Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Youth Assembly on Climate Change

  • 15-11-2019 2:12pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,634 ✭✭✭


    Is it wrong to be cynical about the Youth Assembly on climate change in the Dail?

    No Youth Assembly about the housing crisis, health crisis, political corruption or Irish unification but a Youth Assembly on the climate crisis. Why?

    Do the participants represent the views of young people in Ireland or do they just represent young people who are concerned about climate change?

    Is it appropriate that only young people from one viewpoint were invited to participate in a discussion in the seat of Irish democracy?

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



«134

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,599 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    SafeSurfer wrote: »
    Is it wrong to be cynical about the Youth Assembly on climate change in the Dail?

    No Youth Assembly about the housing crisis, health crisis, political corruption or Irish unification but a Youth Assembly on the climate crisis. Why?

    Do the participants represent the views of young people in Ireland or do they just represent young people who are concerned about climate change?

    Is it appropriate that only young people from one viewpoint were invited to participate in a discussion in the seat of Irish democracy?
    It's important that young people have their say, it will be their country to inherit after all. That said, you'd have to be concerned with the lack of diversity of views.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,479 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    The journal commentors and boards.ie dont believe in climate change or the fact we are destroying the natural world but i dont think its a good representation of irish society and their views in general.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,634 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    The journal commentors and boards.ie dont believe in climate change or the fact we are destroying the natural world but i dont think its a good representation of irish society and their views in general.

    Do you think that the youth assembly of 100% of young people concerned about climate change is reflective of the views of young people as a whole. Is there no room for even one or two dissenting voices out of 157 delegates?

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,599 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    The journal commentors and boards.ie dont believe in climate change or the fact we are destroying the natural world but i dont think its a good representation of irish society and their views in general.

    I don't think that's accurate. There are strong views on both sides of the debate and they get aired regularly here.

    On the basis of the amount of littering that goes on outside my local school, they're are more than a few young people that couldn't give two hoots about the environment. I somehow suspect that that cavalier attitude won't get an airing in the chamber today.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,268 ✭✭✭✭uck51js9zml2yt


    Kow towing to kids. What next?


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,813 Mod ✭✭✭✭riffmongous


    Kow towing to kids. What next?

    In what way are they kow towing to kids?


  • Registered Users Posts: 946 ✭✭✭KSU


    Smart

    Let those not paying taxes reaffirm the Governments proposals to implement more and fresh "carbon" taxes.

    I have a feeling it might be the first public body they listen to wholeheartedly :p


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,634 ✭✭✭✭Graces7


    In what way are they kow towing to kids?

    I think maybe he is being … humourous!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,996 ✭✭✭✭gozunda


    KSU wrote: »
    Smart

    Let those not paying taxes reaffirm the Governments proposals to implement more and fresh "carbon" taxes.

    I have a feeling it might be the first public body they listen to wholeheartedly :p

    Better idea. Let's tax the kids so they get to pay their fair share of carbon emissions. That should raise the heat of the topic at the assembly - plus the government gets to widen the tax base. Win win ....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,679 ✭✭✭Field east


    I don't think that's accurate. There are strong views on both sides of the debate and they get aired regularly here.

    On the basis of the amount of littering that goes on outside my local school, they're are more than a few young people that couldn't give two hoots about the environment. I somehow suspect that that cavalier attitude won't get an airing in the chamber today.

    Having listened to a number. Of the attendance being interviewed the general gist of these interviews was how excited they are to be in the hallowed grounds of the dail, etc, etc, in that vein. Climate change issues kind of took a back seat. So did their ‘teachers ‘ forget to ‘school’ them not to lose the run of themselves


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,813 Mod ✭✭✭✭riffmongous


    KSU wrote: »
    Smart

    Let those not paying taxes reaffirm the Governments proposals to implement more and fresh "carbon" taxes.

    I have a feeling it might be the first public body they listen to wholeheartedly :p
    gozunda wrote: »
    Better idea. Let's tax the kids so they get to pay their fair share of carbon emissions. That should raise the heat of the topic at the assembly - plus the government gets to widen the tax base. Win win ....

    The kids will probably end paying more of any new taxes than either of ye over their lifetime.. no harm in them having a chance to discuss it


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,634 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    gozunda wrote: »
    Better idea. Let's tax the kids so they get to pay their fair share of carbon emissions. That should raise the heat of the topic at the assembly - plus the government gets to widen the tax base. Win win ....


    I’ve heard of “No taxation without representation” but never “No representation without taxation”.

    Would it be acceptable to have a youth assembly on Irish reunification to which only those in favour of Irish reunification were invited? No, it would be seen as unrepresentative, discriminatory and undemocratic. But if the subject is climate change those principles don’t apply.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,033 ✭✭✭✭Richard Hillman


    Absolute nonsense. RTE are just auditioning for their star of Climate Change, who will of course have great time for RTE for giving them the platform to launch a career in Green Socialism.

    I imagine it's everyone around the chamber agreeing with each other, whilst trying to out-do one another in the hysteria stakes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,634 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    The kids will probably end paying more of any new taxes than either of ye over their lifetime.. no harm in them having a chance to discuss it

    The “discussion” involves one opinion.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,187 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    SafeSurfer wrote: »
    Is it wrong to be cynical about the Youth Assembly on climate change in the Dail?

    No Youth Assembly about the housing crisis, health crisis, political corruption or Irish unification but a Youth Assembly on the climate crisis. Why?


    Do the participants represent the views of young people in Ireland or do they just represent young people who are concerned about climate change?

    Is it appropriate that only young people from one viewpoint were invited to participate in a discussion in the seat of Irish democracy?

    The idea for the Youth Assembly mainly came about because of Greta Thunberg and the school strike protests (which have only been taking place for 12 months or so).

    Without Greta, this Youth Assembly wouldn't even be happening today.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,907 ✭✭✭Stevieluvsye


    Ah FFS not one of these again, every different forum it's climate change this and climate change that


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,028 ✭✭✭✭SEPT 23 1989


    If the end of the world is truly nigh they should spend the rest of their short lives enjoying themselves


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,433 ✭✭✭AlanG


    This is no harm as long as the kids were randomly selected and are not just mates of TD's.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,634 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    Strazdas wrote: »
    The idea for the Youth Assembly mainly came about because of Greta Thunberg and the school strike protests (which have only been taking place for 12 months or so).

    Without Greta, this Youth Assembly wouldn't even be happening today.

    Do you think a Youth Assembly would be allowed to take place to highlight other issues that effect young people such as participation in a European Army, a United Ireland etc? Is it only because the participants are broadly in line with Government policy that the discussion is allowed to take place? Any issues where a diversity of opinion existed, such as the issues above, would never be entertained in a Youth Assembly.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,634 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    Ah FFS not one of these again, every different forum it's climate change this and climate change that

    Have you watched TV or read a newspaper lately. The climate crisis is everywhere. Is it really surprising that it is being discussed here?

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,766 ✭✭✭farna_boy


    SafeSurfer wrote: »
    Is it wrong to be cynical about the Youth Assembly on climate change in the Dail?

    No Youth Assembly about the housing crisis, health crisis, political corruption or Irish unification but a Youth Assembly on the climate crisis. Why?

    Do the participants represent the views of young people in Ireland or do they just represent young people who are concerned about climate change?

    Is it appropriate that only young people from one viewpoint were invited to participate in a discussion in the seat of Irish democracy?

    None of the crises you raise have the potential to have the same impact on every young person as climate change has.

    If the problems relating to climate change aren't addressed, all of the above will be minor inconveniences at best by the time the youth are grown up.

    With regards differeing view points, would you also support anti-vaxxers on health boards, flat-earthers on scientific boards or racists/xenophobes on immigration boards?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,996 ✭✭✭✭gozunda


    The kids will probably end paying more of any new taxes than either of ye over their lifetime.. no harm in them having a chance to discuss it

    Well it was a tongue in cheek comment. But no matter - I somehow doubt that tbh. Tax regimes in this country have been punitive for those working as long as I have been around. Though the numbers of those exempted from paying tax and paying low amounts of tax have been growing oddly enough. It's just a smaller number squeezed for ever more government revenue. If the kids really want to make a positive impact - the idea of paying their share - would certainly sharpen their awareness of been driven to school, disposable fashion etc. Whilst obviousley impracticable - the idea just might make them think a bit deeper than finger pointing, blaming the adults and screaming 'how dare you'...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,187 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    AlanG wrote: »
    This is no harm as long as the kids were randomly selected and are not just mates of TD's.

    I believe around 1000 students applied after it was advertised and it was whittled down to 157 in the end.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,634 ✭✭✭✭Graces7


    gozunda wrote: »
    Well it was a tongue in cheek comment. But no matter - I somehow doubt that tbh. Tax regimes in this country have been punitive for those working as long as I have been around. Though the numbers of those exempted from paying tax and paying low amounts of tax have been growing oddly enough. It's just a smaller number squeezed for ever more government revenue. If the kids really want to make a positive impact - the idea of paying their share - would certainly sharpen their awareness of been driven to school, disposable fashion etc. Whilst obviousley impracticable - the idea just might make them think a bit deeper than finger pointing, blaming the adults and screaming 'how dare you'...


    :eek: :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,448 ✭✭✭✭nullzero
    °°°°°


    SafeSurfer wrote: »
    Do you think that the youth assembly of 100% of young people concerned about climate change is reflective of the views of young people as a whole. Is there no room for even one or two dissenting voices out of 157 delegates?

    Welcome to the modern world, dissenting voices aren't allowed, but it's all OK, don't worry about it.

    Glazers Out!



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,813 Mod ✭✭✭✭riffmongous


    gozunda wrote: »
    Well it was a tongue in cheek comment. But no matter - I somehow doubt that tbh. Tax regimes in this country have been punitive for those working as long as I have been around. Though the numbers of those exempted from paying tax and paying low amounts of tax have been growing oddly enough. It's just a smaller number squeezed for ever more government revenue. If the kids really want to make a positive impact - the idea of paying their share - would certainly sharpen their awareness of been driven to school, disposable fashion etc. Whilst obviousley impracticable - the idea just might make them think a bit deeper than finger pointing, blaming the adults and screaming 'how dare you'...

    What I meant was that you'll be in pension soon enough (relatively speaking) where as they will be paying any new tax for the entirety of their working life. And I'd think most of the ones driven enough to take part in something like this will not end up in the lower tax exemption bands.

    I'd also think then and at the very least hope that the ones there today will also be a bit brighter than the 'how dare you' crowd, considering you had to go to the effort to apply to be there today, I'd say it as a fair assumption. Let's see what they come up with anyway before writing them off


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,634 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    farna_boy wrote: »
    None of the crises you raise have the potential to have the same impact on every young person as climate change has.

    If the problems relating to climate change aren't addressed, all of the above will be minor inconveniences at best by the time the youth are grown up.

    With regards differeing view points, would you also support anti-vaxxers on health boards, flat-earthers on scientific boards or racists/xenophobes on immigration boards?

    I would argue that the potential to be called on to fight in a future war would have a greater impact on these young people’s lives than the effects of climate change. I would also argue that Ireland’s ability to impact global climate change is so insignificant that even if all the policies they propose were adopted immediately, their impact on climate change would be negligible.

    We cannot have a discussion where only one view point is articulated. People of varying opinion are elected as public representatives precisely because they reflect a diversity of opinion.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,907 ✭✭✭Stevieluvsye


    SafeSurfer wrote: »
    Have you watched TV or read a newspaper lately. The climate crisis is everywhere. Is it really surprising that it is being discussed here?

    After Hours, Weather, at least three in IMHO and IMHO it isn't a topic for after hours

    PS
    It's all bull**** anyway


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,187 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    SafeSurfer wrote: »
    I’ve heard of “No taxation without representation” but never “No representation without taxation”.

    Would it be acceptable to have a youth assembly on Irish reunification to which only those in favour of Irish reunification were invited? No, it would be seen as unrepresentative, discriminatory and undemocratic. But if the subject is climate change those principles don’t apply.

    I doubt you would find many climate change deniers among children and teenagers, if any (such people are usually much older and right wing conservatives etc).


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,634 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    Strazdas wrote: »
    I doubt you would find many climate change deniers among children and teenagers, if any (such people are usually much older and right wing conservatives etc).

    So the minority should be excluded from a discussion in the seat of Irish democracy. I see.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,942 ✭✭✭topper75


    Strazdas wrote: »
    I believe around 1000 students applied after it was advertised and it was whittled down to 157 in the end.

    I'm surprised there wasn't a Saturday night Cowell-style premium number to vote on. Missed a few €€€ there lads - ye are losing the edge.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,690 ✭✭✭✭Skylinehead


    gozunda wrote: »
    Better idea. Let's tax the kids so they get to pay their fair share of carbon emissions.
    Anything they buy is taxed (VAT).

    What else do you propose taxing? Their income? Lets say 50%. Of 0, which is...0.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,187 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    SafeSurfer wrote: »
    So the minority should be excluded from a discussion in the seat of Irish democracy. I see.

    I think one or two dissenting voices telling the rest of the delegates they are wrong about just about everything would be disruptive and would achieve nothing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,599 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    Strazdas wrote: »
    I think one or two dissenting voices telling the rest of the delegates they are wrong about just about everything would be disruptive and would achieve nothing.

    What's the point of there can be no dissent?

    Aside from promoting government policy and a photo-op of course?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,187 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    What's the point of there can be no dissent?

    Aside from promoting government policy and a photo-op of course?

    The Assembly is an ideas forum where delegates suggest solutions to climate change. Someone going in and telling everyone that climate change is a hoax and doesn't exist would be a bit bonkers in such a setting.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,634 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    Strazdas wrote: »
    I think one or two dissenting voices telling the rest of the delegates they are wrong about just about everything would be disruptive and would achieve nothing.


    The North Korean Communist Party think the same.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,599 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    Anything they buy is taxed (VAT).

    What else do you propose taxing? Their income? Lets say 50%. Of 0, which is...0.

    Presumably he means tax the parents for expenditure on children.

    Presumably this would mean carbon levies on things aimed at or facilitating children: such as clothes, school books, childcare, toys and gadgets, junk food, holidays etc.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,561 ✭✭✭Micky 32


    SafeSurfer wrote: »
    Have you watched TV or read a newspaper lately. The climate crisis is everywhere. Is it really surprising that it is being discussed here?

    Is it? I was in the USA last week and not one person mentioned or did i hear anyone crying about it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,809 ✭✭✭Hector Savage


    Same kids that are driven into school every day in parents SUV.
    That are always on their phones/tablets/laptops - I guess those batteries just mine and charge themselves.

    Wonder when they are off on their next family holiday too ?
    The hypocrisy of the movement is incredible really.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,690 ✭✭✭✭Skylinehead


    Presumably he means tax the parents for expenditure on children.

    Presumably this would mean carbon levies on things aimed at or facilitating children: such as clothes, school books, childcare, toys and gadgets, junk food, holidays etc.

    If he means tax the parents, he should say so. He didn't.

    Utterly stupid idea anyway, it's not the kids that caused any of this.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 946 ✭✭✭KSU


    The kids will probably end paying more of any new taxes than either of ye over their lifetime.. no harm in them having a chance to discuss it

    The problem with it is that kids are looking at it from a myopic view, look at GT having a pop in interviews with anyone who makes any sort of debate based on economics.

    Without a fuller view of the implications kids are being coaxed into supporting further taxation without a broader sense of the implications.

    People for the most part aim to protect the elderly from making bad decisions due to dimished capacity yet somehow anyone doing so with regards to youth is silenced due to the orchestrated vilification of those with legitimate concerns with the direction modern society is taking.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,634 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    Strazdas wrote: »
    The Assembly is an ideas forum where delegates suggest solutions to climate change. Someone going in and telling everyone that climate change is a hoax and doesn't exist would be a bit bonkers in such a setting.

    No. The assembly is part of the 100th year anniversary commemoration of the first Dail. It is dubbed as an opportunity for young people to express their opinions and have their voices heard.
    The selection process is designed to represent people from different genders, backgrounds and parts of the country. Diversity in everything but opinion.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,447 ✭✭✭Calhoun


    SafeSurfer wrote: »
    Is it wrong to be cynical about the Youth Assembly on climate change in the Dail?

    No Youth Assembly about the housing crisis, health crisis, political corruption or Irish unification but a Youth Assembly on the climate crisis. Why?

    Do the participants represent the views of young people in Ireland or do they just represent young people who are concerned about climate change?

    Is it appropriate that only young people from one viewpoint were invited to participate in a discussion in the seat of Irish democracy?

    I don't think it's wrong to be cynical as we have seen in politics that adults are not above using children because how could you attack a point a child has made.

    They have a right to have their say but people also have a right to be critical of their solutions /opinions. There is an air of self righteousness about them though that won't win allot of folk over. Although it could just be RTE inflating trying to be relevant.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,455 ✭✭✭✭ednwireland


    Micky 32 wrote: »
    Is it? I was in the USA last week and not one person mentioned or did i hear anyone crying about it.

    you flew to the states ? how dare you !


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,942 ✭✭✭topper75


    Same kids that are driven into school every day in parents SUV.
    That are always on their phones/tablets/laptops - I guess those batteries just mine and charge themselves.

    Wonder when they are off on their next family holiday too ?
    The hypocrisy of the movement is incredible really.

    This country has seen all this before. Some of the shower who were lecturing us about sex outside of marriage fathered kids on the sly. Politicians lecturing about us living beyond our means and themselves buying Charvet shirts in Paris.

    It comes in different guises through the years, but is a key part of the character of the Irish nation. All you can do is laugh.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,599 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    Strazdas wrote: »
    The Assembly is an ideas forum where delegates suggest solutions to climate change. Someone going in and telling everyone that climate change is a hoax and doesn't exist would be a bit bonkers in such a setting.

    So there's no room for the young people who think that the environmentally destructive behavior that they themselves engage in is ok.

    It's very easy to say that carbon taxes on fuel should increase, but there seems to be little understanding of the consequences of such policies (particularly among the young people whose views are presented in the media). The need to understand that the future they're fighting for will inevitably lead to a lower standard of living in Ireland. If they understand that and the consequences of that well that's their future inheritance. And that's fine.

    But it appears to me that there isn't even a skin deep understanding among many young people about this aspect.


  • Posts: 2,799 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    It's nonsense. A political move. A bunch of kids repeating what was trending on twitter yesterday


  • Moderators, Music Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 25,734 Mod ✭✭✭✭Boom_Bap


    It's taking kids to show how idiotic adults have been.


  • Registered Users Posts: 946 ✭✭✭KSU


    It's nonsense. A political move. A bunch of kids repeating what was trending on twitter yesterday

    Twitter for iPhone, powered by fossil fuels, paid for by mommy and daddy :cool:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,690 ✭✭✭✭Skylinehead


    Moved to CA btw.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement