Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Unpopular Opinions - OP Updated with Threadban List 4/5/21

16869717374151

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,517 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    Famine was not kind to Ireland. The historian estimates are the population would be 15 million if it had not happened.

    How were all these millions supposed to have been fed, clothed and employed?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,466 ✭✭✭blinding


    How were all these millions supposed to have been fed, clothed and employed?
    How were populations increased in other countries that the British were not wilfully starving People in ? ?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,705 ✭✭✭Cheerful Spring2


    How were all these millions supposed to have been fed, clothed and employed?

    I think point made here is most of the Irish catholic emigration occurred during the Potato famine. The people just didn't decide one day to leave in huge numbers, there was a reason behind it.


  • Posts: 8,647 [Deleted User]


    The lockdown in Dublin didn't happen soon enough.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,820 ✭✭✭✭freshpopcorn


    I’d like to see attractive people give the government briefing about Covid. I think people might pay more attention to them.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,845 ✭✭✭Antares35


    Quazzie wrote: »
    I think I'll continue to what I deem to be polite and hold the door open for people. If a woman wants to see me as a misogynist for doing so, then that's her prerogative, and it's fine with me because it's exactly the type of person I would want to avoid so it will be a good warning system.

    :) I'm a woman and I think it's nice when people (men or women) hold a door open. I'd hate to be the kind of person who volunteers for anger and indignation so easily. I agree with you, it's a nice thing to do. Not everything has to be a statement on sexism.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,845 ✭✭✭Antares35


    Well, there has to be more to it than this it else everyone would hold the door for everyone and nobody would get though doors.

    There's the practicality of which way the door opens, towards you or away from you. And who gets to the door first.

    If a door opens away from you and you get there first then you probably walk through and hold it open for the people on the other side.

    It's the ones who stand prostrate in the door which opens away from them and hold it open as people have to shuffle past them, that are cringe.

    And yeah, you'll find plenty of men who think it's correct to hold a door for women because they're women and offer a seat to a woman because she's a woman. They'll tell you it's the manners they were raised with and they won't (or can't) change. That's just a mostly benign misogyny. Manners change over time so it's grand.

    Is it not exhausting to undertake all the mental gymnastics you've outlined above to make a simple decision whether to hold a door for someone or not? I couldn't live like that, I'd be worn out by lunchtime.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 9,078 ✭✭✭IAMAMORON


    I think point made here is most of the Irish catholic emigration occurred during the Potato famine. The people just didn't decide one day to leave in huge numbers, there was a reason behind it.

    More chrap, really clueless.

    If the global population was circa 1 - 1,2 billion in 1896 ( 40 odd years after the end of the great famine), how come it has multiplied to 8 billion now?

    https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/world-population-by-year/

    So if the population of the 32 counties was circa 5 million then, how come it isn't 35 million now? Condom nonsense aside. Actually do me a favour please, I fancy a laugh today, can you just reply and say it was something or other, just make something like you always do?

    relandeuropepopulation1750.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,513 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    IAMAMORON wrote: »
    More chrap, really clueless.

    If the global population was circa 1 - 1,2 billion in 1896 ( 40 odd years after the end of the great famine), how come it has multiplied to 8 billion now?

    https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/world-population-by-year/

    So if the population of the 32 counties was circa 5 million then, how come it isn't 35 million now? Condom nonsense aside. Actually do me a favour please, I fancy a laugh today, can you just reply and say it was something or other, just make something like you always do?

    relandeuropepopulation1750.png

    we have had continued high emigration since the famine with the exception of the 2 world wars. you also have to remember that the majority of those emigrating are those of child rearing age. It is very hard for the population to grow when the young people leave


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,466 ✭✭✭blinding


    Antares35 wrote: »
    :) I'm a woman and I think it's nice when people (men or women) hold a door open. I'd hate to be the kind of person who volunteers for anger and indignation so easily. I agree with you, it's a nice thing to do. Not everything has to be a statement on sexism.
    Why not attractive naked people having sex ! !


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,820 ✭✭✭✭freshpopcorn


    Regarding holding doors open.
    When I was about 16 I was at a wedding. I held the door open for one or two people.
    Then I was to shy to leave it go so I got stuck there for about twenty minutes. Everybody kept on going in and out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,553 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Antares35 wrote: »
    :) I'm a woman and I think it's nice when people (men or women) hold a door open. I'd hate to be the kind of person who volunteers for anger and indignation so easily. I agree with you, it's a nice thing to do. Not everything has to be a statement on sexism.

    Yeah but we're back to changing opening doors for women specifically because they're women to holding doors for people because it's sensible and polite.

    I doubt a significant number of people would get cross about someone holding a door when it's just the sensible thing to do.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,553 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Antares35 wrote: »
    Is it not exhausting to undertake all the mental gymnastics you've outlined above to make a simple decision whether to hold a door for someone or not? I couldn't live like that, I'd be worn out by lunchtime.

    It's not difficult thinking at all. You do it all the time or how else would you know whether to hold the door open or not? I'll bet you've just never explicitly thought it through before.

    Do you know the scene I'm describing? Where the person is standing prostrate with their back to the door, holding it open so people can walk through first?


  • Registered Users Posts: 260 ✭✭Munstergirl854


    In regards to Population....

    The reproduction rate in Ireland up to the 1980's was staggering. Rife poverty,no contraception and families of 12 or 15 children was not unheard of.
    Surely if that rate of reproduction did not occur, the population today would be significantly smaller?


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,402 ✭✭✭McGinniesta


    Kneeling before a premier league game does nothing to eradicate racism.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,001 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    If you think that person who threw a milkshake over Leo yesterday was right to do so, you are a tit of the highest order.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,402 ✭✭✭McGinniesta


    NIMAN wrote: »
    If you think that person who threw a milkshake over Leo yesterday was right to do so, you are a tit of the highest order.

    In addition, whatever their problem was will not be addressed by doing so.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,497 ✭✭✭kowloonkev


    Kneeling before a premier league game does nothing to eradicate racism.

    It probably fuels it if anything. Makes me want to vomit.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,402 ✭✭✭McGinniesta


    kowloonkev wrote: »
    It probably fuels it if anything. Makes me want to vomit.

    A far better starting point would be looking into the stands sometimes.

    I lived in England for a number of years and held a season ticket at a premier league club. I went to hundreds of games and I had very little if any experience of racism in stadia. You'd be a fool to believe that it doesnt exist in football stadia but I wonder what the actual levels of it are.

    It certainly exists abroad and we have seen clear examples of that.

    Whether or not it exists in the professional game itself in terms of recruitment or outlook I cant say but with number of foreign players in the game it's not easy to see how.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,612 ✭✭✭Gervais08


    Kneeling before a premier league game does nothing to eradicate racism.

    I said the and was told to educate myself and that I was a white woman and had no idea.

    I still have no idea how a pointless, token and very much forced gesture can solve any societal issue.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 9,078 ✭✭✭IAMAMORON


    Regarding holding doors open.
    When I was about 16 I was at a wedding. I held the door open for one or two people.
    Then I was to shy to leave it go so I got stuck there for about twenty minutes. Everybody kept on going in and out.

    That is daylight abuse, you can get counselling for that.

    Never dress like a concierge to a wedding either, live a little.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,402 ✭✭✭McGinniesta


    Gervais08 wrote: »
    I said the and was told to educate myself and that I was a white woman and had no idea.

    I still have no idea how a pointless, token and very much forced gesture can solve any societal issue.

    It doesn't. It does nothing to tackle the problem in any meaningful fashion.

    Besides, racism is a societal problem and should be treated as such. People will behave in football grounds the same way that they behave outside of them.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,402 ✭✭✭McGinniesta


    An unpopular question.

    What will happen next if the restrictions in Dublin fail to work as anticipated?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 9,078 ✭✭✭IAMAMORON


    An unpopular question.

    What will happen next if the restrictions in Dublin fail to work as anticipated?

    The Zombie Apocalypse of course.

    Looking forward to taking dead aim at George Lee's Zombie head myself, ( and Claire Byrnes ).

    My Blunderbus is loaded.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,907 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    An unpopular question.

    What will happen next if the restrictions in Dublin fail to work as anticipated?

    Send any culchies living in Dublin to Spike Island.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,256 ✭✭✭Ubbquittious


    Android operating system is a ferocious croc of sh1t. It's the Windows XP of it's day.

    Nearly 100% of the apps in the app store contain ads or spyware, the games are all pay to win, pay to play, in app purchases or just plain pay. A lot of the so-called open source apps are modified versions of the original with bundled spyware and adware. Even if you install no apps the Almighty GOOG is still spying on you through Google Play Services, location services and various other things. Although the operating system itself doesn't cost anything the Almighty GOOG does all it can to hoik you in permanently and make you nice and dependent on their services.

    The bluetooth functionality and USB connectivity appear to have been deliberately crippled over the years to make sure you use Google cloud services to transfer data instead.

    If you are on 2G data nothing seems to work anymore because your little bitteen of bandwidth is presumably clogged up with apps phoning home with all the data they've been collecting on you.

    The problem now is no new operating system can get a look in because of the app-gap, again similar to Windows back in the day. Which shouldn't be a problem really because all the apps are sh1te anyway. Only thing keeping me using it is the fact that nearly everyone uses whatsapp


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,402 ✭✭✭McGinniesta


    Send any culchies living in Dublin to Spike Island.

    Controversial.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 9,078 ✭✭✭IAMAMORON


    Send any culchies living in Dublin to Spike Island.

    Thing is you wouldn't fit them. Make them swim over maybe?

    Better off marching them straight into the Shannon, if they can swim over to the far side then they are quite obviously culchies ( or from Connaught ) and can then be shot on sight. It's about time we sorted out the problem with this country for once and for all.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,402 ✭✭✭McGinniesta


    IAMAMORON wrote: »
    Thing is you wouldn't fit them. Make them swim over maybe?

    Better off marching them straight into the Shannon, if they can swim over to the far side then they are quite obviously culchies ( or from Connaught ) and can then be shot on sight. It's about time we sorted out the problem with this country for once and for all.

    Sounds like the D-Day landings


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,426 ✭✭✭ressem


    I didn't say it was misogyny in relation to people in general (or holding a door when it's the practical thing to do), I gave an example of awkwardly holding the door for women because they're women...

    Assuming that's what you meant then sure, do as you want. You'll probably povide the same service of marking yourself for young people watching you exhibit the very definition of virtue signalling.

    Hmm, I stand with my arm outstretched holding a door, if someone male or female is approaching the door that looks burdened. E.g. trying to wheel a bicycle, cart; carrying a bag or 2, especially in the hand on the hinge side,

    Or, if I think the alternative is a sidestep to avoid collision after going through the door. ( I think this is prone to accusations of misogyny)

    Or if it's a heavy door, or a door behaving in an unexpected way (a sensor door but powered off) ,or there are wind gusts, or even just heavy rain.

    I don't think my brain's capable of adding in the "avoid virtue signalling" calculus into that also. Or if I tried, I'd end up releasing the door in a delayed way that risks hitting their arm. Not worth the risk for 5 seconds of a wait, when I'll feel guilty about it for hours. So if it helps, I'm being selfishly self-protective.

    And for the younger people, male and female that do the same for me, thanks.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 9,078 ✭✭✭IAMAMORON


    Sounds like the D-Day landings

    That was called target practice. ( Zielpraxis )

    The Nazi infantry held lotteries in Paris to see who got to defend the beaches.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,907 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    Send any culchies living in Dublin to Spike Island.
    Controversial.
    IAMAMORON wrote: »
    Thing is you wouldn't fit them. Make them swim over maybe?

    Better off marching them straight into the Shannon, if they can swim over to the far side then they are quite obviously culchies ( or from Connaught ) and can then be shot on sight. It's about time we sorted out the problem with this country for once and for all.

    I have two culchie parents and all. Swim will do them no harm - sure wouldn't that Shannon water kill any covid19!? I am not sure I would waste a bullet on them though (not economical) :D

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 9,078 ✭✭✭IAMAMORON


    I have two culchie parents and all. Swim will do them no harm - sure wouldn't that Shannon water kill any covid19!? I am not sure I would waste a bullet on them though (not economical) :D

    You are technically a culchie also, be careful... we have ways of making you talk.


  • Posts: 17,378 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Android operating system is a ferocious croc of sh1t. It's the Windows XP of it's day.

    Nearly 100% of the apps in the app store contain ads or spyware, the games are all pay to win, pay to play, in app purchases or just plain pay. A lot of the so-called open source apps are modified versions of the original with bundled spyware and adware. Even if you install no apps the Almighty GOOG is still spying on you through Google Play Services, location services and various other things. Although the operating system itself doesn't cost anything the Almighty GOOG does all it can to hoik you in permanently and make you nice and dependent on their services.

    The bluetooth functionality and USB connectivity appear to have been deliberately crippled over the years to make sure you use Google cloud services to transfer data instead.

    If you are on 2G data nothing seems to work anymore because your little bitteen of bandwidth is presumably clogged up with apps phoning home with all the data they've been collecting on you.

    The problem now is no new operating system can get a look in because of the app-gap, again similar to Windows back in the day. Which shouldn't be a problem really because all the apps are sh1te anyway. Only thing keeping me using it is the fact that nearly everyone uses whatsapp

    Sounds like you're just really bad at using Android.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,553 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    ressem wrote: »
    Hmm, I stand with my arm outstretched holding a door, if someone male or female is approaching the door that looks burdened....

    So not doing it for women because they're women which would obviously be misogynistic.

    Why do posters keep replying but keep switching this part from it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,256 ✭✭✭Ubbquittious


    Sounds like you're just really bad at using Android.




    Ah shur with a name like that I wouldn't expect anything other than a cheap dig from you


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,479 ✭✭✭AllForIt


    Ah shur with a name like that I wouldn't expect anything other than a cheap dig from you

    Oh how I laughed at that one.

    You do have a point overall.

    I'm a hobbyist android developer and I was recently working on a kernel for my fone to improve it. Guess what I found in the source code, explicit code that gives facebook app advanced 'privileges' which in layman's terms means the app will run in the background and not go into standby - when the phone is in standby. This is coded into the android system before you take it out of the box and before you even install facebook in the first place.

    To me that's outrageous and I think there should be laws prohibiting that sort of thing.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,845 ✭✭✭Antares35


    Yeah but we're back to changing opening doors for women specifically because they're women to holding doors for people because it's sensible and polite.

    I doubt a significant number of people would get cross about someone holding a door when it's just the sensible thing to do.

    But women are people :D So if you hold a door for a woman because she's a person not because she's a woman, how will she differentiate that from holding the door for her because shes a woman? How will she know whether to be angry? Perhaps for the avoidance of doubt men should state why they are holding the door. If he states he is holding the door because she is a person, she can say thank you and walk through. If he says it's because she's a woman, she can become enraged and refuse to move until it slams in her face :)

    To keep on topic, my unpopular opinion is that cake smashes for one year olds are a literal waste of money and a crass display of well wastefulness.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,117 ✭✭✭✭Junkyard Tom


    The vast bulk of 1980's music was utterly terrible.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,404 ✭✭✭Justin Credible Darts


    Gervais08 wrote: »
    I said the and was told to educate myself and that I was a white woman and had no idea.
    I still have no idea how a pointless, token and very much forced gesture can solve any societal issue.




    I hope you pointed out to them the fact they brought your color and sex in to it made them racist and sexist.


    that would have stumped them


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,553 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Antares35 wrote: »
    But women are people :D So if you hold a door for a woman because she's a person not because she's a woman,...

    Yeah I'd support holding doors for peope when it's practical. Holding the door for others when it's practical (thus polite) isn't a problem anyone has raised.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,517 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    Kneeling before a premier league game does nothing to eradicate racism.

    It's easy for a bunch of pampered millionaires this side of the pond to do it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,019 ✭✭✭Iscreamkone


    Premier league players are worthy of their wages


  • Registered Users Posts: 43 Jimmy Twotimes


    Antares35 wrote: »
    Is it not exhausting to undertake all the mental gymnastics you've outlined above to make a simple decision whether to hold a door for someone or not? I couldn't live like that, I'd be worn out by lunchtime.

    Lay off. The guy is obviously autistic.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,402 ✭✭✭McGinniesta


    Premier league players are worthy of their wages

    Why? Half of them don't earn it for playing football.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,019 ✭✭✭Iscreamkone


    Why? Half of them don't earn it for playing football.

    They earn it for playing football and because they play football.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,402 ✭✭✭McGinniesta


    They earn it for playing football and because they play football.

    Some of them are shyte at playing football and therefore cannot justify their hefty salaries


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,820 ✭✭✭✭freshpopcorn


    I think some people end up settling and getting married to somebody they don't find attractive or even have a connection with just so they can be seen as doing the done thing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,653 ✭✭✭cms88


    I think some people end up settling and getting married to somebody they don't find attractive or even have a connection with just so they can be seen as doing the done thing.

    Add to that many, not all, women do it have kids etc because that's what they want and once they have it they're gone.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,032 ✭✭✭colm_c


    AllForIt wrote: »
    Oh how I laughed at that one.

    You do have a point overall.

    I'm a hobbyist android developer and I was recently working on a kernel for my fone to improve it. Guess what I found in the source code, explicit code that gives facebook app advanced 'privileges' which in layman's terms means the app will run in the background and not go into standby - when the phone is in standby. This is coded into the android system before you take it out of the box and before you even install facebook in the first place.

    To me that's outrageous and I think there should be laws prohibiting that sort of thing.

    Sounds like total BS to me.

    Go on show us the code?


  • Advertisement
Advertisement