Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Family saloon for under €12K

2»

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,958 ✭✭✭✭Shefwedfan


    JayZeus wrote: »
    Real world about 9.5L/100km on a 3800km European trip. Heavy car and not particularly nice to drive. 2015 2L petrol auto version. Good on paper, crap in the real world.

    Look a little more and ignore the people too busy trying to convince the world that they make a smart purchasing decision and you’ll find a lot of similar reports. I’d give it 5/10 in all regards.


    Not really a car I would be buying if I was doing 3800km across Europe....diesel is your man


    How was it on short journeys on battery alone? which is what OP will use it for


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,355 ✭✭✭Belfast


    2014 (142) Skoda Superb 1.4 TSI S 125PS 5DR
    €9,900 Price: €9,900
    Odometer: 106,576 miles /
    171,513 km
    d43864c90df075c94489ddbe4ca5ffe9ff279ea1dddffedb7fb993ec1e19f279.jpg
    https://www.carsireland.ie/detail.php?ad_id=2343087&r=s.php%3Fm%5B%5D%3D80%26o%5B%5D%3D683%26e%3D12000%26f%3D1%26t%3D1%26g%3D0


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,958 ✭✭✭✭Shefwedfan


    colm_mcm wrote: »
    It’s where all the owners are, for sure. Same as if someone has a Superb vs Mondeo question, would you direct them to Briskoda.com or talkford.net or whatever? Not if they needed an unbiased opinion.


    I don’t agree with segregating electric cars from the main forums, it just encourages groupthink, and anyone with a differing opinion is pounced upon.
    I think electric cars warrant discussion, and that it’s handy to have the threads all in one place, but we didn’t create a diesel subforum 10 years ago. The EV forum was created for the wrong reasons in my opinion.


    I agree....electric/PHEV etc is just a fuel....same as diesel/petrol. I have no idea why a seperate forum was created. I think it should all be in the one....better open discussion then


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,958 ✭✭✭✭Shefwedfan


    bear1 wrote: »
    I'd agree with that.
    There also seems to be animosity between those that own ev/phevs and those that don't.
    I'm party to that sometimes but it does get tiring seeing people suggest cars, both electric/hybrid or diesel/petrol wljust because it suits the person posting it more.


    Which is what you done??



    The OP posted they drive short distances and that they liked the idea of PHEV....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,823 ✭✭✭✭bear1


    Shefwedfan wrote: »
    Which is what you done??



    The OP posted they drive short distances and that they liked the idea of PHEV....

    I just admitted it?


  • Posts: 3,637 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Shefwedfan wrote: »
    Not really a car I would be buying if I was doing 3800km across Europe....diesel is your man


    How was it on short journeys on battery alone? which is what OP will use it for

    The point which you are absolutely ignoring, is that it is not in any way a fuel efficient hybrid, measured against others. It wasn't bought for the purpose of the trip. The point is that over a two week trip covering the whole gamut of different roads, terrain and traffic, it returned a consumption rate of 9.5L/100km. Which is obvious to everyone else, but I'm happy to explain it to you if you didn't understand it first time. It was also noisy. Whiney transmission and not capable of higher speeds in any degree of comfort.

    How was it on short journeys? :rolleyes: It's 'meh' on short journeys. 25km on a charge.

    I love the way you recommend a car you have no experience with and then argue with someone who has some. Stop trying to score points arguing from a point of zero experience while giving somebody a bum steer on where to spend their money.

    €12k spent on an Outlander with the intention of selling it in 2 years isn't a good move. Ignore anyone who tries to tell you otherwise. Go with a low tax, lower mileage petrol family car with a decent spec and leave the Outlanders for people trying to buy champagne with too little in their pocket. They'll be ending up with apple cider vinegar and telling you it tastes just like Bollinger.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,958 ✭✭✭✭Shefwedfan


    JayZeus wrote: »
    The point which you are absolutely ignoring, is that it is not in any way a fuel efficient hybrid, measured against others. It wasn't bought for the purpose of the trip. The point is that over a two week trip covering the whole gamut of different roads, terrain and traffic, it returned a consumption rate of 9.5L/100km. Which is obvious to everyone else, but I'm happy to explain it to you if you didn't understand it first time. It was also noisy. Whiney transmission and not capable of higher speeds in any degree of comfort.

    How was it on short journeys? :rolleyes: It's 'meh' on short journeys. 25km on a charge.

    I love the way you recommend a car you have no experience with and then argue with someone who has some. Stop trying to score points arguing from a point of zero experience while giving somebody a bum steer on where to spend their money.

    €12k spent on an Outlander with the intention of selling it in 2 years isn't a good move. Ignore anyone who tries to tell you otherwise. Go with a low tax, lower mileage petrol family car with a decent spec and leave the Outlanders for people trying to buy champagne with too little in their pocket. They'll be ending up with apple cider vinegar and telling you it tastes just like Bollinger.

    Interesting to know what you tested it against? You mentioned you measured it against others?

    Also no mention of what you used it for? Was it alway off battery? Or you keep it in range of battery and the odd time using petrol?

    I’m not sure what’s obvious to everyone else but not to me so can you explain?


  • Posts: 3,637 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Shefwedfan wrote: »
    Interesting to know what you tested it against? You mentioned you measured it against others?

    Also no mention of what you used it for? Was it alway off battery? Or you keep it in range of battery and the odd time using petrol?

    I’m not sure what’s obvious to everyone else but not to me so can you explain?

    I've done all the explaining I'll be doing for you.

    Edited for clarity: I don't mean that to be offensive, simply that I'm not interested in entertaining your questions any longer on this subject. I've provided my input, stood over it and it's based on real world experience with the car you recommended. I disagree with the recommendation strongly and I've already explained why. So now, I'll leave you to it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,105 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    bear1 wrote: »
    I seem to have touched a nerve here.
    You see quite often someone posts about buying a new car or just a car in general and needs it to be this that and the other and you're almost guaranteed someone will come on and say buy a leaf cause even though you can go max 200km and take an hour at a time to charge it up but it's great cause it doesn't cause pollution and it's perfect for your 5km trip per day.
    Anyway, just my own opinion.

    Touched a nerve ?

    I've two diesels out in the garden for long commutes. No nerve touched here.


    Your brown corolla was a depressing place in life. Jesus is that it...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,489 ✭✭✭bennyineire


    Thanks for all the input and discussion peeps, it's great to see the debate on different fuel types. I'm not wedded to any fuel type but would prefer not to go diesel.

    Again just looking for someting that I can sell/trade in 2 years time that will hold its value. BTW I will have a fuel card from work


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,958 ✭✭✭✭Shefwedfan


    JayZeus wrote: »
    I've done all the explaining I'll be doing for you.

    Edited for clarity: I don't mean that to be offensive, simply that I'm not interested in entertaining your questions any longer on this subject. I've provided my input, stood over it and it's based on real world experience with the car you recommended. I disagree with the recommendation strongly and I've already explained why. So now, I'll leave you to it.

    Not sure what the aggressive posting is about?

    From your post and description it sound like you bought a PHEV for the wrong type of driving. The main benefit of the PHEV is trying to drive as much as possible in battery mode and also it’s a car which is more suited to city driving than constantly on the motorway

    The OP has a requirement to drive lots of short 5km trips which will all be on the battery. In the odd situation he needs to go further the petrol will kick in so no need to use those pesky charge points....

    If you buy a PHEV to hammer it along the motorway day in day out then your buying the wrong vehicle, get yourself a diesel for that job

    I don’t see how you have stood over anything to be honest, you quoted some vague numbers about 3800 km across Europe and high ltr/100km but in same post says it will do 25km on battery.

    I think it’s a fairly easy question in regards to the outlander mostly running on battery mode or was it mostly running off petrol?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,958 ✭✭✭✭Shefwedfan


    Thanks for all the input and discussion peeps, it's great to see the debate on different fuel types. I'm not wedded to any fuel type but would prefer not to go diesel.

    Again just looking for someting that I can sell/trade in 2 years time that will hold its value. BTW I will have a fuel card from work

    If you have fuel card does that mean you get vat off diesel?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,958 ✭✭✭✭Shefwedfan


    Thanks for all the input and discussion peeps, it's great to see the debate on different fuel types. I'm not wedded to any fuel type but would prefer not to go diesel.

    Again just looking for someting that I can sell/trade in 2 years time that will hold its value. BTW I will have a fuel card from work

    Anything petrol/hybrid/PHEV/electric seems to be the way to go, the closer to full BEV the better

    The tax is only going one way on diesel from the reports. It’s seems the common train of thought is being diesel in line with petrol so that’s an extra 10 c per ltr, but all guess work

    If you look at the world market that’s the way it’s going. Ireland is still buying diesel, mostly dumped here from the UK as the value has dropped over those. Will that last? I don’t know

    Best bet at the moment is move away from diesel....could I be wrong, of course


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,489 ✭✭✭bennyineire


    Shefwedfan wrote: »
    Anything petrol/hybrid/PHEV/electric seems to be the way to go, the closer to full BEV the better

    The tax is only going one way on diesel from the reports. It’s seems the common train of thought is being diesel in line with petrol so that’s an extra 10 c per ltr, but all guess work

    If you look at the world market that’s the way it’s going. Ireland is still buying diesel, mostly dumped here from the UK as the value has dropped over those. Will that last? I don’t know

    Best bet at the moment is move away from diesel....could I be wrong, of course

    Not likely, diesels day is done. It's the easiest way for all Governments in the world to reduce emissions and everyone is expecting it. A free hit for the Government TBH


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,958 ✭✭✭✭Shefwedfan


    Not likely, diesels day is done. It's the easiest way for all Governments in the world to reduce emissions and everyone is expecting it. A free hit for the Government TBH


    The government answer to everything is tax


    Diesel is now bad and is currently earning 10c less a ltr, so expect them to bring that up. No chance they would reduce petrol to the diesel tax level.



    I was in VW recently, even the VW dealer said for my driving I need a hybrid but best he could sell was a straight petrol Tiguan Allspace.....I have bought a lot of VW/Audi over my life and I nearly dropped when they didn't push me into a diesel.....just shows you the way the market is going when VW are saying to go petrol


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,477 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    VW dealers want to sell cars, they’ll sell whatever they’re given.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,958 ✭✭✭✭Shefwedfan


    colm_mcm wrote: »
    VW dealers want to sell cars, they’ll sell whatever they’re given.

    Check the stock of diesel in VW Liffey valley


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,489 ✭✭✭bennyineire




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,477 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    It was outdated in 2008!

    They are reliable at least, a few family members had them. They are way off the pace of other 2016 cars, but if you put simplicity over refinement, style and technology then they’re not a bad shout considering tax is only €280, no turbo to worry about etc.
    it would kill me to pay that much for such a mediocre car. You might as well get a brown Corolla!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,489 ✭✭✭bennyineire


    This brown Corrola could become a meme for the motor forum, if its not already lol


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,958 ✭✭✭✭Shefwedfan


    This brown Corrola could become a meme for the motor forum, if its not already lol

    Someone will love it

    Yes the colour is bad....the fact the seller has a ass cushion and doesn’t want to take pictures of the inside says it all....


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,449 ✭✭✭✭pwurple


    Just on the outlander, while we do like ours, a word of warning, while the fuel and tax savings are there, the service costs are up there with the fossil cars (obvious given the fuel in it I suppose). Our last EV service was 90 euro, the PHEV was over 500.


    Tax on EV is 120. PHEV is 160.
    That lancer is 280 tax? Servicing probably 400?

    Tax plus servicing
    EV 210
    PHEV 660
    Lancer 680

    Not much saving in it really... if the decision is PHEV Vs petrol.

    For 25km a day, I don't know why you would go with anything other than an EV (or even bicycle!). Looks like a no brainer to me.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,958 ✭✭✭✭Shefwedfan


    pwurple wrote: »
    Just on the outlander, while we do like ours, a word of warning, while the fuel and tax savings are there, the service costs are up there with the fossil cars (obvious given the fuel in it I suppose). Our last EV service was 90 euro, the PHEV was over 500.


    Tax on EV is 120. PHEV is 160.
    That lancer is 280 tax? Servicing probably 400?

    Tax plus servicing
    EV 210
    PHEV 660
    Lancer 680

    Not much saving in it really... if the decision is PHEV Vs petrol.

    For 25km a day, I don't know why you would go with anything other than an EV (or even bicycle!). Looks like a no brainer to me.

    Why was the PHEV 500 for service?

    Was this standard service?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,449 ✭✭✭✭pwurple


    Yes, standard service, didn't take any of their optional extras like battery conditioning etc. PHEVs are a combo, so you end up servicing both the combustion system with all it's oil, coolants, and other dirty systems like that , as well as the electric system, and the additional integration system which links the two together. That is the main downside of any PHEV, the servicing complexity.

    Don't get me wrong, we like the car, the size is very handy when you've got 4 bikes, a dog, beach gear, and a family to jam into it, and you can't afford the Tesla equiv. The type of driving we do (90% of our trips are ~30km) means we only need to put petrol in once or twice a year... But our pure EV is still way ahead for cost effectiveness due to the few hundred a year saved on servicing. There isn't that much saving over petrol at low mileage between an efficient petrol and a PHEV, compared to the EV.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,059 ✭✭✭kirving


    pwurple wrote: »
    Just on the outlander, while we do like ours, a word of warning, while the fuel and tax savings are there, the service costs are up there with the fossil cars (obvious given the fuel in it I suppose). Our last EV service was 90 euro, the PHEV was over 500.


    Tax on EV is 120. PHEV is 160.
    That lancer is 280 tax? Servicing probably 400?

    Tax plus servicing
    EV 210
    PHEV 660
    Lancer 680

    Not much saving in it really... if the decision is PHEV Vs petrol.

    For 25km a day, I don't know why you would go with anything other than an EV (or even bicycle!). Looks like a no brainer to me.


    A standard service for my Diesel Hybrid is €180. What makes the PHEV cost €500? I would have my doubts about it being the basics only. It's a big car where parts wear more quickly so cost will be more, regardless of the fuel.

    I also don't think EV is necessarily the right choice if you only do 25k per day. Would cost about €900 in petrol, vs say €250 in electricity?

    €650 saving sure, but the benefits of a petrol are worth more than that to most people I would say. The sweet spot would be ~100k per day I think. Great savings vs ICE, not too long of a time spend in a small car.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,853 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    I’m assuming the point of a non Ev is for the odd few longer trips a year that have been mentioned. Assuming there is no appropriate second car in the house that could do that job ...

    I sure as hell wouldn’t be going diesel!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,059 ✭✭✭kirving


    Agreed, recipe for disaster with that kind of use.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,958 ✭✭✭✭Shefwedfan


    pwurple wrote: »
    Yes, standard service, didn't take any of their optional extras like battery conditioning etc. PHEVs are a combo, so you end up servicing both the combustion system with all it's oil, coolants, and other dirty systems like that , as well as the electric system, and the additional integration system which links the two together. That is the main downside of any PHEV, the servicing complexity.

    Don't get me wrong, we like the car, the size is very handy when you've got 4 bikes, a dog, beach gear, and a family to jam into it, and you can't afford the Tesla equiv. The type of driving we do (90% of our trips are ~30km) means we only need to put petrol in once or twice a year... But our pure EV is still way ahead for cost effectiveness due to the few hundred a year saved on servicing. There isn't that much saving over petrol at low mileage between an efficient petrol and a PHEV, compared to the EV.

    I would look into that, something doesn’t sound right....did you price around?

    What exactly did they do with the electric motor?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,489 ✭✭✭bennyineire


    Any thing to be said for a petrol Mazda 3 ? Yep looks smaller than what I said but we are a family of 4. How big/small inside are they.

    They look like a nice car with some decent up to date tech in them (unlike the Lancer)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,084 ✭✭✭rn


    I'm going to swing the thread back in favour of vw passat. IMHO in the vintage of your price range, it's a nicer looking car. I've the 1.6 diesel and I'm doing 8k each way morning and evening. I'm getting 5.1l/100km. It's got an enormous diesel tank, so I'm only filling up about once a month.

    Servicing done by my local, trusty independent garage. Cheap as chips to service. And they're so common, independent lads are used to working on them.

    The next I'd favour is petrol over phev. I just don't trust batteries to age.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,477 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    rn wrote: »
    I'm going to swing the thread back in favour of vw passat. IMHO in the vintage of your price range, it's a nicer looking car. I've the 1.6 diesel and I'm doing 8k each way morning and evening. I'm getting 5.1l/100km. It's got an enormous diesel tank, so I'm only filling up about once a month.

    Servicing done by my local, trusty independent garage. Cheap as chips to service. And they're so common, independent lads are used to working on them.

    The next I'd favour is petrol over phev. I just don't trust batteries to age.

    I’d trust batteries a lot more than a 1.6 TDI


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,489 ✭✭✭bennyineire


    Mmm I start looking at Lexus Lexus IS 300H in England, 15 plates for around €12-13k plus about €1,700 vrt. Yep its blowing my budget but I think I would get a good price for it in about 2 years time. Lovely looking car and hybrid.

    Is it worth it ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,477 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    Mmm I start looking at Lexus Lexus IS 300H in England, 15 plates for around €12-13k plus about €1,700 vrt. Yep its blowing my budget but I think I would get a good price for it in about 2 years time. Lovely looking car and hybrid.

    Is it worth it ?

    Yes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,489 ✭✭✭bennyineire


    colm_mcm wrote: »
    Yes.

    Concise and to the point, I like your style


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,477 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    Concise and to the point, I like your style

    My friend got one last year, it’s been faultless so far. It’s able to get good fuel economy, even on long motorway trips.
    Servicing isn’t cheap (most people stick with main dealer as you get warranty extension on the hybrid components) but it’s still relatively painless to own one.
    They’re not overly big inside, they’re not small, but they can feel a bit snug up front if you’re any way tall. They’re a bit low slung. I like them. There are a few specs I’d avoid in them, and there are a few spec must-haves.
    I’d say drive one locally and see what you think first. Used prices are stronger on them than they were a few years ago, but they’re still good value.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,853 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    Came across the below thread yesterday evening op, might be of interest to you ...

    https://touch.boards.ie/thread/2057976964/1/#post110062038


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,958 ✭✭✭✭Shefwedfan


    rn wrote: »
    I'm going to swing the thread back in favour of vw passat. IMHO in the vintage of your price range, it's a nicer looking car. I've the 1.6 diesel and I'm doing 8k each way morning and evening. I'm getting 5.1l/100km. It's got an enormous diesel tank, so I'm only filling up about once a month.

    Servicing done by my local, trusty independent garage. Cheap as chips to service. And they're so common, independent lads are used to working on them.

    The next I'd favour is petrol over phev. I just don't trust batteries to age.

    The1.6 was underpowered for the Passat....I wouldn’t even buy it in the Golf


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,958 ✭✭✭✭Shefwedfan


    Mmm I start looking at Lexus Lexus IS 300H in England, 15 plates for around €12-13k plus about €1,700 vrt. Yep its blowing my budget but I think I would get a good price for it in about 2 years time. Lovely looking car and hybrid.

    Is it worth it ?

    Lexus are beautiful and the hybrid engine is well tested and easy to repair as a toyota

    Lexus will hold it value as good as the next.....the hybrid over a straight petrol is great


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,335 ✭✭✭Redsoxfan


    And yeah, there are a few places that will change the console language to English, think the cost is €200 or thereabouts.

    Interesting, any links?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,489 ✭✭✭bennyineire


    Redsoxfan wrote: »
    Interesting, any links?

    You do know there is a thread for the Outlander PHEW


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,084 ✭✭✭rn


    colm_mcm wrote: »

    I’d trust batteries a lot more than a 1.6 TDI
    Really? I thought it was a reliable enough engine. I agree with other poster that it's underpowered.

    I see a good few complaints on batteries losing a good bit of range after a few years of charging. Similar battery technology in phones and I see how their life span is relatively short v whats expected from a car.

    If battery upgrades and replacements were reasonable cost I'd probably have a different view. Renaults model of renting the battery is possibly something worth looking at.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,958 ✭✭✭✭Shefwedfan


    rn wrote: »
    Really? I thought it was a reliable enough engine. I agree with other poster that it's underpowered.

    I see a good few complaints on batteries losing a good bit of range after a few years of charging. Similar battery technology in phones and I see how their life span is relatively short v whats expected from a car.

    If battery upgrades and replacements were reasonable cost I'd probably have a different view. Renaults model of renting the battery is possibly something worth looking at.

    Comparing a phone battery to a car battery is not really a comparison

    Easiest to leave it at that.....I wouldn’t read a lot of the rubbish posted about battery degradation......


Advertisement