Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

2010 Cooking Club Week 48: Pulled Pork

1235717

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 65,710 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    Been looking forward to making this for the past 2 years. Here goes: :)

    Went to butchers last Thursday. Asked the butcher, a man of few words, for shoulder of pork with the bone in. For a slow roast. For pulled pork. The butcher said nothing but went into the back with a big smile on his face. Back he came with a quarter of a pig in his arms, with one leg still completely on it :eek:

    And a huge hacksaw :eek:

    This is what he handed over after a minute or two. Just under 2.5KG, just under €15

    230017.jpg

    Applied the rub - into the fridge for 24h...

    Then yesterday into the slow cooker. On low. For 20 hours :D

    In case anyone is wondering, I have a very large 6.5l slow cooker from Aldi, it was on special a few months ago for €22.99. On low the cooker consumes 142W, so total cost of electricity over 20 hours was about €0.50

    Took it out and the meat just fell off the bone. Easy to pull

    230018.jpg

    After cooling down, back into the slow cooker with the BBQ sauce. Then I had 3 of these

    230019.jpg

    Delicious :D

    We all had some and I brought some to the neighbours. I still have about half left, but it won't last long that's for sure!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    Fecking awesome unkel :D I was wondering how you got it into the slow cooker for a moment there :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,625 ✭✭✭✭BaZmO*


    unkel wrote: »
    Been looking forward to making this for the past 2 years. Here goes: :)

    Went to butchers last Thursday. Asked the butcher, a man of few words, for shoulder of pork with the bone in. For a slow roast. For pulled pork. The butcher said nothing but went into the back with a big smile on his face. Back he came with a quarter of a pig in his arms, with one leg still completely on it :eek:

    And a huge hacksaw :eek:

    This is what he handed over after a minute or two. Just under 2.5KG, just under €15

    230017.jpg

    Applied the rub - into the fridge for 24h...

    Then yesterday into the slow cooker. On low. For 20 hours :D

    In case anyone is wondering, I have a very large 6.5l slow cooker from Aldi, it was on special a few months ago for €22.99. On low the cooker consumes 142W, so total cost of electricity over 20 hours was about €0.50

    Took it out and the meat just fell off the bone. Easy to pull

    230018.jpg

    After cooling down, back into the slow cooker with the BBQ sauce. Then I had 3 of these

    230019.jpg

    Delicious :D

    We all had some and I brought some to the neighbours. I still have about half left, but it won't last long that's for sure!
    Epic!

    This dish is a staple in our house. Best lunch ever!


  • Moderators Posts: 24,367 ✭✭✭✭ChewChew


    Can I ask a question, as the only pork I tend to cook is sausages really, so I'm unsure but... What's the fat content off that cut of pork? It looks fantastic and is something I'd love to cook!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,842 ✭✭✭shinikins


    I used a pork joint I bought in Aldi when I made mine-very little fat on it, and though it might technically have not been the right joint of meat, it was delicious!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 65,710 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    ChewChew wrote: »
    Can I ask a question, as the only pork I tend to cook is sausages really, so I'm unsure but... What's the fat content off that cut of pork? It looks fantastic and is something I'd love to cook!

    I'm not sure about the fat content. As in Sparks OP, I had to cut off a significant layer of fat from one side of my cut of pork even before I put the rub on. I could be wrong but the pulled pork meat didn't look or taste very fatty to me.

    If you are worried about your diet / your food intake, maybe you should worry first about those sausages you cook. Do a bit of research of what goes into them. If you can stomach it, watch some youtube vids. Not nice :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,315 ✭✭✭quazzy


    Hey all,

    I did my version of pulled pork a few weeks back and am wondering what I can use the extra molasses for.

    I'll do pulled pork again but just wondering what else can I do with it.

    I did a quick boards.ie search and found loads of references to feeding it to livestock but ~I'd rather cook something instead ;-)

    Regards,


  • Moderators Posts: 24,367 ✭✭✭✭ChewChew


    shinikins wrote: »
    I used a pork joint I bought in Aldi when I made mine-very little fat on it, and though it might technically have not been the right joint of meat, it was delicious!!!

    Thanks for that shin! I don't know why but I always thought that pork would leave a hefty amount of greasy residue at the bottom of the pot! Must try it so :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    ChewChew wrote: »
    Can I ask a question, as the only pork I tend to cook is sausages really, so I'm unsure but... What's the fat content off that cut of pork? It looks fantastic and is something I'd love to cook!
    Not sure of the actual percentage, but it'll be really rather low; definitely much, much lower than sausages. You start out with a cut that doesn't have much fat because it's a working muscle during the animal's life - it's got lots of connective tisse, and some fat around the outside, but not a lot of marbling; and you cut off most of the fat at the start (not all of it, because it helps the flavour to leave a little on); and you lost any that's left at the end (because it'd just be chewing a mouthful of fat otherwise. The meat itself will be quite lean at the end; the mouth feel and the taste come from gelatin, from the connective tissue breaking down during the braise, not from fat.

    Now, the sauce on the other hand, that's a whole other jar of ingredients. Take a look at the bottle of sauce you're using for more details, but if I was worried about my sugar/salt intake or other dietary problems, that's the place I'd start to look with this recipe.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 65,710 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    Sparks wrote: »
    Now, the sauce on the other hand, that's a whole other jar of ingredients. Take a look at the bottle of sauce you're using for more details

    There's zero fat in HP BBQ sauce :)

    (Coleslaw is fatty though, the one I used (Tesco's) has 28% fat in it)

    Like yourself, I would worry about sugar / salt before I'd worry about fat though...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    unkel wrote: »
    There's zero fat in HP BBQ sauce :)
    Yeah, I've tried that line with Herself Indoors before. She didn't believe it was healthy either :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 65,710 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    After a tip from a chef, I used some of the pulled pork (not in BBQ sauce) in a stir fry.

    Fried up veg in wok on high (chili, garlic, mushroom, carrot, asparagus, spring onion, bamboo shoots), added boiled skinny rice vermicelli noodles, a dash of soy sauce and a good helping of hoi sin sauce. Add the cold meat, stir for a minute and there's a delicious and healthy 15 minute meal :D


  • Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 28,820 Mod ✭✭✭✭oscarBravo


    So I just spent the last hour pulling my pork, and I'm exhausted...


    ...wait, let me rephrase that... :pac:

    My sister's coming home from the UAE for Christmas with a serious craving for the meat of the pig, and I'll be passing by the home place on my way to Colorado, so it seemed only appropriate that I surprise her with some BBQ pork goodness. I've managed not to "taste" too much of it before sticking it in the fridge; making sure there's some left by the time she gets home at the weekend will be quite the test of my willpower!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,614 ✭✭✭The Sparrow


    To add to what everyone else has said, I made this last weekend and it was quality. Made a few slight changes but it was basically this recipe.

    The only difference was that I used a shoulder of pork instead and left the fat on plus I left it in the slow cooker for about 22 hours. The bbq sauce with cider vinegar is amazing though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 65,710 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    I used a shoulder of pork instead and left the fat on

    I was tempted to do this myself. Does anyone know will this improve the taste? I take it removing the fat after slow cooking would be at least as easy as removing it before?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    unkel wrote: »
    I was tempted to do this myself. Does anyone know will this improve the taste?
    Every american chef who's described how to do pulled pork has said that using the shoulder with the bone in and the fat on will give a better result (but they're also using barbecue pits which we don't have here and have you ever seen a whole boston butt? They're not small cuts of meat, especially with the bone in!)

    The thing is, if you're doing this in the slow cooker, your braising liquid never evaporates away (unless you have some Hells Angels slow cooker that can evaporate the insides of a mouse at forty yards). The point of the fat in the barbecue pit is to act as a basting liquid (that's why the fat cap is placed upwards in the pit, so as the fat renders out it runs down into the meat) and so the meat never dries out and you get a long slow braise in the pit.

    You just don't need it in the slow cooker (but need and want are different things :D )
    I take it removing the fat after slow cooking would be at least as easy as removing it before?
    Should be a lot easier, physically; but might well be a damn sight messier as well, and that's assuming it hasn't just rendered down and dispersed throughout the meat fibres, in which case you're not getting it out without a bit of work!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    Mind you, if you've got a Green Egg or something similar, ditch the slow cooker, get the whole butt and smoke it, it'll be amazing :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 65,710 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    Cheers for the insight, Sparks!

    And funny you mention this:
    Sparks wrote: »
    have you ever seen a whole boston butt? They're not small cuts of meat, especially with the bone in!

    The chef I referred to earlier who gave me the tip of using pulled pork leftovers in stir fries, insisted that instead of shoulder of pork with the bone in (that I used), I should use pork butt

    I don't even know what that is, or how big it is. I'm entertaining the extended family on Christmas Eve and it was suggested I'd do the pulled pork. Perhaps I should consult my local butcher again - he kinda won my respect the last time when he produced the quarter pig and the hacksaw with few words :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    unkel wrote: »
    The chef ... insisted that instead of shoulder of pork with the bone in (that I used), I should use pork butt
    Er. I don't quite know what he's on about - the "butt" is the shoulder (nobody seems to know exactly where the name came from, but the best guess is that they used to brine pork to preserve it before refrigeration, and you brined them in large barrels, which were called butts back then).

    Maybe he thinks of the butt as a larger or smaller subset of the pig that includes the shoulder?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,401 ✭✭✭Nonoperational


    Fantastic thread, only came across it now. Going to try this at the weekend.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 65,710 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    Intriguing :)

    The chef is from South Africa - I don't know if that has any impact on what part of the pig we are referring to :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,614 ✭✭✭The Sparrow


    unkel wrote: »
    I was tempted to do this myself. Does anyone know will this improve the taste? I take it removing the fat after slow cooking would be at least as easy as removing it before?

    It's actually even easier. You can just pull it straight off with you hand as if you are peeling an onion. It came straight off for me in one go.

    TBH I think you're right, you probably don't need it. But because I was going to leave it on for a whole day, I was afraid that the liquid would evaporate and I wanted the layer of fat to keep it moist. But actually it didn't evaporate at all.

    Next time I might take it off because it seemed a shame to throw the fat away when I could have fried it to make crackling.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 142 ✭✭emaleth


    It's actually even easier. You can just pull it straight off with you hand as if you are peeling an onion. It came straight off for me in one go.

    TBH I think you're right, you probably don't need it. But because I was going to leave it on for a whole day, I was afraid that the liquid would evaporate and I wanted the layer of fat to keep it moist. But actually it didn't evaporate at all.

    Next time I might take it off because it seemed a shame to throw the fat away when I could have fried it to make crackling.

    I've done it both ways and there was no difference in taste. I'd always remove the fat when using my slow cooker because as a braise it's going to be moist enough no matter what. My butcher sells me a shoulder for €7.99, skins it and will take it off the bone if I want. If I do have it off the bone (usually only because the shoulder is too big to fit into my giant slow cooker while still on the bone) then I take the bone home with me and use it as a trivet in the liquid.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 65,710 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    Sparks wrote: »
    Er. I don't quite know what he's on about - the "butt" is the shoulder

    Maybe he thinks of the butt as a larger or smaller subset of the pig that includes the shoulder?

    Yep, a bit of googling gives this:

    A full shoulder can weigh 8 to 20 pounds and has two halves, the "picnic ham" and the "Boston butt". The picnic ham, which is not really a ham, runs from the shoulder socket through to the elbow. True hams come from the rear legs only. The picnic usually weighs from 4 to 12 pounds.

    The top half of the shoulder, from the the dorsal of the animal near the spine through the shoulder blade, has too many names: Boston butt, pork butt, butt, shoulder butt, shoulder roast, country roast, and the shoulder blade roast. Calling it a butt may seem ironic because it comes from the front of the hog. No ifs ands or butts, it makes the best sandwich meat on the hog.


    That's exactly the bit I got last time. And again today (another 2.5KG) for feeding the extended family on Christmas Eve :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 65,710 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    Forgot to say, the butcher recommended adding some Jack Daniels to the cooking liquid. I think I have a few measures left sitting in a bottle here for a few years. Who am I not to give that a go? :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    Damn good idea. JD's a pretty good pick for a BBQ dish, but if you don't have any, any spirit would do - the ethanol will mostly evaporate way (well, about 95-97% of it will, according to the experts), but before it goes, it'll act as a solvent for some compounds that aren't water soluble and you'll get a tastier end result (especially if you use the braising liquid to make a sauce).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,921 ✭✭✭✭hdowney


    So Santa procured me a slow cooker for Christmas. I CANNOT WAIT to do this :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 65,710 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    Go for it! :D

    Made it again on Christmas Eve for the extended family. With JD this time. Also left all the fat in until after the cooking. I can't say it tasted of JD, but it was definitely nicer and smoother than the first time :)

    Had a stir fry tonight with the leftovers. Easy, cheap, healthy and quick :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    Glad to hear it worked unkel, though I don't think I'd leave the fat in - I've a bit too much on the midriff to be doing that :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 65,710 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    Sparks wrote: »
    I don't think I'd leave the fat in - I've a bit too much on the midriff to be doing that :D

    Ah no, I threw all the fat out after the cooking :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    Ah, I see - well, nothing wrong with that *ahem* :D It's how you're meant to do it when you cook this dish in a proper barbecue pit...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 65,710 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    That maybe because fat burns easily on a BBQ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    unkel wrote: »
    That maybe because fat burns easily on a BBQ?
    I wouldn't have thought anything burnt in a BBQ pit - but I'm talking about actual barbecue, ie. this:

    reverse%2Bflow%2Bdiagram.png

    where the indirect heat is carried by smoke, rather than what we're more familiar with, where the food is basicly supported over very direct heat:

    0.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 65,710 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    Aye. As you say in your OP "In Ireland, we don’t do Barbecue.". That would include me. I haven't a clue about proper BBQing :D


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 23,931 Mod ✭✭✭✭TICKLE_ME_ELMO


    I've spent the last hour reading through this thread and now there's no way I can't try this!

    Few questions though.... are slow cookers versatile in what you can make? I don't want to go buying one just to make one dish and have it sitting gathering dust. Also, very tiny kitchen we have, have to justify every new purchase in relation to how much space it will take up :)

    Also, do you have to reheat the leftovers to use again? Like if I make it for dinner but there's loads left over and I want to take some for lunch the next day is it okay to eat it cold, or will it taste greasier?

    Oh, and just on the line of BBQ vs Grill - I saw on The Fabulous Baker Brothers on Channel 4 where they were hot smoking some salmon and they got little bags of flavoured/scented wood chips off the internet and threw them onto the hot coals under the rack and covered it with a steel lid and it smoked away fine and it was the smoke that cooked the fish, not the coals. Seems like sort of in between a proper BBQ and the ones we actually have.


  • Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 28,820 Mod ✭✭✭✭oscarBravo


    Few questions though.... are slow cookers versatile in what you can make?
    We just bought one here in the US ($16 in Walmart) to cook beef cheeks. It came with a little recipe booklet that contains something like 30 recipes, and I saw a book in the books section of Walmart (called something like "not your mother's slow cooker cookbook") that looked to be a few hundred pages.

    They're pretty versatile; you can even (apparently) roast a whole chicken in one.
    Also, do you have to reheat the leftovers to use again? Like if I make it for dinner but there's loads left over and I want to take some for lunch the next day is it okay to eat it cold, or will it taste greasier?
    I'd heat it, just because it's sooo much nicer hot.


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 23,931 Mod ✭✭✭✭TICKLE_ME_ELMO


    oscarBravo wrote: »
    We just bought one here in the US ($16 in Walmart) to cook beef cheeks. It came with a little recipe booklet that contains something like 30 recipes, and I saw a book in the books section of Walmart (called something like "not your mother's slow cooker cookbook") that looked to be a few hundred pages.

    Yes, now you mention it I think I've seen slow cooker cook books too. Never paid any attention to them as we don't have one. I'll go browse some online bookshops to see what there is.
    I'd heat it, just because it's sooo much nicer hot.

    It's not always possible to reheat it at lunch time though depending on where I am, just wondered if it was edible cold or if it's completely disgusting?


  • Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 28,820 Mod ✭✭✭✭oscarBravo


    I remember sampling some from the fridge, just to, er, make sure it was still OK, and I thought it was still lovely.


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 23,931 Mod ✭✭✭✭TICKLE_ME_ELMO


    oscarBravo wrote: »
    I remember sampling some from the fridge, just to, er, make sure it was still OK, and I thought it was still lovely.

    Good to know, just didn't want any of it going to waste. :D

    Oh and one last thing, just out of interest, the OP is very specific about not using Pepsi. Is there a scientific reason for that, or is it just a personal taste thing? I know a lot of people have weirdly strong feelings about Pepsi v Coke.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,921 ✭✭✭✭hdowney


    I think Pepsi would change the taste of it - different ingredients in Pepsi to Coke and I am pretty sure their sugar contents are different etc (could be wrong) - and that'd annoy me. But I am sure Sparks will tell you why.

    I swear this is so going to be the first thing I make in the slow cooker. I am going into my butcher tomorrow to get my beef for New Years Day, I am going to ask him about the shoulder of pork :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,625 ✭✭✭✭BaZmO*


    hdowney wrote: »
    I think Pepsi would change the taste of it - different ingredients in Pepsi to Coke and I am pretty sure their sugar contents are different etc (could be wrong) - and that'd annoy me. But I am sure Sparks will tell you why.

    I swear this is so going to be the first thing I make in the slow cooker. I am going into my butcher tomorrow to get my beef for New Years Day, I am going to ask him about the shoulder of pork :)
    I doubt using Pepsi would make any difference to the taste, there are so many spices in the recipe so that'd cover up any differences.

    I always have it cold during the week for lunches and its just as nice. I also find that heating it too much or for too long reduces the vinegar kick.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    I've spent the last hour reading through this thread and now there's no way I can't try this!
    Yup :D And after you make it, there's no way you can't make it again :D
    Few questions though.... are slow cookers versatile in what you can make?
    The original application was cooking beans, so this recipe alone shows how far they can stretch :D
    But right off the top of my head without opening the slow cooker recipe book on my shelf, I know they can do stews, soups, braises, sauces, lasagnes, and pretty much every long&slow cooking process I can think of bar pizza.
    Yeah, they're pretty versatile.
    Also, do you have to reheat the leftovers to use again? Like if I make it for dinner but there's loads left over and I want to take some for lunch the next day is it okay to eat it cold, or will it taste greasier?
    I've never tried it cold, but I just stick it in the microwave for a few seconds to reheat, it's not like it's like reheating a roast. BTW, if you have leftover pulled pork, what you actually have is an ingredient for kickass pizzas, really nice ramen, darn good stirfrys, and a few other dishes...
    Oh, and just on the line of BBQ vs Grill - I saw on The Fabulous Baker Brothers on Channel 4 where they were hot smoking some salmon and they got little bags of flavoured/scented wood chips off the internet and threw them onto the hot coals under the rack and covered it with a steel lid and it smoked away fine and it was the smoke that cooked the fish, not the coals. Seems like sort of in between a proper BBQ and the ones we actually have.

    Yeah, it's a kludge to get from a direct flame grill to a proper smoker; but so long as the food and the fire are in the same box, you're always going to risk drying out the food or giving it too much heat.

    Still though, if I ever find a source of liquid smoke in Ireland, I think I could get by without a several-hundred-euro smoker :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    Oh and one last thing, just out of interest, the OP is very specific about not using Pepsi. Is there a scientific reason for that, or is it just a personal taste thing? I know a lot of people have weirdly strong feelings about Pepsi v Coke.
    Different tastes to the two; Coke is more acidic to my tastebuds so I use that for cooking. But I prefer diet pepsi to drink, of all things (I've tried pretty much all the cola's out there and that's the one I'd prefer over all the others; but you put me near a pint of iced ginger ale and you can pour all of them down the sink really :D )

    (btw, I did try it with pepsi once; and you can tell the difference. Also, don't use diet anything in this dish, it needs the sugar in the full-fat versions)


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 23,931 Mod ✭✭✭✭TICKLE_ME_ELMO


    Sparks wrote: »
    Different tastes to the two; Coke is more acidic to my tastebuds so I use that for cooking. But I prefer diet pepsi to drink, of all things (I've tried pretty much all the cola's out there and that's the one I'd prefer over all the others; but you put me near a pint of iced ginger ale and you can pour all of them down the sink really :D )

    (btw, I did try it with pepsi once; and you can tell the difference. Also, don't use diet anything in this dish, it needs the sugar in the full-fat versions)

    Makes sense, there is a clear difference between the two to taste so it stands to reason they'd impart a different taste in a recipe. I prefer Pepsi myself (although I rarely drink fizzy drinks) but I'll stick with the Coke for this one.

    Thanks Sparks, bet you didn't think you'd still be answering questions about his one two years later ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    Thanks Sparks, bet you didn't think you'd still be answering questions about his one two years later ;)
    Nope, but I like it -- it's a real kick to know my recipe's been tried by so many and liked :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,070 ✭✭✭purple hands


    Right, step one completed tonight! Can anyone tell me when I should lob the pork in the slow cooker on Friday if I'm aiming to have this ready for lunchtime Sat? Thanks!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 65,710 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    20 hours on low is working well for me! (That's for a very large 2.5KG shoulder with the bone in)


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,070 ✭✭✭purple hands


    unkel wrote: »
    20 hours on low is working well for me! (That's for a very large 2.5KG shoulder with the bone in)

    Cool thanks.

    Oh should mention, Tesco (Jervis anyways) have shoulders half price at the moment. Though there is a solid chubb/roll of stuffing in the middle, but this can be removed once the twine is off. The meat itself didn't seem to have picked up any aroma from it.

    Will see how it tastes on Saturday anyways!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,315 ✭✭✭quazzy


    I just got myself a slow cooker from argos (the 3.5 litre one - its only 15.59 at the moment) so I'll be trying this for my second time soon. First time was in a cast iron casserole pot in the oven.

    Hopefully the slow cooker will give me improved results.

    Was also contemplating using Dr Pepper instead of coke in the cooking liquid.

    I'll post back when I'm done.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,315 ✭✭✭quazzy


    Pulled Pork the sequel was just as good as as my first effort. It was made a hell of a lot easier because of the slow cooker - highly recommend getting one if you want to do this more than once.

    I used the shoulder of pork from Tesco - someone mentioned it earlier in this thread. It came with a role of stuffing in the middle but it was simple to remove.

    Stuck with Coke for the cooking liquid so no changes in the recipe this time. I'll try it for the next one.

    FYI - I cooked the pork on high for about 9 hours and the pork was amazing.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement