Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Brexit discussion thread XIII (Please read OP before posting)

19192949697195

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,516 ✭✭✭✭kowloon


    So I get that the cutoff time is the last second of 2020 but, effectively, when do talks stop? I assume nobody is planning on celebrating the New Year in a conference room.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,381 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty


    kowloon wrote: »
    So I get that the cutoff time is the last second of 2020 but, effectively, when do talks stop? I assume nobody is planning on celebrating the New Year in a conference room.

    General consensus is that Monday is effectively make or break time. Lots of speculation in the Brexiteer media that things can be pushed back and the EU could meet after Christmas but the EU's mood, especially in France, Belgium and the Netherlands, has hardened this week. The uncertainty is now becoming worse than the UK crashing out and the EU has other pressing problems such as Poland and Hungary.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,450 ✭✭✭McGiver


    Infini wrote:
    For me I'd rather see a no deal not because I hate the British people themselves but because I despise the conservative party and their leader's who have deliberately and intentionally led a campaign of lies, deceit and gaslighting bullshít since 2016. They spout on about "Sovereignty" but only when it applies to themselves they don't care that they're happy to walk over the COLLECTIVE SOVEREIGNTY of other's demanding economic damage on them if they don't get their own way even though this would pulverize them the worst.
    They lead the campaign since Maastricht, early 90s.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,966 ✭✭✭trellheim


    EU could meet after Christmas but the EU's mood, especially in France, Belgium and the Netherlands, has hardened this week. The uncertainty is now becoming worse than the UK crashing out and the EU has other pressing problems such as Poland and Hungary.

    German twitter sentiment is trending extremely negatively. Unless Council convenes I am not sure what vdL can do but I suppose you do need fallback positions.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,979 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    kowloon wrote: »
    I assume nobody is planning on celebrating the New Year in a conference room.

    You never know at this stage. :confused: Maybe negotiations over Christmas dinner with fish on the menu? Whole thing is such a pantomime and an utter waste of time and effort. Kind of think the EU/member states should give the negotiators a well earned rest and tell the British government that the phone is engaged till next Easter at the earliest.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,381 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty


    trellheim wrote: »
    German twitter sentiment is trending extremely negatively. Unless Council convenes I am not sure what vdL can do but I suppose you do need fallback positions.

    The problem is that quite a few countries believe that Barnier is already yielding too much. VDL has power but that power is subservient to nation states especially core states such as France and they are pissed off at this stage. She can make soothing noises but she can't negotiate unilaterally.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,966 ✭✭✭trellheim


    fly_agaric wrote: »
    You never know at this stage. :confused: Maybe negotiations over Christmas dinner with fish on the menu? Whole thing is such a pantomime and an utter waste of time and effort. Kind of think the EU/member states should give the negotiators a well earned rest and tell the British government that the phone is engaged till next Easter at the earliest.

    Remember this, at last, is finally Brexit and the only negotiation that matters, they threw NI to the EU to get there. For the UK it makes sense to push as hard as possible here all the way to the end. this was always going to happen


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,979 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    trellheim wrote: »
    For the UK it makes sense to push as hard as possible here all the way to the end. this was always going to happen

    Probably right (with this UK government + the way the nutters have taken over). They want the angriest & hardest "Brexit" possible but a fear of being blamed for consequences stopped them just walking away months ago. So the silly games carry on.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,003 ✭✭✭✭Spanish Eyes


    I think there always has to be an out. A compromise or whatever you call it.

    But I don't know how that can be achieved on 1 Jan anymore. But am optimistic just the same, foolish of me maybe. But we shall see.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 92,543 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    breezy1985 wrote: »
    Ya I would see the French as being more likely to to purposefully hold thing up to annoy the UK than wave stuff through.

    I'm sure we can expect a French dockworkers strike any day now too
    I think that would be very unlikely ...






    .. until after the trawlers stop blocking the port protesting against any fishing deal.


    And I'm not sure if the French farmers will take a turn, they used to indulge in hijacking and burning trucks.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,016 ✭✭✭Shelga


    Is the transition period over on January 1st no matter what?

    I really, really hope they don’t do some mini extension til the end of January to ratify a deal. Then another 3 weeks to iron out just a couple more things. Etc etc...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,185 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Shelga wrote: »
    Is the transition period over on January 1st no matter what?

