Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Las Vegas Raiders Thread

1141517192028

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,364 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    Popcorn sales will increase this off season.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,364 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    Popcorn sales will increase this off season.


  • Registered Users Posts: 620 ✭✭✭Kev8360


    Of all the things I expected us to make headlines for this offseason Antonio Browns helmet is the last thing I expected to see.

    No way the nfl backs down.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,364 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    Kev8360 wrote: »
    Of all the things I expected us to make headlines for this offseason Antonio Browns helmet is the last thing I expected to see.

    No way the nfl backs down.
    Of course there's no way the NFL will back down, and it's because of the fact that it's also the NFLPA that have agreed to this change. I saw a clip from GMFB today and there are over 2,000 players in the league and the number of players kicking up a fuss over this is a grand total of one. The more that comes out about this change the worse Antonio Brown looks. There are nearly thirty different types of helmet to which both the NFL and NFLPA will allow to be used this season. Also, this has been known for five years and they gave some players an extra year with their old helmets. That has ended and Antonio brown can jump up and down and cry foul all he wants. The league and the union are for once on the same page over something that will help AB but the guy seems a complete head melt.


  • Registered Users Posts: 620 ✭✭✭Kev8360


    Itssoeasy wrote: »
    ... but the guy seems a complete head melt.

    yep agreed


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 442 ✭✭SexBobomb


    Gruden came out saying he's going to support AB Is that support with this stupid helmet issue and him freezing his own feet off basically ? I dont know, maybe. He hasn't played a snap and he's already an issue, cant be good for the "new team culture" their supposedly trying to create, which was a big reason they say they took Clelin Ferrell. Mack getting lauded as a real leader over in Chicago then :rolleyes:

    Hope Im wrong but Im after moving from excited to super sceptical on AB


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,030 ✭✭✭heyjude


    With the third pre-season game being played tonight, Gruden and Co are looking at intense rivalries in a number of positions as players compete for a place in the final 53 man roster.

    Unfortunately, its not a level playing field as several players look set to make the final roster without featuring in the pre-season games so far (being unlikely to feature tonight either) and despite a strong challenge for their position from other players.

    So here's a look at some of the position battles

    FB - Keith Smith faces a strong challenge from undrafted rookie Alec Ingold, for while Smith has been recovering from a knee injury, Ingold has impressed both as a blocker and pass receiver, while during his college days he proved very capable as a goal line short yardage runner. I'd go with Ingold, as I don't see him clearing waivers and making it to the practice squad, and Smith hasn't been that impressive, but Smith seems to be a Gruden favourite, so who knows ?

    HB - First round Josh Jacobs and third down back Jalen Richard seem to be locks, which leaves Washington and Martin possibly competing for one spot. Washington has more upside, but Martin did a good job last year and could get Grudens' vote. If they opt to carry 4 running backs, then both could make it.

    TE - Waller is the starter and draftee Moreau seems to be favoured to claim a spot too, which leaves Paul Butler, Luke Wilson and Derek Carrier competing for 1 or at most 2 spots. Wilson has most NFL experience and that may be decisive.

    WR - Antonio Brown and Tyrell Williams are certs to make the roster, I think rookie Hunter Renfro is also a cert and could start as their slot receiver(even though Gruden likes to move his receivers around). After that it depends on how many receivers they decide to carry, Ryan Grant should get in too and if they decide to keep a specialist kick/punt returner then Dwayne Harris could fill that role. I'm assuming they may carry 6 receivers so that leaves JJ Nelson, Keelan Doss, Marcus Ateman, Rico Gafford, Keon Hatcher and De'Mornay Pierson El competing for 1 spot. I think its between Nelson and Doss, with the 2 final pre-season games possibly providing the tiebreaker.

    OL - Miller, Hudson, Jackson and Trent Brown are certs to make the 53. Incognito is suspended for the first 2 games and so doesn't count towards the final roster, while Jackson injured his MCL and may end up on injured reserve. Sharpe, Parker, Devey, Kirkland, Hunt, Cooper and Good are all vying for the other spots with nobody ruled out or ruled in at this stage. I wouldn't like to have to pick, but god help Carr if Brandon Parker sees prolonged game time.

    DT - It seems as though Hankins and Hurst are certs for the 53, Justin Ellis looked that way too, but the situation has got more competitive, with PJ Hall, Ethan Westbrooks, Gabe Wright, Eddie Vanderdoes and rookie Anthony Rush all in the mix. It all depends on how many DTs they decide to keep, but I think Vanderdoes could be gone along with Gabe Wright, while they could try to stash Rush on the practice squad if he clears waivers. I think that leaves Hall, Westbrooks and Ellis competing for just 2 spots. I'd go with Hall and Westbrooks, as Hall is only going into his second year after injuries slowed him last year and so deserves another chance, while Westbrooks offers experience and more pass rush ability.

    DB - Conley, Worley, Joyner(who is listed as slot corner/safety) and rookie Treyvon Mullen look to be locks, leaving Nick Nelson, Isaiah Johnson, Nevin Lawson and rookie Keasean Nixon as likely contenders for the remaining spots. Johnson is currently out through concussion and Lawson will miss the first four games through suspension, so Nick Nelson can secure his spot with a strong showing tonight and next week, though Nixon will press him and may end up on the practice squad.

    The roster looks pretty set at QB, DE, LB, Safety and at the other special team positions


  • Registered Users Posts: 620 ✭✭✭Kev8360


    ^feel like I got more of a feel about the roster battles in this post than 3 1/2 hours of Hard Knocks so far.... all I know from that is John Gruden loves to knock on wood!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 442 ✭✭SexBobomb


    Was actually surprised Doss got released, just from all the screen time he got on HK. I was rooting for him, still have Josh Jacobs to look forward to seeing though, got him in my fantasy Draft as well.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,047 ✭✭✭Ohmeha


    SexBobomb wrote: »
    Was actually surprised Doss got released, just from all the screen time he got on HK.
    That's exactly why I wasn't surprised, nearly every undrafted rookie over the years on Hard Knocks that has got tonnes of screen-time and love from their coaches has got cut. Doss has signed for Jacksonville's practice squad so good for him


  • Registered Users Posts: 620 ✭✭✭Kev8360


    Well looks like AB will be suspended by the Raiders after his reaction to getting fined. T.O and Randy Moss combined aren’t as big a diva as that lad.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,364 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    I think the reason why the AB issue has blown up this off season is because as much as I love the raiders as a franchise in the NFL and when they are good the league is better for it. I don’t believe they are set up to handle an issue like AB like a team like the steelers who run a tight ship. The crap may have hit the fan regardless but I don’t think we’d have AB saying he’d hit the GM of the Steelers.


  • Registered Users Posts: 620 ✭✭✭Kev8360


    I think the right call was made to release Antonio Brown - it was really the only option after all that went down last week. I just don’t know what end he has in mind with all this crap. I am sure someone will pick him up as he has loads of talent and someone will be desperate enough to ignore the issues but it will be hard to see him finding a long term home now. Onwards and upwards


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,718 ✭✭✭golfball37


    The AB thing stinks to high heaven. He’d never any intention of wearing the silver and black imo.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,030 ✭✭✭heyjude


    I agree, I don't think he ever had any intention of playing for the Raiders either. The conspiracy theorists will have a field day with the idea that Antonio always wanted to play for the Patriots, but he knew that the Steelers would never trade him to New England, so he heads off to Oakland, pushes and prods them until they finally had to react and then he asks to be released, after which, within hours, he's a Patriot.

    Some of the anti-Raider bias among some pundits was really shown up by this. I saw one TV pundit who(after the announcement that Brown had been cut, but before he signed with New England) criticised the Raiders, saying that they should have known what Brown was like, given how desperate the Steelers were to offload him and that this is what happens when you sign other peoples' problems. Yet the decision of the Patriots to sign the same player(after further issues), seems to have been given the universal thumbs up.

    Williams now goes into the season as the Raiders No 1 receiver, but the real beneficiary could be TE Darren Waller, whose targets will jump massively and who could turn into a real star(and a really useful fantasy signing). What are the odds now that the Raiders use one of their first round picks new year on a wide receiver ?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,030 ✭✭✭heyjude


    Second season in a row that the Raiders go into their week one game having just lost their best player. Last year, they traded Mack just before week one and this year they lose Brown.

    Its hard to make real progress in moving the team forward when this happens, even if the two players left for completely different reasons.


  • Registered Users Posts: 620 ✭✭✭Kev8360


    Agreed it must be very disruptive on the squad to see this going on - lot of rookies in the 53 as well so makes it doubly hard on the veterans to hold it all together.

    Keelan Doss is back from Jacksonville practice squad to add another body at WR - hope he gets some real game time after all the positive vibes from hard knocks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,963 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    You look like you may have fixed your offensive line which imo was crucial. While you don't have Brown you do have a QB who I think will do great things once he is protected.



    I think Tyrell Williams could be a really good wide receiver, he showed plenty in his time with the Chargers and he was splitting targets with a lot of receivers there. Renfrow in the slot looks like he could be really special, your third spot isn't so promising but then again JJ Nelson didn't ever play with a good QB.

    The X factor in that offense could be Darren Waller, if he can come close to replicating what you got from Jared Cook then you will be in good shape imo. This is all of course if that OL does it's job.


  • Registered Users Posts: 830 ✭✭✭Prefab Sprouter


    Well that was a very satisfying win! The O-Line was in good shape last night and the Defense seemed hungry for it. I'm not expecting anything from next week but just to see us play well was gratifying!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,773 ✭✭✭eire4


    Well that was a very satisfying win! The O-Line was in good shape last night and the Defense seemed hungry for it. I'm not expecting anything from next week but just to see us play well was gratifying!!

    Definitely much better then expected. The defense was very good which considering how bad the Raiders D was last season is vital if there is to be any chance of having a winning season. On offense the line was brilliant. Carr was not touched all night and Williams and Jacobs had brilliant debuts. As good as the improvements were on both sides of the ball it will be back down to earth next weekend with Kansas City likely to be simply too much for the Raiders right now but it will be interesting to see if the Raiders can be competitive in the game or will it be a stroll for Kansas City. That will tell a lot about what to expect the rest of the way I think.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,030 ✭✭✭heyjude


    The offensive line played really well and given that it featured backups at both guard positions, it bodes well for the season with pro-bowl guards Gabe Jackson and Richie Incognito still to return. They won't face many better pass rush pairings than Miller and Chubb. Glad to see that Waller and Williams had good games too.

    The rookies were making plays all over the place, on both sides of the ball and will surely get even better as the season progresses and they gain experience. I hope Conleys' injury isn't too serious or Mullen will be heavily tested by the Chiefs next week.

    My only quibble about the game, is the tendency of Grudens' teams to take their foot off the gas when they get a lead. They had a good lead at the half and then got tentative, which allowed Denver to creep back into the game. They need to be more aggressive when leading, you don't see the top teams backing off when they get on top. The defence has far more young players than the offence, so if the offence gets cautious and has more 3 and outs, it puts the defence in a spot.

    To have a chance next week they can't be scared to take chances against the Chiefs and with Jacobs playing so well, play action passes could reap rewards


  • Registered Users Posts: 830 ✭✭✭Prefab Sprouter


    I'd also say that its disappointing to see Abrams injury is season long. I was hoping that he would be a cornerstone of the Secondary but thats now for next season. And whilst I'm delighted by the O-line's play, I'm very conscious that its a Tom Cable led line and thats always a cause for worry :). But like eire4 said, it will be interesting to see how we play against the Chiefs. I'd be happy if we were still competitive in the game going into the 4th quarter. I'm looking more at how we play as opposed to the result.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,773 ✭✭✭eire4


    heyjude wrote: »
    The offensive line played really well and given that it featured backups at both guard positions, it bodes well for the season with pro-bowl guards Gabe Jackson and Richie Incognito still to return. They won't face many better pass rush pairings than Miller and Chubb. Glad to see that Waller and Williams had good games too.

    The rookies were making plays all over the place, on both sides of the ball and will surely get even better as the season progresses and they gain experience. I hope Conleys' injury isn't too serious or Mullen will be heavily tested by the Chiefs next week.

    My only quibble about the game, is the tendency of Grudens' teams to take their foot off the gas when they get a lead. They had a good lead at the half and then got tentative, which allowed Denver to creep back into the game. They need to be more aggressive when leading, you don't see the top teams backing off when they get on top. The defence has far more young players than the offence, so if the offence gets cautious and has more 3 and outs, it puts the defence in a spot.

    To have a chance next week they can't be scared to take chances against the Chiefs and with Jacobs playing so well, play action passes could reap rewards

    Reports are that Conley's injury is not as serious as it looked during the game and he might even play on Sunday.


  • Registered Users Posts: 830 ✭✭✭Prefab Sprouter


    Ouch. That didnt end well.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,773 ✭✭✭eire4


    No it sure didn't but in fairness Kansas City along with the Patriots are probably head and shoulders the best teams in the AFC maybe even in the whole NFL. I never expected anything other then a Chiefs win but disappointing the Raiders could not get closer to the Chiefs. I think next week in Minnesota against a decent Vikings team will be very telling in terms of will this be another long losing season or are the Raiders at least going to be a competitive team this season.


  • Registered Users Posts: 830 ✭✭✭Prefab Sprouter


    eire4 wrote: »
    No it sure didn't but in fairness Kansas City along with the Patriots are probably head and shoulders the best teams in the AFC maybe even in the whole NFL. I never expected anything other then a Chiefs win but disappointing the Raiders could not get closer to the Chiefs. I think next week in Minnesota against a decent Vikings team will be very telling in terms of will this be another long losing season or are the Raiders at least going to be a competitive team this season.
    Agreed. The Vikings have a Boom or bust passing game. Chris Simms made the point tonight on the NBC Football talk that Minnesota either use the Screen pass or the 40 yard "Hail Mary". The meat and potatoes 10-15 yards passing game is absent with them. I hope that we can shape up against them. The Running Defense needs to be on point. And the Offense needs to click. Big Time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,718 ✭✭✭golfball37


    Agreed. The Vikings have a Boom or bust passing game. Chris Simms made the point tonight on the NBC Football talk that Minnesota either use the Screen pass or the 40 yard "Hail Mary". The meat and potatoes 10-15 yards passing game is absent with them. I hope that we can shape up against them. The Running Defense needs to be on point. And the Offense needs to click. Big Time.

    They have potentially the best RB in the game right now though also, so won't need to air it out. If we pack the box with our big guys and make Cousins throw we can restrict them on offence, I am pretty confident.

    Do I think we have enough on offense to score more than them- no sadly.


  • Registered Users Posts: 620 ✭✭✭Kev8360


    golfball37 wrote: »
    They have potentially the best RB in the game right now though also, so won't need to air it out. If we pack the box with our big guys and make Cousins throw we can restrict them on offence, I am pretty confident.

    Do I think we have enough on offense to score more than them- no sadly.

    Well called - offense just couldn't get going and defense had a tough day against the run. This is going to be a tough stretch. Next game with any chance of a win is probably at home to the lions in Wk8 and even that will be tough - they played really well to win away to a banged up Eagles team.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,773 ✭✭✭eire4


    Kev8360 wrote: »
    Well called - offense just couldn't get going and defense had a tough day against the run. This is going to be a tough stretch. Next game with any chance of a win is probably at home to the lions in Wk8 and even that will be tough - they played really well to win away to a banged up Eagles team.

    Well I still say that the overall team is better then last season and I stand by that but this weekend clearly showed the improvement is only of small margins and with a really tough schedule another heavy losing season looms large now. The improvements have come with a solid draft and the significant lowering of the age of the team so some hope for the future yes but not much immediate hope for this season. Easily likely to be another 4-12 effort and maybe even worse. Another season now spent focused on how high a top 5 draft pick the Raiders will get rather then trying to actually be competitive never mind even challenge.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,773 ✭✭✭eire4


    With the above in mind I will post the early NFL tankathon league standings after week 3. Currently the Raiders in 10th and don't forget the Raiders also have Chicago's first round pick for next season as well currently that is 20tth.

    http://www.tankathon.com/nfl


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 620 ✭✭✭Kev8360


    eire4 wrote: »
    Well I still say that the overall team is better then last season and I stand by that but this weekend clearly showed the improvement is only of small margins and with a really tough schedule another heavy losing season looms large now. The improvements have come with a solid draft and the significant lowering of the age of the team so some hope for the future yes but not much immediate hope for this season. Easily likely to be another 4-12 effort and maybe even worse. Another season now spent focused on how high a top 5 draft pick the Raiders will get rather then trying to actually be competitive never mind even challenge.


    Yes I do believe the defense is better than last year - at least they are getting pressure on the QB (vs the broncos and for 3 quarters vs the chiefs). its a little early to tell with the offense - Jacobs is an improvement for sure but the o-line and WRs need time to gel and injuries definitely had a impact last weekend as williams was not 100% with his hip.

    What will be interesting to see is if we go for a QB early in the draft next year - still not sold that Gruden thinks Carr will be the franchise QB going forward.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,773 ✭✭✭eire4


    Kev8360 wrote: »
    Yes I do believe the defense is better than last year - at least they are getting pressure on the QB (vs the broncos and for 3 quarters vs the chiefs). its a little early to tell with the offense - Jacobs is an improvement for sure but the o-line and WRs need time to gel and injuries definitely had a impact last weekend as williams was not 100% with his hip.

    What will be interesting to see is if we go for a QB early in the draft next year - still not sold that Gruden thinks Carr will be the franchise QB going forward.

    The QB issue does seem to be coming up a lot but for me Carr is far from the biggest issue for the Raiders. He is no top tier QB yes for sure but he is overall a decent QB who mostly has put up good numbers and certainly did last season which was impressive considering how poor the cast he had on offense to play with last season was. This season Jacobs is without a doubt an upgrade on offense and Williams is a good WR but again he really does not have in any way a potent group around him to play with so for me QB is not where I would be going with either of the 2 first round draft picks next spring. The only way I would consider going for a new QB would be if some team got desperate later this season and offered a first round pick for Carr in a trade. But for me the issues the Raiders have are still so many on both sides of the ball that QB is far from the top of the list for me.


  • Registered Users Posts: 620 ✭✭✭Kev8360


    Good to win one on the road - even if it was to a team with some key injuries. Burfict was always good for an ejection this season - I hope he learns from that but probably not.

    Crosby looks a really good find this year - made some key plays including the forced fumble when the colts looked dangerous.

    When Carr went down I had visions of the home game against the colts when he broke his leg. Very glad to see him get up and play on. Hopefully we can protect him against Mack next week.


  • Registered Users Posts: 830 ✭✭✭Prefab Sprouter


    Kev8360 wrote: »
    Good to win one on the road - even if it was to a team with some key injuries. Burfict was always good for an ejection this season - I hope he learns from that but probably not.

    Crosby looks a really good find this year - made some key plays including the forced fumble when the colts looked dangerous.

    When Carr went down I had visions of the home game against the colts when he broke his leg. Very glad to see him get up and play on. Hopefully we can protect him against Mack next week.
    Yes indeed Kev, a good win and its great to see the offense getting its act together after two games of disappointment. And nice to see the Defense chipping in with that pick 6 towards the end.
    Next week will be interesting and the O-line will need to be at its best. I watched the Vikings-Bears game last night and their front 7 look awfully good. Now, Minnesota's O-line is nothing to write home about but we will need to step up to have any chance. Its an early kickoff in an unfamiliar timezone so I have no illusions about the result but I'll take us being competitive at least. And Chicago dont have a high powered offense so it could be interesting to see if our Defense can limit them. Anyone going to the game?


  • Registered Users Posts: 830 ✭✭✭Prefab Sprouter


    And now Burfict is gone for the season. Great. :(


  • Registered Users Posts: 620 ✭✭✭Kev8360


    Wow. It was a bad tackle for sure but a whole season ban is a real kicker.

    I see he is appealing it - can’t see that getting overturned.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,773 ✭✭✭eire4


    Kev8360 wrote: »
    Wow. It was a bad tackle for sure but a whole season ban is a real kicker.

    I see he is appealing it - can’t see that getting overturned.

    The league is saying this is far from your first offense hence the season ban. I would be surprised if the league budges on this suspension.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,428 ✭✭✭MrKingsley


    eire4 wrote: »
    The league is saying this is far from your first offense hence the season ban. I would be surprised if the league budges on this suspension.

    If they want to make sure(at best as possible) that he doesn’t do then they can’t move from this ban


  • Registered Users Posts: 620 ✭✭✭Kev8360


    I can't defend him as this is his 4th or 5th suspension at this point - even with the season ban I expect next year he will end up in the same spot after another helmet to helmet hit. The only way he stops is when he retires.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 830 ✭✭✭Prefab Sprouter


    I'm annoyed because he was shaping up to be a real leader on Defense. But that type of hit is completely unacceptable. We'll miss the player, not the person.


  • Registered Users Posts: 830 ✭✭✭Prefab Sprouter


    Very enjoyable result last night. The media were all ready to talk about how Mack dominated the Raiders and it didnt happen!! Lots of room to improve but the great thing about last night was watching how fired up the players were. And whilst we are nowhere near challenging for playoffs, its nice to see us go to 3-2 into the bye week, especially with all the controversies that have surrounded us.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,773 ✭✭✭eire4


    Very enjoyable result last night. The media were all ready to talk about how Mack dominated the Raiders and it didnt happen!! Lots of room to improve but the great thing about last night was watching how fired up the players were. And whilst we are nowhere near challenging for playoffs, its nice to see us go to 3-2 into the bye week, especially with all the controversies that have surrounded us.

    I have said a few times already that it is clear the team has improved quite a bit from last season. Probably not enough to challenge for a play off spot but clear improvement nonetheless and considering the Raiders have Chicago's first round draft pick for next season the win helped in that regard a little bit as well.


  • Registered Users Posts: 620 ✭✭✭Kev8360


    eire4 wrote: »
    I have said a few times already that it is clear the team has improved quite a bit from last season. Probably not enough to challenge for a play off spot but clear improvement nonetheless and considering the Raiders have Chicago's first round draft pick for next season the win helped in that regard a little bit as well.

    yep defence is much improved - starting to generate some pass rush and we are much harder to run on this year so far.


  • Registered Users Posts: 830 ✭✭✭Prefab Sprouter


    That first half of football was one of the best halves I've seen the Raiders play in a long time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,773 ✭✭✭eire4


    That first half of football was one of the best halves I've seen the Raiders play in a long time.

    Yes if it wasn't for that crazy fumble in the third the game would have been a walk in the park most likely. But in the end the fact then that Carr was able to lead a fourth quarter come from behind win was a very positive sign that there is a stronger backbone to the team as well.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,718 ✭✭✭golfball37


    97 yard drive to win it after blowing a 17 point lead was very encouraging also.


  • Registered Users Posts: 830 ✭✭✭Prefab Sprouter


    That bye week was very good to us. we get Gabe Jackson back and the Chiefs and Chargers both lose. There's part of me cant wait for the next match and there's part of me that is dreading it. Will Rodgers carve us up or will Jones go off on one? Will our Offense continue to score?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,773 ✭✭✭eire4


    That bye week was very good to us. we get Gabe Jackson back and the Chiefs and Chargers both lose. There's part of me cant wait for the next match and there's part of me that is dreading it. Will Rodgers carve us up or will Jones go off on one? Will our Offense continue to score?

    Given the Packers played Monday so have a day less to rest and prepare that helps. But to my mind all that it will do is make the game more competitive. But still cannot see anything other then a Packers win next weekend.


  • Registered Users Posts: 830 ✭✭✭Prefab Sprouter


    eire4 wrote: »
    Given the Packers played Monday so have a day less to rest and prepare that helps. But to my mind all that it will do is make the game more competitive. But still cannot see anything other then a Packers win next weekend.
    And so it proved Eire4! :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,773 ✭✭✭eire4


    And so it proved Eire4! :D

    Yes sometimes it sucks being right but there was just no way I could see for the Raiders to win away against the Packers. I think it will be a split in the next 2 games as well losing next weekend and winning the weekend after to finish 4-4 for the half way mark which to my mind is about right. I feel the team has made solid progress from last year but is still a long way from being a team that can contend and hence is probably a 500 or thereabouts team right now.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement