more crap than what was served up as the Pro14 this year - just look at the final pool tables the 4 Irish provinces miles out ahead of the rest and that after we played each other twice.

    I really don't know what people expected from the RC.

    The original expectation was for cross hemisphere games. Once that didn't happen, any interest died. It was an ambitious proposal and Covid ruined it.

    Thankfully, we still got the money from SA.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,262 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    bilston wrote: »
    while the officials run over to a small TV monitor to review

    this!

    can't understand why its been done this way. either show it on the large screen in the stadium (im presuming all the stadia used have them) or else just let the tmo make the decision. the jogging back and forth by the refs is a joke


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 243 ✭✭Jerry Attrick


    this!

    can't understand why its been done this way. either show it on the large screen in the stadium (im presuming all the stadia used have them) or else just let the tmo make the decision. the jogging back and forth by the refs is a joke

    Evidently they don't.

    They probably hired by the hosts for home games, but only when there are attendances in the ground.

    Agree that it's nonsensical to see refs jogging maybe 70 metres to stare into a small monitor while trying to block the glare from floodlights or sun. Very amateurish.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,262 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    Evidently they don't.

    They probably hired by the hosts for home games, but only when there are attendances in the ground.

    Agree that it's nonsensical to see refs jogging maybe 70 metres to stare into a small monitor while trying to block the glare from floodlights or sun. Very amateurish.

    this makes a bit more sense so. ill admit ive only been following the munster games and i always presumed the screen was a permanent fixture but on further inspection it seems like its a temporary one. suppose the current situation makes sense so but it seems like a bit of a bodge job all the same


  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 11,853 Mod ✭✭✭✭icdg


    This Gerry Thornley article this morning is worth a read, and unusually he’s not pulling any punches either:

    https://www.irishtimes.com/sport/rugby/pro14/round-of-dead-rubbers-a-fitting-finale-for-rainbow-cup-1.4588929?mode=amp

    For me, the Rainbow Cup was a tournament with some great individual games, especially the first few weeks of Interpros (Leinster v Munster an unfortunate exception). And of course the money the SA teams brought cannot be sniffed at. But the problem was it’s integrity as a sporting competition. The rules of the tournament were changed twice, mid way through the competition, first when it became clear the SA teams wouldn’t be travelling and then when it was decided to hold a final in Treviso after all. No one knew what they were playing for or what would determine qualification for the final. Teams were playing schedules that were most definitely not equal. Now you can lay a large blame for that on the door of Covid, which is fair enough, but you can’t blame the public for not buying in. Even the eir Sport presenters were not selling it well (that may have much to do with the fact that the channel is essentially finished with the final being their very last studio broadcast).

    Compare with Super Rugby Trans-Tasman, a similar five round competition with five teams of ten still in contention going into round 5. Now while there’s a lesson in uneven competition (in terms of NZ v Aus teams), there should never be a case where a round robin competition that short results in a final round consisting solely of dead rubbers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,152 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    this!

    can't understand why its been done this way. either show it on the large screen in the stadium (im presuming all the stadia used have them) or else just let the tmo make the decision. the jogging back and forth by the refs is a joke
    If you dont need the big screen then why have the costs of it open for the day when its not going to be used bar when the Ref/TMO interact....
    this makes a bit more sense so. ill admit ive only been following the munster games and i always presumed the screen was a permanent fixture but on further inspection it seems like its a temporary one. suppose the current situation makes sense so but it seems like a bit of a bodge job all the same
    In most grounds the big screens are temporary so it would be big waste of money to have them when no crowds in
    Dont see how its a "bodge job"...


  • Advertisement
  • Administrators Posts: 54,091 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    The money may have been welcome in the short term but the Pro14 should not underestimate the damage that can be done to an already weak brand by the sort of half-baked nonsense we saw in the RC, and that can cost them in the long run.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,262 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    If you dont need the big screen then why have the costs of it open for the day when its not going to be used bar when the Ref/TMO interact....
    as i pointed out in my response to another poster, i didnt realise they are temporary in general
    In most grounds the big screens are temporary so it would be big waste of money to have them when no crowds in
    Dont see how its a "bodge job"...
    if most grounds wont have screens in place then why not have the tmo be the sole arbiter for such decisions, it makes as much sense as most of the other law changes imo and would save some of the momentum-sapping jogging back and forth by the ref


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,152 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    awec wrote: »
    The money may have been welcome in the short term but the Pro14 should not underestimate the damage that can be done to an already weak brand by the sort of half-baked nonsense we saw in the RC, and that can cost them in the long run.
    How do you think it will or could cost pro14 in long run?
    Changes were needed and with South Africans not having played in some time if you waited until next september for new league they may have lost more players to england/france and wouldnt be as strong.
    The South African sides, with springboks, SA tv money and potential hopefully for Saffers based in London, here to come to some games i dont see how it will cost Pro14 in long run...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,152 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    as i pointed out in my response to another poster, i didnt realise they are temporary in general
    fair enough
    if most grounds wont have screens in place then why not have the tmo be the sole arbiter for such decisions, it makes as much sense as most of the other law changes imo and would save some of the momentum-sapping jogging back and forth by the ref

    Because the ref in the laws is the sole sole judge of fact and of Law and that shouldnt be changed


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    There's going to be a rebrand of the league for next season. If the SA teams turn up and take early scalps, the Rainbow Cup will be forgotten about very quickly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,262 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    fair enough
    Because the ref in the laws is the sole sole judge of fact and of Law and that shouldnt be changed

    up until recently the ref didnt watch replays and while they technically made the final call, when decisions were review it was basically up to the TMO to decide. i wouldnt have seen any problem with a temporary return to this due to current circumstances as it mightve shortened stoppages. maybe it still wouldnt have but the jogging refs are farcical


  • Advertisement
  • Subscribers Posts: 41,831 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    any competition where you are essentially competing against teams that you dont actually play, is a farcical tournament.

    however the RC wasnt the first of this type and wont be the last.
    for what it was, it was acceptable.

    Thornley is fine to criticise it, but offers absolutely no alternative.
    His assertion that the RC was a 'risible joke' due to the Pro14 being cut short... well sorry Gerry but the Pro14 was much more a risible non competition joke than the RC was. It was actually disgraceful how non competitive the welsh, italian and scots were.

    and also about the small screen for the ref being "amateurish".....
    hope you never watch a top level game of soccer then, your head will explode.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    Articles giving out about the RC is the new project player complaint. It's done to death and lazy. We get it.


  • Subscribers Posts: 41,831 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    There's going to be a rebrand of the league for next season. If the SA teams turn up and take early scalps, the Rainbow Cup will be forgotten about very quickly.

    i cant wait to see what a fully loaded bulls / stormers team will do to the likes of the ospreys.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,262 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    sydthebeat wrote: »
    and also about the small screen for the ref being "amateurish".....
    hope you never watch a top level game of soccer then, your head will explode.

    in fairness, countless other and better reasons to not watch soccer


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 243 ✭✭Jerry Attrick


    icdg wrote: »

    This Gerry Thornley article this morning is worth a read, and unusually he’s not pulling any punches either:

    But the problem was it’s integrity as a sporting competition......

    Thornley didn't really write that, did he?

    If so, then my already fading respect for his opinions lurches even further downwards!


    As for the substantive content:
    icdg wrote: »
    The rules of the tournament were changed twice, mid way through the competition, first when it became clear the SA teams wouldn’t be travelling and then when it was decided to hold a final in Treviso after all. No one knew what they were playing for or what would determine qualification for the final.

    I would have though that, reagrdless of the uncertainty, intelligent professional rugby teams would have known that, in general, it's better to try to win games than otherwise. Presumably Gerry thinks otherwise.
    icdg wrote: »

    Compare with Super Rugby Trans-Tasman, a similar five round competition with five teams of ten still in contention going into round 5. Now while there’s a lesson in uneven competition (in terms of NZ v Aus teams), there should never be a case where a round robin competition that short results in a final round consisting solely of dead rubbers.

    It remains to be seen whether or not the final round of the Trans-Tasman tournament will be made up "solely of dead rubbers".


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,361 ✭✭✭✭phog


    awec wrote: »
    The money may have been welcome in the short term but the Pro14 should not underestimate the damage that can be done to an already weak brand by the sort of half-baked nonsense we saw in the RC, and that can cost them in the long run.

    All fine to be moaning but what would you have done to try and get the SA teams involved?

    As I understand it the clubs and Unions bought into this and yes some of it might have been a money grab but equally I'm guessing that they wanted to play rugby in a very trying time for sport.

    Just look at our national sport here at home, they've sat and watched rugby continue through most of the various covid related "lockdowns"

    Like some fans are even saying they're bored of watching the InterPros.


  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 11,853 Mod ✭✭✭✭icdg


    Thornley didn't really write that, did he?
    .

    To be clear, what is below the link are my views, not a summary of what Thornley had written (although he is equally critical for different reasons) and you may blame autocorrect on the its!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,152 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    up until recently the ref didnt watch replays and while they technically made the final call, when decisions were review it was basically up to the TMO to decide. i wouldnt have seen any problem with a temporary return to this due to current circumstances as it mightve shortened stoppages. maybe it still wouldnt have but the jogging refs are farcical
    I think refs should be making the decisions tho.. and dont think returning to that should be the way forward. TMO should be more open to saying exactly what they want
    sydthebeat wrote: »
    any competition where you are essentially competing against teams that you dont actually play, is a farcical tournament.

    however the RC wasnt the first of this type and wont be the last.
    for what it was, it was acceptable.

    Thornley is fine to criticise it, but offers absolutely no alternative.
    His assertion that the RC was a 'risible joke' due to the Pro14 being cut short... well sorry Gerry but the Pro14 was much more a risible non competition joke than the RC was. It was actually disgraceful how non competitive the welsh, italian and scots were.

    and also about the small screen for the ref being "amateurish".....
    hope you never watch a top level game of soccer then, your head will explode.
    agree with lot of that.... but i dont totally agree that any tournament you play without playing all sides is farcical.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 243 ✭✭Jerry Attrick


    sydthebeat wrote: »

    any competition where you are essentially competing against teams that you dont actually play, is a farcical tournament.


    Like the European Champions Cup?


  • Subscribers Posts: 41,831 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Like the European Champions Cup?

    the last bastardisation version, absolutely.

    i dont particularly like the 20 team 5 pool version, though i can see why it exists.
    the fact that only 3 of the 5 pool second placed teams get through is the problem, especially when they had a guaranteed spot for the italians

    the last HC iteration was an abomination

    the sooner they either restrict it to 16 teams of 4 x 4 and straight OFs.... or expend to 24 teams and do 8 x 3s with only top team qualifying, the better.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,140 ✭✭✭✭Caranica


    I know why we had the derbies, but the all the same the lack of seeding made this competition a joke from day 1. Benneton have had one of the easiest runs to a final I've ever heard of.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,361 ✭✭✭✭phog


    Caranica wrote: »
    I know why we had the derbies, but the all the same the lack of seeding made this competition a joke from day 1. Benneton have had one of the easiest runs to a final I've ever heard of.

    If Benetton were beaten by Glasgow and/or Connacht we probably wouldn't be having this discussion.


  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 11,853 Mod ✭✭✭✭icdg




  • Subscribers Posts: 41,831 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    I see young gio aplon is still tipping along for the bulls

    On the bench for this weekend


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,152 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    sydthebeat wrote: »
    the last bastardisation version, absolutely.

    i dont particularly like the 20 team 5 pool version, though i can see why it exists.
    the fact that only 3 of the 5 pool second placed teams get through is the problem, especially when they had a guaranteed spot for the italians

    the last HC iteration was an abomination

    the sooner they either restrict it to 16 teams of 4 x 4 and straight OFs.... or expend to 24 teams and do 8 x 3s with only top team qualifying, the better.

    Going to 16 teams shouldnt happen even if you did more to help make the 2nd tier competition stronger as currently far too many sides treat it as an after thought and 16 teams with 2 qualifiers from each group wouldnt be much good IMO
    24 teams with 8 groups of 3 wouldnt at all be better as would see too many sides losing their first game and then not bothering for rest.


  • Advertisement
  • Subscribers Posts: 41,831 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Going to 16 teams shouldnt happen even if you did more to help make the 2nd tier competition stronger as currently far too many sides treat it as an after thought and 16 teams with 2 qualifiers from each group wouldnt be much good IMO
    24 teams with 8 groups of 3 wouldnt at all be better as would see too many sides losing their first game and then not bothering for rest.

    None of makes for any competition better than a straight 16 or 8*3 comp.

    As it is (20 team 5 pool) once a team loses first two theyre disinterested...the knockouts on effect being that the 5 second place teams are in direct competition with teams they don't meet, and results against other teams they don't meet dictate their fortunes.

    At least with 8 * 3 everyone knows to get out of the group you need to win the group.
    The only teams you are in competition with in the group stages are the teams you play


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,066 ✭✭✭Richie_Rich89


    Another possibility would be 8 groups of 4, with pool winners going through to Cup quarter-finals, 2nd place teams going into plate quarters and 3rd place teams into bowl quarters.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,047 ✭✭✭Bazzo


    Ah you're good craic Richie, I'll give you that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,178 ✭✭✭Brief_Lives


    For those interested, here are the lineups for the Rainbow cup final..

    https://www.pro14.rugby/match-centre/12021/rainbow-cup/benetton-vs-bulls-2021-06-19/367071#tabs-lineups


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,822 ✭✭✭Jump_In_Jack


    Come on Benetton!!


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,267 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Come on Benetton!!

    whoop! They're not looking bad at all


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,499 ✭✭✭Sabre0001


    Some nice play. All treviso so far! Need to slot kicks and throw some cleaner passes though. Looking like it'll be an entertaining game at least.

    🤪



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,822 ✭✭✭Jump_In_Jack


    Few too many handling errors so far but Benetton 8-0 up on 24 minutes


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,267 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Bulls look uninterested


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 486 ✭✭Shaka Hislop


    Podge_irl wrote: »
    Bulls look uninterested

    They're not alone


Advertisement