Are there any credible conspiracy theories?

Not liking the official story.  

Buildings collapse all the time due to different reasons. Buildings of this type this steel frame have never happened ever in history and certainly never at freefall acceleration. In light of the fact that this was a first in history, official details about the collapse have proven to be deeply flawed and suspect, you have to look at conspiracy. The official report authors went out of their way to remove construction on girders, as Mick pointed out. You don't think it's suspect the girder failed without this construction? In relation to Column 79, NIST claimed a girder/beam interlocked with it moved off its position during thermal expansion leading to the collapse of other steel girders. It has been admitted by Mick that NIST removed stiffener plates and shear studs and even got seat sizes wrong and other things that would prevent girders from moving. To people like you, it's unimportant, but to others, it shows a lack of interest in finding out the truth or covering it up what actually happened?

An overview of the events

Around 2003, NIST was given the task to examine what happened to the building. It took them until 2008 to draft a report, which did not mention that the building collapsed at freefall for a period of time.

According to the truther argument, all the columns were there across the building and in a flash they were all gone, causing the building to undergo a freefall period.

At the draft conference Aug 2008, a physic teacher in the truth movement was able to engage in a question and answer session. Asked NIST why is there no freefall mention in your report?

Answer back was this and provided video of this exchange of minds.

NIST: [A] free-fall time would be an object that has no structural components below it.... What the analysis shows...is that same time it took for the structural model to come down...is 5.4 seconds. It’s about 1.5 seconds, or roughly 40 percent, more time for that free fall to happen. And that is not at all unusual because there was structural resistance that was provided in this particular case.”

Using their model, they excluded freefall due to a time delay of 5.4 seconds

. Freefall means that all structural resistance underneath goes away instantly, and the only way to accomplish that is through controlled demolition

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) published a revised final report in November 2008 and stated that freefall takes place in stages. In the final report, it is claimed that the freefall is acceptable only after the final columns are buckled. It went from impossibility to possibility in a matter of months. In that report, they claim there is still resistance but don't clarify what they mean (resistance is resistance). Only NIST understands what they mean since they don't specify. It is apparent from their own computer modelling that this is all imagination and made up since we can see where there should be a freefall happening and the buckling is still occurring below. The final report of NIST was a fraud meant to conceal the real implications of what happened to steel columns inside building 7. 

Okay, what's the fraud exactly, who did what?

You forgot to precede your spiel with “in my opinion”, because it is not clear to logically thinking people.

How did they rig the two biggest skyscrapers in the world while staying undetected?

That's not what I asked you.

Another pathetic dodge.

This is a conspiracy theory forum. How they planted the explosives is a huge part of any conspiracy.

And you have no answers and therefore no theory. Just waffle. As per usual.

"A few guys" lol

I don't accept his wierd theory, but that is probably the easy bit.

Modern office buildings have false ceilings, it's easy to get into that space. There are maintenance and cleaning staff, generally run by external companies, so theoretically it would be possible to get teams in to plant the explosives. Unlikely in the extreme that it happened, but not an insurmountable problem.

Now if Trump had owned the buildings and needed the insurance money that might make it more credible and even likely!!!!

Considering the events of that day where planes were hijacked and flew all over the country in an attempt to target buildings anything possible. If the neocons plan to take out seven Arab countries, then this terrorist attack will be used to exacerbate the situation. A week later, Anthrax attacks targeted politicians and some died. There was clearly something major going on. Later, it was discovered that the anthrax was not made in a foreign lab, but rather was made in a US military lab. This was a coordinated effort to create panic and fear. The unusual anomalies found here after the building fell clearly indicate that some people took down these buildings in order to create even more panic and fear. 

Most conspiracies tend to be 100% untrue ... but there are a few that may have some truth in them ... let's review a few ...

1 Dead JFK ... it is easy for this to be a conspiracy because there has been no definite proof about who had him killed and why ... the mafia the cubans the russians the Republic of Gilead all have been blamed ... simple as this ... one of these or some combination is true but the others are not ...

2 Elvis being alive ... there is no concrete evidence of this being true ... no post 1977 recordings have surfaced on bootlegs ... nothing ... Elvis was a great singer but sadly he is dead .. but lives forever via his music ..

3 Diana's murder ... while it is true dodgy carry on happened during the period after her death it is hard to know for sure how she died ... accident or murder ... strange that things were swapped ... no way would the Ritz have a drunk driver ... esp for Diana ... just no way ...

4 'Islamic Republic' of Iran being an undercover ally of USA ... most definitely the case ... I believe this one 100% ... 43 years in power and Ali Khamenei was never touched ...

5 Trump working for Putin ... defo ... and links in with 4 too ... all what we are lead to believe is fake with these corrupt individuals ...

6 Ukraine being run by Nazis who are creating pandemics to infect Russia ... 100% false but a war was justified because some senior members of Russia's regime believe it 100% to be true ...

7 WMD in Iraq ... 100% false but also used to justify a war ... this time by those welknown warmongers the Republicans ...

8 The Jew/Commie plot ... 100% false but Hitler justified his wars akin to 6 and 7 and it lead to WW2 ...

9 Pervert priests agents of the KGB ... 100% false and used to excuse corruption in the RC church ...

10 9/11 being staged ... probably not but surely someone should have known about this plot and did not act ...

11 Most of the Covid 19 anti vax anti mask stuff ... 100% false ... among the daftest rubbish you are likely to hear ...

12 Alien and UFO stuff ... probably 90% false but I do believe in alien life ... but I also believe in science fiction being a genre ...

13 Reality TV and most modern music being made to destroy people's intelligence ... could just be true !!!

14 Trump owning the World Trade Org and its NY HQ ... and he being behind 9/11 for insurance purposes and/or to destroy evidence ... I'd love it to be true but it ain't ...

15 Trump winning the 2020 election ... 100% lies ... stop the steal did happen ... Trump's attempt to steal that is ...

Can secretly rig an entire skyscraper for demolition

Can't destroy files in their own office

Documents that there's no evidence for and no one would have ever known about if they didn't call attention to them by faking a terrorist attack in a way that made it look obviously fake to even uneducated people.

"But only like one of each of those groups. We need to keep this under 16 people. Also call this 70 year old property developer with no expertise in demolition. Sure hope he can keep a secret..."

Here's an example of how a plausible 9/11 conspiracy would go:

Al Qaeda were planning an attack on American soil. Elements in the US government and/or CIA believed that this would be a useful evn to help gain public support for policies, specifically a more aggressive international policy. Those elements, then simply stopped intelligence reports about this planned attack from reaching the right people that could have raised the alarm about it. This was easily done because of the archaic and culture of secrecy between agencies that was well documented by the various 9/11 investigations. It would also be very easy to justify and excuse as an honest mistake.

The elements could have ranged from a single higher up in the CIA who acted on his own. Or it could have been a directive from the president. It would have been trivial to keep something like that secret.

This theory could be stretched a bit to include the notion that the conspirators helped the attack along, like perhaps throwing off investigators or giving the attackers visa clearance when they would have otherwise been flagged.

They could have even given them material support.

There's no need for them to plant secret high tech explosives that have never been used before. There's no need for them to have secret double planes to buzz the pentagon. It's simple, direct and most importantly plausible.

But no conspiracy theorists are interested in a theory like this because it's kinda boring. There's no shocking evidence that makes for a good youtube video.

And just to make it abundantly clear in case some one is determined to misrepresent me, I don't personally subscribe to this theory. I don't believe that it actually happened. I don't have any evidence to support it because I just plucked it out of my ass.