Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Sherlock [** SPOILERS **]

Options
16162646667

Comments

  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Regional West Moderators Posts: 6,773 Mod ✭✭✭✭connemara man


    ^

    In all fairness the ordinary done this well is rare that's why it's highlighted in such a manner


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,759 ✭✭✭cython


    pinkypinky wrote: »
    No, Dr Strange was finished filming well before they started on this season of Sherlock.

    "Well before" is a slight stretch, at least according to Wikipedia, which claims Dr Strange wrapped on April 3rd, and Sherlock season 4 started on April 4th ;) Obviously no overlap still, and there's no guarantee that Cumberbatch was on either set at those exact times, but definitely exaggeration as to the time between the productions there!


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,854 ✭✭✭Ceist_Beag


    A review in the Independent (from where I don't usually get my opinions!) broadly accused Gatiss of using trickery and editing to conceal a straightforward plot, and I'm somewhat in agreement. When the plot descends into the murky world of Sherlock's mind, the viewer is forced to suspend judgement, not knowing what is real and not. And I don't think it's a satisfying conclusion to then drop viewers back into the real world and say, Bam - the daughter is actually the sister. Ha, didn't see that coming did you?!. Because I don't feel shock. I don't feel I'm invested in the mystery. Just watching to see what I am told happens next.

    Would go along with that as it was my first impression after - too much misdirection for the sake of it. I did enjoy it all the same but it's very different viewing. Not so much a show that you watch trying to figure things out before it unfolds, more one you watch for the superb way it is shot, the great lines and acting, and how you can then digest it all after and try and make sense of what you have just viewed.

    BTW I removed the spoilers as it is something we already viewed and as has been said, this thread has "Spoilers" in the title!


  • Registered Users Posts: 33,446 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    I've heard it said that a great mystery is one where you get all the pieces throughout the story but it's only at the end that you see how they all fit together. A bad mystery is one where you just get all the pieces at the end practically already put together.

    In fairness to Sherlock, the pieces about Sherlock's sister were there. The same actress playing all three roles (which I never copped), the repeated hints about something happening in his childhood which pointed to another brother (but like the first time Sherlock met John and thought his brother gave him his phone, it was a sister), "Miss Me?" being from his sister rather than Moriarty...

    The pieces were there. The big mystery at the end was all the pieces we'd be given being put together as opposed to a shock surprise ending for the sake of it.

    I thought it was done brilliantly.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,644 Mod ✭✭✭✭pinkypinky


    cython wrote: »
    "Well before" is a slight stretch, at least according to Wikipedia, which claims Dr Strange wrapped on April 3rd, and Sherlock season 4 started on April 4th ;) Obviously no overlap still, and there's no guarantee that Cumberbatch was on either set at those exact times, but definitely exaggeration as to the time between the productions there!

    Fair enough, but he would have had the little goatee for most of the filming, and wore hair pieces for both that and the huge beard (in the Nepal scenes), whereas the Sherlock scruff just looks like he didn't shave for a week in real life.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,775 ✭✭✭CelticRambler


    When the plot descends into the murky world of Sherlock's mind, the viewer is forced to suspend judgement, not knowing what is real and not.

    That's how I've felt about it since the "Brides" episode last Christmas. I'm quite happy to believe in time-travelling and drug-induced revelations as plot devices, but when a whole extended edition became one long muddle of non-reality, it took away a lot of the enjoyment. Although the latest episode is an improvement on the last two, I'm getting fed up with the blurring of different "realities" and cheap tricks like the undead Mary, and as you say, I watched it for the editting and production values, not for the story.

    Re spoilers: some of us are not in BBC-land and have to wait for each episode to become available, so I for one appreciate the spoiler tags, at least in the first few messages after the latest episode airs so that I know when to stop reading this thread! :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 346 ✭✭reason vs religion


    Penn wrote: »
    I've heard it said that a great mystery is one where you get all the pieces throughout the story but it's only at the end that you see how they all fit together. A bad mystery is one where you just get all the pieces at the end practically already put together.

    In fairness to Sherlock, the pieces about Sherlock's sister were there. The same actress playing all three roles (which I never copped), the repeated hints about something happening in his childhood which pointed to another brother (but like the first time Sherlock met John and thought his brother gave him his phone, it was a sister), "Miss Me?" being from his sister rather than Moriarty...

    The pieces were there. The big mystery at the end was all the pieces we'd be given being put together as opposed to a shock surprise ending for the sake of it.

    I thought it was done brilliantly.

    I'm reading elsewhere about all the clues contained within the series: Sherlock assuming Watson had a brother in the first episode, the mention of an east wind coming, Mycroft using gender neutral terms, etc. But these don't strike me as clues! I'm calling for clues whose meanings can be debated, not ones whose existence is the centre of the debate. I'd love to make a compilation of similarly minor details that turn out to be utterly irrelevant.

    Also, a gripe about Eurus: she didn't exactly need to be a master of disguise to conceal herself from Watson, who'd never met her, or from Sherlock, who it would seem has not met her since childhood. And she also has the fortune to look uncannily like Smith's daughter!


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,847 ✭✭✭764dak


    The season seems interesting.


  • Registered Users Posts: 535 ✭✭✭dogsears


    Was there meant to be some significance to the way Culverton Smith kept asking people how long they had worked for him with a really sinister look on his face? If it was just meant to intimidate them then so be it, I could see that, but it seemed like there was more to it than that, and if there was I didn't get what it was.


  • Registered Users Posts: 43,852 ✭✭✭✭Basq


    dogsears wrote: »
    Was there meant to be some significance to the way Culverton Smith kept asking people how long they had worked for him with a really sinister look on his face?  If it was just meant to intimidate them then so be it, I could see that, but it seemed like there was more to it than that, and if there was I didn't get what it was.
    At first, I remember thinking it was related to the ward that Sherlock was being detained in.

    Culverton asked two people (Nurse Cornish when with the group of kids and Saheed in the mortuary) who said 7 and 4 years respectively. But ward was indicated as 73. So that's out.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 4,978 Mod ✭✭✭✭GoldFour4


    I'd imagine it was some form of blackmail? I.e how long have you been working here and known that I have the run of the place and my set of keys and access to the mortuary?


  • Registered Users Posts: 33,446 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Yeah I kinda saw it as a "Don't you know who I am? I can have you fired" sort of threat.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,854 ✭✭✭Ceist_Beag


    Basq wrote: »
    At first, I remember thinking it was related to the ward that Sherlock was being detained in.

    Culverton asked two people (Nurse Cornish when with the group of kids and Saheed in the mortuary) who said 7 and 4 years respectively. But ward was indicated as 73. So that's out.

    Seriously Basq, you're taking in this level of detail while watching the show? Even if the ward was 74 what would the point of that be - that Smith would decide which ward to put him in based on the answers he got - instead of putting him in the room which had a hidden entrance? I get that people are always looking for hidden meanings in this show but I think you're overthinking this one tbh!


  • Registered Users Posts: 43,852 ✭✭✭✭Basq


    ^ Didn't say I wasn't overthinking it.. but to be honest, Culverton asking it the first time was one thing, but asking someone else the exact same thing.. it could have easily been hinting at something.

    At the end of season 3, Mycroft uttered "an east wind is coming"... it only took 3 years to pay off as to what that actually meant.

    Over the years, I've learnt Sherlock is a multi-faceted show and you can often ignore insignificant details that have a bigger meaning. Of course with that, obviously sometimes you can overthink things.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,320 ✭✭✭jasonb


    And don't forget that some of the 'clues' are also nods to the books. 'An east wind is coming' is from the last (as least chronologically) short story, based just before World War 1, when the 'east wind coming' was from Europe and the approaching war.

    They used it again here as a nod to the books, and then added the extra layer of the name of Sherlock's sister.

    J.


  • Registered Users Posts: 394 ✭✭thisistough


    Basq wrote: »
    At the end of season 3, Mycroft uttered "an east wind is coming"... it only took 3 years to pay off

    I think it was John said that, otherwise Mycroft would have known what he was saying wouldn't he?


  • Registered Users Posts: 766 ✭✭✭MICKEYG


    I think it was John said that, otherwise Mycroft would have known what he was saying wouldn't he?

    Sorry folks, unsure of the insignificance of the phrase "There is an east wind coming". Can you elaborate?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,105 ✭✭✭drugstore cowboy


    The series made me buy the complete Sherlock Holmes stories and I am hooked! I feel ashamed it took me so long to get into the printed tales. Better late than never I guess!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 640 ✭✭✭Turtle_


    MICKEYG wrote: »
    Sorry folks, unsure of the insignificance of the phrase "There is an east wind coming". Can you elaborate?

    Eurus /euros means East wind


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,320 ✭✭✭jasonb


    MICKEYG wrote: »
    Sorry folks, unsure of the insignificance of the phrase "There is an east wind coming". Can you elaborate?

    Eurus is the name of Sherlock's sister, and it's a Greek word that is the name of the Greek god of the East Wind.

    I think it was Sherlock who actually said (in the Series 3 finale) 'the east wind takes us all in the end' and he said it was a phrase/story that Mycroft used to tell him when they were younger.

    J.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 43,852 ✭✭✭✭Basq


    Uh-oh!

    EDIT: Russian audio... bollocks anyways!


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,674 ✭✭✭✭MisterAnarchy


    Hopefully the last episode is a huge improvement on the first 2 episodes of series 4 ,as they were very poor episodes.

    The show is running on fumes at this stage ,its become a parody of itself.
    The writers are so far up their own arse at this stage its not funny.
    How many more times are they going to jump the shark.

    I was expecting the Culverton Smith episode to be good but it was a mess.
    The character of Culverton Smith was like something out of Scooby Doo ,Toby Jones was really hamming it up .
    What was with those ridiculous teeth ?

    If the next episode is to be the final episode ever then I am glad as the last 2 series have been very poor bar the odd episode.
    It is hard to believe that the fluffy nonsense being served since the beginning of series three was written by the same people who wrote the brilliant first two series.
    Mc Guigan has been a big loss as director too ,his direction in the first 2 series was very tight .


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,992 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    Mc Guigan has been a big loss as director too ,his direction in the first 2 series was very tight .
    He executive produced the Luke Cage series on Netflix and directed a couple of episodes. You can see a couple of familiar effects if you look close enough, especially with Misty Knight detection scenes.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,847 ✭✭✭764dak


    I heard that that is supposedly teasing that there will be 4 episodes this season as opposed to the usual 3!

    My digital TV guide describes the third episode of season four as the season finale. It comes on PBS where I'm from.


  • Registered Users Posts: 43,852 ✭✭✭✭Basq


    Yep, 3 episodes as per usual.. latest comments from showrunners say it *may* be the last ever episode.


  • Registered Users Posts: 783 ✭✭✭jockeyboard


    OMG


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,399 ✭✭✭✭ThunbergsAreGo


    That explosion was hilarious


  • Site Banned Posts: 72 ✭✭Mr Whom


    This is fair gibberish.


  • Site Banned Posts: 72 ✭✭Mr Whom


    More plot holes than a truck load of Swiss cheese


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 10,399 ✭✭✭✭ThunbergsAreGo


    Sawlock Holmes


Advertisement