Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Brexit discussion thread X (Please read OP before posting)

Options
24567317

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 13,164 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    Strazdas wrote: »
    It depends who 'they' are. Apparently Macron was very annoyed about the October extension and didn't want to give it and had to be persuaded to do so by Merkel and a few others. But he sent the clear message out that he has had enough and wants no more extensions after this.

    There's a story he told Varadkar to ramp up his preparations for No Deal at that meeting.
    I think he said "I hope you are prepared".



    Tusks "Use this time wisely" was equally pointed. I think only a GE or a proposed referendum (with the correct question) would persuade them to extend again. And a GE may not be enough.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 518 ✭✭✭Lackadaisical


    I don’t think it’ll convince Macron. It’s just going to be “see!! I told you so.”

    France wasn’t keen on the last extension. A further one would likely be a bridge too far.


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,359 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty


    I don’t think it’ll convince Macron. It’s just going to be “see!! I told you so.”

    I think the EU have enough now. Johnson will told what to do with himself in Paris and Berlin.


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,488 ✭✭✭✭Sand


    BluePlanet wrote: »
    I had read somewhere that there were ranklings in some quarters that the WA already offered Britain too much access.
    It's madness they turned it down, they won't get a better deal, ever.

    They really wont. I've seen the point made that the WA was governed by Article 50 so only requires a majority of member states to pass. Whereas if they exit no-deal, an agreement with a third country requires 100% ratification by all member-states, including Belgium with its regional parliaments which almost sunk the Canadian deal. The British will need to appease each and every interest in each and every EU member state.

    The British have truly squandered any and all opportunities they may have had. Brexit is necessary to force a hard reset of the insular, navel gazing nonsense that passes for British politics. It will be a hard, sharp shock and the impact will be brutal but sometimes you have to hit rock bottom to change.


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,359 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty


    Sand wrote: »
    They really wont. I've seen the point made that the WA was governed by Article 50 so only requires a majority of member states to pass. Whereas if they exit no-deal, an agreement with a third country requires 100% ratification by all member-states, including Belgium with its regional parliaments which almost sunk the Canadian deal. The British will need to appease each and every interest in each and every EU member state.

    The British have truly squandered any and all opportunities they may have had. Brexit is necessary to force a hard reset of the insular, navel gazing nonsense that passes for British politics. It will be a hard, sharp shock and the impact will be brutal but sometimes you have to hit rock bottom to change.

    That's a very good point and frightening too.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 11,035 ✭✭✭✭J Mysterio


    How about this for a story. Brexiteers used the 'threat of Turkey joining EU' to encourage a Leave vote. Now, because of that Leave vote, and with the damage it has caused, they are hoping the 'Turkish Army Fund' might buy British Steel to save it!

    BBC News: Turkish army pension fund to buy British Steel


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,085 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Brexit is a revolution (of the ignorant). Like most revolutions in history it is being hijacked and the common man will be the one to suffer the most.

    By this stage the only way this will end is for Brexit to become a dirty word like communism became in most of Europe (unfortunately it took 70 years for that to collapse under its weight of contradictions)

    It's a quite bizarre revolution though in that it is led by the privileged and the elite (Johnson, Gove, Davis, Raab, Farage, Rees-Mogg, Banks, Cummings etc)

    Where was the working class movement for Brexit in the years up to 2016? Many (most?) of its most fanatical followers seem to be conservative and middle class.


  • Registered Users Posts: 393 ✭✭Foghladh


    J Mysterio wrote: »
    How about this for a story. Brexiteers used the 'threat of Turkey joining EU' to encourage a Leave vote. Now, because of that Leave vote, and with the damage it has caused, they are hoping the 'Turkish Army Fund' might buy British Steel to save it!

    BBC News: Turkish army pension fund to buy British Steel

    You think that British Steels problems started with the 2016 Referendum?


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,253 ✭✭✭PropJoe10


    Well, Ken is up for it: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-49372525

    Long way to go before that situation becomes a reality but I think he'd be an excellent choice. And is retiring soon so not a threat to anyone long-term.


  • Registered Users Posts: 21,886 ✭✭✭✭Roger_007


    Strazdas wrote: »
    It's a quite bizarre revolution though in that it is led by the privileged and the elite (Johnson, Gove, Davis, Raab, Farage, Rees-Mogg, Banks, Cummings etc)

    Where was the working class movement for Brexit in the years up to 2016? Many (most?) of its most fanatical followers seem to be conservative and middle class.

    Most British working class are conservative with a small 'c'. Many Labour voters, (especially the older generation), tend to be socially conservative. They still regard the aristocracy and the monied classes as their 'betters'. They worship Churchill who was virulently anti union and anti working class. They worship the royal family who epitomise inherited wealth and privilege.
    Is it any wonder that they followed the advice of the upper-class 'little englanders', (who will not suffer financially), and voted for Brexit.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 21,520 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    PropJoe10 wrote: »
    Well, Ken is up for it: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-49372525

    Long way to go before that situation becomes a reality but I think he'd be an excellent choice. And is retiring soon so not a threat to anyone long-term.

    In keeping with everything that Brexit has been, the best suited to this will be kept far away from it. Dominic Grieve, Ken Clarke et al have just too much sense to threaten the anarchists.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,118 ✭✭✭Melanchthon


    serfboard wrote: »
    As always, the timeless quote from Yes, Minister applies:

    This is coming from the top of the German government and is communicating the following to the British: Away with your threatening no-deal, because we're fully prepared to let you go through with it.

    Germany really isn't prepared for a no deal with the current economic climate, there is a standard reply to this is which is

    "Oh but the UK will collapse and they will be splitting peoples heads open to feast on the goo inside, its like shooting yourself in the head etc etc etc"

    Fact is though this is not that relevant, at the minute no deal is the default outcome because of whats actually been voted through parliament. Something has to be offered even if its just to save face and Macron will have to non make any combative statements for a few weeks because some sort of deal is needed.

    Germany is not healthy economically at the minute and only the most willfully blind will ignore this but it will be ignored and the standard replies will be given.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,035 ✭✭✭✭J Mysterio


    Foghladh wrote: »
    You think that British Steels problems started with the 2016 Referendum?

    The economic repercussions of the Brexit death march certainly havent helped, but that's not really my main point. More that a Turkish group - connected to the Army no less - is looking to save British steel manufacturing from insolvency.

    Im aware that succesive governments have failed to support British manufacturing more generally. My point here is that the current government seem happy enough with the Turkish Army buying out British Steel, despite the nasty rhetoric.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,745 ✭✭✭Irish Praetorian


    J Mysterio wrote: »
    The economic repercussions of the Brexit death march certainly havent helped, but that's not really my main point. More that a Turkish group - connected to the Army no less - is looking to save British steel manufacturing from insolvency.

    Im aware that succesive governments have failed to support British manufacturing more generally. My point here is that the current government seem happy enough with the Turkish Army buying out British Steel, despite the nasty rhetoric.


    To be fair the current governing party was also quite happy to block EU measures designed to protect steel manufacturing within the union, so the irony of a potentially saviour coming from a UKIP bogeyman is really just gilding the lily.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 517 ✭✭✭Varta


    Germany really isn't prepared for a no deal with the current economic climate, there is a standard reply to this is which is

    "Oh but the UK will collapse and they will be splitting peoples heads open to feast on the goo inside, its like shooting yourself in the head etc etc etc"

    Fact is though this is not that relevant, at the minute no deal is the default outcome because of whats actually been voted through parliament. Something has to be offered even if its just to save face and Macron will have to non make any combative statements for a few weeks because some sort of deal is needed.

    Germany is not healthy economically at the minute and only the most willfully blind will ignore this but it will be ignored and the standard replies will be given.
    If Germany's economy is in some degree of difficulty it has nothing to do with the Brits. Nothing will be offered. Stop deluding yourself. Only Brits will split open brit heads to feast on the goo but, thankfully, they are on an island and the rest of us need not worry.


  • Registered Users Posts: 393 ✭✭Foghladh


    J Mysterio wrote: »
    The economic repercussions of the Brexit death march certainly havent helped, but that's not really my main point. More that a Turkish group - connected to the Army no less - is looking to save British steel manufacturing from insolvency.

    Im aware that succesive governments have failed to support British manufacturing more generally. My point here is that the current government seem happy enough with the Turkish Army buying out British Steel, despite the nasty rhetoric.

    It appeared to be your main point because your post said it was 'because of'. You risk going down the Jamie Oliver line where he shut down restaurants because of Brexit and other businesses set up in place and are doing quite well. Brexit will be the greatest excuse of this decade


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,923 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


    Foghladh wrote: »
    It appeared to be your main point because your post said it was 'because of'. You risk going down the Jamie Oliver line where he shut down restaurants because of Brexit and other businesses set up in place and are doing quite well. Brexit will be the greatest excuse of this decade

    And you don't think Brexit is having an effect and hastening the demise of certain businesses?

    What businesses are doing quite well in place of his restaurants?


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,085 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Roger_007 wrote: »
    Most British working class are conservative with a small 'c'. Many Labour voters, (especially the older generation), tend to be socially conservative. They still regard the aristocracy and the monied classes as their 'betters'. They worship Churchill who was virulently anti union and anti working class. They worship the royal family who epitomise inherited wealth and privilege.
    Is it any wonder that they followed the advice of the upper-class 'little englanders', (who will not suffer financially), and voted for Brexit.

    Yes, as working classes go, they are a very peculiar one......blindly following a load of toffs and millionaires as they take Britain over the edge of a cliff.


  • Registered Users Posts: 393 ✭✭Foghladh


    And you don't think Brexit is having an effect and hastening the demise of certain businesses?

    What businesses are doing quite well in place of his restaurants?

    Well where I live The Ivy set up in the same location and is booked out most evenings.


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,034 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    Foghladh wrote: »
    Well where I live The Ivy set up in the same location and is booked out most evenings.

    The Ivy has been one of the most established restaurants in London for decades.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 203 ✭✭sandbelter


    I think the EU have enough now. Johnson will told what to do with himself in Paris and Berlin.


    I'm think that crunch ultimatums may not occur in either Berlin or Paris next week, but when Trump and Savini in the room as well at the G7 summit.



    i suspect in Moscow they're just seeing all upside in this.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,648 ✭✭✭gooch2k9


    Germany really isn't prepared for a no deal with the current economic climate, there is a standard reply to this is which is

    "Oh but the UK will collapse and they will be splitting peoples heads open to feast on the goo inside, its like shooting yourself in the head etc etc etc"

    Fact is though this is not that relevant, at the minute no deal is the default outcome because of whats actually been voted through parliament. Something has to be offered even if its just to save face and Macron will have to non make any combative statements for a few weeks because some sort of deal is needed.

    Germany is not healthy economically at the minute and only the most willfully blind will ignore this but it will be ignored and the standard replies will be given.

    Why does it always fall to the EU to have to make changes and offers? In what way have the UK moved during any of the negotiations?


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,164 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    gooch2k9 wrote: »
    Why does it always fall to the EU to have to make changes and offers? In what way have the UK moved during any of the negotiations?
    It doesn't matter what is offered. It will immediately be greeted with another obstacle. The sows ear of brexit will never transform into a silk purse. And that's been the problem since the beginning. Nothing will ever match either the promises that were made or square the circle that brexit; once defined, will ever be acceptable. Which is why no deal is the de facto end point. It maintains the illusion without anyone having to admit that it was a crap idea to start with.


  • Registered Users Posts: 21,520 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    gooch2k9 wrote: »
    Why does it always fall to the EU to have to make changes and offers? In what way have the UK moved during any of the negotiations?

    Boris Johnson has moved house 3 times since negotiations started to be fair.

    It's just more of the same narrative from the UK, they're trying the 'if you say it enough, people will expect it is reasonable and likely to happen' approach.

    Michael Gove saying to the EU via a TV interview that the UK is standing by, ready to negotiate, in good faith made me laugh. In good faith, while simultaneously calling the agreed backstop and WA to be undemocratic.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,850 ✭✭✭Stop moaning ffs


    Not to be a naysayer but I’m not seeing the question asked here by our media, but where are these checks going to take place and how?
    Listening to that bbc report Kermit posted yesterday and loathe as I am to admit it, sammy bloody Wilson pointed out these checks already do happen. I get that we need to establish and get the British to agree to regulatory alignment for NI at least but I can’t see that happening in the short term.
    It is ireland that’s going to have to do the dirty work after the 31st, if the Brits do indeed leave. But then the onus and pressure is on us for the border no?


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,164 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    Although the tweet says it all, the bit that was removed was his promise to start 'this week' on upgrades to hospitals. In fact it was three weeks and the money was already allocated.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,118 ✭✭✭Melanchthon


    Varta wrote: »
    Germany really isn't prepared for a no deal with the current economic climate, there is a standard reply to this is which is

    "Oh but the UK will collapse and they will be splitting peoples heads open to feast on the goo inside, its like shooting yourself in the head etc etc etc"

    Fact is though this is not that relevant, at the minute no deal is the default outcome because of whats actually been voted through parliament. Something has to be offered even if its just to save face and Macron will have to non make any combative statements for a few weeks because some sort of deal is needed.

    Germany is not healthy economically at the minute and only the most willfully blind will ignore this but it will be ignored and the standard replies will be given.
    If Germany's economy is in some degree of difficulty it has nothing to do with the Brits. Nothing will be offered. Stop deluding yourself. Only Brits will split open brit heads to feast on the goo but, thankfully, they are on an island and the rest of us need not worry.

    That's my point, the German economy is wobbly now before Brexit, brexit would of course harm UK more but it will hit key German sectors to a certain extent. Why do you think in general Merkel has played good cop compared to others because this is understood.
    This sub is very very ideologically pro-EU but I don't get how posters here don't understand how statements by Macron and Junker both pretty unpopular individuals themselves and leaks particularly the big one probably by Martin Selymar play straight into the ERG's hands.

    The requirement of DUP support is the issue on UK side and that was a screw up offer Borris (without leaking it first) something like 2-5 year limit on backstop for the WA end of which would trigger a immediate NI border/status poll and I believe it would pass with labour rebel support.


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,359 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty


    prawnsambo wrote: »
    It doesn't matter what is offered. It will immediately be greeted with another obstacle. The sows ear of brexit will never transform into a silk purse. And that's been the problem since the beginning. Nothing will ever match either the promises that were made or square the circle that brexit; once defined, will ever be acceptable. Which is why no deal is the de facto end point. It maintains the illusion without anyone having to admit that it was a crap idea to start with.
    No point in offering anything anyway. Sixty Tory MPs will vote down the WA even if the backstop is removed.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,164 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    Not to be a naysayer but I’m not seeing the question asked here by our media, but where are these checks going to take place and how?
    Listening to that bbc report Kermit posted yesterday and loathe as I am to admit it, sammy bloody Wilson pointed out these checks already do happen. I get that we need to establish and get the British to agree to regulatory alignment for NI at least but I can’t see that happening in the short term.
    It is ireland that’s going to have to do the dirty work after the 31st, if the Brits do indeed leave. But then the onus and pressure is on us for the border no?
    Well the pressure should land where it belongs. On the UK. And the obvious solution is to put a de facto border in the Irish Sea. And the UK will acquiesce with checks in Larne. Most NI exports go through Dublin and vice versa. So that's why we've been working on expanding facilities there. We really only need to cover a few weeks before reality forces matters. All my opinion of course.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,576 ✭✭✭Enzokk


    Not to be a naysayer but I’m not seeing the question asked here by our media, but where are these checks going to take place and how?
    Listening to that bbc report Kermit posted yesterday and loathe as I am to admit it, sammy bloody Wilson pointed out these checks already do happen. I get that we need to establish and get the British to agree to regulatory alignment for NI at least but I can’t see that happening in the short term.
    It is ireland that’s going to have to do the dirty work after the 31st, if the Brits do indeed leave. But then the onus and pressure is on us for the border no?

    We will not know until they have left and we will not make arrangements or plans until that happens. Because if we do start these arrangements it will become a self fulfilling prophecy. Because we started the plans means we are ready for it to happen so we are not looking to avoid it. It really is that simple, the strategy for those on the other side is to try and get us to admit that there can be a border. If they can get us to admit a border can happen but not on the border then they have won. That is why you get the talk of different VAT rules and the likes from Brexiteers, it is throwing anything that sticks.

    That's my point, the German economy is wobbly now before Brexit, brexit would of course harm UK more but it will hit key German sectors to a certain extent. Why do you think in general Merkel has played good cop compared to others because this is understood.
    This sub is very very ideologically pro-EU but I don't get how posters here don't understand how statements by Macron and Junker both pretty unpopular individuals themselves and leaks particularly the big one probably by Martin Selymar play straight into the ERG's hands.

    The requirement of DUP support is the issue on UK side and that was a screw up offer Borris (without leaking it first) something like 2-5 year limit on backstop for the WA end of which would trigger a immediate NI border/status poll and I believe it would pass with labour rebel support.


    Yes the German economy is wobbly, but so is everybody else right now. There are a variety of factors to this and one of them us Brexit. So the question is, will the German economy make a recovery if the EU gives the UK the deal they want? I suspect it will not as this is just a slowdown that happens all the time, what comes up must come down. The key for governments is to make the downturn as short as possible and start growing again.

    With Trump in the White House, it is hard to predict when the sunny uplands will return. With him shouting tariffs every few seconds is making everyone nervous and with a lot of economies still tender from the GFC, well its not great for anyone right now. Add in a sprinkling of Brexit is not helping, but its like bandaging a paper cut when you have been in a car accident. Yes it helps but it is a small problem in the wider context.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement