Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Rumen Fluke Treatment

  • 11-02-2010 9:30pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 52 ✭✭


    Just wondering if anyone knows where i can buy Zanil (Oxyclozanide) for the treatment of rumen fluke? I tried my own vets but they cant source it, I think this is the only one that treats rumen fluke or am I wrong?

    Thanks


«13

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 520 ✭✭✭Pacoa


    I think this is the only one that treats rumen fluke

    Yes according to jack keneddy in the farmers journal, it's the only one to kill em.
    Don't know where you can get it though.


  • Registered Users Posts: 142 ✭✭gingerGiant


    I think this is the only one that treats rumen fluke or am I wrong?

    Your correct Zanil is the only one to kill stomach fluke, it's out of stock with all suppliers in my area, will not be available with any of them until very late feb or early march. Luckily I got mine early some of the neighbours are really trying hard to get their hands on it but can't.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,552 ✭✭✭pakalasa


    Are we over panicking about this whole "Stomach Fluke" thing. I don't think it is as widespread as people think.
    Jasus, a lot of people don't even do them for liver fluke.:(


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,175 ✭✭✭Red_Marauder


    pakalasa wrote: »
    Are we over panicking about this whole "Stomach Fluke" thing. I don't think it is as widespread as people think.
    Jasus, a lot of people don't even do them for liver fluke.:(
    It depends. Considering the amount of flooding that the countryside has endured, i think that to ignore the issue would be a greater sin. That said, there are some farmers who just like with liver fluke, are at a greatly diminished risk.

    If you can't get Zanil, ask you vet about rafoxanide (marketed as Ridafluke by Chanelle) and consider upping the dosage significantly for rumenal fluke. It doesn't really work at regular dosage.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6 michelle.shelle


    Hi,

    I done a lot of research on the different veterinary drug for the treatment of anthelmintic infections and oxyclozanide is the best drug on the market for stomach fluke, it is not efficient for the treatment for liver fluke so if you can get a combinaton product with oxyclozanide and another drug this would be the best thing. I dont know of any combination products for the treatment of stomach and liver fluke, maybe you might have to use two single products if it is needed.
    I think there is a veterinary formulation called levafas or something like that that contains levamisole and oxyclozanide and this has a short enough withdrawl period compared to drugs like nitroxynil and should be able to treat nematodes (roundworms) and stomach fluke if you have more than one problem to treat! Hope this is of help!
    :D


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 154 ✭✭morning delight


    I think there is a veterinary formulation called levafas or something like that
    Levafas diamond.
    Zanil can't be got in the country for love nor money!;) Not surprising considering no one heard of stomach fluke until about 3 years ago. Surprising though the pharma company hasn't upped production as it appears there is good demand for it!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,717 ✭✭✭LostCovey


    pakalasa wrote: »
    Are we over panicking about this whole "Stomach Fluke" thing. I don't think it is as widespread as people think.
    Jasus, a lot of people don't even do them for liver fluke.:(

    It probably depends on where you are Pakalasa. if you are on dry sandy soil, neither might be a big issue it might not matter whether you dose or not.

    If you are in the wet west where I am, it can be so bad that it ALMOST doesn't matter whether you dose or not!

    LostCovey


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 258 ✭✭krazyklown


    Just out of interest has anybody had confirmed cases of rumen fluke?

    I asked the vet in our local factory what he thought and he was extremly dismissive about rumen fluke - he felt it was a 'miniscule risk'.

    Then i met a rep from Norbrook who manufacture Levafas. He said the reason that rumen fluke has become such an issue was because it is spread by the water snail which had grown hugely in numbers from the wet years we had previously.

    hard to know if its all hype...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,701 ✭✭✭dar31


    krazyklown wrote: »
    Just out of interest has anybody had confirmed cases of rumen fluke?

    I asked the vet in our local factory what he thought and he was extremly dismissive about rumen fluke - he felt it was a 'miniscule risk'.

    Then i met a rep from Norbrook who manufacture Levafas. He said the reason that rumen fluke has become such an issue was because it is spread by the water snail which had grown hugely in numbers from the wet years we had previously.

    hard to know if its all hype...

    got 10 samples done in the spring all had traces of rumen fluke and liver fluke, over half had a high burden. milk tank samples taken 2 months back showed a high burden still. will monitor tank every 2/3 months from now on.
    never had fluke problems till 12 months ago, serious problem cost dearly.
    some of our ground is wet, but not the west wet.
    previously would only have used 500ml of trodax about every 3 years on 400 head.
    reaaly caught us off guard around x mas time, all our heifers suffered badly, luckly didnt loose any.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,717 ✭✭✭LostCovey


    dar31 wrote: »
    got 10 samples done in the spring all had traces of rumen fluke and liver fluke, over half had a high burden. milk tank samples taken 2 months back showed a high burden still. will monitor tank every 2/3 months from now on.
    never had fluke problems till 12 months ago, serious problem cost dearly.
    some of our ground is wet, but not the west wet.
    previously would only have used 500ml of trodax about every 3 years on 400 head.
    reaaly caught us off guard around x mas time, all our heifers suffered badly, luckly didnt loose any.

    Hi Dar31,

    I am curious about the milk tank sample testing for fluke:

    1. If it is a test for antibodies, then surely it is just telling you about the previous infection (which you have presumable cleared with a dose). How long do antibodies take to appear in milk of infected cows, and how soon do they disappear after treatment? Totally open to contradiction here, but I would have a strong personal preference for checking dung samples for fluke eggs - old fashioned but robust and easier to interpret. If fluke eggs are detected in a dung sample the animal has fluke. If no fluke eggs are detected, it could still have immature flukes, but you are probably in the clear.

    2. I understand that the bulk tank test can only tell you about liver fluke (subject to point 1 above), but it can tell you nothing about the rumen fluke. Is this correct?

    3. How much does the milk test cost?

    Sorry for all the questions, I just think that parasites are fascinating, if a bit frustrating.


    Thanks

    LostCovey


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,786 ✭✭✭✭whelan1


    sent a cow to ucd during the year and she had rumen and liver fluke - of course he said to use zanil , but where to get it ? wonder can it be got in the uk, we routinely do all cows at drying off for fluke


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,550 ✭✭✭Min


    My vet said to do all animals for rumen fluke, I did some for it last winter, anything that I thought that was underperforming was done.

    I know a person who lost several animals from it and it was confirmed in his herd.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,401 ✭✭✭reilig


    LostCovey wrote: »
    Hi Dar31,

    I am curious about the milk tank sample testing for fluke:

    1. If it is a test for antibodies, then surely it is just telling you about the previous infection (which you have presumable cleared with a dose). How long do antibodies take to appear in milk of infected cows, and how soon do they disappear after treatment? Totally open to contradiction here, but I would have a strong personal preference for checking dung samples for fluke eggs - old fashioned but robust and easier to interpret. If fluke eggs are detected in a dung sample the animal has fluke. If no fluke eggs are detected, it could still have immature flukes, but you are probably in the clear.

    2. I understand that the bulk tank test can only tell you about liver fluke (subject to point 1 above), but it can tell you nothing about the rumen fluke. Is this correct?

    3. How much does the milk test cost?

    Sorry for all the questions, I just think that parasites are fascinating, if a bit frustrating.


    Thanks

    LostCovey

    Analysing faeces for fluke eggs is an unreliable method of detection of fluke infestation. This is because early immatures and immatures can cause significant losses, and no eggs will yet be shed in the faeces.

    Only adult fluke give rise to eggs in the faeces, and expecting fluke eggs to be present may give rise to a misdiagnosis/losses.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,401 ✭✭✭reilig


    whelan1 wrote: »
    sent a cow to ucd during the year and she had rumen and liver fluke - of course he said to use zanil , but where to get it ? wonder can it be got in the uk, we routinely do all cows at drying off for fluke

    Whelan can you use Rafazole, Flukex, or Ridafluke? All have the same ingredient as the Zanil (rafoxanide). It might be worth checking with your vet. As Red_Marauder said above, it is made by Chanelle veterinary in Loughrea. If your vet approves what Red Marauder said above then I can check it out with chanelle for you as I know someone working there. But almost anything that they sell needs a prescription now.

    I see farmrite sold out of the zanil which shows that a lot of southern farmers got prescriptions and went to them. Maybe there's another UK or northern ireland seller that will sell to you if you get a prescription from your own vet??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,717 ✭✭✭LostCovey


    Reilig, me oul' segoshia,

    For once we absolutely totally agree on something!!!!!! More or less agree anyway, and your emphasis on the risk of disease caused by immature fluke is a fair point, even if it is more relevant for sheep than cattle.
    reilig wrote: »
    Analysing faeces for fluke eggs is an unreliable method of detection of fluke infestation. This is because early immatures and immatures can cause significant losses, and no eggs will yet be shed in the faeces.

    Only adult fluke give rise to eggs in the faeces, and expecting fluke eggs to be present may give rise to a misdiagnosis/losses.


    or as I put it
    LostCovey wrote: »
    If no fluke eggs are detected, it could still have immature flukes, but you are probably in the clear.

    However, the point I was making is that a positive faecal egg test is always significant - not so sure if that is true of the milk test, which is what I was really questioning.

    LostCovey


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,717 ✭✭✭LostCovey


    reilig wrote: »
    Whelan can you use Rafazole, Flukex, or Ridafluke? All have the same ingredient as the Zanil (rafoxanide). It might be worth checking with your vet. As Red_Marauder said above, it is made by Chanelle veterinary in Loughrea. If your vet approves what Red Marauder said above then I can check it out with chanelle for you as I know someone working there. But almost anything that they sell needs a prescription now.

    I see farmrite sold out of the zanil which shows that a lot of southern farmers got prescriptions and went to them. Maybe there's another UK or northern ireland seller that will sell to you if you get a prescription from your own vet??

    No rafoxanide won't do it Reilig. Oxyclozanide is the only product licenced in Ireland that will kill rumen flukes, Rafoxanide definitely does not. However a lot of people do not seem to realise that Oxyclozanide is in more products than just Zanil - e.g. the Levafas Diamond example given above.

    LostCovey

    LostCovey


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,401 ✭✭✭reilig


    LostCovey wrote: »
    Reilig, me oul' segoshia,

    For once we absolutely totally agree on something!!!!!! More or less agree anyway, and your emphasis on the risk of disease caused by immature fluke is a fair point, even if it is more relevant for sheep than cattle.

    There's no winner or loser here, you don't always have to be right. What you said is not true, its equally relevant for both cattle and sheep and goats for that matter and for you to say
    If no fluke eggs are detected, it could still have immature flukes, but you are probably in the clear
    is wrong and bad advice which can cause people to think that they don't have a fluke problem when they may have and may lose animals and profit because they don't dose for fluke.
    If you are in the wet west where I am, it can be so bad that it ALMOST doesn't matter whether you dose or not!

    Don't dose your animals for fluke and see how well they thrive. Try bringing sheep that you haven't dosed for fluke to a factory - they won't be long throwing the liver out on a desk in front of you to tell you how bad your farming practices are.

    We live in Ireland, our climate and land quality dictate that the majority of grazing land is prone to fluke. Every farmer should have an annual fluke dosing policy. To advise someone that it "almost doesn't matter whether you dose or not" is irresponsible.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,279 ✭✭✭snowman707


    I'd advise anyone who may think their stock is at risk from stomach fluke to consult their vet.

    Some of the information given on this thread is utter bullsh1t


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,717 ✭✭✭LostCovey


    reilig wrote: »
    To advise someone that it "almost doesn't matter whether you dose or not" is irresponsible.


    It's just an irony-free zone isn't it?

    For the record, and for the benefit of any pathologically literal/feeble minded people who my stumble on this thread, and for the clarity of all, please let me explain that I was advising no such thing.

    I humbly apologise if I implied that livestock production in wet land in the west of Ireland could proceed without fluke dosing. I didn't mean to. It was irony. Wasted.

    LostCovey


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,717 ✭✭✭LostCovey


    snowman707 wrote: »
    I'd advise anyone who may think their stock is at risk from stomach fluke to consult their vet.

    Some of the information given on this thread is utter bullsh1t

    Well, yes, that is true snowman707.

    But if you don't specify which of the information you think is bullsh1t, and leave us to guess, you're not adding very much to the discussion are you?


    LostCovey


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,786 ✭✭✭✭whelan1


    thanks lc another thread lost:mad:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,717 ✭✭✭LostCovey


    whelan1 wrote: »
    thanks lc another thread lost:mad:

    Don't be so predictable whelan1.

    If a discussion upsets you, you should not feel compelled to join it, but as you are here, you are welcome to join in. If you have anything to say

    If you have nothing to say but whinge about who is involved, you are still welcome.

    Nice to see you are still around.

    LostCovey


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,786 ✭✭✭✭whelan1


    why bother answering a thread that is inevitably going to be shut down by your comments ... i give up .. you win... good night


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,717 ✭✭✭LostCovey


    As far as I can determine, the following is the complete current list of licenced products on the Irish market that can kill rumen flukes (i.e. contain oxyclozanide at the proper concentration). If there are others, I would be interested to hear about them.

    Best regards,

    LostCovey


    Listed as Trade Name /Licence Holder = manufacturer usually / IMB Licence Number / Active Ingredient
    LEVAFAS C FLUKE AND WORM DRENCH Oral Suspension Norbrook Laboratories Limited 10999/042/001 Oxyclozanide
    LEVAFAS DIAMOND FLUKE AND WORM DRENCH Oral Suspension Norbrook Laboratories Limited 10999/036/001 Oxyclozanide
    NILZAN DRENCH PLUS Oral Suspension Schering Plough Limited 10277/027/001 Oxyclozanide
    PHARMAZAN C ORAL SUSPENSION 1.5/3.0/0.382 Oral Suspension Chem-Pharm 10823/020/001 Oxyclozanide
    ZANIL FLUKE DRENCH 3.4 Oral Suspension Schering Plough Limited 10277/043/001 Oxyclozanide


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,717 ✭✭✭LostCovey


    reilig wrote: »
    There's no winner or loser here, you don't always have to be right. What you said is not true, its equally relevant for both cattle and sheep and goats for that matter

    Again, just for the record, this is untrue, Reilig, and if you had experience with both sheep and cattle, it is really obvious. Immature liver fluke are not equally relevant for sheep and cattle.

    Sheep and goats are very susceptible to acute liver fluke disease, which is caused by immature flukes, and usually fatal.

    Cattle do not normally get this condition, as they have greater resistance to liver fluke.

    Cattle do get infested with immature fluke, they do suffer liver damage, but to a much lesser extent than sheep, and rarely show any ill effects. Sheep, especially lambs regularly die from the effects of immature flukes, often in numbers.


    LostCovey


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,401 ✭✭✭reilig


    LostCovey wrote: »
    Sheep and goats are very susceptible to acute liver fluke disease, which is caused by immature flukes, and usually fatal.

    Cattle do not normally get this condition, as they have greater resistance to liver fluke.



    LostCovey


    Is this more irony???. While older cattle are more immune to liver fluke (they still contract it and need to be dosed), younger cattle are prone to infection from immature fluke. This can cause significant condition loss or growth stunt and result in up to 30% loss. Fluke may be less fatal in cattle than sheep, but you are leading people astray by coming on here and telling them that cattle do not normally get immature fluke. Local vets and agricultural advisors are on red alert across the country after the wet july and are advising all farmers to dose against ALL types of fluke. Your statement above is misleading and if people were to follow the advice that you gave throughout this thread then they would not be dosing for immature fluke and only dosing when they saw fluke eggs in faeces which can often be too late to prevent losses - maybe not on farm deaths but significant dents in farm profit.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,401 ✭✭✭reilig


    LostCovey wrote: »



    Cattle do get infested with immature fluke, they do suffer liver damage, but to a much lesser extent than sheep, and rarely show any ill effects. Sheep, especially lambs regularly die from the effects of immature flukes, often in numbers.


    LostCovey


    Sorry, Just reading your post again and I realise that I missed out on the above point that you made which shows that you and I agree. But I feel that the advice that you are giving to people is not to dose cattle for immature fluke?? Is it?? While immature fluke will rarely cause death in cattle, it will result in significant losses in condition and growth - people need to be advised to dose for it, especially in young cattle. On my farm I don't just dose to prevent death - my dosing policy is also based around cattle thriving and growth.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,717 ✭✭✭LostCovey


    reilig wrote: »
    Sorry, Just reading your post again and I realise that I missed out on the above point that you made which shows that you and I agree. But I feel that the advice that you are giving to people is not to dose cattle for immature fluke?? Is it?? While immature fluke will rarely cause death in cattle, it will result in significant losses in condition and growth - people need to be advised to dose for it, especially in young cattle. On my farm I don't just dose to prevent death - my dosing policy is also based around cattle thriving and growth.

    No worries Reilig, it is really easy on these forums to mis-read a post......or a person.

    I wasn't exactly advising people not to dose for immature fluke - I wouldn't presume to advise anyone, but I would give my opinion. Any advice needs to be tailored to the farm & area.

    However some things are universal facts. Flukes are regarded as immature from day 0 (when the animal eats the grass with the fluke cysts on it) to say day 80 or so when the fluke starts laying eggs, and is considered an adult. As it grows, it does more and more damage, as it tunnels through the liver No available fluke dose kills all immatures. Some doses kill some of them. The very best kill flukes over 14 days (but only a percentage of these) and a few doses kill more or less everything older than 50 days.

    So when you say you dose for immatures, you mean you select one of the better doses. But assuming your cattle were on pasture infested with liver fluke (ie west of Kinnegad - joke) you let your cattle walk out of the crush after dosing with live immatures present in their liver, which your dose did not kill - no matter what dose you used. Furthermore, your cattle are picking up more immature flukes the second you let them out to graze, and the dose doesn't kill them after a day or two - none of the flukicides have a residual effect.

    And yes, there is no doubt that if you are using a flukicide that kills immatures, you are killing more flukes, and you are probably be getting some better performance as a result. But you are removing a bigger percentage of the flukes - that's all, so it won't be a dramatic difference whether your dose kills 55% of the flukes in the animal or 68% (I made these percentages up).

    The point I was trying to make was that immature fluke cause serious disease in sheep - I have seen sheep that were dosed every six weeks dying of acute liver fluke disease. That does not happen with cattle, possibly because they have a tougher liver with more fibrous tissue, and liver fluke find it harder to tunnel through it. Cattle also become resistant to liver fluke with age (as you say) partly because they react to fluke attacks by producing more fibrous (scar) tissue. Sheep immune systems just can't cope, and mature ewes are as susceptible as hoggets.

    So while I do actually believe that there is relatively little to be gained from dosing cattle for immature fluke, I do it myself, because it does reduce the burdens. But it is nowhere near as important as with sheep, where if I use an adult-only flukicide, I will get deaths.

    I think we also have to look at other measures, like drainage, fencing off wet areas, ditches and flooded areas, and also accept that there is land in the west which in a bad fluke year, is unsuitable for livestock, because the amount of dosing needed to keep them safe would be neither economic nor advisable. That is the type of land where I said it probably doesn't matter whether you dose or not - some places which have been heavily grazed by sheep are almost that bad, although I did mean it as a joke.

    This whole debate started about rumen fluke, where the same weather & ground conditions favour its development.

    LostCovey


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,552 ✭✭✭pakalasa


    .........who owns these legs?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 43 Cowmad


    It only takes a poddle of water for an animal to get fluke. Fluke is a major problem every where.Fluke is the number one problem in animal health followed by IBR then BVD


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,717 ✭✭✭LostCovey


    Cowmad wrote: »
    It only takes a poddle of water for an animal to get fluke. Fluke is a major problem every where.

    Well yes, an animal could get a fluke, but your herd won't get it from a puddle
    Cowmad wrote: »
    Fluke is a major problem every where.

    That is not true
    Cowmad wrote: »
    Fluke is the number one problem in animal health followed by IBR then BVD

    I don't agree, but companies marketing vaccines would be very pleased to have created that impression re IBR & BVD.

    Much hype, because they are fantastic diseases, cause tons of things you can't see, here buy a vaccine for magic fix, forget biosecurity, buy whatever you want from the mart. Joke.

    LostCovey


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,552 ✭✭✭pakalasa


    .........


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,701 ✭✭✭dar31


    pakalasa wrote: »
    .........

    been getting that feeling a lot lately


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,786 ✭✭✭✭whelan1


    i'm saying nothing:rolleyes:


  • Registered Users Posts: 43 Cowmad


    LostCovey wrote: »
    Well yes, an animal could get a fluke, but your herd won't get it from a puddle


    That is not true



    I don't agree, but companies marketing vaccines would be very pleased to have created that impression re IBR & BVD.

    Much hype, because they are fantastic diseases, cause tons of things you can't see, here buy a vaccine for magic fix, forget biosecurity, buy whatever you want from the mart. Joke.

    LostCovey

    Research has being carried by Teagasc that showed it takes a small amount of water for animals to get fluke.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,401 ✭✭✭reilig


    The point I was trying to make was that immature fluke cause serious disease in sheep - I have seen sheep that were dosed every six weeks dying of acute liver fluke disease. That does not happen with cattle, possibly because they have a tougher liver with more fibrous tissue, and liver fluke find it harder to tunnel through it. Cattle also become resistant to liver fluke with age (as you say) partly because they react to fluke attacks by producing more fibrous (scar) tissue. Sheep immune systems just can't cope, and mature ewes are as susceptible as hoggets.


    I totally agree with the above and I'm not being sarcastic. There was a study done in UCD which compared sheep liver to cattle and they did find that cattle had tougher livers to sheep which meant that the fluke did not bore it as much. I have a link to it, I'll dig it up and pm you with it. They studied different ages and found younger cattle to be more prone as you said above.

    So while I do actually believe that there is relatively little to be gained from dosing cattle for immature fluke, I do it myself, because it does reduce the burdens. But it is nowhere near as important as with sheep, where if I use an adult-only flukicide, I will get deaths.

    I disagree with you on this point, In countries all over the world they are advising to the benefits of treating cattle for immature fluke. As I said in the last post, its not to prevent death but to promote thrive. As you said, you do it yourself, so you must see benefit from it.

    I think we also have to look at other measures, like drainage, fencing off wet areas, ditches and flooded areas, and also accept that there is land in the west which in a bad fluke year, is unsuitable for livestock, because the amount of dosing needed to keep them safe would be neither economic nor advisable. That is the type of land where I said it probably doesn't matter whether you dose or not - some places which have been heavily grazed by sheep are almost that bad, although I did mean it as a joke.


    Agree, but a lot of land in this country is heavy wet land. Impossible to choose areas to fence off. But I do think that if people operate a sendible dosing policy against fluke, they can keep it under control, no matter what type of land they have.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 926 ✭✭✭leoch


    well how often should u dose them through the year if u are on wet ground and would lime or aerating the ground help get rid of them in any way


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,438 ✭✭✭5live


    Just reading about fluke. Lost 5 weanling heifers last year with rumen fluke and the rest about 50 kg lighter than normal and i am on verydry land that burns off in summer. Also watch out dosing for fluke in cows and incalf heifers this year. New analysis of residues can show up doseing for 12 MONTHS! Not good for dairy stock as only Endofluke can be used currently according to my vet. So 2 doses per winter until rest of products get retested and approved. Enjoy


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,786 ✭✭✭✭whelan1


    there was a dept of agriculture ad on page 2 of the farming indo this week and i meant to go back and read it BUT the paper went in the recylcing bin , did anyone readit and is anyone any the wiser on what we can use on dairy cows:D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,717 ✭✭✭LostCovey


    whelan1 wrote: »
    there was a dept of agriculture ad on page 2 of the farming indo this week and i meant to go back and read it BUT the paper went in the recylcing bin , did anyone readit and is anyone any the wiser on what we can use on dairy cows:D

    Hi whelan1,

    I didn't see the Farming Indo notice, but this is the Glanbia list from last March - has there been any change since that date?

    LostCovey



    Re: Certain Flukicidal Products – Clarification/Change in use in animals intended for Milk for Human Consumption

    Dear Supplier

    Attached please find Notice from the Irish Medicines Board regarding updating of Invermectin and certain flukicidal products.

    Recent advances in analytical technology developed by the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (DAFF) for monitoring of foodstuffs have called into question the precision of the labelling instructions of certain flukicidal veterinary medicines.*The veterinary medicines concerned contain clorsulon, closantel, nitroxynil, rafoxanide and triclabendazole used in dairy animals intended for milk production.*

    As a prudent measure, the IMB is advising that veterinary medicines containing these substances should NOT be administered to animals producing milk for human consumption, including pregnant animals intended to produce milk for human consumption.

    MEDICINES THAT CAN CONTINUE TO BE USED WITH STRICT ADHERENCE TO WITHDRAWAL PERIODS INDICATED
    Name of product
    Active ingredient
    Albex 10%
    Albendazole
    Albex 2.5%
    Albendazole
    Endospec 10% SC
    Albendazole
    Endospec 2.5% SC
    Albendazole
    Keelogane SC
    Albendazole
    Osmonds Flexiben 10% SC
    Albendazole
    Tramazole 10%
    Albendazole
    Tramazole 2.5%
    Albendazole
    Valbazen 10%
    Albendazole
    Zanil
    Oxyclosanide





    MEDICINES NOT TO BE ADMINISTERED TO COWS/IN-CALF HEIFERS
    Name of product
    Active substance involved in IMB decision
    Virbamec super
    Clorsulon
    Ivomec super
    Clorsulon
    Flukiver 5 Injection
    Closantel
    Closamectin
    Closantel
    Closiver for cattle
    Closantel
    Closamectin Pour on
    Closantel
    Trodax 34%
    Nitroxynil
    Deldrax 34%
    Nitroxynil
    Flukinex 9%
    Rafoxanide
    Orafluke 5%
    Rafoxanide
    Orafluke 10%
    Rafoxanide
    Fluken worm
    Rafoxanide
    Levafluke
    Rafoxanide
    Triazole
    Rafoxanide
    Fenafluke 5%
    Rafoxanide
    Chan Broad Spec
    Rafoxanide
    Rafazole Oral Suspension
    Rafoxanide
    Ridafluke 3%
    Rafoxanide
    Univet Multidose Fluke and Worm
    Rafoxanide
    Flukex 3%
    Rafoxanide
    Flukex 9%
    Rafoxanide
    Curafluke 5%
    Rafoxanide
    Curafluke 10%
    Rafoxanide
    Panafluke Oral Suspension
    Rafoxanide
    Fasinex 24%
    Triclabendazole
    Endex 19.5%
    Triclabendazole
    Fasinex 10%
    Triclabendazole
    Fasinex Super 19.5%
    Triclabendazole
    Fasifree 10%
    Triclabendazole
    Endofluke 10
    Triclabendazole
    Triclaben 10% for cattle
    Triclabendazole
    Tribex 10% for cattle
    Triclabendazole



    Glanbia Milk March 2010


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,786 ✭✭✭✭whelan1


    got a bill from osmonds with a flyer in it , theres a rumen fluke treatment which also does for worms called pharmazan . dont know the suitability for dairy cows


  • Registered Users Posts: 154 ✭✭morning delight


    LostCovey wrote: »

    MEDICINES THAT CAN CONTINUE TO BE USED WITH STRICT ADHERENCE TO WITHDRAWAL PERIODS INDICATED
    Name of product
    Active ingredient
    Albex 10%
    Albendazole
    Albex 2.5%
    Albendazole
    Endospec 10% SC
    Albendazole
    Endospec 2.5% SC
    Albendazole
    Keelogane SC
    Albendazole
    Osmonds Flexiben 10% SC
    Albendazole
    Tramazole 10%
    Albendazole
    Tramazole 2.5%
    Albendazole
    Valbazen 10%
    Albendazole
    Zanil
    Oxyclosanide

    You can still use Zanil by the looks of it. And Levafas Diamond too.

    I reckon I've lost 2 cows to rumen fluke in the last year. Both were treated for everything 3 or 4 times.

    This Spring I had another cow going in the wrong direction with a persistent scour so I got the vet who suspected rumen fluke and we sent samples to the lab (tested for the other usuals as well). Now the cow was on death's door so she got another course of antibiotics, levafas diamond (I couldn't get zanil) and copper (black cattle had the typical rusty colouring of the coat).

    The lab results came back with evidence of rumen fluke eggs and borderline/ low copper levels. The cow recovered. I had dosed and injected a few others I wasn't happy with and they improved as well. So then I was left wondering was it rumen fluke or Copper.

    Sure enough about 2 months later she started scouring again, and one 2yo heifer I was unhappy with started deteriorating again. I dosed them both 3 weeks ago with Levafas diamond only and within 4/5 days they were well on the way. (Of course I was supposed to repeat the dose after 3 days but just didn't have the time to do it! The down side of part time farming)

    Rumen fluke QED!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,717 ✭✭✭LostCovey


    whelan1 wrote: »
    got a bill from osmonds with a flyer in it , theres a rumen fluke treatment which also does for worms called pharmazan . dont know the suitability for dairy cows

    It's oxyclozanide (or oxyclosanide as Glanbia spell it above). So it will kill rumen fluke too.

    LC

    http://www.imb.ie/EN/Medicines/VeterinaryMedicines/VeterinaryMedicinesListing.aspx?x=&page=1&query=pharmazan&tradename=&LicenceHolder=&LicenceNumber=&Active=&LegalStatus=&SupplyLegalStatus=&AuthDateFrom=&AuthDateTo=&OrderBy=name&OrderAscending=True&Auth=AUTHORISED&DrugID=1995021100&WithdrawDate=ALL&Species=&ATC=&Ther=&Advanced=no


  • Registered Users Posts: 154 ✭✭morning delight


    LostCovey wrote: »

    http://www.imb.ie/images/uploaded/swedocuments/8676047_10823-20-1.pdf

    Look at 4.11 Withdrawal periods. Not to be used in dairy cows. It's the same ingredients as Levafas Diamond. That isn't allowed in dairy cows either, even though it only has a 5 day meat withdrawal.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,786 ✭✭✭✭whelan1


    i asked our vet the other day and he said they should all be back on the market later in the year its to do with the withdrawal times etc , they wherent looked into properly , i think


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,696 Mod ✭✭✭✭blue5000


    science moves on and there is probably a newer way of testing for residues which is way more sensitive than before. Anyway isn't it the liver that breaks down all these chemicals in the body, and if we're using something that targets the liver (sorry may be off thread here) traces are bound to stay in the liver?

    If the seat's wet, sit on yer hat, a cool head is better than a wet ar5e.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,717 ✭✭✭LostCovey


    blue5000 wrote: »
    science moves on and there is probably a newer way of testing for residues which is way more sensitive than before. Anyway isn't it the liver that breaks down all these chemicals in the body, and if we're using something that targets the liver (sorry may be off thread here) traces are bound to stay in the liver?

    I think the issue is that is that in the past, it was possible to say that say milk must have no residues of product X.

    Newer tests are more sensitive and can detect tiny traces of product X for ages. So some work is needed to set sensible limits for each product, and in the meantime they are forbidden because any use would produce detectable residues, and safe limits have not been established.

    That is my understanding. Open to correction.

    LC


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1 Lucymart


    I'm new to this forum and was wondering if anyone could help. I have a Suffolk Ram 3 years old who has stopped eating and is losing condition for the past week. It started with an eye infection which I treated with Opticlox. My vet suggested Rumen fluke. Is there anything i can do for him. Any ideas?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,237 ✭✭✭Username John


    Lucymart wrote: »
    I'm new to this forum and was wondering if anyone could help. I have a Suffolk Ram 3 years old who has stopped eating and is losing condition for the past week. It started with an eye infection which I treated with Opticlox. My vet suggested Rumen fluke. Is there anything i can do for him. Any ideas?

    You could get an FEC sample done, this will tell you if its rumen fluke, if so, then dose with Zanil, I had to do it myself only last week.

    Is he inside?

    When you say stop eating, is he eating anything? You could try giving him some ivy, but even if he does eat this is only a short term solution til you see what the problem is.

    I would say get the vet out, but your comment above about your vet said "it might be" wouldnt fill me with confidence :confused:
    But maybe I am being unfair, only you can judge that.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 9,041 Mod ✭✭✭✭greysides


    It sounds as though your vet hasn't seen him yet. That might be the best approach as he'll be able to see things you won't be able to tell us. Sometimes it may sound from the description as though it could only be one thing but on seeing the animal it's very obviously something else.

    An eye infection could be just an eye infection, the sickness being something else.
    Or, it could be a runny eye thats part of pneumonia.
    Or, it could be a listerial eye infection from silage, the ram now having the meningitis form of the disease.....................

    These things would be more obvious while looking at the animal rather than the best of advice from behind a keyboard.

    If you feel a visit isn't justified economically then could you take the ram to the vet?
    We can give advice here but it would only be worth what you paid for it........:)

    The aim of argument, or of discussion, should not be victory, but progress. Joseph Joubert

    The ultimate purpose of debate is not to produce consensus. It's to promote critical thinking.

    Adam Grant



  • Advertisement
Advertisement