    I really, really hope they don’t do some mini extension til the end of January to ratify a deal. Then another 3 weeks to iron out just a couple more things. Etc etc...

    Yes, in fact. I was reading someone recently saying that trying to extend it at such short notice would be a legal minefield and virtually impossible ; it would need all sorts of agreements and ratifications from the large number of EU stakeholders (highly unlikely to happen).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,304 ✭✭✭Widdensushi


    I think that would be very unlikely ...






    .. until after the trawlers stop blocking the port protesting against any fishing deal.


    And I'm not sure if the French farmers will take a turn, they used to indulge in hijacking and burning trucks.

    The French fishermen will burn the lorries first, they have a record of it, much easier than a blockade.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,799 ✭✭✭✭looksee


    Think i'm calling no deal now. Mood music not good.

    It's not within the EU's, or member states like France', comprehension to accept the UK as a sovereign, independent country free to chart it's own course in the world.

    The demands on fishing and the level playing field go way beyond what any self governing country would be expected to accept.

    That's the simple reality of the situation.

    EU needs to accept the UK is an independent country.

    Kermit, please stay with me and answer this question. You are making points that news media like the Daily Mail offer, I would love if you would explain your thinking.

    You say the EU cannot accept that the UK is an independent country, but it is entirely because it is an independent country, sovereign, not a part of the EU that these requirements are being put forward. If the EU were to offer a deal with no requirements on the UK they would be
    1. patronising the UK (ie not accepting its independence and sovereignty)
    2. seriously annoying all the EU members whose hats are still in the ring and who go along with the rules
    3. upsetting all the other sovereign independent nations who have had to come to agreement with the EU in order to trade with them.

    If the UK does not want to reach an agreement with the EU they are completely free, as a sovereign and independent nation to go and make agreements with other countries. Who will no doubt have similar demands.

    All this is proving is that the EU, while it would be happy to deal with the UK, does not 'need the UK' as much as the UK would like to think it does.

    Please explain your thinking on the subject, it is something that a surprising number of Brexit people do not seem to be able to fully comprehend.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,003 ✭✭✭✭Spanish Eyes


    SNIP. No insults please.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,003 ✭✭✭✭Spanish Eyes


    OK sorry about that reference that everyone knows is Brexit Central.

    So where is the future for us here in Ireland, that is what I wonder about if there is No Deal.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,585 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    OK sorry about that reference that everyone knows is Brexit Central.

    So where is the future for us here in Ireland, that is what I wonder about if there is No Deal.

    Give it a month. We've been waiting for the best part of 5 years now to find out both in the UK and the EU. One more month and then we'll see how much work has been done and whether or not it was worth it.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,081 ✭✭✭theguzman


    The only acceptable way for the Brexiteers is the hardest of Brexit's, Britannia Rules the waves etc. What they are now doing and setting the stage for is to blame the EU for everything once again. The EU have already yielded far too much to them and the next thing we will see is internal EU squabbling over this. The EU cannot afford another Brexit fracture coming from the likes of Italy most likely so they must inflict the most misery on the UK as possible.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,304 ✭✭✭Widdensushi


    ZeroThreat wrote: »
    Literally roasting Les Roast Beefs :D

    It will mean that all irish transport companies feel the need to avoid, unfortunately irish lorries have been burnt before when they were targeting the British.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,003 ✭✭✭✭Spanish Eyes


    Give it a month. We've been waiting for the best part of 5 years now to find out both in the UK and the EU. One more month and then we'll see how much work has been done and whether or not it was worth it.

    Sounds like there will be a Deal so.

    Reminds me of the all nighters that the Unions did here and emerged at the last minute with a deal.

    Gawd help us all this time though.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,016 ✭✭✭Shelga


    It’s 11pm on a Friday night in December and I’m watching Peter bloody Bone on Newsnight, weeks away from economic carnage. 2020 is the worst.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,359 ✭✭✭peter kern


    I think there always has to be an out. A compromise or whatever you call it.

    But I don't know how that can be achieved on 1 Jan anymore. But am optimistic just the same, foolish of me maybe. But we shall see.

    i can not remember many important things in europe that were not decided past deadline at 3 o clock am.
    the thing is france and some others are getting really fed up.
    but still this is how it has always been working. i think at this stage i would still think the odds are higher to find a compromise than not.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,892 ✭✭✭CelticRambler


    peter kern wrote: »
    i can not remember many important things in europe that were not decided past deadline at 3 o clock am.

    Matters concerning equal members, yes ; but deals with third countries are done on the basis of extended negotiations over years, not months, so there's no reason for anyone to stay up till silly-o'clock in the morning. And they don't.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,003 ✭✭✭✭Spanish Eyes


    peter kern wrote: »
    i can not remember many important things in europe that were not decided past deadline at 3 o clock am.
    the thing is france and some others are getting really fed up.
    but still this is how it has always been working. i think at this stage i would still think the odds are higher to find a compromise than not.

    Oh hopefully and it is all Hubris from our nearest neighbours. I live in hope.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 538 ✭✭✭WHL


    After 4 years what have either side conceded that didn’t suit them. EU decided ( only in the last few days) to pay back 15% of fish value (I think). Doesn’t sound like a lot. On the other hand what has the U.K. conceded to the EU in exchange for tariff-free access. Not sure if it is anything in real terms. Kind of wondering what has agreed so far (with 26 days to go) that wasn’t an easy win.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,185 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    OK sorry about that reference that everyone knows is Brexit Central.

    So where is the future for us here in Ireland, that is what I wonder about if there is No Deal.

    Economists think it would be a setback for Ireland but not disastrously so. It would definitely cause job losses and hit exports to a certain degree but nothing remotely on the scale of 2008-09.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,291 ✭✭✭tanko


    Shelga wrote: »
    It’s 11pm on a Friday night in December and I’m watching Peter bloody Bone on Newsnight, weeks away from economic carnage. 2020 is the worst.

    When the BBC are talking to Katya Adler blathering on about whether glasses are half full or half empty and what concessions the EU need to make i see they have a clock counting down the days, hours and minutes to the end of the transition period:rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,185 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    peter kern wrote: »
    i can not remember many important things in europe that were not decided past deadline at 3 o clock am.
    the thing is france and some others are getting really fed up.
    but still this is how it has always been working. i think at this stage i would still think the odds are higher to find a compromise than not.

    It's a fair point but these were all fellow EU members and it was entirely in their interest to reach a compromise.

    The Brexit brigade are a much more hostile bunch and don't even try to hide their dislike of the EU.


  • Registered Users Posts: 285 ✭✭jelem


    Strazdas wrote: »
    Economists think it would be a setback for Ireland but not disastrously so. It would definitely cause job losses and hit exports to a certain degree but nothing remotely on the scale of 2008-09.
    the irish economists are government friendly, take note of that.
    no deal and eu will demand ireland places tarrifs and ireland has
    only one option which is leave eu.
    borris only got elected as he was only one in uk eyes whom will get it done.
    the uk will not give away and will not take any notice of the main arguers france.
    it will be a "hidden eu deal" or no deal as eu is basically france and germany.
    face facts if eu applies tarrifs and causes delay at ports then uk will do same and ireland is sunk.
    recent media showed uk setup for haulage delays "lorry parks etc." what has the irish government done?.
    i would have expected to see announced over rte how wexford and waterford have been rebuilt\organised
    for traffic and more container and transport shipments but only heard some minor words.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,573 ✭✭✭Infini


    jelem wrote: »
    the irish economists are government friendly, take note of that.
    no deal and eu will demand ireland places tarrifs and ireland has
    only one option which is leave eu.
    borris only got elected as he was only one in uk eyes whom will get it done.
    the uk will not give away and will not take any notice of the main arguers france.
    it will be a "hidden eu deal" or no deal as eu is basically france and germany.
    face facts if eu applies tarrifs and causes delay at ports then uk will do same and ireland is sunk.
    recent media showed uk setup for haulage delays "lorry parks etc." what has the irish government done?.
    i would have expected to see announced over rte how wexford and waterford have been rebuilt\organised
    for traffic and more container and transport shipments but only heard some minor words.

    Rubbish and exactly the kind of factless silliness that has the UK on the road to breakup. The UK is replacable to Ireland we have a much larger market on the Continent to build on if they wish to cut off their nose to spite their face in the end.

    Ireland isnt leaving the EU end of story so stop making such baseless and deluded arguments.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,275 ✭✭✭fash


    The demands on fishing and the level playing field go way beyond what any self governing country would be expected to accept.

    That's the simple reality of the situation.

    EU needs to accept the UK is an independent country.
    Oh please - UK's demands are outrageous - give the UK the level of access it wants without methods to ensure they stick to the rules and they renege on bits of the deal at will.
    Give them that access without ratchet clauses and the EU can never again increase environmental protection or worker rights without handing a competitive advantage to UK, which has the stated aim of using any advantage to break up the EU.

    Fish (I heard recently the same size as the UK's door lock and hinge market) is only ever a deliberate emotive topic to get the more gullible Brexiters going: the EU using it to give an obvious concession to the UK to give them a victory to wave to the particularly gullible and not very bright among the Brexiters (of which they are a lot admittedly), the UK to wave around as a pretend reason not to do a deal.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,275 ✭✭✭fash


    peter kern wrote: »
    i can not remember many important things in europe that were not decided past deadline at 3 o clock am.
    Internal matters where there is give and take and horse trading. That doesn't happen with external relations - which the UK now seeks. In reality this is all just part of the UK government's preferred theatrics to sell the deal or no deal to its followers. It is worth considering the economic cost of this strategy on the UK economy in particular (whose interests they nominally represent).


  • Posts: 17,378 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    jelem wrote: »
    the irish economists are government friendly, take note of that.
    no deal and eu will demand ireland places tarrifs and ireland has
    only one option which is leave eu.

    That wouldn't solve the problem at all. It would just reinforce it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,275 ✭✭✭fash


    That wouldn't solve the problem at all. It would just reinforce it.

    While putting Ireland at the tender mercies of the UK Tory government.
    Ask Pat Finucane's wife what that is like.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 538 ✭✭✭WHL


    jelem wrote: »
    recent media showed uk setup for haulage delays "lorry parks etc." what has the irish government done?.
    i would have expected to see announced over rte how wexford and waterford have been rebuilt\organised
    for traffic and more container and transport shipments but only heard some minor words.

    Haven’t we set up more direct links to France so Irish truck drivers can get to the continent without queues and paperwork. Much better option that building lorry parks


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,764 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    I think a deal is very close, but the deal was never going to be agreed by Barnier and Frost. It needs the last minute intervention of Johnson and VdL to look like it was hammered out despite the bureaucrats.

    If Frost agreed a deal it would be known as Frosts deal and immediately you have attacks from MRS decrying it.

    A meeting today where a deal will be hammered out, although already agreed, will give Johnson the appearance of sorting it all out. The narrative that Johnson took the bull by the horns and forced the EU to finally accept UK sovereignty .

    Nothing will actually be changed in the call. Its all optics. And both the EU and UK know that optics only really matter in the UK. EU will play along.

    Much like the WA which was sold as a masterclass by Johnson. Turned out it was nothing of the sort.

    They may even drag it out over a week or so. Giving the impression that the EU needs time to get the countries to agree. VdL will 'do her best and hopefully she can persuade everyone to accept it this deal or the UK walks away ( to where nobody seems to know).

    Cue much grandstanding and merriment in the UK can Brexit has been delivered and UK got one over them over there.

    Meanwhile custom checks, lack of FoM, loss of investment etc etc slowly play out in the UK while the EU support fishermen and Irish farmers and move on to other issued


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,326 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    ^^^
    There is no benefit to the EU to take part in that charade


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,795 ✭✭✭Enzokk


    Leroy42 wrote: »
    I think a deal is very close, but the deal was never going to be agreed by Barnier and Frost. It needs the last minute intervention of Johnson and VdL to look like it was hammered out despite the bureaucrats.

    If Frost agreed a deal it would be known as Frosts deal and immediately you have attacks from MRS decrying it.

    A meeting today where a deal will be hammered out, although already agreed, will give Johnson the appearance of sorting it all out. The narrative that Johnson took the bull by the horns and forced the EU to finally accept UK sovereignty .

    Nothing will actually be changed in the call. Its all optics. And both the EU and UK know that optics only really matter in the UK. EU will play along.

    Much like the WA which was sold as a masterclass by Johnson. Turned out it was nothing of the sort.

    They may even drag it out over a week or so. Giving the impression that the EU needs time to get the countries to agree. VdL will 'do her best and hopefully she can persuade everyone to accept it this deal or the UK walks away ( to where nobody seems to know).

    Cue much grandstanding and merriment in the UK can Brexit has been delivered and UK got one over them over there.

    Meanwhile custom checks, lack of FoM, loss of investment etc etc slowly play out in the UK while the EU support fishermen and Irish farmers and move on to other issued


    I don't know, Barnier has been saying all along that they are far apart on fisheries, LPF and governance and this is still the areas that cannot be agreed. Why carry on with the illusion about being far apart? I mean to go along with the notion that the deal is already agreed but this is all theater, what is in it for the EU? I get the benefit for the UK but the EU gains nothing and if anything you can have countries veto the deal because of this charade.

    Also, this twitter thread spells it out almost exactly as it is happening right now. It was written more than a week ago as well so no captain hindsight here,

    https://twitter.com/DmitryOpines/status/1332385160646504450?s=20

    https://twitter.com/DmitryOpines/status/1332385163259621380?s=20

    https://twitter.com/DmitryOpines/status/1332385165440675841?s=20

    https://twitter.com/DmitryOpines/status/1332385167705567234?s=20

    https://twitter.com/DmitryOpines/status/1332385169962131464?s=20

    I think a deal gets done, because the UK needs one desperately and not any other reason.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,446 ✭✭✭Gerry T


    jelem wrote:
    the irish economists are government friendly, take note of that. no deal and eu will demand ireland places tarrifs and ireland has only one option which is leave eu. borris only got elected as he was only one in uk eyes whom will get it done. the uk will not give away and will not take any notice of the main arguers france. it will be a "hidden eu deal" or no deal as eu is basically france and germany. face facts if eu applies tarrifs and causes delay at ports then uk will do same and ireland is sunk. recent media showed uk setup for haulage delays "lorry parks etc." what has the irish government done?. i would have expected to see announced over rte how wexford and waterford have been rebuilt\organised for traffic and more container and transport shipments but only heard some minor words.
    The EU won't demand anything, IRL are very happy EU members and will apply tariffs etc without any need of EU direction.
    BJ got elected on a bed of lies, still the people (a proportion of) support him blindly, that in its self is baffling but whats worse is the UK media don't call it out.
    Saying the EU is France & Germany is a typical Brexiteer mindset, you don't seem to grasp the concept where the much larger nations will work alongside the smaller ones, together we are all stronger. Is it the empire you long for and blinds you to only see the larger nation controlling the smaller.
    Delays at ports is caused by the UK, the UK is fully aware of how global trade works. By leaving the CU/SM the borders go up and checks start, the UK can only blame itself for that happening to UK shipments to the EU.
    As for what have the Irish done since 2016, well off the top of my head:
    We reduced our exports to the UK from over 20% to about 10%.
    We have 2 of the largest RORO ships in the world now coming to IRL, the mv celien and its sister ship. DFDS has 2 sailings a day now to Dunkirk, Dublin, Cork and Waterford ports have had major works done to allow this to happen. IRL has the capacity to ship direct to/from the mainland 80% of what we need/use and that was before the DFDS routes were announced, using the UK as a landbridge will still be used by some but its redundant.
    With a lot of Govt support, seminars, funding local business have been able to remodel their business, for example in construction most companies have switched from UK suppliers to EU ones, taking out the stg currency risk. I know one developer that has gone direct to window, bathroom pods & granite suppliers in the EU where pre 2016 they would have been told to "talk to the UK rep".
    Now what has the UK done:
    Its kent lorry park won't be ready till march or April because of a failure to get material from UK suppliers.
    The 50,000 customs officials required aren't employed or trained.
    The Japan deal has more restrictive state aide provisions than what the EU are looking for, but the sovereign UK could never agree.
    The IMB is back with Johnson and if he presses ahead with his clauses that breach the GFA and WA then the UK will break international law and will see a much stronger EU and any deal is gone, just like the USA deal will be.
    Patel's new immigration rules is setting the UK crop producers to fail during 2021 picking season, its looking like herself and Johnson have a cunning plan to get the lazy UK off the dole and into the fields, Chairman Mao would be proud, we just need a little blue book.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,764 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    ^^^
    There is no benefit to the EU to take part in that charade

    To get the deal done. I think the EU learnt a valuable lesson dealingvwith TM. A WA was agreed then, but it was torn apart in the UK because they felt the UK had accepted an EU deal.

    So with the actual WA agreement they allowed the optics that Johnson had got the deal done, when in reality nothing really had changed.

    But by playing the game the EU got what it wanted.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,795 ✭✭✭Enzokk


    Leroy42 wrote: »
    To get the deal done. I think the EU learnt a valuable lesson dealingvwith TM. A WA was agreed then, but it was torn apart in the UK because they felt the UK had accepted an EU deal.

    So with the actual WA agreement they allowed the optics that Johnson had got the deal done, when in reality nothing really had changed.

    But by playing the game the EU got what it wanted.


    Still, I also don't see the need for the EU to play this game right now. There are bigger things for the EU and the Covid bailout package will take precedence. This is just a FTA that is being agreed, nothing more or less. Yes the impact is bigger than any other FTA, but this is not the WA which was a FTA and a lot more. By removing the WA from the equation it just isn't that big of a deal for the EU and there is no reason to play silly games to appease the Daily Mail readers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,359 ✭✭✭peter kern


    Matters concerning equal members, yes ; but deals with third countries are done on the basis of extended negotiations over years, not months, so there's no reason for anyone to stay up till silly-o'clock in the morning. And they don't.

    of course the difference is there is a deadline in this negotions. the uk is the 3rd most important trading partner of the eu, and given how much more they are offereing in free movement etc than the current 4th most important trading partner to the eu switzerland, i am pretty sure they will stay up till the last hour. and i guess at the end of the day northern ireland kind of forces them much more to get a deal . So i do not think anybody from eu is going to walk away until they have tried everything , as irleand and germany will make sure they wont.
    my 2 cent


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,799 ✭✭✭✭looksee


    So an awkward but significant player in the golf club decides he doesn't like the committee, and the only solution is to leave the club. He is such a good player that another club - further away, but no problem - will be delighted to take him on.

    The club says ok, see you around.

    The member says, you know, I would be glad to give you my expertise and even the kudos of having me still connected to the club, in exchange for say, using the club house when it suits me, playing the odd round, you know, nothing formal but it would suit us both.

    The committee says, well yes, you've been useful and know the ropes, but of course you wouldn't be able to use the course at weekends, and you would not have members privileges in the clubhouse, but ok, we can maybe work something out with you on visitor status.

    Member says, well I was thinking of something more inclusive, Special Member maybe, with use of all facilities and time slots, but without actually, you know, paying the dues or actual commitment, I was thinking I would be able to play for that club over there when I wish, kind of take my pick of the bits of each club that suits me. I am after all a very important player and you do owe me.

    Club says - you are not as good (or as popular) as you think you are, and on balance we can manage without you rather than create a whole new rule book just for you. Nah, off you go, good luck!


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 92,543 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Infini wrote: »
    Rubbish and exactly the kind of factless silliness that has the UK on the road to breakup. The UK is replacable to Ireland we have a much larger market on the Continent to build on if they wish to cut off their nose to spite their face in the end.
    At independence something like 96% of our exports went to the UK. Now it's 1% to NI and only 7-8% go the rest of the UK.

    A similar % to the tariffs UK exports will face if there isn't a trade deal.

    If the UK exporters are expected to survive tariffs then Irish exporters could be expected to survive the complete disappearance of the UK.

    Except I'd expect it would be easier for Irish exporters to find alternative markets. Because UK exports did NOT increase when Sterling dropped.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 92,543 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    looksee wrote: »
    He is such a good player that another club - further away, but no problem - will be delighted to take him on.
    Except no other club has, except to take their money.

    How many UK trade deals are better than the existing EU deal ? Because that was the whole point of Brexit wasn't it ?

    And remember that if the UK had stayed in the EU it could have influenced those deals. So a deal that is only as good as EU has done since Brexit is as step down behind what they could have had by remaining.


    How many international trade have been done since the start of Brexit that the UK hasn't been able to replicate or join ? Look at the Pacific area.




    And there's the deal with the Faroe Islands.
    After three years (oh the timing) of construction they are opening a new roundabout.

    _115804494_30nov20_75a6676.jpg

    It's in a tunnel under the sea.


    And the UK and Faroe islands are back at the negotiating table over Fishing.
    “The first test for the framework will be the December negotiation where we will be looking for a significant reduction in the Faroese share of the Mackerel catch.”


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,159 ✭✭✭declanflynn


    looksee wrote: »
    So an awkward but significant player in the golf club decides he doesn't like the committee, and the only solution is to leave the club. He is such a good player that another club - further away, but no problem - will be delighted to take him on.

    The club says ok, see you around.

    The member says, you know, I would be glad to give you my expertise and even the kudos of having me still connected to the club, in exchange for say, using the club house when it suits me, playing the odd round, you know, nothing formal but it would suit us both.

    The committee says, well yes, you've been useful and know the ropes, but of course you wouldn't be able to use the course at weekends, and you would not have members privileges in the clubhouse, but ok, we can maybe work something out with you on visitor status.

    Member says, well I was thinking of something more inclusive, Special Member maybe, with use of all facilities and time slots, but without actually, you know, paying the dues or actual commitment, I was thinking I would be able to play for that club over there when I wish, kind of take my pick of the bits of each club that suits me. I am after all a very important player and you do owe me.

    Club says - you are not as good (or as popular) as you think you are, and on balance we can manage without you rather than create a whole new rule book just for you. Nah, off you go, good luck!
    Agree totally
    Well written


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,301 ✭✭✭✭jm08


    Interesting to see the change in Ireland's exports in the last couple of years. US is still Ireland's biggest export market, but Belgium and Germany are 2nd and 3rd. Exports to China have increased by 21.48% to nearly 8 billion and 6.46% of Ireland's total exports.
    https://newsaf.cgtn.com/news/2020-11-18/Ireland-s-exports-to-China-up-nearly-22-percent-in-first-nine-months-Vvchsfy2T6/index.html


    And best of all, Ireland is the world's fastest growing economies and looks set to actually have increased GDP by about 2%. Thank God for tech and pharma which are pandemic proof.
    https://www.irishtimes.com/business/economy/ireland-on-course-to-be-fastest-growing-economy-in-world-in-2020-1.4427464


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,892 ✭✭✭CelticRambler


    peter kern wrote: »
    of course the difference is there is a deadline in this negotions. the uk is the 3rd most important trading partner of the eu, and given how much more they are offereing in free movement etc than the current 4th most important trading partner to the eu switzerland, i am pretty sure they will stay up till the last hour.

    Not sure what you're saying regarding Free Movement, because the Swiss offer way more "free movement" than the UK is happy with ... :confused:

    In any case, the only deadline in this case is the one that affects GB and British citizens. For the EU, life goes on pretty much as before - an internal market of 450m, trade deals with dozens of third countries and other trading blocs, and - most importantly of all - the probability of continuing to export to GB exactly as we have done before, because GB needs what they buy from us and are in no position to apply the checks and tariffs mandated by WTO due to their own failure to effectively plan and prepare.

    The bulk of GB exports to the EU are made up of financial services, which the EU is actively seeking to replicate within the Single Market. In the meantime, now that GB is a third country, any financial services that it offers have the same standing as those offered by Switzerland, the US or Singapore, so Brexit has inadvertently offered us less of a reason to stick with the City.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,795 ✭✭✭Enzokk


    Not sure if this is an update on the talks between Barnier and Frost, or from the phone call,

    https://twitter.com/tconnellyRTE/status/1335248494567755776?s=20

    https://twitter.com/tconnellyRTE/status/1335248497545719808?s=20

    So basically either no-deal if this is from the call between VDL and Johnson or a major climb down from either side to get a deal.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,185 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Enzokk wrote: »
    Not sure if this is an update on the talks between Barnier and Frost, or from the phone call,

    https://twitter.com/tconnellyRTE/status/1335248494567755776?s=20

    https://twitter.com/tconnellyRTE/status/1335248497545719808?s=20

    So basically either no-deal if this is from the call between VDL and Johnson or a major climb down from either side to get a deal.

    I'd guess this is from yesterday's talks (Tony getting the info this afternoon).

    Looks like the only way out of the impasse is a big climb down on all of the above from Johnson (the EU mostly cannot budge).


  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement