Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Cricket World Cup Qualifiers

1…262728293032»

Comments

  • #1552
    Joe_ Public
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,023 ✭✭✭✭Joe_ Public


    feargale wrote: »
    I know it's academic now, but surely the following statement in Wiki is incorrect:

    "Tournament hosts Zimbabwe lost their final match in the Super Sixes to the United Arab Emirates, meaning they would need Afghanistan and Ireland's match to end as tie to allow them to progress to the Cricket World Cup."

    Dont fully understand the maths, but there was some scenario involving a low scoring tie in todays match that would have put Zimbabwe through. So it's technically correct at least.


  • #1553
    BarryD2
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4,732 ✭✭✭BarryD2


    Rikand wrote: »
    3 games we lost were all to teams ahead of us in the rankings.

    Not sure if we ever really in that game today after the slowish start, even though they threw us a sort of lifeline. As a punter, not convinced about Porterfield's batting or captaincy decisions.

    We had WI and ZIM both in trouble in the early part of their innings and were unable to press home any advantage.

    Would have been great if both us and Scotland had qualified and they probably deserved it more but fair enough result for our team.


  • #1554
    riffmongous
    Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,812 Mod ✭✭✭✭riffmongous


    How Porterfield has held the captaincy this long is a bit mad, captain for life basically


  • #1555
    minitrue
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 739 ✭✭✭minitrue


    Claregaafan18 wrote: »
    We are witnessing an end of an era regarding our Irish cricket team. Porterfield, O'Brien brothers, Joyce, Murtagh all in their mid 30's. The same players that starred in 2007 WC in the Caribbean when we beat Pakistan are still there today.

    Only Porterfield, the 2 O'Briens and Rankin played against Pakistan and nobody else was in the squad either. Porterfield, Kevin and Rankin were all only 22 then so as easy to argue it was good they were identified and in the side young enough. Niall was 25 and the one now very much nearing the end.


  • #1556
    Claregaafan18
    Closed Accounts Posts: 259 ✭✭Claregaafan18


    minitrue wrote: »
    Only Porterfield, the 2 O'Briens and Rankin played against Pakistan and nobody else was in the squad either. Porterfield, Kevin and Rankin were all only 22 then so as easy to argue it was good they were identified and in the side young enough. Niall was 25 and the one now very much nearing the end.

    Correct. Joyce played for England while Eoin Morgan played for Ireland in 2007. Still though we are an aging team although the lack of conveyor belt meant that we could not try young guns out as they are not out there. Structures in Irish cricket needs massive overhaul or rethink as the status quo is simply not working.

    Finally where was Peter Chase? Was he injured? Or is he just not making much of an inpression for Graham Ford and co?


  • #1557
    feargale
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,636 ✭✭✭feargale


    Claregaafan18 wrote: »
    Correct. Joyce played for England while Eoin Morgan played for Ireland in 2007. Still though we are an aging team although the lack of conveyor belt meant that we could not try young guns out as they are not out there. Structures in Irish cricket needs massive overhaul or rethink as the status quo is simply not working.

    Finally where was Peter Chase? Was he injured? Or is he just not making much of an inpression for Graham Ford and co?

    I wouldn't know alot about cricket, but I get the impression that not much was done to capitalise on the successes of recent years. No new clubs formed, therefore no substantial pool of promising youngsters, therefore same old getting older. I'm sure there are immigrants from India, South Africa etc. around the country crying out for an opportunuity to play cricket but with no club nearby.

    P.S. As an irrelevant aside, congratulations, Claregaafan on spelling aging correctly. I can't remember the last time I saw anything other than ageing in print, by journalists too.


  • #1558
    StringerBell
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,206 ✭✭✭✭StringerBell


    Grassroots cricket has not improved much, not been invested in much maybe I should say, particularly beyond Dublin.

    No complaints about today, I think 240 would have made it interesting but certainly not safe. The teams are not that far apart really and a couple of moments went the other way who knows. The Afghans deserve to win and I wish them luck in the tournament.

    Mention for Phil Simmons, I believe this is the 4th nation he will be taking to the WC? Great achievement.

    "People say ‘go with the flow’ but do you know what goes with the flow? Dead fish."



  • #1559
    BOHtox
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,314 ✭✭✭BOHtox


    It's the end of an era indeed. Test cricket is probably coming too late for us. Joyce is 39, NO'B 36, KO'B 34, Murtagh 36, Porterfield 33, Rankin 33 and all probably past their best. We'd get smashed if we played an actual test match against an Australia or an India. At the same time if we don't get test status we're never going to stop losing the best players that we produce.

    Is it time to start a new cycle? Stirling is 27, Singh 31, Dockrell 25. Wilson 32. They're gonna be around for the next world cup cycle at least maybe we can regroup and have a good go at qualifying next time.


  • #1560
    Drifter50
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 617 ✭✭✭Drifter50


    Now is the time to clean out and bring the younger guys through. We`ve lived too long on wins against Pakistan, England etc
    Peter Chase Tyrone Kane Jack Tector, where are these guys
    Have to move on and I bet we will be destroyed in the test match in May. I`m only going for Thursday, doubt it will last more than 2 /3 days


  • Advertisement
  • #1561
    riffmongous
    Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,812 Mod ✭✭✭✭riffmongous


    Afghanistan on course to hammer the West Indies, 140/1 chasing 204


  • #1562
    Derco
    Registered Users Posts: 194 ✭✭Derco


    Was there any real point in having a final for this tournament?


  • #1563
    First Up
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,823 ✭✭✭✭First Up


    Derco wrote: »
    Was there any real point in having a final for this tournament?
    How else do you suggest they find a winner?


  • #1564
    riffmongous
    Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,812 Mod ✭✭✭✭riffmongous


    Derco wrote: »
    Was there any real point in having a final for this tournament?

    Well at least considering the teams in the tournament it offered the possibility of another precious full member ODI, which worked out brilliantly for the Afghans, two wins over WI this tournament


  • #1565
    Derco
    Registered Users Posts: 194 ✭✭Derco


    First Up wrote: »
    How else do you suggest they find a winner?

    It was a competition for the last two spots in the World Cup. No need for an overall winner. In other World Cups it may decide which group each team goes into but next years one will just have one group of 10.


  • #1566
    feargale
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,636 ✭✭✭feargale


    Derco wrote: »
    It was a competition for the last two spots in the World Cup. No need for an overall winner. In other World Cups it may decide which group each team goes into but next years one will just have one group of 10.

    What's wrong with an auld Junior A cup?


  • Advertisement
  • #1567
    First Up
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,823 ✭✭✭✭First Up


    Derco wrote: »
    First Up wrote: »
    How else do you suggest they find a winner?

    It was a competition for the last two spots in the World Cup. No need for an overall winner. In other World Cups it may decide which group each team goes into but next years one will just have one group of 10.

    It didn't "need" an overall winner but why would you not want to have one?


  • #1568
    Derco
    Registered Users Posts: 194 ✭✭Derco


    First Up wrote: »
    It didn't "need" an overall winner but why would you not want to have one?

    It just seems pointless. A bit like the 3rd place play off at the football World Cup. Afghanistan will be happy with the ranking points but I doubt the Windies gave a toss either way.


  • #1569
    First Up
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,823 ✭✭✭✭First Up


    Derco wrote: »
    First Up wrote: »
    It didn't "need" an overall winner but why would you not want to have one?

    It just seems pointless. A bit like the 3rd place play off at the football World Cup. Afghanistan will be happy with the ranking points but I doubt the Windies gave a toss either way.
    I agree that a 3d place play off is pointless (other than filling TV screens) but if top class competitive sportsmen enter a tournament, they expect to get a chance to win it.


  • #1570
    Derco
    Registered Users Posts: 194 ✭✭Derco


    First Up wrote: »
    I agree that a 3d place play off is pointless (other than filling TV screens) but if top class competitive sportsmen enter a tournament, they expect to get a chance to win it.

    They already did


  • #1571
    First Up
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,823 ✭✭✭✭First Up


    Derco wrote: »
    First Up wrote: »
    I agree that a 3d place play off is pointless (other than filling TV screens) but if top class competitive sportsmen enter a tournament, they expect to get a chance to win it.

    They already did
    Maybe you should look up what "competitive" means.

    If you don't understand what having the chance to beat the West Indies means for Afghan cricketers, I think you need a new hobby.


  • Advertisement
  • #1572
    riffmongous
    Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,812 Mod ✭✭✭✭riffmongous


    If it was just for the full members it might be a bit pointless, but every game is important for the associates*

    *Are we still Associates?


  • #1573
    feargale
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,636 ✭✭✭feargale


    First Up wrote: »
    I agree that a 3d place play off is pointless (other than filling TV screens) but if top class competitive sportsmen enter a tournament, they expect to get a chance to win it.

    Bronze medals pointless then?


  • #1574
    First Up
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,823 ✭✭✭✭First Up


    feargale wrote: »
    First Up wrote: »
    I agree that a 3d place play off is pointless (other than filling TV screens) but if top class competitive sportsmen enter a tournament, they expect to get a chance to win it.

    Bronze medals pointless then?
    The case being made was that there was no need for gold or silver.


  • #1575
    First Up
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,823 ✭✭✭✭First Up


    feargale wrote: »
    First Up wrote: »
    I agree that a 3d place play off is pointless (other than filling TV screens) but if top class competitive sportsmen enter a tournament, they expect to get a chance to win it.

    Bronze medals pointless then?
    The case being made was that there was no need for gold or silver for this tournament.


  • #1576
    TrueDub
    Moderators, Sports Moderators, Regional Abroad Moderators Posts: 2,655 Mod ✭✭✭✭TrueDub


    riffmongous wrote: »
    *Are we still Associates?

    No, both ourselves & Afg are now full members.


  • #1577
    riffmongous
    Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,812 Mod ✭✭✭✭riffmongous


    TrueDub wrote: »
    No, both ourselves & Afg are now full members.

    Going to need a new phrase to describe us now then..


  • #1578
    TrueDub
    Moderators, Sports Moderators, Regional Abroad Moderators Posts: 2,655 Mod ✭✭✭✭TrueDub


    riffmongous wrote: »
    Going to need a new phrase to describe us now then..

    Really? Full members covers it.

    It's ridiculous that the distinction even exists, but it's the reality.


  • #1579
    lambayire
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 924 ✭✭✭lambayire


    We're a full member in name only.

    The odd game here and there.
    Chopping the World Cup to 10 teams is evidence of that.


  • #1580
    BarryD2
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4,732 ✭✭✭BarryD2


    riffmongous wrote: »
    Afghanistan on course to hammer the West Indies, 140/1 chasing 204

    Was glad to see that the Afghans won. They seem to be a team on the up and should give a good account of themselves in the ODI World Cup.

    But on the subject of this tournament in general, I can see no reason why ALL countries should not have to qualify. Could you envisage a batch of teams getting a bye straight though to the FIFA World Cup finals? No, they should all take their chances and qualify.


  • #1581
    ArmaniJeanss
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,512 ✭✭✭✭ArmaniJeanss


    BarryD2 wrote: »
    But on the subject of this tournament in general, I can see no reason why ALL countries should not have to qualify. Could you envisage a batch of teams getting a bye straight though to the FIFA World Cup finals? No, they should all take their chances and qualify.

    In fairness there's lots and lots of such tournaments in various sports where the Top X in the World on a certain date qualify, and the remainder of the places have to be fought for. Or where the Top X finishers from the previous event qualify. The cricket format isn't that unusual.

    Really it's just the numbers of auto qualifiers which is wrong - 8 of 10 is too much and if they had instead limited it to just the Top6 or even Top4 in the World it would have been better as it would also have made every one day series that bit more competitive. And put the rest into the qualifiers along with the associates etc.


  • Advertisement
  • #1582
    endabob1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 911 ✭✭✭endabob1


    ArmaniJeanss wrote: »
    In fairness there's lots and lots of such tournaments in various sports where the Top X in the World on a certain date qualify, and the remainder of the places have to be fought for. Or where the Top X finishers from the previous event qualify. The cricket format isn't that unusual.

    Really it's just the numbers of auto qualifiers which is wrong - 8 of 10 is too much and if they had instead limited it to just the Top6 or even Top4 in the World it would have been better as it would also have made every one day series that bit more competitive. And put the rest into the qualifiers along with the associates etc.

    Rugby operates in a similar way, the top 3 from each of the 2015 pools qualify automatically, ergo Georgia have qualified automatically for 2019 RWC.

    The real issue with cricket is that they reduced the ODI world cup to 10 teams just when they expanded the number of full members to 12
    Rather than growing the game they are looking to consolidate around the biggest countries.

    The argument that there was too many games in the last world cup is a nonsense, the new format is 1 game less in total. With one group of 10 teams and only the top 4 spots for semi finals there will be loads of dead rubbers in it.

    The ICC are using the same format for the 2023 World Cup too which is a huge mistake as it basically rules out the chances of any associates to make it.
    So the impact that Ireland had as an associate in 2007 beating Pakistan, beating England in 2011, West Indies in 2015 will probably never happen again, unless the format is changed.


  • #1583
    Joe_ Public
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,023 ✭✭✭✭Joe_ Public


    Looking from the outside it all seems so horribly elitist and shortsighted. Of course major finals should, by their nature, be elitist, but if growing the game is to be anything more than a token desire, then there has to be a balance struck and allowances made. As a non-rugby fan, I can barely remember the latter stages of the last World Cup while the performances of several of the emerging nations captured my imagination and left a warm lingering glow in the memory.


Advertisement