BusConnects Dublin - Bus Network Changes Discussion

sharper · 22-10-2018 4:37pm

CatInABox wrote: »

I also don't get the objection that they didn't reach out to disability groups. A better bus network will be better for everyone, including disabled groups.

When the car restriction was proposed for the quays one of the objections was that old people and the disabled need to be able to drive into the city centre.

There are a number of elements that don't care at all about anyone's need for public transport, only what suits their ambitions. Tricking people into voting against their own self interest is clever if you can manage but requires a fair degree of sociopathy to pull off.

MJohnston · 22-10-2018 4:38pm

I've submitted a complaint to the Digital Editor of the Irish Times about that article. May be useless (although if I don't see a correction I'll complain to the Ombudsman next) but I can't do nothing, and I'm fed up with these kinds of small inaccuracies or lies just sliding by without comment.

.G. · 22-10-2018 5:29pm

sharper wrote: »

You'd imagine the real story is a vulnerable member of society being needlessly distressed by incorrect information that certainly did not originate with the NTA.

That same person was then motivated to campaign against their own interest stop something that improves their transport links.

This puts the madness of it all perfectly in focus. I'd tweet that back to him if I were you.

dublinman1990 · 22-10-2018 5:39pm

The lady moaning about her front gardens in that IT article, my god, talk about having unbelievable excess while purposely keeping up with the joneses at the same time. Haha. But seriously though; what level of good is she giving here that her complaint in losing some of her garden is actually justified to other average joe soaps in society. She comes across to others as a very elite form of NIMBYsim towards others as it's quite depressing to hear this level of resistance from the likes of her.

Zebra3 · 22-10-2018 5:50pm

marno21 wrote: »

Fact checking and perspective when it comes to infrastructure projects in Ireland is on existing. Joan Burton was ranting in the Dail about how outrageous it was that Jarrett Walker was paid €615k for this project. I would doubt that she checked this price compared to similar vendors or comparative international examples of money spent on similar amount of work

The irony of Joan Burton ranting about the overpaid....

bk · 22-10-2018 6:05pm

What, just 615k for what looks like an incredibly solid plan and then having to put up with and deal with the nonsense from the NBRU and others! Sounds like incredible value to me.

Remember he has a staff of a dozen or so, it isn't all going in his pocket. To be honest, I had assumed a couple million for quality consultancy work and detailed planning like this.

BonnieSituation · 22-10-2018 6:23pm

bk wrote: »

What, just 615k for what looks like an incredibly solid plan and then having to put up with and deal with the nonsense from the NBRU and others! Sounds like incredible value to me.

Remember he has a staff of a dozen or so, it isn't all going in his pocket. To be honest, I had assumed a couple million for quality consultancy work and detailed planning like this.

It's a steal.

Given I worked in a planning consultancy last year and saw what we charged for piddly projects, this is nothing. But WE aren't the ones that need to be convinced.

devnull · 22-10-2018 6:35pm

The journo is now playing dumb, even when BusConnects correct him, he continues to deny!

https://twitter.com/magicbathtub/status/1054418913319157761

It seems the standard of journalism is even worse than I thought, not only are they spouting incorrect information, but they are also now refusing to back down when proven to be incorrect.

Considering all of the articles in the IT about BusConnects, from the woman with the massive garden and now this and all of the rest of it, I think it's reasonable to ask exactly why is the IT going all out against BusConnects?

MJohnston · 22-10-2018 7:29pm

devnull wrote: »

The journo is now playing dumb, even when BusConnects correct him, he continues to deny!

https://twitter.com/magicbathtub/status/1054418913319157761

It seems the standard of journalism is even worse than I thought, not only are they spouting incorrect information, but they are also now refusing to back down when proven to be incorrect.

Considering all of the articles in the IT about BusConnects, from the woman with the massive garden and now this and all of the rest of it, I think it's reasonable to ask exactly why is the IT going all out against BusConnects?

Even if Mr Murray needed to go into the city centre for whatever reason, there's the A1 (which would be an extra couple minutes walk to the stop, potentially) which goes right into town, where we can get off at Gardiner street and walk over to Busaras Red Line. This would be essentially equivalent to his current journey, perhaps safer because he doesn't have to cross Amiens Street.

One thing is for sure, whoever told him he'd have to switch 5 or 6 times is a despicable liar.

sharper · 22-10-2018 8:12pm

devnull wrote: »

Considering all of the articles in the IT about BusConnects, from the woman with the massive garden and now this and all of the rest of it, I think it's reasonable to ask exactly why is the IT going all out against BusConnects?

It can be hard to differentiate between modern outrage driven clickbait journalism and an actual position on anything but whatever they have against bus connects they also had against traffic restrictions on the quays

https://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/taking-cars-out-of-dublin-capital-getting-ready-for-new-restrictions-1.3059524

For motorists travelling west to east along the north quays, who are forced to turn left on to O’Connell Street, the shortest diversion route to return to the riverside at Custom House Quay would be 2.7km.

The same journey can currently be made in 550m.

I'm sure few at the Irish Times and even less at Fianna Fáil actually make use of Dublin Bus so really it's just a convenient issue to fling mud over.

Spanish Eyes · 22-10-2018 9:00pm

Might take another five years ( being optimistic here) for bus transport to improve.

The good of the many should outweigh the perceived problems of the few.

But we all know that the few often have the loudest voices.

I am sorry now, but I am not optimistic at the moment. Leaving aside the fact that it seems to take a generation to change anything in this country, the voices of the few will feed into local reps in an election year to come too.

Sigh....

AndrewJRenko · 22-10-2018 9:05pm

CatInABox wrote: »

I also don't get the objection that they didn't reach out to disability groups. A better bus network will be better for everyone, including disabled groups.

There are particular issues for some people with disabilities that don't apply to the most of the rest of the population. Changing buses is much more difficult for people with disabilities than for others.

Walker is aware of this, based on what I've seen him talking about over recent years. But some targetted consultation and targeted response would have been helpful. Public bodies have explicit legal obligations to ensure services are accessible to people with and without disabilities. It would also have avoided the possibilities of some of the whinging that we're seeing now.

circular flexing · 22-10-2018 10:37pm

I wonder if something like this would address some of the issues that disabled users are pointing out

https://www.translink.ca/Rider-Guide/Accessible-Transit/HandyDART.aspx

Pseudorandom · 22-10-2018 11:07pm

MJohnston wrote: »

I've submitted a complaint to the Digital Editor of the Irish Times about that article. May be useless (although if I don't see a correction I'll complain to the Ombudsman next) but I can't do nothing, and I'm fed up with these kinds of small inaccuracies or lies just sliding by without comment.

How did you do that? Is there an email address? Because honestly I'd like to complain as well. Journalism shouldn't be about just reporting what is said, some basic fact checking should be done.

Edited to add: Sorry I see the email address for digital editor is here
https://www.irishtimes.com/about-us/contact-us

The only official complaints link I can find is for offensive comments on articles.

MJohnston · 22-10-2018 11:13pm

Pseudorandom wrote: »

How did you do that? Is there an email address? Because honestly I'd like to complain as well. Journalism shouldn't be about just reporting what is said, some basic fact checking should be done.

Edited to add: Sorry I see the email address for digital editor is here
https://www.irishtimes.com/about-us/contact-us

The only official complaints link I can find is for offensive comments on articles.

The Press Council of Ireland's Code of Practice specifically says:

Principle 1 − Truth and Accuracy
1.1 In reporting news and information, the press shall strive at all times for truth and accuracy.
1.2 When a significant inaccuracy, misleading statement or distorted report or picture has been published, it shall be corrected promptly and with due prominence.
1.3 When appropriate, a retraction, apology, clarification, explanation or response shall be published promptly and with due prominence.

So there's a responsibility that they have that they're abandoning. If the Irish Times editor doesn't respond, I will be following up with the PCI.

devnull · 23-10-2018 9:06am

Well it's been retweeted 20 times and liked 60 times so unfortunately it seems that such inaccurate news is being lapped up by people, as the scaremongering of transforming our bus services continues.

Will actively avoid the Irish Times now, making money and clickbait is surely more important than being accurate and that is a scary slope for this country to be getting into, when you look at the state of the UK press who have the same principles.

Conway635 · 23-10-2018 9:08am

MJohnston wrote: »

Even if Mr Murray needed to go into the city centre for whatever reason, there's the A1 (which would be an extra couple minutes walk to the stop, potentially) which goes right into town, where we can get off at Gardiner street and walk over to Busaras Red Line. This would be essentially equivalent to his current journey, perhaps safer because he doesn't have to cross Amiens Street.

One thing is for sure, whoever told him he'd have to switch 5 or 6 times is a despicable liar.

The article is grossly misleading.

Bear in mind that it states "For a distance of 5km as the crow flies, his twice daily changover will become a six stage ordeal"

First off, "as the crow flies" clearly implies that we are talking about an end to end direct journey, and that any detours on the way are only due to the geometry of the transport network. This makes the omission of the direct N4 bus route all the more misleading. It is clearly implied that there is no comparable direct service under Bus Connects.

If the writer knows of a reason why the user must detour via the city centre, there is no reason to use the "as the crow flies" comparison, as it is irrelevent.

But look at what else is being done in that single sentence. there is a "bait and switch" operation, whereby the number of interchanges needed in the "now" condition (two) is compared with the number of journey segments (six) in the Bus Connects version. Thus two becomes six . . which seems really bad.

It should be either:

two daily changovers becomes four

or

four existing segments becomes six

The "apples and oranges" comparison used is misleading, and misleading in the direction of the slant of the article.

And that's even ignoring the actual point that two daily changes could become zero with Bus Connects, and four daily segments become two !!

C635

cherryghost · 23-10-2018 10:40am

Not the first or last time Irish Times pushes an agenda with misinformation. Infuriating reading that article and representative TDs agreeing with it on Twitter(again an agenda thank you FF).

Bray Head · 23-10-2018 10:51am

cherryghost wrote: »

Not the first or last time Irish Times pushes an agenda with misinformation. Infuriating reading that article and representative TDs agreeing with it on Twitter(again an agenda thank you FF).

The Irish Times is constantly, chronically negative about any public transport improvements in Dublin.

Constantly seeking out sob stories while missing the fact that small improvements multiplied by hundreds of thousands of people is a really big deal.

Hurrache · 23-10-2018 10:53am

devnull wrote: »

Well it's been retweeted 20 times and liked 60 times so unfortunately it seems that such inaccurate news is being lapped up by people, as the scaremongering of transforming our bus services continues.

Retweets and likes don't necessarily mean endorsements. People retweet to other people as a way to say, here, have a read of this nonsense. Or like things in order to bookmark.

schemingbohemia · 23-10-2018 11:39am

circular flexing wrote: »

I wonder if something like this would address some of the issues that disabled users are pointing out

https://www.translink.ca/Rider-Guide/Accessible-Transit/HandyDART.aspx

Dublin Bus already have this or something very like it

http://www.dublinbus.ie/Your-Journey1/Accessibility/Travel-Assistance-Scheme/

Shedite27 · 23-10-2018 12:40pm

devnull wrote: »

Considering all of the articles in the IT about BusConnects, from the woman with the massive garden and now this and all of the rest of it, I think it's reasonable to ask exactly why is the IT going all out against BusConnects?

Poor people take the bus
People with massive gardens in Terenure buy the Irish Times

Amirani · 23-10-2018 1:53pm

MJohnston wrote: »

I've submitted a complaint to the Digital Editor of the Irish Times about that article. May be useless (although if I don't see a correction I'll complain to the Ombudsman next) but I can't do nothing, and I'm fed up with these kinds of small inaccuracies or lies just sliding by without comment.

I did similar this afternoon:

Hi,

I wish to cancel my digital subscription to the Irish Times.

I've been a regular user of the subscription and typically buy the physical paper at the weekend. I've become increasingly frustrated at the lack of journalistic integrity around the reporting on BusConnects. The following article is a particularly crass instance of this: https://www.irishtimes.com/news/social-affairs/blind-man-s-view-busconnects-fails-me-it-should-be-all-inclusive-1.3670960

This was posted yesterday with completely inaccurate information, information that is easily verifiable. The reality of the situation has been clarified by the NTA (https://twitter.com/BusConnects/status/1054300368954421248) and the Irish Times have made no efforts to clarify the truth of the matter in their original article, let alone issue a retraction (has the man in question even been informed?). In an era where fake news abounds, I'm happy to pay for journalism that investigates properly and reports on facts. The Irish Times just doesn't seem to be willing to follow that philosophy.

Thanks,
Amirani

Amirani · 23-10-2018 1:57pm

Shedite27 wrote: »

Poor people take the bus
People with massive gardens in Terenure buy the Irish Times

I don't think gross generalisations help. I buy the Irish Times, I have a small/moderate sized garden in an area beside Terenure and I take the bus regularly.

The problem isn't with people being for or against BusConnects, it's with supposedly reputable source spouting misinformation.

Hotblack Desiato · 23-10-2018 3:00pm

A letter to the editor might have had more impact.

MJohnston · 23-10-2018 3:09pm

Hotblack Desiato wrote: »

A letter to the editor might have had more impact.

Nah, I'm not interested in boosting their page views by providing argumentative clickbait. It is a factual error, and not an opinion that needs to be debated.

AndrewJRenko · 23-10-2018 3:16pm

Amirani wrote: »

I did similar this afternoon:

Hi,

I wish to cancel my digital subscription to the Irish Times.

I've been a regular user of the subscription and typically buy the physical paper at the weekend. I've become increasingly frustrated at the lack of journalistic integrity around the reporting on BusConnects. The following article is a particularly crass instance of this: https://www.irishtimes.com/news/social-affairs/blind-man-s-view-busconnects-fails-me-it-should-be-all-inclusive-1.3670960

This was posted yesterday with completely inaccurate information, information that is easily verifiable. The reality of the situation has been clarified by the NTA (https://twitter.com/BusConnects/status/1054300368954421248) and the Irish Times have made no efforts to clarify the truth of the matter in their original article, let alone issue a retraction (has the man in question even been informed?). In an era where fake news abounds, I'm happy to pay for journalism that investigates properly and reports on facts. The Irish Times just doesn't seem to be willing to follow that philosophy.

Thanks,
Amirani

Fair play. You might want to share this on Twitter - could get a bit of attention there.

loyatemu · 23-10-2018 3:19pm

Shedite27 wrote: »

Poor people take the bus
People with massive gardens in Terenure buy the Irish Times

on permanent rotation in the IT office:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HaSi2Z74Ou8

Shedite27 · 23-10-2018 3:27pm

Amirani wrote: »

I don't think gross generalisations help. I buy the Irish Times, I have a small/moderate sized garden in an area beside Terenure and I take the bus regularly.

The problem isn't with people being for or against BusConnects, it's with supposedly reputable source spouting misinformation.

Yup, I was giving my opinion as to why it was spouting misinformation

(I'm also a bus-using IT reader)

circular flexing · 23-10-2018 3:28pm

schemingbohemia wrote: »

circular flexing wrote: »

I wonder if something like this would address some of the issues that disabled users are pointing out

https://www.translink.ca/Rider-Guide/Accessible-Transit/HandyDART.aspx

Dublin Bus already have this or something very like it

http://www.dublinbus.ie/Your-Journey1/Accessibility/Travel-Assistance-Scheme/

That’s not the same at all. HandyDART is a network of buses that provide point to point service for disabled users for the cost of a regular fare.

schemingbohemia · 23-10-2018 6:03pm

circular flexing wrote: »

That’s not the same at all. HandyDART is a network of buses that provide point to point service for disabled users for the cost of a regular fare.

Sorry I looked at the start of it and saw someone helping someone onto the bus and thought it was the same.:o

Podge_irl · 23-10-2018 6:32pm

circular flexing wrote: »

That’s not the same at all. HandyDART is a network of buses that provide point to point service for disabled users for the cost of a regular fare.

It is a Dial-A-Bus service. Which makes more sense. Instead we pretend the current service works and that Busconnects will destroy it. Even if the BC will improve the lives of 95% of people it really isn't that hard to find the 5% and the IT is pretending that that is reporting.

Stephen15 · 23-10-2018 7:50pm

Closer to home TFL has a dial a ride service has done since the 1970s I think too. It's more something which would benefit people with disabilities who cannot currently access Dublin's public transport system rather than as a replacement for services lost due to Bus Connects. However I would be sceptical about how nessecary it would be these days considering public transport is more accessible for persons with disabilities than ever before.

GarrettRodgers · 23-10-2018 9:20pm

More than the other problems with The Irish Times article, I wonder if anyone has gotten in contact with Mr. Murray. As a blind man, he is completely dependant on others to read maps for him. I've sent the journo an email asking him to get in contact.

MJohnston · 23-10-2018 9:47pm

GarrettRodgers wrote: »

More than the other problems with The Irish Times article, I wonder if anyone has gotten in contact with Mr. Murray. As a blind man, he is completely dependant on others to read maps for him. I've sent the journo an email asking him to get in contact.

Yeah, that's what I tweeted at him and the Irish Times about. Zero response. Also mentioned it to the digital editor. Zero response.

AlekSmart · 23-10-2018 10:39pm

MJohnston wrote: »

Yeah, that's what I tweeted at him and the Irish Times about. Zero response. Also mentioned it to the digital editor. Zero response.

I very much doubt that you'll get much meaningful response.

Most of these journalistic set-pieces will have been orchestrated on a parallell level,usually by somebody with skin-in-the-game,and with a predetermined result in mind.

Journalism,of the Woodward & Bernstein variety,is largely dead in the water,now that the "Quality" organs recruit straight from College.

The reality of Busconnects representing the first major reorganization of Dublins Bus Services in 40 years is lost upon many,as is the reality of over €750,000,000 in direct funding actually being in place,as opposed to requiring approval or acccquisition.

There has NEVER been a more positive time for Bus Transport in Dublin,but it will not hang about for long,either we grab it and work with it,or we kiss our bus service goodbye in favour of yet more multi-story car parks and shopping malls USA style !

GarrettRodgers · 23-10-2018 10:50pm

MJohnston wrote: »

Yeah, that's what I tweeted at him and the Irish Times about. Zero response. Also mentioned it to the digital editor. Zero response.

He got back to me stating Mr. Murray does know his options. I wrote back saying I think he's gotten that wrong and why and to get in touch with him if the options I've prevented make sense to get in touch with the man. I'll take him at his word.

stephenjmcd · 24-10-2018 7:38am

First time poster to this thread and bus connects is something which is badly needed. Will it happen who knows??

However one thing that stands out for me is they promise quicker journey times. How can that be delivered on when current Dublin bus journey times are only getting worse. Some drivers can do a route in half the time of others.

For example this morning's 6.10 145 to town took 1 hour 20 minutes from bray to pearse street. Simply because of driver slowness, while others will do it in 50 minutes given the time of morning.

Nothing will improve until there is consistency

StreetLight · 24-10-2018 8:16am

stephenjmcd wrote: »

First time poster to this thread and bus connects is something which is badly needed. Will it happen who knows??

However one thing that stands out for me is they promise quicker journey times. How can that be delivered on when current Dublin bus journey times are only getting worse. Some drivers can do a route in half the time of others.

For example this morning's 6.10 145 to town took 1 hour 20 minutes from bray to pearse street. Simply because of driver slowness, while others will do it in 50 minutes given the time of morning.

Nothing will improve until there is consistency

But everyone is different, so the only way is intermediate timing points strictly adhered to. It may mean a bus waiting several minutes at certain points until the correct departure time is reached.

haulier · 24-10-2018 8:44am

Maybe put an earlier bus on the 145 ? 0730 would appear to be a little late for the first bus to city centre to be arriving at.There are a few buses based in Bray that could be used.

Or maybe put one of the two early staff buses into the timetable, for the benefit of the travelling public who need to be in the city before 0700 ??

Its been going on a while - the solution is not rocket science, but does appear to be beyond solving.

stephenjmcd · 24-10-2018 9:01am

haulier wrote: »

Maybe put an earlier bus on the 145 ? 0730 would appear to be a little late for the first bus to city centre to be arriving at.There are a few buses based in Bray that could be used.

Or maybe put one of the two early staff buses into the timetable, for the benefit of the travelling public who need to be in the city before 0700 ??

Its been going on a while - the solution is not rocket science, but does appear to be beyond solving.

I agree, 7.30 is way too late. It can vary between 7.10 and the extreme of 7.30 some days simply depending on who is driving.

The solution is of course an earlier departure than 6.10 but as you said it's been going on a while, people know the solutions however we see plan after plan and no implementation

Hotblack Desiato · 24-10-2018 10:26am

Some years ago I used to get the 14 occasionally, there was one driver who was chronically slow, very annoying when you get on the bus in good time for work and are then left wondering if you'll make it or not just down to the whims of one guy who wouldn't exceed 20MPH.

Letter in today's Irish Times:

https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/letters/busconnects-and-journey-times-1.3673278

BusConnects and journey times

Sir, – In a news item in your edition of October 22nd, it is claimed that under the BusConnects redesign of the bus network in Dublin, a journey from bus stop 1190 on Collins Avenue to Spencer Dock will require two buses and a Luas, compared to the current one bus and a Luas. One passenger is quoted as saying that he currently takes the 14 bus to Connolly Station, and changes to the Luas to complete his journey to the Spencer Dock area. It is further claimed that under the new plan, a passenger travelling from Collins Avenue to Spencer Dock will be required to walk further to a different bus stop. They will then be required to take a northbound bus towards Artane, before they can board a city-bound bus service which will bring them to a Luas Red Line.

None of this is true. In fact, far from becoming a “six-stage ordeal”, as claimed in the piece, under our proposals the journey between bus stop 1190 on Collins Avenue and Spencer Dock will be a better and more direct service. The proposed N4 route will run along Collins Avenue and will stop at the existing stop number 1190. It will then continue towards the Howth Road and along the East Wall Road, terminating in Spencer Dock. This will be a direct route with no bus or Luas change required, unlike the existing journey taken by the passenger quoted. Just as significantly, the N4 route will run every 10 minutes all day, a very high frequency and much more frequent than the existing 14 bus service to Connolly Station. – Yours, etc,

ANNE GRAHAM,

Chief Executive Officer,

National Transport

Authority,

Harcourt Lane, Dublin 2.

The Irish Times should print a retraction and an apology though. Disgraceful tabloid-style "journalism", put that lad back on making the tea (if he can manage that.)

marno21 · 26-10-2018 12:59pm

Irish Times have been busy again. 2 BusConnects articles today

https://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/nta-cannot-attend-local-representatives-meetings-about-busconnects-1.3675826

https://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/busconnects-plan-south-dublin-council-has-major-concern-1.3675882

dublinman1990 · 27-10-2018 2:19am

SG 471 has an experimental white coloured LED display fitted on the front of the bus.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/darren_hall/45570540571/in/faves-48770310@N05/

Is this idea of experimenting with the colour of these LED displays part of BusConnects?

prinzeugen · 27-10-2018 2:35am

dublinman1990 wrote: »

SG 471 has an experimental white coloured LED display fitted on the front of the bus.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/darren_hall/45570540571/in/faves-48770310@N05/

Is this idea of experimenting with the colour of these LED displays part of BusConnects?

Thats unreadable. Yes its nice and clear close up, what we need is a modern version of the older blinds that you could read from 500 yrds away.

White is another headlight in traffic for some with vision problems.

CatInABox · 27-10-2018 10:20am

Another day, another Irish Times article.

In fairness, I can't disagree with what the article says, it's about Transport Infrastructure Ireland's submission to the BusConnects consultation and the NTA's response.

“NTA and TII are working together to identify and exploit all opportunities to add additional bus facilities,” an NTA spokeswoman said.

“At the moment TII is developing proposals to widen the N3, which is the road the Blanchardstown core bus corridor will travel on, and the NTA is collaborating with TII to provide additional bus lanes as part of that proposal.”

Stephen15 · 27-10-2018 12:23pm

prinzeugen wrote: »

Thats unreadable. Yes its nice and clear close up, what we need is a modern version of the older blinds that you could read from 500 yrds away.

White is another headlight in traffic for some with vision problems.

I'd agree it is quite hard to see. The problem with roller blinds is there is difficulty adding new places to them whereas LED can easily be changed to accommodate new place names and new routes being added to the system. The displays on Lothian buses for example look well are white and quite visible. London uses roller blinds but the destinations are unlikely to change over there.

I think it's always going to be difficult to display place names in Ireland when we have to have destinations displayed in two languages.

Bob the Builder · 02-11-2018 3:53pm

MJohnston wrote: »

I've submitted a complaint to the Digital Editor of the Irish Times about that article. May be useless (although if I don't see a correction I'll complain to the Ombudsman next) but I can't do nothing, and I'm fed up with these kinds of small inaccuracies or lies just sliding by without comment.

There's still being no correctons/refutes/retractions on this from what I can see? Disappointing that the Irish Times coverage has become so out of touch with reality.

bk · 02-11-2018 4:15pm

The NTA instead offered to provide hard copies of brochures for the Dublin southwest area, and Powerpoint slides showing details about the revised network.

I attended one of these local meetings, in fairness, there most have been over 100 very high quality brochures from the NTA there, focused on the routes of my local areas. Plus slides and big map print outs on the wall.

The councillor who had organised the meeting had also previously meet with the NTA and was pretty well informed, I was pretty impressed with this councillor. I was however unimpressed by the Minister who turned up half way through.

It would have been better if someone from the NTA was there, but it would have been a hard job with the screaming lad from PBP there shouting nonsense and the hundred or so OAPs who just don't want change full stop and aren't interested in listening.

CatInABox · 03-11-2018 2:44am

This gave me a good laugh, the Irish Times opines on the future of Dublin.

"Official defensiveness and political cowardice, along with deep-seated inertia, have obstructed innovation in the city", which is accurate, but totally ignores their own behaviour when it comes to projects that are innovative. Their behaviour around BusConnects and Metrolink is nothing short of appalling.

BusConnects Dublin - Bus Network Changes Discussion

Comments