Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

General Ongoing Doctor Discussion

1111214161723

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,364 ✭✭✭campo


    I'm a bit behind on my viewing and have only just seen the Rosa Parks episode, which I loved. It was the kind of episode I've always wanted from a show that is supposed to travel in time as well as space. Very low key alien shenanigans, loads of history and it didn't feel like previous episodes with a message, like it was banging you over the head with it all the while thinking it was subtle. I also loved how they didn't interfere with Rosa herself. They never told her what she was supposed to do or pushed her towards it. They just made sure the situation presented itself to her. I feel like the last showrunner would have had some great pontificating speech to give and basically make the Doctor responsible for Parks' actions. Chibnall has pitched everything perfectly so far.

    Loving the new gang so far. Not overly keen on Ryan, he seems like the weakest link, acting wise , but I'm loving Whittaker's Doctor, and even Bradley Walsh is doing a great job. I know he's not new to acting but I always associate him with light entertainment TV host kind of cheesy stuff.

    Also, in the 3 episodes I've watched there's been some genuinely funny bits. The "Tim Shaw" moment in the first episode was brilliantly silly but Whittaker is very good at flipping from the silly to the serious. Her face at times during the Rosa Parks episode was a masterclass in expressing things without needing words.

    So yeah, that's my 10p worth, only a few weeks behind :)

    Don't bother with next two, I like Whittaker & Walsh but the storylines have been awful this season.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,249 ✭✭✭✭flazio




  • Registered Users Posts: 6,793 ✭✭✭FunLover18


    David Tennant has a podcast!?!?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,249 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    FunLover18 wrote: »
    David Tennant has a podcast!?!?

    Fairly recently launched, Jodie is his third guest. Olivia Colman was his first and Whoopi Goldberg was his second.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,728 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    FunLover18 wrote: »
    David Tennant has a podcast!?!?

    He will also star in that new Amazon prime TV show 'Bad Omens'

    All eyes on Kursk. Slava Ukraini.



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 17,231 Mod ✭✭✭✭Das Kitty


    He will also star in that new Amazon prime TV show 'Bad Omens'

    Good Omens, but indeed he is the bad one :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,728 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    Das Kitty wrote: »
    Good Omens, but indeed he is the bad one :pac:

    Bahahahaha



    Think I naturally prefer the dark sides.

    All eyes on Kursk. Slava Ukraini.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Looks like the 13th Doc will get her own (VR) game; only a cinematic teaser for now. Do people en masse even play VR games?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,922 ✭✭✭McLoughlin


    Doctor Who and Video Games haven't really been that great. Nice little video on that very subject


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    First season 12 promotion popped up too, must all be timed I guess.

    https://mobile.twitter.com/bbcdoctorwho/status/1130926244801974273


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,793 ✭✭✭FunLover18


    I thought season 12 was delayed


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,254 ✭✭✭Spon Farmer


    Does anyone know when season 11 might be on Netflix?


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Does anyone know when season 11 might be on Netflix?

    No idea myself, Netflix can often lag behind the most recent seasons, so I'd say not until after season 12 airs.

    There's no news on a release date for 12 either, but it's thought that we'll get a trailer on Nov 23rd, so maybe then.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,254 ✭✭✭Spon Farmer


    pixelburp wrote: »
    No idea myself, Netflix can often lag behind the most recent seasons, so I'd say not until after season 12 airs.

    There's no news on a release date for 12 either, but it's thought that we'll get a trailer on Nov 23rd, so maybe then.

    After posting I happened upon the information that season 10 came to Netflix last January which was about a year and a half after it finished on the BBC and Season 9 was two years.

    Poldark releases seem to vary too so I suppose it is just a case of it will show up when it shows up. :p


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,254 ✭✭✭Spon Farmer


    As I’m here I may as well ask this.

    I was very surprised that Capaldi had such a short run. With his enthusiasm is talking about his love for it as a kid and when he was first cast I thought he would be the Doctor for a long, long time.

    When he packed it in I remember him saying something like it feeling like a production line or factory.

    Was it just that he didn’t the process of making a show like that? The hours, etc. Or was there drama going behind the scenes between the producers and the BBC? I was curious about the year it was off the air.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,793 ✭✭✭FunLover18


    As I’m here I may as well ask this.

    I was very surprised that Capaldi had such a short run. With his enthusiasm is talking about his love for it as a kid and when he was first cast I thought he would be the Doctor for a long, long time.

    When he packed it in I remember him saying something like it feeling like a production line or factory.

    Was it just that he didn’t the process of making a show like that? The hours, etc. Or was there drama going behind the scenes between the producers and the BBC? I was curious about the year it was off the air.

    I'm aware of any drama so I'd imagine it was the hectic schedule, he is a man in his 60s after all.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    As I’m here I may as well ask this.

    I was very surprised that Capaldi had such a short run. With his enthusiasm is talking about his love for it as a kid and when he was first cast I thought he would be the Doctor for a long, long time.

    When he packed it in I remember him saying something like it feeling like a production line or factory.

    Was it just that he didn’t the process of making a show like that? The hours, etc. Or was there drama going behind the scenes between the producers and the BBC? I was curious about the year it was off the air.

    As FunLover18 said, I'd say it was just the schedule: Dr. Who is an international show now, and aside from the shooting there's a whole bunch of conventions, junkets and events to attend across the world. Long time since the show was rattled together in a BBC backlot or nearby quarry; in fact I'd say the American market is now as important as its local one.

    AFAIK, only Eccleston ran into actual problems with others on the production team; for a while there was a rumour peddled with some glee that Whitaker had also had a fight with producers, but that showed to be false.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,254 ✭✭✭Spon Farmer


    FunLover18 wrote: »
    I'm aware of any drama so I'd imagine it was the hectic schedule, he is a man in his 60s after all.
    pixelburp wrote: »
    As FunLover18 said, I'd say it was just the schedule: Dr. Who is an international show now, and aside from the shooting there's a whole bunch of conventions, junkets and events to attend across the world. Long time since the show was rattled together in a BBC backlot or nearby quarry; in fact I'd say the American market is now as important as its local one.

    AFAIK, only Eccleston ran into actual problems with others on the production team; for a while there was a rumour peddled with some glee that Whitaker had also had a fight with producers, but that showed to be false.

    Okay. I just remember there being a big break before his final season and I wondered had that gap occurred because of difficulty behind the scenes.

    I didn’t mean difficulty for Capaldi himself - maybe other parties and maybe he just just got fed up of it.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    There has been a gap with Whitaker (and Tenant too) with their seasons, and I think it's just modern logistics, especially the foreign shooting that has become more common. I think last year they shot a lot of it in South Africa? Broadly speaking it's not that uncommon these days for bigger shows to have larger gaps, even Game of Thrones had a 2 year gap I think?. Cost of high production telly I guess.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,254 ✭✭✭Spon Farmer


    pixelburp wrote: »
    There has been a gap with Whitaker (and Tenant too) with their seasons, and I think it's just modern logistics, especially the foreign shooting that has become more common. I think last year they shot a lot of it in South Africa? Broadly speaking it's not that uncommon these days for bigger shows to have larger gaps, even Game of Thrones had a 2 year gap I think?. Cost of high production telly I guess.

    I was years behind when Tennat was he Doctor so I didn’t know about a break there. The Smith and Capaldi years I was watching as they aired.

    I haven’t seen any Whitaker yet. Looking forward to it.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    I was years behind when Tennat was he Doctor so I didn’t know about a break there. The Smith and Capaldi years I was watching as they aired.

    I haven’t seen any Whitaker yet. Looking forward to it.

    Yup; so the Tennant break was a little different: more that they only broadcast specials throughout the year (2009, jaysus) culminating in a Christmas 2 parter that said goodbye to the 10th Doc. So it wasn't technically a break, but it wasn't a normal season of episodes either.

    Of course these hiatuses are always jumped on by clickbait as a "trouble in paradise" story, especially given the relative controversy of Whitaker's Doc.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,254 ✭✭✭Spon Farmer


    pixelburp wrote: »
    Yup; so the Tennant break was a little different: more that they only broadcast specials throughout the year (2009, jaysus) culminating in a Christmas 2 parter that said goodbye to the 10th Doc. So it wasn't technically a break, but it wasn't a normal season of episodes either.

    Of course these hiatuses are always jumped on by clickbait as a "trouble in paradise" story, especially given the relative controversy of Whitaker's Doc.

    What is the controversy about Whitaker?

    How she plays the role or just that she has boobs and vagina?


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    What is the controversy about Whitaker?

    How she plays the role or just that she has boobs and vagina?

    To be fair, there has been fair criticism of Whitaker's Doctor (mostly around the absence of a defining characteristic), but this has been lost behind a wall of noise around her gender. IIRC even here there were some confidently proclaiming the show on hiatus and that Whitaker was out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,254 ✭✭✭Spon Farmer


    pixelburp wrote: »
    To be fair, there has been fair criticism of Whitaker's Doctor (mostly around the absence of a defining characteristic), but this has been lost behind a wall of noise around her gender. IIRC even here there were some confidently proclaiming the show on hiatus and that Whitaker was out.

    Fair criticism in the realm of sci-if and fantasy?

    What Earth am I on? ;)

    What do you mean by a “defining characteristic”?


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Fair criticism in the realm of sci-if and fantasy?

    What Earth am I on? ;)

    What do you mean by a “defining characteristic”?

    The argument has gone that unlike the Tennant, Smith & Capaldi iterations, Whittaker's doesn't really have a singular quirk or personality trait to latch onto; to the point that in some stories, you could (say) swap Whitaker for Smith and the script still worked - whereas you certainly couldn't put Capaldi in a Smith script. This has been a key part of the argument made against the Doctor in Season 11, that Whitaker's Doc doesn't really have a "thing" yet. Don't really think that's entirely Whitaker's fault mind you, though the part does expect the actor to bring some element of their personality to the role.

    In retrospect, I'd say the theory does have merit all right, this Doctor has been a touch derivative & generic - but then I've equally read it suggested that this is the first New-Who Doctor who isn't saddled with survivor's guilt & angst over Gallifrey, automatically making her a lot less dramatic than predecessors.


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 23,931 Mod ✭✭✭✭TICKLE_ME_ELMO


    pixelburp wrote: »
    The argument has gone that unlike the Tennant, Smith & Capaldi iterations, Whittaker's doesn't really have a singular quirk or personality trait to latch onto; to the point that in some stories, you could (say) swap Whitaker for Smith and the script still worked - whereas you certainly couldn't put Capaldi in a Smith script. This has been a key part of the argument made against the Doctor in Season 11, that Whitaker's Doc doesn't really have a "thing" yet. Don't really think that's entirely Whitaker's fault mind you, though the part does expect the actor to bring some element of their personality to the role.

    In retrospect, I'd say the theory does have merit all right, this Doctor has been a touch derivative & generic - but then I've equally read it suggested that this is the first New-Who Doctor who isn't saddled with survivor's guilt & angst over Gallifrey, automatically making her a lot less dramatic than predecessors.

    I would have said Whitaker's Doctor's "quirk" is her positivity. She bears similarity to Smith's Doctor in that respect but for me he always came across more like a goofy kid's entertainer type of vibe and I could never take him seriously when required to, whereas Whitaker seems more like a grown up who knows the worst of things but still has a relentlessly positive attitude.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    I would have said Whitaker's Doctor's "quirk" is her positivity. She bears similarity to Smith's Doctor in that respect but for me he always came across more like a goofy kid's entertainer type of vibe and I could never take him seriously when required to, whereas Whitaker seems more like a grown up who knows the worst of things but still has a relentlessly positive attitude.

    True, I'd say that ties in with her not being saddled with that survivors guilt; as you say she's a more open, happy Doctor with a quite literal new lease of life. I think both arguments are valid, certainly I could see how those watching used to the Doctor being "the Lonely God" that we got with RTD/Moffat, might find this version a little jarring.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,793 ✭✭✭FunLover18


    I thought the writing last season was amongst the worst of NuWho. I didn't like the later Smith series but because I just felt they got too convoluted whereas last series was just boring and forgettable. I really like Whittaker, i just think she's being wasted in poor stories. I've definitely seen the New Year Special but I cannot remember anything about it. I know it contained Daleks but I don't remember that being the case.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,967 ✭✭✭ebbsy


    I don't think one can just blame the writing.


    The thing for me with WHO is the actor being able to elevate average scripts to something good.

    This actress hasn't been able to do that.

    Coming after Capaldi hasn't helped her either. He was one of my favourites.


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 23,931 Mod ✭✭✭✭TICKLE_ME_ELMO


    ebbsy wrote: »
    I don't think one can just blame the writing.


    The thing for me with WHO is the actor being able to elevate average scripts to something good.

    This actress hasn't been able to do that.

    Coming after Capaldi hasn't helped her either. He was one of my favourites.

    Personally I've enjoyed Whittaker and the episodes haven't been terrible, I don't think. I've quite enjoyed there not really being a bigger plot weaving through the episodes and them mostly just being stand alone adventures.

    If there is an issue, for me, it's the multiple companions. I thought it was a good idea at the start but it makes it difficult for the Doctor to form any kind of close relationship with any of them.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,967 ✭✭✭ebbsy


    Personally I've enjoyed Whittaker and the episodes haven't been terrible, I don't think. I've quite enjoyed there not really being a bigger plot weaving through the episodes and them mostly just being stand alone adventures.

    If there is an issue, for me, it's the multiple companions. I thought it was a good idea at the start but it makes it difficult for the Doctor to form any kind of close relationship with any of them.

    Good point about the companions.

    Would never have thought it but Walsh was ok.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,336 ✭✭✭jasonb


    Little bit of casting news for the first episode at least...

    https://www.radiotimes.com/news/tv/2019-11-20/doctor-who-series-12-lenny-henry-stephen-fry/


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    ebbsy wrote: »
    I don't think one can just blame the writing.


    The thing for me with WHO is the actor being able to elevate average scripts to something good.

    This actress hasn't been able to do that.

    Coming after Capaldi hasn't helped her either. He was one of my favourites.

    I don't follow this bit: what do you mean "coming after Capaldi?"


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 23,931 Mod ✭✭✭✭TICKLE_ME_ELMO


    ebbsy wrote: »
    Good point about the companions.

    Would never have thought it but Walsh was ok.

    Yeah, I always forget that Walsh is actually an actor too and not just a presenter. I would get rid of Ryan. I think his and Graham's relationship was supposed to be the important one through that set of episodes but I didn't really care and I'd happily leave Ryan behind.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    It has always been a problem throughout the entire show's history: three companions is just too many to write for & guarantee something for them to do. That combination of Adric, Nyssa & Tegan was just horrendous, especially as Nyssa had an easy arc that was never ploughed (that her father was walking around as The Master)

    I actually like all of 13's friends, but there's no realistic way of including all of them in the adventure; so invariably someone got lost and kicked their heels. More often than not it was Yaz, Ryan & Graham making for a more automatic pairing by dint of their familial connection. I'm not sure who'd I'd cut from the group: maybe Ryan because he got some closure with his biological father.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,249 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    Another side effect is that the writing for the characters is suffering. Take Yasmin for example, she was introduced to us as a probation police officer. Her job is never mentioned again. Not once on any earth stories did she try to assert some authority or even mention she's a police officer. It's just completely ignored.


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 23,931 Mod ✭✭✭✭TICKLE_ME_ELMO


    flazio wrote: »
    Another side effect is that the writing for the characters is suffering. Take Yasmin for example, she was introduced to us as a probation police officer. Her job is never mentioned again. Not once on any earth stories did she try to assert some authority or even mention she's a police officer. It's just completely ignored.

    Agreed. Yasmin is probably the most interesting of the 3 companions but she does seem to have been sidelined a bit in favour of addressing the relationship between Graham and Ryan and their shared grief. Although that did seem to have some resolution last series so maybe Yasmin will get a bit more care and attention this time around.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,967 ✭✭✭ebbsy


    pixelburp wrote: »
    I don't follow this bit: what do you mean "coming after Capaldi?"

    My 3 favourite doctors :

    1 Tom Baker
    2 David Tennant
    3 Peter Capaldi


    And the current doctor is no Capaldi in my view.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    ebbsy wrote: »
    My 3 favourite doctors :

    1 Tom Baker
    2 David Tennant
    3 Peter Capaldi


    And the current doctor is no Capaldi in my view.

    Sorry, I misread what you posted: I thought you were saying that Whitaker was publicly mouthing off about Capaldi, that she was "coming after him" lol :rolleyes: :) Nevermind!


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Agreed. Yasmin is probably the most interesting of the 3 companions but she does seem to have been sidelined a bit in favour of addressing the relationship between Graham and Ryan and their shared grief. Although that did seem to have some resolution last series so maybe Yasmin will get a bit more care and attention this time around.

    I have an inkling that Season 12 might return to arcs & broader plot points: reason being, and I had to google to confirm I heard it, "The Ghost Monument" hinted at something new about the Doc's past we hadn't heard before (I don't think)
    Remnants: Afraid of your own newness. We see deeper, though. Further back. The Timeless Child.
    The Doctor: What did you just say?
    Remnants: She doesn’t know.

    The Doctor: What are you talking about? What can you see?
    Remnants: We see what’s hidden, even from yourself. The outcast, abandoned and unknown.
    The Doctor: Get out of my head!

    AFAIK it didn't come up again, and maybe it was just random babbling to psyche out the Doc during the story, but I've wondered if perhaps it's something we'll come back to - in season 12? Not like the show hasn't been fond of using Ominous Nouns before, to hint at later McGuffins and Arcs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,967 ✭✭✭ebbsy


    pixelburp wrote: »
    Sorry, I misread what you posted: I thought you were saying that Whitaker was publicly mouthing off about Capaldi, that she was "coming after him" lol :rolleyes: :) Nevermind!

    No probs , I did enjoy his run a lot for some reason. Maybe I'm an ould fart.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Chibnall has confirmed he's already working on season 13, debunking the latest set of rumours that he / Whitaker are stepping down.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 333 ✭✭Martin Tyler AgueroooOO


    Will there be a Christmas day episode this year?


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp




  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 14,320 CMod ✭✭✭✭The Master


    Will there be a Christmas day episode this year?

    There wasn't one last year because they'd run out of Christmas ideas :rolleyes:
    https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-christmas-special-scrapped-13520717

    No doubt this years episode will reveal that Santa Claus is really a woman,
    Tying in nicely with the origins retcon that's rumoured for this season


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,249 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    No, no Christmas day special this time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 362 ✭✭nannerby


    Cool Cybermen are back.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    nannerby wrote: »
    Cool Cybermen are back.

    The judoon also spotted; some speculating they also saw the racnoss, which is a deep cut.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Another trailer, and more importantly, a release date: it's back New Years Day :)



  • Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 25,868 Mod ✭✭✭✭Doctor DooM


    I hope the "something's coming for me" line is an indication of some running plot, I know people were tired of Moffat's super complex ones but the last series felt very meandering.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement