Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Property Market 2019

Options
1114115117119120156

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 19,672 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    smurgen wrote: »
    But your point is irrelevant to my situation. It's like telling me Ferraris are alot cheaper than they were while I'm in the market for a bog standard Toyota.

    your situation is neither here nor there, people are saying we are at boom prices and beyond, im saying thats only true (if even im not sure because i dont really care) for a certain cohort of houses, for other sections of the market we are way off.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,933 ✭✭✭smurgen


    Cyrus wrote: »
    your situation is neither here nor there, people are saying we are at boom prices and beyond, im saying thats only true (if even im not sure because i dont really care) for a certain cohort of houses, for other sections of the market we are way off.

    Funny you sound like you care.


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,672 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    smurgen wrote: »
    Funny you sound like you care.

    i dont care about houses in cork in the 350k segment because i dont live there and its not a market that interests me :P


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,426 ✭✭✭ZX7R


    beauf wrote: »

    What bearing does that have on the last resssion though


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,651 ✭✭✭✭beauf


    ZX7R wrote: »
    What bearing does that have on the last resssion though

    Wasn't taking about recession but cork relative to the rest of the country. In terms of its not that different.

    Heres another just for Cork.

    https://www.irishexaminer.com/breakingnews/specialreports/house-prices-special-report-cork-city-prices-up-by-100k-in-five-years-919191.html


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,933 ✭✭✭smurgen


    beauf wrote: »
    Wasn't taking about recession but cork relative to the rest of the country. In terms of its not that different.

    Heres another just for Cork.

    https://www.irishexaminer.com/breakingnews/specialreports/house-prices-special-report-cork-city-prices-up-by-100k-in-five-years-919191.html

    And another couple

    In the last few months I've seen alot of apartments gone on the market in cork. They seem to be extremely expensive for the size. Where I'm living, an apartment block in Rochestown the prices seem eye watering to me for what is on offer. The thing is they do not seem to be shifting at all. I think it's unrealisting pricing on the sellers behalf. I also spotted a luxury apartment block by Sunday's well gone on the market the last few weeks. Cannot see them getting the money they're asking

    https://www.irishexaminer.com/breakingnews/property/pure-corker-impressive-altus-apartments-go-on-sale-for-first-time-947306.html


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I was just chatting to my estate agent as I am listing my house. He said the market has stalled over uncertainty. Good houses are still getting bidding wars. In general it has levelled off, he reckons it will stall this year and start moving up by summer next year.

    My opinion is there isnt a rental in site, theres a huge shortage so it will move again. I am trading up so its irrelevant whether I do my move this year or wait, if i wait i will be paying higher for my trader upper so it's all relevant in terms of pricing


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,116 ✭✭✭Peterx


    I was just chatting to my estate agent as I am listing my house. He said the market has stalled over uncertainty. Good houses are still getting bidding wars. In general it has levelled off, he reckons it will stall this year and start moving up by summer next year.

    My opinion is there isnt a rental in site, theres a huge shortage so it will move again. I am trading up so its irrelevant whether I do my move this year or wait, if i wait i will be paying higher for my trader upper so it's all relevant in terms of pricing

    That's always the bet with pricing though, isn't it?

    If prices continue to soften, or indeed fall, the price differential to that trader upper will also fall.
    How likely is it that your estate agent merely wants to believe house prices will rise again next summer, as opposed to the actual facts of prices remaining stalled - as he knows they are now.

    A lot depends on the price point and my personal belief is that trader uppers are holding off and houses will continue to take a long time to sell at that price point (essentially houses that FTBs can't afford) and there will be further price drops due to circumstances of vendors.

    Good old Brexit could (amazingly) still be in the news next year if Britain asks for another extension.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Peterx wrote: »
    That's always the bet with pricing though, isn't it?

    If prices continue to soften, or indeed fall, the price differential to that trader upper will also fall.
    How likely is it that your estate agent merely wants to believe house prices will rise again next summer, as opposed to the actual facts of prices remaining stalled - as he knows they are now.

    A lot depends on the price point and my personal belief is that trader uppers are holding off and houses will continue to take a long time to sell at that price point (essentially houses that FTBs can't afford) and there will be further price drops due to circumstances of vendors.

    Good old Brexit could (amazingly) still be in the news next year if Britain asks for another extension.

    he knows i am not bothered either way, we were just chatting and exchanging views

    regarding trader upper, i am looking at a house for 350, the houses up the road under construction are close to 400, FTB are going for the new houses as they are brand new and A3 rated plus they get the HTB. This is distorting second hand good houses.

    I am preferring this house although it was built 15 years ago but has a bigger garden, better parking and more green space than the new houses


  • Registered Users Posts: 255 ✭✭bluelamp


    ZX7R wrote: »
    Price's in the rental market never really dropped in the last resssion they raised, and won't in the next, social welfare payment's will increase to help people keep renting

    What? Rental prices halved in a lot of case.

    I viewed a two bed apartment in clontarf in 2011 for 800 euros a month, a three bed house in kilmainham for 1000, and a two bed in drumcondra for 600. That was just Dublin.

    Once you went out to the commuter towns, there were 4 bedroom houses in the likes of Maynooth, Naas, Drogheda, etc renting for 800-900 a month.

    Student accomodation dropped further, complexes in the likes of Cork and Limerick dropped to as low as 50 euros a week per room.

    Rental prices were on the floor from 2008 for the guts of five years - your post is simply untrue.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,585 ✭✭✭Mickiemcfist


    bluelamp wrote: »
    What? Rental prices halved in a lot of case.

    I viewed a two bed apartment in clontarf in 2011 for 800 euros a month, a three bed house in kilmainham for 1000, and a two bed in drumcondra for 600. That was just Dublin.

    Once you went out to the commuter towns, there were 4 bedroom houses in the likes of Maynooth, Naas, Drogheda, etc renting for 800-900 a month.

    Student accomodation dropped further, complexes in the likes of Cork and Limerick dropped to as low as 50 euros a week per room.

    Rental prices were on the floor from 2008 for the guts of five years - your post is simply untrue.

    That wasn't my (anecdotal) experience in South Dublin, rents stayed relatively flat until about 2013 & then started skyrocketing


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,980 ✭✭✭✭Cuddlesworth


    That wasn't my (anecdotal) experience in South Dublin, rents stayed relatively flat until about 2013 & then started skyrocketing

    They dropped like a stone in 2008 + 2009.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 391 ✭✭99problems1


    Would love to know the figures from the last 10 years on rent increases.

    This 4% seems to be increasing them much faster in my experience. Now every year it's going up 4%. It's a massive increase. Shameful from FG.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 32,278 Mod ✭✭✭✭The_Conductor


    Would love to know the figures from the last 10 years on rent increases.

    This 4% seems to be increasing them much faster in my experience. Now every year it's going up 4%. It's a massive increase. Shameful from FG.

    Most landlords would be perfectly happy not to increase the rent for sitting tenants- if they were allowed to reset the rent when tenants changed. The way the 4% increase is structured, a landlord is penalised down the road if/when the tenant eventually moves on- unless they keep with the game.

    It means decent good tenants (the vast majority of tenants) end up getting a 4% per annum increase- where landlords would be perfectly happy to reward them for being good tenants- however, if they do reward a tenant for being a good tenant- any future tenants are entitled to piggyback on the goodwill generated by the original tenant.

    How is that fair?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,585 ✭✭✭Mickiemcfist


    They dropped like a stone in 2008 + 2009.

    https://www.cso.ie/px/pxeirestat/Statire/SelectVarVal/saveselections.asp

    Checked South Dublin, 08 & 09 don't look much lower than average for the 5 years prior. (I was looking at 2 bed apartments, because that's what I was living in at the time)


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 391 ✭✭99problems1


    Most landlords would be perfectly happy not to increase the rent for sitting tenants- if they were allowed to reset the rent when tenants changed. The way the 4% increase is structured, a landlord is penalised down the road if/when the tenant eventually moves on- unless they keep with the game.

    It means decent good tenants (the vast majority of tenants) end up getting a 4% per annum increase- where landlords would be perfectly happy to reward them for being good tenants- however, if they do reward a tenant for being a good tenant- any future tenants are entitled to piggyback on the goodwill generated by the original tenant.

    How is that fair?

    Probably! When these rules were brought (3 years ago?) in my rent went up 15%.

    Then last year it went up 4% and now again it's going up 4%. It hadn't gone up in the years before that.

    So in total my rent has gone up 24% in 3 years. FG never getting a vote from me again.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,975 ✭✭✭optogirl


    Probably! When these rules were brought (3 years ago?) in my rent went up 15%.

    Then last year it went up 4% and now again it's going up 4%. It hadn't gone up in the years before that.

    So in total my rent has gone up 24% in 3 years. FG never getting a vote from me again.

    same here - no increase until FG suggested capping it at 4% and it's gone up 4% every year since.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,520 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    This thread is worse than the soccer forum for all of the vested interests and lack of objectivity (on both sides).


  • Registered Users Posts: 992 ✭✭✭rightmove


    optogirl wrote: »
    same here - no increase until FG suggested capping it at 4% and it's gone up 4% every year since.

    FG have been really bad for tenants and good for reits


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,205 ✭✭✭✭hmmm


    It means decent good tenants (the vast majority of tenants) end up getting a 4% per annum increase- where landlords would be perfectly happy to reward them for being good tenants

    How is that fair?
    Lots of us pointed out that this would happen, but the quick fix brigade demanded rent controls as the solution. They are economic morons, and government and the media need to stop listening to them.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 591 ✭✭✭mike_cork


    hmmm wrote: »
    Lots of us pointed out that this would happen, but the quick fix brigade demanded rent controls as the solution. They are economic morons, and government and the media need to stop listening to them.

    What could possibly go wrong with more govt/state interference in the property market :pac:


  • Registered Users Posts: 992 ✭✭✭rightmove


    mike_cork wrote: »
    What could possibly go wrong with more govt/state interference in the property market :pac:
    At the end it's the tenants that were ultimately blindsided with the media beating the drums to the tune of hang the landlord. Landlord left and tenant stuck with it now


  • Registered Users Posts: 591 ✭✭✭mike_cork


    rightmove wrote: »
    At the end it's the tenants that were ultimately blindsided with the media beating the drums to the tune of hang the landlord. Landlord left and tenant stuck with it now

    This


    I feel every step the govt has undertaken in the market (both rental and people purchasing homes) has made things worse. With the current regulatory climate (never mind the anti landlord stuff in the press/online) I think you would be crazy to be a small landlord.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,980 ✭✭✭✭Cuddlesworth


    https://www.cso.ie/px/pxeirestat/Statire/SelectVarVal/saveselections.asp

    Checked South Dublin, 08 & 09 don't look much lower than average for the 5 years prior. (I was looking at 2 bed apartments, because that's what I was living in at the time)

    As somebody who moved 4 times in 5 years from 2008, you could negotiate well under asking on most places. The bottom end was around 200 quid above rent allowance. So cheap places stayed static, more up market properties(penthouses/large houses) tanked in price and could be picked up for a steal. I moved into a 3 bed penthouse that went from 2500+ a month to 1400 a month. I've recently seen another apartment renting for over 3k there.

    A lot of people just didn't pay much attention and didn't move to take advantage of it.


  • Administrators Posts: 53,365 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    hmmm wrote: »
    Lots of us pointed out that this would happen, but the quick fix brigade demanded rent controls as the solution. They are economic morons, and government and the media need to stop listening to them.

    The thing that always amuses me about this complaining is the notion of pre-RPZs, landlords weren't increasing rent out of the goodness of their own hearts.

    "Ah sure good tenants are getting their rents increased by 4% every year now, it's shocking!".

    Reality: rents always went up. Rent increases are not an invention of the RPZs. The idea that rents would be lower if it weren't for the RPZs is laughable, a story that nobody is buying.

    What's next? Discard the RPZs and we'll see rent rates plummet? Please...


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 391 ✭✭99problems1


    awec wrote: »
    The thing that always amuses me about this complaining is the notion of pre-RPZs, landlords weren't increasing rent out of the goodness of their own hearts.

    "Ah sure good tenants are getting their rents increased by 4% every year now, it's shocking!".

    Reality: rents always went up. Rent increases are not an invention of the RPZs. The idea that rents would be lower if it weren't for the RPZs is laughable, a story that nobody is buying.

    What's next? Discard the RPZs and we'll see rent rates plummet? Please...

    Rented for 4 years and rent never went up from 2013-2016. Then this rent cap came in and I had a review and increase of 15% and 4% 2 years after and another 4% this year.

    It's very true.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,493 ✭✭✭Villa05


    awec wrote:
    Reality: rents always went up. Rent increases are not an invention of the RPZs. The idea that rents would be lower if it weren't for the RPZs is laughable, a story that nobody is buying.


    Was very true when I was renting. Landlords put a value on a good tennant. This value translated to below market rent for many Tennant's.

    RPZs have ended this practice and rents have increased substantially in areas outside RPZs as landlords prepared for there arrival.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,651 ✭✭✭✭beauf


    awec wrote: »
    The thing that always amuses me about this complaining is the notion of pre-RPZs, landlords weren't increasing rent out of the goodness of their own hearts.

    "Ah sure good tenants are getting their rents increased by 4% every year now, it's shocking!".

    Reality: rents always went up. Rent increases are not an invention of the RPZs. The idea that rents would be lower if it weren't for the RPZs is laughable, a story that nobody is buying.

    What's next? Discard the RPZs and we'll see rent rates plummet? Please...

    Rents have not always gone up.

    https://touch.daft.ie/report/stephen-kinsella

    Also if rents go up, sometimes massively. They can only do that if they were lower to begin with.

    If you go back even further...

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thejournal.ie/rent-1990s-different-times-better-cheaper-more-money-1968583-Mar2015/%3famp=1


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,651 ✭✭✭✭beauf


    If you try sell a property stuck on a low rent it will hurt that value of that house. Also since you can't raise the rent at the end of a tenancy you are now limited to when you can do it.

    Therefore it would be stupid not to raise the rent and do so at every opportunity. If you are not in a rpz you have to act as if it could made one tomorrow.

    Or just sell up to someone who isn't going to rent it.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,651 ✭✭✭✭beauf


    Anyway the damage is done now. No point complaining about it now. That ship has sailed.

    Next they will try block LL from selling which will cause a load to sell just in case.

    They'll pull out of their investments and wait for the market to drop and may reinvest at that point.

    Maybe...


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement