Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Aer Lingus Fleet/Routes Discussion

1163164166168169195

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,367 ✭✭✭micosoft


    A review of the new A321 AL Europe business class product which is the same as the TAL product with the notable exception that catering is the basic Europe "Ham and cheese toasties" catering (but free).

    Seems a bizarre product tbh - I get the "stay in same class" but for the last 60-90 min? Lie flat beds yet down market catering? Perhaps it's fleet flexibility or cross over but will be interesting getting a lie flat for Dublin to London!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,929 ✭✭✭Van.Bosch


    Any suggestions for what seats to choose for a super nervous flyer on the DUB - MIA route? Looking forward to the trip, travelling via Miami to Costa Rica with aerlingus and AA but am deathly afraid of flying, long haul will be the test of endurance :)

    I’d go with a window, everything is calm when you look out. It’s a pity you can’t sit in the cockpit, was on a tiny plane years ago and there was no door to cockpit. The plane was bouncing around everywhere, you could see in to the pilots, calm as anything, normal for them, was very reassuring to a nervous passenger nearby.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,251 ✭✭✭kevinandrew


    micosoft wrote: »
    A review of the new A321 AL Europe business class product which is the same as the TAL product with the notable exception that catering is the basic Europe "Ham and cheese toasties" catering (but free).

    Seems a bizarre product tbh - I get the "stay in same class" but for the last 60-90 min? Lie flat beds yet down market catering? Perhaps it's fleet flexibility or cross over but will be interesting getting a lie flat for Dublin to London!

    It's not business class.

    Aer Space is marketed and sold as a 'premium short haul' product, the airline is very careful not to use the phrase 'business class' anywhere when describing it.

    https://www.aerlingus.com/travel-information/aer-lingus-news/aerspace/

    Note how the lie flat seat is never mentioned, this is because should be considered the exception, not the rule, when it comes to this product. It's merely an added bonus for most.

    The A321LR on select European routes is mostly about utilisation of the aircraft rather than the desire to provide full flat bed business product on short haul.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,367 ✭✭✭micosoft


    It's not business class.

    etc...

    I'm unclear what you are suggesting? Why do you assume Aer Lingus will sell this as Aer Space and not attempt to monetize a full business cabin (albeit with non-business catering). Do you not think they will attempt to sell J class tickets if they can?

    Edit. Best explanation here: https://onemileatatime.com/aer-lingus-intra-europe-business-class/


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 9,933 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    ........ I'm not a fan of the overnight flight, the A row has better leg room in bed mode.

    They do need to renumber the A seats for consistency across the fleet, it's quite annoying when a -200 shows up.

    I thought all the seats were the same, apart from some having the little stowage closet?

    Is there a marked difference in the A seats between the 200 versus 300?


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,185 Mod ✭✭✭✭Locker10a


    micosoft wrote: »
    I'm unclear what you are suggesting? Why do you assume Aer Lingus will sell this as Aer Space and not attempt to monetize a full business cabin (albeit with non-business catering). Do you not think they will attempt to sell J class tickets if they can?

    Edit. Best explanation here: https://onemileatatime.com/aer-lingus-intra-europe-business-class/

    Isn’t it the exact same as what they’ve done for years when the a330s were used on Malaga and Faro etc, it’s essentially a seat upgrade, nothing more, only now with Aer Space you’ve pre-paid for something from the buy on board.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,206 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    Tenger wrote: »
    I thought all the seats were the same, apart from some having the little stowage closet?

    Is there a marked difference in the A seats between the 200 versus 300?

    The A seats either have table on the window side or aisle side, the position alternates depending on -200 or -300

    Rows 2/4/6 HK are to be avoided, these are the smallest space seats


  • Registered Users Posts: 377 ✭✭alancostello


    The A seats either have table on the window side or aisle side, the position alternates depending on -200 or -300

    Rows 2/4/6 HK are to be avoided, these are the smallest space seats

    To be avoided for a solo traveller. If you’re travelling as a couple some would prefer to be together and still have a window.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,551 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    sherology wrote: »

    I'm pretty certain this is a really badly written article and just covering the two we knew about (one of which is 'delivered' already, as the article even mentions) rather than two further. I don't think there are any unidentified 330ceos in the production order and we're nearly at the end of that.


  • Registered Users Posts: 409 ✭✭sherology


    L1011 wrote: »
    I'm pretty certain this is a really badly written article and just covering the two we knew about (one of which is 'delivered' already, as the article even mentions) rather than two further. I don't think there are any unidentified 330ceos in the production order and we're nearly at the end of that.

    It is somewhat confusing to read... The total numbers EI has are 9, 10, and 11 throughout so not sure how correct it is. It has been up since before noon, so nobody has corrected them thus far.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 409 ✭✭sherology


    sherology wrote: »
    It is somewhat confusing to read... The total numbers EI has are 9, 10, and 11 throughout so not sure how correct it is. It has been up since before noon, so nobody has corrected them thus far.

    Yeah... It's been reprinted and better edited on simplyflying... So the 2 newbies (recent delivered) are the two referred to on flightglobal.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,251 ✭✭✭kevinandrew


    I also think this article is confusing EI-EIM and ‘EIN with additional orders.

    As of December 2019, Aer Lingus has the following wide body fleet;

    A330-200 - 5

    EI-LAX
    E-EWR
    EI-DAA
    EI-DUO
    EI-GEY

    A330-300 - 9

    EI-DUZ
    EI-EAV
    EI-EDY
    EI-ELA
    EI-FNG
    EI-FNH
    EI-GAJ
    EI-GCF
    EI-EIM

    On order - 1

    A330-300

    EI-EIN

    Total: 15 (10 + 5)

    The article mistakenly suggests the delivery of EI-EIM has brought to the total of A330-300s to 10 when it has in fact brought it to 9, it will be EIN’ that brings them to 10 in total plus the 5 A330-200s already in the fleet.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,410 ✭✭✭✭salmocab


    A bit glib and I’m a bit of a lurker here but will we be seeing EI-EIO. I really want to see that and I know it’s childish but I love a cheap giggle.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 9,933 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    salmocab wrote: »
    A bit glib and I’m a bit of a lurker here but will we be seeing EI-EIO. I really want to see that and I know it’s childish but I love a cheap giggle.

    Nope.
    EI-EIO is already taken, has been for years now. A light aircraft in the south or Southwest.

    EIM and EIN are the last 2 passenger ceo's on the Airbus production list. Have been marked for EI for at least 2 months now. So that Flight global article is sloppily written.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,818 ✭✭✭donvito99


    Amazing to think that not too long ago EI only had x3 332s and x4 333s


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,478 ✭✭✭✭cson


    Some of this is IAG using DUB as an LHR capacity release valve I would imagine.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 9,933 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    I must be quite old as I clearly remember when they only had 5 A333s.......I was onboard LAX when it was 3 weeks old!!!

    cson wrote: »
    Some of this is IAG using DUB as an LHR capacity release valve I would imagine.
    I doubt it to be honest. The shift to using DUB as a hub for onward travel had happened before the IAG takeover. But pricing themselves under the other competitors (BA included) they are taking traffic from AA,UA,DL,VS,AC,AF,KL and BA.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,410 ✭✭✭✭salmocab


    Tenger wrote: »
    Nope.
    EI-EIO is already taken, has been for years now. A light aircraft in the south or Southwest.

    Cheers, I’m disappointed I assumed it was going in some sort of alphabetical order.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,144 ✭✭✭peter1892


    Tenger wrote: »
    Nope.
    EI-EIO is already taken, has been for years now. A light aircraft in the south or Southwest.

    It used to be on a Piper Seneca that was based out of Weston, but the a/c in question suffered a landing gear failure and I don't think it was ever put back into service.

    The reg may have been reallocated.

    I did hear a story once of a pilot having to repeat the reg to ATC, along the lines of 'Echo India Echo India October as in old McDonald!', but that could just be the kind of urban legend that grows around a smoky coffee room in Weston ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,560 ✭✭✭Noxegon


    Tenger wrote: »
    I must be quite old as I clearly remember when they only had 5 A333s.......I was onboard LAX when it was 3 weeks old!!!

    I can actually outdo that one; I was a passenger on one of the first A330 transatlantic flights in May 1994. I wonder if my parents still have the boarding pass...

    I develop Superior Solitaire when I'm not procrastinating on boards.ie.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,814 ✭✭✭Captain_Crash


    Noxegon wrote: »
    I can actually outdo that one; I was a passenger on one of the first A330 transatlantic flights in May 1994. I wonder if my parents still have the boarding pass...


    Can't outdo that, but can nearly match it, my first EI A330 flight was June 1994.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,206 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    EI was the first TATL operator with the A330 and will get the last A330 ceo

    And all because Bernie Cahill cut a deal with Airbus on the side that no one knew about and 3 A330's appeared in Dublin within a few months back in 1994.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 893 ✭✭✭HTCOne


    EI was the first TATL operator with the A330 and will get the last A330 ceo

    And all because Bernie Cahill cut a deal with Airbus on the side that no one knew about and 3 A330's appeared in Dublin within a few months back in 1994.

    And the story goes he got the first 2 for free in exchange for doing all the ETOPS proving work. #4 (EI-JFK) was an opportunistic acquisition after Air Inter folded IIRC, hence the Tourism Ireland livery and no IFE whatsoever.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,519 ✭✭✭ozzy jr


    I flew on the A330 in May 1994, but from Manchester to Dublin. I presume this would have been one of the very first Aer Lingus flights to get crew used to it etc.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,206 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    HTCOne wrote: »
    And the story goes he got the first 2 for free in exchange for doing all the ETOPS proving work. #4 (EI-JFK) was an opportunistic acquisition after Air Inter folded IIRC, hence the Tourism Ireland livery and no IFE whatsoever.

    Airbus had a pile of white tails and needed to generate sales, ETOPS gave them TATL options from most EU capitals to East Coast US.

    At the time the 777 hadn't flown yet and the A330-300 was the largest twin jet in the world.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 9,933 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    The first 2 weren't free, but the large amount of spare parts that Airbus sent with them were. The ETOPS proving of the aircraft was in return for a hefty discount on the first orders.

    Airbus had a lot riding on the aircraft so wanted EI to have no technical issues at all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,929 ✭✭✭Van.Bosch


    Tenger wrote: »
    The first 2 weren't free, but the large amount of spare parts that Airbus sent with them were. The ETOPS proving of the aircraft was in return for a hefty discount on the first orders.

    Airbus had a lot riding on the aircraft so wanted EI to have no technical issues at all.

    I assume the plan was always to get it ETOPs certified or did it have a market without it and this was a bonus?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,551 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    They needed ETOPS to get beyond a replication of the old A300 market which would not have been enough


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 893 ✭✭✭HTCOne


    The 767 already had ETOPS 180, which required no more than 1 engine shut down per 50,000 hours of operations. Naturally this took quite a bit of time to accrue in order to prove the reliability and obtain the certification. ETOPS 120 requires 1 shut down in 20,000 hours. Somebody needed to accrue these hours in commercial ops for the A330 to gain certification, and EI did the lions share in exchange for favourable treatment from Airbus. Then the FAA granted ETOPS 180 to the 777 out of the box, which really pi$$ed a lot of other agencies off. The JAA restricted the 777 to ETOPS 120 until the 180 criteria was met in commercial ops.

    The A350 can obtain ETOPS 370. I believe there's no reason to push ETOPS any further, as this covers every route pairing currently in existence, ie NZ/OZ to South America and South Africa. I’ll leave it to the pilots here to express how happy they’d be on one engine in a heavy twin over 6 hours from the nearest runway after a failure.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 409 ✭✭sherology


    Tenger wrote: »
    I must be quite old as I clearly remember when they only had 5 A333s.......I was onboard LAX when it was 3 weeks old!!!


    I doubt it to be honest. The shift to using DUB as a hub for onward travel had happened before the IAG takeover. But pricing themselves under the other competitors (BA included) they are taking traffic from AA,UA,DL,VS,AC,AF,KL and BA.

    Undercutting them, and providing better than equal service in my opinion. I can't fault EI across the pond (economy) in terms of seating, food, entertainment, aircraft, crew etc. Keep it up 'team'... You're an example of how to do things well 'and' profitably... From an opportinitic passenger of cheap saver seats. LPA again Saturday... Bike-time/Sun-time :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 351 ✭✭Shamrockj




  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,185 Mod ✭✭✭✭Locker10a


    Sorry if this was discussed already, but I couldn’t see it on the booking engine yet, has the 321neolr been confirmed for any Euro routes other than LHR for next summer?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,756 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    Locker10a wrote: »
    Sorry if this was discussed already, but I couldn’t see it on the booking engine yet, has the 321neolr been confirmed for any Euro routes other than LHR for next summer?

    Nothing yet and with 2 assigned to LHR there probably won't be anymore operating in 2020 unless they get a fifth one.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 9,933 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    I thought the remaking 5 would be delivered before the end of summer next year?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,206 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    -LRD was unpainted and missing her engines in late Nov so is probably due February

    No sign of E/F/G/H


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 409 ✭✭sherology


    Flightglobal seems to have gone to the dogs regarding accuracy/editing... https://www.flightglobal.com/airlines/united-links-san-francisco-and-dublin-from-june-2020/135847.article

    EI serve this route daily right?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,551 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    sherology wrote: »
    Flightglobal seems to have gone to the dogs regarding accuracy/editing... https://www.flightglobal.com/airlines/united-links-san-francisco-and-dublin-from-june-2020/135847.article

    EI serve this route daily right?

    Daily and potentially going to 10w at that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,469 ✭✭✭WishUWereHere


    There were direct flights last summer for about 3 months. Anyone any idea how successful the route was & will it be restarted next summer?

    TIA


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 893 ✭✭✭HTCOne


    There were direct flights last summer for about 3 months. Anyone any idea how successful the route was & will it be restarted next summer?

    TIA

    I believe they’re adding an extra month this year.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    There were direct flights last summer for about 3 months. Anyone any idea how successful the route was & will it be restarted next summer?

    TIA

    Back and starting earlier I believe just like Calgary.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,609 ✭✭✭adam88


    Hi guys. EI 108 cancelled. Anyone know why??? Is it a eu 261 case ???


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,762 ✭✭✭✭Inquitus


    adam88 wrote: »
    Hi guys. EI 108 cancelled. Anyone know why??? Is it a eu 261 case ???

    Cancelled for Operational Reasons, that should mean you can claim.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,513 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    sherology wrote: »
    Flightglobal seems to have gone to the dogs regarding accuracy/editing... https://www.flightglobal.com/airlines/united-links-san-francisco-and-dublin-from-june-2020/135847.article

    Wow, that's embarrassing, the press release is hardly going to mention the competition on the route now is it :)

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,609 ✭✭✭adam88


    Inquitus wrote: »
    Cancelled for Operational Reasons, that should mean you can claim.

    A1. Friends stranded over in NYC. Very little contact from Aer Lingus. Just goes to show always travel with a good credit card to pay for extra hotel and food


  • Registered Users Posts: 5 Gr123


    Has aer lingus changed some routes. My ei101 to ewr on 26th Jan 2020 is showing on the seat map as a a321neo now rather than a330 this is the same for the return. Any one else notice this?


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 9,933 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    Gr123 wrote: »
    Has aer lingus changed some routes. My ei101 to ewr on 26th Jan 2020 is showing on the seat map as a a321neo now rather than a330 this is the same for the return. Any one else notice this?

    They started alternating the A330/A321 a few weeks ago I think. Was posted here that the original plan was to put the A321LR on the DC route but it was switched due to lack of range.
    Would be interesting to hear the opinion on the experience.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5 Gr123


    I just contacted them to change seats as they never told me, we were in a, c seats and they copied them over like that as there was a middle free so no a, b


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 893 ✭✭✭HTCOne


    Tenger wrote: »
    They started alternating the A330/A321 a few weeks ago I think. Was posted here that the original plan was to put the A321LR on the DC route but it was switched due to lack of range.
    Would be interesting to hear the opinion on the experience.

    I seem to recall reading either on here or the blue website that the 3 LRs delivered so far only have 2 ACTs fitted, all subsequent deliveries from LRD onwards will have 3 fitted. I think MSP is the problem really as regards range for the LR, and EI will need to wait for the XLR before they can serve that with a narrowbody if the 330 isn't a success there. Seeing the success of SEA, who knows where the demand will go on that one.

    I suppose the good thing about the LR is they can pull the ACTs out if they need to and use them purely intra Europe if they want and use the more efficiemt XLR on long haul, or retrofit the third ACT to EI-LRA/B/C if warranted too. IIRC the XLR delivers better range than the 3 ACT LR but with the weight and hold space penalties of 1 ACT, the range advantage coming from the weight saving


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,281 ✭✭✭Stevek101


    Do we know when the A321ceos are due to go?


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Stevek101 wrote: »
    Do we know when the A321ceos are due to go?

    No mention of them leaving yet. I don’t recall what was in the call to investors presentation.


  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement