Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Is it just me or have SF vanished?

1183184186188189200

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,004 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    SafeSurfer wrote: »
    Yet again with the selective certainty and willingness to “hazard a guess” that your experiences reflect everyone else’s experience.
    Yet your opinion on questions hat you don’t want to answer remains “I don’t know”.

    Francie has it down to a fine art in fairness.

    Feign ignorance and write something generic to describe something serious, 'it happens everywhere!'
    Move the goalposts if the above doesnt work.
    Whatbabout over another issue that moves the goalposts to another pitch.
    Or... if that fails, talk about Leo or FG and posts pic or tweet.

    Rinse and repeat.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,650 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    Well list these things then for us, tell us WHAT YOU KNOW with such certainty:

    1. How many 'informers' can you actually name?

    2. How many sexual abusers can you name?

    You won't name any of these communities 'living in fear, then and now', maybe you will share 1, and 2, above.

    Maybe you could explain why parents not living in fear would deliver their children to be shot?

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,004 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    jm08 wrote: »
    No. Not at all. Criminal gangs and Mafia would be wiped out in a few days if British Army troops were after them. When internment was introduced about 2,000 people were interned without trial.

    Oh yes, and that is why there was zero crime during the entire troubles and why organsied crime and mafia organisation from Italy to Russia are no longer! :rolleyes::rolleyes:

    The PIRA had zero mandate. Its the worst example of creationist evangelical nonsense to say that they did.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,095 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    markodaly wrote: »
    ...and the classic Francie response to SF criticism.

    Post up a photo of Leo, as if that is an argument.
    Are you still sore about the fact that when you type in "Gerry Adams murderer" that one gets 1.5 million hits?
    Maybe that is because Gerry who was never in the IRA Adams did indeed order the murder of people.


    Anyway, getting back on topic.

    So what is SF's position on Hong Kong, seeing as one of their MEP's abstained in bringing China to the International Criminal Court of their illegal clamdown in Hong Kong and MoN's fawning to China in a recent video call?

    I never typed in 'Gerry Adams Murderer' in my life.

    If you used google for anything other than your bias youmight have come across this, in which the Chinese more or less admit to gilding the lily and the politician's involve spell out their positions.

    Nice try mark...but the story died on you.

    https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/china-removes-statement-on-ni-leaders-respect-for-hong-kong-security-laws-39443514.html


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 322 ✭✭Superfoods


    Well list these things then for us, tell us WHAT YOU KNOW with such certainty:

    1. How many 'informers' can you actually name?

    2. How many sexual abusers can you name?

    You won't name any of these communities 'living in fear, then and now', maybe you will share 1, and 2, above.

    At the moment you just seem to be fishing for information then replaying it back. Look at the last few posts when someone mentioned anything about the troubles, next post if from you with a little "story"

    You support Sinn Fein and are clearly passionate about them. You must have read every single book/article on them. Why bother making up stories? they have a murky past. Trying to hide that won't change it.

    Making out the PIRA was the local good guy is laughable, majority where psycopaths that had no issues hurting or killing people for no reason than the person was in the wrong place at the wrong time.

    Remember the Shankill bombing, they knew the target was not in chip shop, they walked in and seen children/women etc. This was not a remote bomb. These people are now seemingly your best mate down the pub?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,095 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    SafeSurfer wrote: »
    Maybe you could explain why parents not living in fear would deliver their children to be shot?

    Jesus SS, I have never said that punishment beatings or shootings didn't happen.

    Where are the 'communities living in fear, then and now'?

    A woman is not a 'community'


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,004 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    During the recent trial of the murder of Det. Garda Adrian Donohoe, where Aaron Brady was convicted of capital murder, it was said, and these are in the court records, that:

    "The atmosphere of South Armagh was mentioned repeatadly during the trial, with Gardai admitting that people along the border were slow to talk. People can be killed for doing so, it was said during the trial"


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,826 ✭✭✭Truthvader


    Intimidation of witnesses is a targetted and individual thing. I have several times now said it goes on and went on.

    But we are talking about the trope of 'communities living in fear, then and now'.

    STILL not a single example of one given.

    Two words

    Paul. Quinn.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,095 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Superfoods wrote: »
    I know for certainty you never lived anywhere close to the border during the troubles

    At the moment you just seem to be fishing for information then replaying it back. Look at the last few posts when someone mentioned anything about the troubles, next post if from you with a little "story"

    You support Sinn Fein and are clearly passionate about them. You must have read every single book/article on them. Why bother making up stories? they have a murky past. Trying to hide that won't change it.

    Making out the PIRA was the local good guy is laughable, majority where psycopaths that had no issues hurting or killing people for no reason than the person was in the wrong place at the wrong time.

    Remember the Shankill bombing, they knew the target was not in chip shop, they walked in and seen children/women etc. This was not a remote bomb. These people are now seemingly your best mate down the pub?

    I'll ignore that for the nonsense it is.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,004 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    I never typed in 'Gerry Adams Murderer' in my life.

    Maybe you should, you may learn something.

    If you used google for anything other than your bias youmight have come across this, in which the Chinese more or less admit to gilding the lily and the politician's involve spell out their positions.

    Nice try mark...but the story died on you.

    https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/china-removes-statement-on-ni-leaders-respect-for-hong-kong-security-laws-39443514.html


    Doesnt answer the question. What is SF's position on it?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,095 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Truthvader wrote: »
    Two words

    Paul. Quinn.

    The 'community' that lives in fear, but still elects COnor Murphy over and over again with a massive vote.

    Have you never stopped to think about that one?

    Can you rationalise it for us?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,826 ✭✭✭Truthvader


    The 'community' that lives in fear, but still elects COnor Murphy over and over again with a massive vote.

    Have you never stopped to think about that one?

    Can you rationalise it for us?

    Honestly no. It is absolutely beyond me why or how any normal human being could vote for or support anything connected to Sinn Fein/ IRA. But as you and thousands like you demonstrate time and again you have no problem with the murders and thievery


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,095 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    markodaly wrote: »
    Maybe you should, you may learn something.




    Doesnt answer the question. What is SF's position on it?

    It's there in the article,
    “I made it very clear that I supported the ‘One Country, Two Systems’ international agreement.”

    Chinese Embassy gilds the lily...sindo and the usual suspects swallow the bait. Chinese Embassy withdraws spin...usual suspects slink away...muttering about sinister stuff...etc etc.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,095 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Truthvader wrote: »
    Honestly no. It is absolutely beyond me why or how any normal human being could vote for or support anything connected to Sinn Fein/ IRA. But as you and thousands like you demonstrate time and again you have no problem with the murders and thievery

    Nor do you wish to understand.

    So would you agree that a massive majority of the community electing somebody in free and democratic elections is not consistent with a lazy trope of 'communities living in fear, then and now'?

    If not, what is it 'consistent' with?


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,301 ✭✭✭✭jm08


    markodaly wrote: »
    Oh yes, and that is why there was zero crime during the entire troubles and why organsied crime and mafia organisation from Italy to Russia are no longer! :rolleyes::rolleyes:

    The PIRA had zero mandate. Its the worst example of creationist evangelical nonsense to say that they did.


    Strangely enough, in most countries, they observe the international convention on human rights which in this kind of case means you can't just round up people and throw them in jail in normal countries.



    Still, the UK seems to be determined to leave this organisation, so no doubt in the future they will just round up all criminals and just throw them in jail.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 322 ✭✭Superfoods


    I'll ignore that for the nonsense it is.


    I expected you would ignore it.

    So far your fantasy land doesn't include the PIRA walking into a chip shop with a bomb and looking at children knowing they would kill them.

    You want everyone to believe you somehow lived in the border during the "troubles" and everything was rosy, apart from the British Army. You have to wonder why they called them the "troubles" and why the Good Friday Agreement was such a momentous occasion in Irish History.

    According to you sure everything was grand before it. Sure why did they even bother? It falling apart quickly the little stories isn't it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,650 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    Jesus SS, I have never said that punishment beatings or shootings didn't happen.

    Where are the 'communities living in fear, then and now'?

    A woman is not a 'community'


    A woman is not a community!

    A woman. Singular. Because only one child was shot or beaten by your heroes. Really Francie. By arguing in the face of reality you undermine everything you say.

    www.bbc.com/news/amp/uk-northern-ireland-49153095

    https://www.rte.ie/archives/2019/1004/1081089-father-denis-faul/

    www.irishtimes.com/news/dundalk-beatings-blamed-on-the-ira-1.1118133%3fmode=amp

    www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/paramilitaries-control-ni-communities-with-muscle-and-fear-1.2628383%3fmode=amp

    https://magill.ie/archive/fear-and-loathing-fermanagh

    Maybe now Francie you would be kind enough to provide some links to support your belief that no communities lived in fear during the troubles.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,004 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    STILL not a single example of one given.

    https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/torture-gang-vows-to-kill-five-quinn-bosses-38519219.html

    Werent you on here last year, laughing at the abduction and torture of Kevin Lumney?
    Yes, yes you were!


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,826 ✭✭✭Truthvader


    Nor do you wish to understand.

    So would you agree that a massive majority of the community electing somebody in free and democratic elections is not consistent with a lazy trope of 'communities living in fear, then and now'?

    If not, what is it 'consistent' with?

    A sick society that has lost its way


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,095 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    SafeSurfer wrote: »

    Maybe now Francie you would be kind enough to provide some links to support your belief that no communities lived in fear during the troubles.

    I never claimed that:

    Here is what I said initially
    I was totally aware of 'republican figures', but this 'community living in fear stuf' is a complete and utter nonsense here.
    In respect of the town I lived in for the best part of 50 years I am not aware of a single 'punishment beating/shooting' or a 'republican figure laying down the law as you say was widespread.

    It's an easy thing to print and say, much harder to find evidence of it being a widespread phenomena.
    Punishment beatings happened in certain areas, we all know that, but whole communities living in fear across NI and along the border does not for a minute match the reality, it's a gross distortion of the truth, just as representing the area as 'lawless' is.

    You still haven't named one single community, much less demonstrate it was widespread.

    That is evidence in and of itself that what we have here is a classic 'trope' and a lazy one at that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,095 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    markodaly wrote: »
    https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/torture-gang-vows-to-kill-five-quinn-bosses-38519219.html

    Werent you on here last year, laughing at the abduction and torture of Kevin Lumney?
    Yes, yes you were!

    What?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,004 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    What?

    You heard me, you made a big joke about that incident.
    Laughing about the torture of a man.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,095 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    markodaly wrote: »
    You heard me, you made a big joke about that incident.
    Laughing about the torture of a man.

    Where?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,095 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Truthvader wrote: »
    A sick society that has lost its way

    So any community/constituency that returns a SFer is 'sick'?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,004 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    jm08 wrote: »
    Strangely enough, in most countries, they observe the international convention on human rights which in this kind of case means you can't just round up people and throw them in jail in normal countries.



    Still, the UK seems to be determined to leave this organisation, so no doubt in the future they will just round up all criminals and just throw them in jail.

    Again, you are trying to shift the discussion.

    The truth of it is, criminal organisations like the mafia or the PIRA can survive by sheer fear and terror alone, yet they do not have the support of the wider community.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,826 ✭✭✭Truthvader


    So any community/constituency that returns a SFer is 'sick'?

    Yep, now you have it.

    It is not OK to murder random people in pursuit of any anything or to break the legs of children, steal, extort etc etc. 25% of the population don't seem to know that or are happy to live with it on the promise of free housing or a united Ireland - or whatever Mary Lou promises them from time to time. Not OK. Sick and lost.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,095 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Truthvader wrote: »
    Yep, now you have it.

    It is not OK to murder random people in pursuit of any anything or to break the legs of children, steal, extort etc etc. 25% of the population don't seem to know that or are happy to live with it on the promise of free housing or a united Ireland - or whatever Mary Lou promises them from time to time. Not OK. Sick and lost.

    What about the communities that elect the people who sent the British Army here, who killed children (18 of them that we know about, alleged to have killed far more) and innocent people too, again many that we know about and many that are alleged...sick as well?


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,301 ✭✭✭✭jm08


    SafeSurfer wrote: »
    A woman is not a community!

    A woman. Singular. Because only one child was shot or beaten by your heroes. Really Francie. By arguing in the face of reality you undermine everything you say.

    www.bbc.com/news/amp/uk-northern-ireland-49153095

    https://www.rte.ie/archives/2019/1004/1081089-father-denis-faul/

    www.irishtimes.com/news/dundalk-beatings-blamed-on-the-ira-1.1118133%3fmode=amp

    www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/paramilitaries-control-ni-communities-with-muscle-and-fear-1.2628383%3fmode=amp

    https://magill.ie/archive/fear-and-loathing-fermanagh

    Maybe now Francie you would be kind enough to provide some links to support your belief that no communities lived in fear during the troubles.


    Can you answer my question of whether you are able to distinguish between PIRA, New IRA etc.


    When you have answered that, I'll ask you another.


    For the record (any of the links I clinked on post GFA were all dissident republican activities). The criticism of Sinn Fein seems to be that the PIRA had legitimised this kind of activity during the Troubles.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,301 ✭✭✭✭jm08


    markodaly wrote: »
    Again, you are trying to shift the discussion.

    The truth of it is, criminal organisations like the mafia or the PIRA can survive by sheer fear and terror alone, yet they do not have the support of the wider community.


    You are wrong in the case of the PIRA. The nationalist community turned to the PIRA for defence when attacked by the RUC/BA/loyalist paramilitaries. Internment and the hunger strikes won them all the community support they needed.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,826 ✭✭✭Truthvader


    What about the communities that elect the people who sent the British Army here, who killed children (18 of them that we know about, alleged to have killed far more) and innocent people too, again many that we know about and many that are alleged...sick as well?

    "What about". You just cant stop yourself can you.

    Not going into all this again but for starters the British Army was actually sent here to protect the Catholic community from their Protestant neigbours. There were some disgraceful acts committed by the British Army but unlike Sinn Fein IRA they were not full time dedicated to murder and thuggery


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 11,301 ✭✭✭✭jm08


    Truthvader wrote: »
    Yep, now you have it.

    It is not OK to murder random people in pursuit of any anything or to break the legs of children, steal, extort etc etc. 25% of the population don't seem to know that or are happy to live with it on the promise of free housing or a united Ireland - or whatever Mary Lou promises them from time to time. Not OK. Sick and lost.


    Are Sinn Fein murdering random people?
    Do you see any difference between Sinn Fein and Dissident Republicans. Just answer Yes or No.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,095 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Truthvader wrote: »
    "What about". You just cant stop yourself can you.

    Not going into all this again but for starters the British Army was actually sent here to protect the Catholic community from their Protestant neigbours. There were some disgraceful acts committed by the British Army but unlike Sinn Fein IRA they were not full time dedicated to murder and thuggery

    OF COURSE you don't want to go into it. Of course! :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,650 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    jm08 wrote: »
    Can you answer my question of whether you are able to distinguish between PIRA, New IRA etc.


    When you have answered that, I'll ask you another.


    For the record (any of the links I clinked on post GFA were all dissident republican activities). The criticism of Sinn Fein seems to be that the PIRA had legitimised this kind of activity during the Troubles.

    Did you watch the Fr. Denis Faul interview from1984?

    Get back to me when you have.

    Good lad.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,095 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    jm08 wrote: »
    You are wrong in the case of the PIRA. The nationalist community turned to the PIRA for defence when attacked by the RUC/BA/loyalist paramilitaries. Internment and the hunger strikes won them all the community support they needed.

    The abiding tragedy that the moralising partitionists and those who ignored the constitutional imperative to protect were a party too.
    They, (and some of them knowingly) allowed a vacuum to develop into which somebody was always going to step.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,826 ✭✭✭Truthvader


    jm08 wrote: »
    Are Sinn Fein murdering random people?
    Do you see any difference between Sinn Fein and Dissident Republicans. Just answer Yes or No.

    no


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,004 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    jm08 wrote: »
    You are wrong in the case of the PIRA. The nationalist community turned to the PIRA for defence when attacked by the RUC/BA/loyalist paramilitaries. Internment and the hunger strikes won them all the community support they needed.

    Then why did the SDLP outpoll them at every election until 2001?

    The vast majority of nationalists rejected SF and their provo brothers, until the PIRA stopped killing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,095 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    markodaly wrote: »
    Then why did the SDLP outpoll them at every election until 2001?

    The vast majority of nationalists rejected SF and their provo brothers, until the PIRA stopped killing.

    Again, like the Adams fantasy allegations that don't equate to anything that happens in real life, this theory that the 'electorate' suddenly trusted SF is a nonsense.


    It's 25 yrs since the GFA and the southern electorate (the partitionist element) are still going on about distrust but SDLP voters 'suddenly' switched over. :):)

    The reality is, the SF election machine didn't really get going until the 90's and they grew their support all the way through despite, censorship, intimidation, a fairly spectacular anti SF bias in the media and the not trivial fact that members of SF were shot dead.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,665 ✭✭✭Bonniedog


    SF MEP McManus abstained on a vote criticising China for Hong Kong repression.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,301 ✭✭✭✭jm08


    markodaly wrote: »
    Then why did the SDLP outpoll them at every election until 2001?

    The vast majority of nationalists rejected SF and their provo brothers, until the PIRA stopped killing.


    Were they running candidates. Didn't Gerry Adams take Gerry Fitt's seat in West Belfast in the early 80s?


    By the way, that link to Kevin Lunney's beatings and attempted murder - it says that the Continuity IRA were believed to behind it, not the PIRA as you seem to be claiming.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 322 ✭✭Superfoods


    jm08 wrote: »
    Were they running candidates. Didn't Gerry Adams take Gerry Fitt's seat in West Belfast in the early 80s?


    By the way, that link to Kevin Lunney's beatings and attempted murder - it says that the Continuity IRA were believed to behind it, not the PIRA as you seem to be claiming.


    The Real IRA, the Continuity IRA, the Makeuppy IRA


    It's all the one group. Anything that happens now it is "dissident Republicans" but check into their history and surprise surprise they are part of the PIRA. THey suddenly jumped ship :p


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,004 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Again, like the Adams fantasy allegations that don't equate to anything that happens in real life, this theory that the 'electorate' suddenly trusted SF is a nonsense.


    It's 25 yrs since the GFA and the southern electorate (the partitionist element) are still going on about distrust but SDLP voters 'suddenly' switched over. :):)

    The reality is, the SF election machine didn't really get going until the 90's and they grew their support all the way through despite, censorship, intimidation, a fairly spectacular anti SF bias in the media and the not trivial fact that members of SF were shot dead.

    Calls into question the fact that SDLP outpolled SF at every election until 2001.
    Then, admits its in the next paragraph.

    :D

    But sure, you never voted SF in your life until recently, am I right? :P


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,004 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    jm08 wrote: »
    Were they running candidates. Didn't Gerry Adams take Gerry Fitt's seat in West Belfast in the early 80s?

    Not as many as they should have. They were too busy trying to murder and bomb their way to a United Ireland. But I guess they didn't have as much support as they thought they had.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,095 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    markodaly wrote: »
    Calls into question the fact that SDLP outpolled SF at every election until 2001.

    Another lie mark. I didn't question the fact that they outpolled them. Look again without the blinkers on.

    You are getting desperate, lying several times today now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,004 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Another lie mark. I didn't question the fact that they outpolled them.

    So nationalists gave the SDLP a bigger mandate than SF up to 2001. :D
    As I have said all along, SF/PIRA had no majority support from nationalists for their acts of terror and murder. I am glad we can agree on that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,095 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    markodaly wrote: »
    So nationalists gave the SDLP a bigger mandate than SF up to 2001. :D
    As I have said all along, SF/PIRA had no majority support from nationalists for their acts of terror and murder. I am glad we can agree on that.

    When have I ever claimed that?

    The simple FACT (those things you detest) is that SF were not equal to the SDLP as an electoral machine for reasons already outlined. Had they been then they would have eclipsed the SDLP long before they did.
    I can't be bothered going to the trouble AGAIN to show you the data on this as you will doubtless try to claim something else was said.

    I can't stand posters who lie about what other posters said and when challenged slink and slither away into silence.
    You told a lie about me today and the Kevin Lunney incident and refused to back it up. You know you did it and I hope you are proud of that. At least one other poster knows you did too. You ruled yourself out of being taken as a credible debater.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,365 ✭✭✭✭McMurphy


    Superfoods wrote: »
    The Real IRA, the Continuity IRA, the Makeuppy IRA


    It's all the one group. Anything that happens now it is "dissident Republicans" but check into their history and surprise surprise they are part of the PIRA. THey suddenly jumped ship :p

    Ok, going by this logic - same IRA Michael Collins and Fine Gael evolved from so?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,004 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    When have I ever claimed that?

    The simple FACT (those things you detest) is that SF were not equal to the SDLP as an electoral machine for reasons already outlined. Had they been then they would have eclipsed the SDLP long before they did.

    If my Auntie had balls she would be a thoroughbred horse. :D:D

    The only fact we know, not some made up 'What if', or "could have" bollix that you like to lean on is that the SDLP up to 2001 was the party most nationalists supported.

    The rest is mere conjecture and bull****, done to peddle a myth that most nationalists supported a ragtag bunch of murderers, rapists, bombers and child killers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,095 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    markodaly wrote: »
    If my Auntie had balls she would be a thoroughbred horse. :D:D

    The only fact we know, not some made up 'What if', or "could have" bollix that you like to lean on is that the SDLP up to 2001 was the party most nationalists supported.

    The rest is mere conjecture and bull****, done to peddle a myth that most nationalists supported a ragtag bunch of murderers, rapists, bombers and child killers.

    The myth peddled is that the switch from the SDLP was sudden...it wasn't anything like that and actually follows the pattern you would expect of a party gradually building their electoral base and performance.

    The bizarre idea that people switched en masse to vote for a party in the volatile post GFA period when the IRA had still not de-comissioned, police reform had not been achieved is 'actual' mythmaking because as we know in the south, that is not the way REAL life works.

    So you cling to that level of analysis if you wish...who cares what you think. You are not interested in informed analysis.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,928 ✭✭✭Bishop of hope


    McMurphy wrote: »
    Ok, going by this logic - same IRA Michael Collins and Fine Gael evolved from so?

    Not sure how you jumped to that conclusion.
    The provos departed from the IRA who then became known as the official IRA.
    Their stance on who and what should be targeted was the reason for the split as far as I know.
    The provos only formed themselves at the beginnings of the troubles, so they are relatively new.
    Again the continuity IRA formed from that because they didn't support the GFA as they reckoned that was a surrender.
    The provos were prepared to kill civilian targets and bomb civilian businesses, in short they were considered ruthless and psychopathic by others at the time.
    Of course this was true.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 322 ✭✭Superfoods


    The myth peddled is that the switch from the SDLP was sudden...it wasn't anything like that and actually follows the pattern you would expect of a party gradually building their electoral base and performance.

    The bizarre idea that people switched en masse to vote for a party in the volatile post GFA period when the IRA had still not de-comissioned, police reform had not been achieved is 'actual' mythmaking because as we know in the south, that is not the way REAL life works.

    So you cling to that level of analysis if you wish...who cares what you think. You are not interested in informed analysis.


    It seems you have one memory of history, your entitled to your view of course


    Don't expect the rest of the World to believe that rubbish


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement