Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

What's your wish list.....

1235

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,312 ✭✭✭✭Cienciano


    Insisting on having an "in house" movement is ridiculous. If you like the watch and the movement is accurate, easy to service and looks great through the display back and no one even knows it's not in house without googling that watch, who cares?

    Having said that, no way in hell I'd spend more than 2k on a watch without an in house movement. Makes zero sense.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,158 ✭✭✭893bet


    Fitz II wrote: »
    That's a reworked JLC movement which does somewhat easy the WIS nerves, as JLC has been a movement provider for all the holy trinity over the years :D. But really the purpose of a inhouse movement is to stifle counterfeits or when you want unusual complications or have space or dial layout requirement that off the shelf movements cant satisfy. It doesnt bother me one way or the other. Tudor are in house "designed" but outsource manufacture....Its all a nonsense, really.

    The one I am wearing has a GP movement actually....!

    In-house is definitely nonsense in a lot of senses. Good excuse to ramp up prices. And limits servicing options.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,158 ✭✭✭893bet


    Cienciano wrote: »

    Having said that, no way in hell I'd spend more than 2k on a watch without an in house movement. Makes zero sense.

    But why not? I feel a little the same way but can’t quite put my finger on why.

    The finishing on this rebadged 6498 far exceeds that on the majority of the Swiss brands with in-house movements at the same price point and even multiples of the price point.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,312 ✭✭✭✭Cienciano


    893bet wrote: »
    But why not? I feel a little the same way but can’t quite put my finger on why.

    The finishing on this rebadged 6498 far exceeds that on the majority of the Swiss brands with in-house movements at the same price point and even multiples of the price point.

    I don't know! I just explain it by everyone likes different stuff. Mick down the road thinks owning a watch is pointless because he has a phone to tell the time. So, a lot of owning a mechanical watch makes no sense.
    I like some of the high end quartz, some watch people would have zero interest in that. Sure I'm wearing a g-shock (casioak) right now with an aliexpress metal case which I love but i would have zero interest in a €2k tag with an eta movement. None of this makes sense, don't even try to explain it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 87 ✭✭PunkIPA


    Cienciano wrote: »
    None of this makes sense, don't even try to explain it.

    I think this sums up horology as a hobby in a nutshell.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,110 ✭✭✭Thirdfox


    893bet wrote: »
    But why not? I feel a little the same way but can’t quite put my finger on why.

    The finishing on this rebadged 6498 far exceeds that on the majority of the Swiss brands with in-house movements at the same price point and even multiples of the price point.

    Let's compare it to art - would "in house" be the sculptor who takes a block of marble and carves it into a Michaelangelo's David and "ebauche" be taking a Venus Di Milo shape and finishing it to a Venus Di Milo? There may be a feeling that yeah, they've turned a €200 movement into a super work of art - but it still has that history of a €200 movement left somewhere in it?

    Vs. the expensive in-house movements so no Seiko NH35s or Sea-Gull ST2130s - they were "designed" to be in €5000 - 50,000 euro watches from the beginning? A feeling of gilding the lily even if that's not fair (or true)?

    If someone refinished a Seiko NH35a (a $20 movement) to a Dornbleuth standard would you pay €2000 for it? The effort and work would justify the cost I'm sure - but are you always thinking - "but it's a gilded NH35a..."?


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,170 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Funny enough Michaelangelo's David was sort of an ebauche. Two previous artists had started work on the huge block of marble, but didn't get very far with it and it laid in a yard for years before Mick got the nod to finish it.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,158 ✭✭✭893bet


    Cienciano wrote: »
    I don't know! I just explain it by everyone likes different stuff. Mick down the road thinks owning a watch is pointless because he has a phone to tell the time. So, a lot of owning a mechanical watch makes no sense.
    I like some of the high end quartz, some watch people would have zero interest in that. Sure I'm wearing a g-shock (casioak) right now with an aliexpress metal case which I love but i would have zero interest in a €2k tag with an eta movement. None of this makes sense, don't even try to explain it.

    That does make sense. Similar to why a petrol head would pass no remark to a Renault Megane but might cringe a little a Merc Cla180 (Renault engine). Expectations are higher for luxury brands and it feels like a sellout to use a generic or shared movement. Makes it seem cheap and it highlights what we all know.......for a luxury watch the material make up only a small part of the cost. The most of the cost is the brand name but with in-house movements the cost can be justified to ourselves partially at least.


    As you say people value different things. Some people value “value”. Some people value brands. Some people value history. Some value “value retention”.

    I value quality of finish above everything so I can make peace with Unitas movement that’s been on steroids I think. As long as the case size suits my wrist profile! Cases on the way so time will tell!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,158 ✭✭✭893bet


    Thirdfox wrote: »
    If someone refinished a Seiko NH35a (a $20 movement) to a Dornbleuth standard would you pay €2000 for it? The effort and work would justify the cost I'm sure - but are you always thinking - "but it's a gilded NH35a..."?

    In the right watch I think so. If it was thrown into a seiko 5 case. Then no.

    Same as this Unitas, it has been half thrown away, parts redesigned and added and refinished. And ......combined with engraved brass and enamel dials. Over all package is haaaawt.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,158 ✭✭✭893bet


    If I get one I will likely engrave the movement also. Though that does mean I can’t spend 15-20 minutes talking about the box it came in on YouTube before returning it for a refund but that is a cross I will carry.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,553 ✭✭✭Fitz II


    In the car world (BMW is the one I know about) they often take a tried andd tested engine block like the legendary 6 Cylinder and fettle it into the high end models like the M car engines. Now the m car engines are totally reworked, finer tollerances, better parts etc but at the end of the day it started life as a bog standard 6 cylinder block. Aston martin mow put AMG engines in their cars instead of making their own engines. 4 Wheel drive units are all from the same few suppliers, the gearboxes are nearly all from a supplier call ZF.

    The in house thing is funny. I suppose its romantic to think of a craftman making every component of the watch but really it doesnt happen these days, Even the likes of Daniels and now Smith dont make main springs.

    Take the AP Chrono calibre 2385, same calibre is used in the VC Offshore Chrono, its in house for AP but not for VC that makes no sense that you would care its a good movement.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,170 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Fitz II wrote: »
    In the car world (BMW is the one I know about) they often take a tried andd tested engine block like the legendary 6 Cylinder and fettle it into the high end models like the M car engines. Now the m car engines are totally reworked, finer tollerances, better parts etc but at the end of the day it started life as a bog standard 6 cylinder block.
    Yep. Honda did the same with their R engines, Ford took the mundane if bulletproof cast iron block used in Cortinas and the like, slapped a twin cam head on it and jammed in a turbo and the Cosworth one of the most successful racing engines ever was born. Lotus made a point of taking outside mundane engines and fettling them. It's a big thing in the car world and is actually seen as a good thing to take a tried and tested base, even a bought in lump from another brand and rock it out.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,312 ✭✭✭✭Cienciano


    Yeah, cars do it but guess what? Cars aren't watches and something in the car world doesn't necessarily transfer to the watch world.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,170 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    As TF noted earlier Citizen, Seiko and Sea-Gull are "inhouse" and have been forever. I could add the French LIP and Mortima to the list. Mortima, the now defunct purveyor of very cheap and cheerful watches were more inhouse than any Swiss. they made everything in the factory, dials, cases, hands etc, even their own straps, jewels and springbars. And haute couture watchmaking they were not. :D American brands were far more inhouse, when they were still around. Of the Swiss brands? Well the Swiss had always outsourced from the early days. Initially with handmade parts and then when industrialisation came along(nicked from the Americans) they continued that parts bin trend. Well it worked and worked very well.

    When the wristwatch came along the Swiss brands would buy cases from company A, very often movements from company B, dials from company C and so on. Rolex were the king of this. In the early days they weren't a manufacturer at all, more like a parts assembly house/wholesaler. A rare few like Zenith, IWC(who were more known as movement makers until the 40's) and Longines were movement wise fully inhouse until the late 60's. Few enough of any of the rest were.

    People originally bought watches depending on the retailer, often by the jewel count, then came the brand name(again an American import notion, Rolex being the pioneer of that in the rest of the anglosphere), the movements or where they originated would have barely been in the mix for 99% of customers.

    Now I do get why it's a wish/concern for buyers today, but it's quite the more recent concern.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,110 ✭✭✭Thirdfox


    Wibbs wrote: »
    As TF noted earlier Citizen, Seiko and Sea-Gull are "inhouse" and have been forever. I could add the French LIP and Mortima to the list. Mortima, the now defunct purveyor of very cheap and cheerful watches were more inhouse than any Swiss. they made everything in the factory, dials, cases, hands etc, even their own straps, jewels and springbars. And haute couture watchmaking they were not. :D American brands were far more inhouse, when they were still around. Of the Swiss brands? Well the Swiss had always outsourced from the early days. Initially with handmade parts and then when industrialisation came along(nicked from the Americans) they continued that parts bin trend. Well it worked and worked very well.

    When the wristwatch came along the Swiss brands would buy cases from company A, very often movements from company B, dials from company C and so on. Rolex were the king of this. In the early days they weren't a manufacturer at all, more like a parts assembly house/wholesaler. A rare few like Zenith, IWC(who were more known as movement makers until the 40's) and Longines were movement wise fully inhouse until the late 60's. Few enough of any of the rest were.

    People originally bought watches depending on the retailer, often by the jewel count, then came the brand name(again an American import notion, Rolex being the pioneer of that in the rest of the anglosphere), the movements or where they originated would have barely been in the mix for 99% of customers.

    Now I do get why it's a wish/concern for buyers today, but it's quite the more recent concern.

    We should add Vostok to the list of "inhouse manufacturers" too :pac:


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,170 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    True dat. :)

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,312 ✭✭✭✭Cienciano


    Or casio. My g-shock has an in house movement


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,553 ✭✭✭Fitz II


    893bet wrote: »
    If I get one I will likely engrave the movement also. Though that does mean I can’t spend 15-20 minutes talking about the box it came in on YouTube before returning it for a refund but that is a cross I will carry.

    What like some kind of bargain basement Tim Mosso droning into the camera for circa 15-20 minutes? That would be a sad thing to do, worthy of pity.
    Cienciano wrote: »
    Or casio. My g-shock has an in house movement

    But the in house thing is really overplayed and draws very arbitrary lines in the sand as to where original design and manufacture starts and ends. Zenith Daytona owners are not fussed, and in more complicated watches you often find heavily modified valjoux movements (speedmaster reduced) or ETA chrono modules etc.

    The very real irony is that the Royal Oak Chrono which the Casioak apes is not in house, its based on the F. Piguet 1185 movement and is regarded as one of the best chrono movements of all time. AP have an in house chrono movement in the Offshores but they are too big to fit in the slimmer royal oak case.

    I consider the obsession with in house movements to be a rather new thing and also one that does not withstand any level of historical or logical reduction. No a basic unmodified ETA 2824 Elabore is not good enough in a 5k plus watch but neither would an in house movement convince me that a cristopher ward watch or a Bremont less of a waste of time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,158 ✭✭✭893bet




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,733 ✭✭✭scwazrh


    Well you’d still be waiting on a hulk so not too bad



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,158 ✭✭✭893bet


    Tried one on today. Still like it. Would be a Rolex I would buy. But not sure I would wear.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 65,724 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    Well wear @893bet - that is class

    All the Rolex fans are going to shoot me now but I fancy a pre-ceramic bluesy. But I don't really like the two tone bracelet. So thought is to buy a sub date, get a bluesy dial and blue aluminium bezel insert and get it modified 🤪

    Fully reversible obviously.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,733 ✭✭✭scwazrh




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,767 ✭✭✭eljono


    Wouldn't it be easier to change the bracelet on the bluesy? 😄



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,158 ✭✭✭893bet




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,733 ✭✭✭scwazrh


    That’s hardly the JLC I messaged you about last year ?No papers with it



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,158 ✭✭✭893bet


    No. But it came from this parish at the bottom of one of the regulars watch drawer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,942 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    You spend more time trading watches in carparks than even the most dedicated dogger😉

    Great to look back over the old posts on this thread and see where folk went.

    I'd love to add a Bregeut XXI and a Sinn Damazsener or 1 of their GMT chronos.

    Don't know what I'd move on to add them tho.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 65,724 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    It would be far more expensive to go that route. Bracelets cost a fortune. A sub is about a grand cheaper than a bluesy, a genuine bluesy dial is about €400-500 and a bezel insert less than €100

    If I went the bluesy route and had to change the bracelet, I'd probably buy a jubilee to be even more different 😂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,158 ✭✭✭893bet


    But when you return to original condition the bracelet is way more scalable than the blue dial and bezel.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 65,724 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    If / when I return to original, it is back to being the sub date that I bought. Even if that leaves me with the dial / bezel insert that might be unsellable (in Ireland), it won't have cost me much

    Sub date is always an easier sell than a bluesy

    Thanks for your input though and that of the others, I have never done anything like this before or even considered it. Damn Rolex, they simply won't make the watch that I want 😂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 65,724 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    And for the life of me, I haven't found any pictures of anyone done the same but then with a steel jubilee. Have seen a pre ceramic bluesy with a TT super jubilee with hidden clasp from a DJ alright, which was quite tasty



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,238 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    Bluesy not a bit purple for all that no ? I can’t imagine it looking like you expect



  • Registered Users Posts: 30 goonso


    I had never opened this thread before, opened it today and was directed to the first page and noticed the JLC.

    Skipped then straight to the last page ttgo to the most current posts and saw it again

    Great to see that after such an old thread was started you got the watch you wanted.Congrats.



  • Registered Users Posts: 381 ✭✭Ian OB


    I intend over the next 3 (maybe 4) years to move from the Steinhart above to the Omega below.

    The only problem at the minute is trying to figure out what the in between watches will be. There aren't any watches in the €2k & €5k bracket that I can say I would like that much.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 65,724 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    Yeah it seems most of them have aged to a very dark sunburst blue almost purple. I really like that. That said, I have to try one on again, I just dismissed them in the past off hand as being too small.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,776 ✭✭✭Lorddrakul


    Purely on the wish, rather than any active effort, list...

    A Speedmaster Mark 4.5

    I love the dial, and the movement is a marvel for the time.

    My favourite automatic Speedmaster.



  • Registered Users Posts: 618 ✭✭✭Pablo_Flox


    For me... My stretch goal is to get this on my wrist in the next 3(ish) years. Life can throw some curve-balls, so let's see how that shapes up but thats the goal right now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,666 ✭✭✭traco


    My list is all over the place but here it is warts and all.

    Casio G Shock metal

    Zenith El Primero Chronomaster 410z movement

    Rolex GMT-Master II 16713, faded aluminum bezel and chocolate dial ideally on a jubilee if possible

    Jaeger-LeCoultre Reverso Duoface Tribute Duoface Calendar 3918420

    A. Lange & Söhne Grand Lange 1

    and for some reason I am really liking the retro Omega Seamaster 300 heritage in black




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,493 ✭✭✭Deep Thought


    The narrower a man’s mind, the broader his statements.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,733 ✭✭✭scwazrh


    I think that would end up looking a fake smurf ? Steinhart have what you need.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,776 ✭✭✭Lorddrakul


    Understood!

    My issue is that they make a watch that I like, but I don't think I could ever bring myself to wear one.

    I love a black dial, 39mm no-date Sub, but there are so many good homages out there, including one that I already have for a song, there's no need.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,238 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    worth trying one on (if you havent) i thought that would be my dream watch and it lasted no length with me! its very blingy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 65,724 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    No. I don't like the blue in the smurf at all. Or in that Steinhart. I'm only interested in the sunburst blue dial. Now of course I could go with a current or later previous model Bluesy, the sunburst dial is back. But I don't like the colour of the ceramic bezel. And of course that would leave the two tone bracelet 😁



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 65,724 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    Was my dream watch too. But when I tried it on, I dismissed it for two reasons: watch too small and in particular the dial felt very small. And that was the blue sunburst dial I was interested in most. I kinda like the bling and I didn't feel it was overwhelming



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 618 ✭✭✭Pablo_Flox


    Good to know. Haven't tried it on, I'm at least 3 years away from even being at the stage where I'd be willing to kick tyres without feeling like I'm wasting everyone's time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 65,724 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    You might as well go try it on somewhere, Weir's now have a decent rotation of exhibition only watches. It is likely to pop up soon enough. Otherwise it might turn out that you have been wasting your own time!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,733 ✭✭✭scwazrh


    So you like the bluesy but you dont like gold on the braclet , the gold on the bezel , the bezel insert and its too small . I dont know unkel but I think maybe you should just look for a different watch?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 65,724 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    Haha, it used to be too small, but I lost weight last year and strangely my wrist has gone down from 8" to 7.5". You'd think there is no fat on the wrist, but the tape measure says otherwise. Tried on a batgirl in Weir's a few weeks ago and the size was fine (used to be too small). So I figured that a same size pre-ceramic sub also would be fine now

    I do mind the modern ceramic bezels, in particular the blue ones. Ceramic on Rolex looks cheap and fake to me. I do like the old aluminium bezels, in particular the blue one on the bluesy. I don't mind the gold on the bezel or case, it's subtle enough compared with the bracelet



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,798 ✭✭✭mailforkev


    Agree with you on that unkel, i much prefer an aluminium bezel on a Sub.

    Strangely though, I don’t mind the ceramic GMTs at all. A batgirl is the only sports Rolex on my future shopping list.

    Could never warm to the bluesy, too chintzy for me.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement