Duke of York BBC Interview

Lisha wrote: »

I think he’s a complete perverted liar by the way. As someone else says in thread no wonder Megan Markle isn’t having Christmas with the royals.. Megan might be the most genuine of them all after all

Why?

curious, hence asking-

I didn't get he was lying about Virginia tonight, unless he's in total denial and is now believing his own lies, but I just didn't get he was lying from the interview.

I know people will disagree with me but i'm not really into trial by media anyway regardless of who it is- he is completely self-centered and lacking any degree of what is ethically right and wrong - that i did get from the interview this evening, before people completely stone me to death:D

Pizza Express Woking will be busy when they re-open


https://www.tripadvisor.ie/Restaurant_Review-g580430-d730973-Reviews-Pizza_Express-Woking_Surrey_England.html

"The "Alibi Special" pizza was absolutely marvelous although others have complained it's hard to stomach and has too much cheese."


I would like everyone to know I was here on 13th March for a birthday party.

The pizza was great and they treated my daughter like a real princess

I had a table downstairs (I have never been upstairs)

I will never forget eating there (After being reminded by butler)

I can honestly say the food was fit for a (Nearly) king

Much better than going to Tramps as I can never find the bar there

You would have thought that the "faked photo" issue could be resolved very easily if Virginia could just find a few people whom she showed the photo, after it was developed, back in 2001, and for them to make a statement that they did indeed see this very photo back then.It wasn't a digital photo, it was a film camera photo.

She took it after all, to show her mother. So is her mother still alive, or maybe some neighbours, or friends?

While I didn't see anything conclusive either way on the Virginia Roberts allegations:

1. He was definitely in London at the time the photo was taken and alleged encounter with Virginia- and it's not inconceivable that he could have attended Pizza Express in the early evening AND Tramps nite-club later that night. He wasn't pressed on this aspect in the interview, which was disappointing- going to a Nite club and going to a Pizza restaurant are activities typically undertaken at different times of the day- Doh!

2. He was also in the Boston area at the time of the second allegation - again, it wasn't beyond the bounds of possibility that he could have made it back to New York- it was a feeble denial i thought. It wasn't clear from the interview as to where he was in relation to the 3rd allegation that occurred on Epstein's island- I'm not sure if there's a specific date for this allegation.


3. He provided such a strange rambling answer using terms such as "positive action" as to why he couldn't possibly forget any of his sexual conquests, so as he can't remember having sex with Virginia Roberts, then it just couldn't possibly have happened- I felt this was one of many bizarre answers he gave, and it didn't give me any reassurance as to what the truth is.

Nothing that he said last night, "clears" him- as a result, he was ill-advised to take part - the only reason he should have done this interview is if he has absolute proof he couldn't have done what's alleged. However, he's still "innocent" under the eyes of the law- we've seen the disaster and destruction caused in the UK of public allegations without foundation and a proper court trial- Cliff Richard, Paul Gambaccini, Lord Janner, etc