Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Meath v Dublin El Classico of Gaelic Football

2

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,980 ✭✭✭Big Ears


    fergus1001 wrote: »
    we need to spit Meath in two

    I know they were poor, but that's a bit harsh !


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,790 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    fergus1001 wrote: »
    we need to spit Meath in two

    They did, Meath and Westmeath, sure there would be nothin ya tell da grandkids about had they not done that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,900 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    To be honest I enjoyed it.
    Dublin had to break down Meath's gameplan. Meath were within striking distance for more of the game than many are who play the Dubs.
    It was nice to watch the lads trying to figure out the Meath puzzle heads up.
    But by the end Meath were the ones who looked puzzled.

    At one stage I was hoping to keep Meath to no score!
    A bit disappointed that they did not - it would have made up for a lot of hurt.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,665 ✭✭✭Bonniedog


    Meath came out to have a go, and had they brought their shooting boots it would have been competitive for a lot longer.

    All teams have been overwhelmed in such a manner, and they won't be the last. Hope they recover for the qualifiers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,900 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    In fairness to Meath those conditions did not really suit thier gameplan, Conlon not as effective in conditions like that,
    He needed to be playing on a dry day, with quick low ball coming into him on the counter.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,243 ✭✭✭C__MC


    In fairness to Meath those conditions did not really suit thier gameplan, Conlon not as effective in conditions like that,
    He needed to be playing on a dry day, with quick low ball coming into him on the counter.

    Wouldn't like to see the dubs on a dry day


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,108 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    In fairness to Meath those conditions did not really suit thier gameplan, Conlon not as effective in conditions like that,
    He needed to be playing on a dry day, with quick low ball coming into him on the counter.

    On a dry day we might have scored 10 but you would have scored 15 more. I can safely say if you're over the age of 60 you will probably never see Dublin lose to a leinster championship match ever again. Sad times for the province.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 11,439 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hammer Archer


    RoyalCelt wrote: »
    On a dry day we might have scored 10 but you would have scored 15 more. I can safely say if you're over the age of 60 you will probably never see Dublin lose to a leinster championship match ever again. Sad times for the province.
    Sad times for football in general. The gap between Dublin and the rest just seems to grow every year. To illustrate that, Meath were 16/1 to win today in a two horse race. After Dublin’s All Ireland last year, Dublin were 11/1 to win every single All Ireland championship from 2019 until 2024 (i.e. to go on and do 10 in a row).

    I’ve seen people mention that Donegal are Dublin’s closest challengers. But this is the same Donegal that Meath should have beaten once, if not twice, in the league. Donegal could possibly keep the score within 10 points but Dublin would still win at a canter.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,900 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    RoyalCelt wrote: »
    On a dry day we might have scored 10 but you would have scored 15 more. I can safely say if you're over the age of 60 you will probably never see Dublin lose to a leinster championship match ever again. Sad times for the province.

    I would say things could change very quickly in about 5 years.
    All it take is a poor manager and the whole thing could fall apart.
    I am trying to soak it all up and just admire the play, this team won't last forever. And when I am an auld fella, people will still be talking about this team I think.

    Sure even as a Dub I still shudder, when I think of those old Meath teams where an opposing team would not feel comfortable until they were 7 ahead of Meath.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,790 ✭✭✭✭Strumms



    Donegal could possibly keep the score within 10 points but Dublin would still win at a canter.

    And probably deserve to if they did.

    A rather provocative yet humorous slant from the 42 site...

    “Under par Dublin defeat Meath by 16 points to claim record 9th Leinster crown in-a-row”:pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 736 ✭✭✭TCM


    In fairness to Meath those conditions did not really suit thier gameplan, Conlon not as effective in conditions like that, He needed to be playing on a dry day, with quick low ball coming into him on the counter.


    Indeed. Wouldn't Dublin have been playing on that dry day also.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,665 ✭✭✭Bonniedog


    I would say things could change very quickly in about 5 years.
    All it take is a poor manager and the whole thing could fall apart.
    I am trying to soak it all up and just admire the play, this team won't last forever. And when I am an auld fella, people will still be talking about this team I think.

    Sure even as a Dub I still shudder, when I think of those old Meath teams where an opposing team would not feel comfortable until they were 7 ahead of Meath.


    I'm certain that like Cody, Gavin will try and leave a system behind - assuming either of them ever calls it a day!

    But as Cats regression to the mean proves, systems are only as good as the human resources invested in them.

    From what I see of underage football, Dublin have nothing like the stream coming through which there was ten years ago. And again key factor there was JG and his management team.

    So, it will end.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 11,439 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hammer Archer


    Strumms wrote: »
    And probably deserve to if they did.

    A rather provocative yet humorous slant from the 42 site...

    “Under par Dublin defeat Meath by 16 points to claim record 9th Leinster crown in-a-row”:pac:
    Never said they wouldn’t.
    What’s humorous about that? It seems like a pretty accurate headline. Dublin were poor for long periods by their standards.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,952 ✭✭✭✭Stoner


    Never said they wouldn’t. What’s humorous about that? It seems like a pretty accurate headline. Dublin were poor for long periods by their standards.


    That's true, I couldn't get to the game today, but I was thinking at halftime having watched the Ulster final that a team with forwards like Donegal would be rubbing their hands. Meath got into good positions but just couldn't put it over the bar


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Just signed in to thank the OP, and to say the four best games of football I've ever attended, or watched, were the Dublin-Meath matches in the summer of 1991. The incredible risings from the dead time and time again were just amazing.

    I attended all four of them as a kid and the absolute sense of awe in the crowd each time the score was levelled was just out of this world. The craic and banter between Dublin and Meath fans in all matches was a great tribute to everybody and to our games. I remember one guy was a big inebriated and wanted to start a fight and some other lad jumped in "Ah come on now, lads; we're all Irish here!" and that was the end of it. And there was a huge sense of pride which informed behaviour, and that was in no small part due to the extraordinary quality of each of the four games.

    I've been a great fan of replays ever since, even though at the time some incredible killjoys in the media were demanding that the GAA stop them because apparently supporters were being taken advantage of. The best money I've ever spent on entertainment (along with attending some superb hurling matches in the mid-late 1990s).


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 11,439 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hammer Archer


    Bonniedog wrote: »
    I'm certain that like Cody, Gavin will try and leave a system behind - assuming either of them ever calls it a day!

    But as Cats regression to the mean proves, systems are only as good as the human resources invested in them.

    From what I see of underage football, Dublin have nothing like the stream coming through which there was ten years ago. And again key factor there was JG and his management team.

    So, it will end.
    But to be fair, Dublin don’t need the same stream of talent to come through. All they need is 2 or 3 from every minor/U20 panel to make the grade and replace lads that retire. They’ve got such a strong base that if they manage that, they’re likely to be totally dominant in Leinster at the very least until 2030.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,665 ✭✭✭Bonniedog


    But to be fair, Dublin don’t need the same stream of talent to come through. All they need is 2 or 3 from every minor/U20 panel to make the grade and replace lads that retire. They’ve got such a strong base that if they manage that, they’re likely to be totally dominant in Leinster at the very least until 2030.


    Dublin will always be competitive, but not necessarily dominant. Sonny knows the history better than me but even in Dublin's down years - 1964 - 74, they won one Leinster (1965), one league (1965) and got to another league final against the three in a row Galway side (1967) the year Meath won AI.

    All the big counties have had lean spells including the three great hurling counties, and even Kerry 1986 - 97. The cycle will turn again.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,790 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    Never said they wouldn’t.
    What’s humorous about that? It seems like a pretty accurate headline. Dublin were poor for long periods by their standards.

    Wouldn’t say they were ever ‘poor’ in that game by any standard that’s overstating it but they did go through periods where perhaps they took the foot of the gas for five minutes. Good game management. That’s not to be unexpected or a bad thing when you’ve so many points to play with as well as a great ability to retain the ball and having a full summer schedule ahead.

    I’d be happy for them to win by 12 and leave with a squad of fully fit guys as opposed to busting a gut for 20 with a couple of hamstrings gone. You need to win smart too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,818 ✭✭✭Fann Linn


    Strumms wrote: »
    Wouldn’t say they were ever ‘poor’ in that game by any standard that’s overstating it but they did go through periods where perhaps they took the foot of the gas for five minutes. Good game management. That’s not to be unexpected or a bad thing when you’ve so many points to play with as well as a great ability to retain the ball and having a full summer schedule ahead.

    I’d be happy for them to win by 12 and leave with a squad of fully fit guys as opposed to busting a gut for 20 with a couple of hamstrings gone. You need to win smart too.


    Coasting in second gear and moving into third according to Spillane apparently.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,790 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    Fann Linn wrote: »
    Coasting in second gear and moving into third according to Spillane apparently.


    They coasted in the latter parts of the game but with such a lead and a busy summer ahead that’s smart.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,141 ✭✭✭DellyBelly


    I thought Meath did will to keep it below 20 points. I really thought Dublin would do it by over 20. I can see Meath being very competitive in maybe 5-10 years time. I can't see them beat Dublin in that time but definitely get within 10 or less points.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,652 ✭✭✭Wildly Boaring


    Meath's attack was very ineffective. They could have kept in closer for longer with a bit of inventiveness.

    Easy to say and hard to sort.

    Newman seemed to drift out a lot and really only seemed to leave Conlon v 2 inside.

    If that's going to be the plan guys need to come at pace through the 45 heading for goal.

    They defended well and seemed to sort the kick outs after and early blip. Good to see early subs.

    They actually looked at the races for 40 mins.

    Dubs pulled away and have serious firepower on the bench.

    Gonna be hard for meath in 2 weeks after that finale. Div 1 next year is the real shining light. Onwards and upwards!!!


  • Registered Users Posts: 294 ✭✭TrueGael


    Once a great rivalry, killed stone dead forever thanks to sustained financial doping

    #ThanksHQ


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 594 ✭✭✭Force Carrier


    TrueGael wrote: »
    Once a great rivalry, killed stone dead forever thanks to sustained financial doping

    #ThanksHQ


    Is that why meath kicked wides all day. Money?


    How much money did stafford, o'rourke and flynn get?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,790 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    Meath's attack was very ineffective !

    Yes, I think though Dublin full backs and half backs seemed to play very close together, leaving no space in between the two lines, Meath didn’t seem to have the want to go long and direct as probably thought fruitless due to not having enough physical forwards up there to compete and ended up hitting a brick wall time after time... credit for the Dublin defense for showing that sort of organization, discipline and drive over the 70 minutes. Impressive !


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,108 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Is that why meath kicked wides all day. Money?


    How much money did stafford, o'rourke and flynn get?
    If those lads played today they'd probably be off playing Aussie Rules or just stick with the club.
    Sad times for football in general. The gap between Dublin and the rest just seems to grow every year. To illustrate that, Meath were 16/1 to win today in a two horse race. After Dublin’s All Ireland last year, Dublin were 11/1 to win every single All Ireland championship from 2019 until 2024 (i.e. to go on and do 10 in a row).

    I’ve seen people mention that Donegal are Dublin’s closest challengers. But this is the same Donegal that Meath should have beaten once, if not twice, in the league. Donegal could possibly keep the score within 10 points but Dublin would still win at a canter.
    Donegal are class. I feel if the chasing pack of kerry, Mayo, galway, Tyrone and roscommon and donegal get hammered the sport is ****ed. Players in those counties will eventually lose interest too and as long as Dublin keep winning with Gavin at the helm they won't ease up.

    I predict Dublins team in 10 years will be better then the team now. I wonder how many AI's and Leinster's Dublin will have to win in a row before a county puts forward a motion and the rest vote it in redirecting the funds to other counties that need it. As of now they are either too afraid or don't care enough to kick up a fuss.

    DellyBelly wrote: »
    I thought Meath did will to keep it below 20 points. I really thought Dublin would do it by over 20. I can see Meath being very competitive in maybe 5-10 years time. I can't see them beat Dublin in that time but definitely get within 10 or less points.

    If Meaths hopes are getting with 10 points of Dublin we will struggle to ever get the best 15 players in the county to commit. I do think Meath will be better in 10 years but so will Dublin. The best we can hope for in the next 10 years id5a division 1 league title.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 594 ✭✭✭Force Carrier


    RoyalCelt wrote: »
    in redirecting the funds to other counties that need it.

    So your forwards could kick the ball straight if they had funds is it?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,074 ✭✭✭manofwisdom


    Sad times for football in general. The gap between Dublin and the rest just seems to grow every year. To illustrate that, Meath were 16/1 to win today in a two horse race. After Dublin’s All Ireland last year, Dublin were 11/1 to win every single All Ireland championship from 2019 until 2024 (i.e. to go on and do 10 in a row).

    I’ve seen people mention that Donegal are Dublin’s closest challengers. But this is the same Donegal that Meath should have beaten once, if not twice, in the league. Donegal could possibly keep the score within 10 points but Dublin would still win at a canter.




    Not the same Donegal as they rarely take the league serious at all and why they found themselves in Div 2 to begin with. Everything about them is championship ready/focus, last year they lost by only 5 points to Dublin in Croke Park and have since added Rochford to their management team who as seen with Mayo knows how to competitive v Dublin.



    The amount of effort Meath put into the league has caught up with them it seems as they looked wrecked in the 2nd half v Dublin.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,790 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    The arguing or even mention of funding in the aftermath of the win is nothing but begrudgery. Dollar signs don’t pay for producing players, a team and a setup like they have. The overriding factors involved in EVERYTHING there today, is hard work, teamwork, skill, attitude, organization and desire, to win and be the best. That’s the formula, to be applauded, used as a template. Off the pitch as well as on it. That’s something you won’t take away by ripping up cheques.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,108 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    So your forwards could kick the ball straight if they had funds is it?

    There's no doubt our forwards would be more skillful if we'd over a million a year invested for the development of underage players over the last 20 years. Naturally the standard of coaching and the numbers playing would be much higher.

    That was meaths worst forward performance all year. There's no doubt mentally they were terrified of the Dubs. Can't blame them really and every year that goes by with another big Dublin defeat it will get worse. The problem is the players know that even if they shoot the lights out they'll still likely be well beaten. That can't be easy to burden.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,108 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Strumms wrote: »
    The arguing or even mention of funding in the aftermath of the win is nothing but begrudgery. Dollar signs don’t pay for producing players, a team and a setup like they have. The overriding factors involved in EVERYTHING there today, is hard work, teamwork, skill, attitude, organization and desire, to win and be the best. That’s the formula, to be applauded, used as a template. Off the pitch as well as on it. That’s something you won’t take away by ripping up cheques.
    Are you suggesting the meath players are not giving everything to the cause? They've given up their lives for the cause since last November. With no hope of provincial glory you have to admire their dedication. It can't be easy.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 594 ✭✭✭Force Carrier


    So your forwards could kick the ball straight if they had funds is it?
    RoyalCelt wrote: »
    There's no doubt our forwards would be more skillful if we'd over a million a year invested for the development of underage players over the last 20 years.


    That's bullsh1t. You're shown how to kick a ball when you're five. After that it's practice, practice, practice. And what's in your genes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,399 ✭✭✭✭ThunbergsAreGo


    RoyalCelt wrote: »
    So your forwards could kick the ball straight if they had funds is it?

    There's no doubt our forwards would be more skillful if we'd over a million a year invested for the development of underage players over the last 20 years. Naturally the standard of coaching and the numbers playing would be much higher.

    That was meaths worst forward performance all year. There's no doubt mentally they were terrified of the Dubs. Can't blame them really and every year that goes by with another big Dublin defeat it will get worse. The problem is the players know that even if they shoot the lights out they'll still likely be well beaten. That can't be easy to burden.
    So that takes care of Dublin.

    How does that explain meaths regression beyond many other teams who get less money?

    For all the talk of Dublin killing Leinaterz there is still a chance for all of the province to progress via the qualifiers and it's an age since Meath did anything in that. Hope they can make the super 8s this year. A competitive Meath is good for football


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,138 ✭✭✭rpurfield


    Strumms wrote: »
    The arguing or even mention of funding in the aftermath of the win is nothing but begrudgery. Dollar signs don’t pay for producing players, a team and a setup like they have. The overriding factors involved in EVERYTHING there today, is hard work, teamwork, skill, attitude, organization and desire, to win and be the best. That’s the formula, to be applauded, used as a template. Off the pitch as well as on it. That’s something you won’t take away by ripping up cheques.

    It won't change it now because the system is in place, but you can't deny having the money in the last ten or twelve years to put coaches into schools and run all sorts of courses and all that comes with it has created the system. If you can't see that you are ignoring what's plain as day. However I'd agree suddenly cutting the funding now won't pull Dublin back into the pack. You've a highly sucessful team that sponsors want to be associated with and a lot of people look up to, that creates it's own momentum. The move now needs to be for some of the money to go elsewhere to try and drag some other teams up to the level that Leinster becomes a competition again.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,665 ✭✭✭Bonniedog


    RoyalCelt wrote: »
    Are you suggesting the meath players are not giving everything to the cause? They've given up their lives for the cause since last November. With no hope of provincial glory you have to admire their dedication. It can't be easy.


    the logic of what you said above implies that Dublin players are being paid, and that this is the difference between them and Meath.

    Is that the reason Ballyboden under McEntee would quite possibly have beaten Meath when Boden were at their best?

    There is such a thing as better players and teams.

    Meath used to be that.


  • Registered Users Posts: 181 ✭✭gmurphy70


    El Classico is right, that was possibly the worst performance in a Leinster final ever? Putrid stuff..


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,800 ✭✭✭Always_Running


    gmurphy70 wrote: »
    El Classico is right, that was possibly the worst performance in a Leinster final ever? Putrid stuff..


    2nd half was very poor by Meath. At least 1st half they were competitive just four points down and had held Dublin to a mere 0-5.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,108 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    naughtb4 wrote: »
    So that takes care of Dublin.

    How does that explain meaths regression beyond many other teams who get less money?

    For all the talk of Dublin killing Leinaterz there is still a chance for all of the province to progress via the qualifiers and it's an age since Meath did anything in that. Hope they can make the super 8s this year. A competitive Meath is good for football
    Meath this year made it back to Div 1 in who knows how long. Being destroyed by Dublin doesn't mean you've regressed. We've definitely improved. Hopefully they do themselves justice the next day out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,399 ✭✭✭✭ThunbergsAreGo


    RoyalCelt wrote: »
    Meath this year made it back to Div 1 in who knows how long. Being destroyed by Dublin doesn't mean you've regressed. We've definitely improved. Hopefully they do themselves justice the next day out.

    100% agree, and that is a great thing. Division 1 football will bring them on massively.

    The problem is your "who knows how long".


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,790 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    rpurfield wrote: »
    It won't change it now because the system is in place, but you can't deny having the money in the last ten or twelve years to put coaches into schools and run all sorts of courses and all that comes with it has created the system. If you can't see that you are ignoring what's plain as day. However I'd agree suddenly cutting the funding now won't pull Dublin back into the pack. You've a highly sucessful team that sponsors want to be associated with and a lot of people look up to, that creates it's own momentum. The move now needs to be for some of the money to go elsewhere to try and drag some other teams up to the level that Leinster becomes a competition again.

    I think that would be illegal, if say Ryanair gave the Dubs 200,000 euros to advertise on the back of the jersey for two years. For the GAA to insist that Dublin hand over 35% or whatever to be redistributed without seeking their agreement to do so, just demanding it is both unethical AND possibly illegal. Certainly unethical. Same if it was Cork or any other county.

    If the GAA want to support lesser financially comfortable counties with grants, ok, I get. But to be taxing and penalizing a county extra to accomplish this is wrong. Just by virtue of their success.

    If EVERY county had to commit something...say...

    10% of their revenue back or top earning 15%.... that ‘could’ be agreeable if the money was redistributed in an open, transparent, fair and even manner. Seen to be giving a leg up to the most needy based on a purposeful request for the likes of...

    Stadium upgrade...
    Team bus...
    New clubhouse and office ETC.


  • Registered Users Posts: 135 ✭✭Squareball


    I think the year in division 1 will do Meath the power of good. They were not physically ready for yesterday but that will come. I come from a generation of Dubs where Meath caused me nightmares.....I'm hoping that might happen again some day soon. It was brutal, heart stopping, caused me to go to mass on a Sunday Morning and very often thought god was a Meath man. Lived through the 70's too and the Kerry rivalry is still fresh in my mind. Don't get me wrong, what I am witnessing today is remarkable, mind blowing and everything else you want to call it but a competitive rival in Leinster offers different memories.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,424 ✭✭✭Felexicon


    RoyalCelt wrote: »
    Meath this year made it back to Div 1 in who knows how long. Being destroyed by Dublin doesn't mean you've regressed. We've definitely improved. Hopefully they do themselves justice the next day out.

    13 years. Plenty of people know.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,424 ✭✭✭Felexicon


    Strumms wrote: »
    The arguing or even mention of funding in the aftermath of the win is nothing but begrudgery. Dollar signs don’t pay for producing players, a team and a setup like they have. The overriding factors involved in EVERYTHING there today, is hard work, teamwork, skill, attitude, organization and desire, to win and be the best. That’s the formula, to be applauded, used as a template. Off the pitch as well as on it. That’s something you won’t take away by ripping up cheques.

    They literally do.

    There is no denying this current period of Dublin dominance has seen some the the greatest players of all time pull on the blue jersey. But to say that the introduction of a GPO in every club in the county (which is a direct consequence of additional funding) has not had an affect on this is nonsense.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,806 ✭✭✭corny


    Felexicon wrote: »
    They literally do.

    There is no denying this current period of Dublin dominance has seen some the the greatest players of all time pull on the blue jersey. But to say that the introduction of a GPO in every club in the county (which is a direct consequence of additional funding) has not had an affect on this is nonsense.

    How do you counter Whealans argument that most of the lads who won in 2011 were out of school when the development money kicked? And if the development money is so releveant why have Dublin produced poor (relatively) underage teams for the last few years? If it is so important surely you'd expect to see dominance across all levels but especially underage level. That seems compelling evidence to suggest Jim Gavin and the culture at Senior level are the problem for the rest for the country. Kildare and Meath have no problem beating the development money when they're under 18.

    The funding debate has its merits but there are too many fools with green eyes leading the charge imo. They're purposely out to devalue the achievements of a brilliant generation of players.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,243 ✭✭✭C__MC


    Only 7 of the team that started in 2016 final played yesterday


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,806 ✭✭✭corny


    C__MC wrote: »
    Only 7 of the team that started in 2016 final played yesterday

    And the lads who replaced them are literally all from the same minor team in 2011. A Tyrone golden generation effect if you will.

    Look they're not being grown by euros in an incubation chamber. During all the time of swimming in this money we've had one brilliant minor team. Just one. McCaffrey, Costello, KK, Mannion, Scully, Byrne, Small, Lowndes and Fenton (same age group but didn't make the team) all in the same year. They didn't even win ffs. What happened to the Tipp team that beat them? Maybe a lack of money meant they forgot how to play football when they became adults. If money was the primary driver Dublins senior team would be made up of one or two players from each year the funds have been in place.

    Lots of group think involved in this debate. People repeating in an echo chamber that games development funds created Dublin dominance. But the evidence would suggest funds haven't really delivered a sustained effect for Dublin. Arguably we've had a dreadful return when you look at the talent coming through in Kerry. Jim Gavin and the culture within the group at senior level are greater influences of Dublins success. I don't see how that can be disputed if the observer is truly impartial.

    But then again games development isn't about creating a super Dublin. Its about getting people playing gaelic games in the capital. A great success in this regard and I'd dismiss anyone who laments that tbh.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,980 ✭✭✭Big Ears


    corny wrote: »
    What happened to the Tipp team that beat them? Maybe a lack of money meant they forgot how to play football when they became adults.

    2 of them won an All-Ireland hurling title in 2016, one signed for the Sydney Swans, having been nominated for An All-Star and was Tipperary's best player at the time of leaving (just turned 20).
    Michael Quinlivan has obviously been a standout player for the team, and one most counties would want to have.

    Interestingly Bill Maher, Liam McGrath and John Meagher are another 3 who are currently serving the Senior team from that 2011 team. All 3 have been part of the Senior hurling set up at some stage.

    Interestingly several of the Dublin minor players you named played underage hurling for Dublin.
    Perhaps the problem in Tipperary isn't enough money, but too much of it is being spent on handcrafted ash !


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,363 ✭✭✭✭rossie1977


    corny wrote: »
    How do you counter Whealans argument that most of the lads who won in 2011 were out of school when the development money kicked? And if the development money is so releveant why have Dublin produced poor (relatively) underage teams for the last few years?

    Don't want to get into money debate but Dublin won 7 Leinster Under 21 titles between 2009-17. Four All Irelands at that level during that period.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,424 ✭✭✭Felexicon


    corny wrote: »
    How do you counter Whealans argument that most of the lads who won in 2011 were out of school when the development money kicked? And if the development money is so releveant why have Dublin produced poor (relatively) underage teams for the last few years? If it is so important surely you'd expect to see dominance across all levels but especially underage level. That seems compelling evidence to suggest Jim Gavin and the culture at Senior level are the problem for the rest for the country. Kildare and Meath have no problem beating the development money when they're under 18.

    The funding debate has its merits but there are too many fools with green eyes leading the charge imo. They're purposely out to devalue the achievements of a brilliant generation of players.

    Because it is possible for the stars to align and a crop of incredibly talented players to come along at the same time. We've seen this in numerous counties throughout the years.

    It's the conveyor belt of talent that is now coming through which is worrying the rest of the country.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,138 ✭✭✭rpurfield


    Strumms wrote: »
    I think that would be illegal, if say Ryanair gave the Dubs 200,000 euros to advertise on the back of the jersey for two years. For the GAA to insist that Dublin hand over 35% or whatever to be redistributed without seeking their agreement to do so, just demanding it is both unethical AND possibly illegal. Certainly unethical. Same if it was Cork or any other county.

    If the GAA want to support lesser financially comfortable counties with grants, ok, I get. But to be taxing and penalizing a county extra to accomplish this is wrong. Just by virtue of their success.

    If EVERY county had to commit something...say...

    10% of their revenue back or top earning 15%.... that ‘could’ be agreeable if the money was redistributed in an open, transparent, fair and even manner. Seen to be giving a leg up to the most needy based on a purposeful request for the likes of...

    Stadium upgrade...
    Team bus...
    New clubhouse and office ETC.

    I was referring to the grant money. Unless the whole structure of sponsorship becomes centralised you couldn't take money off a Dublin or Kerry because a company wants to give them two million say, and pass a section of it to another county.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement