Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

2004, and people are smoking in my local ?

2»

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,797 ✭✭✭Paddy20


    And what date is mentioned for the introduction of the smoking ban ?..or is that not of any relevance now, because I was right ?:rolleyes:

    P.:ninja:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 208 ✭✭L4


    Monday 26th January 2004.

    And what were you right about? That smoking is bad for you!? Well done.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,797 ✭✭✭Paddy20


    Quote; Our Minister of Health, " I intend to introduce the ban from January 1st 2004 "

    Now L4, go back to school or college where you just might get some badly needed education and [who knows!, maybe the decency required to admit it, when you are wrong!.:rolleyes:

    I know our current government Ministers are not exactly perfect role models, but that is no reason for you to follow them.

    P.:ninja:


  • Registered Users Posts: 857 ✭✭✭Corega


    Originally posted by James R
    Yeah Jan 26th was the earliest and good enough too. Sick of ignorant people blowing smoke into my face.

    Rob Reiner has become a member of boards!

    I'm not ignorant btw, I just want to make your life that little bit more miserable.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 208 ✭✭L4


    Originally posted by Paddy20
    Quote; Our Minister of Health, " I intend to introduce the ban from January 1st 2004 "

    Now L4, go back to school or college where you just might get some badly needed education and [who knows!, maybe the decency required to admit it, when you are wrong!.:rolleyes:

    I know our current government Ministers are not exactly perfect role models, but that is no reason for you to follow them.

    Gimp.:ninja:

    :rolleyes:
    What did I say? Huh? 26th, repeat after me, twenty sixth.
    You can qoute all you like, who is right? Me, that's who. Just
    because you read it somewhere doesn't make it cold hard fact.
    I remember the Minister's speach, signed to law to come into
    effect JAN 26th 2004. Subject to possible delays, get a grip man,
    go back to reading the Sun einsteen.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,797 ✭✭✭Paddy20


    L4,

    You should join a political party. You are obviously well qualified already for becoming a politician, and this Country could really do with more like you. God help us!.:eek:

    P.:ninja:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 208 ✭✭L4


    What do you base this theory on? All that I suggested you do is read your tabloids and/or grow up. I think your nuts tbh. You probably believe everything you've ever read, I feel sorry for you.


  • Registered Users Posts: 857 ✭✭✭Corega


    Originally posted by L4
    einsteen.

    Einstein*
    Originally posted by L4
    speach

    speech*


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 489 ✭✭Faust


    Originally posted by Corega
    Einstein*



    speech*

    nice one :D


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 489 ✭✭Faust


    Hey l4 how about you make one post that does'nt involve insulting people and provoking them into replying to your inane opinions?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 208 ✭✭L4


    Originally posted by Corega
    Einstein*



    speech*

    I realise speech was spelled incorrectly, however I intended to write Einsteen, copied from American T.V to my shame.


  • Registered Users Posts: 450 ✭✭krinpit


    Originally posted by Faust
    joke ( P ) Pronunciation Key (jk)
    n.
    Something said or done to evoke laughter or amusement, especially an amusing story with a punch line.
    A mischievous trick; a prank.
    An amusing or ludicrous incident or situation.
    Informal.
    Something not to be taken seriously; a triviality: The accident was no joke.
    An object of amusement or laughter; a laughingstock: His loud tie was the joke of the office.

    Easy now, I don't wanna hurt nobody! Touché :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,778 ✭✭✭✭Kold


    Originally posted by Paddy20
    DMT,

    Yes, Micheal Martin & Bertie Ahern. Oh, the irony!. I think the E.U. is magic.

    Hmmm, why do I not feel sorry for all those anti - smoking fanatics who swore blind that the new smoking ban would be introduced on 1st January 2004.

    Yes, true democracy, has some real benefits for the little man.

    P.:) :ninja:
    I'm getting you a Primary school english text book for your birthday


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 489 ✭✭Faust


    Originally posted by Kold
    I'm getting you a Primary school english text book for your birthday

    I hate pedants :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,608 ✭✭✭✭sceptre


    Originally posted by Faust
    I hate pedants :D
    Oh you lie. Buy yourself one of these (I got it for Christmas - there's an entire chapter about when to use (and when not to use) a comma)


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 17,994 Mod ✭✭✭✭ixoy


    An entire chapter on the comma? I hate commas! Bloody subordinate clauses. Bloody using a bloody comma to seperate the last item in a bloody list - except only in the US! GRRR! Stupid things.

    However, I advocate death for mixing "your" and "you're" :p


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,267 ✭✭✭Exit


    Getting slightly back on topic, I just saw a report about smoking in pubs being banned on Sky News. They mentioned that Ireland is planning on banning it, and what clip do they show in their report? Someone pouring a pint of Guinness with diddlyeye music in the background :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users Posts: 450 ✭✭krinpit


    Originally posted by Exit
    Getting slightly back on topic, I just saw a report about smoking in pubs being banned on Sky News. They mentioned that Ireland is planning on banning it, and what clip do they show in their report? Someone pouring a pint of Guinness with diddlyeye music in the background :rolleyes:

    You don't like Guinness or Diddlyeye music? :eek: :eek: :eek: My God and be Jayzuz, what kind of an Irish person are you at all, at all?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,797 ✭✭✭Paddy20


    Kold,

    Quote; " I'm getting you a Primary school text book for your birthday " end quote.

    Thats nice, but why wait until my birthday. Obviously, I need it now ?..

    Send me a PM and I will let you have my address.:D

    Looking forward to hearing from you.

    P.:ninja:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,924 ✭✭✭✭BuffyBot


    Originally posted by Exit
    Getting slightly back on topic, I just saw a report about smoking in pubs being banned on Sky News. They mentioned that Ireland is planning on banning it, and what clip do they show in their report? Someone pouring a pint of Guinness with diddlyeye music in the background :rolleyes:

    I think they even said it had come into effect already


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 28,128 ✭✭✭✭Mossy Monk


    yes they did

    that's accurate reporting :D:D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,435 ✭✭✭weemcd


    Excuse me mr scrooge, i believe you intended to write this before you even went out on new years eve, do you really have that little to do that on new years eve you were complaining about people smoking?, yes the ban was meant to be inforced, but where is your festive spirit or goodwill? i myself hate smoking, but it is very narrow minded and ignorant (in the true sense of the word) for you to believe this would be an overnight change, that at the joyfull and jubilent time when the count down goes from 10 to 1 ringing in the new year, people were to stop and stub out their ciggarettes? in my honnest opinion people have more on their mind at this time than new anti smoking legislation. so give it time please


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,797 ✭✭✭Paddy20


    weemcd,

    Excuse me, but who is the Mr Scrooge your post is directed at ?..

    If it is meant for me, may I recommend that you read my first post. Especially where I wish those still being allowed to smoke unhindered the best of luck !.

    You see I have always regarded this ban on smoking in the workplace as poorly thought out and unenforcable, particularly for traditional smoking environments such as my local Pub.

    The Minister of Health has been shown up for what he is, he has also been forced to back down on a number of fronts by the EU, and that includes banning smoking in places of entertainment for the moment pending further investigation concerning the strong possibility that this ban could be an illegal infringement of smokers civil rights. So who knows when or if it will be introduced.

    imho the Minister of Health should resign, not only over this issue but also over his mishandling of our Health services.

    P.:ninja:


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Originally posted by Paddy20

    pending further investigation concerning the strong possibility that this ban could be an illegal infringement of smokers civil rights.

    Could you provide a link to your source for this Paddy?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,797 ✭✭✭Paddy20


    Man,

    Now,now. I am sure you have plenty of links of your own to this story where our Minister of Health & Bertie both had to eat thier words along with the implementation date because of EU intervention on the grounds stated.

    Now, I have to rush out shopping. I will check back later.

    Happy New Year to you & yours.

    P.;) :ninja:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,307 ✭✭✭richindub2


    Smokers shouldnt have civil rights. If theyre idiotic enough to smoke in the first place then they sure as hell arent going to be able to vote responsibly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,924 ✭✭✭✭BuffyBot


    Originally posted by richindub2
    Smokers shouldnt have civil rights. If theyre idiotic enough to smoke in the first place then they sure as hell arent going to be able to vote responsibly.

    Jesus, what a stupid comment.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 489 ✭✭Faust


    Well why do smokers start smoking exactly when they know its lethal?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,810 ✭✭✭DRakE


    Originally posted by richindub2
    Smokers shouldnt have civil rights. If theyre idiotic enough to smoke in the first place then they sure as hell arent going to be able to vote responsibly.

    I heartily endorse this product and / or service.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,175 ✭✭✭✭Sangre


    Originally posted by richindub2
    Smokers shouldnt have civil rights. If theyre idiotic enough to smoke in the first place then they sure as hell arent going to be able to vote responsibly.

    Couldnt agree more!

    There are warnings right there on the packet, how can you be so stupid? I think all smokers should be locked up in a tiny unventilated room with only one packet of cigarettes.Let them fight for it. Only one cranky smoker will be left who, hopefully, I would have the pleasurse of burning to death with cigarettes. That will teach him for burning my expenseive clothes.

    Maybe this smokers room can be in the same complex as the knacker slave labour camps....


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 17,994 Mod ✭✭✭✭ixoy


    Originally posted by Faust
    Well why do smokers start smoking exactly when they know its lethal?
    Because they're weak willed idiots :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,175 ✭✭✭✭Sangre


    Originally posted by ixoy
    Because they're weak willed idiots :)

    Who are clearly trying to look cool and are failing miserably


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Originally posted by Paddy20
    The Minister of Health has been shown up for what he is, he has also been forced to back down on a number of fronts by the EU, and that includes banning smoking in places of entertainment for the moment pending further investigation concerning the strong possibility that this ban could be an illegal infringement of smokers civil rights. So who knows when or if it will be introduced.

    imho the Minister of Health should resign, not only over this issue but also over his mishandling of our Health services.
    Paddy, you're not getting it here. Yes, the Minister rushed it a bit to get this legislation. That's why he had to revise it to exclude certain places - prisons, etc. When he did revise it, he stated that to allow these new restrictions extra preparation time, the legislation wouldn't be enforced until closer to February. All the links you've supplied, with him saying the 1st of January are out of date.

    There are also two parts of the Geneva convention, that, creatively interpreted, may override your 'civil right' to smoke.
    Article 23(1)
    Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment.
    Breathing cigarette smoke may not be favourable to a person in their place of employment.
    Article 25(1)
    Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, .....
    Again, If you have to work to maintain that standard of living, then that work should not be detrimental to your health.
    Article 29(2)
    In the exercise of his rights and freedoms, everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and the general welfare in a democratic society.
    Which essentially means that laws such as this one are nice and legal, since they don't wholly prevent you from smoking, only add some limitations, in the pursuit of meeting the just requirements of the general welfare of a democratic society.

    As I say, creative interpretation, but then again, you can use facts to prove anything :)

    Paddy, there is nothing anywhere, that says you have the right to ingest, inhale or inject any substance as a leisure pursuit, or even as a medicine. If there was, governments would have a tough time justifying most drug laws.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,797 ✭✭✭Paddy20


    seamus,

    I can understand where you are coming from. I also sincerely wish that the Geneva convention was respected and implemented by the powers that be, in the Republic of Ireland.

    However, I live in the real world in Donegal, where just about everthing in Article 23 (1), Article 25 (1) & Article 29 (1) are not respected or implemented properly or enforced. I truly wish they were.

    Taking this unfortunate fact into consideration, do you really believe that even if the Smoking Ban is introduced/if ever!. It will either be respected or enforced effectively ?..

    Imho there is not a hope in hell for the smoking ban in the workplace, and I suspect the Minister for Health & Bertie are at this moment trying to sweep it under the carpet in the hope that it will be forgotten about very soon.

    Thats just life in Ireland as it really is, and not as the Geneva convention would like it to be.

    P.:ninja:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 489 ✭✭Faust


    Originally posted by Sangre
    Who are clearly trying to look cool and are failing miserably
    smells like troll spirit


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,435 ✭✭✭weemcd


    this thread is getting out of control


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 450 ✭✭James R


    Originally posted by Sangre


    There are warnings right there on the packet, how can you be so stupid? I think all smokers should be locked up in a tiny unventilated room with only one packet of cigarettes.Let them fight for it. Only one cranky smoker will be left who, hopefully, I would have the pleasurse of burning to death with cigarettes. That will teach him for burning my expenseive clothes.

    Maybe this smokers room can be in the same complex as the knacker slave labour camps....

    Man you should work for RTE, this as a reality tv show would get far better ratings than House of Love :D


  • Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 21,504 Mod ✭✭✭✭Agent Smith


    yet again i am smoking...... and soon i wont be able to due to little hitler getting his way.....



    you know who i mean:mad:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,267 ✭✭✭Exit


    Who? Him?

    hitler.jpg


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 28,128 ✭✭✭✭Mossy Monk


    lol

    but seriously Micheál Martin :mad: :mad: :mad:

    asshole


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 489 ✭✭Faust


    Originally posted by Mossy Monk
    lol

    but seriously Micheál Martin :mad: :mad: :mad:

    asshole

    How dare he try to save peoples lives...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,423 ✭✭✭tinkerbell


    Originally posted by sceptre
    Oh you lie. Buy yourself one of these (I got it for Christmas - there's an entire chapter about when to use (and when not to use) a comma)

    Did ya read the reviews for that book:

    Reviews

    John Walsh, The Independent
    Eats, Shoots and Leaves makes the history of punctuation a subject at once urgent, sexy and hilarious...

    :rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 489 ✭✭Faust


    Originally posted by tinkerbell
    Did ya read the reviews for that book:

    Reviews

    John Walsh, The Independent
    Eats, Shoots and Leaves makes the history of punctuation a subject at once urgent, sexy and hilarious...

    :rolleyes:
    That must be a DAMN good book.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,490 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    http://home.eircom.net/content/irelandcom/breaking/2296741?view=Eircomnet
    Smoking ban won't lead to 'nanny state' - Ahern
    From:ireland.com
    Sunday, 4th January, 2004

    The fast-approaching smoking ban will not turn Ireland into a "nanny state", the Taoiseach, Mr Ahern, insisted today.

    He acknowledged that the workplace ban, which has been opposed by the hospitality sector, would be hard for smokers but urged them to adhere to the law.

    "I just ask smokers in particular to understand that it is for the greater good," he said.

    "I know that it's inconvenient and I know it's hard. I've never been a smoker so I don't understand totally the difficulty for them but it's an issue for the health of all the people."

    He added: "I don't want this to turn into a nanny state where people send inspectors in to see if people drink or people smoke but I think people understand that there's a good reason for this law and I ask people to comply with it fully."

    Mr Ahern confirmed that the ban would apply to every pub and restaurant in every area and will be enforced next month.
    http://home.eircom.net/content/irelandcom/topstories/2291889?view=Eircomnet
    Grounds for banning smoking in stadiums
    From:ireland.com
    Saturday, 3rd January, 2004
    BUSINESS OF SPORT/Daire Whelan:

    While we wait (some with bated breath) for the introduction of the smoking ban, isn't it about time smoking was banned at sports grounds as well?

    How many times have you sat/stood in Croke Park or Lansdowne Road and had the misfortune of someone's cigarette smoke blowing into your face? It may be outdoors but sports stadiums are still enclosed spaces for the fans and stewards. But, it seems many in Irish sports organisations feel that having a smoking ban in their grounds is a step too far. Likewise for the Department of Health, Fine Gael and Labour.

    Only last October the Minister for Health, Michéal Martin, stated: "The primary purpose in introducing this important new health measure is to allow people to work and socialise in clean, healthy smoke-free environments. No one can be in any doubt that exposure to and inhalation of environmental tobacco smoke is a cause of cancer, heart disease and respiratory disease."

    Stewards must work in stadiums and fans go to matches to socialise as well as support their team, so why do sports grounds not come under the proposed ban as well? As it stands "the regulations on smoke-free workplaces will include indoor workplaces only" and furthermore the Department of Health says "there are no plans to extend the smoke-free workplace initiative to outdoor workplaces".

    But surely then, people smoking in sports grounds constitutes a health risk to those sitting near them and to those working near them? To which the Department of Health says: "Tobacco smoke is the most significant form of indoor air pollution. In an outdoor setting tobacco smoke may be quickly dispersed and does not pose the same levels of exposure and risk as an indoor location, although it can be annoying if sitting beside a smoker during a game."

    Annoying. You can say that again. So you can either put up or shut up. But no, there's more, the Department also has the following advice: "Smoke-free locations are always a more pleasant environment. Most people attending sports events don't smoke and many smokers if requested by those sitting around them will not smoke."

    So while the Department of Health has delusions about the behavioural habits of sports fans, the reality for the rest of us is very different. Have you ever asked a supporter smoking nearby to desist? Wouldn't you be more fearful of consequences suffered from your request? Don't hold your breath for any changes to be introduced in the near future either. Asked as to whether there are any plans from the Minister, or has it ever been suggested to the Minister, to introduce a smoking ban at sports grounds, this column was told: "Sports and sports grounds and venues are associated with physical exercise, a healthy lifestyle and high fitness levels. Some people would consider it preferable if smoking, which is the unhealthiest thing a human can do, should not be allowed in such venues."

    Some people? In this case does "some people" not include the Government and the Minister for Health, who reminds us "exposure to and inhalation of environmental tobacco smoke is a cause of cancer, heart disease and respiratory disease?"

    Maybe it's my old age, but is it just me or am I detecting the notion sports fans are getting the short end of the stick here?

    Everyone else in sport, it seems, will only move when the Government does. An IRFU spokesman said there are no restrictions on smoking in the open-air areas of Lansdowne Road. However, it is banned in committee rooms and internal rooms around the stadium and has been in place for the last few years. The IRFU will be adhering to the Government recommendations when they are introduced and as for future developments they will be monitoring the evolution of and development of the smoking ban.

    The eircom League has confirmed there are no regulations or guidelines in place for sports grounds regarding smoking. The ban will affect club bars while one option in the future could be the introduction of special family areas with no smoking sections.

    The GAA and its county boards confirmed they too will be adhering to the Government recommendations. But, for Croke Park's hospitality boxes, there will be no smoking where drink is served. It is only the plebeians who must run the risk of cancer in the cheaper seats. However, there does still seem to be some confusion as to the application of the law when it comes into force, as the Dublin County Board told this column as Parnell Park is an enclosed space with kids and stewards present, non-smoking in the ground will be enforced.

    So why such unwillingness from most quarters to ban smoking from sports stadiums across the country? Maybe, when you get past the language of "grey areas", "enforcement" and "rules and regulations" the primary reason could be a potential drop in attendances if any smoking ban were to be introduced? Is there a revenue factor that is being conveniently ignored? We may hide behind health reasons and open-air excuses but perhaps the battle with sporting organisations is one the Government is not ready for. After all, the publicans are proving to be stubborn enough as it is.

    Next week, this column gets the views of opposition spokespersons on smoking at sports grounds, hears medical opinion on the dangers for fans, and examines why more and more Premiership clubs in England are banning smoking from their stadiums.


  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional South East Moderators Posts: 28,510 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cabaal


    Originally posted by bazH
    Another 3 months with headaches and watery eyes :(

    Your telling me, I was with a big group of people in a local pub on Sat night, we all packed up and moved pubds because the smoke was so bad, I wouldn't mind but two of the people were smokers and they even agreed with us. :)
    Originally posted by Paddy20
    How long before the fanatical anti- farting campaigners start up ?..

    You've just done it, you've made up my mind
    Your posts now mean nothing to me
    what are you six years old?
    :rolleyes: :rolleyes:


  • Advertisement
Advertisement